CORRECTION article

Front. Educ., 29 November 2023

Sec. Special Educational Needs

Volume 8 - 2023 | https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1331867

Corrigendum: Beliefs and attitudes toward inclusion of student teachers and their contact with people with disabilities

  • 1. Centre for Inclusion and Health in Schools, Zurich University for Teacher Education, Zurich, Switzerland

  • 2. School of Education, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, Windisch, Switzerland

Article metrics

View details

837

Views

308

Downloads

In the published article, there was an error in Table 1 as published. In Table 1, the values (N, M, SD) at measurement time t0 for the three subscales of EFI-L had been incorrectly copied in. The corrected Table 1 and its caption appear below.

Table 1

Scales t0/t1Rating scaleN t0M t0SD t0N t1M t1SD t1
Efficacy for student engagement1–94416.310.864426.460.84
Efficacy for classroom management1–94436.520.944436.620.88
SACIE-R sentiments1–44411.940.524411.930.51
SACIE-R attitudes1–44432.950.524413.050.53
SACIE-R concerns1–44422.640.584422.750.62
TEIP efficacy in using inclusive instructions1–64334.550.524254.640.55
TEIP efficacy in collaboration1–64114.510.744064.550.71
TEIP efficacy in managing behavior1–64344.520.564274.530.57
EFI-L performance-related support in inclusive settings1–64163.760.764123.930.75
EFI-L personal willingness and ability for inclusive teaching1–64173.890.964113.830.99
EFI-L social inclusion in the classroom1–64204.470.764104.560.80

Mean values of the relevant scales at the time of measurement t0 and t1 (N = 443).

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Statements

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Summary

Keywords

attitudes, contact, inclusion, teaching, teacher education

Citation

Kunz A, Luder R and Kassis W (2023) Corrigendum: Beliefs and attitudes toward inclusion of student teachers and their contact with people with disabilities. Front. Educ. 8:1331867. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2023.1331867

Received

01 November 2023

Accepted

14 November 2023

Published

29 November 2023

Volume

8 - 2023

Edited and reviewed by

Geoff Anthony Lindsay, University of Warwick, United Kingdom

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: André Kunz

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics