Sequestration of Voriconazole and Vancomycin Into Contemporary Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Circuits: An in vitro Study

Introduction

Critically ill patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are at high risk of serious infections, with rates of 15.4 per 1,000 ECMO days across all age groups (1). As the mortality of ECMO patients facing an infective event increases up to 68%, a timely and adequate antimicrobial therapy is essential to improve outcomes (1–3).

Vancomycin is widely used as the first-line treatment for both the empiric and targeted treatment of blood stream infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), coagulase-negative staphylococci (CONS), and ampicillin-resistant enterococci (1, 4–6). Although bacteria remain the most common causative agents, fungi contribute to the healthcare burden being the second cause of nosocomial infection during ECMO (1), with a prevalence ranging from 0.04 to 5%, and differences based upon age and timing of infection (2, 5). Voriconazole is a second-generation triazole and a synthetic derivative of fluconazole, acting against Candida and Aspergillus spp., which are the most frequently isolated fungi in ICU (7). Indeed, the azole class is pivotal in the prevention and treatment of invasive fungal infections in critically ill patients (7, 8). While the pharmacology of fluconazole, which is the recommended first-line treatment against Candida spp., has been extensively addressed in the pediatric ECMO population (9–11), scanty evidence is available for voriconazole, a first-line treatment for invasive aspergillosis (7, 12, 13).

Besides the choice of the proper agent, the selection of the right dose to attain target exposure is crucial for therapeutic success (14). Drug dosing is known to be complex in critically ill patients, and it is further complicated in specific populations, in which pathology-related factors sum up to physiologic age-specific PK changes (15). The need for an extracorporeal support adds interfering mechanisms, which are responsible for further PK variability (16).

ECMO is increasingly spreading, especially across adult intensive care settings, to support potentially reversible cardiac or respiratory failure, unresponsive to conventional treatment (17). This procedure requires the addition of fluids and exogenous blood products to prime the circuit, thereby increasing the circulating volume. As a consequence of hemodilution, priming compositions, and organ dysfunction, both the volume of distribution (Vd) and clearance (Cl) of drugs are altered (18). A certain degree of sequestration into the circuit may be expected based on the physicochemical characteristics of a drug, such as molecular size, plasma protein binding, degree of ionization at physiological pH, and lipophilicity, as all are based on the characteristics of the circuits and oxygenators (18–21). Moreover, the exposure of blood to the exogenous surface triggers a systemic inflammatory response, further contributing to altered antimicrobial disposition and overall therapeutic efficacy (16, 20, 22).

Despite the wide use of antimicrobial agents during ECMO (23), PK data related to newer systems are limited and heterogeneous, resulting in a poor level of evidence-based pharmacotherapy (22, 24). Previous pharmacological knowledge (25–27) needs to be updated according to the recent advances of extracorporeal technology to prevent altered antimicrobial exposure during ECMO. Furthermore, the optimization of pharmacotherapy is required to limit the burden of microbial resistance (28, 29).

The aim of this study was to provide new insights into the disposition of voriconazole and vancomycin in contemporary neonatal, pediatric, and adult ECMO circuits.

Materials and Methods

The study was carried out at the Intensive Care Unit of the Sophia Children's Hospital—ECMO Center, Erasmus MC in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. The need for the institutional review board approval was waived as ethical approval was not required, according to the Dutch Law of research on human subjects. In particular, the fact that no patients were used in this in vitro study determined this decision. Study circuits were provided by the Xenios^® company as part of an unrestricted research grant.

In vitro ECMO Model

The in vitro ECMO model has been previously published (28). Here, we present a brief overview of the setting. We have set up nine different in vitro ECMO circuits, consisting of four iLAActivve^® kits: iLA-ActivveMiniLung^® petite kits (n = 3), iLA-ActivveMiniLung^® kits (n = 2), iLA-ActivveiLA^® kits (n = 2), and iLA-Activve X-lung^® kits (n = 2). They were made up of hollow fiber oxygenators with a diffusion membrane for neonatal, pediatric, and adult patients. All circuits were whole blood primed, connected to a 100-ml reservoir bag and run for 24 h at a flow rate of 500 ml/min (neonatal), 700 ml/min (infant), 2.5 L/min (pediatric), and 3.5 L/min (adult) with an estimated circuit volume of 225, 280, 360, and 400 ml, respectively. Anticoagulation was provided by administering a bolus of heparin 500 UI to maintain activated clotting times over 200 s. Experimental conditions (temperature, pH, hematocrit) have been maintained stable throughout the study period, as previously described (30).

