Abstract
Mosses are ecologically important plants also used for greening, gardening, and decorative purposes. Knowledge of the microbial flora associated with mosses is expected to be important for control and preservation of global and local environments. However, the moss-associated microbial flora is often poorly known. Moss-associated fungi and bacteria may promote plant growth and pest control, but they may be alternative hosts for pathogens of vascular plants. In this study, the fungus Sclerotinia delphinii was identified for the first time as a pathogen that causes severe damage to Sunagoke moss (Racomitrium japonicum). This moss is used for greening roofs and walls of buildings in urban environments owing to its notable tolerance of environmental stresses. Inoculation with the S. delphinii strain SR1 of the mono- and dicotyledonous seed plants Hordeum vulgare, Brassica rapa var. pekinensis, Lactuca sativa, and Spinacia oleracea, in addition to the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha and the moss Physcomitrella patens, showed that the fungus has a wide host range. Colonization with SR1 progressed more rapidly in non-vascular than in vascular plant species. Studies with P. patens under controlled conditions showed that SR1 secreted a fluid during colonization. Treatment with the secretion induced production of reactive oxygen species in the moss. Endogenous peroxidase partially inhibited SR1 colonization of P. patens. A bacterial isolate, most likely Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, that coexists with R. japonicum was antagonistic to SR1 growth. Taken together, the present results suggest that fungal colonization of mosses may be prevented by a peroxidase secreted by the moss and an antagonistic bacterium coexisting in the moss habitat. The findings suggest that there is potential to apply biological control measures for protection of mosses against fungal pathogens.
Introduction
Sunagoke moss (Racomitrium japonicum Dozy & Molk.; Grimmiaceae) has been used for greening of roofs and walls of buildings in an urban environment (Supplementary Figure S1). Given the notable tolerance of this species to environmental stresses, such as high temperature, drought, and nutrient limitation, plants can be maintained without irrigation and fertilization for several years. The use of Sunagoke moss for greening has been studied previously (Ushada et al., 2007; Hendrawan and Murase, 2011). The most important trait that promotes selection of this moss as material for covering buildings is its impressive “light moss-green” color when the colony is maintained under appropriate conditions. Therefore, it is important to establish techniques to maintain the moss colony in good health for as long as possible. Moss health and quality can be impaired by inadequate management, excessive watering, and/or attack by plant pathogens. In particular, this moss is occasionally attacked by pathogenic fungi, which cause severe deterioration in moss quality. In the present study, we describe a devastating disease of Sunagoke moss caused by a fungus and discuss possibilities to control the disease.
Bryophytes provide an important habitat for diverse groups of microorganisms. Therefore, moss–microbe interactions have been studied from ecological and biological perspectives (Hoshino et al., 2001; Davey and Currah, 2006; Davey et al., 2009a,b, 2010; Huhtinen et al., 2010; Stenroos et al., 2010). We previously highlighted that R. japonicum colonies used for greening can be attacked by several fungi (Akita et al., 2011), including pathogens of seed plants (Lehtonen et al., 2012b). Hence, mosses may be alternative hosts of fungi pathogenic to seed plants, which justifies further study from the point-of-view of pest control in agriculture. In addition, from a physiological perspective, mosses have been suggested to be good model systems for the study of plant responses during pathogenesis, because they may have pathogen recognition and signal transduction systems similar to those of vascular plants. Several pathogens of vascular plants, such as the bacteria Erwinia spp. (Andersson et al., 2005; de Leon et al., 2007; de Leon and Montesano, 2013; Machado et al., 2015; Alvarez et al., 2016) and fungi belonging to the oomycete Pythium (Oliver et al., 2009; Takikawa et al., 2015; Castro et al., 2016) and Botrytis (de Leon et al., 2012; Castro et al., 2016), cause disease symptoms and expression of disease-associated genes that encode pathogenesis-related proteins when artificially inoculated to the moss P. patens (Hedw.) Bruch & Schimp. (Castro et al., 2016). Involvement of signal transduction through the MAPK cascade has been demonstrated following application of chitosan, an elicitor of pathogen defense responses, to P. patens (Bressendorff et al., 2016).
In our previous study, the majority of pathogenic fungi isolated from R. japonicum (Akita et al., 2011) were considered to be opportunistic pathogens that usually cause relatively mild symptoms. However, more recently, we detected a fungus that causes development of devastating symptoms in the moss colonies (Figure 1A). Infected plants are bleached and the fungus produces sclerotia (Figure 1B). In the present study, we observed the pathogenesis of this fungus, determined as Sclerotium delphinii Welch, on several mosses, including P. patens, the liverwort M. polymorpha L., and seed plants. It is the first report that S. delphinii can infect bryophytes and liverworts. Sclerotium species include oxalate-secreting and reactive oxygen species (ROS) generating fungi for which plant oxalate metabolism may be involved in symptom development (Kim et al., 2008; Williams et al., 2011). In the current study, we demonstrate that ROS can be induced in a moss by fungal secretion. We show the involvement of peroxidase in partial inhibition of fungal colonization and propose a possible approach to protect mosses from fungal pathogens by application of a moss-associated bacterium. Given that moss habitats are promising sources of microorganisms beneficial to vascular plants, such as antagonists of pathogenic fungi (Shcherbakov et al., 2013), the present results indicate the importance of maintaining habitats of mosses and the associated beneficial microorganisms.
