ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Sustain. Food Syst.
Sec. Waste Management in Agroecosystems
Volume 9 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1616479
Closing the Loop: Crop Yield Response and Soil Health Implications of Human Excreta-Derived Fertilizer Application in Dryland Agriculture
Provisionally accepted
- 1Crop Science, School of Agricultural, Earth & Environmental Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, P. Bag X01, Scottsville, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
- 2WASH R&D, Chemical Engineering Basement, Entrance 3, Rick Turner Road, Howard College, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Glenwood, Durban, South Africa
- 3Chemistry Department, School of Chemistry and Physics, University of KwaZulu-Natal, P. Bag X01, Scottsville, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
This study evaluated the potential of human excreta-derived amendments, specifically, sewage sludge-based co-compost and urine, to improve soil fertility and crop productivity in dryland agriculture without compromising public health. A field experiment was conducted at the Bishopstowe Agricultural Living Lab using a randomized complete block design with five treatments (urine, urine + co-compost, chicken manure, no fertilizer, and conventional fertilizer) and four replications. Chili (Capsicum annuum) yield, soil N mineralization, ammonium and nitrate-N concentrations, urease activity, β-glucosidase activity, alkaline and acid phosphatase activity, microbial community, and active carbon did not differ significantly among treatments (P > 0.05). In contrast, organic C and extractable P were significantly higher in the urine + co-compost and chicken manure treatments. Although the co-compost exhibited high organic C content, associated microbial activity was significantly lower than that observed under chicken manure. Groundwater contamination by Escherichia coli and nitrate was not significantly affected by the application of excreta-derived amendments over the six-month trial. These findings provided insight into the impacts of human excreta-derived fertilizers on crop yields, soil health, and environmental integrity for resilient and sustainable food systems. However, good management practices, including salinity control and adherence to WHO sanitation safety guidelines, should be implemented. The study was constrained by its short duration (six months) and single-site design. Long-term (>2 years) and multilocation experiments are recommended to comprehensively assess the agronomic, soil health, and environmental implications of excreta-derived amendments in dryland agriculture.
Keywords: biostimulants, Circular Bioeconomy, Climate Change, Human Excreta Fertilizers, Regenerative agriculture, Soil Microbiology
Received: 22 Apr 2025; Accepted: 31 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Musazura, Nkomo, Otieno, Badza, Odindo and Ojwach. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: William Musazura, Crop Science, School of Agricultural, Earth & Environmental Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, P. Bag X01, Scottsville, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.