Drug Selection and Administration

We selected voriconazole and vancomycin for their clinical relevance in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) practice and as illustrative examples of different chemical properties and their drug classes. Dosing for neonatal circuits was based on a standardized neonatal weight (3.5 kg), while for the other systems, we have increased the dose in proportion to the rise of volume to achieve similar theoretical concentrations. We injected voriconazole 35 mg/40 mg/52.5 mg/68 mg (neonatal/infant/pediatric/adult) followed by vancomycin 45 mg/54 mg/67.5 mg/91.8 mg through a line connected to the tubing right after the reservoir bag (P1), with 5-s intervals in-between injections. We flushed the line with 1 ml of physiological saline solution (0.9%) after voriconazole administration to avoid crystallization or pooling effects.

Samples

A line attached to the tubing prior to the reservoir bag was used as a pre-membrane (P2) sample-drawing site. For each system, we collected samples before a single-bolus drug administration (T0) and during the circuit run at the following time intervals: 2 (T2), 10 (T10), 30 (T30), 180 (T180), 360 (T360) min, and 24 h (T24) after injection. At T2, a control sample was collected and analyzed at 24 h (T2-24) to determine spontaneous drug degradation. The T2–24 samples were stored in ethylenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA) sample tubes, which were maintained at the same temperature as the tested systems until 24 h. For all other samples (T0–T24), whole blood was collected in polypropylene EDTA tubes and stored at 4°C for a maximum of 12 h until further processing. Afterward, all blood samples were centrifuged (3,000 rounds/min for 6 min), and the plasma supernatant was transferred to labeled polypropylene cryogenic vials with polyethylene screw caps (Nalgene Labware, Rochester, NY, USA). Plasma samples were maintained at −80°C until measurement.

Quantification of Drugs in Plasma Samples

Voriconazole and vancomycin were analyzed by means of ultrafast liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) in the pharmacy laboratory of Erasmus MC, as previously described (30) with regard to voriconazole or a validated immune-assay (Architect, Abbott) for vancomycin. Methods were validated according to the US Food and Drug Administration guidelines for bioanalytical method validation (31).

Reference values are reported [including lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) and upper limit of quantification (ULOQ)]. Intra- and inter-assay means were within 15% of the target range value, as requested by the FDA. For voriconazole, the linear calibration range was 0.1–10 ng/ml. For vancomycin, the linear calibration range was 0.6–50 mg/L.

Spontaneous Drug Degradation and Expected Drug Levels

Spontaneous drug degradation was defined as the amount of drug left after 24 h of spontaneous decay, and it was calculated as a difference in drug recovery between T2 and T2–24. Expected blood drug levels were calculated, accounting for the amount of drug administered and the total circulating volume. Mean recovery of each circuit category at 24 h was corrected by the average drug spontaneous degradation.

Data Analysis

We performed a comparative evaluation of drug disposition between four different ECMO circuits (MiniLung^® petite: MLP, MiniLung^®: ML, iLAActivve^®: iLA, Xlung^®). We calculated the average recovery corrected by spontaneous drug degradation at 2, 10, 30 min and 3, 6, and 24 h across all circuit categories. The trend over time is presented for the entire study period for each drug (see Figures 1, 2). Data are expressed as mean (±SD) or percentage. All analyses were performed using R version 3.4.3 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Voriconazole: mean drug recovery (%) plotted vs. time (min) over 24 h for antimicrobial across the four different categories of systems tested: Minilung petite (green), MiniLung (blue), iLaActivve (dark blue), and XLung (light blue).

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. Vancomycin: mean drug recovery (%) plotted vs. time (min) over 24 h for antimicrobial across the four different categories of systems tested: Minilung petite (green), MiniLung (blue), iLaActivve (dark blue), and XLung (light blue).

Results

In vitro ECMO models were maintained under physiological conditions for 24 h. Throughout the experimental time, we did not experience any circuit complications. A total of 72 samples (eight for each circuit) were analyzed, in triplicate, for each drug. All baseline plasma samples were free of study drugs.

