Abstract
Autophagy selectively degrades viral particles or cellular components, either facilitating or inhibiting viral replication. Conversely, most viruses have evolved strategies to escape or exploit autophagy. Moreover, autophagy collaborates with the pattern recognition receptor signaling, influencing the expression of adaptor molecules involved in the innate immune response and regulating the expression of interferons (IFNs). The intricate relationship between autophagy and IFNs plays a critical role in the host cell defense against microbial invasion. Therefore, it is important to summarize the interactions between viral infections, autophagy, and the host defense mechanisms against viruses. This review specifically focuses on the interactions between autophagy and IFN pathways during viral infections, providing a comprehensive summary of the molecular mechanisms utilized or evaded by different viruses.
1 Introduction
Autophagy is an evolutionarily conserved process that maintaining intracellular homeostasis by eliminating dysfunctional organelles, protein aggregates, and senescent proteins (Levine and Kroemer, 2008). When pathogens (including DNA viruses, RNA viruses, bacteria, and parasites) infect host cells, they can induce immune responses such as autophagy within host cells (Kimura et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2019; Xiao and Cai, 2020; Wu et al., 2023).
There is an intricate interplay between autophagy and viral infections. Autophagy aids in the clearance of viruses within infected cells, suppresses viral replication, and regulates the host immune response to limit viral spread. However, it is noteworthy that most viruses have evolved strategies to exploit the host autophagy pathway for efficient infection. By utilizing autophagy, these viruses enhance their survival and replication while evading immune responses and drug therapies (Waisner and Kalamvoki, 2019). This dual role of autophagy in viral infections highlights its complexity and underscores the need for a deeper understanding of its mechanisms and regulation. This review is to comprehensively discuss the diverse molecular mechanisms employed by viruses to either exploit or evade the autophagic responses and type I interferons (IFNs) of the host cell, which may facilitate the development of novel therapeutic strategies specifically tailored to combat viral infections.
2 Diverse and multifunctional autophagy
2.1 The types of autophagy
Autophagy can be categorized into three types based on the mechanism that mediates the delivery of intracellular components to lysosomes: macroautophagy, microautophagy, and chaperon-mediated autophagy (CMA) (Orenstein and Cuervo, 2010; Mizushima et al., 2011). Macroautophagy delivers cytoplasmic cargo to the lysosome via a double membrane-bound autophagic vesicle, undergoes a process of nucleation, amplification, and closure, ultimately leading to its fusion with lysosomes to form autophagic lysosomes (ALs) (Feng et al., 2014). Microautophagy involves the direct engulfment, and degradation of cargo through the fusion of lysosomes and late endosomes (Uttenweiler and Mayer, 2008; Oku and Sakai, 2018; Wang et al., 2023). CMA is a highly selective form of autophagy that relies on chaperone proteins to specifically degrade target proteins with a unique recognition pentapeptide motif (KFERQ-like). The lysosome-associated membrane protein 2A (LAMP-2A) recognizes the exposed KFERQ group of the binding protein and directs the target protein for lysosomal degradation (Kaushik and Cuervo, 2018; Bourdenx et al., 2021).
Autophagy is divided into two categories based on the selectivity of degradation substrates: non-selective autophagy and selective autophagy (Takats et al., 2019; Martens and Behrends, 2020). Non-selective autophagy, induced by rapamycin treatment and other conditions, has no selectivity for the substrate of degradation (Russell et al., 2014; Grumati and Dikic, 2018). Specific autophagy receptors are involved in selective autophagy processes, such as ubiquitin (Ub)-dependent selective autophagy receptors (SARs), including SQSTM1/p62, neighbor of BRCA1 gene 1 (NBR1), TAX1BP1, CALCOCO2/NDP52, OPTN, AMBRA1, CCDC50, and CCPG1 (Kirkin et al., 2009; Matsumoto et al., 2011; Verstrepen et al., 2011; Khaminets et al., 2016; Viret et al., 2018; Hou et al., 2021; Zhou et al., 2021). Ub-independent selective autophagy receptors include BNIP3, PHB2, NIX/BNIP3L, FAM134B, FUNDC1, TBC15, TBC1D5, STBD1, and UIM-type autophagy receptors (Zhang and Ney, 2009; Jiang et al., 2011; Chen et al., 2016a; Borg Distefano et al., 2018; Marshall et al., 2019; Jiang et al., 2020; Yan et al., 2020). Depending on the autophagic cargo, selective autophagy can be further categorized into different types, including proteaphagy (for proteasomes) (Bartel, 2015; Beese et al., 2019), mitophagy (for mitochondria) (Zhang et al., 2022b), ER-phagy (for endoplasmic reticulum, ER) (Mochida and Nakatogawa, 2022), glycophagy (for glycogen) (Zhao et al., 2018), lipophagy (for lipid droplets) (Singh et al., 2009), nucleophagy (for nucleus) (Papandreou and Tavernarakis, 2020), lysophagy (for lysosomes) (Eapen et al., 2021), pexophagy (for peroxisome) (Zheng et al., 2022), ribophagy (for DNA or RNA phagocytosis) (An et al., 2020), aggrephagy (for protein and RNA aggregates) (Pankiv et al., 2007), ferritinophagy (for ferritin) (Mancias et al., 2015), and xenophagy (for pathogens) (Papadopoulos et al., 2020).
Autophagy is a tightly regulated and stress-induced catabolic pathway that consists mainly of typical and non-canonical autophagy pathways. Typical autophagy is more formally known as macroautophagy, and the non-canonical autophagy pathway is a subclass of autophagy. Instead of relying on intact autophagosomal progenitors, non-canonical autophagy utilizes specific autophagosomal proteins for membrane modification. One form of non-canonical autophagy is known as LC3-associated autophagy (LAP), which is particularly reliant on rubicon proteins. The interaction between rubicon and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases (PI3Ks) triggers the initiation of LAP (Durgan et al., 2021). Furthermore, the Golgi complex is a potential membrane platform for non-canonical autophagy. The V-ATPase plays an important role in this process (Gao et al., 2016).
2.2 The process of autophagy
Generally, autophagy requires five consecutive steps: initiation, double membrane nucleation and phagosome formation, phagosome elongation and cargo sequestration, fusion of autophagosomes with lysosomes to form autolysosomes, and cargo degradation. The autophagy-related (Atg) proteins function as macromolecular complexes at different steps of the autophagy process, including the ULK complex (also known as the autophagy initiation complex, including ULK1/2, Atg13, FIP200, and Atg101) (Hara et al., 2008; Nakatogawa et al., 2012; Li et al., 2020; Yao et al., 2020), Atg9/Atg9-containing vesicles (Kotani et al., 2018), the class III phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase complex (PI3KC3) (including PI(3)KC3, p150, beclin 1, Atg14L, UVRAG, BIF-1, and rubicon) (Seaman et al., 1997; Hamasaki et al., 2013; Dikic, 2017; Chen et al., 2021), and the Atg12-Atg5 conjugation system (Fan et al., 2011; Fletcher et al., 2018), and the Atg8-PE conjugation system (Geng and Klionsky, 2008; Choy et al., 2012; Tsuboyama et al., 2016). Specifically, the activated ULK1 initiation complex binds Vps34/PIK3C3-Vps30/BECN1 and phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate (PtdIns3P) to form a complex that favors phagosome extension. The Atg12-Atg5 binds system mediate phagocytic vesicle elongation, sequestering the contents inside the autophagosome and possibly regulating fusion with the phagosome. Rab GTPase and SNARE mediate the fusion of autophagosomes with endosomes, multivesicular bodies (MVB), or lysosomes (Levine et al., 2011; Fletcher et al., 2018). Autophagosomes mature to fuse with vesicles from endosomal systems, including early and late endosomes. Finally, autophagosomes fuse with lysosomes to form autolysosomes, which utilize hydrolytic enzymes in lysosomes to degrade autophagic cargo (Chen et al., 2021) (Figure 1).
Figure 1
3 Autophagy regulates innate immunity and effects the replication of DNA viruses
3.1 Interplay between cGAS-STING and autophagy impacts viral replication
dsDNA serves as a trigger for the innate immune response, leading to the production of type I IFNs and IFN-stimulated genes. Upon DNA binding, cGAS generates cGAMP, which in turn binds to STING (Sun et al., 2013). The cGAMP-STING interaction activates the kinases IKK and TBK1 to induce IFNs production (Wu et al., 2013; Wu and Chen, 2014; Crowl et al., 2017). Indeed, several studies have demonstrated that STING also can activate autophagy. Following viral infection, cGAS can directly trigger autophagy, and the presence of cGAMP or poly(dA:dT) can stimulate STING to induce autophagy (Liu et al., 2019; Zhao et al., 2021). Upon binding to cGAMP, STING is translocated to the endoplasmic reticulum-Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC) and the Golgi. The STING-loaded ERGICs serve as a membrane source for LC3 lipidation, a critical step in autophagy. The cGAMP triggered the LC3 lipidation process via WIPI2 and Atg5, which further explains the molecular mechanism by which STING activates autophagy (Gui et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2021b). Selective autophagy is involved in the cGAS-STING signaling pathway. For example, cGAS is significant in recognizing DNA, and the autophagic cargo receptor SQSTM1/p62 can target and degrade K63-linked cGAS, inhibiting the cGAS-STING signaling (Chen et al., 2016b). The K63 ubiquitination of STING leads to the autophagic degradation of STING, preventing the excessive activation of the cGAS-STING signaling and reducing the type I IFN response. Meanwhile, the TBK1 phosphorylates and activates the IFN regulatory factor 3 (IRF3), which leads to the dimerization of IRF3 into the nucleus and the production of type I IFNs (Andrejeva et al., 2004).
3.1.1 The cGAS-STING pathway inhibits viral replication by inducing autophagy
cGAMP-induced autophagy is important for clearing DNA from the cytosol, although it can enhance the replication capabilities of certain viruses (Sun et al., 2013). Studies have found that several proteins of African swine fever virus (ASFV) promote viral replication by inducing autophagy and negatively regulating the production of type I IFNs. For example, the ASFV A137R protein negatively regulates the autophagy-mediated lysosomal degradation of the cGAS-STING-mediated IFN-β signaling pathway by targeting TBK1. Further studies revealed that deletion of this protein leads to a significant reduction in the virulence of the ASFV Georgia strain (Gladue et al., 2021; Sun et al., 2022). In addition, the ASFV MGF-505-7R protein interacts with STING, inhibits the cGAS-STING pathway at the level of STING, and degrades STING by promoting the expression of ULK1 (Li et al., 2021). The MGF-505-7R deletion in the ASFV genome leads to more IFN-β and less viral replication in porcine alveolar macrophages (Li et al., 2021).
