Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Tuberc., 13 January 2026

Sec. Therapeutic Advances in Tuberculosis and Non-Tuberculous Mycobacterial Disease

Volume 3 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/ftubr.2025.1718997

This article is part of the Research TopicTuberculosis in Focus: Antibiotic Resistance and New Antimicrobial DrugsView all articles

Evaluation of a short, all oral treatment regimen including bedaquiline, delamanid, linezolid, clofazimine, and pyrazinamide named “Regimen C” for pre-XDR tuberculosis in Niger


Soumana Boubacar SoumanaSoumana Boubacar Soumana1Abdourahamane Yacouba,
Abdourahamane Yacouba1,2*Cheikh Aboubacar Abdoul LawiCheikh Aboubacar Abdoul Lawi3Ibrahim OumarIbrahim Oumar3Bassirou SouleymaneBassirou Souleymane4Alphazazi SoumanaAlphazazi Soumana3Tapha OunoussaTapha Ounoussa2Mahamadou DoutchiMahamadou Doutchi5Mamane DaouMamane Daou1Souleymane Brah,Souleymane Brah1,2Eric AdehossiEric Adehossi1Saidou Mamadou,Saidou Mamadou1,2
  • 1Université Abdou Moumouni, Faculté des Sciences de la Santé, Niamey, Niger
  • 2National Reference Laboratory for Tuberculosis, Amirou Boubacar Diallo National Hospital, Niamey, Niger
  • 3Ministry of Public Health and Hygiene, National Program Against Tuberculosis, Niamey, Niger
  • 4Action Damien, Niamey, Niger
  • 5Université André Salifou, Faculté des Sciences de la Santé, Zinder, Niger

Background: The emergence of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB) poses a serious challenge to global tuberculosis control, particularly in high-burden countries like Niger. In 2021, a new fully oral, shorter treatment regimen, named regimen C, was adopted nationally.

Aim: This study aimed to assess its effectiveness under programmatic conditions.

Methods: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study conducted from April 2021 to December 2024. All patients with pre-XDR and XDR-TB treated in one of the four multidrug-resistant (MDR) TB units in Niger, who received the new standardized regimen and completed their treatment, were included in the study.

Results: A total of 16 patients with pre-XDR-TB were included in the study. Clinical, microbiological, and radiological data were collected. The median age was 30.5 [interquartile range (IQR) 25–39 years], and 62.5% of patients were male. All patients had pulmonary pre-XDR TB. At the end of treatment, a therapeutic success rate of 75.0% was observed. Adverse events occurred in 88.0% of patients, including 2 cases (14.3%) of grade 4 adverse reactions. Undernourished patients tended to have an increased risk of unfavorable treatment outcomes, although this association was not statistically significant (p = 0.18).

Conclusion: These findings suggest that the regimen evaluated in this study appears to be effective for the management of pre-XDR tuberculosis in Niger, with a promising treatment success rate.

Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB) is an infectious disease that has existed for centuries, caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. It remains a major public health challenge globally and particularly in the West African sub-region, where living conditions increase the population's vulnerability (1). TB ranks among the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide, affecting primarily populations in developing countries (1). It is often linked to precarious socio-economic conditions and underdeveloped health systems, making it a pressing public health concern—especially with the emergence of drug-resistant forms that hinder efforts to control the disease and make its treatment increasingly difficult (2).

Since the introduction of the first antibiotics, such as streptomycin in the 1960s, cases of resistance have been reported (3). Over the decades, the emergence of strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex resistant to rifampicin, isoniazid (the two most powerful first-line anti-TB drugs, thus defining multidrug-resistant TB), and second-line drugs has become a growing concern in many regions of the world (4). Among these resistant forms, some are particularly difficult to treat, including pre-extensively drug-resistant (pre-XDR) tuberculosis. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), pre-XDR is defined as tuberculosis caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains that are resistant to rifampicin, isoniazid, and fluoroquinolones. In contrast, XDR-TB is characterized by tuberculosis caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains resistant to rifampicin, isoniazid, and additionally being resistant to any fluoroquinolone, as well as at least bedaquiline and or linezolide, all from Group A anti-TB drugs. Currently, the WHO classifies second-line anti-TB drugs into three groups: A, B, and C. Group A drugs are the most effective among second-line medications for treating drug-resistant tuberculosis and include levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, bedaquiline, and linezolid (5). XDR TB patients require individualized treatment regimens that utilize the most effective available drugs from Groups A to C, as determined by drug susceptibility test (DST) results and patient history. Older therapeutic protocols for pre-XDR TB involved over 18 months of treatment (6). These prolonged treatments required intensive monitoring due to their toxicity, in addition to being costly and often inaccessible in many countries (7, 8). All these factors made the implementation of such regimens particularly difficult. However, the availability of new and repurposed drugs [such as pretomanid (Pa), bedaquiline (B), and linezolid (L)] for managing drug-resistant TB, along with evidence from trials such as PRACTECAL (9), led the WHO to endorse a new, shorter, all-oral, standardized regimen (BPaL) for treating pre-XDR TB in patients who had not previously been exposed to these drugs (10). Over the past decade, Niger's drug-resistant TB program has adopted a cascade of regimen strategies, starting with the standard short treatment regimen (STR) based on second-line injectable drugs (SLIDs) and fluoroquinolones (FQs), with FQs serving as the core drug (11). Bedaquiline (Bdq), introduced in 2012, has been secured as the core drug for third-line regimens for patients who did not respond to or relapsed. This approach has achieved a definitive relapse-free cure rate of 84.7% (12). In 2016, the regimen became an adaptive short treatment regimen (aSTR), with a second-line injectable drug (SLID) and linezolid (Lzd).

