ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sustain. Food Syst.

Sec. Social Movements, Institutions and Governance

Volume 9 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1563045

This article is part of the Research TopicFood System Resilience, Disaster Preparedness & ResponseView all 5 articles

Planning for Food System Disruptions: Lessons Learned about Resilience Attributes from Local Governments' Emergency Food Response Efforts

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
  • 2Bloomberg Center for Government Excellence, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
  • 3Center for a Livable Future, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Local governments in the United States are critical emergency food response actors during disruptions. They are perceived as being well-positioned to provide food, connect with community partners, and inform residents. A variety of resilience-related factors (referred to here as resilience attributes) influence the ease and pace of their responses. This exploratory study investigated how resilience attributes were associated with five local governments' emergency food response efforts during the early phases (April 2020-January 2021) of the COVID-19 pandemic and the facilitators and barriers to exhibiting higher levels of these resilience attributes. Participants in this study were members of the Food System Resilience Community of Practice (CoP), which was a small group of local government stakeholders convened and facilitated by the Center for a Livable Future and the Bloomberg Center for Government Excellence at Johns Hopkins University. We used a mixedmethod embedded design for the research: we collected survey data (April 2020) before the sixmonth CoP and completed semi-structured in-depth interviews (December 2020 and January 2021) after the CoP. We recorded, transcribed, and analyzed the interviews using the phronetic iterative approach and combined the quantitative and qualitative data using an analysis matrix. We found that preparedness, connectivity, capital reserves, diversity, redundancy, flexibility, and equity were a part of the local governments' emergency response efforts, and having higher levels of these attributes was supportive of work. We also identified cross-cutting facilitators and barriers that helped or hindered local governments in exhibiting these attributes. By examining five local governments' emergency food response efforts during the COVID-19 pandemic, we are able to better understand how resilience attributes were associated with efforts and what actions can help or hinder local 2 governments in displaying these attributes. From this, we can identify programmatic and policy opportunities that can help local governments better prepare for and be resilient to future crises.

Keywords: Food system resilience, Local Government, Resilience attributes, food planning, Equity

Received: 18 Jan 2025; Accepted: 28 May 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Moore, Burke, Biehl and Neff. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: E.R.H. Moore, Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.