FIGURE 1
Materials and Methods
Isolation and Culture of Fungi
Fungal sclerotia (ca. 2 mm diameter, see Figure 1B) were collected from a symptomatic colony of R. japonicum and sterilized with sodium hypochlorite solution (8.5 to 13.5% active chlorine; Nakalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan) diluted 10-fold [0.05% (w/w) Tween 20] for 2 min, followed by five rinses with sterilized water. Sclerotia were cultured on potato dextrose agar (PDA) in Petri dishes under continuous light-emitting diode (LED) illumination (mixture of white and red) of ca. 80 μmol m-2 s-1 at 23°C. The hyphae that developed from a sclerotium were selected and subcultured to establish a single fungal isolate, SR1, used for further study. The fungus was maintained on PDA medium (Nissui Pharmaceutical, Tokyo, Japan) or potato sucrose agar (PSA) containing 3.9 g L-1 potato extract (Formedium, Hunstanton, United Kingdom), 21 g L-1 sucrose and 14.1 g L-1 agar under continuous light and the conditions described above.
Plant Materials
In our previous study, the peroxidase-encoding gene Prx34 was knocked out in P. patens (Lehtonen et al., 2009). The wild type and a Prx34-deficient strain of P. patens (Prx34-KO) were aseptically used. An aseptic culture of M. polymorpha was kindly provided by Dr. K. T. Yamato, Kindai University, Wakayama, Japan. Gametophytes of the mosses R. japonicum and Hypnum plumaeforme Wilson were collected from the campus of the Faculty of Biology-Oriented Science and Technology, Kindai University, Wakayama, Japan. The collected gametophytes were washed in tap water for 60 min prior to use. Seeds of cultivated dicotyledonous plants, comprising Hordeum vulgare L., Brassica rapa L. var. pekinensis (Lour.) Kitam., L. sativa L., and S. oleracea L., were purchased from a local market and surface-sterilized with sodium hypochlorite for 10 min, followed by three rinses with sterilized water. The seeds were germinated in autoclaved Plant Boxes (60 mm × 60 mm × 100 mm; AGC Techno Glass, Shizuoka, Japan) filled with vermiculite (depth 3 cm) (size 3–6 mm, Komeri, Niigata) and 55 mL of commercial liquid fertilizer (Hyponex 6-10-5, Hyponex Japan, Osaka, Japan) diluted 1000-fold. Plants were cultured under continuous LED illumination (mixture of white and red) of ca. 80 μmol m-2 s-1 at 23°C.
Culture Conditions for P. patens
Protonemata of P. patens were cultured on BCD plate medium (1 mM MgSO4, 1.85 mM KH2PO4, 10 mM KNO3, 45 mM FeSO4, 1 mM CaCl2, 0.22 mM CuSO4, 0.19 mM ZnSO4, 10 mM H3BO4, 0.10 mM Na2MoO4, 2 mM MnCl2, 0.23 mM CoCl2, and 0.17 mM KI, solidified with 8 g L-1 agar) supplemented with 5 mM ammonium tartrate1. Protonemata (ca. 1 g) were homogenized 30 s in 15 mL of sterilized soft agar (1.5 g L-1 in water) using a handy homogenizer (Polytron PT1200E, Kinematica, Luzern) for subculturing. A cellophane sheet (No. 300, Rengo, Osaka) was put on the medium and 3 mL of the homogenate was poured on the plate and subcultured every 2 weeks. In vitro gametophytes of P. patens were developed on BCD plate medium by culture for 3 weeks under continuous illumination from a cold cathode fluorescent lamp with ca. 80 μmol m-2 s-1 at 23°C.
Fungus Identification
Genomic DNA was extracted from fungal hyphae grown in aseptic culture. Hyphae were frozen in liquid nitrogen, ground in a mortar, and the powder was suspended in 300 μL lysis buffer (100 mM Tris–Hc1, pH 7.5, SDS 0.5% w/v, 30 mM EDTA) and boiled for 7 min. Subsequently, 150 μL of 3 M sodium acetate was added, followed by incubation at -30°C in a freezer for 7 min. After centrifugation at 13,000 ×g for 5 min, the supernatant was extracted with an equal volume of phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (1:1:1, v/v/v) and washed with chloroform, 2-propanol, 70% (v/v) ethanol and then desiccated. Finally, the purified DNA was suspended in TE (10:1) buffer. The rDNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region, including ITS1 and ITS2, was amplified by PCR for sequencing using KOD FX Neo polymerase (TOYOBO, Osaka, Japan) in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol. The primers NSI1 (5′-GATTGAATGGCTTAGTGAG-3′) and NLB4 (5′-GGATTCTCACCCTCTATGA-3′) (Martin and Rygiewicz, 2005) were used. PCR products were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis, extracted from the gel using the QIAEX® II Gel Extraction Kit (QIAGEN, Velo, Netherlands) and sequenced by SigmaGenosys (Sigma-Aldrich Japan, Tokyo, Japan).