The introduction of new and repurposed drugs for managing resistant TB prompted Niger drug-resistant committee in 2021 to develop a third-line regimen for treating pre-XDR and XDR-TB (13). This fully oral, short-course regimen, lasting 9 to 11 months, is referred to as “Regimen C.” Niger adopted this regimen in April 2021 for the management of pre-XDR and XDR-TB. Regimen C consists of a 4–6 months intensive phase (linezolid, high-dose isoniazid, bedaquiline, delamanid, clofazimine, and pyrazinamide), followed by a 5-month continuation phase (bedaquiline, delamanid, clofazimine, and pyrazinamide). The rationale of regimen C is that the bactericidal action of Lzd and high-dose isoniazid protects Bdq, while delamanid (Dlm) is included to protect the action of the other drugs. Clofazimine (Cfz) is used for its sterilizing properties, as is pyrazinamide, which also has synergistic activity with Bdq (14).

Four years after the implementation of this new regimen, it is timely to assess its effectiveness to help guide future public health interventions in the fight against drug-resistant TB in Niger—hence the importance of this study. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of regimen C over 4 years. The goal is to provide real-world data on the performance of the protocol, thereby guiding clinical practice and public health policies in the fight against drug-resistant tuberculosis.

Methodology

Study setting

This study was conducted in the four MDR-TB units in Niger, located in Niamey, Maradi, Tahoua, and Zinder. The laboratory data were supplemented from the National Reference laboratory (NRL) for tuberculosis at the Amirou Boubacar Diallo National Hospital in Niamey, Niger.

Study design and period

This was a cross-sectional study based on retrospective data collection over 4 years, from April 2021 to December 2024.

Study population and sampling

The study's target population included all cases of drug-resistant tuberculosis in Niger. Data were collected using an exhaustive sampling approach across all MDR-TB treatment units. All patients diagnosed with pre-XDR or XDR tuberculosis received care in one of the country's four designated MDR-TB units.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

All patients with pre-XDR and XDR tuberculosis treated in one of the four MDR-TB units in Niger, who received regimen C and completed their treatment, were included in the study. Patients with pre-XDR or XDR-TB who were treated under the old regimen, as well as any patients with unusable records, were excluded.

Data collection and analysis

Based on the criteria detailed above, data were collected using forms and review of medical records, along with information gathered from the electronic registries of patients from the four MDR-TB units. Collected data included sociodemographic data (age, sex, origin, occupation, marital status), medical history, comorbidities, and risk behaviors (smoking, alcoholism, etc.); clinical and radiographic data (body mass index, localization of tuberculosis, lung cavity), bacteriological data (sputum smear, sputum culture, Xpert MTB/RIF, MTB/XDR tests, test Hain) and therapeutic data (therapeutic status of patients, prior treatment with second line drugs, duration of treatment, side effects, and suspected causative drugs). Data were exported into the software programs Sphinx Plus version 5 and Epi Info 3.5 for analysis. A descriptive analysis was conducted, calculating frequencies and percentages for qualitative variables, as well as medians and interquartile ranges for quantitative variables. Percentages were compared using the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Ethical considerations

This study was approved by the Faculty of Health Sciences of Abdou Moumouni University under the number 000033-2024/FSS/UAM/DOY/SP. Furthermore, approval for the study was obtained from the ethics committee of Niger (N°24/2021/CNERS). All collected information was anonymized and used solely for research purposes. Patient confidentiality was respected.

