ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Sustain. Food Syst.
Sec. Agroecology and Ecosystem Services
Volume 9 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1662844
This article is part of the Research TopicInnovative Approaches in Agroecology and Ecosystem Services for Transformative Sustainable Food SystemsView all articles
Assessing China's Food Security Functional Zoning for the Water-Energy-Food-Ecology System
Provisionally accepted- 1School of management, Shenyang Normal University, Shenyang, China
- 2Agricultural Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The food system faces severe global climate change and resource constraints, requiring consideration of its resource consumption and ecosystem impact. How to achieve food security under the water-energy-food-ecology (WEFE) system framework is a common challenge for all countries worldwide. Therefore, food security research from the perspective of WEFE holds great practical value and significance. It aligns with the vision of meeting people's ecological resource needs and supports the UN Sustainable Development Goals. This study constructed a measurement system consisting of 4 subsystems and 17 indicators and used 2014–2021 panel data from 31 provincial-level regions to assess food security capability from the perspective of WEFE. The findings are as follows: (1) The food security guarantee capacity of 31 provincial-level regions improved from 2014 to 2021. (2) From 2014 to 2021, a small number of indicators contributed more significantly to food security capacity: agricultural fertilizer application, diesel use and pesticide use had an average annual contribution of 46.71% (potentially unsustainable with environmental risks). Additionally, some indicators saw a marked rise in contribution–over 8 years, water-saving irrigation area, cumulative soil erosion control area and green coverage area increased by 27.17%, 22.29% and 25.93%, highlighting the key role of ecological environment and resource elements in the food system. (3) From 2014 to 2021, the obstacle degree of the indicators to food security capacity remained relatively stable: pesticide use dropped significantly by 22.17%, while other indicators changed by less than 10%. (4) Based on the food security capacity assessment results, this study designed a functional zoning (seven types). The determination of functional zoning was based on the assessment results of the water, energy, food, and land subsystems within the food security capacity assessment results. Furthermore, it proposed targeted response strategies and policy recommendations to enhance the region's food security, based on the characteristics of different functional areas. This study provided more reasonable functional zoning methods and more realistic results, which can promote balanced WEFE development, stabilize regional food supply, optimize water and energy use in production, protect ecology, strengthen global food security, and offer a Chinese solution for a new international food security paradigm.
Keywords: factors analysis, Food security, Functional zoning, guarantee capacity, water-energy-food-ecology
Received: 09 Jul 2025; Accepted: 05 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Wei, Zhang, Lou and Guan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Xin Guan, School of management, Shenyang Normal University, Shenyang, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.