Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sustain. Food Syst.

Sec. Crop Biology and Sustainability

Volume 9 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1614139

This article is part of the Research TopicEnhancing Soil and Crop Resilience: Strategies Against Climate-Driven Salinization and DegradationView all 9 articles

Organic fertilizer in combination with zeolite enhanced maize yield with lower greenhouse gas emissions in sandy loam soil in North China

Provisionally accepted
Xuexia  WangXuexia Wang1Jiachen  WangJiachen Wang1Peirui  YanPeirui Yan2Qiang  ZuoQiang Zuo1Qinping  SunQinping Sun1*Dongsheng  LiuDongsheng Liu1*
  • 1Institute of Plant Nutrition and Resources, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing, China
  • 2Soil and Fertilizer Workstation of Mangshi City, Yunnan Province, Mangshi, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

There is limited knowledge about how co-applying organic fertilizer and zeolite influences maize yield and soil greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in sandy loam soil. In the present study, a 3-year maize field experiment was conducted on a sandy loam soil in the North China Plain with five treatments: no added fertilizer (CK), synthetic fertilizer (SF), organic fertilizer replacing 30% synthetic N fertilizer (OF), synthetic fertilizer with zeolite (ZSF), and organic fertilizer with zeolite (ZOF). Results showed that, compared with the SF treatment, the ZOF treatment significantly increased yield by 14.72–23.61% in each of the 3 years, ZSF by 13.91– 15.59% in 2022 and 2023, and OF by 16.92% in 2023. Compared with ZSF, the cumulative CO2 emission was significantly increased by 4.52% in OF in 2023. Compared with SF, the average N2O emission flux and cumulative (over 2022 and 2023) N2O emissions were significantly reduced by 6.74–8.23% and 6.10–8.79% by OF, 9.29–11.86% and 9.23–10.85% by ZSF, and 7.59–11.24% and 12.27–16.06% by ZOF, respectively. Compared with SF, the total global warming potential (GWP) was significantly lower by 4.78% in ZOF in 2023, the greenhouse gas intensity (GHGI) was significantly lower over the 3 years of trials by 6.45–15.31% and 14.16–21.06% in treatments ZSF and ZOF, respectively, and was significantly lower by 10.53– 13.13% in OF in 2022 and 2023. Compared with SF, the levels of available potassium and phosphorus content, dissolved organic carbon content, soil β-glucosidase activity, and microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen concentration in the ZOF treatment were significantly higher by 7.34%, 8.90%, 19.48%, 9.20%, 8.42%, and 11.29%, respectively; however, soil NH4+-N and NO3⁻-N were significantly lower by 9.08% and 9.30%, respectively. The beneficial yield effects were due mainly to the enhanced synchronization of nutrient availability, soil moisture, and microbial biomass, while the mitigation of N2O emission was mainly attributed to the decreasing soil NO3− and NH4+ concentrations in response to ZOF. Applying both organic fertilizer and zeolite achieved increased maize yield and positive environmental benefits. This strategy could be adopted to improve maize production, mitigate greenhouse effects caused by N2O emissions, and improve soil quality in sandy loam soils.

Keywords: Greenhouse gas emissions, Maize yield, Sandy loam soils, combinedorganic fertilizer and zeolite, soil quality

Received: 18 Apr 2025; Accepted: 21 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Wang, Wang, Yan, Zuo, Sun and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Qinping Sun, Institute of Plant Nutrition and Resources, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing, China
Dongsheng Liu, Institute of Plant Nutrition and Resources, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.