Abstract
Strawberry anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum spp. is considered one of the most serious and destructive disease of strawberry worldwide. Weeds, as possible hosts of the pathogen, could have a role as potential inoculum reservoir. To prove this hypothesis, symptomless weeds were collected in strawberry fields showing anthracnose symptoms in Iran. Ten isolates with Colletotrichum-like colonies were recovered from symptomless Amaranthus viridis L., Convolvulus arvensis L., Fumaria officinalis L., Lactuca serriola L., and Sonchus oleraceus L. plants. The isolates were identified as C. nymphaeae, based on a combination of morphological and sequence data of TUB and GADPH genes. This identification was further validated using Rep-PCR fingerprinting analysis, which produces species-specific DNA fingerprints and unveils inter and intra variation of the species examined in this study. Moreover, rep-PCR marker was used to reveal accurate taxonomic position of Colletorichum spp. causing strawberry anthracnose belonging to the C. acutatum complex, including C. acutatum sensu stricto, C. fiorinae, C. godetiae, C. nymphaeae, C. salicis, and C. simmondsii. The C. nymphaeae isolates originating from symptomless weeds confirmed their pathogenicity on detached strawberry, proving that weeds in strawberry field may have a role as reservoir of inoculum. However, further studies are necessary to quantify their actual contribution to anthracnose epidemics in strawberry fields.
Introduction
Colletotrichum spp. are among the most widespread and destructive phytopathogenic fungi worldwide. The inclusion of these species among the top 10 fungal pathogens indicates their economic importance and also justifies the interest of scientists (Dean et al., 2012). Most Colletotrichum spp., viz. C. acutatum, C. gloeosporioides, C. dematium, C. destructivum, C. gigasporum, C. boninense and C. orbiculare, are known as complex species comprising different cryptic species (Damm et al., 2009, 2012a,b, 2013, 2014; Weir et al., 2012; Liu et al., 2014). Nearly all crops worldwide are susceptible to one or more species of Colletotrichum (Dean et al., 2012). Strawberry is an important and valuable crop and it is frequently infected by Colletotrichum spp. (Freeman and Katan, 1997; Karimi et al., 2017). Anthracnose, the main disease symptom caused by these fungal pathogens, was initially used to name the destructive disease of strawberry caused by Colletotrichum fragariae Brooks (Howard et al., 1992). Three species C. acutatum, C. gloeosporioides and C. fragariae, are commonly indicated as the causal agents of anthracnose on strawberry (Howard et al., 1992; Freeman and Katan, 1997). However, the advent of new molecular approaches, such as multi-gene approach in fungal taxonomy, combined with traditional diagnostic methods (polyphasic approach), revealed that C. acutatum and C. gloeosporioides are complex species, comprising several species causing anthracnose symptoms on strawberry (Damm et al., 2012a; Weir et al., 2012; Karimi et al., 2017). Nowadays, multi-gene technique is mainly used as the most confident approach to reveal cryptic species among complex species of fungi, particularly Colletotrichum spp. (Damm et al., 2009, 2012a, 2014). However, this method is expensive and not accessible for many mycologists all over the world. Therefore, alternative PCR-based genomic fingerprinting, such as rep-PCR, can be very useful to resolve cryptic species. Rep-PCR fingerprinting was originally developed to amplify sequences located between repetitive elements in prokaryotic genomes. However, various studies proved that this molecular marker is capable to provide the fingerprinting of eukaryotic genomes, including fungi (Mehta et al., 2002; Godoy et al., 2004; Alves et al., 2007).
Colletotrichum nymphaeae, one of the members of C. acutatum complex species, seems to be the most common and devastating Colletotrichum sp. on strawberry worldwide, including Iran (Damm et al., 2012a; Baroncelli et al., 2015; Karimi et al., 2017). Besides strawberry, this pathogen can cause anthracnose on other important crops, namely apple, pepper, grapevine and celery (Velho et al., 2014; Yamagishi et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2016; Nasehi et al., 2016). Colletotrichum nymphaeae has become a serious problem, threatening strawberry industry in Iran, since its first outbreak in 2013 (Karimi et al., 2017). Different conventional methods, including chemical fungicides, crop sanitation, cultural methods, and resistant cultivars, are used to control the disease (Smith, 2013). It was originally assumed that the primary infection in strawberry fields starts from infected plants growing near the strawberry field (Smith, 2013), since most of the Colletotrichum spp. such as C. nymphaeae may infect many other hosts than strawberry, including common weeds. Therefore, if this hypothesis is true, the identification and eradication of alternative hosts harboring the pathogen in order to remove pathogen inoculum could become a crucial agronomic practice to prevent infections of strawberry plants. The fact that many alternative hosts, including weeds, may not show any typical symptoms of anthracnose disease due to endophytic nature of Colletotrichum spp., could let growers to underestimate the risk. Limited knowledge is available on the potential role of weeds in the epidemiology of Colletotrichum acutatum sensu lato in strawberry anthracnose (Berrie and Burgess, 2003). In particular, (Berrie and Burgess, 2003) noticed that the pathogen can overwinter on weeds and survive on infected crop debris in absence of strawberry.
In our study, we isolated a Colletotrichum sp. from symptomless common weeds across the anthracnose-infected strawberry fields in Iran (Kurdistan province) and we compared them with type strains of C. nymphaeae, C. acutatum sensu stricto, C. godetiae, C. fioriniae, C. salicis and C. simmondsii, belonging to the C. acutatum seneu lato, in terms of morphological, molecular and pathogenicity.