Selective autophagy recognizes and degrades specific cargo labeled with ubiquitination by the E3 ubiquitin ligase family proteins (van Gent et al., 2018), including the tripartite motif (TRIM) proteins, which are key regulators of innate immunity. Some TRIM proteins are involved in the regulation of type I IFNs through cytokine (such as IFN and TNF-α) signaling and cytoplasmic PRR (such as MAD5 and RIG-I) (Versteeg et al., 2014). Herpes simplex virus (HSV) replication is enhanced in TRIM23−/− mouse embryo fibroflasts (MEFs). Specifically, the unconventional K27-linked autoubiquitination of the ARF domain of TRIM23 activates TBK1, promotes SQSTM1/p62 phosphorylation, and degrades ubiquitinated proteins through the autophagy-lysosomal pathway. TRIM23 is essential for autophagy-mediated restriction of a wide range of viruses, an activity that is dependent on its RING E3 ligase and ADP-ribosylation factor (ARF) GTPase activities (Sparrer et al., 2017) (Figure 2).
Figure 2
The SQSTM1/p62-mediated autophagy plays a critical role in selectively degrading RIG-I and STING (Xie et al., 2022). Moreover, the Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) XPO1 can inhibit induced retention of autophagy adaptor protein SQSTM1/p62 aggregation in the nucleus, thereby enhancing TBK1 and IRF3 activation and type I IFN signaling, leading to inhibit KSHV replication (Meng and Gao, 2021).
3.1.2 Autophagy facilitates viral replication through the cGAS-STING pathway
Autophagy can indirectly attenuate the cGAS-STING signaling pathway, thus preventing excessive activation of cGAS and sustained immune stimulation (Liang et al., 2014). In cells infected with HSV-1, beclin 1 interacts with cGAS, and inhibiting cGAMP synthesis and type I IFN production. Autophagy-mediated degradation removes cytoplasmic pathogen DNA detected by DNA sensors and impairs the transduction of the cGAS-STING signaling pathway (Liang et al., 2014). Furthermore, the HSV-1 UL21 and pseudorabies virus (PRV) proteins induce the E3 ligase UBE3C-mediated K27-linked ubiquitination of cGAS, and the UL21 protein interacts with the selective autophagy receptor TOLLIP to form a complex that recognizes and degrades ubiquitinated cGAS through the autophagy-lysosomal pathway, ultimately inhibiting type I IFNs to promote viral replication (Ma et al., 2022).
TRIM proteins are involved not only in the regulation of type I IFNs, but also in selective autophagy to recognize autophagic cargo (Versteeg et al., 2014; van Gent et al., 2018). The herpesviral BPLF1 forms a three-molecule complex with TRIM25, 14-3-3 and promotes the self-ubiquitination of TRIM25. The 14-3-3 and TRIM25 complexes are involved in the innate immune response by the K63-linked ubiquitination of RIG-I. BPLF1 blocks type I IFN response by impairing the ubiquitination of RIG-I (Gupta et al., 2018; Gupta et al., 2019). During HSV-1 infection, UL56 interacted with cGAS and inhibited its DNA binding and enzymatic activity (Zheng et al., 2022), and the TRIM9 protein promotes innate immune responses and affects HSV-1 replication (Ozato et al., 2008; Qin et al., 2016). TRIM21 can bind SQSTM1/p62, and mediates the autophagic degradation of the IRF3 dimer and inhibits the type I IFN response triggered by the cGAS-STING pathway (Kimura et al., 2015). By inhibiting STING/IRF3 signaling, TRIM21 reduces the production of type I IFNs and enhances HSV-3 replication in corneal epithelial cells (Tan and Xia, 2020) (Figure 2).
In HSV-1 infection, Trim14−/− mice were more susceptible to viral replication than wild-type mice (Chen et al., 2016b). Further studies revealed that TRIM14 is induced by type I IFNs. The TRIM14 inhibits cGAS ubiquitination by recruiting USP14 and reduces HSV-1 replication. Additionally, TRIM14 stabilizes cGAS, inhibits the p62-mediated cGAS autophagic degradation, and promotes the type I IFN signaling by recruiting USP14 to cleave the K414-linked ubiquitination at K48 of cGAS (Chen et al., 2016b) (Figure 2).
The relationship between cGAS-STING and autophagy is a fascinating area of research. The cGAS-STING signaling pathway can activate the autophagy-lysosome pathway. Conversely, autophagic lysosomes can degrade proteins ubiquitinated by the E3 ubiquitin ligase family. This process inhibits IFNs and promotes viral replication. In the development of antiviral drugs, we can consider designing drugs that target LC3 lipidation, as well as drugs that target molecules associated with the cGAS-STING signaling pathway (such as cGAS, TBK1 and IRF3) to reduce viral replication, thereby improving the efficacy of drug therapy for viral diseases.
3.2 Influence of viral replication through the autophagic PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway
3.2.1 Activation of autophagy enhances viral replication via the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway
The PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is an important intracellular signaling pathway involved in various cell life cycle activities, including autophagy (Aoki and Fujishita, 2017). Beclin 1 is a component of the class III phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K-III) complex that regulates the production of phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate (PI(3)P) (McKnight and Zhenyu, 2013). It is also involved in the recruitment of proteins necessary for autophagosome formation, and participates in the phagosome elongation process. Rubicon is a component of PI3KC3, and the interaction between rubicon and PI3Ks triggers the initiation of LAP. Moreover, the rubicon interacts with cGAS to inhibit DNA stimulation, thereby inhibiting cGAMP synthesis and type I IFN production (Funderburk et al., 2010; Kang et al., 2011; Stolz et al., 2014). Studies have shown that various viruses, such as HPV, HSV, and cytomegalovirus (CMV), can manipulate autophagy signaling pathways (Waisner and Kalamvoki, 2019). These pathways involve the Atg family, the PI3K signaling pathway, and membrane sources. Ultimately, this manipulation modulation of the delicate balance between autophagy and cell survival (Paul and Munz, 2016; Tsuboyama et al., 2016).
Sorting nexin 5 (SNX5) contains a Bin/amphiphysin/Rvs (BAR) domain. Interestingly, HSV-1 infection and replication were also increased in Snx5-/- MEFs compared with to wild-type cells. SNX5 has been shown to utilize the BAR structural domain to induce membrane bending when HSV-1 enters the endosomes (Gallop and McMahon, 2005; Mim and Unger, 2012; Dong et al., 2021). SNX5 interacts with beclin 1 and the Atg14-containing class III phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3KC3) complex 1 (PI3KC3-C1) to increase the lipid kinase activity of purified PI3KC3-C1. These findings explain an environment- and organelle-specific mechanism for initiating autophagy during viral infection (Dong et al., 2021).
During the early stages, human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16) replication promotes protein synthesis and inhibits autophagy to facilitate viral infection via the interaction of the HPV16 PsV with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and epidermal growth factor receptor (KGFR) in HaCaT cells (human keratinocytes), which leads to the rapid activation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway and the impairment of autophagy (Surviladze et al., 2013).
The hepatitis B virus (HBV) X protein (HBx) inhibits autophagy, and its induction significantly increases DNA damage and nuclear translocation of ENDOG (Chao et al., 2021). Some studies have found that HBx induces endoplasmic reticulum stress and autophagy in host cells, promoting HBV replication and secretion through the AP-LE/MVB axis (Chao et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2022). Glucosamine (GlcN) promotes HBV replication through a dual mechanism that inhibits autophagic degradation and the blocks of mTORC1 signal transduction. Specifically, GlcN hinders lysosomal acidification through its amino group, thereby blocking autophagosome degradation. In addition, GlcN exhibits feedback inhibition of the mTORC1 signal in a GTPase-dependent manner involving the Ras-associated GTP-binding protein A (RAGA), leading to a further increase in autophagosome formation (Lin et al., 2020).
3.2.2 Autophagy counteracts viral replication through the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway
On one hand, autophagic activity is regulated by the level of p62. On the other hand, p62 can also negatively regulate cellular autophagic activity by activating the mTORC1 signaling pathway. KSHV activates mTOR and its targets 4EBP1 and ULK1 and reduces bulk macroautophagy and mitophagy (Santarelli et al., 2020) (Figure 2).
Phagocyte nucleation is impelled by the induction of the beclin 1-PI3KIII complex. It has been revealed that porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) infection hampers the induction of IFN-β, both in vitro and in vivo (Li et al., 2021). In PCV2-infected cells, cGAS phosphorylation at S278 promotes K389-linked polyubiquitination of cGAS at K48, which is the recognition signal for the ubiquitin-binding structural domain of histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6). This leads to the autophagic degradation of PCV2-infected cells and the degradation of cellular cGAS (Wang et al., 2021a). In the case of PCV2-infected PK-15 cells, the AMPK and extracellular signal-related kinase (ERK) 1/2 negatively regulates the mTOR pathway by phosphorylating TSC2, leading to autophagy induction through the AMPK/ERK/TSC2/mTOR signaling pathway (Zhu et al., 2012).
During the early stages of infectious spleen and kidney necrosis virus (ISKNV)-infected CPB cells, the PI3K, AKT, p53, and mTOR were significantly upregulated in cells. The activation of the PI3K/AKT/p53 factor to significantly reduce host autophagy while increasing the expression of immune-related genes in CPB cells, ultimately inhibiting the ISKNV replication (Li et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2022a) (Figure 1).
Additionally, the neuroviral protein ICP34.5 encoded by HSV-1 binds to beclin 1 and inhibits the mammalian autophagy protein beclin 1. A mutant HSV-1 virus lacking the beclin 1-binding domain of ICP34.5 fails to inhibit autophagy in neurons and demonstrates impaired ability to cause lethal encephalitis in mice (Orvedahl et al., 2007; Qian et al., 2017) (Figure 1).
Activation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway promotes cells proliferation and protein synthesis, while inhibition of this pathway triggers autophagy. Several studies have shown that viral infection can increase viral replication by activating the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, thereby accessing additional cellular resources. In summary, investigating the effect of autophagy induction via the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway on viral replication can improve our comprehension of viral infection mechanisms and provide a foundation for the creation of new antiviral approaches.
