Public Health System Perspective on Implementation of Evidence-Based Fall Prevention Strategies For Older Adults

State Health Departments’ Mission and Strategies

State health departments have traditionally worked in many areas of public health, including injury prevention (1). The public health approach toward injury and disease prevention directs programs to examine surveillance data and then design, implement, and evaluate strategies to address problems, such as falls among older adults (1, 2). The emphasis is to select evidence-based strategies that have been successfully tested in research settings and translated into programs that are readily available for implementation. Fall prevention among older adults has been acknowledged as a priority topic area, and one for which evidence-based strategies have been identified (1, 3).

State Role in Fall Prevention

In 2011, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) funded state health departments in New York, Colorado, and Oregon to implement evidence-based older adult fall prevention programs over a 5-year period in several communities. The grantees were tasked to bring or expand the evidence-based programs of Stepping On, Tai Chi: Moving for Better Balance and the Otago Exercise Program to community-dwelling older adults (4). In addition, the grantees promoted the clinic-based stopping elderly accidents, deaths, and injuries (STEADI) toolkit developed by the CDC to improve medical providers’ falls prevention assessment and treatment, emphasizing referrals to the evidence-based programs in their communities (5). Each of the three states decided that instead of directly providing programing by state-level agencies, they would partner with local organizations to build infrastructure, change policies, and increase delivery and sustainability of the evidence-based programs. This commentary shares the experience from our three states after 2.5 years of efforts to build clinical and community prevention efforts to reduce falls in older adults.

Successes

The goal of the state health departments was to go beyond “business as usual.” The states worked to develop innovative partnerships to effectively reach target audiences. As illustrated with specific examples in Table 1, successful implementation of the programs by each state health department can be attributed to a number of factors. First, each state ensured that internal support for the program was integrated within the structure and function of the state health department. Second, the states disseminated the programs through a variety of creative partnerships with health care and community-based organizations not traditionally involved with public health. Third, the states learned to understand and work with the needs of their partner organizations. An important lesson for working with health care partnerships was to acknowledge their business goals and consider initiatives meaningful to each organization. Next, the state health departments made it a priority to assist the local partners with embedding the evidence-based programs within their organizational structure. This entailed building a state infrastructure for instructor training, helping partners see and develop their roles in falls prevention, and providing the technical expertise to share marketing strategies so partners could ensure their programs effectively reach the older adult audience. Lastly, each state health department applied evaluation techniques to provide feedback to the partners on the positive outcomes of the programs, and to initiate program changes when a strategy was not working.

TABLE 1

Table 1. Factors to successful implementation of a fall prevention program for older adults.

Challenges Moving Forward

All of the states developed program implementation strategies to meet these challenges:

• It took substantial time and effort to embed these programs into existing infrastructure within the state health departments and their partners. The comprehensive integrated approach requiring simultaneous implementation of four programs was a definite challenge.

• Recruiting and implementing STEADI with health care providers was difficult. Health care entities were reluctant to partner with public health agencies given the demands of the clinic practice and multiple initiatives already being promoted. Part of the challenge was the need for rapid education of health department staff in electronic medical records and Medicare billing and coding. Additionally, identifying and motivating champions within medical practices and physical therapy agencies to lead the process was problematic. In particular, medical practices do not have a strong history of patient referral to community-based programs, despite the value of those programs being well documented in the medical and public health literature (6–8).

• Implementing a clinical intervention such as Otago was challenging due to Medicare billing requirements as well as the lack of Otago experts in any of the funded state health departments. The web-based Otago training was essential for training physical therapists, although it is still uncertain exactly how the program is being implemented with patients.

• The states developed relationships with specific partners in order to ensure sustainable programing for vulnerable and underserved elderly, such as minorities, non-English speakers, and those with disabilities.

• Evidence-based programing and the need to maintain essential elements of adoption and fidelity were new concepts to many community partners. This is an area where state health departments provided technical assistance and direction (9).

Conclusion

The three states have demonstrated success in implementing evidence-based programing for fall prevention among older adults at the community level. Implementation of strategies to not only sustain but also to increase activities to penetrate the much larger state-wide older adult community remains challenging. The key to success will be to recognize fall prevention activities as an essential service in patient care and health promotion for older adults. The state health departments will continue to engage with community partners willing to make commitments to integrate fall prevention into their regular activities and to identify sustainable sources of funding and reimbursement to maintain these programs (8).

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

This paper is included in the Research Topic, “Evidence-Based Programming for Older Adults.” This Research Topic received partial funding from multiple government and private organizations/agencies; however, the views, findings, and conclusions in these articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of these organizations/agencies. All papers published in the Research Topic received peer review from members of the Frontiers in Public Health (Public Health Education and Promotion section) panel of Review Editors. Because this Research Topic represents work closely associated with a nationwide evidence-based movement in the US, many of the authors and/or Review Editors may have worked together previously in some fashion. Review Editors were purposively selected based on their expertise with evaluation and/or evidence-based programming for older adults. Review Editors were independent of named authors on any given article published in this volume.

Acknowledgments

The state projects were funded by Grant CE-11-1101 Core Violence and Injury Prevention programs (Core VIPP) from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The contents of this article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The authors would like to thank Lindsey Myers, Aerin LaCerte, and Barbara Gabella, CO, USA; Lisa Millet, Adrienne Greene, and Joe Patton, OR, USA; Meaghan Tartaglia, Kara Burke, and Harrison Moss, NY, USA for their contributions to the project.

References

1. Bryan S, Williams AN, Porter JM, Patterson A. State of the States: 2011 Report. Atlanta, GA: Safe States Alliance (2013).

Google Scholar

2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. The Public Health Approach to Violence Prevention (2014). Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/overview/publichealthapproach.html

Google Scholar

3. Stevens JA. A CDC Compendium of Effective Fall Interventions: What Works for Community-Dwelling Older Adults. 2nd ed. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (2010).

Google Scholar

4. Kaniewski M, Stevens JA, Parker EM, Lee R. An introduction to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s efforts to prevent older adult falls. Front Public Health (2015) 2:119. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00119

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. STEADI (Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths & Injuries) Tool Kit for Health Care Providers. (2014). Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/homeandrecreationalsafety/Falls/steadi/index.html

Google Scholar

6. Moyer VA; U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Prevention of falls in community-dwelling older adults: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med (2012) 157:197–204. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-157-9-201211060-00526

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Tinetti ME, Brach JS. Translating the fall prevention recommendations into a covered service; can it be done, and who should do it? Ann Intern Med (2012) 157(3):213–4. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-157-3-201208070-00014

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Panel on Prevention of Falls in Older Persons, American Geriatrics Society and British Geriatrics Society. Summary of the updated American Geriatrics Society/British geriatrics society clinical practice guideline for prevention of falls in older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc (2011) 49:148–57. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03234.x

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Wilson KM, Brady TJ, Lesesne C, on behalf of the NCCDPHP Work Group on Translation. An organizing framework for translation in public health: the knowledge to action framework. Prev Chronic Dis (2011) 8(2):A46.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | Google Scholar