Materials and Methods
Sampling and Isolation
The strawberry fields across Sanandaj and Kamyaran counties (Supplementary Figure 1) (two main areas of strawberry production in Kurdistan province, Iran), were inspected from May to June 2017. In this study, anthracnose-infected fields were identified and weeds were collected inside and around those fields with focusing mostly on broad-leaved weeds, because it has been previously determined that C. acutatum sensu lato can be mainly found on those plants (Berrie and Burgess, 2003). Symptomless common weeds across anthracnose-infected strawberry fields were collected and transferred to the lab inside facial bags. In the lab, different plant parts of each sample (leaf, stem, and root) were superficially disinfected by immersion in 90 % ethanol for 1 min, 1 % solution of sodium hypochlorite for 4 min and rinsed three times in sterile distilled water. All plant parts were left to dry on sterile Whatman paper under laminar flow hood. The plant parts were then cultured on potato dextrose agar (PDA; Sigma Aldrich, UK) and monitored for fungal growth on a daily base. Single spore cultures were established on water agar as described by Arzanlou et al. (2015) from colonies growing on PDA. Purified isolates were long term stored on home-made potato carrot agar (20 gr potatoes, 20 gr carrots, 20 gr technical agar per liter) at 4°C for further investigations. Fungal type strains of C. nymphaeae (CBS 515.78), C. acutatum sensu stricto (CBS 112996), C. godetiae (CBS 133.44), C. fioriniae (CBS 128517), C. salicis (CBS 607.94), and C. simmondsii (CBS 122122) were purchased from Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, The Netherlands.
Morphological Description
Macro morphological features of fungal isolates including colony characterization and growth rate were studied on PDA, malt extracts agar (MEA; Sigma Aldrich, UK) and oat meal agar (OA; Sigma Aldrich, UK) as described by Karimi et al. (2017). Color charts of Rayner (1970) was used to rate the color of colonies.
DNA Extraction, Amplification, And Sequencing
Total genomic DNA of fungal isolates was extracted using a Fast DNA spin kit for soil (MP Biomedical, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. DNA quantification was determined using NanoDrop 8000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA) and proportional dilutions were made. The genomic regions of beta-tubulin (TUB) and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) were amplified with PCR, using the primer sets T1/Bt-2b (Glass and Donaldson, 1995; O'Donnell and Cigelnik, 1997) and GDF1/GDR1 (Guerber et al., 2003), respectively. The reaction mixture of the PCR was prepared in a total volume of 25 μl by mixing 1 μl (50 ng/ μl) of extracted DNA, 1 μl (0.2 μM) of forward and reverse primers, 9.5 μl of nuclease free sterile water and 12.5 μl of DreamTaq Green PCR Master Mix (Fermentase). PCR for TUB and GAPDH was carried out in a Biometra T Professional thermal cycler, as described by Karimi et al. (2016): an initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles of 30 s at 95°C, 30 s at 52°C and 30 s at 72°C and final extension at 72°C for 7 min. Amplified products were visualized on 1% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide. The products were then purified with Exo-Sap enzyme (Euroclone S.p.a., Italy), according to the manufacturer's instructions and sequenced using a BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, USA).
Phylogenetic Analysis
Consensus sequences were established from raw trace files of forward and reverse primers using Staden package program ver. 2.0.0b9 (Staden, 1996). The assembled sequences were subjected to BLAST searches of the GenBank database hosted by NCBI as queries. Two alignments were made for each of the two markers used in this study, by comparing downloaded sequences with the highest similarity and sequences of type species obtained from relevant literature for C. acutatum complex (Damm et al., 2012a). Sequences were then aligned with the Muscle software (Edgar, 2004) implemented in Mega6 (Tamura et al., 2013) and manually checked when necessary. Multi-gene analyses were performed using concatenated datasets of TUB and GAPDH made by Mesquite software (Maddison and Maddison, 2018).
For each alignment, the best evolutionary model was calculated using the software MrModelTest v. 2.3 (Nylander, 2004). All analyses were performed using MrBayes v. 3.2.1 (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck, 2003), with heating parameter set at 0.15, and four MCMC running up to 1000000 generations and sampling trees every 1,000 generations. Satisfactory convergence was assessed using the standard deviation of split frequency. The first 25% of saved trees were discarded as the burn-in, and consensus trees and their posterior probabilities (PP) were determined from the remaining trees. The generated phylogenetic trees were inspected and printed using FigTree v. 1.3.1 (Rambaut, 2009). Two strains of C. orchidophilum (CBS 128556 and CBS 632.80) were used as out-group taxa during phylogenetic analysis (Damm et al., 2012a). Sequences derived from this study were deposited at NCBI's GenBank nucleotide database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov; Table 1).