Pathogenicity Test on Non-vascular and Vascular Plants
Pathogenicity of the isolated fungus on R. japonicum was tested in Petri dishes (diameter 8.5 cm, height 4 cm) containing 15 g vermiculite and 40 mL of 1000-fold diluted commercial liquid fertilizer (Hyponex 6-10-5). The Petri dishes were autoclaved, the gametophytes were transferred onto the vermiculite, then the Petri dishes were packed into a transparent plastic box (10 cm × 20 cm × 6 cm). To test the pathogenicity on non-vascular plants, gametophytes of H. plumaeforme and P. patens, and thalli of M. polymorpha were transferred to autoclaved Plant Boxes (60 mm × 60 mm × 100 mm) containing vermiculite (depth 3 cm) and 55 mL BCD medium. Fungal hyphae cultured for 2 weeks on PDA plates were cut into ca. 0.5 cm2 pieces and placed on the vermiculite at a minimum distance of 1.5 cm from the plants. All Petri dishes and Plant Boxes were incubated under continuous LED illumination of ca. 80 μmol m-2 s-1 at 23°C.
Pathogenicity Tests on P. patens
To test the pathogenicity of the fungal isolate against the protonema of P. patens, a sclerotium was placed directly on protonemata that had been cultured on BCD medium in a 9 cm Petri dish for about 1 week. To test pathogenicity against the gametophyte of the WT and Prx-KO mutant of P. patens, explants were collected from colonies cultured on BCD medium for 3 weeks. Eight gametophytes per plate were concentrically inoculated, each 1.5 cm from the center of the plate, on BCD medium in a 9 cm Petri dish and the sclerotium was placed at the center of the dish. For the pathogenicity test using the gametophyte colonies, six gametophytes were concentrically placed with each 2.0 cm apart from the center on BCD medium in a 9 cm Petri dish and cultured for 3 weeks. A sclerotium was then placed at the center of the dish. All experiments were carried out under continuous light conditions using a cold cathode fluorescent lamp with light intensity of about 80 μmol m-2 s-1 at 23°C.
Detection of ROS
A cuvette (12 i.d. × 55 mm) was filled with 895 μL of 50 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.0) and a sheet of 1 cm2 of the protonemata directly cut from the 2 weeks old culture plate. After incubation for 30 min in the dark at room temperature, 5 μL of 1 mM 2-methyl-6-(4-methoxyphenyl)-3,7–dihydroimidazo(1,2-a)pyrazin-3-one hydrochloride (MCLA; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, United States) and secreted material (100 μL) directly collected by careful pipetting from the fungus was added. Measurement with a luminescence meter (Gene Light GL-200, Microtec, Chiba, Japan) was started immediately. The measurement time was set to 5 s.
Simultaneous Inoculation With the Fungus and Its Antagonist
The antagonistic bacterial strain R-1 (Supplementary Figure S2) was found by chance in a study for isolating fungi coexisting with moss colonies. The 16S rDNA sequence of R-1 (NCBI accession no. AB847954) showed extremely high similarity to that of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (99% identity). The bacterium was cultured in LB medium for 19 h at 28°C, collected by centrifugation at 13,000 ×g for 10 min, and resuspended in 10-fold diluted BCD medium at OD600 = 0.1. An aliquot (5 μL) of the suspension was inoculated onto gametophytes of P. patens cultured on BCD plates, which were cultured under continuous light (ca. 80 μmol m-2 s-1) at 23°C for 1 week. Pure-cultured sclerotia (2 mm in diameter) were set 1.5 cm from single gametophytes or 2 cm from the colony of gametophytes as described in the preceding sections.
Results
Racomitrium japonicum Is Severely Damaged by Sclerotium delphinii
Hyphae of the fungal isolate SR1 grew well on PDA and PSA plates, and white or slightly brown sclerotia formed 3 weeks after inoculation (Figure 2A). Microscopic observations showed that the hyphae had clamp connections (Figure 2B). After inoculation of R. japonicum with the pure-cultured hyphae, the gametophytes were severely damaged and sclerotia developed (Figure 3). This result indicated that the fungal isolate, SR1, is a destructive pathogen of R. japonicum. The ITS sequence (LC374375) of SR1 was 100% identical with that of S. delphinii strain CBS672.71 (JN241578.1), which suggested that SR1 is a strain of S. delphinii (syn. S. rolfsii var. delphinii).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 3
The Fungal Isolate SR1 Has a Wide Host Range, Including Non-vascular and Seed Plants
Colonization of mosses, liverwort and seed plant species by SR1 was observed in plants grown on vermiculite in Petri dishes or Plant Boxes. The hyphae of pure cultures of SR1 placed on vermiculite without plants grew relatively slowly, i.e., 2–3 mm during the 7-day culture period. In contrast, SR1 hyphal growth was visible at 2 days post-inoculation (dpi) when incubated with non-vascular plants, and plants that the hyphae contacted had withered by 4–6 dpi (Figure 4). All mosses and liverworts inoculated, namely R. japonicum, P. patens, H. plumaeforme, and M. polymorpha, were killed by SR1.
