Doriana E. A. Tedesco
Alessandro Guerrini
Gabriella Giovanelli- 1Department of Environmental Science and Policy, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
- 2Department of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
The recovery of fruit and vegetable waste (FVW) from markets and processing plants should be considered a resource for functional feed ingredients since these wastes are rich in nutrients and valuable bioactive compounds. This study focused on FVW from the wholesale market in Milan, which is the largest in Italy, to evaluate the dietary fiber (DF), insoluble dietary fiber (IDF), soluble dietary fiber (SDF), total polyphenol content (TPC), and antioxidant activity (AA) of the FVW collected monthly over the course of a year. Compositional parameters were evaluated based on the month and season of collection (winter, spring, summer, and autumn). The samples collected each month were representative of the month and seasonality of harvesting and commercialization. The DF, IDF, SDF, TPC, and AA were statistically different (p < 0.05) based on the month and season, except for the TPC. Considering the seasonal pattern, the DF content was higher in the autumn and winter seasons (33.3 g/100 g dw and 30.8 g/100 g dw) than in the spring and summer seasons (19.9 g/100 g dw and 21.9 g/100 g dw). A similar trend was observed for the IDF content, which was higher in autumn and winter compared to spring and summer. The SDF content was higher in the summer (9.1 g/100 g dw) and autumn samples (8.1 g/100 g dw). The TPC was similar across the samples collected in different months (overall mean 2.4 ± 0.8 g/100 g dw), without significant differences based on the season of waste generation. The AA content was higher in the spring samples, albeit with high variability (34.4 ± 22.4 μmol TE/g dw). The overall mean solid content in the FVW samples was 10.8 ± 1.2 g/100 g. The results showed that FVW is a valuable source of functional compounds, which may improve the nutritional quality of animal feed. The major constraints in using FVW are the variability in the components from month to month, the presence of anti-nutritional components, and the water content, which compromises product stability. Future investigations are necessary for the recovery of this waste, given its potential added value as a functional feed ingredient.
1 Introduction
According to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), minimizing food loss and food waste is essential for lowering production costs and increasing the efficiency of the food production system, thereby contributing to a sustainable food system (Bennett et al., 2022). Compared to other food categories, fruits and vegetables have the highest wastage rates (40–50%) (FAO, 2011), which occur during various production, post-harvest, and processing stages, before reaching retail and human consumption (Vilarino et al., 2017). The reduction or reuse of these losses is intrinsic to the concept of the circular economy (de Oliveira et al., 2021), which views this waste as a co- or by-product of other production processes. It also recognizes the economic value of these by-products due to the nutritional value and the possible biological functionality of some of their bioactive components. In this regard, fruit and vegetable waste (FVW) can be considered a valuable source of nutrients and bioactive compounds. Additionally, as an ingredient in animal feed, it has the potential to contribute to sustainable animal production (Garcıa et al., 2005; Angulo et al., 2012a; Sahoo et al., 2021; Tedesco et al., 2021; Sun et al., 2024; Yohannes et al., 2024a). The reuse of FVW can be challenging because of its high moisture content. This characteristic contributes to increased perishability, susceptibility to microbial contamination, loss of safety parameters, and difficulties in handling and storing processes. Being intended for human consumption, fruits and vegetables must meet safety requirements, which are retained during processing and while on the market; the quality and safety of FVW can be maintained if it is processed immediately. Another issue to address is the variability in the quantity and nutritional value of waste throughout the year due to the typical seasonality of fruits and vegetables, geographic location, and product demand (Angulo et al., 2012b). In any case, some components of these particular wastes can provide physiological benefits, such as enhanced disease resistance, stress tolerance, improved animal health and welfare, and increased growth rates. The potential of FVW may be attributed to its nutrient content and the presence of bioactive compounds, especially polyphenols and dietary fiber (DF) (Nirmal et al., 2023).
The Milan wholesale fruit and vegetable market (SO.GE.M.I. Spa) is the largest in Italy, handling over 1.000,000 tonnes of products per year. It serves as a hub for wholesalers and producers supplying individual retailers.1 Every day, surplus fruits and vegetables that are still safe for human consumption but cannot be sold are donated to charitable organizations. If fruits and vegetables are spoiled or bruised, they are discarded at the waste collection site, placed in containers, and transported to biogas or composting plants (approximately 1700 tonnes/year). This waste is a valuable source of nutrients and, since it is intended for human consumption, it does not pose health or safety risks until it is disposed of at the collection point. The presence of heavy metals, pesticide and antibiotic residues, mycotoxins, and microbiological hazards was recently investigated and did not raise any safety concerns (Tedesco et al., 2021). However, it is important to consider that anti-nutritional factors (e.g., phytate, oxalates, tannins, saponins, and lectins) in fruit and vegetable waste are naturally occurring compounds that can interfere with nutrient absorption, digestion, or metabolism in animals (Bakshi et al., 2016; Pop et al., 2022; Yohannes et al., 2024b). As this waste consists of a mix of fruits and vegetables, the varying availability of individual fruit and vegetable wastes can help minimize the negative effects of anti-nutrients when the waste is used as a complementary functional feed ingredient.
In this context, vegetable waste from the wholesale market can serve as a safe raw material for conversion into feed ingredients and a source of functional components, such as dietary fiber and antioxidant compounds.