Table 1
| Species | Accession no.1 | Host/substrate | Country | GenBank no. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GAPDH | TUB2 | ||||
| C. acutatum | CBS 112996* | Carica papaya | Australia | JQ948677 | JQ005860 |
| C. fioriniae | CBS 128517* | Fiorinia externa (elongate hemlock scale, insect) | USA | JQ948622 | JQ949943 |
| CBS 127611 | Fragaria × ananassa | USA | JQ948658 | JQ949979 | |
| CBS 128529 | Fragaria × ananassa, root | New Zealand | JQ948661 | JQ949982 | |
| IMI 345575 | Fragaria × ananassa, lesion | New Zealand | JQ948662 | JQ949983 | |
| IMI 345578 | Fragaria × ananassa | New Zealand | JQ948664 | JQ949985 | |
| IMI 345583 | Fragaria × ananassa, lesion | New Zealand | JQ948663 | JQ949984 | |
| C. godetiae | CBS 133.44* | Clarkia hybrida, cv. Kelvon Glory, seed | Denmark | JQ948733 | JQ950053 |
| CBS 125972 | Fragaria × ananassa | Netherlands | JQ948747 | JQ950067 | |
| CBS 126503 | Fragaria × ananassa | UK | JQ948751 | JQ950071 | |
| CBS 126516 | Fragaria × ananassa, fruit rot | Netherlands | JQ948749 | JQ950069 | |
| C. nymphaeae | CBS 515.78* | Nymphaea alba, leaf spot | Netherlands | JQ948527 | JQ949848 |
| CBS 122110 | Fragaria × ananassa cv. Redchief fruit rot | Bulgaria | JQ948565 | JQ949886 | |
| CBS 125958 | Fragaria × ananassa, seed | Netherlands | JQ948575 | JQ949896 | |
| CBS 125959 | Fragaria × ananassa, seed | Netherlands | JQ948576 | JQ949897 | |
| CBS 126366 | Fragaria × ananassa | USA | JQ948585 | JQ949906 | |
| CBS 126367 | Fragaria × ananassa | USA | JQ948586 | JQ949907 | |
| CBS 126370 | Fragaria × ananassa | USA | JQ948587 | JQ949908 | |
| CBS 126504 | Fragaria × ananassa | South Africa | JQ948595 | JQ949916 | |
| CBS 127608 | Fragaria × ananassa | Canada | JQ948594 | JQ949915 | |
| CBS 127609 | Fragaria × ananassa | USA | JQ948590 | JQ949911 | |
| CBS 127610 | Fragaria × ananassa | USA | JQ948591 | JQ949912 | |
| CBS 129933 | Fragaria × ananassa | USA | JQ948592 | JQ949913 | |
| CBS 129936 | Fragaria × ananassa | Israel | JQ948582 | JQ949903 | |
| CBS 129937 | Fragaria × ananassa | Israel | JQ948583 | JQ949904 | |
| IMI 301119 | Fragaria vesca | Kenya | JQ948596 | JQ949917 | |
| IMI 311743 | Fragaria sp., fruit lesion | USA | JQ948588 | JQ949909 | |
| IMI 324995 | Fragaria × ananassa | USA | JQ948589 | JQ949910 | |
| IMI 360928 | Fragaria × ananassa, fruit lesion | Switzerland | JQ948573 | JQ949894 | |
| IMI 364856, | Fragaria × ananassa, crown | Spain | JQ948574 | JQ949895 | |
| IMI 391664 | Fragaria × ananassa | Israel | JQ948581 | JQ949902 | |
| IMI 348177 | Fragaria × ananassa, crown | USA | JQ948593 | JQ949914 | |
| IMI 348497 | Fragaria × ananassa, crown | France | JQ948570 | JQ949891 | |
| CBS 126377 | Fragaria × ananassa | Netherlands | JQ948563 | JQ949884 | |
| IMI 299103 | Fragaria vesca | UK | JQ948561 | JQ949882 | |
| IMI 345032 | Fragaria × ananassa, fruit | Italy | JQ948571 | JQ949892 | |
| IMI 348502 | Fragaria × ananassa, crown | France | JQ948568 | JQ949889 | |
| CBS 127612 | Fragaria × ananassa | USA | JQ948560 | JQ949881 | |
| CCTUFN3 | Fragaria × ananassa, fruit | Iran | KX592833 | KX592846 | |
| CCTUFS8 | Fragaria × ananassa, fruit | Iran | KX592834 | KX592847 | |
| CCTUSN1 | Fragaria × ananassa, stem | Iran | KX592838 | KX592852 | |
| CCTUSN2 | Fragaria × ananassa, stem | Iran | KX592839 | KX592853 | |
| CCTUST1 | Healthy Sonchus oleraceus | Iran | MH250132 | MH250122 | |
| CCTUST2 | Healthy Sonchus oleraceus | Iran | MH250133 | MH250123 | |
| CCTUST3 | Healthy Sonchus oleraceus | Iran | MH250134 | MH250124 | |
| CCTUST4 | Healthy Sonchus oleraceus | Iran | MH250135 | MH250125 | |
| CCTUSh1 | Health Fumaria officinalis | Iran | MH250136 | MH250126 | |
| CCTUSh2 | Healthy Fumaria officinalis | Iran | MH250137 | MH250127 | |
| CCTUT | Healthy Amaranthus viridis | Iran | MH250138 | MH250128 | |
| CCTUK | Healthy Lactuca serriola | Iran | MH250139 | MH250129 | |
| CCTUP1 | Healthy Convolvulus arvensis | Iran | MH250140 | MH250130 | |
| CCTUP2 | Healthy Convolvulus arvensis | Iran | MH250141 | MH250131 | |
| C. orchidophilum | CBS 632.80* | Dendrobium sp. | USA | JQ948481 | JQ949802 |
| CBS 119291 | Cycnoches aureum | Panama | JQ948484 | JQ949805 | |
| C. salicis | CBS 607.94* | Salix sp., leaf, spot | Netherlands | JQ948791 | JQ950111 |
| CBS 128556 | Fragaria × ananassa, fruit rot | New Zealand | JQ948804 | JQ950124 | |
| CBS 128557 | Fragaria × ananassa, fruit rot | New Zealand | JQ948805 | JQ950125 | |
| IMI 345581 | Fragaria × ananassa, lesion | New Zealand | JQ948806 | JQ950126 | |
| C. simmondsii | CBS 122122* | Carica papaya, fruit | Australia | JQ948606 | JQ949927 |
| CBS 295.67 | Fragaria sp., fruit | Australia | JQ948608 | JQ949929 | |
| IMI 345034 | Fragaria × ananassa, fruit | Australia | JQ948609 | JQ949930 | |
Colletotrichum spp. associated with strawberry anthracnose used in multi-gene analysis in this study, host/substrate, and country of isolation and GenBank accessions.
