ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Sustain. Food Syst.
Sec. Agricultural and Food Economics
Volume 9 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1563938
Decision analysis considering the resilience level of the food supply chain under the risk of demand disruption
Provisionally accepted- 1Jinan Liangong Testing Technology Co., Ltd, Jinan, China
- 2Business School, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, China
- 3Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, China
- 4Key Laboratory of Digital Empowerment Economic Development, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, China
- 5China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation, Shandong Petroleum Branch, Jinan, China
- 6Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, Liaoning Province, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
In the context of demand disruption, food supply chain resilience not only helps enterprises maintain stability in the face of uncertainty and risk but also enables them to better satisfy customer demand, reduce costs, enhance competitiveness, and promote sustainable development. In order to analyze the resilient input and coordination of the food supply chain under the risk of demand disruption. This paper uses game theory as the methodological basis of the research to construct a game model between manufacturers and retailers. This model considers the impact of different demand interruption risks and product order quantities on food supply chain resilience input, manufacturer profits, and retailer profits. And analyzed the coordination mechanism of cost sharing contracts and revenue sharing contracts on the food supply chain. The results show that, under the risk of demand disruption, the cost-sharing contract is more suitable than the benefit-sharing contract for harmonizing the profits of food supply chain parties. Furthermore, the manufacturer's profit is negatively related to the probability of demand disruption, while the retailer's profit is positively related to this probability when the product order quantity is low, but negatively related when the product order quantity is high. food supply chain resilience input are positively correlated with the probability of demand disruption. Furthermore, during sensitivity analysis, the profits of both the manufacturer and retailer exhibit a U-shaped fluctuation, initially decreasing and then increasing, as the capacity restoration factor grows.
Keywords: food supply chain resilience, demand disruption risk, Cost-sharing contracts, benefit-sharing contracts, capacity restoration
Received: 07 Feb 2025; Accepted: 20 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Liu, Kang, Lu, Dong, Xiaochun, Li, Long, Yang and Mao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Jianyu Liu, Jinan Liangong Testing Technology Co., Ltd, Jinan, China
Ruihai Dong, China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation, Shandong Petroleum Branch, Jinan, China
Luo Xiaochun, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, 210016, Liaoning Province, China
Ping Long, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.