A novel grid-connected microgrid energy management system with optimal sizing using hybrid grey wolf and cuckoo search optimization algorithm

Abstract

Renewable energy systems, particularly in countries with limited fossil fuel resources, are promising and environmentally sustainable sources of electricity generation. Wind, solar Photovoltaic (PV), and biomass gasifier-based systems have gotten much attention recently for providing electricity to energy-deficient areas. However, due to the intermittent nature of renewable energy, a completely renewable system is unreliable and may cause operation problems. Energy storage systems and volatile generation sources are the best way to combat the problem. This paper proposes a hybrid grid-connected wind-solar PV generation Microgrid (MG) with biomass and energy storage devices to meet the entire value of load demand for the adopted buildings in an intended region and ensure economic dispatch as well as make a trade in the electricity field by supplying/receiving energy to/from the utility grid. The control operation plan uses battery storage units to compensate energy gap if the priority resources (wind turbine and solar PV) are incapable of meeting demand. Additionally, the biomass gasifier is used as a fallback option if the batteries fail to perform their duty. At any time, any excess of energy can be utilized to charge the batteries and sell the rest to the utility. Additionally, if the adopted resources are insufficient to meet the demand, the required energy is acquired from the utility. A Hybrid Grey Wolf with Cuckoo Search Optimization (GWCSO) algorithm is adopted for achieving optimal sizing of the proposed grid-connected MG. To assess the proposed technique’s robustness, the results are compared to those obtained using the Grey Wolf Optimization (GWO) algorithm. The GWCSO method yielded a lower total number of component units, annual cost, total Net Present Cost (NPC), and Levelized Cost Of Energy (LCOE) than the GWO algorithm, whereas the GWCSO algorithm has the lowest deviation, indicating that it is more accurate and robust than the GWO algorithm.

1 Introduction

Renewable-based hybrid energy systems have gained traction recently as environmental concerns, energy demand, fuel prices, and fossil fuel depletion have increased (Alhasnawi et al., 2021a; Alhasnawi et al., 2021b; Alhasnawi et al., 2021c). Increased energy consumption by a specific region’s buildings and households during peak demand necessitates the operation of extra generation units, which consumes a lot of fuel and raises the cost of electricity. Because wind and solar energy have relatively low marginal costs (fuel is not required), increasing the supply of renewable energy tends to decrease the average price per unit of electrical energy. Thus, renewable energy substantially reduces the overall amount of expensive electricity to fulfil the load’s energy and ensure “economic dispatch”. In a renewable energy-based system, it is critical to integrate wind energy with solar PV because solar energy cannot be adopted at night or in cloudy conditions, whereas wind energy can be used even at night. In addition, wind energy is more efficient than solar energy. Wind turbines emit a lower amount of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Many studies have been done to determine whether wind-powered systems are viable and how large they should be to maximize their efficiency (Abouzahr and Ramakumar, 1990; Elhadidy and Shaahid, 1999; Elhadidy and Shaahid, 2004).

The major disadvantages of solar energy are its stochastic nature, which raises concerns about the user’s power reliability. As a result, the hybridization of wind and solar energy is a viable option for increasing reliability (the strength of another can compensate for weakness). However, it adds to the complexity of the system (Yang et al., 2008). Due to the unpredictable nature of both wind and solar resources, a standalone solar-wind energy system is limited in its ability to operate without the use of backup power. In the case of an autonomous hybrid system, backup is typically provided by a diesel generator or energy storage devices such as batteries or ultra-capacitors. Using a diesel generator in a hybrid system increases both the cost and the environmental impact. Fortunately, as technology advances, other renewable energy sources such as biogas, biomass, micro-hydro, and fuel cells have been integrated alongside solar and wind energy (Patil et al., 2010). Among the renewable energy sources mentioned previously, biomass appears to be the more viable option, particularly in agriculturally rich countries. Biomass can be converted into a variety of different products, including heat, electricity, and biofuels (Singh et al., 2008). Due to advancements in biomass gasification technology, biomass gasifier-generated electricity is gaining popularity, particularly in rural areas. Biomass power plants have a high load factor and are economically viable (Patil et al., 2011).