1CBS, Culture collection of the Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, Fungal Biodiversity Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands; IMI, Culture collection of CABI Europe UK Center, Egham, UK; CCTU, Culture Collection ofTabrizUniversity.
Ex−typeor Ex−epitypestrains.
Pathogenicity Test on Detached Leaves of Strawberry
To fulfill Koch's postulates, a pathogenicity test on detached untreated leaves of Fragaria × ananassa cv. Elsanta (a susceptible cultivar to strawberry anthracnose). The test was performed to evaluate the pathogenicity of the ten fungal isolates recovered in this study, in comparison to the type strains of C. nymphaeae, C. acutatum sensu stricto, C. godetiae, C. fioriniae, C. salicis, C. simmondsii and C. nymphaeae. Colletotrichum nymphaeae strain Cch32 was used as positive control due to its high aggressiveness on strawberry fruits of Fragaria × ananassa cv. Elsanta in previous study (Karimi et al., 2017). Detached leaves were first surface-sterilized by dipping in 1 % sodium hypochlorite for 30 s and ethanol 70% followed by rinsing three times in sterile distilled water. The leaves were left to dry on sterile paper under a laminar hood before inoculation. Inoculation was carried out according to Saha et al. (2010), with some modifications. Based on the leaf size, four to 12 wounds were initially made on the adaxial surface of each leaf using a sterile sharp needle. For inoculation, a plug of 5 mm of seven-day-old fungal cultures was placed on the wounds of each leaf. After inoculation, leaves were placed in plastic containers with moistened filter papers at 23°C to maintain high relative humidity (>95%). Five detached leaves were inoculated for each fungal strain and pathogen-free PDA plugs were used as control. After 8 days, the severity of anthracnose disease were recorded and calculated for each strawberry leaf using imageJ v. 1.51i software (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/index.html).
Rep-PCR Fingerprinting
A polymorphic analysis based on repetitive-sequence-based PCR (rep-PCR) genomic fingerprinting was carried out for 17 fungal strains in this study using the primers of BOXA1R, REP1R-1/REP2-1, and ERIC1R/ERIC2 (Versalovic et al., 1991, 1994). PCR reactions were repeated twice (independent reactions) to confirm reproducibility of the results. PCR reaction mixtures were prepared in 25 ml volumes as follows: 12.5 μl 1X Dream Taq Green PCR Mastermix (Fer-mentas) 9.5 μl sterile distilled water, 1 μl each of each primer (0.2 μmol/μl stock) and 1 μl of template DNA (50 ng). DNA-free water (nuclease free) was used as a control. The PCR cycles were carried out as follows: an initial denaturation at 96 °C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles at 94°C for 60 s, 40°C (REP primers) or 51°C (ERIC/BOX primers) for 1 min and 65°C for 8 min and a final extension at 65°C for 8 min. An aliquot of 5 μl PCR product of each isolate was loaded onto 1.5 % agarose gel 1 × Tris-Acetate-EDTA (TAE) buffer at 100V for 2.5 h and then stained with ethidium bromide. Amplicons size was determined in comparison to the GeneRulerTM 1kb DNA ladder. Unambiguous bands were scored as “0” and “1” to make a matrix data according to their presence or absence. UPGMA analysis was carried out for each marker using a simple matching coefficient with NTSYS-PC v2.2 and finally a consensus dendrogram was built.
Statistical Analyses
One-way ANOVA was performed to analyze results of pathogenicity test using SAS software package (SAS® software v. 9.1.3 SP4 portable). Least significant difference (LSD) was used to compare the means.
Results
Isolation
Of the various weeds sampled in the strawberry fields, 10 fungal isolates with a colony morphology resembling the one of Colletotrichum were recovered. These isolates were obtained from the leaves of asymptomatic plants of Amaranthus viridis L. (one isolate), Convolvulus arvensis L. (two isolates), Fumaria officinalis L. (two isolates), Lactuca serriola L. (one isolate) and Sonchus oleraceus L. (four isolates).
Morphological Description
Macro morphological features of type strains and isolates recovered from common weeds of strawberry fields are represented in Table 2. All isolates obtained from weeds were morphologically similar to each other and to C. nymphaeae strain CCTUCch32 reported from strawberry (Table 2, Figures 2c,d,g,h,k,l). On the contrary, colony morphology and growth rate of these strains were almost different compared to the type strain of C. nymphaeae (CBS 515.78) (Table 2, Figures 2b–d,f–h,j–l). Other fungal strains of Colletotrichum spp. in this study shared some similar characteristics (colony morphology and growth rate) compared to isolates recovered from weeds in this study (Table 2, Figures 1, 2).