3.3 Autophagy inhibits viral replication through the NF-κB signaling pathway
OPTN is highly homologous to the NF-κB essential modulator (NEMO), and linear ubiquitination of the OPTN UBD inhibits NF-κB (Zhu et al., 2007). The OPTN binds to interleukin 1 (IL-1) receptor-associated kinase 1 (IRAK-1), and OPTN effectively blocks TRAF6 polyubiquitination in response to IL-1β and toll-like receptor stimulation, thus further inhibiting NF-κB activation. Furthermore, OPTN regulates protein and membrane cargo transport, and helps deliver ubiquitin cargo to autolysosome (Richter et al., 2016). Specifically, the OPTN gene regulates the transport of proteins and membrane cargo from the trans-Golgi compartment to the plasma membrane (Slowicka et al., 2016; Outlioua et al., 2018; Toth and Atkin, 2018). Phosphorylation of OPTN by TBK1 enhances its binding to Ub chains and promotes selective autophagy of damaged mitochondria (Richter et al., 2016).
Interestingly, in murine cytomegalovirus, the M45 protein interacts with NEMO to target autophagosomes and it is ultimately degraded in lysosomes, blocking Toll-like receptor (TLR) and IL-1 receptor-dependent NF-κB activation at the level of the IKK complex, and inhibiting the inflammatory cascade (Fliss et al., 2012). Moreover, the KSHV-encoded FLICE inhibitory protein (vFLIP) K13 binds to the IKK complex, finally leading to the activation of the NF-κB pathway. Moreover, vCFLAR/vFLIP has been shown to be a potent autophagy inhibitor by binding to and inhibiting Atg3, which prevents LC3 targeting to phagophores (Leidal et al., 2012).
During the early stages, the HSV-1-infected cell protein 0 (ICP0) inhibits SQSTM1/p62 and OPTN. It has been revealed that the cells lacking either p62 or OPTN are able to exhibit a greater antiviral response, whereas the cells expressing exogenous p62 show reduced virus yields (Waisner and Kalamvoki, 2019). The above data demonstrate that the suppression of SQSTM1/p62 and OPTN is a viral strategy to counteract the host defenses.
3.4 Autophagy affects viral replication through the eIF2α kinase signaling pathway
eIF2α kinase, a regulator of stress-induced translational control processes, is also involved in regulating stress-induced autophagy. It has been demonstrated that divergent stress stimuli stimulate the eIF2α kinase-dependent translational arrest and the eIF2α kinase-dependent autophagy (Talloczy et al., 2002). The elF2α kinase pathway regulates the starvation- or virus-induced autophagy (B'Chir et al., 2013). During HSV-1 infection, the activation of the IFN response and eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2α kinase 2 (eIF2AK2) leads to the phosphorylation of eIF2α and the induction of autophagy (Talloczy et al., 2002; Bullido et al., 2008). Additionally, during the early stages of viral infection, USP14 directly binds to the ubiquitin chain on VP16 through its UBL domain. Inactivation of USP14 stimulates the eIF2AK3/PERK and ERN1/IRE1-mediated signaling pathways, resulting in VP16 degradation via the SQSTM1/p62-mediated autophagy, thus inhibiting herpesvirus proliferation (Ming et al., 2022). The HSV-1 ICP34.5 protein binds to beclin 1 to form a complex inhibiting autophagy (Orvedahl et al., 2007; Leib et al., 2009). The HSV-1 mutant lacking ICP34.5 triggers autophagy by activating the eIF2AK2/protein kinase RNA (PKR) activation pathway to evade, resist antiviral mechanisms and enhance viral replication (Orvedahl et al., 2007). IFN-induced PKR enhances autophagy in response to HSV-1 infection, and HSV-1 neurovirulence protein ICP34.5 inhibits this response. The HSV-1 neurovirulence protein ICP34.5 inhibits autophagy regulated by PKR or elF2α (Talloczy et al., 2002) (Table 1).
Table 1
| Viruses | Viral proteins | Atg proteins | Effects |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASFV | MGF505-7R | ULK1 | MGF-505-7R promotes the expression of ULK1 to degrade STING. |
| SARS-CoV-2 | ORF3a | Rab7 | ORF3a-VPS39 blocks the fusion of autophagosomes and lysosomes, eventually inhibiting autophagy. |
| ORF7a | SNAP29 | ORF7a cleaves the SNAP29 protein by activating caspase 3, and hampers the fusion of autophagosomes with lysosomes. | |
| ORF10 | NIX | ORF10 induces mitophagy-mediated MAVS degradation by binding to NIX. | |
| PCV2 | Cap | mTOR | The cap protein leads to autophagy by activates the PI3K/AKT signaling and PKCδ signaling. |
| HSV | ICP34.5 | Beclin 1 | ICP34.5 binds to beclin 1, thereby inhibiting autophagy. |
| HSV-1 | ICP0 | SQSTM1/p62 | HSV-1 ICP0 protein inhibits SQSTM1/p62 and OPTN. |
| ZIKV | NS4A/NS4B | Akt | NS4A and NS4B block Akt activation and potentially modulating Akt post-translational modifications. |
| KSHV | vFLIP | Atg3 | vFLIP binds to and inhibiting Atg3, thereby preventing LC3 targeting to phagophores. |
| XPO1 | SQSTM1/p62 | XPO1 promotes the activation of TBK1 and IRF3 through inhibition of nuclear aggregation of SQSTM1/p62. | |
| SVA | 2AB | LC3 | 2AB inhibits the autophagy process by degrading MARCH8 and LC3. |
| EBV | BPLF1 | SQSTM1/p62 | BPLF1 binds to SQSTM1/p62, reducing its ubiquitination and inhibiting autophagy. |
| VSV | / | Atg5-Atg12 | Atg5-Atg12 conjugate interacts with IPS-1 and RIG-I to inhibit type I IFN production. |
| HPIV3 | Phosphoprotein (P) | SNAP29 | HPIV3 P protein binds to SNAP29, blocking its interaction with protein 17 and stopping host SNARE protein-mediated autophagosome-lysosome fusion. |
| IAV | M2 | Beclin 1 | IAV M2 protein colocalizes with autophagosomes and plays an important role in inhibiting autophagosomal fusion. |
Viral proteins and the autophagy pathway.
However, a recent study indicates that the IFN-β-inducible SCOTIN (an ER-resident protein, also known as SHISA5) recruits the HCV NS5A for autophagic degradation, thereby suppressing HCV replication (Kim et al., 2016). However, the human cytomegalovirus (HCMV)-encoded protein IRS1 inhibits autophagy by interacting with beclin 1, independently of the eIF2SI kinase eIF2/PKR (Mouna et al., 2016) (Figure 2).
3.5 Other pathways
Secretory autophagy is nonlytic autophagy. In this process, autophagic cargo is secreted from autophagic vesicles into the extracellular compartment (Ponpuak et al., 2015). Previous studies have shown that secretory autophagy is associated with both immune response and inflammation (Deretic et al., 2013). GAL9, an IFN-induced innate antiviral factor, can promote autoubiquitination of RNF13, which leads to the recruitment of p62 and LC3 to initiate autophagy. GAL9 works in tandem with viperin that degrades the HBV core protein HBC, and enhances the GAL9-induced antiviral activity, which may offer therapeutic interventions against HBV (Miyakawa et al., 2022) (Figure 2). The virus-infected cells release large numbers of vesicles derived from autophagosome (Feng et al., 2013; Chen et al., 2015). Currently, there are fewer studies on secretory autophagy. Researchers can focus their studies on revealing the molecular mechanisms by which viruses utilize the secretory autophagy to promote the assembly and release of viral particles.
The SQSTM1/p62 protein has a ubiquitin-binding domain and a LC3 interaction motif, the ubiquitination of SQSTM1/p62 modifies autophagic activity (Pankiv et al., 2007). The ubiquitin uncoupling enzyme in the N-terminal domain of the large capsid protein of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), HCMV, and KSHV, regulates selective autophagy by inhibiting the activity of the autophagy receptor SQSTM1/p62 (Yao et al., 2023) (Figure 1). EBV BPLF1 is a deubiquitinating enzyme that can directly bind to the autophagy receptor SQSTM1/p62, reduce the ubiquitination level of SQSTM1/p62, and finally inhibit selective autophagy (Yla-Anttila et al., 2021). In the replication cycle of EBV, autophagy is activated in the early stage of EBV reactivation and inhibited in the subsequent stage (Granato et al., 2014). Inhibition of autophagy can significantly up-regulate the expression and replication of EBV genes and increase the production of EBV particles (Hung et al., 2014; Nowag et al., 2014). Additionally, autophagosome-lysosome fusion is reduced in a Rab7-dependent manner, leading to autophagosome accumulation and inhibiting autophagy (Granato et al., 2014; De Leo et al., 2015) (Table 1).
Numerous studies have shown that viral proteins can influence autophagy and the innate immune response during DNA virus infection through multiple pathways. The interactions between viral infection and the host antiviral mechanisms ultimately result in either enhanced or attenuated viral replication. In the future, we will investigate how innate immunity interacts with autophagy. This work will improve our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying host-generated antiviral resistance during viral infections and enable more precise targeting of antiviral drugs.
4 Autophagy regulates innate immunity and participates in the replication of RNA viruses
Cytoplasmic DNA can interact with the DNA sensor cGAS. The DNA induces IFN-β upon cGAMP production and activation of STING and TBK1/IKKϵ (Yoneyama et al., 2005; Ablasser and Hur, 2020). In addition, RNA can bind directly to the RNA sensors retinoic acid-inducible gene-I (RIG-I), MDA5 or may promote increased mitochondrial permeability and release of oxidized mitochondrial DNA into the cytoplasm. RIG-I binds preferentially to 5′-triphosphorylated viral RNA with short dsRNA stretches (Hornung et al., 2006; Kato et al., 2006; Kato et al., 2008). RIG-I is responsible for recognizing influenza virus, Sendai virus (SeV), vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV), and Newcastle disease virus (NDV) (Kato et al., 2006; Kato et al., 2008). Whereas, MDA5 exhibits a higher affinity for longer dsRNA and primarily recognizes picornaviruses, such as encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV). Several RNA viruses can be sensed by both RIG-I and MDA5 (Lian et al., 2018). Upon binding to viral RNA, both RIG-I and MDA5 are recruited to the mitochondria-localized articulatory protein mitochondrial antiviral-signaling protein (MAVS). The RNA-sensing pathway induces IFN-β upon activation of mitochondria-associated MAVS and downstream activation of signaling molecules such as TRAF3, TRAF6, TBK1/IKKϵ, and NF-κB (Yoneyama et al., 2015; Crow et al., 2019; Rehwinkel and Gack, 2020).
