PERSPECTIVE article
Front. Sustain. Food Syst.
Sec. Land, Livelihoods and Food Security
Volume 9 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1602755
This article is part of the Research TopicIndigenous and Local Knowledge as a Catalyst for Sustainable Agriculture and Food SecurityView all 9 articles
Native language resources can illuminate global darkspots in utilized plant species and reduce data shortfalls
Provisionally accepted- 1Centre for Environmental Sciences, University of Hasselt, Diepenbeek, Belgium
- 2Regional Institute of Community Well-being and Ecology (RICE), Hanoi, Vietnam
- 3Centro de Investigaciones en Geografía Ambiental UNAM, Morelia, México, Mexico
- 4Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Gazi University, Ankara, Ankara, Türkiye
- 5Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Center, Frankfurt, Germany, Frankfurt, Germany
- 6Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Hesse, Germany
- 7Conservation of Natural Resources, The University of Transdisciplinary Health Sciences and Technology, Bangalore, India
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The 2022 IPBES Sustainable Use of Wild Species Assessment states that humans collectively utilize about 31,100 plant species globally, roughly 7 percent of all described plant species. This is a conservative estimate acknowledged in the Assessment but is not clearly mentioned in the Summary for Policymakers report. This number is drawn from the Kew’s State of the World’s Plants and Fungi Reports, where the knowledge gap of species used and valued by humans in many regions (plant darkspots) is acknowledged. This article discusses this gap and its perpetuation while highlighting that Indigenous, Local, and Traditional Ecological Knowledge can remediate such global biodiversity data shortfalls. We propose that oral and written native language resources could enhance understanding and data coverage of species use, especially in biodiversity darkspots. To support this, we examine how native language resources have supported the documentation of species use in five countries - India, Brazil, Türkiye, Mexico, and Vietnam. Finally, we discuss barriers and opportunities, and call for policymakers, data managers, and other beneficiaries to systematically include native language resource insights, starting from the local and national levels and moving toward global aggregation.
Keywords: IPLC, indigenous and local knowledge (ILK), Traditional ecological knowledge (TEK), plant use knowledge, native language resources, plant darkspot
Received: 30 Mar 2025; Accepted: 26 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Nguyen, Monroy Sais, Per, Rabeschini and Kareem. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Tuan Nguyen, Centre for Environmental Sciences, University of Hasselt, Diepenbeek, Belgium
Ana Sofía Monroy Sais, Centro de Investigaciones en Geografía Ambiental UNAM, Morelia, México, Mexico
Esra Per, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Gazi University, Ankara, 06500, Ankara, Türkiye
Gabriela Rabeschini, Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Center, Frankfurt, Germany, Frankfurt, Germany
Abdul Kareem, Conservation of Natural Resources, The University of Transdisciplinary Health Sciences and Technology, Bangalore, India
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.