Table 2
| Fungal strains | PDA | MEA | OA | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD (mm) | CM | CD (mm) | CM | CD (mm) | CM | |
| C. acutatum (CBS 112996)* | 55 | R, C, Wa, P | 54 | R, C, Wa, P, S | 59 | R, C, Wa, P, S |
| C. fioriniae (CBS 128517)* | 45 | IR, L, Wa, W (m) to B (c) | 59 | R, C, Wa, W to G | 65 | R, C, Wa, W to G |
| C. godetiae (CBS 133.44)* | 55 | R, C, Wa, W to P | 51 | R, C, Wa, W to P, S | 59 | R, C, Wa, S |
| C. nymphaeae (CBS 515.78)* | 31 | R, C, Wa, G (c) to W (m) | 30 | R, C, Wa, G, S | 35 | R, C, Wa, G, S |
| C. nymphaeae CCTUCch32** | 53 | R, C, Wa, W to P | 50 | R, C, Wa, W to P | 64 | R, C, Wa, W to G |
| C. nymphaeae CCTUST1 | 54 | R, C, Wa, W to G | 53 | R, C, Wa, W to G | 63 | R, C, Wa, W to G |
| C. nymphaeae CCTUST2 | 55 | R, C, Wa, W to G | 53 | R, C, Wa, W to G | 60 | R, C, Wa, W to G |
| C. nymphaeae CCTUST3 | 54 | R, C, Wa, W to G | 52 | R, C, Wa, W to G | 62 | R, C, Wa, W to G |
| C. nymphaeae CCTUST4 | 54 | R, C, Wa, W to G | 53 | R, C, Wa, W to G | 61 | R, C, Wa, W to G |
| C. nymphaeae CCTUSh1 | 56 | R, C, Wa, W to G | 53 | R, C, Wa, W to G | 63 | R, C, Wa, W to G |
| C. nymphaeae CCTUSh2 | 59 | R, C, Wa, W to G | 53 | R, C, Wa, W to G | 63 | R, C, Wa, W to G |
| C. nymphaeae CCTUK | 56 | R, C, Wa, W to G | 53 | R, C, Wa, W to G | 62 | R, C, Wa, W to G |
| C. nymphaeae CCTUT | 50 | R, C, Wa, W to G | 55 | R, C, Wa, W to G | 62 | R, C, Wa, W to G |
| C. nymphaeae CCTUP1 | 52 | R, C, Wa, W to G | 52 | R, C, Wa, W to G | 60 | R, C, Wa, W to G |
| C. nymphaeae CCTUP2 | 55 | R, C, Wa, W to G | 53 | R, C, Wa, W to G | 60 | R, C, Wa, W to G |
| C. salicis (CBS 607.94)* | 62 | R, C, Wa, P | 62 | R, C, Wa, P | 59 | R, C, Wa, W to G |
| C. simmondsii (CBS 122122)* | 28 | R, C, Wa, G (c) to W (m) | 26 | R, C, Wa, G (c) to W (m) | 26 | R, C, Wa, G (c) to W (m) |
Colony morphology and morphometry of fungal strains recovered from weeds and type strains belonging to C. acutatum complex.
Ex-type and ex-epitype strain,
fungal strain obtained from strawberry. (c), center; C, circular; CD, colony diameter (average), CM, colony morphology; G, gray; L, lobate; (m), margin; P, pink; IR, irregular; R, regular, S, sector; W, white, Wa, without aerial mycelium.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Phylogenetic Analysis
The final aligned TUB and GADPH datasets contained 74 in-group taxa with a total of 757 (gene boundaries, GAPDH: 1–265, TUB: 266–757) characteristics containing 109 and 94 unique site patterns, respectively. MrModeltest v. 2.3 found GTR+G+I to be the most fitting replacement models for both concatenated datasets. Bayesian inference of both concatenated datasets placed all the isolates sequenced in this study in the C. nymphaeae clade with the highest posterior probability (Figure 3). The C. nymphaeae clade with high posterior probability contained five subclades. All the isolates generated in this study were placed in subclade S5 containing the strains reported from strawberry plants besides one isolate from Mahonia sp. in Italy.
Figure 3
Pathogenicity Test
Pathogenicity test revealed that all isolates obtained from weeds in this study and other type strains of Colletotrichum spp. were able to induce anthracnose symptoms on strawberry leaves of Fragaria × ananassa cv. Elsanta (Figures 1, 2). However, there was a significant difference between fungal strains in terms of disease severity (df = 17, F = 6.95, p = < 0.0001). Colletotrichum nymphaeae CCTUSh1 showed the highest pathogenicity, although it had no significant difference with most strains such as the type strains of C. acutatum, C. salicis and C. fioriniae (Figures 1, 2, 4). The type strain of C. nymphaeae had significantly the lowest virulence compared to other C. nymphaeae strains in this study besides C. nymphaeae CCTUK (Figure 4). Moreover, C. nymphaeae strain CCTUCch32 after four strains of CCTUSh1, CCTUST3, CCTUT, and CCTUP1 had the highest pathogenicity compared to others (Figure 4). Type strains of C. godetiae and C. simmondsii showed the lowest pathogenicity and had no significant difference with healthy control (Figure 4).
Figure 4
Repetitive-Sequence-Based PCR
No amplification was observed for primer set REP1R-1/REP2-1 based on repetitive-sequence-based PCR analysis after several attempts while two primer sets, BOXA1R and ERIC1R/ERIC2, amplified the genomic DNA with reproducible DNA fingerprints (Figure 5). The size of amplified amplicons for each primer set ranged from 400 to 5,000 bp and from 200 to 6,000 bp, respectively (Figure 5). UPGMA clustering analysis of individual and combined data matrix generated with the amplicon patterns of BOXA1R and ERIC1R/ERIC2 placed all strains of this study at level of species showing the efficacy of these primers to generate species-specific DNA fingerprints even in the case of cryptic species (Figures 6–8). Individual and consensus dendrograms resided the type strain of C. nymphaeae as subclade compared to other C. nymphaeae strains obtained from weed plants and strawberry (Figures 6–8).