Both DNA and RNA viruses can employ unique strategies to modulate autophagic responses, allowing the viruses to evade damage or replicate by utilizing the structure and nutrients provided by autophagy. A comprehensive understanding of the complex relationship between RNA virus infections and the host innate immunity is critical to effective control viral infections.
4.1 Autophagy and IFN production in response to RNA viral infections
SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for COVID-19, has been shown to promote autophagy and suppressing the type I IFN response (Hui et al., 2021). It has been shown that ubiquitination of the SARS-CoV-2 ORF7a protein to inhibit the IFN response. Additionally, the ORF7a protein triggers autophagy through the AKT-mTOR-ULK1-mediated pathway (Kang et al., 2011). Overexpression of the SARS-CoV-2 ORF10 protein significantly reduces the expression of type I IFNs (Cao et al., 2021). At the same time, ORF10 is translocated to mitochondria by interacting with the mitophagy receptor Nip3-like protein X (NIX), and induces mitophagy via its interaction with both NIX and LC3B (Li et al., 2022). ORF10-induced autophagy can degrade the MAVS and promote SARS-CoV-2 replication. In short, SARS-CoV-2 ORF10 induces degradation of MAVS by binding to NIX (Li et al., 2022) (Table 1). The above evidence suggests that in order to favor its own replication, the viral protein encoded by SARS-CoV-2 induces autophagy and reduces type I IFN production.
The 2AB protein of Senecavirus A (SVA) inhibits MAVS in a membrane associated ring-CH-type finger 8 (MARCHF8)-dependent manner. Concurrently, the 2AB, MARCHF8, and LC3 proteins form a complex. The 2AB inhibits the autophagy process by degrading MARCH8 and LC3. In addition, MARCHF8 acts as a positive regulator of the type I IFN signaling pathway, and degradation of MARCHF8 can effectively inhibit type I IFN activation and promote SVA replication (Sun et al., 2022) (Table 1 and Figure 1). Similar to SARS-CoV-2, SVA is able to utilize autophagy and inhibit type I IFN responses to evade the host immune system.
Moreover, the NOD-like receptor family member X1 (NLRX1) can suppress the RIG-I-mediated IFN-β expression and promote VSV-induced autophagy (Jordan and Randall, 2012; Lei et al., 2012; Chiramel et al., 2013; Paul and Munz, 2016). The viral RNA of VSV can be sensed by the cytoplasmic RIG-I-like receptors (RLRs) to produce type I IFNs by activating the IFN-β promoter stimulator 1 (IPS-1). However, when VSV infects host cells, the Atg5-Atg12 conjugate interacts with IPS-1 and RIG-I, inhibiting the CARD-mediated signaling and leading to the inhibition of type I IFN production, thus blocking the innate antiviral immune responses (Jounai et al., 2007; Tal et al., 2009) (Table 1 and Figure 2). The discovery highlights the crucial involvement of NLRX1 in controlling viral infections, which modulates the host immune response by inhibiting IFN-β expression and promoting autophagy.
During the early stages of dengue virus (DENV) replication, autophagy is induced to mobilize the necessary membrane and lipids (Welsch et al., 2009; Heaton and Randall, 2010). DENV has evolved to inhibit STING activity, where NS2B3 protease cleaves STING to inhibit IFN induction. Meanwhile, NS2B degrades cGAS, and autophagy induced by STING activation supports mutant DENV replication in infected cells (Aguirre et al., 2012; Aguirre et al., 2017; Ng et al., 2022). The Zika virus (ZIKV) NS4A and NS4B proteins deregulate the Akt-mTOR signaling in human fetal neural stem cells to inhibit neurogenesis and induce autophagy (Liang et al., 2016) (Table 1 and Figure 1).
These findings reveal strategies by which viruses utilize mechanisms of autophagy and suppression of immune response to evade host immune attack and promote viral replication. Studying these mechanisms will help us better understand the immune evasion strategies of viral infections and provide new ideas for developing therapeutic approaches against viral infections.
4.2 Reducing autophagosome-lysosomal fusion can increase viral production
It has been found that some viruses evade autophagy by reducing the fusion of autophagosomes and lysosomes in host cells. The SARS-CoV-2 ORF3a interacts with VPS39 and is colocalized in the lysosomes. The ORF3a-VPS39 inhibits the binding of the homotypic fusion and protein sorting (HOPS) to Rab7, hinders the assembly of fusion machinery, and leads to the reduction of autophagosomes. The ORF3a strongly inhibits autophagic flux by blocking the fusion of autophagosomes and lysosomes (Zhang et al., 2021). The SARS-CoV-2 ORF7a cleaves the SNAP29 protein by activating caspase 3. The degradation of the SNAP29 protein hampers the fusion of autophagosomes with lysosomes, consequently promoting viral replication (Hou et al., 2023). The phosphoprotein of human parainfluenza virus type 3 (HPIV3) can inhibit autophagy to increase virus production. The virus phosphoprotein (P) binds to SNAP29 and inhibits its interaction with the synaptic fusion protein 17, thereby preventing the host SNARE protein-mediated autophagosome-lysosome fusion (Ding et al., 2014) (Table 1 and Figure 1).
4.3 Other types of autophagy reactions
Recently, the significance of non-canonical autophagy has been highlighted in the host antiviral immune responses. For example, LC3C contributes to the Vpu-mediated evasion of BST2/tetherin restriction on HIV-1 release through a non-canonical autophagy pathway (Madjo et al., 2016). Additionally, mice with systemic loss of non-canonical autophagy exhibited heightened susceptibility to pathogenic Influenza A virus (IAV), and non-canonical autophagy hinders the fusion of IAV with endosomes and dampens activation of the IFN signaling pathway (Wang et al., 2021). The IAV matrix protein 2 (M2), which is colocalized with autophagosomes, is able to prevent the fusion of autophagosomes with lysosomes by interacting with beclin 1 (Gannage et al., 2009; Zhong et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2019). The M2 protein interacts with MAVS and enhances the MAVS-mediated innate immunity. Moreover, the M2-induced production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) plays a critical role in activating autophagy and the MAVS signaling pathway (Wang et al., 2019). IAV infection also induces the formation of autophagosomes to facilitate viral replication (Zhou et al., 2009).
In summary, some viruses hinder the maturation of autophagosomes to prevent degradation. They subsequently exploit the autophagosome membrane to facilitate the packaging and/or release of viral particles.
Secretory autophagy, a process in which the autophagosome carrier is secreted into the extracellular environment instead of being degraded, has emerged as a prominent research area in recent years. It has been reported that several small RNA viruses can evade cellular immune response with extracellular vesicles (EVs) containing the autophagy regulatory protein LC3 (Sin et al., 2017; van der Grein et al., 2019). In the case of EMCV, its leader protein induces secretory autophagy during infection, promoting the release of viral particles in EVs (van der Grein et al., 2022).
Over the years, researchers have extensively studied the link between autophagy, type I IFN response and RNA virus infection. They have found that some RNA viruses can evade the host immune defense by interfering with autophagy and type I IFN response, leading to viral replication and transmission. Consequently, a comprehensive investigation of the regulatory mechanisms of autophagy and type I IFN responses in RNA virus infections can help to uncover the interactions between virus and host. Researchers also hope to discover new drugs or therapeutic strategies to inhibit viral replication and propagation by activating autophagy and type I IFN response, thus effectively controlling RNA virus infection.
5 Conclusions and prospects
Autophagy, an evolutionarily conserved degradative process, is used to maintain organismal homeostasis and promote the clearance of intracellular waste and invading pathogens by the host immune system, including disrupting viral structure, modulating the inflammatory response, influencing IFN production, and degrading viral components or particles. Some viruses employ unique strategies to regulate the autophagy response, allowing viruses to evade destruction or utilize the structure and nutrients provided by autophagy for their replication. On one hand, host cells can effectively counteract viral replication by regulating the signaling molecules of the IFNs and autophagy pathways through multiple pathways. On the other hand, viruses inhibit innate immune responses by regulating the expression of signaling molecules associated with the autophagy pathway, thereby accelerating autophagic degradation of cellular components. A comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms by which autophagy regulates viral replication and the interactions between autophagy and the IFN signaling pathway are needed.
This review reveals the complex relationship between viral infections and host autophagy, which is an attractive research field. Cross-regulation of autophagy and IFNs triggered by viral infection is a promising area. Further work is needed to fully understand the involvement of autophagy and IFN signaling pathways in the pathogenesis of resistance to viral infections. Importantly, current studies are mostly focused on typical autophagy, with less research on viral infection and non-canonical autophagy. Most of the existing studies evaluate the antiviral effects of autophagy in vitro, and it’s necessary to validate the effects of autophagy on viral replication in vivo, which is more important for the development of autophagy-regulated antiviral therapeutic strategies and vaccines.