This study evaluated the functional nutritional characteristics of fruits and vegetables sourced from the Milan wholesale market, with the aim of exploring the possibility of using this waste as a functional feed ingredient. Dietary fiber (DF), soluble dietary fiber (SDF), insoluble dietary fiber (IDF), total polyphenol content (TPC), and antioxidant activity (AA) were evaluated in the FVW samples collected monthly over the course of a year. A statistical approach was applied to assess the variability in the composition of FVW in relation to the month and season during the 1 year of collection.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Sample collection
Samples from the wholesale market were collected each month from the waste collection sites. At each sampling time, approximately 100 kg of various fruit and vegetable waste was collected, based on the ratio of each fruit and the daily wastage material. The samples were gathered in accordance with EU regulation (Regulation 152/2009, 2009). The monthly samples were then prepared by weighing each fruit and vegetable in the appropriate proportion, manually cutting them into small pieces, and thoroughly mixing them. From the mixed FVW, 12 samples of 300 g each were stored at −20°C until analysis. Seasonal samples were obtained by grouping the monthly samples into the following four seasons: summer (June, July, August), autumn (September, October, November), winter (December, January, February), and spring (March, April, May).
2.2 Total solid content (SC)
For each month, three samples were analyzed in triplicate (n = 9). The samples were partially thawed and homogenized. The total solid content (SC) was determined from subsamples dried at 65°C to constant weight for 24 h (AOAC, 2005). The results were presented as g/100 g. All other analytical results were expressed on a dry weight (dw) basis.
2.3 Dietary fiber (DF), insoluble dietary fiber (IDF), and soluble dietary fiber (SDF)
For each month, three samples were analyzed in triplicate (n = 9). The DF, IDF, and SDF contents were quantified using the enzymatic-gravimetric method (AOAC, 1995). Briefly, the samples underwent sequential enzymatic digestion with heat-stable α-amylase (Sigma Aldrich), protease VIII (Sigma Aldrich), and amyloglucosidase (Sigma Aldrich) to remove starch and protein, allowing for the extraction of the dietary fiber fractions. The IDF was recovered by filtration of the digested samples and then dried and weighed. The SDF was precipitated from the filtrate by adding a preheated solution of 95% ethanol. After precipitation, the SDF was dried and weighed. The TDF was determined by summing the IDF and SDF. The results were expressed as g/100 g dw.
2.4 Total polyphenol content (TPC)
The total polyphenol content (TPC) was assessed using the Folin–Ciocalteu method (Singleton and Rossi, 1965). For each month, three samples were analyzed in triplicate (n = 9). Briefly, 10 g of each sample was finely shredded. Then, 100 mg was placed in a Falcon tube, to which 2 mL of methanol was added, and the mixture was incubated at room temperature for 48 h in the dark. The alcoholic extract was separated from the insoluble fraction by centrifugation at 6000 g for 5 min at room temperature. The assay was performed on each sample as follows: 25 μL of the extract solution was mixed with 1.5 mL of deionized water and 125 μL of Folin–Ciocalteu reagent (2 M). After 5 min, 0.5 mL of 15% Na2CO3 aqueous solution was added. The mixture was incubated in the dark for 2 h, and the absorbance was measured at 765 nm using a Jasco V-630 Spectrophotometer (UV-Vis/Vis, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Calibration curves were prepared with gallic acid (range 0–1 mg/mL) as the standard. The results were expressed as g GAE/100 g dw.
2.5 Antioxidant activity (AA)
The antioxidant activity (AA) of the samples was determined using the DPPH* (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) assay (Brand-Williams et al., 1995). For each month, three samples were analyzed in triplicate (n = 9). The assay was performed on clear methanol extracts, obtained as follows: each monthly sample (about 300 g) was partially thawed and finely shredded in a food mixer to obtain a well-homogenized sample. A total of 2 g of the homogenate was extracted with 20 mL of methanol:water mixture (60:40) in an ultrasonic bath for 30 min at room temperature. The mixture was centrifuged at 6000 g, the supernatant was separated, and the DPPH* assay (Sigma Aldrich) was performed, following the method previously described by Buratti et al. (2020). The method was calibrated by constructing a calibration curve with Trolox (6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetra-methyl-chroman-2-carboxylic acid, Sigma-Aldrich, Italy), and the data were converted into Trolox equivalents (TEs). Both the extraction and the test were performed in duplicate (n = 4), and the results were expressed as μmol TE/g dw.
2.6 Statistical analysis
The DW, DF, IDF, SDF, TPC, and AA data were analyzed using a generalized linear model (GLM), employing the GLM procedure of the Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SAS) (version 9.4; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC), with the month of sampling as the main factor. The four seasons were considered by pooling data from summer (June, July, August), autumn (September, October, November), winter (December, January, February), and spring (March, April, May). Subsequently, the pooled data were analyzed to investigate the effect of season on the variability. The values were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD), and the differences were considered significant at a p-value of < 0.05.