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Discussion
This study confirmed the hypothesis that weeds present in strawberry fields can host C. nymphaeae as a potential inoculum reservoir. The characterization of the Colletotrichum isolates recovered from the common weeds across the strawberry fields in Iran, indicates that weed isolates shared similar macro morphological characteristics (Table 2, Figure 2) and were identical to C. nymphaeae CCTUCch32 isolated from symptomatic strawberry (Karimi et al., 2017). On the other hand, in terms of colony features and growth rate, the 10 isolates showed some discrepancies with type strain of C. nymphaeae from Nymphaea alba (Table 2, Figures 1, 2). Moreover, they shared some features with other type strains including C. acutatum, C. salicis, C. simmondsii, C. fioriniae and C. godetiae (Table 2, Figures 1, 2), indicating the variability and unreliability of macro-morphological characterization for species delimitation. However, Bayesian inference of concatenated alignments of TUB and GAPDH clustered our isolates in C. nymphaeae clade inside subclade 5, containing other C. nymphaeae strains reported from strawberry worldwide including Iran such as C. nymphaeae FN3, FS8, SN1, and SN2 (Karimi et al., 2017). Both TUB and GAPDH genes have been recommended as appropriate barcode genes to reveal cryptic species of C. acutatum complex (Damm et al., 2012a). Base on that, using a combination of molecular and morphological characterizations, the 10 Colletotrichum sp. isolates from symptomless plants of A. viridis, C. arvensis, F. officinalis, L serriola, and S. oleraceus were identified as C. nymphaeae (Figures 2, 3). This result was also in line with multi-gene and fingerprinting analyses where type strains of C. nymphaeae resided in a different subclade (Figures 3, 6–8). Furthermore, in the pathogenicity test, type strain of C. nymphaeae showed the lowest virulence on strawberry leaves compared to other C. nymphaea strains, except for C. nymphaeae CCTUK (Figure 3). Overall, these results further confirm our previous findings (Karimi et al., 2017) that subclade 5 containing strains recovered from strawberry are evolutionary different and constitute a distinct subpopulation of C. nymphaeae with host-preference on strawberry. Moreover, this variability in the aggressiveness of a species within C. acutatum complex could be associated with the capability of different populations of these species to infect a wider range of hosts and the susceptibility to various environmental conditions (Baroncelli et al., 2015).
Molecular typing based on rep-PCR revealed that this technique can generate species-specific DNA fingerprints, at least for Colletotrichum spp. causing strawberry anthracnose belonging to C. acutatum complex (Figures 5–8). It is worth noting that dendrograms resulted from BOX, REP1R-1/REP2-1 and their combination showed high similarity with multi-gene tree generated with both TUB and GAPDH genes particularly one resulted from BOX (Figures 3, 6–8). Accordingly, amplified patterns generated by rep-PCR fingerprinting analysis revealed that all isolates recovered from weeds were highly similar to C. nymphaeae CCTUCch32 isolated from strawberry, while they showed some discrepancies with the type strain of C. nymphaeae (Figure 5). Similarly to multi-gene analysis, the type strain of C. nymphaeae resides in a distinct subclade (Figures 6–8). Based on the dendrograms of this study, rep-PCR confirmed to be an appropriate molecular marker to reveal intra and inter species variation of Colletotrichum spp. causing anthracnose on strawberry. It seems that this molecular technique can reveal all cryptic species among C. acutatum sensu lato, however to further confirm this hypothesis, more type and epi-type fungal strains belong to C. acutatum sensu lato should be investigated. Although rep-PCR fingerprinting analysis has been originally used for molecular typing and identification of bacterial species (Versalovic et al., 1991, 1994), the efficacy of this molecular typing technique in unveiling of fungal cryptic species belonging to various fungal complex species was shown in some studies (Alves et al., 2007; Faedda et al., 2011). However, this is the first time that rep-PCR is used as authentic molecular typing technique for unveiling Colletorichum spp. causing strawberry anthracnose belonging to the C. acutatum sensu lato. This result is consistent with a previous study (Faedda et al., 2011) where dendrograms obtained with RAPD-PCR analysis, a molecular technique very similar to Rep-PCR (Gillings and Holley, 1997), were showed to be almost identical, and even more informative of intraspecific variability, compared to ITS- and TUB-based UPGMA phylogetic trees of isolates of the C. acutatum species complex from various host plants, including strawberry.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that asymptomatic plants of A. viridis, C. arvensis, F. officinalis, L. serriola, and S. oleraceus are reported as possible inoculum reservoirs of C. nymphaeae. In this study, fungal isolates were isolated using the protocol which is commonly used for the isolation of endophytic fungi, highlighting their either endophytic or long lasting biotrophic nature inside those plants. A broad diversity of approaches including biotrophs, nectrotrophs, hemibiotrophs to endophytes are employed by Colletotrichum species to colonize and obtain nutrients from their hosts (Baroncelli et al., 2017). Previously, only asymptomatic plants of the weed genera Vicia and Conyza were reported as inoculum reservoirs of C. acutatum sensu lato (Freeman et al., 2001) and the pathogenicity of C. acutatum sensu lato was demonstrated on some other weeds in strawberry fields in UK, including Malva sylvestris, Ranunchulus repens, Sinapis arvensis, Rumex obtusifolius, Geranium dissectum, Polygonatum aviculare, and Plantago lanceolata (Berrie and Burgess, 2003). It is noteworthy that the aggressiveness of four C. nymphaeae strains recovered from weeds including C. nymphaeae CCTUSh1, CCTUST3, CCTUT, and CCTUP2 was higher than C. nymphaeae CCTUCch32, which was the most aggressive strain in our previous studies (Karimi et al., 2017). These findings highlight that the infected weeds close to strawberry fields can possibly act as a potential reservoirs of pathogen inoculum during crop season, as highlighted by Berrie and Burgess (2003). In view of the fact that no specific resting structure, which can let it to survive in buried plant residues, has so far been reported for C. acutatum sensu lato (Ureña-Padilla et al., 2001; Freeman, 2008), weed plants identified in this study could allow/contribute to the survival of the pathogen between seasons. Therefore, the removal of weeds that could act as potential pathogen reservoirs should be considered to optimize disease management.
Conclusion
The presence of this pathogen on common weeds growing close to or within strawberry fields indicates that they may serve as a reservoir of inoculum and calls for further practical investigations to assess the advantage of their removal to reduce pathogen inoculum and improve the efficacy of anthracnose disease control on strawberry. Moreover, our study demonstrates that, when the type strains of each species are available, rep-PCR is able to reveal intra and inter species variation of fungal species belonging to the C. acutatum complex, even in case of cryptic species.