According to an earlier discussion, grid-connected and standalone MG adopting wind-PV-biomass for electricity generation, with or without storage devices, is a viable and cost-effective option, especially in developing countries (Bhattacharjee and Dey, 2014; Singh and Kaushik, 2016a). As a result, using renewable energy sources to generate electricity in MG system can allow for grid reconnection in the event of inadequate energy and also provide extra energy to the utility. In the case of hybrid systems, various factors such as the system’s total cost or the size and capacity of renewable energy sources play a significant role. Sizing determines the MG’s resource coordination, proper system configuration, and the component’s capacity to meet the load demand. In the interim, optimization is necessary to ensure that the system operates more efficiently, maximizing economic benefit while minimizing energy consumption, pollutants, and other objectives. Sizing and optimization are interdependent and mutually supportive. This is essential for resolving oversizing and under sizing issues to improve supply reliability. Two critical parameters, the cost of generating energy and the system’s reliability, present significant challenges in hybrid systems. A well-designed system should make the best component selection possible while still ensuring the system’s reliability (Nehrir et al., 2011).

There is little existing literature incorporating wind, PV, and biomass hybrid MG systems with energy storage. The authors in (Akram et al., 2018) proposed two constraint-based iterative search algorithms for optimal sizing of wind turbines, solar PV, and battery energy storage systems in a grid-connected MG. The first algorithm, called source sizing, determines optimal Renewable Energy Resource (RER) sizes, while the second, called battery sizing, determines optimal Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) capacity. Borowy and Salameh (1996) introduced the Loss of Load Probability (LLP) concept for sizing a battery bank and a PV array in a hybrid wind and PV system by building the curve representing the relationship between PV modules and batteries reduces the system cost. Kaabeche et al. (2011) used iterative optimization to follow the Deficiency of Power Supply Probability (DPSP) and the Levelised Cost of Energy (LCE). Belmili et al. (2014) used Loss of Power Supply Probability (LPSP) technique to develop a techno-economic algorithm able to determine the system that would guarantee a reliable energy supply with the least investment. Nacer et al. (2015) described a novel approach for sizing grid-connected hybrid renewable energy systems that include photovoltaic and wind turbines but do not include storage devices or biomass gasifiers. The hybrid system is used to generate environmentally friendly self-consumed energy. Unmet load demand is purchased from the grid, ensuring the system’s reliability at all times. Unlike standalone systems, surplus energy is injected into the grid at a prime rate determined by local policy, reducing the grid-connected system’s cost. Singh and Kaushik (2016b) investigated the sizing problem for grid-connected and off-grid photovoltaic/biomass hybrid systems. The results indicate that grid-connected systems outperform off-grid systems. Wang and Xu Wang et al. (2018) determined the optimal size for a grid-connected photovoltaic/wind/battery hybrid system. The results indicate that grid connectivity is economically advantageous. Abushnaf and Rassau (2018) determined the optimal size of a grid-connected photovoltaic/battery hybrid system and selected a number of photovoltaic panels, batteries, and inverters as decision variables. Cingoz and Sozer Badawy et al. (2016) pinpointed battery storage sizing for a grid-connected photovoltaic/battery hybrid system for various scenarios and the optimal size was derived for each scenario. The optimal size for a PV/wind/battery hybrid system was set in (Nadjemi et al., 2017), and the results indicate that the cost of the system is significantly influenced by the initial cost of the PV and the selling price of renewable electricity. Zhang et al. (2017) explored the sizing and operation of a photovoltaic/battery hybrid system. The results indicate that battery usage is not advantageous with commonly used operation methods. Using the Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithms presented in (Gonzalez et al., 2015), a grid-connected solar PV and wind turbine system has been designed. The results indicated that feeding the load demand could minimize the energy cost. Using the algorithms of GA, firefly algorithm, and GWO, (Biswas and Kumar, 2017), presented a techno-economic analysis of a standalone hybrid system incorporating hybrid pumped and battery energy storage with PV. Considering the case study for feeding a low load, the GWO is capable of minimizing the energy cost of the system. GA has been used to optimize the design of a hybrid energy system for minimizing environmental impacts in an agricultural case study (Kaab et al., 2019) to increase energy-use efficiency. 9ndividual optimization algorithms are used to size and optimize the energy systems to reduce costs (Ahmed et al., 2022). In this article, a PV plant with fuel cell (FC) and battery storage devices has been configured as a standalone MG to supply a nuclear power plant emergency loads. This paper applies and compares the optimization algorithms of bat optimization (BAT), equilibrium optimizer (EQ), and black-hole-based optimization (BHB). The authors of reference (Kyriakarakos et al., 2015) discussed the design and research of decentralized systems for energy management for an autonomous polygeneration MG in a remote area. This was designed to meet the needs of a remote area, such as providing electricity, heating and cooling for buildings, and drinkable water. With the decentralized energy-management system, each component of the MG can be controlled individually. The system design was based on a multi-agent scheme and was implemented using Fuzzy Cognitive Maps. In order to model the strategy exchange between two players/agents as a non-cooperative power management game or a cooperative one, depending on the level of the energy generated by the renewable electricity sources and the energy stored in the battery bank, the energy management problem was formulated through the application of game theory (Karavas et al., 2017). This was done to achieve optimal energy controlling and managing of the MG operation.