3 Results
The monthly FVW samples from the wholesale market were characterized by their DF, IDF, SDF, TPC, and AA. Table 1 reports the mean values ± SD of all parameters evaluated and the effect of month and season on the variability of the data. The fruit and vegetable composition discarded from the wholesale market reflected the month of production and commercialization. Highly significant differences (p ≤ 0.001) in all parameters were observed based on the month of collection. Concerning the season, the SC, DF, IDF, and SDF showed significant differences (p ≤ 0.005), whereas the TPC and AA did not differ significantly (p > 0.05). The SC was relatively low and typical of the matrix (average value over the year, 10.8 ± 1.2 g/100 g). Similarly, the DF, TPC, and AA showed high values typical of fruits and vegetables (26.5 ± 6.3 g/100 g dw, 2.4 ± 0.8 g/100 g dw, and 24.6 ± 19.8 g/100 g dw, respectively). In particular, a high SDF average content was detected (7.0 ± 2.0 g/100 g dw).
Table 1. Average values (mean value ± SD) and effects of the month and season of waste on the variability of the solid content (SC), dietary fiber (DF), insoluble dietary fiber (IDF), soluble dietary fiber (SDF), total polyphenol content (TPC), and antioxidant activity (AA) of the FVW from the wholesale market.
The seasonal pattern of the DF, IDF, SDF, TPC, and AA in the FVW from the wholesale market is presented in Figures 1–4. The DF content (Figure 1) ranged from 19.9 (spring samples) to 33.3 g/100 g dw (autumn samples), with similarly higher values in autumn and winter samples and similar lower values in spring and summer (p < 0.05). The fiber composition was characterized by a high ratio of IDF (Figure 2), which ranged from 12.9 g/100 g dw in summer to 26.5 g/100 g dw in winter. As observed for the DF content, significantly higher values were detected in the autumn and winter samples compared to the spring and summer samples (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Seasonal content of the DF (g/100 g dw) in FVW from the wholesale market (means ± SD). The seasons were defined as follows: summer (June, July, August), autumn (September, October, November), winter (December, January, February), and spring (March, April, May). Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Seasonal content of the IDF (g/100 g dw) in FVW from the wholesale market (means ± SD). The seasons were defined as follows: summer (June, July, August), autumn (September, October, November), winter (December, January, February), and spring (March, April, May). Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Seasonal content of the SDF (g/100 g dw) in FVW from the wholesale market (means ± SD). The seasons were defined as follows: summer (June, July, August), autumn (September, October, November), winter (December, January, February), and spring (March, April, May). Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 4. Seasonal values of the TPC (g GAE/100 g dw) in FVW from the wholesale market (means ± SD). The seasons were defined as follows: summer (June, July, August), autumn (September, October, November), winter (December, January, February), and spring (March, April, May).
The distribution of the SDF fraction showed a different pattern (Figure 3). The highest levels were observed in the summer and autumn samples (9.1 ± 0.8 g/100 g dw, 8.12 ± 1.02 g/100 g dw, respectively), while the lowest level was observed in winter (4.31 ± 0.5 g/100 g dw), with an intermediate value in spring (6.6 ± 1.0 g/100 g dw) (p < 0.05).
It should be noted that the TPC (Figure 4) of FVW was almost constant throughout the year, ranging from 2.1 g GAE/100 g dw (autumn) to 2.7 g GAE/100 g dw (spring), with no significant differences across the seasons (p < 0.05). In contrast, the AA (Figure 5) determined using the DPPH* assay showed significant differences across the seasons, with higher values in the spring samples, albeit with a high dispersion of the data. The AA ranged from 12.5 μmol TE/g dw in the summer samples to 34.4 μmol TE/g dw the spring samples.
Figure 5. Seasonal AA (μmol TE/g dw) in FVW from the wholesale market (means ± SD). The seasons were defined as follows: summer (June, July, August), autumn (September, October, November), winter (December, January, February), and spring (March, April, May). The whiskers represent the upper and lower values of the data. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).
4 Discussion
From the perspective of improving the sustainability of agri-food production and reducing food loss and food waste, the reuse of FVW originating from wholesale markets or transformation plants is particularly promising. Both strategies—reducing the amount of FVW and valorizing FVW as a source of nutritionally relevant compounds—can be implemented (Sagar et al., 2018; Cassani and Gomez-Zavaglia, 2022). A critical consideration is related to the safety of reusing this waste as an ingredient for animal feed. Animal feed manufacturers should use sustainable, secure, and safe resources. Fruits and vegetables intended for human consumption are subjected to strict regulations to ensure an adequate hygienic profile. Therefore, at the original point where fruits and vegetables are discarded, safety issues are not highlighted, such as the presence of heavy metals, pesticides, antibiotic residues, mycotoxins, or microbiological hazards (Tedesco et al., 2021).
Bioactive compounds are commonly found in vegetable products (Wadhwa et al., 2015). The health-promoting effects of these compounds are mainly mediated through biochemical and cellular interactions, which further prevent susceptibility to diseases, promote animal health, and improve the quality or quantity of their products (Durmic and Blache, 2012). FVW in the livestock feed sector can be considered a valuable source of bioactive compounds (Bakshi et al., 2016).
