Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sustain. Food Syst.

Sec. Agricultural and Food Economics

Volume 9 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1667492

Replacing Tobacco with Alternatives Crops for Sustainable Development: Understanding Smallholder Farmers' Perspectives in Uganda

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Makerere University Department of Agribusiness and Natural Resource Economics, Kampala, Uganda
  • 2World Bank Survey Unit, Development Data Group, Kampala, Uganda
  • 3Africa Waste and Environment Management Centre, Nairobi, Kenya

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Almost 5.3 million hectares of land across the globe are dedicated to tobacco, with more than 75% allocated to growing activities. However, tobacco farming is often linked with social, economic and environmental problems. Tobacco farmers are largely attracted by the ease of access to input credit and guaranteed produce markets, however, also largely challenged by tobacco's labour-intensive nature that accelerates occupational health hazards, and prolonged liquidity constraints with risk of entrapment in debt. The mixed method approach, in this study, uses the exploratory sequential approach to examine farmers' willingness to shift from tobacco farming to alternative crops. Data were collected through face-to-face and in-depth interviews in tobacco growing areas of Hoima district. Descriptive analysis and t-test was conducted to characterize tobacco farmers, the binary probit model used to examine factors influencing tobacco farmers' willingness to shift and the multinomial logistic regression used to identify crop attributes farmers prioritize while selecting potential alternatives. The majority of tobacco farmers (73%) were willing to shift to alternative crops. Farmers willing to shift to alternative crops were on average younger and had fewer household members. Having land ownership rights (p<0.01) and being female (p<0.05) had a statistically significant positive effect whereas distance to tobacco markets and access to input credit were negatively associated with farmers' willingness to shift to alternative crops (p<0.01). Farmers' preference for potentially alternative crops such as maize, rice, beans and cassava were influenced by different crop specific attributes. The study therefore suggests that strengthening land ownership rights, and increasing access to input credit and well-structured markets for non-tobacco (alternative) crops are likely to facilitate smallholder farmer transition from tobacco. Additionally, policy interventions should facilitate access to crop options with specific attributes suitable in previously tobacco grown areas as well as inclusive and appropriate technologies that reduce labour burdens, targeting the youths and women as catalysts for farmer transition to alternative crops. Lastly, the collaborative multi-sectoral approach presents strategic opportunities to address tobacco's negative economic, environmental, and health impacts leveraging coordinated efforts to achieve sustainable development and meet the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO-FCTC) goals.

Keywords: alternative crops, Smallholder farmers, sustainable development, Tobacco, Willingness to shift

Received: 07 Aug 2025; Accepted: 21 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Nakamatte, Ilukor and Kibwage. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Irene Nakamatte, irenenakamatte2@gmail.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.