The organization of this paper is divided up into five sections. Section 2 discusses the mathematical modeling of the various components. Section 3 provides a formulation of the problem, an operational strategy, and a brief introduction to the adopted algorithm. In Section 4, the simulation results are illustrated. Section 6 concludes the paper.

2 Proposed system mathematical modeling

This work focuses on developing a hybrid system capable of meeting the demand profile for Residential Loads (RL), Commercial Loads (CL), and Industrial Loads (IL) by supplying reliable power to the grid-connected area. The proposed microgrid’s various components are depicted in Figure 1.

FIGURE 1

As illustrated in Figure 1, the AC bus connects the AC loads, wind turbines, and biomass gasifiers. Solar PV panels and batteries are connected to the AC bus via the bidirectional converter. Additionally, a charge controller is used to ensure the smooth flow of power and to regulate the charging and discharging rates of the batteries. The proposed system will aid in reducing reliance on the utility grid through the use of renewable energy sources. The storage devices are used to manage the energy generated by wind, solar, and biomass. The battery banks are adopted here to optimize power distribution, which reduces the intermittency of renewable energy sources. In addition to the energy management strategy, the system under this work focuses on the optimal sizing of each component while maintaining the system’s reliability. The following subsections discuss the mathematical models for various components.

2.1 Solar photovoltaic panel

According to (Ahmad and Enayatzare, 2018; Ramli et al., 2018), the following equation incorporates all important parameters that influence the PV output, such as temperature and solar radiation. The power output of a solar photovoltaic () panel can be expressed as,In this equation, denotes the nominal power of PV under standard test conditions, denotes solar radiation (watts per square meter), = 1 kW/m² denotes reference solar radiation, and is the coefficient of power at different temperatures. stands for ambient temperature, is the nominal operation temperature, while = 25°C is the reference temperature under standard conditions.

2.2 Wind turbine power generation

The amount of energy produced by a wind turbine () can be calculated as follows:where denotes the rating of a single wind turbine, represents the cut-in speed, denotes the rated wind speed, acts the cut-out speed, and denotes the desired reference height wind speed. Wind speed at hub height varies according to site and geographical location and is not identical to reference height. Additionally, it is expressed as,where represents the wind speed at height (), represents the wind speed at the reference height , and denotes the friction coefficient. The friction coefficient is typically 1/7 for smooth surfaces and well-exposed locations (Malheiro et al., 2015; Wu et al., 2015; Singh et al., 2016).

2.3 Biomass gasifier

Biomass gasification technology converts solid bio-residue into a gaseous fuel that is then used to generate electricity. The producer gas is produced during partial combustion and is a combustible gas composed of H₂ (20%), CO (20%), CH₄ (1–2%), and inert gases. The producer gas is used as an input fuel in the case of a biomass gasifier. The annual electricity output () of a biomass gasifier can be calculated as follows:where denotes the system’s rating power and denotes the capacity utilization factor. In the case of a biomass-based energy system, a few parameters such as the calorific value of the biomass, its availability , and the hours of operation of the biomass gasifier all play a significant role. The maximum rating for a biomass gasifier installed in a specific area is as follows:where denotes the overall efficiency of biomass to electricity conversion and denotes the calorific value of the biomass (Nouni et al., 2007; Gupta et al., 2010; Singh et al., 2016).

