In the published article, Table 6 was mistakenly not included in the publication. The missing material appears below:
Table 6
| Parameter | Peer rejection networks | |
| Est. | SE | |
| Aggression dynamics | ||
| Linear shape | −0.24 | 0.19 |
| Quadratic shape | 0.41*** | 0.11 |
| Indegree effect | −0.11 | 0.07 |
| Outdegree effect | 0.11* | 0.05 |
| Total alter aggression | 0.15 | 0.10 |
| Effect from gender | 0.40* | 0.16 |
| Effect from abuse experience | 0.13 | 0.17 |
| Effect from violence acceptance | 0.30** | 0.11 |
Average parameter estimates for aggression dynamics.
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001; all convergence t ratios < 0.1; overall maximum convergence ratio 0.21.
In the published article, there was an error. The text refers to the wrong table. A correction has been made to Results, Descriptives, Paragraph 1. This sentence previously stated:
“Table 1 presents the descriptive statistics, including the means and standard deviations, of the variables used in this study.”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“Table 2 presents the descriptive statistics, including the means and standard deviations, of the variables used in this study.”
In the published article, there was an error. The text refers to the wrong table. A correction has been made to Results, Descriptives, Paragraph 2. This sentence previously stated:
“Table 2 shows the correlations between the variables used.”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“Table 3 shows the correlations between the variables used.”
In the published article, there was an error. The text refers to the wrong table. A correction has been made to Results, Descriptives, Paragraph 3. This sentence previously stated:
“Table 3 provides information about the rejection networks, among them the average number of classmates rejected by each student (2.02) and the average degree of the rejection networks per measurement point (2.07 at Wave 1; 1.97 at Wave 2).”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“Table 4 provides information about the rejection networks, among them the average number of classmates rejected by each student (2.02) and the average degree of the rejection networks per measurement point (2.07 at Wave 1; 1.97 at Wave 2).”
In the published article, there was an error. The text refers to the wrong table. A correction has been made to Results, Rejection dynamics: network effects. This sentence previously stated:
“The average parameter estimates for rejection dynamics is presented in the first part of Table 4.”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“The average parameter estimates for rejection dynamics is presented in the first part of Table 5.”
In the published article, there was an error. The text refers to the wrong table. A correction has been made to Results, Rejection dynamics: selection effects. This sentence previously stated:
“The first part of Table 4 also describes characteristics of adolescents and selection effects that influence changes in rejection networks.”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“The first part of Table 5 also describes characteristics of adolescents and selection effects that influence changes in rejection networks.”
In the published article, there was an error. The text refers to the wrong table. A correction has been made to Results, Aggression dynamics. This sentence previously stated:
“Table 5 shows the average parameter estimates for the behavior variable aggression to answer R3.”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“Table 6 shows the average parameter estimates for the behavior variable aggression to answer R3.”
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Statements
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Summary
Keywords
peer rejection, aggression, physical abuse, violence acceptance, social networks
Citation
Favre CA, Garrote A, Kassis W, Bacher J, Wullschleger A and Aksoy D (2024) Corrigendum: The cycle of violence: effects of violence experience, behavior, and attitudes on adolescents' peer rejection networks. Front. Educ. 9:1444361. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1444361
Received
05 June 2024
Accepted
11 July 2024
Published
18 September 2024
Volume
9 - 2024
Edited and reviewed by
Douglas F. Kauffman, Consultant, Boston, MA, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2024 Favre, Garrote, Kassis, Bacher, Wullschleger and Aksoy.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Céline A. Favre celineanne.favre@fhnw.ch
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.