FIGURE 4
When incubated with vascular plant seedlings, the SR1 hyphae grew and reached the plants at 8–11 dpi (Figure 5), except for cultures with plants of S. oleracea in which the hyphae grew more slowly. The plant tissues colonized by the hyphae turned brown or white and withering was observed at 11–18 dpi (Figure 5A–D). Unlike the other species, the majority of the hyphae (over 90%) formed sclerotia in the boxes containing S. oleracea, although hyphal growth was minimal (Figure 5E). However, hyphae grew from several pieces of inoculants and, once the hyphae reached S. oleracea plants (less than 10% of inoculants), the plant was covered by the hyphae, became discolored, and wilted within 14 dpi (Figure 5D). The hyphae of SR1 grew in the plant tissues (Supplementary Figure S2) and developed sclerotia. These results indicated that SR1 is a multihost colonizer of bryophytes, liverworts, and seed plants. SR1 also quickly grew on protonemata of P. patens (Figure 6A,B). The protonema cells colonized by hyphae were swollen, and droplets of fluid developed on the hyphae (Figure 6C–F). The droplets of secretory fluid were also observed on the pure-cultured hyphae on the agar plate, especially during development of sclerotia, 1 week after inoculation. Subsequently, the droplets gradually disappeared, except those around the sclerotia (see also Figure 2A).
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 6
SR1 Secretory Fluid Induces ROS
It was difficult to maintain R. japonicum gametophytes under the aseptic culture condition, therefore further analysis was performed using P. patens as a model species. We collected the secretion fluid from SR1 hyphae and examined its effect on ROS generation by P. patens protonemata. The fungal secretion rapidly induced ROS production (Figure 7). Production of ROS can be induced also by chitin or chitosan, which involves the peroxidase Prx34 in P. patens (Lehtonen et al., 2009), and the chitosan-treated Prx34-KO mutant generates only weak ROS signals, as detected by MCLA chemiluminescence (Lehtonen et al., 2012a). In response to application of the SR1 secretory fluid, similar amounts of ROS were detected in wild-type (WT) P. patens and the Prx34-KO mutant (Figure 7).
FIGURE 7
Moss Peroxidase Partially Protects P. patens Against SR1
Physcomitrella patens was inoculated by placement of pure-cultured sclerotia of SR1 at a distance of 1.5 cm from gametophytes of the Prx34-KO mutant and the WT. Hyphal growth was quickly initiated, with hyphae reaching the gametophytes at 3 dpi and quickly covering the plants (Figure 8). The WT plants were totally covered by hyphae by 4–5 dpi. In contrast, the hyphae showed more rapid growth on the Prx34-KO mutant and the gametophytes were totally covered by hyphae by 3–4 dpi.
FIGURE 8
A Bacterium Antagonistic to Fungal Isolate SR1 Coexists With R. japonicum
We previously isolated a bacterium R-1, possibly B. amyloliquefaciens, that shows antagonistic activity against fungi (Supplementary Figure S3). The bacterium R-1 showed antagonistic activity against the fungal isolate SR1 (Figure 9), but inoculation with R-1 showed no influence on P. patens gametophytes (see also Figure 10). When sclerotia were inoculated at 2 cm distance from the colony of the gametophytes, hyphae quickly reached the gametophytes and caused browning on WT plants at 4 dpi (Figure 10), whereas for gametophytes pre-inoculated with R-1, growth of hyphae was distinctly repressed and new sclerotia quickly developed on the inoculated sclerotia. Gametophytes of the Prx34-KO mutant were more quickly damaged by SR1 compared with WT gametophytes, as described above, whereas Prx34-KO gametophytes pre-inoculated with R-1 showed no symptoms and the fungus quickly developed new sclerotia (Figure 10).
FIGURE 9
FIGURE 10
Discussion
Knowledge of the microbial flora associated with mosses is expected to be important for control and preservation of global and local environments. Moss–fungus interactions have been extensively studied from ecological and biological perspectives (e.g., Shcherbakov et al., 2013; Szentes et al., 2013). Fungal communities and biomass in the bryophyte communities in different seasons have also been studied (Davey et al., 2012). Many mosses are economically important, because they can be used for greening, gardening and as ornamentals. However, the contributions of microbes to moss quality are often poorly understood. In addition, given that mosses may be alternative hosts for plant-pathogenic fungi (Lehtonen et al., 2012b; Ueta and Tojo, 2016), information on moss-associated fungi is important for pest control in horticulture and agriculture.