Statements
Author contributions
HZ: Writing – original draft. TW: Writing – review & editing. DL: Writing – review & editing. LP: Writing – review & editing. YS: Writing – review & editing. H-JQ: Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32072854 and U20A2060).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AblasserA.HurS. (2020). Regulation of cGAS- and RLR-mediated immunity to nucleic acids. Nat. Immunol.21 (1), 17–29. doi: 10.1038/s41590-019-0556-1
2
AguirreS.LuthraP.Sanchez-AparicioM. T.MaestreA. M.PatelJ.LamotheF.et al. (2017). Dengue virus NS2B protein targets cGAS for degradation and prevents mitochondrial DNA sensing during infection. Nat. Microbiol.2, 17037. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.37
3
AguirreS.MaestreA. M.PagniS.PatelJ. R.SavageT.GutmanD.et al. (2012). DENV inhibits type I IFN production in infected cells by cleaving human STING. PLoS Pathog.8 (10), e1002934. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002934
4
AnH.OrdureauA.KornerM.PauloJ. A.HarperJ. W. (2020). Systematic quantitative analysis of ribosome inventory during nutrient stress. Nature.583 (7815), 303–309. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2446-y
5
AndrejevaJ.ChildsK. S.YoungD. F.CarlosT. S.StockN.GoodbournS.et al. (2004). The V proteins of paramyxoviruses bind the IFN-inducible RNA helicase, mda-5, and inhibit its activation of the IFN-beta promoter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.101 (49), 17264–17269. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0407639101
6
AokiM.FujishitaT. (2017). Oncogenic roles of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR axis. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.407, 153–189. doi: 10.1007/82_2017_6
7
B'ChirW.MaurinA. C.CarraroV.AverousJ.JousseC.MuranishiY.et al. (2013). The eIF2alpha/ATF4 pathway is essential for stress-induced autophagy gene expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 41 (16), 7683–7699. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt563
8
BartelB. (2015). Proteaphagy-selective autophagy of inactive proteasomes. Mol. Cell.58 (6), 970–971. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.06.004
9
BeeseC. J.BrynjolfsdottirS. H.FrankelL. B. (2019). Selective autophagy of the protein homeostasis machinery: ribophagy, proteaphagy and ER-phagy. Front. Cell Dev. Biol.7, 373. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2019.00373
10
Borg DistefanoM.Hofstad HaugenL.WangY.Perdreau-DahlH.KjosI.JiaD.et al. (2018). TBC1D5 controls the GTPase cycle of Rab7b. J. Cell Sci.131 (17), jcs216630. doi: 10.1242/jcs.216630
11
BourdenxM.GavathiotisE.CuervoA. M. (2021). Chaperone-mediated autophagy: a gatekeeper of neuronal proteostasis. Autophagy.17 (8), 2040–2042. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2021.1935007
12
BullidoM. J.Martinez-GarciaA.TenorioR.SastreI.MunozD. G.FrankA.et al. (2008). Double stranded RNA activated EIF2 alpha kinase (EIF2AK2; PKR) is associated with Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol. Aging.29 (8), 1160–1166. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.02.023
13
CaoZ.XiaH.RajsbaumR.XiaX.WangH.ShiP. Y. (2021). Ubiquitination of SARS-CoV-2 ORF7a promotes antagonism of interferon response. Cell Mol. Immunol.18 (3), 746–748. doi: 10.1038/s41423-020-00603-6
14
ChaoT.ShihH. T.HsuS. C.ChenP. J.FanY. S.JengY. M.et al. (2021). Autophagy restricts mitochondrial DNA damage-induced release of ENDOG (endonuclease G) to regulate genome stability. Autophagy.17 (11), 3444–3460. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2021.1874209
15
ChenM.ChenZ.WangY.TanZ.ZhuC.LiY.et al. (2016a). Mitophagy receptor FUNDC1 regulates mitochondrial dynamics and mitophagy. Autophagy.12 (4), 689–702. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2016.1151580
16
ChenM.MengQ.QinY.LiangP.TanP.HeL.et al. (2016b). TRIM14 inhibits cGAS degradation mediated by selective autophagy receptor p62 to promote innate immune responses. Mol. Cell.64 (1), 105–119. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.08.025
17
ChenY. H.DuW.HagemeijerM. C.TakvorianP. M.PauC.CaliA.et al. (2015). Phosphatidylserine vesicles enable efficient en bloc transmission of enteroviruses. Cell.160 (4), 619–630. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.032
18
ChenY. H.HuangT. Y.LinY. T.LinS. Y.LiW. H.HsiaoH. J.et al. (2021). VPS34 K29/K48 branched ubiquitination governed by UBE3C and TRABID regulates autophagy, proteostasis and liver metabolism. Nat. Commun.12 (1), 1322. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21715-1
19
ChiramelA. I.BradyN. R.BartenschlagerR. (2013). Divergent roles of autophagy in virus infection. Cells.2 (1), 83–104. doi: 10.3390/cells2010083
20
ChoyA.DancourtJ.MugoB.O'ConnorT. J.IsbergR. R.MeliaT. J.et al. (2012). The Legionella effector RavZ inhibits host autophagy through irreversible Atg8 deconjugation. Science.338 (6110), 1072–1076. doi: 10.1126/science.1227026
21
CrowlJ. T.GrayE. E.PestalK.VolkmanH. E.StetsonD. B. (2017). Intracellular nucleic acid detection in autoimmunity. Annu. Rev. Immunol.35, 313–336. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-051116-052331
22
Crow MKOlferievM.KirouK. A. (2019). Type I interferons in autoimmune disease. Annu. Rev. Pathol.14, 369–393. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-020117-043952
23
De LeoA.ColavitaF.CiccosantiF.FimiaG. M.LiebermanP. M.MattiaE. (2015). Inhibition of autophagy in EBV-positive Burkitt's lymphoma cells enhances EBV lytic genes expression and replication. Cell Death Dis.6 (9), e1876. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2015.156
24
DereticV.SaitohT.AkiraS. (2013). Autophagy in infection, inflammation and immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol.13 (10), 722–737. doi: 10.1038/nri3532
25
DikicI. (2017). Proteasomal and autophagic degradation systems. Annu. Rev. Biochem.86, 193–224. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-061516-044908
26
DingB.ZhangG.YangX.ZhangS.ChenL.YanQ.et al. (2014). Phosphoprotein of human parainfluenza virus type 3 blocks autophagosome-lysosome fusion to increase virus production. Cell Host Microbe15 (5), 564–577. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2014.04.004
27
DongX.YangY.ZouZ.ZhaoY.CiB.ZhongL.et al. (2021). Sorting nexin 5 mediates virus-induced autophagy and immunity. Nature.589 (7842), 456–461. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-03056-z
28
DurganJ.LystadA. H.SloanK.CarlssonS. R.WilsonM. I.MarcassaE.et al. (2021). Non-canonical autophagy drives alternative ATG8 conjugation to phosphatidylserine. Mol. Cell.81 (9), 2031–2040.e2038. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.03.020
29
EapenV. V.SwarupS.HoyerM. J.PauloJ. A.HarperJ. W. (2021). Quantitative proteomics reveals the selectivity of ubiquitin-binding autophagy receptors in the turnover of damaged lysosomes by lysophagy. eLife.10, e72328. doi: 10.7554/eLife.72328
30
FanW.NassiriA.ZhongQ. (2011). Autophagosome targeting and membrane curvature sensing by Barkor/Atg14(L). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.108 (19), 7769–7774. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1016472108
31
FengY.HeD.YaoZ.KlionskyD. J. (2014). The machinery of macroautophagy. Cell Res.24 (1), 24–41. doi: 10.1038/cr.2013.168
32
FengZ.HensleyL.McKnightK. L.HuF.MaddenV.PingL.et al. (2013). A pathogenic picornavirus acquires an envelope by hijacking cellular membranes. Nature.496 (7445), 367–371. doi: 10.1038/nature12029
33
FletcherK.UlfertsR.JacquinE.VeithT.GammohN.ArastehJ. M.et al. (2018). The WD40 domain of ATG16L1 is required for its non-canonical role in lipidation of LC3 at single membranes. EMBO J.37 (4), e97840. doi: 10.15252/embj.201797840
34
FlissP. M.JowersT. P.BrinkmannM. M.HolstermannB.MackC.DickinsonP.et al. (2012). Viral mediated redirection of NEMO/IKKgamma to autophagosomes curtails the inflammatory cascade. PLoS Pathog.8 (2), e1002517. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002517
35
FunderburkS. F.WangQ. J.YueZ. (2010). The Beclin 1-VPS34 complex–at the crossroads of autophagy and beyond. Trends Cell Biol.20 (6), 355–362. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2010.03.002
36
GallopJ. L.McMahonH. T. (2005). BAR domains and membrane curvature: bringing your curves to the BAR. Biochem. Soc. Symp.72, 223–231. doi: 10.1042/bss0720223
37
GannageM.DormannD.AlbrechtR.DengjelJ.TorossiT.RamerP. C.et al. (2009). Matrix protein 2 of influenza A virus blocks autophagosome fusion with lysosomes. Cell Host Microbe6 (4), 367–380. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2009.09.005
38
GaoY.LiuY.HongL.YangZ.CaiX.ChenX.et al. (2016). Golgi-associated LC3 lipidation requires V-ATPase in noncanonical autophagy. Cell Death Dis.7 (8), e2330. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2016.236
39
GengJ.KlionskyD. J. (2008). The Atg8 and Atg12 ubiquitin-like conjugation systems in macroautophagy. 'Protein modifications: beyond the usual suspects' review series. EMBO Rep.9 (9), 859–864. doi: 10.1038/embor.2008.163
40
GladueD. P.Ramirez-MedinaE.VuonoE.SilvaE.RaiA.PruittS.et al. (2021). Deletion of the A137R gene from the pandemic strain of African swine fever virus attenuates the strain and offers protection against the virulent pandemic virus. J. Virol.95 (21), e0113921. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01139-21
41
GranatoM.SantarelliR.FarinaA.GonnellaR.LottiL. V.FaggioniA.et al. (2014). Epstein-Barr virus blocks the autophagic flux and appropriates the autophagic machinery to enhance viral replication. J. Virol.88 (21), 12715–12726. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02199-14
42
GrumatiP.DikicI. (2018). Ubiquitin signaling and autophagy. J. Biol. Chem.293 (15), 5404–5413. doi: 10.1074/jbc.TM117.000117
43
GuiX.YangH.LiT.TanX.ShiP.LiM.et al. (2019). Autophagy induction via STING trafficking is a primordial function of the cGAS pathway. Nature.567 (7747), 262–266. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1006-9
44
GuptaS.Yla-AnttilaP.CallegariS.TsaiM. H.DelecluseH. J.MasucciM. G. (2018). Herpesvirus deconjugases inhibit the IFN response by promoting TRIM25 autoubiquitination and functional inactivation of the RIG-I signalosome. PLoS Pathog.14 (1), e1006852. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006852