The content of DF in the waste generated over a year from the wholesale market averaged 26.5 ± 6.3 g/100 g dw. From a nutritional perspective, DF is defined as non-digestible carbohydrates and lignin resistant to mammalian digestive enzymes (Trowell, 1976). Interest in DF has grown due to its beneficial physiological effects on the gastrointestinal tract (Hipsley, 1953). Based on its interaction with water, dietary fiber comprises two fractions: the insoluble fraction, which includes cellulose and lignin, and the soluble fraction, which includes pectins, beta-glucans, hemicelluloses, gums, and galactans (Van Soest et al., 1991; Davidson and McDonald, 1998). DF can be digested by both rumen microbiota and gut microbiota. In monogastric animals, one crucial function of DF is to act as a prebiotic, modifying the types and functions of gut bacteria. The health-beneficial effects of DF on the microbiota and immune system are well-reported (Hooper et al., 2012; Jha et al., 2019). The positive effect of fiber consumption might be associated with modifications in the physicochemical properties of the digesta, enhanced fermentation capacity in monogastric animals, and the colonization of beneficial commensal microbiota that competitively blocks the adhesion of pathogenic bacteria to the gastrointestinal tract mucosa (Molist et al., 2014). Soluble fiber, primarily found in fruits, legumes, and oats, is known to lower LDL cholesterol and may aid in the regulation of blood sugar levels (Slavin, 2013).
Insoluble fiber contributes to appetite control and the prevention of constipation (Yang et al., 2012). High-fiber diets have been linked to a lower incidence of several diseases. Benefits include boosting the volume of fecal bulk, reducing the duration of intestinal transit, lowering cholesterol and glycemic levels, and encouraging the growth of the intestinal flora (Hooper et al., 2012; Jha et al., 2019). Considering the content of DF and its insoluble and soluble fractions, the FVW analyzed in this study can be considered a good source of fiber, even for monogastric animals that need low fiber quantities to stay healthy. However, the composition of the FVW varied over time; this can pose problems in the formulation of feed using FVW as an ingredient. Nevertheless, its potential as a functional, fiber-rich ingredient should be exploited.
Phenolic compounds are secondary plant metabolites that represent a major class of bioactive compounds. The intake of polyphenols from fruits and vegetables is nutritionally important due to their biological activities, including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, and antimicrobial effects, as well as their positive influence on intestinal morphology and nutrient absorption, especially in monogastric animals (Kamboh et al., 2015; Lipiński et al., 2017). The role of polyphenols is well-recognized in animal nutrition. Supplementation with polyphenols has shown an improvement in animal health, growth performance, and the quality of products (Hashemi and Davoodi, 2011; Serra et al., 2021; Budiarto et al., 2024). Studies have reported that feeding fruit waste (such as grape pomace, orange/Citrus pulp, etc.) rich in polyphenols to chickens, laying hens, and ruminants improves the meat and egg quality, increases polyunsaturated fatty acids concentrations, and reduces lipid peroxidation due to increased radical scavenging activity (Goñi et al., 2007; Goliomytis et al., 2018; Tayengwa et al., 2020; Arend et al., 2022). Similarly, in pigs and rabbits that were fed fruit and vegetable waste rich in polyphenols, meat analysis revealed an increase in polyunsaturated and monounsaturated fatty acids concentrations, along with a reduction in thiobarbituric acid reactive substances and improved oxidative stability (Hossain et al., 2012; Dal Bosco et al., 2012; Tian et al., 2023; Blasi et al., 2024).
Despite the variable monthly composition of other parameters, the FVW collected in this study showed a constant level of polyphenols throughout the year, with an average content of 2.4 ± 0.8 g GAE/100 g dw. Numerous studies in the literature have reported the TPC values referring for individual types of fruit or vegetable waste. Studies have reported that apple pomace and peel, for example, contain TPC values of 10.2 mg GAE/g dw and 28.3 mg GAE/g dw, respectively (Sudha et al., 2007; Henríquez et al., 2010). Regarding white grapes, red grape pomace, tomato pomace, and kiwi juice pomace, TPC has been reported to range from 11.6 to 15.8 mg GAE/g dw, 21.4 to 26.7 mg GAE/g dw, 55.1 mg GAE/g dw, and 1.30 to 4.87 mg GAE/g dw, respectively (Deng et al., 2011; Azabou et al., 2020; Carbone et al., 2020). Of peel waste, Citrus species were reported to exhibit a TPC range of 14.8–8.4 mg GAE/ g dw (Budiarto et al., 2024). Furthermore, in a study conducted by Ahmadi et al., (2020), a waste mix (onion, lemon, potato, tomato, plum, etc) showed an overall TPC value of 10.1 mg GAE/g dw. Compared to the data in the literature, the FVW analyzed in this study possessed a similar or higher level of TPC, which was scarcely influenced by the period of collection. Therefore, this waste represents a rich source of untapped, potentially readily available polyphenols that could be used in animal feed. Polyphenols present in FVW are likely to have good bioavailability due to the presence of associated saccharides, especially in fruits (Sieminska-Kuczer et al., 2021). These saccharides increase the secretion of digestive enzymes, bile, and mucus and enhance the phenolic bioavailability, particularly in the small and large intestines (Chiva-Blanch and Visioli, 2012; Brenes et al., 2016).