The recovery of drugs after a 24-h exposure to the extracorporeal circuit has been corrected for average drug spontaneous degradation, and it is graphically reported in Figures 1, 2. The mean percentage of drug recovery at 24 h was 20% for voriconazole and 62% for vancomycin. While the loss of voriconazole was similar across all age circuits, vancomycin levels decreased by 38% in the miniLung petite, by 25% in the minilung, by 38% in the ILA active, and by 50% in the XLung circuits (Table 1). Drug physicochemical properties, namely, lipophilicity and protein binding, were derived from the Drug Bank online database (32) and are summarized in Table 1.

TABLE 1

Table 1. Mean drug recovery (mg/L; ±SD) after 24 h of circulation in the study testing circuits (r), corrected for spontaneous drug degradation compared to expected drug levels (e).

Discussion

Suboptimal antimicrobial exposure may be associated with therapeutic failure, toxicity, antimicrobial resistance, and, ultimately, worsened patient outcomes (2, 3). In this in vitro study, we provide the equipment-related disposition of voriconazole and vancomycin in contemporary ECMO circuitry with iLAActivve, contributing insights into circuit- and drug-specific determinants of PK changes during ECMO. Voriconazole was largely sequestered in the circuits, with no distinction across the different circuit sizes. Vancomycin was absorbed slightly more in the neonatal (miniLung petite), pediatric (ILA active), and adult (XLung) circuits than in the infant ones (miniLung). Spontaneous drug decay over 24 h was limited for both study drugs.

We consider these drugs as representative for the pharmacological classes they belong to, thus extending the relevance of our findings.

As expected, based on its lipophilicity and high protein binding (32), voriconazole was largely sequestered in the systems, uniformly across all size groups. Our data confirm those by Mehta et al., who reported a dramatic loss of 60% of voriconazole within 3 h from administration, in an ex vivo silicone membrane-based model of blood primed circuit (33). Similarly, the altered PK profile of voriconazole has been observed in pediatric and adult case series (34, 35), showing a drop of voriconazole plasma levels immediately after ECMO initiation or membrane change (36). Higher initial loading and daily doses have been suggested, with an intense therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to allow the attainment of therapeutic serum concentrations (37).

Vancomycin is a hydrophilic and moderately protein-bound agent and, given the narrow therapeutic window and the risk of nephrotoxicity, its PK profile has been extensively evaluated both in in vitro and in vivo settings (25–27). Indeed, targeting the ratio of the area under the vancomycin concentration–time curve over a 24-h period to the minimum inhibitory concentration of the bacteria is crucial, especially among critically ill patients (1, 38). Based on previous neonatal studies, vancomycin has shown an increased volume of distribution (Vd) and a decreased clearance (Cl) during ECMO, resulting in prolonged half-life (25–27). However, these findings were related to older roller pump-based systems, whereas data on centrifugal pump-based circuits are limited. In vitro studies on adult contemporary circuits have revealed either steady vancomycin levels or minimal loss over 24 and 48 h (22, 39). In contrast, we have observed a substantial decay of vancomycin, especially within the first 30 min. These results are in line with our previous in vitro findings on neonatal centrifugal-based circuits (18) (Table 2). The discrepancy among these results may reflect the heterogeneity of experimental settings and highlights the need for a better understanding of drug–circuit interactions, as new materials and coatings become available. A matched-cohort study conducted in adult critically ill patients on ECMO receiving continuous infusion of vancomycin showed comparable drug concentrations between ECMO and non-ECMO patients (40). Similarly, other clinical studies showed no PK differences of vancomycin between ECMO adults and critically ill patients not on ECMO (41, 42). The inconsistency between neonatal, pediatric, and adult findings may originate from either ECMO circuit-related factors or (patho-) physiological determinants, as the priming fluid impacts more on neonatal circulating blood volume compared to adults. Pending new data from pediatric clinical PK of vancomycin, it is currently recommended to increase the loading dose and to perform TDM, with target trough plasma levels between 15 and 20 μg/ml (24, 37, 43–45).

TABLE 2

Table 2. Comparison of mean drug recovery at 24 h (%) between centrifugal pump-based in vitro studies.