45
GuptaS.Yla-AnttilaP.SandalovaT.SunR.AchourA.MasucciM. G. (2019). 14-3-3 scaffold proteins mediate the inactivation of trim25 and inhibition of the type I interferon response by herpesvirus deconjugases. PLoS Pathog.15 (11), e1008146. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008146
46
HamasakiM.FurutaN.MatsudaA.NezuA.YamamotoA.FujitaN.et al. (2013). Autophagosomes form at ER-mitochondria contact sites. Nature.495 (7441), 389–393. doi: 10.1038/nature11910
47
HaraT.TakamuraA.KishiC.IemuraS.NatsumeT.GuanJ. L.et al. (2008). FIP200, a ULK-interacting protein, is required for autophagosome formation in mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol.181 (3), 497–510. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200712064
48
HeatonN. S.RandallG. (2010). Dengue virus-induced autophagy regulates lipid metabolism. Cell Host Microbe8 (5), 422–432. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2010.10.006
49
HornungV.EllegastJ.KimS.BrzozkaK.JungA.KatoH.et al. (2006). 5'-triphosphate RNA is the ligand for RIG-I. Science.314 (5801), 994–997. doi: 10.1126/science.1132505
50
HouP.WangX.WangH.WangT.YuZ.XuC.et al. (2023). The ORF7a protein of SARS-CoV-2 initiates autophagy and limits autophagosome-lysosome fusion via degradation of SNAP29 to promote virus replication. Autophagy.19 (2), 551–569. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2022.2084686
51
HouP.YangK.JiaP.LiuL.LinY.LiZ.et al. (2021). A novel selective autophagy receptor, CCDC50, delivers K63 polyubiquitination-activated RIG-I/MDA5 for degradation during viral infection. Cell Res.31 (1), 62–79. doi: 10.1038/s41422-020-0362-1
52
HuiX.ZhangL.CaoL.HuangK.ZhaoY.ZhangY.et al. (2021). SARS-CoV-2 promote autophagy to suppress type I interferon response. Signal Transduct Target Ther.6 (1), 180. doi: 10.1038/s41392-021-00574-8
53
HungC. H.ChenL. W.WangW. H.ChangP. J.ChiuY. F.HungC. C.et al. (2014). Regulation of autophagic activation by Rta of Epstein-Barr virus via the extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway. J. Virol.88 (20), 12133–12145. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02033-14
54
JiangX.WangX.DingX.DuM.LiB.WengX.et al. (2020). FAM134B oligomerization drives endoplasmic reticulum membrane scission for ER-phagy. EMBO J.39 (5), e102608. doi: 10.15252/embj.2019102608
55
JiangS.WellsC. D.RoachP. J. (2011). Starch-binding domain-containing protein 1 (Stbd1) and glycogen metabolism: Identification of the Atg8 family interacting motif (AIM) in Stbd1 required for interaction with GABARAPL1. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.413 (3), 420–425. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.08.106
56
JordanT. X.RandallG. (2012). Manipulation or capitulation: virus interactions with autophagy. Microbes Infect.14 (2), 126–139. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2011.09.007
57
JounaiN.TakeshitaF.KobiyamaK.SawanoA.MiyawakiA.XinK. Q.et al. (2007). The Atg5-Atg12 conjugate associates with innate antiviral immune responses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.104 (35), 14050–14055. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0704014104
58
KangR.ZehH. J.LotzeM. T.TangD. (2011). The Beclin 1 network regulates autophagy and apoptosis. Cell Death Differ.18 (4), 571–580. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2010.191
59
KatoH.TakeuchiO.Mikamo-SatohE.HiraiR.KawaiT.MatsushitaK.et al. (2008). Length-dependent recognition of double-stranded ribonucleic acids by retinoic acid-inducible gene-I and melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5. J. Exp. Med.205 (7), 1601–1610. doi: 10.1084/jem.20080091
60
KatoH.TakeuchiO.SatoS.YoneyamaM.YamamotoM.MatsuiK.et al. (2006). Differential roles of MDA5 and RIG-I helicases in the recognition of RNA viruses. Nature.441 (7089), 101–105. doi: 10.1038/nature04734
61
KaushikS.CuervoA. M. (2018). The coming of age of chaperone-mediated autophagy. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.19 (6), 365–381. doi: 10.1038/s41580-018-0001-6
62
KhaminetsA.BehlC.DikicI. (2016). Ubiquitin-dependent and independent signals in selective autophagy. Trends Cell Biol.26 (1), 6–16. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2015.08.010
63
KimN.KimM. J.SungP. S.BaeY. C.ShinE. C.YooJ. Y. (2016). Interferon-inducible protein SCOTIN interferes with HCV replication through the autolysosomal degradation of NS5A. Nat. Commun.7, 10631. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10631
64
KimuraT.JainA.ChoiS. W.MandellM. A.SchroderK.JohansenT.et al. (2015). TRIM-mediated precision autophagy targets cytoplasmic regulators of innate immunity. J. Cell Biol.210 (6), 973–989. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201503023
65
KimuraT.JiaJ.Claude-TaupinA.KumarS.ChoiS. W.GuY.et al. (2017). Cellular and molecular mechanism for secretory autophagy. Autophagy.13 (6), 1084–1085. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2017.1307486
66
KirkinV.LamarkT.SouY. S.BjorkoyG.NunnJ. L.BruunJ. A.et al. (2009). A role for NBR1 in autophagosomal degradation of ubiquitinated substrates. Mol. Cell.33 (4), 505–516. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.01.020
67
KotaniT.KirisakoH.KoizumiM.OhsumiY.NakatogawaH. (2018). The Atg2-Atg18 complex tethers pre-autophagosomal membranes to the endoplasmic reticulum for autophagosome formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.115 (41), 10363–10368. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1806727115
68
LeiY.WenH.YuY.TaxmanD. J.ZhangL.WidmanD. G.et al. (2012). The mitochondrial proteins NLRX1 and TUFM form a complex that regulates type I interferon and autophagy. Immunity.36 (6), 933–946. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.03.025
69
LeibD. A.AlexanderD. E.CoxD.YinJ.FergusonT. A. (2009). Interaction of ICP34.5 with Beclin 1 modulates herpes simplex virus type 1 pathogenesis through control of CD4+ T-cell responses. J. Virol.83 (23), 12164–12171. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01676-09
70
LeidalA. M.LeeP. W.McCormickC. (2012). Viral subversion of autophagy impairs oncogene-induced senescence. Autophagy.8 (7), 1138–1140. doi: 10.4161/auto.20340
71
LevineB.KroemerG. (2008). Autophagy in the pathogenesis of disease. Cell. 132 (1), 27–42. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.12.018
72
LevineB.MizushimaN.VirginH. W. (2011). Autophagy in immunity and inflammation. Nature.469 (7330), 323–335. doi: 10.1038/nature09782
73
LiC.FuX.LinQ.LiuL.LiangH.HuangZ.et al. (2017). Autophagy promoted infectious kidney and spleen necrosis virus replication and decreased infectious virus yields in CPB cell line. Fish Shellfish Immunol.60, 25–32. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2016.11.037
74
LiX.HouP.MaW.WangX.WangH.YuZ.et al. (2022). SARS-CoV-2 ORF10 suppresses the antiviral innate immune response by degrading MAVS through mitophagy. Cell Mol. Immunol.19 (1), 67–78. doi: 10.1038/s41423-021-00807-4
75
LiJ.SongJ.KangL.HuangL.ZhouS.HuL.et al. (2021). pMGF505-7R determines pathogenicity of African swine fever virus infection by inhibiting IL-1beta and type I IFN production. PLoS Pathog.17 (7), e1009733. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009733
76
LiZ.TianX.JiX.WangJ.ChenH.WangD.et al. (2020). ULK1-ATG13 and their mitotic phospho-regulation by CDK1 connect autophagy to cell cycle. PLoS Biol.18 (6), e3000288. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000288
77
LiD.YangW.LiL.LiP.MaZ.ZhangJ.et al. (2021). African swine fever virus MGF-505-7R negatively regulates cGAS-STING-mediated signaling pathway. J. Immunol.206 (8), 1844–1857. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2001110
78
LianH.ZangR.WeiJ.YeW.HuM. M.ChenY. D.et al. (2018). The zinc-finger protein ZCCHC3 binds RNA and facilitates viral RNA sensing and activation of the RIG-I-like receptors. Immunity.49 (3), 438–448.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.08.014
79
LiangQ.LuoZ.ZengJ.ChenW.FooS. S.LeeS. A.et al. (2016). Zika virus NS4A and NS4B proteins deregulate Akt-mTOR signaling in human fetal neural stem cells to inhibit neurogenesis and induce autophagy. Cell Stem Cell.19 (5), 663–671. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2016.07.019
80
LiangQ.SeoG. J.ChoiY. J.KwakM. J.GeJ.RodgersM. A.et al. (2014). Crosstalk between the cGAS DNA sensor and Beclin-1 autophagy protein shapes innate antimicrobial immune responses. Cell Host Microbe15 (2), 228–238. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2014.01.009
81
LinY.WuC.WangX.LiuS.ZhaoK.KemperT.et al. (2020). Glucosamine promotes hepatitis B virus replication through its dual effects in suppressing autophagic degradation and inhibiting MTORC1 signaling. Autophagy.16 (3), 548–561. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2019.1632104
82
LiuD.WuH.WangC.LiY.TianH.SirajS.et al. (2019). STING directly activates autophagy to tune the innate immune response. Cell Death Differ.26 (9), 1735–1749. doi: 10.1038/s41418-018-0251-z
83
LiuW.ZhuangJ.JiangY.SunJ.PrinzR. A.SunJ.et al. (2019). Toll-like receptor signalling cross-activates the autophagic pathway to restrict Salmonella Typhimurium growth in macrophages. Cell Microbiol.21 (12), e13095. doi: 10.1111/cmi.13095
84
MaZ.BaiJ.JiangC.ZhuH.LiuD.PanM.et al. (2022). Tegument protein UL21 of alpha-herpesvirus inhibits the innate immunity by triggering CGAS degradation through TOLLIP-mediated selective autophagy. Autophagy.19 (5), 1512–1532. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2022.2139921
85
MadjoU.LeymarieO.FremontS.KusterA.NehlichM.Gallois-MontbrunS.et al. (2016). LC3C contributes to Vpu-mediated antagonism of BST2/Tetherin restriction on HIV-1 release through a non-canonical autophagy pathway. Cell Rep.17 (9), 2221–2233. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.10.045
86
ManciasJ. D.Pontano VaitesL.NissimS.BiancurD. E.KimA. J.WangX.et al. (2015). Ferritinophagy via NCOA4 is required for erythropoiesis and is regulated by iron dependent HERC2-mediated proteolysis. eLife. 4, e10308. doi: 10.7554/eLife.10308
87
MarshallR. S.HuaZ.MaliS.McLoughlinF.VierstraR. D. (2019). ATG8-binding UIM proteins define a new class of autophagy adaptors and receptors. Cell.177 (3), 766–781.e24. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.02.009
