Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sustain. Food Syst.

Sec. Land, Livelihoods and Food Security

Volume 9 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1570962

How Can Grain Price Support Policies Enhance Stable and Increased Wheat Production? A Risk Aversion and Cost Saving Perspective

Provisionally accepted
Sisi  ChenSisi Chen*Guangsi  LiGuangsi Li*
  • Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, Nanjing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The food price support policy aimed at stability has become a key strategy for safeguarding food security. Since its implementation, wheat production in China has seen significant growth. However, the economic benefits from wheat farming have not increased in tandem, leading to the phenomenon of "increased production without increased income".Thus, the effects of food price support policies on wheat production and the incentive mechanisms driving this change remain insufficiently studied.This paper provides a comprehensive theoretical and empirical analysis of how food price support policies influence the incentive mechanisms driving wheat production, focusing on the mediating role of farmers' decision-making behavior. Based on Schultz's "rational man" principle of self-utility maximization, and from the perspectives of risk-sharing and cost-saving, the study divides the incentive mechanisms guiding farmers' production decisions into three areas: price stabilization, income stabilization, and comprehensive cost savings. Meanwhile, empirical connections between price support policies, farmers' decision-making, and wheat production are examined. Empirical tests are conducted using provincial panel data from 15 major wheat-producing provinces in China (2000China ( -2021)), employing dynamic difference-in-differences and mediation effect models.The study shows that the price support policy has significantly boosted wheat production. Dynamic effect analysis indicates that the policy has a short-term impact on improving wheat yield. Regional heterogeneity analysis reveals that provinces respond differently to the policy, with varying levels of sustainability in the increased wheat production. This variation is mainly due to differences in agricultural resource distribution and cropping structures across regions. Mechanism analysis suggests that the policy effectively incentivizes wheat production by stabilizing market price fluctuations, ensuring stable farmer income, and reducing overall production costs.Discussion: Based on the above findings, it is recommended that, while continuing to implement the price support policy, more targeted policy adjustments be made to reflect the specific characteristics of different regions. Additionally, strengthening agricultural infrastructure, establishing diversified income subsidy mechanisms for farmers, and optimizing production input structures are essential for enhancing the long-term effectiveness and sustainability of the policy. This study offers insights for policymakers, agricultural managers, and researchers, providing insights into improving sustainable food production in China and other regions with similar contexts.

Keywords: Price support policy, production increase incentive mechanism, farmer decision-making behavior, sustainable agriculture, China

Received: 04 Feb 2025; Accepted: 30 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Chen and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Sisi Chen, Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, Nanjing, China
Guangsi Li, Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, Nanjing, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.