ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sustain. Food Syst.

Sec. Agroecology and Ecosystem Services

Volume 9 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1499410

Environmental outcomes of landscape-scale agricultural transitions in the Upper Midwestern U.S

Provisionally accepted
Rebecca  FudgeRebecca Fudge1,2*Alison  LovdalAlison Lovdal1Emily  ZimmermanEmily Zimmerman1Lisa  KushnerLisa Kushner1Julie  GrossmanJulie Grossman2
  • 1The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, United States
  • 2University of Minnesota Twin Cities, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The United States (U.S.) Corn Belt leads North America in row crop production, yet this high productivity comes at an environmental cost in terms of nitrate loss, soil erosion, and greenhouse gas emissions. In this study, we focus on the Upper Mississippi River basin within the U.S. Corn Belt, which represents a landscape scale for agricultural transformation. We outline a methodology to assess a suite of environmental outcomes associated with the transition from summer annual maize/soybean systems to incorporation of continuous living cover systems. We use and expand publicly available tools alongside empirical data to assess nitrate loss, soil erosion, and greenhouse gas emissions for four potential agricultural transition scenarios in the region, on an annual basis compared to a business-as-usual maize/soybean rotation. We consider the following four scenarios: incorporating 1) winter annual cover crops or 2) winter annual oilseeds into 50% of maize and soybean hectares in the region, or converting 50% of marginally productive maize and soybean hectares to 3) agroforestry or 4) pastured livestock systems. Our results indicate that all four systems are likely to reduce topsoil loss when compared to maize and soybean systems, and that the more transformative systems-agroforestry and pastured livestock-have the greatest potential to reduce nitrate loss. Yet, our results suggest that among these transitions, there are tradeoffs in environmental outcomes. For example, pastured livestock and winter annual oilseeds could potentially increase greenhouse gas emissions relative to maize/soybean systems. Our results illustrate that continuous living cover could improve environmental outcomes in the Upper Midwest, but there is tremendous uncertainty and variability surrounding those outcomes.

Keywords: Nitrate loss, Soil erosion, Greenhouse gas emissions, cover crop, agroforestry, Livestock, winter annual oilseed, Foodscape

Received: 20 Sep 2024; Accepted: 25 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Fudge, Lovdal, Zimmerman, Kushner and Grossman. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Rebecca Fudge, The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.