In the present study, we isolated a fungus that causes devastating damage to Sunagoke moss (R. japonicum), which is used for greening of buildings. ITS sequence data indicated that the SR1 isolate was a strain of S. delphinii which, to the best of our knowledge, has not been previously recognized as a pathogen of R. japonicum. However, Morita (2009, 2013) reported that R. japonicum is infected by S. rolfsii, a fungus reported to be a pathogen of several bryophytes. Okabe (2002) proposed that S. delphinii and S. rolfsii are conspecific. Strain SR1 of S. delphinii described in the current study was shown to have a wide host range, including a liverwort, mosses, and several mono- and dicotyledonous seed plants, but colonization progressed more slowly in seed plants compared with non-vascular plants. We also observed that most S. oleracea plants escaped from colonization because the hyphae grew poorly, if at all. Unidentified factor(s) of plants may stimulate chemotaxis of fungi and S. oleracea may produce only limited amounts of such factor(s), or alternatively S. oleracea may produce a factor(s) that disturbs the chemotaxis.
Sclerotium spp. belong to a group of oxalate-secreting fungi. SR1 secretes an oxalic acid containing fluid (Supplementary Figure S4). The present results indicated that bryophytes may be sensitive to oxalates and, in this respect, resemble seed plants. Oxalate is suggested to be associated with development of symptoms through induction of ROS. We detected ROS using MCLA, which is a chemiluminescent dye to detect ROS but generate weak signals against H2O2 (Kambayashi and Keiki, 2003), therefore the present results suggest that ROS may be produced during oxalate decomposition by oxalate oxidase (Opaleye et al., 2006). Production of ROS is also induced by chitin in P. patens, which involves activity of the peroxidase Prx34. The WT and the Prx34-KO mutant also showed ROS generation in response to treatment with the SR1 fungal secretion, which suggested that ROS induction by the secretion is independent of Prx34 peroxidase activity. This result is consistent with the inhibitory effect of oxalate on peroxidase (Zhang and Shao, 2015), and with the possibility that the fungal secretion includes oxalate and ROS are generated through oxalate metabolism, which may be part of the moss response to the secretion. P. patens is suggested to have two putative oxalate oxidases, XP_001776467.1 and BAD86497.12, and 10 germin-like proteins are expressed (Nakata et al., 2004). However, no information is available on the catalytic activity of oxalate oxidase in P. patens. Tolerance to oxalate-producing fungi can be enhanced by introduction of oxalate metabolism to seed plants (Kesarwani et al., 2000), which suggests that it may be possible to breed a strain of R. japonicum that shows high tolerance to Sclerotium spp. by the same strategy. We observed that secretion of the putative oxalate-containing exudate seemed to be enhanced during colonization. The mechanism by which the moss induces the fungal secretion is an interesting topic for future investigation.
We observed that fungal colonization of P. patens can be prevented by two factors, namely a peroxidase expressed by the moss and an antagonistic bacterium that coexists in the moss habitat. Host-plant peroxidases may influence fungal colonization. We previously reported that Prx34, a peroxidase of P. patens, plays an important role in protection of the moss against fungal colonization and that the Prx34-KO mutant is more susceptible to fungal attack than wild-type P. patens (Lehtonen et al., 2009). Involvement of Prx34 in protection against fungi was further demonstrated in the present study, but the effect was insufficient to prevent SR1. The secreted peroxidase itself and/or the products of its catalytic activity, including ROS, may partially suppress hyphal growth. Involvement of peroxidase in recognition of pathogens and protection of host plants has been well studied (Bindschedler et al., 2006; Daudi et al., 2012; O’Brien et al., 2012; Camejo et al., 2016). Many studies have raised the possibility of enhancing resistance against pathogens by introduction of recombinant peroxidases (Wally and Punja, 2010). Given that Prx34 is secreted constitutively into the culture medium, whereas the secretion is significantly stimulated by chitosan (Lehtonen et al., 2014), Prx34 itself or products of its activity may partially affect hyphal growth. Accordingly, the hyphal growth rate was higher in the Prx34-KO mutant than in WT P. patens. When hyphae come into contact with moss cells, peroxidase may be rapidly secreted, albeit not in sufficient quantity to protect the moss, or the peroxidase may be inhibited by the fungal exudates. In contrast, the bacterium isolate R-1 (a putative strain of B. amyloliquefaciens) can prevent growth of certain fungi, including S. delphinii and Fusarium avenaceum (Akita et al., 2011) (Supplementary Figure S3), both of which cause diseases in R. japonicum. The mechanism by which R-1 influences SR1 growth requires further study, but B. amyloliquefaciens is known to produce several antifungal agents, such as iturin A (Yu et al., 2002). Given that R-1 showed no negative effect on growth of R. japonicum (Supplementary Figure S5), application of R-1 is promising as a novel protective treatment for the moss. One of the important advantages of greening with R. japonicum is the potential for long-term maintenance-free use. Therefore, management of the moss-associated bacteria may be vital for successful moss greening. Moss colonies are promising sources of bacteria that are capable of controlling pathogens (e.g., Aleti et al., 2016). Thus, it will be necessary to study the roles of R-1 and other beneficial bacteria in maintaining high moss quality in panels prepared for greening.
Statements
Author contributions
MaT and MiT made experimental design and carried out laboratory experiments. MA and JV interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript.
