Beyond Sequence Analysis: Integrating Quantitative Methods into Conversation Analysis

  • 96

    Total views and downloads

About this Research Topic

Submission deadlines

  1. Manuscript Summary Submission Deadline 15 September 2025 | Manuscript Submission Deadline 28 February 2026

  2. This Research Topic is still accepting articles.

Background

This Research Topic addresses the opportunities and challenges of integrating quantitative methods in the study of social interaction. Over the past few decades, the quantification and statistical analysis of linguistic data have gained significant traction across various subfields of linguistics. More recently, scholars within Conversation Analysis (CA) and related disciplines such as Interactional Linguistics have begun to question the field’s traditionally exclusive reliance on qualitative methods, particularly sequential analysis. They argue that in order to strengthen the empirical basis of findings and increase the visibility and impact of interactional research, it is essential to incorporate larger datasets and state-of-the-art quantitative methods.

This shift, however, has not gone uncontested. Some CA practitioners have raised concerns that quantitative approaches risk flattening the complexity of interactional data. Since the circumstances of any given interaction are always locally occasioned and contingent, coding practices—however carefully designed—inevitably require abstraction. As Schegloff (1993, 103) famously noted, interactions are not “analytically coherent universes.” Consequently, coding can be seen as forcing the multifaceted realities of talk-in-interaction into predefined categories, potentially obscuring nuances that are meaningful to participants themselves.

We fully acknowledge these concerns and emphasize that quantitative analysis cannot—and should not—replace the detailed, context-sensitive work that lies at the heart of CA. However, we maintain that many core questions in the field are best addressed through a combination of methods. Mixed-methods approaches, which integrate the precision and generalizability of quantitative analysis with the depth and sensitivity of qualitative interpretation, offer powerful tools for advancing our understanding of intersubjective meaning-making. Crucially, such approaches require datasets that are not only large enough to support statistical claims but also representative and sufficiently rich to allow for microanalytic scrutiny.

With this Research Topic, we aim to bring together contributions that explore how qualitative and quantitative methods can be fruitfully combined in the analysis of social interaction. We welcome empirical studies that demonstrate innovative mixed-methods approaches, critical reflections on the methodological and epistemological implications of quantification in CA, as well as theoretical contributions that address the potential tensions between analytic depth and generalizability. In addition, we are further interested in work that engages with the practical challenges of implementing such approaches, such as increased workload, the development of reliable coding schemes, and the need for interdisciplinary collaboration and computational tools. Our goal is to foster dialogue across methodological boundaries and to advance a more robust, scalable, and reflexive form of interaction research; one that remains grounded in the core principles of CA and keeps an open mind to the opportunities and challenges of mixing methods.

Relevant subtopics include, but are not limited to:

• challenges and strategies for coding interactional data
• quantitative and corpus-based approaches to visual and embodied meaning-making
• the integration of multimodal cues (e.g., gaze, gesture, and posture) into pattern analysis
• the role of sequence analysis in identifying and validating recurrent interactional patterns
• mixed-methods approaches in the analysis of preference structures, repair, turn-taking, or action formation
• cross-linguistic or cross-cultural comparisons of interactional practices using large datasets.

We particularly encourage submissions that reflect on the epistemological implications, practical hurdles, and analytical affordances of quantification in the context of richly situated interactional practices. Studies that draw on technological innovations (e.g., mobile eyetracking, AOI technology, pupillometry, and motion capturing) to record and analyze interactional data are particularly welcome.

Research Topic Research topic image

Article types and fees

This Research Topic accepts the following article types, unless otherwise specified in the Research Topic description:

  • Brief Research Report
  • Case Report
  • Clinical Trial
  • Community Case Study
  • Conceptual Analysis
  • Data Report
  • Editorial
  • General Commentary
  • Hypothesis and Theory

Articles that are accepted for publication by our external editors following rigorous peer review incur a publishing fee charged to Authors, institutions, or funders.

Keywords: quantitative methods, social interaction, conversation analysis, coding, mixed-method approaches

Important note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.

Topic editors

Frequently asked questions

  • Frontiers' Research Topics are collaborative hubs built around an emerging theme.Defined, managed, and led by renowned researchers, they bring communities together around a shared area of interest to stimulate collaboration and innovation.

    Unlike section journals, which serve established specialty communities, Research Topics are pioneer hubs, responding to the evolving scientific landscape and catering to new communities.