88
MartensS.BehrendsC. (2020). Molecular mechanisms of selective autophagy. J. Mol. Biol.432 (1), 1–2. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.11.010
89
MatsumotoG.WadaK.OkunoM.KurosawaM.NukinaN. (2011). Serine 403 phosphorylation of p62/SQSTM1 regulates selective autophagic clearance of ubiquitinated proteins. Mol. Cell.44 (2), 279–289. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.07.039
90
McKnightN. C.ZhenyuY. (2013). Beclin 1, an essential component and master regulator of PI3K-III in health and disease. Curr. Pathobiol Rep.1 (4), 231–238. doi: 10.1007/s40139-013-0028-5
91
MengW.GaoS. J. (2021). Targeting XPO1 enhances innate immune response and inhibits KSHV lytic replication during primary infection by nuclear stabilization of the p62 autophagy adaptor protein. Cell Death Dis.12 (1), 29. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-03303-1
92
MimC.UngerV. M. (2012). Membrane curvature and its generation by BAR proteins. Trends Biochem. Sci.37 (12), 526–533. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2012.09.001
93
MingS. L.ZhangS.WangQ.ZengL.ZhouL. Y.WangM. D.et al. (2022). Inhibition of USP14 influences alphaherpesvirus proliferation by degrading viral VP16 protein via ER stress-triggered selective autophagy. Autophagy.18 (8), 1801–1821. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2021.2002101
94
MiyakawaK.NishiM.OgawaM.MatsunagaS.SugiyamaM.NishitsujiH.et al. (2022). Galectin-9 restricts hepatitis B virus replication via p62/SQSTM1-mediated selective autophagy of viral core proteins. Nat. Commun.13 (1), 531. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28171-5
95
MizushimaN.YoshimoriT.OhsumiY. (2011). The role of Atg proteins in autophagosome formation. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.27, 107–132. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154005
96
MochidaK.NakatogawaH. (2022). ER-phagy: selective autophagy of the endoplasmic reticulum. EMBO Rep.23 (8), e55192. doi: 10.15252/embr.202255192
97
MounaL.HernandezE.BonteD.BrostR.AmazitL.DelguiL. R.et al. (2016). Analysis of the role of autophagy inhibition by two complementary human cytomegalovirus BECN1/Beclin 1-binding proteins. Autophagy.12 (2), 327–342. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2015.1125071
98
NakatogawaH.OhbayashiS.Sakoh-NakatogawaM.KakutaS.SuzukiS. W.KirisakoH.et al. (2012). The autophagy-related protein kinase Atg1 interacts with the ubiquitin-like protein Atg8 via the Atg8 family interacting motif to facilitate autophagosome formation. J. Biol. Chem.287 (34), 28503–28507. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C112.387514
99
NgW. C.KwekS. S.SunB.YousefiM.OngE. Z.TanH. C.et al. (2022). A fast-growing dengue virus mutant reveals a dual role of STING in response to infection. Open Biol.12 (12), 220227. doi: 10.1098/rsob.220227
100
NowagH.GuhlB.ThrieneK.RomaoS.ZieglerU.DengjelJ.et al. (2014). Macroautophagy proteins assist Epstein Barr virus production and get incorporated into the virus particles. EBioMedicine.1 (2-3), 116–125. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2014.11.007
101
OkuM.SakaiY. (2018). Three distinct Types of microautophagy based on membrane dynamics and molecular machineries. Bioessays.40 (6), e1800008. doi: 10.1002/bies.201800008
102
OrensteinS. J.CuervoA. M. (2010). Chaperone-mediated autophagy: molecular mechanisms and physiological relevance. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol.21 (7), 719–726. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2010.02.005
103
OrvedahlA.AlexanderD.TalloczyZ.SunQ.WeiY.ZhangW.et al. (2007). HSV-1 ICP34.5 confers neurovirulence by targeting the Beclin 1 autophagy protein. Cell Host Microbe1 (1), 23–35. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2006.12.001
104
OutliouaA.PourcelotM.ArnoultD. (2018). The role of optineurin in antiviral type I interferon production. Front. Immunol.9, 853. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00853
105
OzatoK.ShinD. M.ChangT. H.MorseH. C.3rd. (2008). TRIM family proteins and their emerging roles in innate immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol.8 (11), 849–860. doi: 10.1038/nri2413
106
PankivS.ClausenT. H.LamarkT.BrechA.BruunJ. A.OutzenH.et al. (2007). p62/SQSTM1 binds directly to Atg8/LC3 to facilitate degradation of ubiquitinated protein aggregates by autophagy. J. Biol. Chem.282 (33), 24131–24145. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M702824200
107
PapadopoulosC.KravicB.MeyerH. (2020). Repair or lysophagy: dealing with damaged lysosomes. J. Mol. Biol.432 (1), 231–239. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.08.010
108
PapandreouM. E.TavernarakisN. (2020). Nucleophagy mediators and mechanisms. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci.172, 1–14. doi: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2020.01.003
109
PaulP.MunzC. (2016). Autophagy and mammalian viruses: Roles in immune response, viral replication, and beyond. Adv. Virus Res.95, 149–195. doi: 10.1016/bs.aivir.2016.02.002
110
PonpuakM.MandellM. A.KimuraT.ChauhanS.CleyratC.DereticV. (2015). Secretory autophagy. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.35, 106–116. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2015.04.016
111
QianG.LiuD.HuJ.GanF.HouL.ChenX.et al. (2017). Ochratoxin A-induced autophagy in vitro and in vivo promotes porcine circovirus type 2 replication. Cell Death Dis.8 (6), e2909. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2017.303
112
QinY.LiuQ.TianS.XieW.CuiJ.WangR. F. (2016). TRIM9 short isoform preferentially promotes DNA and RNA virus-induced production of type I interferon by recruiting GSK3beta to TBK1. Cell Res.26 (5), 613–628. doi: 10.1038/cr.2016.27
113
RehwinkelJ.GackM. U. (2020). RIG-I-like receptors: their regulation and roles in RNA sensing. Nat. Rev. Immunol.20 (9), 537–551. doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-0288-3
114
RichterB.SliterD. A.HerhausL.StolzA.WangC.BeliP.et al. (2016). Phosphorylation of OPTN by TBK1 enhances its binding to Ub chains and promotes selective autophagy of damaged mitochondria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.113 (15), 4039–4044. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1523926113
115
RussellR. C.YuanH. X.GuanK. L. (2014). Autophagy regulation by nutrient signaling. Cell Res.24 (1), 42–57. doi: 10.1038/cr.2013.166
116
SantarelliR.ArteniA. M. B.Gilardini MontaniM. S.RomeoM. A.GaetaA.GonnellaR.et al. (2020). KSHV dysregulates bulk macroautophagy, mitophagy and UPR to promote endothelial to mesenchymal transition and CCL2 release, key events in viral-driven sarcomagenesis. Int. J. Cancer.147 (12), 3500–3510. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33163
117
SeamanM. N.MarcussonE. G.CereghinoJ. L.EmrS. D. (1997). Endosome to Golgi retrieval of the vacuolar protein sorting receptor, Vps10p, requires the function of the VPS29, VPS30, and VPS35 gene products. J. Cell Biol.137 (1), 79–92. doi: 10.1083/jcb.137.1.79
118
SinJ.McIntyreL.StotlandA.FeuerR.GottliebR. A. (2017). Coxsackievirus B escapes the infected cell in ejected mitophagosomes. J. Virol.91 (24), e01347-17. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01347-17
119
SinghR.KaushikS.WangY.XiangY.NovakI.KomatsuM.et al. (2009). Autophagy regulates lipid metabolism. Nature.458 (7242), 1131–1135. doi: 10.1038/nature07976
120
SlowickaK.VereeckeL.van LooG. (2016). Cellular functions of optineurin in health and disease. Trends Immunol.37 (9), 621–633. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2016.07.002
121
SparrerK. M. J.GableskeS.ZurenskiM. A.ParkerZ. M.FullF.BaumgartG. J.et al. (2017). TRIM23 mediates virus-induced autophagy via activation of TBK1. Nat. Microbiol.2 (11), 1543–1557. doi: 10.1038/s41564-017-0017-2
122
StolzA.ErnstA.DikicI. (2014). Cargo recognition and trafficking in selective autophagy. Nat. Cell Biol.16 (6), 495–501. doi: 10.1038/ncb2979
123
SunD.KongN.DongS.ChenX.QinW.WangH.et al. (2022). 2AB protein of Senecavirus A antagonizes selective autophagy and type I interferon production by degrading LC3 and MARCHF8. Autophagy.18 (8), 1969–1981. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2021.2015740
124
SunL.WuJ.DuF.ChenX.ChenZ. J. (2013). Cyclic GMP-AMP synthase is a cytosolic DNA sensor that activates the type I interferon pathway. Science.339 (6121), 786–791. doi: 10.1126/science.1232458
125
SunM.YuS.GeH.WangT.LiY.ZhouP.et al. (2022). The A137R protein of African swine fever virus inhibits type I interferon production via the autophagy-mediated lysosomal degradation of TBK1. J. Virol.96 (9), e0195721. doi: 10.1128/jvi.01957-21
126
SurviladzeZ.SterkR. T.DeHaroS. A.OzbunM. A. (2013). Cellular entry of human papillomavirus type 16 involves activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt/mTOR pathway and inhibition of autophagy. J. Virol.87 (5), 2508–2517. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02319-12
127
TakatsS.TothS.SzenciG.JuhaszG. (2019). Investigating non-selective autophagy in drosophila. Methods Mol. Biol.1880, 589–600. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8873-0_38
128
TalM. C.SasaiM.LeeH. K.YordyB.ShadelG. S.IwasakiA. (2009). Absence of autophagy results in reactive oxygen species-dependent amplification of RLR signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.106 (8), 2770–2775. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0807694106
129
TalloczyZ.JiangW.VirginH.LeibD. A.ScheunerD.KaufmanR. J.et al. (2002). Regulation of starvation- and virus-induced autophagy by the eIF2alpha kinase signaling pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.99 (1), 190–195. doi: 10.1073/pnas.012485299
130
TanT.XiaL. (2020). TRIM21 aggravates herpes simplex virus epithelial keratitis by attenuating STING-IRF3-mediated type I interferon signaling. Front. Microbiol.11, 703. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00703
131
TothR. P.AtkinJ. D. (2018). Dysfunction of optineurin in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and glaucoma. Front. Immunol.9, 1017. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01017
132
