Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sustain. Food Syst.

Sec. Land, Livelihoods and Food Security

Volume 9 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1604101

Exploring soil organic carbon fractions, stocks, and carbon management index across land uses in subtropical ecosystems of Tripura, India

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Division of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • 2Division of Agronomy, ICAR– Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • 3Division of Environmental Sciences, ICAR– Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • 4Department of Plant Production, College of Food and Agricultural Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
  • 5Department of Agricultural Engineering, College of Food and Agricultural Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
  • 6Structural Diagnostics and Analysis Research Group, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Pécs 7622,, Hungary

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Soil organic carbon (SOC) is vital for ecosystem health, improving soil quality, enhancing productivity, and acting as a significant carbon sink for climate change mitigation. Understanding the distribution of SOC across various land uses is essential for developing effective land management strategies that enhance soil health and carbon sequestration. This study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity of SOC fractions, including readily oxidizable carbon, total organic carbon (TOC), carbon stocks, and carbon management index (CMI), across different land use systems (LUSs) in Tripura, India. Soil samples were collected from horticultural and agricultural LUSs (oil palm, litchi, citrus, guava, rubber, ginger, rice–fallow, vegetable cowpea–rice–maize, vegetable cowpea–rice–lentil, vegetable cowpea–rice–mustard, and uncultivated), at five soil depths: 0–15 cm, 15–30 cm, 30–60 cm, 60–75 cm, and 75–100 cm. The samples were analyzed for various physical and chemical properties, SOC fractions, carbon stock, and CMI to assess the role of LUSs in managing soil carbon content. Significant differences were observed in SOC fractions, carbon stock, and CMI across the LUSs. Litchi LUSs exhibited the highest organic carbon content (16.6 g kg⁻¹) and TOC (22.2 g kg⁻¹) at 0–15 cm, while uncultivated land recorded the lowest values. SOC fractions showed a significant decrease with increasing soil depth from 0 to 100 cm. Litchi orchards had the highest average SOC stock (41.2 Mg ha⁻¹) and readily oxidizable carbon (1.72 g kg⁻¹), followed by rubber and oil palm. Rubber showed the highest lability index, followed by litchi and oil palm with values of 1.47, 1.41 and 1.39, respectively. Litchi and rubber exhibited the highest carbon pool index values, indicating substantial carbon retention. Furthermore, litchi, rubber, and oil palm exhibited significantly higher CMI values, with 245, 238, and 222, respectively. The study emphasizes the significant role of different LUSs, particularly horticultural land use, in enhancing SOC fractions and carbon sequestration. The findings suggest that integrating such LUSs, like litchi and rubber, can contribute significantly to improving soil quality and implementing effective climate change mitigation strategies.

Keywords: Carbon management index, carbon stocks, Land uses, Northeast Hill region, Soil Organic Carbon

Received: 01 Apr 2025; Accepted: 15 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Meena, Manjaiah, Sharma, Purakayastha, Das, Bana, GAWDIYA, Yadav, Saini, Kumar, El-Hendawy, Mattar and Salem. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
K M Manjaiah, Division of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
Mohamed A. Mattar, Department of Agricultural Engineering, College of Food and Agricultural Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
Ali Salem, Structural Diagnostics and Analysis Research Group, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Pécs 7622,, Hungary

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.