ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Sustain. Food Syst.
Sec. Agricultural and Food Economics
Volume 9 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1560865
This article is part of the Research TopicFuture Paths for Local and Alternative Food SystemsView all 4 articles
Mechanism and simulation analysis of cross-regional vegetable production and marketing docking in big cities based on evolutionary game
Provisionally accepted- 1Shandong Women's University, Jinan, China
- 2Ludong University, Yantai, Shandong Province, China
- 3The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Non-local vegetables have become a crucial source of vegetable supply for major cities, establishing stable production-marketing linkage mechanisms between large cities and external vegetableproducing regions is now imperative. Existing research has primarily examined, from a static perspective, the mechanisms by which government interventions influence the cross-regional alignment of agricultural production and marketing, yet it has not explored the dynamic characteristics and evolutionary patterns that emerge in the cross-regional integration of vegetable supply chains. This paper aims to establish a stable and healthy cross-regional vegetable production and sales docking mechanism. Based on evolutionary game theory, it constructs a tripartite evolutionary game model involving "government guidance -farmer participation -wholesaler operation" to explore the behavioral strategies and mutual influence mechanisms of the three parties.Through simulation analysis, the study investigates the impact of these three parties on the efficient and stable operation of the cross-regional production and sales docking chain. The research resultsshow that the level of government support and subsidies for wholesalers and farmers, influence the strategic behavior of wholesalers and farmers. Appropriate supervision and penalties are conducive to the consistency of decision-making behavior between the government and wholesalers, while excessive supervision and penalties can lead to increased costs that wholesalers cannot bear, resulting in non-responsive behavior from wholesalers and causing a vicious cycle in the operation of the production and sales docking chain.A key contribution of this paper lies in its application of an evolutionary game model to describe the decision-making processes and adaptive learning behaviors of the three principal actors-government, wholesalers, and farmers-throughout the cross-regional production-marketing integration process, and to trace their dynamic evolution over time. By framing these interactions under conditions of bounded rationality, the model both analyzes and predicts the collective strategies that emerge among stakeholders, thereby furnishing essential theoretical insights for strengthening integration and securing vegetable supply. In doing so, it extends existing agricultural supply theory and offers actionable guidance for orderly production planning in major vegetable-producing regions and for accurately aligning output with primary consumption markets.
Keywords: Cross-regional production, Marketing docking, evolutionary game, Simulation analysis, Big cities
Received: 15 Jan 2025; Accepted: 15 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Wang, Liu, Dong and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Na Wang, Shandong Women's University, Jinan, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.