2.4 Battery bank

Batteries can be used in hybrid renewable energy systems to store excess energy and to discharge it when renewable energy sources are unavailable or insufficient. Energy measurement is possible with the proper estimation of the state of charge (SOC). The SOC of a battery is a function of time and can be calculated as follows (Singh et al., 2016):where is the bus voltage, is the battery’s input/output power, and is the battery’s round trip efficiency. If is positive, the battery is charging; if it is negative, the battery is discharging. Additionally, a battery’s round-trip efficiency is defined as follows:where and denote the battery’s charging and discharging efficiency, respectively (Nouni et al., 2007; National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2022). The battery bank’s round-trip efficiency is estimated to be 92 percent. Additionally, charging and discharging efficiencies are assumed to differ, at 85 percent and 100 percent, respectively. SOC_max is the maximum state of charge and is equal to the battery bank’s aggregate capacity (). It is expressed as follows:where denotes the capacity of a single battery, denotes the total number of batteries, and denotes the number of series-connected batteries. The battery bank cannot be discharged below a specified minimum state of charge, referred to as SOC_min. This limit can be used as a system constraint depending on the battery bank’s usage.

Batteries are connected in series to achieve the desired bus voltage. The series connection of batteries can be calculated as,where is the single battery’s voltage.

Another critical factor to consider when modeling batteries is the highest (maximum) charge or discharge power available at any given time. It is proportional to the maximum charge current and is calculated using the following equation:where denotes the maximum charging current of the battery in amps.

2.5 Power converter

A power converter must be used if there are both AC and DC elements in the system. Solar PV and batteries produce DC output, whereas the considered load is AC. The size of the converter is determined by the peak power of demand (). The inverter rating () is figured out as shown in Eq. 1 (Singh et al., 2016).where stands for the efficiency of the inverter.

3 Problem formulation

This research developed a grid-connected hybrid energy system with both cost-effectiveness and reliability in operation. The rating and sizing of solar PV panels, wind turbines, battery banks, and biomass gasifiers are among the most important decision factors. The operational strategy of the system, the objective function and constraints, and a brief introduction to the algorithm, that has been used, are all discussed in this section.

3.1 Operational strategy

FIGURE 2

3.1.1 Charging function

3.1.2 Discharging function

3.2 Constraints and objective functions

This study minimizes the proposed hybrid system’s total NPC while maintaining an optimal energy flow. For optimal configuration, four major decision factors were chosen: the number of wind turbines, solar photovoltaic panels, batteries, and biomass gasifier rating. Economic analysis is conducted using the system Annualized Cost (ANC), NPC, and LCOE concepts. When all other constraints and parameters are satisfied, the solution with the lowest values of them is evidenced to be the optimal one. The objective function of the total system cost contains of three components: (i) replacement cost, (ii) total capital cost, and (iii) operational and maintenance cost. Installation and civil works costs are included in the component’s capital costs. The following function is taken as the primary objective function that must be minimized within specified constraints (Singh et al., 2016): Minimize ANCWhere are the cost of wind turbine (per kW), solar PV panel (per kW), inverter (per kW) and battery (per unit) respectively. The cost of the biomass gasifier (per kW) is denoted by, and the rating of the biomass gasifier is denoted by . is the inverter’s rating. are the total units number of wind turbines, solar PV panel and batteries.

The capital and installation costs (), replacement costs (), annual maintenance costs (), operation costs (), and salvage costs are all included in the ANC of the installed component. Additionally, the total ANC value for each component can be expressed as follows:With the help of a factor known as the Capacity Recovery Factor (CRF), it is possible to calculate the annualized cost of any component. The CRF (Eq. 18) can be used to compute the present value of money:where is the number of years in the lifetime and is the yearly interest rate. The objective function is minimized while enforcing a number of constraints, which can be summarized as follows:The maximum number of solar PV panels is represented by , the maximum number of batteries is represented by , the maximum number of wind turbines is represented by , and the maximum rating of biomass gasifier is represented by .

The most cost-effective and reliable configuration is chosen based on the LCOE and reliability. The LCOE is defined as the average price per kWh of useful energy generated by the system:

Table 1 shows all the technical and economic parameters associated with the components used in the proposed MG. Several papers were considered during for the purpose of parametrization, while the most proper were selected (Shakti et al., 2016; Karavas et al., 2019).

3.3 Hybrid grey wolf optimization and cuckoo search algorithm

3.3.1 Overview

Recently, hybridizing two or more algorithms has gained popularity as a method of identifying superior solutions to optimization problems. The incorporation into hybrid optimized algorithms of many well-known optimization techniques has made them more efficient in dealing with the issues.

