Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sustain. Food Syst.

Sec. Agricultural and Food Economics

Volume 9 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1608860

Developing Indicators to Assess the Viability of Small- and Medium-Scale Farms: A Case Study of Market Gardening Farms at the Regional Scale

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Plant Ecology, Eco-physiology, and Sustainable Agriculture. ELI-Agronomy, UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
  • 2Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Walloon Brabant, Belgium

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Small-and medium-scale market gardening plays an important role in transitioning towards a sustainable food system, yet its viability remains underexplored. This study assesses the viability of small- and medium-scale market gardening farms in the Coeur de Condroz region (Belgium) using field data from 17 farms. We adopted Landais’ (1998) framework to define viability, which is conceptualized as a sub concept of sustainability, alongside reproducibility, livability, and transmissibility. A set of five indicators; land productivity, labor productivity, gross added value, estimated profit, and a risk index were developed to analyze viability.Results reveal significant variability among farms. Some achieve viability, while others rely on off-farm income. Three distinct farm profiles were identified based on viability indicators; one composed of less performant farms and two of viable farms with different strategies. Key drivers of viability were highlighted to include greenhouse surface, crop diversity, and years since establishment. Additionally, farms integrating complementary on-farm activities exhibited lower risk of cost but lower productivity per hectare.By redefining viability assessment methods and engaging directly with farmers, this research offers valuable insights into the factors shaping small-and medium-scale market gardening farms. Findings indicate that viability cannot be measured through financial indicators alone but must consider broader socio-economic dimensions. Additionally, farmers’ perceptions of viability vary, with some incorporating quality of life into their assessment. This study demonstrates that market gardening can be viable through diverse strategies, despite limited public financial support. It offers practical recommendations for research, and also highlights the potential of applying this methodology to cross-regional longitudinal studies, as well as the need to investigate the relationship between perceived and measured viability.

Keywords: agroecology, Market gardening, local food system, farm viability, viability indicators

Received: 09 Apr 2025; Accepted: 07 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Heine, Gaspart and Biot. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Nicolas Biot, Plant Ecology, Eco-physiology, and Sustainable Agriculture. ELI-Agronomy, UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.