Results

Patient inclusion in the study

A total of 446 cases of drug-resistant tuberculosis were identified from the four MDR-TB units in Niger. Of these, 18 cases of pre-XDR TB were identified. Two of the 18 cases of pre-XDR TB did not meet the inclusion criteria. Finally, 16 cases of pre-XDR TB under regimen C who completed the full treatment were included in the final analysis (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Flowchart displaying cases of drug-resistant tuberculosis totaling 446. Four units: Tahoua (96), Maradi (83), Zinder (50), and Niamey (217) contribute to 18 pre-XDR TB cases. Pre-XDR TB included is 16, with 2 excluded for specific reasons.

Figure 1. Flow diagram of inclusions.

Baseline characteristics of patients

The majority of patients were male (n = 10/16) with a sex ratio of 1.67. The median age was 30.5 years [interquartile range (IQR) 25–39 years], with age extremes ranging from 20 to 80 years. The age group ≤30 years was the most represented, accounting for 50.0% (n = 8/16).

Half (8/16) of patients with pre-XDR TB were undernourished (BMI <16.5 kg/m2). The average BMI was 16.07 ± 2.92 kg/m2. Among the 16 patients included, 6 were new cases, and 10 had previously been treated with either a drug-susceptible tuberculosis regimen or a regimen for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis. None had received the earlier treatment regimen formerly used for pre-XDR TB. All patients were treated for pulmonary tuberculosis (Table 1).

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Basic characteristics of the study population.

Therapeutic data

All pre-XDR TB patients were treated with regimen C “4–6 LzdHhBdqDlmCfzZ/5 BdqDlmCfzZ,” except for one patient who received an individualized regimen C that consisted of “4 LzdHhBdqDlmCfzZ/2 HhImCsDlmBdqCfzZ/5 BdqDlmCfzZ.”

The treatment duration ranged from 9 to 11 months, with 12 out of 16 patients (75.0%) receiving a 9-month course.

During the treatment, 14 out of 16 patients (88.0%) experienced adverse drug reactions. Peripheral neuropathy and anemia were the most frequently observed, affecting 50.0% of patients, followed by hepatocellular injury in 35.7% (Table 2).

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Adverse effects experienced by patients.

Bacteriological data

The frequency of sputum smear conversion increased progressively over time, reaching a peak of 91.7% by the end of the 6th month among patients who completed treatment (Figure 2). As part of patient monitoring, 62.5% underwent culture testing at month 6, and all of them had negative cultures (Table 3).

Figure 2
Line graph showing the percentage of patients converted over nine months. Starts at 25% (n=3) in Month 1, increasing to 58.3% (n=7) by Month 2, 66.7% (n=8) by Month 4, 75% (n=9) by Month 5, 91.7% (n=11) by Month 6, and reaching 100% (n=12) by Month 9.

Figure 2. Sputum smear conversion month in patients who completed the treatment.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Bacteriological data.

According to the Hain Test, fluoroquinolone resistance was identified in 93.7% of patients (n = 15), and 68.7% (n = 11) were resistant to isoniazid, ethambutol, streptomycin, and fluoroquinolones. All patients showed mutations, with the “MUT1” mutation being the most common. Mutations conferring resistance to fluoroquinolones (gyrA and gyrB) were found in 4 patients (Table 3).

Treatment outcomes

Of the 16 patients undergoing treatment, four unfavorable outcomes were reported. One patient dropped out after 1 month for personal reasons, while three patients died during treatment, with deaths occurring at 1 month, 2 months, and 5 months, respectively. Strikingly, three of the four unfavorable outcomes (75.0%) were observed in males who also presented with a BMI under 16.5 kg/m2. However, statistical analysis revealed no significant differences in age groups, BMI categories, history of tuberculosis, or adverse effects between the favorable and unfavorable groups (p > 0.05) (Table 4). Ultimately, 12 patients completed the treatment and were declared cured.

Table 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Treatment outcomes.

Discussion

Tuberculosis remains a public health problem in sub-Saharan Africa (15). In Niger, despite health policies implemented to combat it, tuberculosis continues to persist due to financial constraints, the population's standard of living, and insufficient health infrastructure. The emergence of pre-XDR and XDR-TB forms further hinders the global fight against this disease.

The significance of this study lies in its evaluation of the new standardized regimen for the management of pre-XDR and XDR-TB. These forms of drug-resistant TB are relatively rare, and no prior studies have been conducted on them in Niger.