The GWO algorithm simulates the hunting mechanism and leadership hierarchy of grey wolves. Grey wolves typically live in groups in the wild. The group consists of four distinct species of wolves. The group’s leader wolf is referred to as alpha (α), and it is located at the top of the pyramid. While the alpha may not be the strongest wolf in the pack, it must be the best leader. It is in charge of making critical group decisions, such as predation behavior and food distribution. Beta (β) is located on the second floor of the pyramid and serves as an alpha assistant, assisting alpha in managing the group. It needs only respect the alpha to be able to command others. The third level wolf is delta (δ), which must follow alpha and beta’s instructions. When alpha and beta reach the end of their useful lives, they are downgraded to delta. The base of the pyramid is referred to as omega (ω). Omega must submit to the rest of the group (Karavas et al., 2019 and Mahmoud et al., 2020).

GWO and cuckoo search (CS) are two popular meta-heuristic algorithms. Nevertheless, their search mechanisms are distinct. GWO is inspired by the hunting behavior of grey wolves and utilizes three types of wolves to search the solution space: the alpha wolf, the beta wolf, and the delta wolf. CS is influenced by the obligatory brood parasitic behavior of cuckoo and utilizes Lévy flight to generate novel solutions. Numerous studies revealed that GWO excels at exploitation (Long et al., 2018; Gupta and Deep, 2019; Saxena et al., 2019), whereas CS is more interested in global exploration (Mlakar et al., 2016). The GWO algorithm has been used in this work to determine the optimal size of the proposed system components, thereby lowering the system’s cost and meeting load demand. When GWO inspects an individual with a high fitness value, a weak global search ability occurs, allowing to fall into the local optimum more easily. A Cuckoo Search Algorithm (CSA) updates the nest’s position with a probability that is independent of the search path and in random directions. As a result, it is much easier to jump from one region to another. Thus, CSA is an extremely beneficial tool and can be adopted to improve GWO. In this paper, CSA has been implicitly employed in the GWO algorithm to update the positions of existing search agents and generate a new set. The new hybrid GWCSO is powerful and can quickly solve optimization problems by extracting the sizing units of solar PV, wind turbine, storage batteries, and biomass gasifier in a grid-connected MG. In this regard, the position updated equation of CSA is used to modify the positions, speeds and convergence accuracies of the grey wolf agent. The flowchart of GWO in conjunction with CSA is depicted in Figure 3.

FIGURE 3

3.3.2 Mathematical model of grey wolf optimization

The fitness function determines the level of the grey. According to the fitness value, the alpha wolf, beta wolf, and delta wolf are the best fitness solutions. These three solutions are denoted as the key-group. Omega wolf is responsible for the remaining wolves. Grey wolves’ social hierarchy and hunting technique are mathematically modelled in order to create GWO and optimize it. The following mathematical models are proposed for the social hierarchy, encircling, hunting and attacking prey (Xu et al., 2017; Alhasnawi et al., 2021d):

3.3.2.1 Encircling prey

During the hunt, grey wolves encircle their prey. The following equations are presented to mathematically model encircling behavior:

Where denotes the next iteration in these two equations, denotes the position of a single wolf. denotes the prey’s position, while and denote the coefficient vectors. The following equations model the calculation method

Where and are random integers between 0 and 1. Vector is set to a value between 2 and 0, which causes the number of iterations to decrease linearly during the iterative procedure.

3.3.2.2 Hunting prey

When the wolf group locates prey, the alpha wolf, beta wolf, and delta wolf lead the wolf group in encircling the prey. Assume they are aware of the prey’s location. Thus, creating a key group from the best three solutions obtained thus far and updating the position of each wolf in the group according to the key group. The following equations are used to update the position.Where , , and denote the top three solutions obtained thus far during the iterative procedure, which constitute the key group. The following equations define additional parameters

3.3.2.3 Attacking prey

Grey wolves typically attack their prey when it comes to a halt. Thus, the following equation describes the behavior of grey wolves as they approach their prey.Where is an integer value between 0 and Max that represents the number of times the present algorithm has run (max number of iteration).

3.3.3 Improving in grey wolf optimization algorithm

Following these three rules, the nests are updated during iteration by following the next equations.

