Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

REVIEW article

Front. Sustain. Food Syst.

Sec. Climate-Smart Food Systems

Volume 9 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1639908

This article is part of the Research TopicBuilding Resilience Through Sustainability: Innovative Strategies In Agricultural SystemsView all 11 articles

Improving Sustainability of Inland Pacific Northwest Dryland Agriculture Systems with Pea-Canola Intercropping: A Review

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Washington State University, Pullman, United States
  • 2Oregon State University, Corvallis, United States
  • 3USDA Agricultural Research Service, Washington, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Changing weather conditions are having negative impacts on dryland (rainfed) crop production systems such as those found in the inland Pacific Northwest (iPNW). This region is dominated by winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production and also produces alternative crops such as canola (Brassica napus L.) and peas (Pisum sativum L.). Producers need crop rotations and agronomic management strategies that are equally productive and more sustainable than traditional winter wheat-fallow systems. New crop rotations should prioritize crop water use efficiency (WUE), protect soil health, and manage herbicide-resistant weeds. Intercropping is one practice that can promote agroecosystem biodiversity, soil health, drought resilience, and resource use efficiency (RUE), among other ecosystem services. Spring pea and spring canola intercropping, also referred to as "peaola", is emerging as an alternative crop rotation and management for the dryland iPNW mainly because it increases RUE and WUE, while reducing production inputs. However, little is known about producing peaola in the iPNW. Therefore, this review seeks to address a wide range of topics, including (but not limited to) ecological and agronomic aspects of intercropped systems, the impact of peaola production on soil health, the potential of peaola to reduce pest pressure and improve drought resilience, and examples of barriers that may prevent the adoption of peaola in the iPNW. Findings indicate that peaola can provide agroecosystem benefits such as improved water infiltration, soil organic matter turnover, nutrient cycling, and increased land use efficiency. However, complexity of management, a lack of region-specific research, and marketing constraints are legitimate challenges barring the immediate adoption of peaola. Nonetheless, peaola has the potential to improve cereal crop production and promote sustainability in dryland agricultural systems across the iPNW.

Keywords: intercropping, peaola, sustainability, PEA, canola

Received: 03 Jun 2025; Accepted: 31 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Stubbs, Singh, Wysocki, Heineck, Neely and Singh. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Shikha Singh, Washington State University, Pullman, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.