The majority of pre-XDR patients were male, a finding that aligns with existing tuberculosis data from Niger and suggests that men have a higher exposure risk to tuberculosis than women (16). This trend may be attributed to several societal factors: men typically engage in more active professions that involve greater social interactions, while traditional norms—especially within the predominantly Muslim community—often lead to women participating less in public life (17). This result is consistent with reports from Ethiopia, where males made up 73.68% of pre-XDR-TB cases (18). However, Darrel et al. reported a higher proportion of females (51.1%) in the Congo in 2019 (19).

The most notable sociodemographic characteristic in this study is the age of the patients. The majority of pre-XDR-TB patients were young, with a median age of 30.5 years. This shows that drug-resistant TB affects both young and older individuals. Our results align with those of Li et al. in China, who found that 67.39% of their cohort were young people aged 15–44, with a median age of 38 (20). Similar results were also reported in Algeria and Zimbabwe (21, 22).

In this study, 87.5% of patients had a BMI below the normal threshold (18.5 kg/m2). Undernutrition is a common complication in tuberculosis (TB) patients, influenced by increased basal metabolism, chronic inflammation, and anorexia resulting from pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-1, and IL-6 (23). Additionally, some patients experience a loss of appetite due to common adverse effects associated with second-line anti-tuberculosis treatments (23). This sustained inflammation contributes to muscle protein breakdown and progressive weight loss (2428). Additionally, socioeconomic factors such as food insecurity and poverty predispose some populations to malnutrition. Our results exceed those of previous reports in Nigeria, where 65% of patients had a BMI <18.5 kg/m2 (29).

In our study, 37.6% of patients were new TB cases, while 62.5% had a history of treatment. Of the latter, 30.0% relapsed, and the rest developed resistance during previous treatment (70.0%). Historically, Niger has implemented several treatment regimens for drug-resistant TB, beginning with the standard short treatment regimen (STR), which relied on second-line injectable drugs (SLIDs) and fluoroquinolones (FQs), with FQs serving as the core agents (11). Bedaquiline (Bdq), introduced in 2012, was subsequently established as the core drug for third-line regimens in patients who did not respond to or who relapsed after STR, contributing to a relapse-free cure rate of 84.7% (12). In 2016, the protocol transitioned to an adaptive short treatment regimen (aSTR), combining a SLID with linezolid (Lzd) (4–6 Am (Lzd)-Hh-Pto-Mfx-Cfz-E-Z/5 Mfx-Cfz-E-Z). Under this adaptive approach, SLIDs were replaced by Lzd.

The appearance of new pre-XDR-TB cases is concerning. In the absence of documented treatment history, these cases suggest primary transmission of resistant strains. Another aggravating factor in our context is the inappropriate and uncontrolled prescription of fluoroquinolones for common infections, creating selective pressure and promoting resistance mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (30, 31). Similar findings were reported in Nigeria, with 62.2% of patients having a history of TB (32). Although this study did not find a statistical association between prior TB and treatment outcomes, literature consistently identifies TB history as a risk factor for recurrence (33, 34).

The regimen used in this study was regimen C, which consisted of a 4–6 months intensive phase (linezolid, high-dose isoniazid, bedaquiline, delamanid, clofazimine, and pyrazinamide), followed by a 5-month continuation phase (bedaquiline, delamanid, clofazimine, and pyrazinamide). One patient received a modified regimen with imipenem and cycloserine after stopping linezolid in month five. Treatment lasted 9 months for 75.0% of patients and 11 months for 18.7%. All patients had pulmonary pre-XDR TB. No resistance to WHO group A drugs was found, explaining the absence of XDR-TB cases in this study.

Smear conversion among patients completing treatment increased from 25.0% at 1 month to 58.3% at 2 months and 91.7% by 6 months. This demonstrates the importance of adherence to treatment for effective bacteriological conversion. Culture conversion at 6 months was 62.5%. Of the 6 patients without culture data, 3 had died, and 1 was lost to follow-up. These results are lower than Franke et al. (35), who found an 89% conversion rate, and Bastard et al., with 73% (36).

