ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Sustain. Food Syst.
Sec. Water-Smart Food Production
This article is part of the Research TopicAdvanced technologies for water management: targeting sustainable agricultureView all articles
Application of the AquaCrop Model for Cotton Production under Water Scarce Arid Conditions
Provisionally accepted- 1Tashkent Institute of Irrigation and Agricultural Mechanization Engineers National Research University, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
- 2Korkyt Ata Kyzylorda University, Kyzylorda, Kazakhstan
- 3Samarkand Agroinnovations and Research University, Samarkand, Uzbekistan
- 4Fergana Polytechnic Institute, Fergana, Uzbekistan
- 5Institute of Agriculture and Agrotechnologies of Karakalpakstan, Nukus, Uzbekistan
- 6Andijon qishloq xo'jalik instituti, Andijan, Uzbekistan
- 7Scientific Research Institute of Breeding Seed Production and Agricultural Technology of Cotton Cultivation, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
- 8Tashkent State Agrarian University, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Cotton is an important fiber crop, yet traditional cultivation practices are heavily water intensive. As limited water resources increasingly constrain cotton productivity, it is important to investigate alternative irrigation strategies that can maintain stable yields under severe water scarcity conditions. Tools like the AquaCrop model play a key role in this process, allowing to simulate intricate relationships among management techniques, water use, crop development, and yield production. In this study, the model underwent calibration and validation based on three irrigation regimes (1-2-1; 1-3-1; 1-4-1) in three field capacity (FC) datasets (FC 65-65-60%, FC 70-70-65%, and FC 75-75-70%) and its effectiveness was assessed through simulations of canopy cover (CC), biomass accumulation and water productivity (WP). The results showed that the highest cotton yield was obtained under FC 70-70-65% irrigation regime (3.553 Mg ha-1 for 2022; 3.325 Mg ha-1 for 2023; 3.441 Mg ha-1 for 2024), while the simulated and measured cotton yields were consistent with a deviation < 5%. WP values were also higher with the FC 70-70-65% irrigation regime, exhibiting 0.66 kg m3 in 2024; 0.64 kg m3 in 2023 and 0.64 kg m3 in 2022. The deviations were in the range of < 2.77% to 4.89% for cotton yield, < 1.6% to 4.89% for WP, < 3.48% to 5.01% for biomass, < 1.17% to 5.17% for HI. Soil moisture content between measured and simulated values were observed with a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.814, 0.799 and 0.604 for Fc 65–65– 60%, Fc 70–70–65% and Fc 75–75–70%, respectively. Under the optimal mode (70–70–65% of Fc) of irrigation schedule, WP increased by 13.15 to 24.13% compared other irrigation regimes. It was concluded that the digitalization of agricultural irrigation using the AquaCrop model will advance water-saving priorities, contribute to climate resilience and promote more sustainable crop production practices under the challenging water scarcity conditions of arid ecosystems.
Keywords: AquaCrop model, Arid environment, cotton yield, Soil moisture content, irrigationtechniques, Field capacity
Received: 27 Sep 2025; Accepted: 27 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Sindarov, Isaev, Khayitov, Bulanbayeva, Rizaev, Sanayev, Zakirova, Khojasov, Abdulkhaqov, Isashov, Nematov, Khalikov, Tadjibekova and Khaitov. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Botir  Khaitov, bhaitov@yahoo.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
