Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Sustain. Food Syst., 08 November 2024
Sec. Aquatic Foods
This article is part of the Research Topic Sustainable Aquaculture Production for Improved Food Security View all 13 articles

Editorial: Sustainable aquaculture production for improved food security

  • 1Department of Fisheries and Watershed Management, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
  • 2Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States
  • 3Department of Biology Education, University of Education, Winneba, Ghana
  • 4DTU Aqua, Section for Aquaculture, The North Sea Research Centre, Technical University of Denmark, Hirtshals, Denmark

Food security has been persistently recognized in global discourse as one of the world's main challenges. Despite some progress toward ensuring access to safe, nutritious, and sufficient food for all people year-round (SDG Target 2.1) or eradicating all forms of malnutrition (SDG Target 2.2), FAO et al. (2024) estimated that between 713 to 757 million individuals (8.9%−9.4% of the worldwide population) experienced undernourishment in 2023. Based on the mid-range figure of 733 million, about 152 million additional people may have faced hunger in 2023 compared to 2019. With outputs from capture fisheries stagnating over the past few decades, aquaculture holds the potential to play crucial roles in achieving food security (FAO, 2020). Global demands for fish are expected to increase in future decades to meet the needs and preferences of a growing human population (Jennings et al., 2016). With global populations projected to increase to over 9.7 billion by 2050 (United Nations, 2024), seafood in general and fish in particular will continue to play an important role in providing nutrition and food security globally, especially in developing countries (Cojocaru et al., 2022; Bjørndal et al., 2024).

Two separate but interconnected sectors contribute to global fish supply: capture or wild-caught fisheries and aquaculture or farmed fish. In fact, as capture fisheries have leveled off, continued increases in production from aquaculture will be required in order to maintain or increase per capita fish consumption (FAO, 2020). According to the FAO (2022), aquaculture has for several decades, been the fastest growing animal production sector in the world, contributing to 49% of total aquatic production (FAO, 2022). This rate of growth and the sector's contribution to global food security, however, appear to be much lesser than estimated when seaweeds (algal autotrophs) are excluded from the production statistics and comparisons to terrestrial livestock productions are made based on only edible yields (Edwards et al., 2019). This, notwithstanding, the sector still holds the potential to make important contributions to sustainable food futures although its rapid expansion has consequences relating to environmental sustainability. Additionally, the sector faces challenges relating to the high cost of aquafeeds for finfish and shellfish, post-harvest losses, and pathogen-induced mortalities.

The article submissions to this Research Topic make contributions to solving some of the problems the aquaculture sector faces through perspectives, reviews, and original research works focusing on various aspects of aquaculture, including sustainable production (Chen et al.; Shen et al.; Mizuta; N'Souvi et al.), aquaculture nutrition (Akter et al.; Andam et al.), postharvest processing technologies (Barros et al.), production systems (Rossignoli et al.), fish health and welfare (Stentiford et al.; Zornu, Tavornpanich, Brun, et al.; Zornu, Tavornpanich, Shimaa, et al.), and aquaculture finance (Munguti et al.). The primary data for the articles published under this Research Topic were sourced from 13 countries spread across three continents (Figure 1) and broadly fall under the three pillars of sustainability: environmental sustainability (production technologies that optimize fish production and/or minimize significant environmental disruptions or impacts), economic sustainability (private-public sector partnerships and multinational donor investments), and social and community sustainability (social dimensions of aquaculture, especially in developing countries).

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Geographic distribution of the countries from which primary data was sourced for the articles in this Research Topic.

The development of aquaculture hinges largely on the formulation and production of low-cost, but nutritionally balanced aquafeeds for finfish and shellfish culture, but aquafeed remains prohibitively expensive for many small-scale farmers. The aquafeed industry has long depended on fishmeal as a chief protein source, but unstable supplies and erratic price fluctuations have called for partial or total replacements with more sustainable raw materials (Roques et al., 2020). The studies by Akter et al. and Andam et al. thus highlight the advancements in aquaculture nutrition over the last two decades through continuous innovations in feed formulation to improve feed efficiency and sustainability. The replacement of fishmeal with mysid meal up to 65% in diets for the Pacific white shrimp (Penaeus vannamei) without negatively impacting growth performance, feed utilization efficiency, and body composition (Andam et al.) represents a cost-saving strategy that can increase the profitability of shrimp culture. The successful inclusions of mustard oil cake, soybean meal, and rice bran as fishmeal replacers in diets for Labeo rohita (Akter et al.) highlight the possibility of using these unconventional ingredients as dietary protein sources to minimize fish production costs and positively contribute to increased food security, particularly in developing countries.

Due to significant pathogen-induced mortalities, aquaculture, which provides half of the world's aquatic protein, faces difficulties in providing a safe and sustainable fish supply. Investigating the causes of fish mortalities (Zornu, Tavornpanich, Brun, et al.), extending the interpretations of diseases beyond the identification of disease agents to address host, environmental, and human factors (Stentiford et al.), and bridging knowledge gaps in fish health management through education and research (Zornu, Tavornpanich, Shimaa, et al.) can enhance aquatic animal health and foster a resilient and sustainable aquaculture industry. Sustainability in aquaculture development is further gaining prominence due to environmental issues like water pollution. Reducing the impacts of aquaculture production on the environment should be a key focus if the sector, which paradoxically is largely dependent on clean water, is to sustainably contribute to global food and nutrition security. The implementations of resource-efficient and environmentally-friendly approaches such as green total factor productivity (the efficiency of aquaculture production considering environmental sustainability) (Shen et al.) and the adoption of emerging green production technologies in production (Chen et al.) are key ways to ensure this.