Anti-tuberculosis drugs are well known for their numerous adverse effects (37, 38). In our study, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) occurred in 88% of patients. The reported events included: peripheral neuropathy (grade 1 to 4), anemia (grade 2 and 3), elevated transaminases (grade 1 and 2), epigastric pain (grade 1), renal impairment (grade 1 and 2), diarrhea (grade 1), QT interval prolongation on ECG (grade 1), and visual disturbances (grade 1). These adverse effects are consistent with the known toxicity profile of the drugs administered (9, 39). Similar findings have been reported in other studies involving drugs included in our treatment regimen, notably bedaquiline, linezolid, clofazimine, and delamanid. For instance, the multicenter endTB study (16 countries) in 2022 reported the following adverse events: peripheral neuropathy (26.4%), QT prolongation (2.7%), acute renal failure (7.6%), and hepatotoxicity (5.5%) (40). These frequencies were lower than those observed in our cohort. In our study, peripheral neuropathy, anemia, and elevated transaminases were the most common adverse events, occurring in 50%, 50%, and 35.7% of patients, respectively. Peripheral neuropathy, commonly associated with linezolid and high-dose isoniazid, was managed with pyridoxine supplementation, NSAIDs, or amitriptyline, depending on severity. Anemia, frequently observed under linezolid and clofazimine, was treated with iron and folic acid supplementation or blood transfusions when necessary. QT prolongation, expected with bedaquiline and clofazimine, warranted close ECG monitoring. Hepatotoxicity, likely multifactorial but mainly attributable to pyrazinamide and isoniazid, requires rigorous laboratory monitoring.

This study reported a 75% treatment success rate, 6.3% loss to follow-up, and 18.7% mortality. Two-thirds of the deceased patients had prior TB treatment. Despite the non-negligible mortality, the standardized regimen C yielded promising outcomes. These results are comparable to the endTB-Q and BEAT India trials, which used similar drug combinations and achieved cure rates of 87% and 91%, respectively (41, 42).

Bivariate analysis showed a trend of higher adverse outcomes among patients with BMI <16.5 kg/m2, though not statistically significant (p = 0.18). In South Africa, Hosu et al. showed that underweight patients had 25.7% lower odds of treatment success than those with normal BMI, suggesting nutritional support should be a priority in managing resistant TB (43). This correlation between low BMI and poor treatment outcomes underscores the importance of integrating nutritional support into the management of drug-resistant tuberculosis.

Our findings suggest that males experienced more unfavorable outcomes (75%) than females (25%), though the association was not statistically significant (p = 0.999). A recent study performed in Cameroon found that males were 2.5 times more likely to have poor treatment outcomes (p = 0.006), consistent with our findings (44).

Limitations

Several limitations of this study should be acknowledged. First, the main limitations of this study are its retrospective nature, the small number of cases, and the fact that the analysis focuses exclusively on pre-XDR tuberculosis cases as defined by the new WHO definition adopted in 2021, which limits the scope to this subpopulation and does not allow extrapolation to classic XDR-TB cases (45). The limited sample size significantly diminishes the statistical power required to generalize our findings to the wider population affected by pre–XDR tuberculosis. Second, while nutritional and clinical factors were suggested, they could not be explored in depth due to a lack of available data and structured nutritional monitoring. Third, no additional investigation was conducted into the patients' deaths to ascertain whether treatment was a direct cause. Some patients passed away at home, while others were reported deceased by their families weeks or even months later. Finally, drug resistance testing was not performed during the treatment follow-up. Nonetheless, this study offers valuable insights that can enhance surveillance of pre-XDR-TB in Niger and serves as foundational data for more extensive future research.

In perspective, this preliminary study lays the groundwork for more robust future research. Expanding the patient cohort, extending the study duration, and conducting investigations on a larger scale would help generate more relevant and generalizable data. Incorporating detailed clinical follow-up—including functional and physical assessments and nutritional parameters—as well as genomic diagnostic information would further strengthen the translational value of the findings. In addition, treatment monitoring should be more stringent and systematic, with updated drug-resistance testing, improved documentation of adverse events, and enhanced strategies for their management.

Conclusion

Although conducted on a small cohort of pre-XDR-TB patients, this study has highlighted several important findings. The clinical and sociodemographic characteristics reveal concerning trends, notably the high proportion of undernourished patients, the young age of those affected, and the high frequency of adverse drug reactions.

The new regimen proves effective in the management of pre-XDR-TB in Niger, with an encouraging cure rate. Emphasis should be placed on strengthening nutritional support and improving monitoring of adverse effects. This preliminary study paves the way for larger, multicentric studies to confirm these hypotheses and bolster efforts against resistant tuberculosis in our country.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by the Faculty of Health Sciences, Abdou Moumouni University Ethical Review Committee N°000033-2024/FSS/UAM/DOY/SP. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

SBS: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft. AY: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft. CA: Conceptualization, Investigation, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. IO: Investigation, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. BS: Conceptualization, Investigation, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing. AS: Conceptualization, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing. TO: Writing – review & editing. MDo: Validation, Writing – review & editing. MDa: Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. SB: Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. EA: Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. SM: Conceptualization, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.

