Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sustain. Food Syst.

Sec. Climate-Smart Food Systems

Volume 9 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1661999

This article is part of the Research TopicRegenerative Agriculture for Soil Health, Greenhouse Gas Mitigation, and Climate ActionView all 16 articles

GHG Emissions and Carbon Footprint in Wheat Cultivation Practices in Bihar state of India

Provisionally accepted
Ram  PalRam Pal1Sanjay  Kumar PatelSanjay Kumar Patel1*Prem  Kumar SundaramPrem Kumar Sundaram2*Ratnesh Kumar  JhaRatnesh Kumar Jha1Pawan  JeetPawan Jeet1Dr. Abdus  SattarDr. Abdus Sattar1Sanjay  KumarSanjay Kumar1
  • 1Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Samastipur, India
  • 2ICAR - Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna, India

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Wheat, the second most cultivated crop globally after rice, is a major source of food and nutrition but also contributes significantly to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In the context of climate change, it is important to evaluate cultivation practices not only for their productivity but also for their environmental sustainability. This study assessed conventional tillage and no-tillage wheat production systems in Bihar, India, focusing on CO₂-equivalent emissions, energy use, carbon offset potential, and the carbon sustainability index (CSI). Total GHG emissions from agricultural inputs ranged from 1745.66 to 2239.27 kg CO₂-eq ha⁻¹, with indirect energy sources being the largest contributors in several no-tillage variants. Among the systems studied, NT-6 recorded the highest carbon offset (2597.12 kg CO₂-eq ha⁻¹), while NT-3 achieved the lowest net carbon emission (16.76 kg CO₂-eq ha⁻¹). Conventional practices such as CP-12 were more emission-intensive and heavily dependent on non-renewable energy, whereas no-tillage systems consistently showed lower emissions, higher carbon efficiency, and improved sustainability. The maximum CSI value (0.079) was obtained under NT-4, while CP-1 had the lowest (-0.363). These results demonstrate that no-tillage is not only a low-emission option but also a more energy-efficient and sustainable production system that aligns with climate-smart agriculture. The findings provide evidence-based guidance for policymakers, planners, and farmers to adopt conservation practices that enhance wheat productivity while reducing the environmental footprint, thereby supporting climate change mitigation and long-term agricultural sustainability.

Keywords: Carbon Footprint, Life Cycle Assessment, Greenhouse gas emissions, carbon emission, Environmental impact, Zero tillage

Received: 21 Jul 2025; Accepted: 15 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Pal, Patel, Sundaram, Jha, Jeet, Sattar and Kumar. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Sanjay Kumar Patel, sppiari@gmail.com
Prem Kumar Sundaram, premksundaram@gmail.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.