Although spontaneous drug degradation was negligible for both voriconazole and vancomycin, it is methodologically rigorous to collect a dedicated sample on purpose, as the degradation may be relevant for certain drugs undergoing high spontaneous decay over time, such as midazolam (30). Moreover, according to standard practice, we have measured the total concentration of drugs, while in ECMO patients, the detection of free drug concentration could be worth exploring.

We acknowledge that our findings are not directly transferable to the bedside for a number of reasons. The number of circuits tested, which is limited by the high costs of the equipment required, calls for caution when interpreting the results to adapt the in vitro PK knowledge to clinical practice. Owing to the ex vivo setting, patient- and disease-related variables of drug disposition have not been taken into account. However, exploring the impact of circuit-related non-maturational covariates on antimicrobial PK variability is suitable to inform the ECMO compartment within the physiologically based PK modeling to develop a targeted dosing regimen during ECMO (24). Given the dearth of data related to antimicrobial drug disposition into contemporary ECMO circuits, our findings might be valuable to fill this knowledge gap in pharmacotherapy. Further efforts should be made to integrate both preclinical and clinical evidence to optimize pharmacotherapy in this vulnerable patient population by taking into account different ECMO circuit types provided by various manufacturers.

Conclusions

These results highlight the specific impact of contemporary extracorporeal technology on antimicrobial therapy in critically ill ECMO patients. Sequestration of voriconazole in newer circuits was significant and similar to older silicone-based ones. Although to a lesser extent than voriconazole, adsorption was relevant for vancomycin. As suboptimal antibiotic therapy may lead to treatment failure, maturational toxicity, and antimicrobial resistance, TDM should be performed where available.

Meanwhile, further research is required to improve dosing accuracy and move toward tailored pharmacotherapy with the aim to deliver safe and effective ECMO management, across all age groups.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics Statement

The need for the institutional review board approval was waived as ethical approval was not required, according to the Dutch Law of research on human subjects. In particular, the fact that no patients were used in this in vitro study determined this decision.

Author Contributions

GR was involved in the performance of experiments, acquisition, analysis, interpretation of data, writing of the first draft, and critical revision of the manuscript. GC and FM contributed to analysis, interpretation of data, and critical revision of the article. KA contributed to planning of the study, interpretation of the data, and critical revision of the article. BK performed the pharmacological analysis and critically revised the article. DT was involved in the conception and planning of the study, supervision of data collection, interpretation of the data, and critical revision of the article. EW was involved in the conception and planning of the study, performance of experiments, acquisition, analysis, interpretation of data, and critical revision of the manuscript. All authors revised the manuscript, gave final approval of the version to be submitted, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank Xenios Germany for providing the circuits and Griffini Miglierina Foundation for supporting this study, without being involved in study design or interpretation of results. We would also like to thank Dr. Nicola Pesenti for graphical support.

References

1. Bizzarro MJ, Conrad SA, Kaufman DA, Rycus P, Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Task Force on Infections Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. Infections acquired during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in neonates, children, and adults. Pediatr Crit Care Med. (2011) 12:277–81. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181e28894

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Pluim T, Halasa N, Phillips SE, Fleming G. The morbidity and mortality of patients with fungal infections before and during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. Pediatr Crit Care Med. (2012) 13:e288–93. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31824fbaf7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Kumar A, Roberts D, Wood KE, Light B, Parrillo JE, Sharma S, et al. Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock. Crit Care Med. (2006) 34:1589–96. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000217961.75225.E9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. MacLaren G, Schlapbach LJ, Aiken AM. Nosocomial infections during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in neonatal, pediatric, and adult patients: a comprehensive narrative review. Pediatr Crit Care Med. (2020) 21:283–90. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002190

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Grasselli G, Scaravilli V, Di Bella S, Biffi S, Bombino M, Patroniti, et al. Nosocomial infections during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: incidence, etiology, and impact on patients' outcome. Crit Care Med. (2017) 45:1726–33. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002652

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Rybak MJ, Lomaestro BM, Rotscahfer JC, Moellering RC Jr, Craig WA, Billeter M, et al. Vancomycin therapeutic guidelines: a summary of consensus recommendations from the infectious diseases Society of America, the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Clin Infect Dis. (2009) 49:325–7. doi: 10.1086/600877