Acknowledgments
We express our thanks to Dr. Haruhiko Murase for his excellent support for this study. We thank Robert McKenzie, PhD, from Edanz Group (www.edanzediting.com/ac), for editing a draft of this manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00372/full#supplementary-material
FIGURE S1An example of greening of a roof with Racomitrium japonicum.
FIGURE S2Fungal isolate SR1 hyphae growing on an infected host plant. Leaf tissue of Hordeum vulgare is shown as an example. The hyphae were stained with Cotton blue. Bar = 10 μm.
FIGURE S3Halo formation by bacterium isolate R-1, a putative strain of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, against Fusarium avenaceum on malt agar medium. Bar = 1 cm.
FIGURE S4SR1 secretes oxalate containing fluid. Relationship between culture period and the oxalic acid content of secretion fluid was shown (A). Secretion fluid was collected from each sclerotium by careful pipetting from the culture plate (see Figure 2). The fluid from one plate was mixed together and the oxalic acid content was measured by a commercial kit (Enzykit Oxalic acid, J.K.international, Tokyo, Japan) according to the instruction manual. The oxalic acid content was independent with the culture period. The content was varied but significantly higher than the content of oxalic acid in the medium of which P. patens started browning (B, 3 days cultured P. patens in 0.5 mM oxalic acid containing 1/10 BCD liquid medium).
FIGURE S5Effect of bacterium isolate R-1 on growth of Racomitrium japonicum. The bacterium was cultured overnight using LB liquid medium in an Erlenmeyer flask at 100 rpm at 37°C. The culture was centrifuged at ca. 1400 ×g at 4°C for 3 min. The supernatant was discarded and the pellet was rinsed with sterilized water three times, then the pellet was resuspended in sterilized water and adjusted to OD600 = 3.5. Clean gametophytes of R. japonicum were soaked in the bacterial suspension for 3 min and then transplanted to an autoclaved Plant Box containing 95 g vermiculite saturated with BCD medium. Plants were cultured under continuous illumination (ca. 80 μmol m-2 s-1) at 23°C for 3 weeks. Error bars indicate the standard deviation (n = 38 for the non-inoculated control and n = 40 for the R-1 inoculation treatment).
References
1
AkitaM.LehtonenM. T.KoponenH.MarttinenE. M.ValkonenJ. P. T. (2011). Infection of the Sunagoke moss panels with fungal pathogens hampers sustainable greening in urban environments.Sci. Total Environ.4093166–3173. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.05.009
2
AletiG.LehnerS.BacherM.CompantS.NikolicB.PleskoM.et al (2016). Surfactin variants mediate species-specific biofilm formation and root colonization in Bacillus.Environ. Microbiol.182634–2645. 10.1111/1462-2920.13405
3
AlvarezA.MontesanoM.SchmelzE.de LeonI. P. (2016). Activation of shikimate, phenylpropanoid, oxylipins, and auxin pathways in Pectobacterium carotovorum elicitors-treated moss.Front. Plant Sci.7:328. 10.3389/fpls.2016.00328
4
AnderssonR. A.AkitaM.PirhonenM.GammelgardE.ValkonenJ. P. T. (2005). Moss-Erwinia pathosystem reveals possible similarities in pathogenesis and pathogen defense in vascular and non-vascular plants.J. Gen. Plant Pathol.7123–28. 10.1007/s10327-004-0154-3
5
BindschedlerL. V.DewdneyJ.BleeK. A.StoneJ. M.AsaiT.PlotnikovJ.et al (2006). Peroxidase-dependent apoplastic oxidative burst in Arabidopsis required for pathogen resistance.Plant J.47851–863. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02837.x
6
BressendorffS.AzevedoR.KenchappaC. S.de LeonI. P.OlsenJ. V.RasmussenM. W.et al (2016). An innate immunity pathway in the moss Physcomitrella patens.Plant Cell281328–1342. 10.1105/tpc.15.00774
7
CamejoD.Guzman-CedenoA.MorenoA. (2016). Reactive oxygen species, essential molecules, during plant-pathogen interactions.Plant Physiol. Bioch.10310–23. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.02.035
8
CastroA.VidalS.de LeonI. P. (2016). Moss pathogenesis-related-10 protein enhances resistance to Pythium irregulare in Physcomitrella patens and Arabidopsis thaliana.Front. Plant Sci.7:580. 10.3389/fpls.2016.00580
9
DaudiA.ChengZ.O’BrienJ. A.MammarellaN.KhanS.AusubelF. M.et al (2012). The apoplastic oxidative burst peroxidase in Arabidopsis is a major component of pattern-triggered immunity.Plant Cell24275–287. 10.1105/tpc.111.093039
10
DaveyM. L.CurrahR. S. (2006). Interactions between mosses (Bryophyta) and fungi.Can. J. Bot.841509–1519. 10.1139/b06-120
11
DaveyM. L.HeegaardE.HalvorsenR.OhlsonM.KauserudH. (2012). Seasonal trends in the biomass and structure of bryophyte-associated fungal communities explored by 454 pyrosequencing.New Phytol.195844–856. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04215.x
12
