ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Sustain. Food Syst.
Sec. Social Movements, Institutions and Governance
Volume 9 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1564080
This article is part of the Research TopicFood System Resilience, Disaster Preparedness & ResponseView all 8 articles
Farmers and Ranchers Weave the Social Fabric Shaping Wildfire Resilience
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Human Ecology, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States
- 2Farmer Campus, Carbondale, Colorado, United States
- 3Agricultural Sustainability Institute, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Wildfires are one of the most significant threats to California’s food and farming systems, endangering a state that produces diverse crops and livestock critical to national and global food security. This study examines the role of social fabric—mutual aid, cooperation, and collective action—in shaping wildfire adaptive capacities among California farmers and ranchers. Using survey data from 403 producers directly impacted by wildfires between 2017 and 2023, we conducted regression analyses to identify how social, operational, and demographic factors influence adaptive behaviors, including making changes, wildfire mitigation practices, knowledge acquisition, and farm continuity. A key finding of this study is the role of the social fabric—an intricate web of social relationships—mutual aid, and collective action—in supporting resilience. Farmers who are deeply integrated into their communities and actively participate in mutual aid demonstrate a higher capacity to adapt to wildfire threats. This suggests that the strength and durability of farmers’ community ties may be a critical factor in their ability to innovate and apply effective risk management strategies. Knowledge also emerged as a central driver of adaptation, with frequent wildfire exposure enhancing experiential learning and confidence in risk management. Ecological and diversified farming practices, alongside direct-to-consumer markets, were associated with higher rates of adaptation and stronger social networks. Financial and land ownership factors, including access to social safety nets and off-farm income, further supported long-term mitigation efforts. However, the cumulative burden of adaptive actions, compounded by social influences like peer decisions to quit farming, led some producers to consider exiting agriculture, exposing vulnerabilities within the food system. In light of these findings, we recommend strengthening farmer networks through cooperative models, such as fire-safe councils and farmer-led preparedness groups, while incentivizing sustainable practices like agroecological and mosaic landscapes to buffer wildfire impacts and promote resilience. Agriculture, we propose, represents an underexplored but critical facet of broader wildfire resilience. This study contributes to the discourse on food system resilience by highlighting the interplay between social fabric, adaptive capacity, and sustainable agriculture in the face of climate-induced disasters.
Keywords: wildfires, social fabric, disaster resilience, Farmers, Ranchers, Ecological agriculture
Received: 21 Jan 2025; Accepted: 27 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Pinzón and Galt. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Natalia Pinzón, Department of Human Ecology, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, 95616, California, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.