  • The goal of Frontiers' publishing program is to empower research communities to actively steer the course of scientific publishing. Our program was implemented as a three-part unit with fixed field journals, flexible specialty sections, and dynamically emerging Research Topics, connecting communities of different sizes and maturity.

    Research Topics originate from the scientific community. Many of our Research Topics are suggested by existing editorial board members who have identified critical challenges or areas of interest in their field.

  • As an editor, Research Topics will help you build your journal, as well as your community, around emerging, cutting-edge research. As research trailblazers, Research Topics attract high-quality submissions from leading experts all over the world.

    A thriving Research Topic can potentially evolve into a new specialty section if there is sustained interest and a growing community around it.

  • Each Research Topic must be approved by the specialty chief editor, and it falls under the editorial oversight of our editorial boards, supported by our in-house research integrity team. The same standards and rigorous peer review processes apply to articles published as part of a Research Topic as for any other article we publish.

    In 2023, 80% of the Research Topics we published were edited or co-edited by our editorial board members, who are already familiar with their journal's scope, ethos, and publishing model. All other topics are guest edited by leaders in their field, each vetted and formally approved by the specialty chief editor.

  • Publishing your article within a Research Topic with other related articles increases its discoverability and visibility, which can lead to more views, downloads, and citations. Research Topics grow dynamically as more published articles are added, causing frequent revisiting, and further visibility.

    As Research Topics are multidisciplinary, they are cross-listed in several fields and section journals – increasing your reach even more and giving you the chance to expand your network and collaborate with researchers in different fields, all focusing on expanding knowledge around the same important topic.

    Our larger Research Topics are also converted into ebooks and receive social media promotion from our digital marketing team.

  • Frontiers offers multiple article types, but it will depend on the field and section journals in which the Research Topic will be featured. The available article types for a Research Topic will appear in the drop-down menu during the submission process.

    Check available article types here 

  • Yes, we would love to hear your ideas for a topic. Most of our Research Topics are community-led and suggested by researchers in the field. Our in-house editorial team will contact you to talk about your idea and whether you’d like to edit the topic. If you’re an early-stage researcher, we will offer you the opportunity to coordinate your topic, with the support of a senior researcher as the topic editor. 

    Suggest your topic here 

  • A team of guest editors (called topic editors) lead their Research Topic. This editorial team oversees the entire process, from the initial topic proposal to calls for participation, the peer review, and final publications.

    The team may also include topic coordinators, who help the topic editors send calls for participation, liaise with topic editors on abstracts, and support contributing authors. In some cases, they can also be assigned as reviewers.

  • As a topic editor (TE), you will take the lead on all editorial decisions for the Research Topic, starting with defining its scope. This allows you to curate research around a topic that interests you, bring together different perspectives from leading researchers across different fields and shape the future of your field. 

    You will choose your team of co-editors, curate a list of potential authors, send calls for participation and oversee the peer review process, accepting or recommending rejection for each manuscript submitted.

  • As a topic editor, you're supported at every stage by our in-house team. You will be assigned a single point of contact to help you on both editorial and technical matters. Your topic is managed through our user-friendly online platform, and the peer review process is supported by our industry-first AI review assistant (AIRA).

  • If you’re an early-stage researcher, we will offer you the opportunity to coordinate your topic, with the support of a senior researcher as the topic editor. This provides you with valuable editorial experience, improving your ability to critically evaluate research articles and enhancing your understanding of the quality standards and requirements for scientific publishing, as well as the opportunity to discover new research in your field, and expand your professional network.

  • Yes, certificates can be issued on request. We are happy to provide a certificate for your contribution to editing a successful Research Topic.

  • Research Topics thrive on collaboration and their multi-disciplinary approach around emerging, cutting-edge themes, attract leading researchers from all over the world.

  • As a topic editor, you can set the timeline for your Research Topic, and we will work with you at your pace. Typically, Research Topics are online and open for submissions within a few weeks and remain open for participation for 6 – 12 months. Individual articles within a Research Topic are published as soon as they are ready.

    Find out more about our Research Topics

  • Our fee support program ensures that all articles that pass peer review, including those published in Research Topics, can benefit from open access – regardless of the author's field or funding situation.

    Authors and institutions with insufficient funding can apply for a discount on their publishing fees. A fee support application form is available on our website.

  • In line with our mission to promote healthy lives on a healthy planet, we do not provide printed materials. All our articles and ebooks are available under a CC-BY license, so you can share and print copies.

Manuscripts can be submitted to this Research Topic via the main journal or any other participating journal.

Impact

  • 96Topic views
View impact