DaveyM. L.NybakkenL.KauserudH.OhlsonM. (2009a). Fungal biomass associated with the phyllosphere of bryophytes and vascular plants.Mycol. Res.1131254–1260. 10.1016/j.mycres.2009.08.001
13
DaveyM. L.TsunedaA.CurrahR. S. (2009b). Pathogenesis of bryophyte hosts by the ascomycete Atradidymella muscivora.Am. J. Bot.961274–1280. 10.3732/ajb.0800239
14
DaveyM. L.TsunedaA.CurrahR. S. (2010). Saprobic and parasitic interactions of Coniochaeta velutina with mosses.Botany88258–265. 10.1139/B10-004
15
de LeonI. P.MontesanoM. (2013). Activation of defense mechanisms against pathogens in mosses and flowering plants.Int. J. Mol. Sci.143178–3200. 10.3390/ijms14023178
16
de LeonI. P.OliverJ. P.CastroA.GaggeroC.BentancorM.VidalS. (2007). Erwinia carotovora elicitors and Botrytis cinerea activate defense responses in Physcomitrella patens.BMC Plant Biol.7:52. 10.1186/1471-2229-7-52
17
de LeonI. P.SchmelzE. A.GaggeroC.CastroA.AlvarezA.MontesanoM. (2012). Physcomitrella patens activates reinforcement of the cell wall, programmed cell death and accumulation of evolutionary conserved defense signals, such as salicylic acid and 12-oxo-phytodienoic acid, but not jasmonic acid, upon Botrytis cinerea infection.Mol. Plant Pathol.13960–974. 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2012.00806.x
18
HendrawanY.MuraseH. (2011). Bio-inspired feature selection to select informative image features for determining water content of cultured Sunagoke moss.Expert Syst. Appl.3814321–14335. 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.05.097
19
HoshinoT.TojoM.KandaH.TronsmoA. M. (2001). Ecological role of fungal infections of moss carpet in Svalbard.Mem. Natl. Inst. Polar Res.54507–513.
20
HuhtinenS.LaukkaT.DobbelerP.StenroosS. (2010). Six novelties to European bryosymbiotic discomycetes.Nova Hedwig.90413–431. 10.1127/0029-5035/2010/0090-0413
21
KambayashiY.KeikiO. (2003). Reestimation of Cypridina luciferin analogs (MCLA) as a chemiluminescence probe to detect active oxygen species-cautionary note for use of MCLA.J. Toxicol. Sci.28139–148. 10.2131/jts.28.139
22
KesarwaniM.AzamM.NatarajanK.MehtaA.DattaA. (2000). Oxalate decarboxylase from Collybia velutipes-Molecular cloning and its overexpression to confer resistance to fungal infection in transgenic tobacco and tomato.J. Biol. Chem.2757230–7238. 10.1074/jbc.275.10.7230
23
KimK. S.MinJ.-Y.DickmanM. B. (2008). Oxalic acid is an elicitor of plant programmed cell death during Sclerotinia sclerotiorum disease development.Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.21605–612. 10.1094/MPMI-21-5-0605
24
LehtonenM. T.AkitaM.FrankW.ReskiR.ValkonenJ. P. T. (2012a). Involvement of a class III peroxidase and the mitochondrial protein tspo in oxidative burst upon treatment of moss plants with a fungal elicitor.Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.25363–371. 10.1094/MPMI-10-11-0265
25
LehtonenM. T.MarttinenE. M.AkitaM.ValkonenJ. P. T. (2012b). Fungi infecting cultivated moss can also cause diseases in crop plants.Ann. Appl. Biol.160298–307. 10.1111/j.1744-7348.2012.00543.x
26
LehtonenM. T.AkitaM.KalkkinenN.Ahola-IivarinenE.RonnholmG.SomervuoP.et al (2009). Quickly-released peroxidase of moss in defense against fungal invaders.New Phytol.183432–443. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02864.x
27
LehtonenM. T.TakikawaY.RonnholmG.AkitaM.KalkkinenN.Ahola-IivarinenE.et al (2014). Protein secretome of moss plants (Physcomitrella patens) with emphasis on changes induced by a fungal elicitor.J. Proteome Res.13447–459. 10.1021/pr400827a
28
MachadoL.CastroA.HambergM.BannenbergG.GaggeroC.CastresanaC.et al (2015). The Physcomitrella patens unique alpha-dioxygenase participates in both developmental processes and defense responses.BMC Plant Biol.15:45. 10.1186/s12870-015-0439-z
29
MartinK. J.RygiewiczP. T. (2005). Fungal-specific PCR primers developed for analysis of the ITS region of environmental DNA extracts.BMC Microbiol.5:28. 10.1186/1471-2180-5-28
30
MoritaA. (2009). Occurrence of southern blight disease caused by Sclerotium rolfsii Saccardo on Bryum argenteum.Kyushu Plant Prot. Res.5589–92. 10.4241/kyubyochu.55.89
31
MoritaA. (2013). Occurrence of southern blight disease caused by Sclerotium rolfsii Saccardo on bryophyte.Kyushu Plant Prot. Res.5925–30. 10.4241/kyubyochu.59.25
32
NakataM.WatanabeY.SakuraiY.HashimotoY.MatsuzakiM.TakahashiY.et al (2004). Germin-like protein gene family of a moss, Physcomitrella patens, phylogenetically falls into two characteristic new clades.Plant Mol. Biol.56381–395. 10.1007/s11103-004-3475-x
33
O’BrienJ. A.DaudiA.FinchP.ButtV. S.WhiteleggeJ. P.SoudaP.et al (2012). A Peroxidase-dependent apoplastic oxidative burst in cultured Arabidopsis cells functions in MAMP-elicited defense.Plant Physiol.1582013–2027. 10.1104/pp.111.190140
34
OkabeI. (2002). Genetic variation in Sclerotium rolfsii.Bull. Natl. Inst. Agroenviron. Sci.211–39.