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Chatelon J, Cortegiani A, Hammad E, Cassir N, Leone M. Choosing the right antifungal agent in ICU patients. Adv Ther. (2019). 36:3308–20 doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01115-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Watt K, Manzoni P, Cohen-Wolkowiez M, Rizzollo S, Boano E, Jacqz-Aigrain, et al. Triazole use in the nursery: fluconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, and ravuconazole. Curr Drug Metab. (2013) 14:193–202. doi: 10.2174/138920013804870583

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Watt KM, Benjamin DK Jr, Cheifetz IM, Moorthy G, Wade KC, Smith PB, et al. Pharmacokinetics and safety of fluconazole in young infants supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Pediatr Infect Dis J. (2012) 31:1042–7. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31825d3091

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Watt KM, Gonzalez D, Benjamin DK, Brouwer KL, Wade KC, Capparelli E, et al. Fluconazole population pharmacokinetics and dosing for prevention and treatment of invasive Candidiasis in children supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. (2015) 59:3935–43. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00102-15

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Watt KM, Cohen-Wolkowiez M, Barrett JS, Sevestre M, Zhao P, Brouwer KL, et al. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic approach to determine dosing on extracorporeal life support: fluconazole in children on ECMO. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. (2018) 7:629–37. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12338

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Ruiz S, Papy E, Da Silva D, Nataf P, Massias L, Wolff M, et al. Potential voriconazole and caspofungin sequestration during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Intensive Care Med. (2009) 35:183. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1269-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Koch BC, Wildschut ED, de Goede AL, de Hoog M, Brüggemann RJ. Insufficient serum caspofungin levels in a paediatric patient on ECMO. Med Mycol Case Rep. (2013) 2:23–4. doi: 10.1016/j.mmcr.2012.12.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Roberts JA, Kumar A, Lipman J. Right dose, right now: customized drug dosing in the critically ill. Crit Care Med. (2017) 45:331–6. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002210

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Allegaert K, van den Anker JN, Naulaers G, de Hoon J. Determinants of drug metabolism in early neonatal life. Curr Clin Pharmacol. (2007) 2:23–9. doi: 10.2174/157488407779422294

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Buck ML. Pharmacokinetic changes during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: implications for drug therapy of neonates. Clin Pharmacokinet. (2003) 42:403–17. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200342050-00001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Sauer CM, Yuh DD, Bonde P. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use has increased by 433% in adults in the United States from 2006 to 2011. ASAIO J. (2015). 61:31–6. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000160

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Wildschut ED, Ahsman MJ, Allegaert K, Mathot RAA, Tibboel D. Determinants of drug absorption in different ECMO circuits. Intensive Care Med. (2010) 36:2109–16. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-2041-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Mulla H, Lawson G, von Anrep C, Burke MD, Upton DU, Firmin RK, et al. In vitro evaluation of sedative drug losses during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Perfusion. (2000) 15:21–6. doi: 10.1177/026765910001500104

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Wildschut ED, Ahsman M, Houmes RJ, Pokorna P, de Wildt SN, Mathot RAA, et al. Pharmacotherapy in neonatal and pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Curr Drug Metab. (2012) 13:767–77. doi: 10.2174/138920012800840383

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Bhatt-Mehta V, Annich G. Sedative clearance during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Perfusion. (2005) 20:309–15. doi: 10.1191/0267659105pf827oa

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Shekar K, Roberts JA, Mcdonald CI, Fisquet S, Barnett AG, Mullany DV, et al. Sequestration of drugs in the circuit may lead to therapeutic failure during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Crit Care. (2012) 16:R194. doi: 10.1186/cc11679

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Thibault C, Collier H, Naim MY, Heichel J, Schwartz E, Zuppa AF. Patterns of medication exposure in children on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a step in prioritizing future pharmacologic studies. Crit Care Explor. (2019) 1:e0045. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000045

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Raffaeli G, Pokorna P, Allegaert K, Mosca F, Cavallaro G, Wildschut ED, et al. Drug disposition and pharmacotherapy in neonatal ECMO: from fragmented data to integrated knowledge. Front Pediatrics. (2019) 7:360. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00360

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Hoie E, Swigart SA, Leuschen MP, Willett LD, Bolam DL. Vancomycin pharmacokinetics in infants undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Clin Pharm. (1990) 9:711–5.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

26. Amaker RD, Dipiro JT, Bhatia J. Pharmacokinetics of vancomycin in critically ill infants undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. (1996) 40:1139–42. doi: 10.1128/AAC.40.5.1139