Statements
Author contributions
KK designed and performed the experiments, analyzed and discussed the results, and wrote the manuscript. MA and IP discussed the results and wrote the manuscript.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Iran National Science Foundation (INSF) and the University of Tabriz for the grant for the post-doc to KK. The research reported here is also partially funded by the Autonomous Province of Trento.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00129/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AlvesA.PhillipsA. J.HenriquesI.CorreiaA. (2007). Rapid differentiation of species of Botryosphaeriaceae by PCR fingerprinting. Res. Microbiol.158, 112–121. 10.1016/j.resmic.2006.10.003
2
ArzanlouM.BakhshiM.KarimiK.TorbatiM. (2015). Multigene phylogeny reveals three new records of Colletotrichum spp. and several new host records for the mycobiota of IranJ. Plant Prot. Res. 55, 198–211. 10.1515/jppr-2015-0027
3
BaroncelliR.TalhinhasP.PensecF.SuknoS. A.Le FlochG.ThonM. R. (2017). The Colletotrichum acutatum species complex as a model system to study evolution and host specialization in plant pathogens. Front. Microbiol. 8:2001. 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02001
4
BaroncelliR.ZapparataA.SarroccoS.SuknoS. A.LaneC. R.ThonM. R.et al. (2015). Molecular diversity of anthracnose pathogen populations associated with UK strawberry production suggests multiple introductions of three different Colletotrichum species. PLOS ONE10:e0129140. 10.1371/journal.pone.0129140
5
BerrieA. M.BurgessC. M. (2003). A review of research on epidemiology and control of blackspot of strawberry (Colletotrichum acutatum) with special reference to weeds as alternative hosts. IOBC/wrps Bull. 26, 163–168.
6
DammU.CannonP. F.LiuF.BarretoR. W.GuatimosimE.CrousP. W. (2013). The Colletotrichum orbiculare species complex: important pathogens of field crops and weeds. Fungal. Divers. 61, 29–59. 10.1007/s13225-013-0255-4
7
DammU.CannonP. F.WoudenbergJ. H.CrousP. W. (2012a). The Colletotrichum acutatum species complex. Stud. Mycol. 73, 37–113. 10.3114/sim0010
8
DammU.CannonP. F.WoudenbergJ. H.JohnstonP. R.WeirB. S.TanY. P.et al. (2012b). The Colletotrichum boninense species complex. Stud. Mycol. 73, 1–36. 10.3114/sim0002
9
DammU.O'ConnellR. J.GroenewaldJ. Z.CrousP. W. (2014). The Colletotrichum destructivum species complex–hemibiotrophic pathogens of forage and field crops. Stud. Mycol. 79, 49–84. 10.1016/j.simyco.2014.09.003
10
DammU.WoudenbergJ. H.CannonP. F.CrousP. W. (2009). Colletotrichum species with curved conidia from herbaceous hosts. Fungal. Divers. 18, 39–45.
11
DeanR.Van KanJ. A.PretoriusZ. A.Hammond-KosackK. E.Di PietroA.SpanuP. D.et al. (2012). The Top 10 fungal pathogens in molecular plant pathology. Mol. plant pathol. 13, 414–430. 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2011.00783.x
12
EdgarR. C. (2004). MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic. Acids. Res. 32, 1792–1797. 10.1093/nar/gkh340
13
FaeddaR.AgosteoG. E.SchenaL.MoscaS.FrisulloS.Di San LioG. M.et al. (2011). Colletotrichum clavatum sp. nov. identified as the causal agent of olive anthracnose in Italy. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 50, 283–302. Available online at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26458702
14
FreemanS. (2008). Management, survival strategies, and host range of Colletotrichum acutatum on strawberry. Hortscience43, 66–68.
15
FreemanS.HorowitzS.SharonA. (2001). Pathogenic and nonpathogenic lifestyles in Colletotrichum acutatum from strawberry and other plants. Phytopathol91, 986–992. 10.1094/PHYTO.2001.91.10.986
16
FreemanS.KatanT. (1997). Identification of Colletotrichum species responsible for anthracnose and root necrosis of strawberry in Israel. Phytopathol87, 516–521. 10.1094/PHYTO.1997.87.5.516
17
GillingsM.HolleyM. (1997). Repetitive element PCR fingerprinting (rep-PCR) using enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus (ERIC) primers is not necessarily directed at ERIC elements. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 25, 17–21. 10.1046/j.1472-765X.1997.00162.x
18
GlassN. L.DonaldsonG. (1995). Development of primer sets designed for use with PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous ascomycetes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61, 1323–1330.