Polyphenols have the ability to counteract reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, which, especially during oxidative stress, triggers degenerative and inflammatory diseases (Gessner et al., 2017; Artuso-Ponte et al., 2020). The presence of phenolic compounds is mainly responsible for the antioxidant activity of fruits and vegetables (Wijngaard et al., 2009). In our study, the overall value of antioxidant activity was 24.6 ± 19.8 μmol TE/g dw and the highest antioxidant capacity was measured in the spring samples (34.4 ± 22.4 μmol TE/g dw). This high value may be due to the presence of products particularly rich in ascorbic acid in the waste. Among the most common FVW evaluated in the above-cited studies, Citrus peel showed an antioxidant capacity ranging from 8.7 to 15.1 μmol TE/g dw (Budiarto et al., 2024). Grape seed pomace showed the highest antioxidant potential, with an antioxidant capacity of 160.9 μmol TE/g dw (Costa et al., 2019). In contrast, orange and apple juice showed DPPH* scavenger activities of 26.3 and 35.4 μmol TE/100 mL, respectively (Šeregelj et al., 2024). An appreciable amount of polyphenols can remain in the solid residues of digested food, where they can be absorbed by dietary fiber. Considering that the microflora in the digestive tract can disrupt the DF matrix, these polyphenols can be released and metabolized, producing molecules with health benefits (Fulgencio, 2011).
As fruit and vegetable wastes and by-products represent a potential source of valuable compounds, tapping into their full potential would contribute positively to the circular economy by adding value through the development of “innovative” products (Laufenberg et al., 2003). The main limitation is the high moisture content, which is responsible for the rapid deterioration of this waste. The first step in implementing the use of FVW as a feed ingredient is to reduce the moisture content, ensuring the maintenance of safety requirements during storage and use. FVW could be dehydrated using methods such as sun-drying, vacuum/connective-drying, freeze-drying, or infrared-drying (Sogi et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2022). Given the large quantities of waste that need to be dried, the application of these technologies is rather complicated and cost-prohibitive. Moreover, due to the rapid deterioration of FVW biomass, companies or vegetable markets should deliver it to the processing plant within a short time. As an alternative to dehydration, ensiling is a sustainable and biological method for storing large amounts of FVW, which could be used directly on-site without excessive costs. Ensiling is a storing technique with a low environmental impact, which is widely used for ruminant feed production. It relies on the activity of lactic acid bacteria in anaerobic conditions, which leads to a reduction in pH, preserving forages and optimizing the nutritional and microbial quality of the feed (Mejía-Avellaneda et al., 2022; Ma et al., 2023). Due to the composition of FVW, ensiling should be combined with co-ensiled crop residue biomass to help reduce moisture (Duo et al., 2018). Additionally, using probiotic bacteria inoculum (i.e., Lactobacillus plantarum, Lacticaseibacillus casei, L. rhamnosus, etc) can inhibit the growth and metabolism of pathogenic microorganisms, thereby improving the ensiling quality (Keshri et al., 2018).
Another challenge is the nutritional variability of FVW observed throughout the year, which complicatesfeed formulation. The use of rapid NIR spectroscopy to evaluate the nutritional composition before adding FVW to a diet could help address this problem (Tedesco et al., 2021). In addition, the potential presence of anti-nutritional components must be considered; however, the variable presence of individual fruits and vegetables containing anti-nutritional factors in a multi-component mixture can minimize the negative effects of anti-nutritional factors. This risk is further reduced by including FVW as a complementary ingredient in the animal’s diet.
5 Conclusion
This study indicates that FVW from a wholesale market is a valuable source of nutritional compounds that can be valorized in the food chain by producing functional feed ingredients. The major constraints in the reuse of FVW are its high moisture content and its variable composition throughout the year. Since the waste from fruits and vegetables is constantly increasing, its reallocation to animal feed can contribute to sustainable livestock production. Efforts are needed to improve processing technologies that make this waste reusable in animal nutrition. In addition, further investigations are needed to fully characterize this particular waste to exploit its potential added value as a functional feed ingredient.
The results from this study only pertain to the FVW obtained from the Milan wholesale market over 1 year. However, we can assume that similar data would be obtained from wholesale markets in regions with similar food habits and that yearly variability should not significantly affect the general results. Research should be expanded to include markets representing different dietary patterns to establish the composition of their FVW and assess its potential use as a feed ingredient.
Data availability statement
The datasets presented in this article are not readily available because data will be made available on request only after authorization from the company where the assessment was carried out. Requests to access the datasets should be directed to ZG9yaWFuYS50ZWRlc2NvQHVuaW1pLml0.
Author contributions
DT: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AG: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. GG: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This research was funded by UNIMI Research Support Plan-Research Funds of the Department of Environmental Science and Policy -Call Line 2 -a project entitled “From vegetable waste to innovative nutrients applicable in animal feed.”
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the support from the University of Milan through the APC initiative.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Footnotes
References
Ahmadi, F., Lee, Y. H., Lee, W. H., Oh, Y. K., Park, K. K., and Kwak, W. S. (2020). Fruit and vegetable discards preserved with sodium metabisulfite as a high-moisture ingredient in total mixed ration for ruminants: effect on in vitro ruminal fermentation and in vivo metabolism. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 33, 446–455. doi: 10.5713/ajas.19.0596
Angulo, J., Mahecha, L., Yepes, S. A., Bustamante, G., Jaramillo, H., Valencia, E., et al. (2012a). Nutritional evaluation of fruit and vegetable waste as feedstuff for diets of lactating Holstein cows. J. Environ. Manag. 95, S210–S214. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.050
Angulo, J., Mahecha, L., Yepes, S. A., Yepes, A. M., Bustamante, G., Jaramillo, H., et al. (2012b). Quantitative and nutritional characterization of fruit and vegetable waste from marketplace: a potential use as bovine feedstuff? J. Environ. Manag. 95, S203–S209. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.09.022
AOAC (1995). “Official method of analysis of AOAC 991.43,” in Total, soluble, and insoluble dietary fibre in foods. 14th ed. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: AOAC International.