To build resilience and sustain production in the face of climate change and environmental degradation, aquaculture producers must adapt to short-term available options such as shading ponds and aeration or make long-term adjustments to production practices, including diversifying production systems and areas (Maulu et al., 2021). By expanding the areas available for aquaculture production, the industry can increase its production capacity to meet the rising human demands for fish and other aquatic products. Aquaculture production in inland saline environments, also known as “desert aquaculture” in some jurisdictions, offers the potential to increase production of euryhaline and marine species. While commercial aquaculture production using saline groundwater is well-developed in countries such as the USA, Israel, India, and Australia (Allan et al., 2009), it remains underdeveloped in some developing countries such as Pakistan (Rossignoli et al.). Inland saline waters provide key resources for producing fish and other aquaculture products by employing otherwise unproductive resources while minimizing reliance on freshwater resources, which otherwise serve as potable water sources for humans. The study by Rossignoli et al. serves as key baseline data to address some of the information gaps crucial for the sustainable development of saline aquaculture in developing countries. There is the need to strengthen technical skills in saline aquaculture in tandem with the establishment of hatcheries for salt-tolerant species, aiming to reduce dependence on freshwater species in saline pond environments.

With several projections highlighting the vulnerability of the entire aquaculture value chain to climate change and environmental degradation, there are valid concerns about whether the sector is growing sustainably and fast enough to meet future demands, further exacerbated by the rapidly growing human population. The present shifts in human dietary patterns toward sustainable foods may further cause the demand for seafood to rise sharply over the next 10 years, necessitating further research on innovative aquafeeds in all areas of sustainability. Prioritizing research on low-cost and complementary ingredients in aquafeeds, especially for species in low-trophic production systems, will be an innovative way to stimulate the development of the sector. Additionally, there is the need to adopt innovative production methods, prioritize disease prevention measures, and minimize the environmental impacts to optimize the economic, social, and environmental efficiency of the aquaculture sector.

Author contributions

KO: Writing – original draft, Conceptualization. KQ: Writing – review & editing. JK: Writing – review & editing. MV: Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Allan, G. L., Fielder, D. S., Fitzsimmons, K. M., Applebaum, S. L., and Raizada, S. (2009). “Inland saline aquaculture,” in New Technologies in Aquaculture, ed. G. Burnell, and G. Allan (Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Ltd.), 1119–1147.

Google Scholar

Bjørndal, T., Dey, M., and Tusvik, A. (2024). Economic analysis of the contributions of aquaculture to future food security. Aquaculture 578:740071. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2023.740071

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Cojocaru, A. L., Liu, Y., Smith, M. D., Akpalu, W., Chávez, C., Dey, M. M., et al. (2022). The “seafood” system: aquatic foods, food security, and the Global South. Rev. Env. Econ Policy 16, 306–326. doi: 10.1086/721032

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Edwards, P., Zhang, W., Belton, B., and Little, D. C. (2019). Misunderstandings, myths and mantras in aquaculture: its contribution to world food supplies has been systematically over reported. Mar. Policy 106:103547. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103547

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

FAO (2020). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020. Sustainability in Action. Rome: FAO. doi: 10.4060/ca9229en

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

FAO (2022). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2022. Towards Blue Transformation. Rome: FAO. doi: 10.4060/cc0461en

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

FAO IFAD, UNICEF, WFP and WHO. (2024). The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2024 – Financing to end hunger, food insecurity and malnutrition in all its forms. Rome: FAO. doi: 10.4060/cd1254en

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Jennings, S., Stentiford, G. D., Leocadio, A. M., Jeffery, K. R., Metcalfe, J. D., Katsiadaki, I., et al. (2016). Aquatic food security: insights into challenges and solutions from an analysis of interactions between fisheries, aquaculture, food safety, human health, fish and human welfare, economy and environment. Fish Fish. 17, 893–938. doi: 10.1111/faf.12152

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Maulu, S., Hasimuna, O. J., Haambiya, L. H., Monde, C., Musuka, C. G., Makorwa, T. H., et al. (2021). Climate change effects on aquaculture production: sustainability implications, mitigation, and adaptations. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 5:609097. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2021.609097

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Roques, S., Deborde, C., Richard, N., Skiba-Cassy, S., Moing, A., and Fauconneau, B. (2020). Metabolomics and fish nutrition: a review in the context of sustainable feed development. Rev. Aquac. 12, 261–282. doi: 10.1111/raq.12316

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

United Nations (2024). World Population Prospects: The 2024 Revision. New York, NY: United Nations.

Google Scholar

Keywords: aquaculture production, ecosystem-based management, environmental impact, food security, sustainable aquaculture

Citation: Obirikorang KA, Quagrainie K, Kassah JE and Von Ahnen M (2024) Editorial: Sustainable aquaculture production for improved food security. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 8:1485956. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2024.1485956

Received: 25 August 2024; Accepted: 29 October 2024;
Published: 08 November 2024.

Edited and reviewed by: Edward Hugh Allison, WorldFish, Malaysia

Copyright © 2024 Obirikorang, Quagrainie, Kassah and Von Ahnen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Kwasi Adu Obirikorang, a2FvYmlyaWtvcmFuZy5jYW5yJiN4MDAwNDA7a251c3QuZWR1Lmdo

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.