Acknowledgments

We thank all the staff of the National Program to fight against Tuberculosis through the National Centre for the Fight against Tuberculosis and Respiratory diseases, particularly those in the drug-resistant tuberculosis unit, and the staff of the National Reference Laboratory for Tuberculosis, for their help and availability in the data collection process. Our thanks also go to all the actors who contributed directly or indirectly to the completion of this study.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Abbreviations

Bdq, Bedaquiline; BMI, Body Mass Index; Cfz, Clofazimine; Cs, Cycloserine; Dlm, Delamanid; Hh, High dose isoniazid; Im, Imipenem; Lzd, linezolid; MDR-TB, Multidrug-Resistant tuberculosis; Pre-XDR TB, Pre-extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis; TB, Tuberculosis; WHO, World Health Organization; XDR TB, Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis; Z, Pyrazinamide.

References

1. World Health Organization. Tuberculosis disease burden. Available online at: https://www.who.int/teams/global-programme-on-tuberculosis-and-lung-health/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2024/tb-disease-burden (Accessed December 3, 2025).

Google Scholar

2. Seung KJ, Keshavjee S, Rich ML. Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. (2015) 5:a017863. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a017863

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Hobby GL. Primary drug resistance in tuberculosis. Am Rev Respir Dis. (1962) 86:839–46.

Google Scholar

4. Dean AS, Tosas Auguet O, Glaziou P, Zignol M, Ismail N, Kasaeva T, et al. 25 years of surveillance of drug-resistant tuberculosis: achievements, challenges, and way forward. Lancet Infect Dis. (2022) 22:e191–6. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00808-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. WHO announces updated definitions of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. Available online at: https://www.who.int/news/item/27-01-2021-who-announces-updated-definitions-of-extensively-drug-resistant-tuberculosis (Accessed December 3, 2025).

6. Jain N, Sharma D, Jain N. Newer research transforming 24-month treatment of MDR/XDR-TB TO 6 months. Lung India. (2025) 42:140–6. doi: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_431_24

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Shibeshi W, Sheth AN, Admasu A, Berha AB, Negash Z, Yimer G. Nephrotoxicity and ototoxic symptoms of injectable second-line anti-tubercular drugs among patients treated for MDR-TB in Ethiopia: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. (2019) 20:1–10. doi: 10.1186/s40360-019-0313-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Garcia-Prats AJ, Schaaf HS, Hesseling AC. The safety and tolerability of the second-line injectable antituberculosis drugs in children. Expert Opin Drug Saf. (2016) 15:1491–500. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2016.1223623

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Nyang'wa BT, Berry C, Kazounis E, Motta I, Parpieva N, Tigay Z, et al. Short oral regimens for pulmonary rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (TB-PRACTECAL): an open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 2B-3, multi-arm, multicentre, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2024 12(2):117-28.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

10. World Health Organisation. WHO operational handbook on tuberculosis. Module 4: treatment - drug-resistant tuberculosis treatment, 2022 update. Available online at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240065116 (Accessed December 3, 2025).

Google Scholar

11. Van Deun A, Decroo T, Piubello A, de Jong BC, Lynen L, Rieder HL. Principles for constructing a tuberculosis treatment regimen: the role and definition of core and companion drugs. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. (2018) 22:239–45. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.17.0660

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Souleymane MB, Decroo T, Mamadou S, Soumana A, Lawan IM, Gagara-Issoufou A, et al. Definitive outcomes in patients with rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis treated in Niger from 2012 to 2019: a retrospective cohort study. Int Health. (2023) 15:258–64. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihac016

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Souleymane MB, Decroo T, Soumana A, Maman Lawan I, Gagara-Issoufou A, Halidou-Moussa S, et al. Safety, effectiveness, and adherence of a short and all-oral treatment regimen for the treatment of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis in Niger: a study protocol of a pragmatic randomised clinical trial with stratified block randomisation. Trials. (2022) 23:1011. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06912-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Ibrahim M, Andries K, Lounis N, Chauffour A, Truffot-Pernot C, Jarlier V, et al. Synergistic activity of R207910 combined with pyrazinamide against murine tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. (2007) 51:1011–5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00898-06

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Zhang T, Zhang J, Wei L, Liang H, Zhang J, Shi D, et al. The global, regional, and national burden of tuberculosis in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019. J Infect Public Health. (2023) 16:368–75. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2023.01.014

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Souleymane MB, Decroo T, Soumana A, Lawan IM, Aboubacar ALC, Gagara-Issoufou A, et al. Using linezolid as a substitute for the injectable in case of ototoxicity is safer and as effective as all-oral treatment for rifampicin-resistant TB. IJTLD OPEN. (2025) 2:450–8. doi: 10.5588/ijtldopen.25.0151

