Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

REVIEW article

Front. Sustain. Food Syst.

Sec. Sustainable Food Processing

Volume 9 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1714576

This article is part of the Research TopicNon-Timber Forest Products: From Sustainable Harvest To Market InnovationView all articles

Non-Timber Forest Products and the Bioeconomy: Linking Livelihood Security and Biodiversity Conservation (2015–2025 Trends)Non-Timber Forest Products and the Need for Conservation

Provisionally accepted
Tejaswi  BoyapatiTejaswi Boyapati1,2*Kasiviswanathan  MuthukumarappanKasiviswanathan Muthukumarappan1,2
  • 1South Dakota State University, Brookings, United States
  • 2South Dakota State University College of Agriculture Food and Environmental Sciences, Brookings, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Non‐timber forest products (NTFPs), wild foods, fibres, medicines, resins, and animal products are critical to the economies and cultures of rural people in South Asia, sub‐Saharan Africa, and Latin America. Data compiled and Meta-analysis from literature and published between 2015 and 2025 indicate that these products are frequently utilized at the household level (approximately 77% usage frequency) and significantly enhance incomes, particularly for land-constrained households and Indigenous populations.Data from 2015–2025 reveal that many use these products commonly at the household level (with ~77% frequency of use) and contribute significantly to incomes (especially for land-poor households and Indigenous peoples). In contrast, booms in markets for açaí, shea, and medicinal plants indicate new opportunities but also variable patterns.variegated levels of volatility. NTFPs also possess powerful ritual value (e.g., frankincense, kava, babassu) and can incentivize forest stewardship. However, their commercialization without appropriate safeguards may result in the over-extraction of species and ecological degradation. Climate change amplifies pressures. Improvements in post-harvest handling, drying, modified atmospheric packagingMAP, cold chains, and better packaging enhance quality, extend shelf life, and reduce waste, thereby increasing returns and mitigating extraction pressure. Sustainability is underpinned by appropriate policies to secure tenure, recognise community rights, regulate trade, and promote cooperative value addition. Targets revolved around rights-based governance, flexible and responsive monitoring, diversified markets, scalable and efficient processing techniques, and certification schemes, as well as integration of cultural values and biodiversity goals.biocultural integration interfaces and climate adaptation. By reframing NTFPs as central to bio economies, we connect livelihood security to biodiversity conservation at multiple scales and across regions.

Keywords: non-timber forest products, Sustainable harvest, Value Chains, Post-harvest handling, bioeconomy, Indigenous rights, climate adaptation, conservation

Received: 27 Sep 2025; Accepted: 20 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Boyapati and Muthukumarappan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Tejaswi Boyapati, tejaswi.boyapati@jacks.sdstate.edu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.