AOAC (2005). “Official methods of analysis of AOAC” in AOAC international. 18th ed (Gaithersburg, MD, USA).
Arend, F. A., Murdoch, G. K., Doumit, M. E., and Chibisa, G. E. (2022). Inclusion of grape pomace in finishing cattle diets: carcass traits, meat quality and fatty acid composition. Animals 12:2597. doi: 10.3390/ani12192597
Artuso-Ponte, V., Pastor, A., and Andratsch, M. (2020). “The effects of plant extracts on the immune system of livestock: the isoquinoline alkaloids model” in Feed additives. Academic press. eds. P. Florou-Paneri, E. Christaki, and I. Giannenas (Cambridge, MA (USA)), 295–310.
Azabou, S., Louati, I., Taheur, F. B., Nasri, M., and Mechichi, T. (2020). Towards sustainable management of tomato pomace through the recovery of valuable compounds and sequential production of low-cost biosorbent. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 27, 39402–39412. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09835-5
Bakshi, M. P. S., Wadhwa, M., and Makkar, H. P. S. (2016). Waste to worth: vegetable wastes as animal feed. CAB Rev. 11, 1–26. doi: 10.1079/PAVSNNR201611012
Bennett, A., Dubey, S., Lee, W. T. K., Damen, B., and Bucatariu, C. (2022). FAO regional strategy on food loss and waste reduction in Asia and the Pacific. Bangkok: FAO.
Blasi, F., Trovarelli, V., Mangiapelo, L., Ianni, F., and Cossignani, L. (2024). Grape pomace for feed enrichment to improve the quality of animal-based foods. Food Secur. 13:3541. doi: 10.3390/foods13223541
Brand-Williams, W., Cuvelier, M. E., and Berset, C. (1995). Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 28, 25–30. doi: 10.1016/S0023-6438(95)80008-5
Brenes, A., Viveros, A., Chamorro, S., and Arija, I. (2016). Use of polyphenol-rich grape by-products in monogastric nutrition. A review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 211, 1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.09.016
Budiarto, K., Andrini, A., Budiyati, E., Mariana, D. B., Martasari, C., Mas’udah, S., et al. (2024). Bioactive phytochemical contents on fruit Peel of several Citrus species. BIO Web of Conferences. 91:01016. doi: 10.1051/bioconf/20249101016
Buratti, S., Cappa, C., Benedetti, S., and Giovanelli, G. (2020). Influence of cooking conditions on nutritional properties and sensory characteristics interpreted by E-senses: case-study on selected vegetables. Food Secur. 9:607. doi: 10.3390/foods9050607
Carbone, K., Amoriello, T., and Iadecola, R. (2020). Exploitation of kiwi juice pomace for the recovery of natural antioxidants through microwave-assisted extraction. Agriculture 10:435. doi: 10.3390/agriculture10100435
Cassani, L., and Gomez-Zavaglia, A. (2022). Sustainable food systems in fruits and vegetables food supply chains. Front. Nutr. 9:829061. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.829061
Chiva-Blanch, G., and Visioli, F. (2012). Polyphenols and health: moving beyond antioxidants. J. Berry Res. 2, 63–71. doi: 10.3233/JBR-2012-028
Costa, G. N., Tonon, R. V., Mellinger-Silva, C., Galdeano, M. C., Iacomini, M., Santiago, M. C., et al. (2019). Grape seed pomace as a valuable source of antioxidant fibers. J. Sci. Food Agric. 99, 4593–4601. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.9698
Dal Bosco, A., Mourvaki, E., Cardinali, R., Servili, M., Sebastiani, B., Ruggeri, S., et al. (2012). Effect of dietary supplementation with olive pomaces on the performance and meat quality of growing rabbits. Meat Sci. 92, 783–788. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.07.001
Davidson, M. H., and McDonald, A. (1998). Fiber: forms and functions. Nutr. Res. 18, 617–624. doi: 10.1016/S0271-5317(98)00048-7
de Oliveira, M. M., Lago, A., and Dal’Magro, G. P. (2021). Food loss and waste in the context of the circular economy: a systematic review. J. Clean. Prod. 294:126284. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126284
Deng, Q., Penner, M. H., and Zhao, Y. (2011). Chemical composition of dietary fiber and polyphenols of five different varieties of wine grape pomace skins. Food Res. Int. 44, 2712–2720. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2011.05.026
Duo, Z., Toth, D. J., and Westendorf, L. M. (2018). Food waste for livestock feeding: feasibility, safety, and sustainability implications. Glob. Food Secur. 17, 154–161. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2017.12.003
Durmic, Z., and Blache, D. (2012). Bioactive plants and plant products: effects on animal function, health and welfare. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 176, 150–162. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2012.07.018
Fulgencio, S.-C. (2011). Dietary fiber as a carrier of dietary antioxidants: an essential physiological function. J. Agric. Food Chem. 59, 43–49. doi: 10.1021/jf1036596
