ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Sustain. Food Syst.
Sec. Climate-Smart Food Systems
Volume 9 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1659553
This article is part of the Research TopicBuilding Resilience Through Sustainability: Innovative Strategies In Agricultural SystemsView all 10 articles
Agricultural Production Services and Their Influence on Rural Common Prosperity : Evidence from Eastern China
Provisionally accepted- 1School of Economics and Management, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing, China
- 2Institute for Rural Revitalization Strategy, Southwest University, Chongqing, China
- 3College of Public Administration, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
- 4Nanjing Agricultural University China Resources & Environment and Development Academy, Nanjing, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Common prosperity has emerged as a central focus in the global sustainable development agenda.Raising the total income of farmers and narrowing the income equality in rural areas are important ways to achieve common prosperity. This study utilized 368 micro-survey data of rural households in Jiangsu Province, China in 2016, to examine how agricultural production services (APS) promote common prosperity in eastern China through two mechanisms: narrowing the urban-rural income gap and reducing income inequality in rural areas. The results indicate that APS significantly increases per capita total income of rural households, thereby contributing to the narrowing of the urban-rural income gap by raising rural incomes. Moreover, APS has significantly reduced income inequality within rural areas. Notably, the positive effects of APS on agricultural net income are more pronounced for large-scale farmers, while for small-scale farmers, the services contribute substantially to increases in wage and business income. These findings suggest that it could generate larger common prosperity effect by tailoring the APS framework to overcome the distinctive constraints of small-scale farmers in order to compress intra-rural income inequality and rural-urban income inequality.
Keywords: agricultural production services, Income inequality, Rural poverty, Rural Common Prosperity, sustainable agriculture
Received: 04 Jul 2025; Accepted: 28 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Yang, Guan and Zhu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Changkun Guan, Institute for Rural Revitalization Strategy, Southwest University, Chongqing, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.