Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

MINI REVIEW article

Front. Sustain. Food Syst.

Sec. Climate-Smart Food Systems

Volume 9 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1422922

Incorporating biodiversity in assessing the sustainability of livestock systems using comprehensive life cycle assessment: A Mini Review

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture, Health and Natural Resources, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, United States
  • 2Department of Zoology and Environmental Management, Faculty of Science, University of Kelaniya, Kelaniya, Sri Lanka

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Livestock are a major contributor to biodiversity loss primarily through land use change, over-exploitation of natural resources, pollution, and climate change. Intensive farming systems which depend on large inputs of resources accelerate the decline of species and exert immense pressure on biodiversity making the industry unsustainable. Hotspot identification and quantification of impacts along the value chain of animal products helps producers and policymakers to make informed decisions and provides insight for consumers to lean towards environmentally conscious purchasing. Life cycle assessment (LCA) provides a holistic approach to assessing the environmental footprint throughout the life cycle of the product or service. However, ecosystem services such as biodiversity are not often integrated with LCA, particularly in the context of livestock systems and the existing studies and methodologies fail to illustrate the impacts of biodiversity under various management practices. Also, most of these studies rely on a single midpoint impact category of land use change which works on the concept of species area relationship and metrics at species level. However, due to the dynamic and complex nature of biodiversity, a single mid-point impact or metric alone is unable to capture the full spectrum and does not provide a comprehensive understanding of the impacts. Additionally, lack of consensus on characterization factors, limitations in data availability (i.e., conservation status of taxa at local and regional level) and challenges in assigning weights for taxa and ecological functions based on their significance are some limitations to be addressed in future LCA studies.

Keywords: Biodiversity, Livestock farming, Biological footprint, Life Cycle Assessment, ecosystem services

Received: 24 Apr 2024; Accepted: 19 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Uddin and Sandeepa. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Md Elias Uddin, Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture, Health and Natural Resources, University of Connecticut, Storrs, 06269, Connecticut, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.