19
GodoyP.CanoJ.GenéJ.GuarroJ.Höfling-LimaA. L.Lopes ColomboA. (2004). Genotyping of 44 isolates of Fusarium solani, the main agent of fungal keratitis in Brazil. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42, 4494–4497. 10.1128/JCM.42.10.4494-4497.2004
20
GuerberJ. C.LiuB.CorrellJ. C.JohnstonP. R. (2003). Characterization of diversity in Colletotrichum acutatum sensu lato by sequence analysis of two gene introns, mtDNA and intron RFLPs, and mating compatibility. Mycologia95, 872–895. 10.1080/15572536.2004.11833047
21
HowardC. M.MaasJ. L.ChandlerC. K.AfbregtsE. E. (1992). Anthracnose of strawberry caused by the Colletotrichum complex in Florida. Plant Dis. 76, 976–981. 10.1094/PD-76-0976
22
KarimiK.AhariA. B.ArzanlouM.AminiJ.PertotI.Rota-StabelliO. (2017). Application of the consolidated species concept to identify the causal agent of strawberry anthracnose in Iran and initial molecular dating of the Colletotrichum acutatum species complex. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 147, 375–387. 10.1007/s10658-016-1009-4
23
KarimiK.KhodaeiS.Rota-StabelliO.ArzanlouM.PertotI. (2016). Identification and characterization of two new fungal pathogens of Polygonatum odoratum (Angular Solomon's seal) in Italy. J. Phytopathol. 164, 1075–1084. 10.1111/jph.12528
24
LiuF.CaiL.CrousP. W.DammU. (2014). The Colletotrichum gigasporum species complex. Persoonia33, 83–97. 10.3767/003158514X684447
25
LiuM.ZhangW.ZhouY.LiuY.YanJ. Y.LiX. H.et al. (2016). First report of twig anthracnose on grapevine caused by Colletotrichum nymphaeae in China. Plant Dis. 100, 2530–2530. 10.1094/PDIS-05-16-0632-PDN
26
MaddisonW. P.MaddisonD. R. (2018). Mesquite: a Molecular System for Evolutionary Analysis. version 3.40. Available online at: http://mesquiteproject.org
27
MehtaY. R.MehtaA.RosatoY. B. (2002). ERIC and REP-PCR banding patterns and sequence analysis of the internal transcribed spacer of rDNA of Stemphylium solani isolates from cotton. Curr. Microbiol. 44, 323–328. 10.1007/s00284-001-0026-4
28
NasehiA.KadirJ.RashidT. S.AwlaH. K.GolkhandanE.MahmodiF. (2016). Occurrence of anthracnose fruit rot caused by Colletotrichum nymphaeae on pepper (Capsicum annuum) in Malaysia. Plant Dis. 100, 1244–1244. 10.1094/PDIS-08-15-0876-PDN
29
NylanderJ. A. A. (2004). MrModeltest v2. Program Distributed by the Author. Sweden: Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University.
30
O'DonnellK.CigelnikE. (1997). Two divergent intragenomic rDNA ITS2 types within a monophyletic lineage of the fungus Fusarium are non orthologous. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 7, 103–116.
31
RambautA. (2009). FigTree v1.3.1. Available online at: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/
32
RaynerR. W. (1970). A Mycological Colour Chart.Kew, UK: Commonwealth Mycological Institute.
33
RonquistF.HuelsenbeckJ. P. (2003). MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics19, 1572–1574. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180
34
SahaA.IshaM.DasguptaS.SahaD. (2010). Pathogenicity of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides (Penz.) Sacc. causal agent of anthracnose in different varieties of eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) determined by levels of cross-reactive antigens shared by host and pathogen. Arch. Phytopathology. Plant Protect. 43, 1781–1795. 10.1080/03235400902753667
35
SmithB. J. (2013). Strawberry anthracnose: progress toward control through science. Int. J. Fruit Sci. 13, 91–102. 10.1080/15538362.2012.697025
36
StadenR. (1996). The staden sequence analysis package. Mol. Biotech. 5:233. 10.1007/BF02900361
37
TamuraK.StecherG.PetersonD.FilipskiA.KumarS. (2013). MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 2725–2729. 10.1093/molbev/mst197
38
Ureña-PadillaA. R.MitchellD. J.LegardD. E. (2001). Oversummer survival of inoculum for Colletotrichum crown rot in buried strawberry crown tissue. Plant Dis. 85, 750–754. 10.1094/PDIS.2001.85.7.750
39
VelhoA. C.StadnikM. J.CasanovaL.MondinoP.AlanizS. (2014). First report of Colletotrichum nymphaeae causing apple bitter rot in southern Brazil. Plant Dis. Note. 98:567. 10.1094/PDIS-06-13-0671-PDN
40
VersalovicJ.KoeuthT.LupskiJ. R. (1991). Distribution of repetitive DNA sequences in eubacteria and application to fingerprinting of bacterial genomes. Nucleic. Acid. Res. 19, 6823–6831. 10.1093/nar/19.24.6823
41
VersalovicJ.SchneiderM.de BruijnF. J.LupskiJ. R. (1994). Genomic fingerprinting of bacteria using repetitive sequence based polymerase chain reaction. Methods. Mol. Cell. Biol.5, 25–40.
42
WeirB. S.JohnstonP. R.DammU. (2012). The Colletotrichum gloeosporioides species complex. Stud. Mycol. 73, 115–180. 10.3114/sim0011
43
YamagishiN.FujinagaM.IshiyamaY.OgisoH.SatoT.TosaY. (2015). Life cycle and control of Colletotrichum nymphaeae, the causal agent of celery stunt anthracnose. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 81, 279–286. 10.1007/s10327-015-0598-7
Summary
Keywords
Fragaria × ananassa, anthracnose, asymptomatic plants, inoculum reservoir, molecular identification, kurdistan province
Citation
Karimi K, Arzanlou M and Pertot I (2019) Weeds as Potential Inoculum Reservoir for Colletotrichum nymphaeae Causing Strawberry Anthracnose in Iran and Rep-PCR Fingerprinting as Useful Marker to Differentiate C. acutatum Complex on Strawberry. Front. Microbiol. 10:129. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00129
Received
11 April 2018
Accepted
21 January 2019
Published
12 February 2019
Volume
10 - 2019
Edited by
Gustavo Henrique Goldman, University of São Paulo, Brazil
Reviewed by
Soner Soylu, Mustafa Kemal University, Turkey; Santa Olga Cacciola, Università degli Studi di Catania, Italy
Updates
Copyright
© 2019 Karimi, Arzanlou and Pertot.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Kaivan Karimi Keivankarimi@tabrizu.ac.ir; Kaivan.karimi@guests.fmach.it
This article was submitted to Fungi and Their Interactions, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.