35
OliverJ. P.CastroA.GaggeroC.CasconT.SchmelzE. A.CastresanaC.et al (2009). Pythium infection activates conserved plant defense responses in mosses.Planta230569–579. 10.1007/s00425-009-0969-4
36
OpaleyeO.RoseR. S.WhittakerM. M.WooE. J.WhittakerJ. W.PickersgillR. W. (2006). Structural and spectroscopic studies shed light on the mechanism of oxalate oxidase.J. Biol. Chem.2816428–6433. 10.1074/jbc.M510256200
37
ShcherbakovA. V.BraginaA. V.KuzminaE. Y.BergC.MuntyanA. N.MakarovaN. M.et al (2013). Endophytic bacteria of Sphagnum mosses as promising objects of agricultural microbiology.Microbiology82306–315. 10.1134/S0026261713030107
38
StenroosS.LaukkaT.HuhtinenS.DobbelerP.MyllysL.SyrjanenK.et al (2010). Multiple origins of symbioses between ascomycetes and bryophytes suggested by a five-gene phylogeny.Cladistics26281–300. 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2009.00284.x
39
SzentesS.RaduG. L.LasloE.LanyiS.MaraG. (2013). Selection and evaluation of potential biocontrol rhizobacteria from a raised bog environment.Crop Prot.52116–124. 10.1016/j.cropro.2013.05.021
40
TakikawaY.KidaS.AsayamaF.NonomuraT.MatsudaY.KakutaniK.et al (2015). Defense responses of Aphanoregma patens (Hedw.) Lindb. to inoculation with Pythium aphanidermatum.J. Bryol.371–7. 10.1179/1743282014Y.0000000124
41
UetaS.TojoM. (2016). Pythium barbulae sp Nov isolated from the moss, Barbula unguiculata; morphology, molecular phylogeny and pathogenicity.Mycoscience5711–19. 10.1016/j.funbio.2012.04.005
42
UshadaM.MuraseH.FukudaH. (2007). Non-destructive sensing and its inverse model for canopy parameters using texture analysis and artificial neural network.Comput. Electron. Agric.57149–165. 10.1016/j.compag.2007.03.005
43
WallyO.PunjaZ. K. (2010). Enhanced disease resistance in transgenic carrot (Daucus carota L.) plants over-expressing a rice cationic peroxidase.Planta2321229–1239. 10.1007/s00425-010-1252-4
44
WilliamsB.KabbageM.KimH.-J.BrittR.DickmanM. B. (2011). Tipping the balance: Sclerotinia sclerotiorum secreted oxalic acid suppresses host defenses by manipulating the host redox environment.PLoS Pathog.7:e1002107. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002107
45
YuG. Y.SinclairJ. B.HartmanG. L.BertagnolliB. L. (2002). Production of iturin A by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens suppressing Rhizoctonia solani.Soil Biol. Biochem.34955–963. 10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00027-5
46
ZhangX.ShaoX. (2015). Characterisation of polyphenol oxidase and peroxidase and the role in browning of loquat fruit.Czech J. Food Sci.33109–117. 10.17221/384/2014-CJFS
Summary
Keywords
bryophyte, pathogen, antagonist, Racomitrium japonicum, Sclerotium delphinii, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
Citation
Tamura M, Tanabe M, Valkonen JPT and Akita M (2019) Sunagoke Moss (Racomitrium japonicum) Used for Greening Roofs Is Severely Damaged by Sclerotium delphinii and Protected by a Putative Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Isolate. Front. Microbiol. 10:372. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00372
Received
24 September 2018
Accepted
12 February 2019
Published
28 February 2019
Volume
10 - 2019
Edited by
Choong-Min Ryu, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB), South Korea
Reviewed by
Inés Ponce De León, Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable (IIBCE), Uruguay; Brigitte Mauch-Mani, University of Neuchâtel, Switzerland
Updates
Copyright
© 2019 Tamura, Tanabe, Valkonen and Akita.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Motomu Akita, akita@waka.kindai.ac.jp
†These authors have contributed equally to this work
‡Present address: Mako Tamura, Fukuchiyama Works, Sankyo Kasei Co., Ltd., Fukuchiyama, Japan
This article was submitted to Plant Microbe Interactions, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.