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Oladimeji O, Atiba BP, Anyiam FE, Odugbemi BA, Afolaranmi T, Zoakah AI, et al. Gender and drug-resistant tuberculosis in Nigeria. Trop Med Infect Dis. (2023) 8:104. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed8020104

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Diriba G, Alemu A, Tola HH, Yenew B, Amare M, Eshetu K, et al. Pre-extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis among multidrug-resistant tuberculosis patients in Ethiopia: a laboratory-based surveillance study. IJID Reg. (2022) 5:39–43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijregi.2022.08.012

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Elion Assiana DO, Abdul JBPA, Linguissi LSG, Epola M, Vouvoungui JC, Mabiala A, et al. Epidemiological profile of multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant Mycobacterium Tubrculosis among Congolese patients. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. (2021) 20:84. doi: 10.1186/s12941-021-00488-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Li Z, Liu F, Chen H, Han Y, You Y, Xie Y, et al. A five-year review of prevalence and treatment outcomes of pre-extensively drug-resistant plus additional drug-resistant tuberculosis in the Henan Provincial Tuberculosis Clinical Medicine Research Centre. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. (2022) 31:328–36. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2022.09.010

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Hadjer N, Haddad L, Nacef L, Aberrahim S, Azouz Y, Ouladkouider M, et al. États des lieux de la tuberculose multi- ou pré-ultrarésistante dans une région de l'Ouest de l'Algérie de 2004 à 2024. Rev Mal Respir Actual. (2025) 17:197. doi: 10.1016/j.rmra.2024.11.412

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Sagonda T, Mupfumi L, Manzou R, Makamure B, Tshabalala M, Gwanzura L, et al. Prevalence of Extensively Drug Resistant Tuberculosis among Archived Multidrug Resistant Tuberculosis Isolates in Zimbabwe. Tuberc Res Treat. (2014) 2014:349141. doi: 10.1155/2014/349141

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Fâcă AI, Udeanu DI, Arsene AL, Mahler B, Drăgănescu D, Apetroaei MM. Nutritional deficiencies and management in tuberculosis: pharmacotherapeutic and clinical implications. Nutrients. (2025) 17:1878. doi: 10.3390/nu17111878

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. World Health Organization. Guideline: nutritional care and support for patients with tuberculosis. Geneva: World Health Organization (2013). Available online at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241506410 (Accessed June 2, 2025).

Google Scholar

25. van Lettow M, Harries AD, Kumwenda JJ, Zijlstra EE, Clark TD, Taha TE, et al. Micronutrient malnutrition and wasting in adults with pulmonary tuberculosis with and without HIV co-infection in Malawi. BMC Infect Dis. (2004) 4:61. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-4-61

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Zheng Y, Ma A, Wang Q, Han X, Cai J, Schouten EG, et al. Relation of leptin, ghrelin and inflammatory cytokines with body mass index in pulmonary tuberculosis patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus. PLoS ONE. (2013) 8:e80122. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080122

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Feleke BE, Feleke TE, Biadglegne F. Nutritional status of tuberculosis patients, a comparative cross-sectional study. BMC Pulm Med. (2019) 19:182. doi: 10.1186/s12890-019-0953-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Sinha P, Davis J, Saag L, Wanke C, Salgame P, Mesick J, et al. Undernutrition and tuberculosis: public health implications. J Infect Dis. (2019) 219:1356–63. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiy675

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Fadeyi MO, Decroo T, Ortuño-Gutiérrez N, Ahmed B, Jinadu A, El-Tayeb O, et al. A four-drug standardized short regimen for highly resistant TB in South-West Nigeria. Int Health. (2023) 16:123–5. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihad023

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Devasia RA, Blackman A, Gebretsadik T, Griffin M, Shintani A, May C, et al. Fluoroquinolone resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2009) 180:365–70. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200901-0146OC

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. van der Heijden YF, Maruri F, Blackman A, Mitchel E, Bian A, Shintani AK, et al. Fluoroquinolone susceptibility in Mycobacterium tuberculosis after pre-diagnosis exposure to older- versus newer-generation fluoroquinolones. Int J Antimicrob Agents. (2013) 42:232–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2013.04.027

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Nwachukwu NO, Ulasi AE, Okoronkwo CU, Unegbu VN. Pre-extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis among pulmonary multidrug-resistant tuberculosis patients in Eastern Nigeria. Lung India. (2023) 40:492–5. doi: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_337_23