Garcıa, A. J., Esteban, M. B., Marquez, M. C., and Ramos, P. (2005). Biodegradable municipal solid waste: characterization and potential use as animal feedstuffs. Waste Manag. 25, 780–787. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2005.01.006
Gessner, D. K., Ringseis, R., and Eder, K. (2017). Potential of plant polyphenols to combat oxidative stress and inflammatory processes in farm animals. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 101, 605–628. doi: 10.1111/jpn.12579
Goliomytis, M., Kostaki, A., Avgoulas, G., Lantzouraki, D. Z., Siapi, E., Zoumpoulakis, P., et al. (2018). Dietary supplementation with orange pulp (Citrus sinensis) improves egg yolk oxidative stability in laying hens. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 244, 28–35. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2018.07.015
Goñi, I., Brenes, A., Centeno, C., Viveros, A., Saura-Calixto, F., Rebolé, A., et al. (2007). Effect of dietary grape pomace and vitamin E on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and susceptibility to meat lipid oxidation in chickens. Poult. Sci. 86, 508–516. doi: 10.1093/ps/86.3.508
Hashemi, S. R., and Davoodi, H. (2011). Herbal plants and their derivatives as growth and health promoters in animal nutrition. Vet. Res. Commun. 35, 169–180. doi: 10.1007/s11259-010-9458-2
Henríquez, C., Speisky, H., Chiffelle, I., Valenzuela, T., Araya, M., Simpson, R., et al. (2010). Development of an ingredient containing apple peel, as a source of polyphenols and dietary fiber. J. Food Sci. 75, H172–H181. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01700.x
Hipsley, E. H. (1953). Dietary Fiber and pregnancy Toxaemia. BMJ 2, 420–422. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.4833.420
Hooper, L. V., Littman, D. R., and Macpherson, A. J. (2012). Interactions between the microbiota and the immune system. Science 336, 1268–1273. doi: 10.1126/science.1223490
Hossain, M. E., Ko, S. Y., and Yang, C. J. (2012). Dietary supplementation of green tea by-products on growth performance, meat quality, blood parameters and immunity in finishing pigs. J. Med. Plants Res. 6, 2458–2467. doi: 10.5897/JMPR11.1643
Jha, R., Fouhse, J. M., Tiwari, U. P., Li, L., and Willing, B. P. (2019). Dietary fiber and intestinal health of monogastric animals. Front. Vet. Sci. 6:48. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00048
Kamboh, A. A., Arain, M. A., Mughal, M. J., Zaman, A., Arain, Z. M., and Soomro, A. H. (2015). Flavonoids: health promoting phytochemicals for animal production—a review. J. Anim. Health Prod. 3, 6–13. doi: 10.14737/journal.jahp/2015/3.1.6.13
Keshri, J., Chen, Y., Pinto, R., Kroupitski, Y., Weinberg, Z. G., and Sela Saldinger, S. (2018). Microbiome dynamics during ensiling of corn with and without Lactobacillus plantarum inoculant. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 102, 4025–4037. doi: 10.1007/s00253-018-8903-y
Laufenberg, G., Kunz, B., and Nystroem, M. (2003). Transformation of vegetable waste into value added products: (A) the upgrading concept; (B) practical implementations. Bioresour. Technol. 87, 167–198. doi: 10.1016/S0960-8524(02)00167-0
Lipiński, K., Mazur, M., Antoszkiewicz, Z., and Purwin, C. (2017). Polyphenols in monogastric nutrition – a review. Ann. Anim. Sci. 17, 41–58. doi: 10.1515/aoas-2016-0042
Ma, J., Fan, X., Ma, Z., Huang, X., Tang, M., Yin, F., et al. (2023). Silage additives improve fermentation quality, aerobic stability and rumen degradation in mixed silage composed of amaranth and corn straw. Front. Plant Sci. 14:1189747. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1189747
Mejía-Avellaneda, L. F., Suárez, H., Jiménez, H., and Mesa, L. (2022). Challenges and opportunities for the production of lactic acid bacteria inoculants aimed for ensiling processes. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 42, 1028–1044. doi: 10.1080/07388551.2021.1988508
Molist, F., van Oostruma, M., Pérez, J. F., Mateos, G. G., Nyachoti, C. M., and van der Aar, P. J. (2014). Relevance of functional properties of dietary fibre in diets for weanling pigs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 189, 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.12.013
Nirmal, N. P., Khanashyam, A. C., Mundanat, A. S., Shah, K., Babu, K. S., Thorakkattu, P., et al. (2023). Valorization of fruit waste for bioactive compounds and their applications in the food industry. Food Secur. 12:556. doi: 10.3390/foods12030556
Pop, C., Suharoschi, R., and Pop, O. L. (2022). Dietary Fiber and prebiotic compounds in fruits and vegetables food waste. Sustain. For. 13:7219. doi: 10.3390/su13137219
Regulation 152/2009. (2009). Commission regulation (EC) no 152/2009 of 27 January 2009 laying down the methods of sampling and analysis for the official control of feed (text with EEA relevance). OJ L 54. Available online at: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2009/152/oj (Accessed September 10, 2024).
