ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Sustain. Food Syst.
Sec. Crop Biology and Sustainability
Volume 9 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1615648
Physical characteristics of several corn varieties and the interaction between planting patterns and varieties on pest attacks Spodoptera frugiperda Smith (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and ant population Oecophylla smaragdina (Fabricius)
Provisionally accepted- National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Bogor, Indonesia
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Superior varieties and planting arrangements significantly impact maize productivity. This research aimed to examine the effects of planting models (farmers' tile model vs. legowo 2:1) and maize varieties on agronomic performance, productivity, and the incidence of damage caused by Spodoptera frugiperda pests and the abundance of predatory weaver ants (Oecophylla smaragdina). The study was conducted using a two-factor split-plot randomized block design: main plots comprised the planting models (tile pattern: 70 cm × 40 cm and legowo 2:1: (50 cm × 35 cm) × 90 cm), and sub-plots involved seven maize varieties (Srikandi Kuning, Pulut Uri, Provit A1, Anoman, Srikandi Ungu, Bisma, and Sukmaraga), arranged in 150 m² plots with three replicates. Results demonstrated significant varietal differences in agronomic traits, including plant height (168.78-219.30 cm), leaf area (6.60-7.85 cm), flowering time (45.33-49.00 days after planting), and ear height (89.42-119.32 cm).Legowo 2:1 planting resulted in higher maize grain yield (7.89 t ha -¹) than the farmers' model (5.38 t ha -¹). Moreover, the legowo 2:1 arrangement significantly reduced leaf damage intensity by S. frugiperda (19.12%) compared to the tile planting pattern (21.26%), as well as corn cob damage (11.58% vs. 13.09%). Varietal differences significantly influenced S. frugiperda population density, ranging from 0.43 to 1.23 larvae per plant, with the lowest incidence in Bisma and the highest in Sukmaraga. The intensity of leaf and cob damage was lowest in Bisma (12.32% leaf, 8.80% cob) and highest in Sukmaraga (25.23% leaf, 15.03% cob).Weaver ant populations negatively correlated with S. frugiperda numbers and associated plant damage. Biplot analysis indicated Bisma as optimal under the legowo 2:1 model and Anoman optimal under the farmers' tile model, while Provit A1 showed suboptimal performance under the legowo arrangement. Therefore, varietal choice and appropriate planting models can effectively enhance maize productivity and reduce pest pressure. These findings provide valuable insights and recommendations for agricultural stakeholders to optimize maize yields through strategic planting configurations and variety selection.
Keywords: Maize varieties, Planting model, S.frugiperda, O. smaragdina, seed yield
Received: 21 Apr 2025; Accepted: 03 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Fattah, Nyoman Widiarta, Yasin, Mulia, Nappu, Sipi, Hannan, Najamuddin, Idaryani, Herniwati, Syafruddin, Paesal, Susilawati, Nugraha, Saenong, Harnowo, Asaad, Wardah, Nurjanani, Dewayani and Syam. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Muhammad Yasin, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Bogor, Indonesia
Surianto Sipi, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Bogor, Indonesia
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.