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Millet JP, Shaw E, Orcau À, Casals M, Miró JM, Caylà JA. Tuberculosis recurrence after completion treatment in a European city: reinfection or relapse? PLoS ONE. (2013) 8:e64898. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064898

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Afshar B, Carless J, Roche A, Balasegaram S, Anderson C. Surveillance of tuberculosis (TB) cases attributable to relapse or reinfection in London, 2002-2015. PLoS ONE. (2019) 14:e0211972. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211972

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Franke MF, Khan P, Hewison C, Khan U, Huerga H, Seung KJ, et al. Culture conversion in patients treated with bedaquiline and/or delamanid. A prospective multicountry study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2021) 203:111–9. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202001-0135OC

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Bastard M, Guglielmetti L, Huerga H, Hayrapetyan A, Khachatryan N, Yegiazaryan L, et al. Bedaquiline and repurposed drugs for fluoroquinolone-resistant multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: how much better are they? Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2018) 198:1228–31. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201801-0019LE

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Forget EJ, Menzies D. Adverse reactions to first-line antituberculosis drugs. Expert Opin Drug Saf. (2006) 5:231–49. doi: 10.1517/14740338.5.2.231

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Lan Z, Ahmad N, Baghaei P, Barkane L, Benedetti A, Brode SK, et al. Drug-associated adverse events in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Lancet Respir Med. (2020) 8:383–94. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30047-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Korotych O, Achar J, Gurbanova E, Hovhannesyan A, Lomtadze N, Ciobanu A, et al. Effectiveness and safety of modified fully oral 9-month treatment regimens for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. (2024) 24:1151–61. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(24)00228-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Hewison C, Khan U, Bastard M, Lachenal N, Coutisson S, Osso E, et al. Safety of treatment regimens containing bedaquiline and delamanid in the endTB cohort. Clin Infect Dis. (2022) 75:1006–13. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac019

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Padmapriyadarsini C, Vohra V, Bhatnagar A, Solanki R, Sridhar R, Anande L, et al. Bedaquiline, delamanid, linezolid, and clofazimine for treatment of pre-extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis. (2023) 76:e938–46.

Google Scholar

42. Patil SB, Tamirat M, Khazhidinov K, Ardizzoni E, Atger M, Austin A, et al. Evaluating newly approved drugs in combination regimens for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis with fluoroquinolone resistance (endTB-Q): study protocol for a multi-country randomized controlled trial. Trials. (2023)24:773.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

43. Hosu MC, Faye LM, Apalata T. Comorbidities and treatment outcomes in patients diagnosed with drug-resistant tuberculosis in rural eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Diseases. (2024) 12:296. doi: 10.3390/diseases12110296

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Mbuh TP, Mendjime P, Goupeyou-Wandji IA, Donkeng-Donfack VF, Kahou J, Endale Mangamba LM, et al. Trends of drug-resistant tuberculosis and risk factors to poor treatment-outcome: a database analysis in Littoral region-Cameroon, 2013–2022. BMC Public Health. (2024) 24:3195. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20585-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. World Health Organisation. Meeting report of the WHO expert consultation on the definition of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. (2020). Available online at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240018662 (Accessed December 3, 2025).

Google Scholar

Keywords: bedaquiline, delamanid, Niger, regimen C, XDR-tuberculosis

Citation: Boubacar Soumana S, Yacouba A, Abdoul Lawi CA, Oumar I, Souleymane B, Soumana A, Ounoussa T, Doutchi M, Daou M, Brah S, Adehossi E and Mamadou S (2026) Evaluation of a short, all oral treatment regimen including bedaquiline, delamanid, linezolid, clofazimine, and pyrazinamide named “Regimen C” for pre-XDR tuberculosis in Niger. Front. Tuberc. 3:1718997. doi: 10.3389/ftubr.2025.1718997

Received: 05 October 2025; Revised: 13 December 2025;
Accepted: 15 December 2025; Published: 13 January 2026.

Edited by:

Hemant Joshi, University of California, San Francisco, United States

Reviewed by:

Justice Tresor Ngom, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
Charles Hornel Koudokpon, Research Unit of Applied Microbiology and Pharmacology of Natural Substances, Benin

Copyright © 2026 Boubacar Soumana, Yacouba, Abdoul Lawi, Oumar, Souleymane, Soumana, Ounoussa, Doutchi, Daou, Brah, Adehossi and Mamadou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Abdourahamane Yacouba, YWJkb3VyYWhhbWFuZXlhY291YmFAeWFob28uZnI=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.