TsuboyamaK.Koyama-HondaI.SakamakiY.KoikeM.MorishitaH.MizushimaN. (2016). The ATG conjugation systems are important for degradation of the inner autophagosomal membrane. Science.354 (6315), 1036–1041. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf6136
133
UttenweilerA.MayerA. (2008). Microautophagy in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods Mol. Biol.445, 245–259. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-157-4_16
134
van der GreinS. G.DefournyK. A. Y.RabouwH. H.GalivetiC. R.LangereisM. A.WaubenM. H. M.et al. (2019). Picornavirus infection induces temporal release of multiple extracellular vesicle subsets that differ in molecular composition and infectious potential. PLoS Pathog.15 (2), e1007594. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007594
135
van der GreinS. G.DefournyK. A. Y.RabouwH. H.GoerdayalS. S.van HerwijnenM. J. C.WubboltsR. W.et al. (2022). The encephalomyocarditis virus leader promotes the release of virions inside extracellular vesicles via the induction of secretory autophagy. Nat. Commun.13 (1), 3625. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31181-y
136
van GentM.SparrerK. M. J.GackM. U. (2018). TRIM proteins and their roles in antiviral host defenses. Annu. Rev. Virol.5 (1), 385–405. doi: 10.1146/annurev-virology-092917-043323
137
VersteegG. A.BenkeS.Garcia-SastreA.RajsbaumR. (2014). InTRIMsic immunity: Positive and negative regulation of immune signaling by tripartite motif proteins. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev.25 (5), 563–576. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2014.08.001
138
VerstrepenL.VerhelstK.CarpentierI.BeyaertR. (2011). TAX1BP1, a ubiquitin-binding adaptor protein in innate immunity and beyond. Trends Biochem. Sci.36 (7), 347–354. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2011.03.004
139
ViretC.RozieresA.FaureM. (2018). Novel insights into NDP52 autophagy receptor functioning. Trends Cell Biol.28 (4), 255–257. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2018.01.003
140
WaisnerH.KalamvokiM. (2019). The ICP0 protein of herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) downregulates major autophagy adaptor proteins sequestosome 1 and optineurin during the early stages of HSV-1 infection. J. Virol.93 (21), e01258–e01219. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01258-19
141
WangZ.ChenJ.WuX.MaD.ZhangX.LiR.et al. (2021a). PCV2 targets cGAS to inhibit type I interferon induction to promote other DNA virus infection. PLoS Pathog.17 (9), e1009940. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009940
142
WangL.KlionskyD. J.ShenH. M. (2023). The emerging mechanisms and functions of microautophagy. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.24 (3), 186–203. doi: 10.1038/s41580-022-00529-z
143
WangY.SharmaP.JeffersonM.ZhangW.BoneB.KiparA.et al. (2021). Non-canonical autophagy functions of ATG16L1 in epithelial cells limit lethal infection by influenza A virus. EMBO J.40 (6), e105543. doi: 10.15252/embj.2020105543
144
WangX.WeiZ.ChengB.LiJ.HeY.LanT.et al. (2022). Endoplasmic reticulum stress promotes HBV production by enhancing use of the autophagosome/multivesicular body axis. Hepatology.75 (2), 438–454. doi: 10.1002/hep.32178
145
WangZ.YeX.ZhouY.WuX.HuR.ZhuJ.et al. (2021b). Bracoviruses recruit host integrases for their integration into caterpillar's genome. PLoS Genet.17 (9), e1009751. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009751
146
WangR.ZhuY.LinX.RenC.ZhaoJ.WangF.et al. (2019). Influenza M2 protein regulates MAVS-mediated signaling pathway through interacting with MAVS and increasing ROS production. Autophagy.15 (7), 1163–1181. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2019.1580089
147
WelschS.MillerS.Romero-BreyI.MerzA.BleckC. K.WaltherP.et al. (2009). Composition and three-dimensional architecture of the dengue virus replication and assembly sites. Cell Host Microbe5 (4), 365–375. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2009.03.007
148
WuJ.ChenZ. J. (2014). Innate immune sensing and signaling of cytosolic nucleic acids. Annu. Rev. Immunol.32, 461–488. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032713-120156
149
WuJ.SunL.ChenX.DuF.ShiH.ChenC.et al. (2013). Cyclic GMP-AMP is an endogenous second messenger in innate immune signaling by cytosolic DNA. Science.339 (6121), 826–830. doi: 10.1126/science.1229963
150
WuM.YingJ.LinX.XuC.ZhengX.ZhengY.et al. (2023). Toxoplasma gondii autophagy-related protein ATG7 maintains apicoplast inheritance by stabilizing and lipidating ATG8. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis.1870 (1), 166891. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2023.166891
151
XiaoY.CaiW. (2020). Autophagy and bacterial infection. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.1207, 413–423. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-4272-5_29
152
XieW.TianS.YangJ.CaiS.JinS.ZhouT.et al. (2022). OTUD7B deubiquitinates SQSTM1/p62 and promotes IRF3 degradation to regulate antiviral immunity. Autophagy.18 (10), 2288–2302. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2022.2026098
153
YanC.GongL.ChenL.XuM.Abou-HamdanH.TangM.et al. (2020). PHB2 (prohibitin 2) promotes PINK1-PRKN/Parkin-dependent mitophagy by the PARL-PGAM5-PINK1 axis. Autophagy.16 (3), 419–434. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2019.1628520
154
YaoW.LiY.ChenY.ChenY.XieY.YeM.et al. (2023). Atg1-mediated Atg11 phosphorylation is required for selective autophagy by regulating its association with receptor proteins. Autophagy.19 (1), 180–188. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2022.2063494
155
YaoW.LiY.WuL.WuC.ZhangY.LiuJ.et al. (2020). Atg11 is required for initiation of glucose starvation-induced autophagy. Autophagy.16 (12), 2206–2218. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2020.1719724
156
Yla-AnttilaP.GuptaS.MasucciM. G. (2021). The Epstein-Barr virus deubiquitinase BPLF1 targets SQSTM1/p62 to inhibit selective autophagy. Autophagy.17 (11), 3461–3474. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2021.1874660
157
YoneyamaM.KikuchiM.MatsumotoK.ImaizumiT.MiyagishiM.TairaK.et al. (2005). Shared and unique functions of the DExD/H-box helicases RIG-I, MDA5, and LGP2 in antiviral innate immunity. J. Immunol.175 (5), 2851–2858. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.5.2851
158
YoneyamaM.OnomotoK.JogiM.AkaboshiT.FujitaT. (2015). Viral RNA detection by RIG-I-like receptors. Curr. Opin. Immunol.32, 48–53. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2014.12.012
159
ZhangX.MingY.FuX.NiuY.LinQ.LiangH.et al. (2022a). PI3K/AKT/p53 pathway inhibits infectious spleen and kidney necrosis virus infection by regulating autophagy and immune responses. Fish Shellfish Immunol.120, 648–657. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2021.12.046
160
ZhangJ.NeyP. A. (2009). Role of BNIP3 and NIX in cell death, autophagy, and mitophagy. Cell Death Differ.16 (7), 939–946. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2009.16
161
ZhangX.ZengW.ZhangY.YuQ.ZengM.GanJ.et al. (2022b). Focus on the role of mitochondria in NLRP3 inflammasome activation: A prospective target for the treatment of ischemic stroke (Review). Int. J. Mol. Med.49 (6), 74. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2022.5130
162
ZhangY.SunH.PeiR.MaoB.ZhaoZ.LiH.et al. (2021). The SARS-CoV-2 protein ORF3a inhibits fusion of autophagosomes with lysosomes. Cell Discov.7 (1), 31. doi: 10.1038/s41421-021-00268-z
163
ZhaoH.TangM.LiuM.ChenL. (2018). Glycophagy: An emerging target in pathology. Clin. Chim. Acta.484, 298–303. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2018.06.014
164
ZhaoM.WangF.WuJ.ChengY.CaoY.WuX.et al. (2021). CGAS is a micronucleophagy receptor for the clearance of micronuclei. Autophagy.17 (12), 3976–3991. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2021.1899440
165
ZhengJ.ChenX.LiuQ.ZhongG.ZhuangM. (2022). Ubiquitin ligase MARCH5 localizes to peroxisomes to regulate pexophagy. J. Cell Biol.221 (1), e202103156. doi: 10.1083/jcb.202103156
166
ZhengZ. Q.FuY. Z.WangS. Y.XuZ. S.ZouH. M.WangY. Y. (2022). Herpes simplex virus protein UL56 inhibits cGAS-Mediated DNA sensing to evade antiviral immunity. Cell Insight.1 (2), 100014. doi: 10.1016/j.cellin.2022.100014
167
ZhongY.WangQ. J.LiX.YanY.BackerJ. M.ChaitB. T.et al. (2009). Distinct regulation of autophagic activity by Atg14L and Rubicon associated with Beclin 1-phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase complex. Nat. Cell Biol.11 (4), 468–476. doi: 10.1038/ncb1854
168
ZhouZ.JiangX.LiuD.FanZ.HuX.YanJ.et al. (2009). Autophagy is involved in influenza A virus replication. Autophagy.5 (3), 321–328. doi: 10.4161/auto.5.3.7406
169
ZhouZ.LiuJ.FuT.WuP.PengC.GongX.et al. (2021). Phosphorylation regulates the binding of autophagy receptors to FIP200 Claw domain for selective autophagy initiation. Nat. Commun.12 (1), 1570. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21874-1
170
ZhuG.WuC. J.ZhaoY.AshwellJ. D. (2007). Optineurin negatively regulates TNFalpha- induced NF-kappaB activation by competing with NEMO for ubiquitinated RIP. Curr. Biol.17 (16), 1438–1443. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.07.041
171
ZhuB.ZhouY.XuF.ShuaiJ.LiX.FangW. (2012). Porcine circovirus type 2 induces autophagy via the AMPK/ERK/TSC2/mTOR signaling pathway in PK-15 cells. J. Virol.86 (22), 12003–12012. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01434-12
Summary
Keywords
autophagy, viruses, interferons, viral infection, viral replication
Citation
Zhai H, Wang T, Liu D, Pan L, Sun Y and Qiu H-J (2023) Autophagy as a dual-faced host response to viral infections. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 13:1289170. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1289170
Received
05 September 2023
Accepted
10 November 2023
Published
06 December 2023
Volume
13 - 2023
Edited by
Li-Chiu Wang, I-Shou University, Taiwan
Reviewed by
Mario Mauthe, University Medical Center Groningen, Netherlands; Luciana Jesus Da Costa, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Updates
Copyright
© 2023 Zhai, Wang, Liu, Pan, Sun and Qiu.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Hua-Ji Qiu, qiuhuaji@caas.cn; Yuan Sun, sunyuan@caas.cn
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.