Sagar, A. N., Pareek, S., Sharma, S., Elhadi, M. Y., and Lobo, G. M. (2018). Fruit and vegetable waste: bioactive compounds, their extraction, and possible utilization. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 17, 512–531. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12330
Sahoo, A., Sarkar, S., Lal, B., Kumawat, P., Sharma, S., and De, K. (2021). Utilization of fruit and vegetable waste as an alternative feed resource for sustainable and eco-friendly sheep farming. Waste Manag. 128, 232–242. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.04.050
Šeregelj, V., Šaponjac, T. V., Pezo, L., Kojić, J., Cvetković, B., and Ilic, N. (2024). Analysis of antioxidant potential of fruit and vegetable juices available in Serbian markets. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 30, 472–484. doi: 10.1177/10820132231158961
Serra, V., Salvatori, G., and Pastorelli, G. (2021). Dietary polyphenol supplementation in food producing animals: effects on the quality of derived products. Animals 11:401. doi: 10.3390/ani11020401
Sieminska-Kuczer, A., Szymanska-Chargot, M., and Zdunek, A. (2021). Recent advances in interactions between polyphenols and plant cell wall polysaccharides as studied using an adsorption technique. Food Chem. 373:131487. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131487
Singleton, A. L., and Rossi, J. A. (1965). Colorimetry of Total Phenolics with Phosphomolybdic-Phosphotungstic acid reagents. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 16, 144–158. doi: 10.5344/ajev.1965.16.3.144
Slavin, J. (2013). Fiber and prebiotics: mechanisms and health benefits. Nutrients 5, 1417–1435. doi: 10.3390/nu5041417
Sogi, D. S., Siddiq, M., Greiby, I., and Dolan, K. D. (2013). Total phenolics, antioxidant activity, and functional properties of ‘Tommy Atkins’ mango peel and kernel as affected by drying methods. Food Chem. 141, 2649–2655. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.05.053
Sudha, M. L., Baskaran, V., and Leelavathi, K. (2007). Apple pomace as a source of dietary fiber and polyphenols and its effect on the rheological characteristics and cake making. Food Chem. 104, 686–692. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.12.016
Sun, X., Dou, Z., Gerald, C. S., and Hu, B. (2024). Bioprocessing to upcycle agro-industrial and food wastes into high-nutritional value animal feed for sustainable food and agriculture systems. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 201:107325. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107325
Tayengwa, T., Chikwanha, O. C., Neethling, J., Dugan, M. E. R., Mutsvangwa, T., and Mapiye, C. (2020). Polyunsaturated fatty acid, volatile and sensory profiles of beef from steers fed Citrus pulp or grape pomace. Food Res. Int. 139:109923. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109923
Tedesco, D. E. A., Scarioni, S., Tava, A., Panseri, S., and Zuorro, A. (2021). Fruit and vegetable wholesale market waste: safety and nutritional characterisation for their potential re-use in livestock nutrition. Sustain. For. 13:9478. doi: 10.3390/su13169478
Tian, X., Li, D., Zhao, X., Xiao, Z., Sun, J., Yuan, T., et al. (2023). Dietary grape pomace extract supplementation improved meat quality, antioxidant capacity, and immune performance in finishing pigs. Front. Microbiol. 14:1116022. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1116022
Trowell, H. (1976). Definition of dietary Fiber and hypotheses that it is a protective factor in certain diseases. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 29, 417–427. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/29.4.417
Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B., and Lewis, B. A. (1991). Symposium: carbohydrate methodology, metabolism, and nutritional implications in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 74, 3583–3597. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
Vilarino, M. V., Franco, C., and Quarrington, C. (2017). Food loss and waste reduction as an integral part of a circular economy. Front. Environ. Sci. 5. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2017.00021
Wadhwa, M., Bakshi, M. P. S., and Makkar, H. P. S. (2015). Wastes to worth: value added products from fruit and vegetable wastes. CAB Rev. 10, 1–25. doi: 10.1079/PAVSNNR201510043
Wang, Y., Pan, S., Yin, J., Feng, H., Wang, M., and Chen, T. (2022). Resource potential and global warming potential of fruit and vegetable waste in China based on different treatment strategies. Waste Manag. 140, 225–232. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.11.016
Wijngaard, H. H., Rößle, C., and Brunton, N. (2009). A survey of Irish fruit and vegetable waste and by-products as a source of polyphenolic antioxidants. Food Chem. 116, 202–207. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.02.033
Yang, J., Wang, H. P., Zhou, L., and Xu, C. F. (2012). Effect of dietary fiber on constipation: a meta analysis. World J. Gastroenterol. 18, 7378–7383. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i48.7378
Yohannes, M., Kechero, Y., and Tadele, Y. (2024a). Comparative nutrient utilization efficiency on diets containing combined fruit wastes in view of browser/grazer dichotomy in Ethiopian settings: Woyito-Guji bucks versus Doyo-Gena rams. Cogent Food Agric. 10. doi: 10.1080/23311932.2023.2296132
Keywords: food waste recovery, circular economy, functional feed, dietary fiber, antioxidants
Citation: Tedesco DEA, Guerrini A and Giovanelli G (2025) Fruit and vegetable biowaste as a source of functional nutritional components for animal feed. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 9:1512577. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1512577
Edited by:
Shalini Gaur Rudra, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, IndiaReviewed by:
Gerardo Mendez-Zamora, Autonomous University of Nuevo León, MexicoRoland Ebel, Montana State University, United States
Copyright © 2025 Tedesco, Guerrini and Giovanelli. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Doriana E. A. Tedesco, ZG9yaWFuYS50ZWRlc2NvQHVuaW1pLml0