Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sustain. Food Syst.

Sec. Land, Livelihoods and Food Security

Volume 9 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1647732

This article is part of the Research TopicIndigenous and Local Knowledge as a Catalyst for Sustainable Agriculture and Food SecurityView all 21 articles

Fostering Kalanamak rice farmer's resilience and profitability in India by integrating local knowledge into the seed system and markets

Provisionally accepted
  • IRRI South Asia Regional Centre, Varanasi, India

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Kalanamak, an aromatic rice landrace (Oryza sativa L.) traditionally cultivated by indigenous farmers in the Terai belt of Uttar Pradesh, India, has seen a resurgence following the development of improved accessions with higher productivity and market potential. Like other aromatic landraces in India, Kalanamak holds deep socio-economic value, prized for its agroecological resilience, cultural identity, culinary heritage, and role in rural livelihoods. The current study focused on three key aspects: (1) comparing the performance of traditional and improved Kalanamak cultivars within the GI (Geographically Indicated) area, (2) mapping the seed and milled rice value chain, and (3) building farmer capacity for quality seed production of improved Kalanamak varieties. Eleven traditional accessions and three improved semi dwarf varieties of Kalanamak were evaluated through replicated multi-year trial in the GI area. Semi-dwarf cultivars such as Bauna Kalanamak 101, Bauna Kalanamak 102 and Kalanamak Kiran showed higher mean yield compared to the traditional accessions, however the differences in yield were statistically nonsignificant. A comprehensive value chain assessment of the Kalanamak seed and rice market was conducted through participatory rural appraisal and in-depth interviews with 50 value chain actors, including smallholder farmers, seed growers, millers, and community-based organizations (CBOs). Findings revealed a hybrid seed network where decentralized farmer-to-farmer exchange coexists with collective-led procurement and emerging private sector channels. To strengthen this evolving system, targeted capacity building in 15 villages in terms of quality seed production was ensured-enhancing farmer skills in varietal selection, purity maintenance, and post-harvest handling, leading to the production of 6,800 kg of quality seeds and improved access to high-performing Kalanamak varieties. Profitability assessment compared traditional and improved cultivars under organic and inorganic practices. Semi-dwarf Kalanamak variants under organic cultivation showed the highest profitability (B:C ratio 3.92), outperforming traditional varieties and inorganic systems. Sensitivity analysis further revealed that semi-dwarf systems remained the most resilient under adverse cost– benefit shifts, consistently maintaining BCRs above 2.0. The results affirm that integrating farmer-led seed systems with scientifically validated accessions and localized training can enhance profitability, strengthen seed sovereignty, and revitalize the Kalanamak rice economy in the GI areas.

Keywords: Cost-Benefit Analysis, Farmer-led Seed System, GI region, Kalanamak rice, Landraces, local seed system, Participatory rural appraisal, Terai Farmers

Received: 16 Jun 2025; Accepted: 30 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Nath, Shukla and NAYAK. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Anirban Nath, a.nath@cgiar.org

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.