Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sustain. Food Syst.

Sec. Agroecology and Ecosystem Services

Volume 9 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1632921

This article is part of the Research TopicEnhancing Soil Health and Climate Resilience through Sustainable Agricultural PracticesView all 10 articles

Improving soil health and system productivity through conservation agriculture and weed management strategies in rice-maize cropping system

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Department of Agronomy, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Samastipur, India
  • 2Teagasc Oak Park Crops Research Centre, Oak Park, Ireland
  • 3Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, India
  • 4Department of Soil Science, Dr Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Samastipur, India
  • 5Department of Plant Production, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • 6Department of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering (BAE), College of Agriculture and Natural Resources,, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States
  • 7Department of Plant Production, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences,, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Conservation agriculture (CA)-based rice-maize cropping system (RMCS) can be the possible option for higher productivity and maintain soil health in the Indo Gangetic Plains. However, weed infestation remains the major constraint in its adoption. Hence, to adopt CA practices and at the same time manage weed population, a field experiment was carried out at Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University during 2019-20 and 2020-21. Treatments consisted of four main plots of different tillage practices, viz. zero- till direct seeded rice followed by zero-till maize (ZTDSR fb ZTM), direct seeded rice followed by maize on permanent raised beds with residue (PBDSR+R fb PBDSM+R), PBDSR followed by PBDSM without residue (PBDSR-R fb PBDSM-R) and conventional tilled puddled transplanted rice followed by conventional tilled maize (CTR fb CTM). On the other hand, sub-plots comprised of five weed management options, viz. unweeded control, vermicompost mulch, P-enriched vermicompost mulch, live mulch and weed-free. The two-year study revealed that the combination of PBDSR+R fb PBDSM+R emerged as the most effective tillage practice, showing a maximum reduction in bulk density (0.07 Mg m⁻³) and improvements in water holding capacity by 8.1%, soil organic carbon by 8.2%, soil microbial biomass carbon by 32.7%. Among weed management practices, P-enriched vermicompost mulch resulted 18.8% higher dehydrogenase activity of soil with greater nutrient availability as compared to live mulch. In contrast, CTR fb CTM significantly deteriorated soil health. The maximum maize REY (9.3 t ha-1) and system productivity (15.9 t ha-1) were also recorded under PBDSR+R fb PBDSM+R, with increases of up to 15.2% and 25.2% over conventional practices in the second year. Overall, CA practice mainly permanent bed with residue coupled with P-enriched vermicompost mulches demonstrated strong potential for improving soil health and sustainable crop productivity in RMCS.

Keywords: permanent bed, Rice-maize, SMBC, SOC, Soil respiration, System productivity, vermicompost mulch, Zero tillage

Received: 21 May 2025; Accepted: 21 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Sahoo, Roy, Ranjan, Sadhu, Sow, Nath, Alotaibi, Ali and Seleiman. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Dhirendra Kumar Roy, Department of Agronomy, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Samastipur, India
Shivani Ranjan, Department of Agronomy, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Samastipur, India
Sumit Sow, Department of Agronomy, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Samastipur, India

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.