The diagnostic armamentarium for solid tumors is evolving rapidly, redefining how we detect, stage, stratify, monitor, and ultimately treat cancer. This Research Topic invites original research, reviews, mini-reviews, brief reports, technology reports, and perspectives that advance clinically actionable diagnostics across the continuum of care. We aim to spotlight innovations that translate molecular and spatial insights into decisions that improve outcomes, streamline pathways, and personalize therapy while addressing health-system realities such as cost, access, and workflow integration.
We welcome contributions spanning multi-omics assays (genomics, transcriptomics, epigenomics, proteomics, metabolomics), radiomics and pathomics, advanced imaging, liquid biopsy (ctDNA, cfRNA, CTCs, EVs), and AI-enabled decision support. Studies should emphasize analytical validity, clinical validity, and clinical utility—ideally in real-world or prospective settings—and clarify how new tests complement or outperform standard histopathology and tissue-based sequencing. Equally important are works that tackle pre-analytical variables, standardization, quality assurance, and regulatory readiness, including multicenter reproducibility and reporting frameworks.
Priority subthemes include:
o Early detection and minimal residual disease (MRD): sensitivity/specificity benchmarks, longitudinal surveillance, and implications for adjuvant therapy.
o Spatial biology and digital pathology: multiplex imaging, spatial transcriptomics, and AI/pathomics for tumor–immune microenvironment profiling and response prediction.
o Radiomics and imaging biomarkers: harmonization across scanners, multimodal fusion with molecular data, and predictive models for treatment selection.
o Liquid biopsy in hard-to-biopsy or heterogeneous tumors: resistance evolution, tumor dynamics, and actionable alterations in real time.
o Companion diagnostics and theranostics: targeted, immuno-, cellular, and radiopharmaceutical therapies; adaptive trial designs and biomarker-driven endpoints.
o Equity, implementation science, and cost-effectiveness: pragmatic pathways for community oncology, LMIC settings, and value-based care.
o Data standards and interpretability: transparent AI, federated learning, and clinically meaningful reporting that supports tumor boards and shared decision-making.
Submissions that include rigorous methodology, transparent datasets and code, and clear clinical endpoints are strongly encouraged. We particularly seek cross-disciplinary efforts linking oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, molecular scientists, data scientists, and health economists to close the gap between diagnostic innovation and improved patient survival and quality of life. By curating evidence across these fronts, this Research Topic aims to chart practical, scalable routes for integrating next-generation diagnostics into routine management of solid tumors.
Article types and fees
This Research Topic accepts the following article types, unless otherwise specified in the Research Topic description:
Brief Research Report
Case Report
Clinical Trial
Editorial
FAIR² Data
FAIR² DATA Direct Submission
General Commentary
Hypothesis and Theory
Methods
Articles that are accepted for publication by our external editors following rigorous peer review incur a publishing fee charged to Authors, institutions, or funders.
Article types
This Research Topic accepts the following article types, unless otherwise specified in the Research Topic description:
Brief Research Report
Case Report
Clinical Trial
Editorial
FAIR² Data
FAIR² DATA Direct Submission
General Commentary
Hypothesis and Theory
Methods
Mini Review
Opinion
Original Research
Perspective
Review
Systematic Review
Technology and Code
Keywords: Solid tumor diagnostics, Liquid biopsy (ctDNA/cfRNA/CTCs), Multi-omics and spatial biology, Radiomics and digital pathology (pathomics), Minimal residual disease (MRD) and early detection, Clinical utility and companion diagnostics
Important note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.