ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Sustain. Food Syst.
Sec. Agroecology and Ecosystem Services
Effect of Integrated Organic Nutrient Management on Growth, Yield, and Soil fertility under a Maize–Berseem–Cowpea Cropping System
Provisionally accepted- 1University of Agricultural Sciences Dharwad, Dharwad, India
- 2National Dairy Research Institute (ICAR), Karnal, India
- 3College of Agriculture, Vishweshwaraiah Canal Farm, Mandya, India
- 4ICAR - Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow, India
- 5ICAR - Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India
- 6Central Silk Board, Bengaluru, India
- 7Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture & Technology, Ayodhya, India
- 8Tocklai Tea Research Institute, Jorhat, India
- 9ICAR-CAZRI Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kukuma, Bhuj (Kutch), India
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Intensive cropping systems in South Asia, particularly those focused on year-round fodder supply, are increasingly constrained by soil fertility decline, nutrient imbalance, and reduced biological activity due to the overreliance on inorganic fertilizers. To address this challenge, the present study evaluated the effects of integrated organic nutrient management (IONM) involving farmyard manure (FYM), plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), and panchagavya on crop performance and soil health under a maize (Zea mays L.) (M)–berseem (Trifolium alexandrinum L.) (B)–cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) (C) sequential fodder system. A field experiment was conducted over three consecutive years (2018–2021) with seven nutrient management treatments, including fully organic, partially organic, and inorganic fertilizer-based regimes. Research findings revealed that the T7 treatment, involving 100% Recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) through FYM + PGPR + 3% foliar spray of panchagavya (M) – PGPR + 3% foliar spray of panchagavya (B) – PGPR + 3% foliar spray of panchagavya (C), yielded significant improvements in both green fodder of maize (35.4, 37.0, and 38.6 t ha-1), berseem (58.2, 60.0, and 60.6 t ha-1) and cowpea (25.7, 27.5, and 28.3 t ha-1) during 2018-19, 2019-20 and 2020-21, respectively. Results revealed that T7 significantly enhanced plant growth attributes from 20.7-34.4%. in all three crops. Nutrient concentrations (N, P, K, Zn, Fe) and uptake were consistently higher under T7 across all crops. Additionally, T7 recorded the improvement in soil nutrient availability after each crop cycle, reflecting cumulative benefits over time. The findings indicate that the integrated application of FYM, PGPR, and panchagavya can serve as a sustainable alternative to inorganic fertilizers by improving both crop productivity and soil fertility. The study supports the adoption of IONM strategies for enhancing the resilience and sustainability of intensive fodder production systems, offering a viable pathway for reducing chemical input dependency while maintaining high yields.
Keywords: Farmyard manure, Fodder yield, Panchagavya, PGPR, Nutritive quality
Received: 02 Aug 2025; Accepted: 24 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Onte, Fiskey, Dadhich, Kumar, Rajkumari, Bhanusri, T V, Yadav, Singh, P, Singh, Kumar, Boregowda, Kumar, Garg, Gowda, Singh, PYATI, Kanwat, Chandra, Mukherjee and Kumar. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Sanjeev Kumar, bhanusanjeev@gmail.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