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Buck ML. Vancomycin pharmacokinetics in neonates receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Pharmacotherapy. (1998) 18:1082–6.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

28. Roberts JA, Kruger P, Paterson DL, Lipman J. Antibiotic resistance—what's dosing got to do with it? Crit Care Med. (2008) 36:2433–40. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318180fe62

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Dryden M, Johnson AP, Ashiru-Oredope D, Sharland M. Using antibiotics responsibly: right drug, right time, right dose, right duration. J Antimicrob Chemother. (2011) 66:2441–3. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr370

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Raffaeli G, Allegaert K, Koch B, Cavallaro G, Mosca F, Tibboel D, et al. In vitro adsorption of analgosedative drugs in new extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuits. Pediatr Crit Care Med. (2018) 19:e251–8. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001484

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM). Guidance for Industry Bioanalytical Method Validation. (2001). Available online at: https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/Guidance/ucm070107.pdf (accessed October 15, 2017).

Google Scholar

32. Wishart DS, Knox C, Guo AC, Cheng D, Shrivastava S, Tzur D, et al. DrugBank: a knowledgebase for drugs, drug actions and drug targets. Nucleic Acids Res. (2008) 36 (Suppl. 1):D901–6. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm958

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Mehta NM, Halwick DR, Dodson BL, Thompson JE, Arnold JH. Potential drug sequestration during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: results from an ex vivo experiment. Intensive Care Med. (2007) 33:1018–24. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0606-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Spriet I, Annaert P, Meersseman P, Hermans G, Meersseman W, Verbesselt R, et al. Pharmacokinetics of caspofungin and voriconazole in critically ill patients during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Antimicrob Chemother. (2009) 63:767–70. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkp026

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Brüggemann RJ, Antonius T, van Heijst A, Hoogerbrugge PM, Burger DM, Warris A. Therapeutic drug monitoring of voriconazole in a child with invasive aspergillosis requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Ther Drug Monit. (2008) 30:643–6. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e3181898b0c

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Winiszewski H, Rougny AC, Lagoutte-Renosi J, Millon L, Capellier G, Navellou JC, et al. The pharmacokinetic challenge of treating invasive aspergillosis complicating severe influenzae assisted by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Crit Care. (2018) 22:355. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2285-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Cheng V, Abdul-Aziz MH, Roberts JA, Shekar K. Optimising drug dosing in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Thorac Dis. (2018) 10 (Suppl. 5):S629–41. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.09.154

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Varghese JM, Roberts JA, Lipman J. Antimicrobial pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic issues in the critically ill with severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Clin. (2011) 27:19–34. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2010.09.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Lemaitre F, Hasni N, Leprince P, Corvol E, Belhabib G, Fillâtre P, et al. Propofol, midazolam, vancomycin and cyclosporine therapeutic drug monitoring in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuits primed with whole human blood. Crit Care. (2015) 19:1. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0772-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Donadello K, Roberts JA, Cristallini S, Beumier M, Shekar K, Jacobs F, et al. Vancomycin population pharmacokinetics during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy: a matched cohort study. Crit Care. (2014) 18:632. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0632-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Wu C.-C., Shen LJ, Hsu LF, Ko WJ, Wu, et al. Pharmacokinetics of vancomycin in adults receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Formos Med Assoc. (2016) 115:560–70. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2015.05.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Park SJ, Yang JH, Park HJ, In YW, Lee YM, Cho H, et al. Trough concentrations of vancomycin in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. PLoS ONE. (2015) 10:e0141016. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Sherwin J, Heath T, Watt K. Pharmacokinetics and dosing of anti-infective drugs in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a review of the current literature. Clin Ther. (2016) 38:1976–94. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.07.169

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Hahn J, Choi J, Chang M. Pharmacokinetic changes of antibiotic, antiviral, antituberculosis and antifungal agents during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in critically ill adult patients. J Clin Pharm Ther. (2017) 42:661–71. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12636

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Cies JJ, Moore WS, Nichols K, Knoderer CA, Carella DM, Chopra A, et al. Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic target attainment of vancomycin in neonates on extracorporeal life support. Pediatr Crit Care Med. (2017) 18:977–85. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001250

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar