SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Sustain. Food Syst.

Sec. Social Movements, Institutions and Governance

Volume 9 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1559503

A Systematic review on selection and comparison of holistic agricultural sustainability assessment approaches

Provisionally accepted
  • Shiraz University, Shiraz, Fars, Iran

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

General objective of this paper is to develop a methodological approach for comparing and selecting agricultural sustainability assessment frameworks introduced by scholars. Several sub-objectives have been considered, including "identifying and explaining holistic agricultural sustainability assessment frameworks", "identifying and explaining comparison criteria of agricultural sustainability assessment frameworks", "scoring agricultural sustainability assessment frameworks with respect to comparison criteria", "evaluation of agricultural sustainability assessment frameworks with respect to comparison criteria", and finally, "selection of the most appropriate framework". The results of prioritization and comparison of the frameworks on the basis of comparison criteria using normalized scores and Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) demonstrate that, in general, Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) framework has a higher score than other frameworks. Although the present review shows that MCDA (2.144) has a higher overall score than other frameworks, it does not mean that this framework should be considered as one-size-fits-all framework in the field of agricultural sustainability assessment since other methods also have high scores in some (normative, systemic, and procedural) dimensions. For example, Farm-Level Indicators on New Topics (0.351), Sustainability Solution Space (0.351), and Sustainability Assessment of Farming and the Environment (0.267) frameworks have obtained high scores in systemic dimension. Similarly, Ecological Footprint Tool (0.699), Life Cycle Assessment Tool (0.684), and System Dynamic Simulation Tool (0.671) have obtained remarkable scores in the normative dimension, indicating the potential capacity of these frameworks in agricultural sustainability assessments.

Keywords: evaluation criteria, Assessment frameworks, agricultural sustainability, sustainability indicators, Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA)

Received: 12 Jan 2025; Accepted: 29 May 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Valizadeh and Hayati. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Dariush Hayati, Shiraz University, Shiraz, 71345, Fars, Iran

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.