PERSPECTIVE article
Front. Sustain. Food Syst.
Sec. Climate-Smart Food Systems
Volume 9 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1640274
Increasing Adoption of Grain Postharvest Technology by Smallholder Farmers: A Five-Pronged Strategy
Provisionally accepted- 1FoodPlus Research Group, Faculty of Life Sciences Natural Resources, Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Lilongwe, Malawi
- 2Department of Plant Pathology, Throckmorton Plant Sciences Center, Kansas State University, Manhattan, United States
- 3Centre for Resilient Agri-Food Systems (CRAFS), University of Malawi, Zomba, Malawi
- 4Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture Environment and Food Systems (FAEFS), University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
- 5Department of Agricultural Business Development and Economics, Faculty of Agriculture Environment and Food Systems (FAEFS), University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
- 6Department of Food Science and Technology, Bunda College, Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Nat-ural Resources, Lilongwe, Malawi
- 7Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Bunda College, Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Lilongwe, Malawi
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Grain postharvest losses (PHLs) reduce food security, income stability, and climate resilience among smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. Proven technologies, e.g., hermetic storage bags and metal silos, are available, but significant non-technical barriers to adoption remain. These complex barriers include limited awareness and training, limited local availability, initial high costs, low harvest volumes, underestimation of losses, socio-cultural constraints, and weak institutional and policy support. We propose a five-pronged strategy to increase adoption. In particular: (1) Strengthening farmer knowledge and training systems; (2) Localizing the development and distribution of postharvest technologies; (3) Expanding access to affordable and flexible financing; (4) Reinforcing policy and institutional frameworks; and(5) Embedding postharvest practices within climate-smart, market-driven value chains.Implementation of this strategy positions postharvest management as a structural driver of rural transformation by linking grain loss reduction to increased productivity, enhanced market participation, and livelihood resilience.
Keywords: Farmer training, grain storage, Hermetic technologies, Institutional barriers, Postharvest extension, Postharvest investment, Technology dissemination
Received: 03 Jun 2025; Accepted: 11 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Nakoma-Ngoma, Leslie, Monjerezi, Mvumi, Chamboko, Kamundi, Thadzi, Kachala, Gama, Maonga, Harvey and Matumba. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Limbikani Matumba, FoodPlus Research Group, Faculty of Life Sciences Natural Resources, Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Lilongwe, Malawi
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.