Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

REVIEW article

Front. Sustain. Food Syst.

Sec. Agroecology and Ecosystem Services

Volume 9 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1634747

This article is part of the Research TopicAddressing Microplastic Contamination: Sustainable Solutions for Resilient Food SystemsView all 3 articles

Reining in Plasticulture from Land to Sea: Pacific Northwest (USA) Perspectives on Agriculture and Aquaculture

Provisionally accepted
Susanne  M. BranderSusanne M. Brander1*Gail  A. LangelottoGail A. Langelotto1Minal  T. MistryMinal T. Mistry2Sebastian  Leonard SingletonSebastian Leonard Singleton1MacKenna  A. HaineyMacKenna A. Hainey1Lauren  KashiwabaraLauren Kashiwabara1Kelsey  ArthurKelsey Arthur1Elise  GranekElise Granek3Kervelle  BairdKervelle Baird3Ricardo  PalazuelosRicardo Palazuelos4Nayeli  CamposNayeli Campos5Heather  TrimHeather Trim5Libby  SommerLibby Sommer6Stacey  HarperStacey Harper1Gifty  Rhodalyn TettehGifty Rhodalyn Tetteh7
  • 1Oregon State University, Corvallis, United States
  • 2Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, Portland, United States
  • 3Portland State University, Portland, United States
  • 4Health & Human Services, Washington County, Beaverton, United States
  • 5Zero Waste Washington, Seattle, United States
  • 6Libby Sommer LLC, Sacramento, United States
  • 7University of Oregon, Eugene, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Plastic use in food production—known as plasticulture—has transformed agriculture and aquaculture globally. Plasticulture gained momentum in the mid-20th century with the development of novel plastic materials, and by 2009, U.S. farmers used over 200 million pounds of plastic films annually. Though plastics have increased yields and efficiency, they now pose environmental hazards through the release of microplastics (MPs) and chemicals. Despite extensive documentation of MPs in the environment, their role in U.S. food production and impacts on crop, livestock, and aquaculture health remain underexplored. In regions like the Pacific Northwest (PNW), with robust agricultural and aquaculture sectors, plastics from films, mulches, cages, and ropes are significant sources of MPs. Soil amendments like biosolids and compost also contribute MPs from household waste. Agricultural plastics accounted for 3–5% (10–18 million tons) of global plastic production in 2018 and are projected to increase due to growing food demand. Aquaculture uses an estimated 2.1 million tons of plastics annually, but detailed data on MP generation is lacking. Despite known environmental concerns, a sustainable circular model for plastics in food systems is still absent, but necessary. While biodegradable products for use in farming and aquaculture have been introduced, high costs, regulations, and practical limitations hinder widespread adoption. Until recently, the American Society for Plasticulture primarily focused on new plastic innovations rather than sustainability. Now, growing awareness of pollution and health risks has led to increased scrutiny. In the PNW—home to key specialty crops and 6% of U.S. aquaculture operations—there is an urgent need for coordinated efforts to reduce plastic contamination. Shifting toward sustainable practices is challenging but critical to protect ecosystems, food safety, and public health, and possible through regional and state-level regulations on composting, wastewater and biosolids mitigation, and movement to more sustainable replacements where feasible. As our knowledge of MNP impacts on the food supply at sea and on land increases, approaches to reduce the use of plastics overall and to limit leaching and fragmentation into crops, seafood, and meat is essential to protecting human and environmental health. Regulatory efforts at the regional, national and global levels are needed to enhance food safety.

Keywords: Agriculture, Aquaculture, Microplastics, nanoplastics, chemicals

Received: 25 May 2025; Accepted: 28 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Brander, Langelotto, Mistry, Singleton, Hainey, Kashiwabara, Arthur, Granek, Baird, Palazuelos, Campos, Trim, Sommer, Harper and Tetteh. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Susanne M. Brander, Oregon State University, Corvallis, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.