In the CS operation, a population, from the standpoint of implementation,, of individuals is evolved from a starting point () to a total number of iterations (gen). Each individual () is an n-dimensional vector with the dimensions each corresponding to a decision variable in the optimization problem to be solved. The quality of each individual, (candidate solution), is determined using an objective function, ), whose final result represents 's fitness value. Through use of Levy flights to produce new candidate solutions is one of the most advanced features of cuckoo search. A new candidate solution, is generated by perturbing the current with a position change. To obtain , a symmetric Levy distribution generates a random step, . Mantegna’s algorithm is used to generate (Mantegna, 1994; Cuevas and Reyna-Orta, 2014):Where and both n-dimensional vectors with a dimension of 3/2. Each component of and is calculated using the normal distributions described below (Cuevas and Reyna-Orta, 2014):where the gamma distribution is denoted by . After calculating , the required change in position is calculated as follows:where the product is entry-wise multiplications and denotes the best solution that has been observed thus far in terms of fitness value. Finally, the new candidate solution, , is determined through the use of Eq. 41

As a result, the CS algorithm can efficiently search the solution space because its step changes with small distance detection and occasional long distance walking, and the step length is much longer in the long run (Cai et al., 2003). Figure 4 presents the pseudocodes representation of the GWO and GWCSO algorithm.

FIGURE 4

4 Simulation results

The adopted total load profile for (CL, RL, and IL) to determine the optimal size of system components and to conduct energy management analysis is depicted in Figure 5, where (a) shows annual load profile and (b) shows daily load profile. The annual solar irradiance, ambient temperature and wind speed of Basrah city, Iraq are adopted as an annual input weather data as shown in Figures 6A–C respectively.

FIGURE 5

FIGURE 6

4.1 Optimal sizing results

The optimal findings include the total number of wind turbines, solar PV panels, batteries, and the maximum rating of a gasifier. The most viable and optimal option is ranked according to the ANC and LCOE metrics. Table 2 lists the control parameters for the optimization algorithms used to simulate the proposed technique in MATLAB software. For the case study, GWO and GWCSO algorithms produced comprehensive optimal results, which are presented in Table 3. The results indicate that the GWCSO algorithm predicts the system’s minimum ANC with the lowest LCOE. The GWCSO algorithm predicts 797.38 kW, 2000 kW solar PV wind turbines, 1166.53 batteries, and a 1.47 kW biomass gasifier with 12014467$ total net price cost and an annualized cost of energy of 1084800.5 $, resulting in an LCOE of 0.2052 $/kWh. The GWCSO algorithm forecasts the smallest possible cost of components’ size for the system, as shown in Table 4. This is because the components’ units are the lowest achievable with this optimization algorithm, as shown in Table 3. Additionally, Table 4 demonstrates that energy purchased from the utility grid using GWCSO is less expensive than energy purchased via GWO, and vice versa in the energy sold to the utility grid. The convergence rates of both algorithms are depicted in Figure 7.

FIGURE 7

4.2 Energy management analysis

To meet overall energy demand, the proposed system uses solar, wind, batteries, gasifier, and the utility grid for the purchase or sale of needed or extra energy, respectively. Figure 8A depicts the monthly average energy balance over a year. The annual energy produced by wind, solar photovoltaic, battery (input and output), gasifier, and grid (sale and purchase) are depicted for each month. If the total power generated by solar, wind, batteries, and the maximum gasifier power does not meet the load demand, the gasifier power will be zero, and the power purchased from the grid will meet the load demand. On the other hand, if the power generated by solar and wind alone does not meet the demand, a battery is used to compensate for the lack of available power to meet the demand. So, if there is excess solar and wind energy after meeting the load demand, it is necessary to determine whether all of the available energy can be stored in the battery; if so, the remaining energy should be stored in the battery. Alternatively, after battery charging, sell excess energy to the grid. Figure 8B shows the grid sales and energy purchase in the first week of April. The greatest amount of energy sales is in July, because of the high values of solar radiation and temperature in this month, which gives the greatest amount of power from the solar PV units.

FIGURE 8

Figure 9 depicts a complete power exchange for the first week in April to illustrate the power exchange between the system’s various components. As shown in the Figure, the battery out (red curve) met the load demand in the interval up to [20 h 24 h] of the first week of April because solar and wind energy alone could not meet the demand. The other intervals in which the battery provides energy are [4 h 6 h], [43 h 49 h], [68 h 76 h], [83 h 86 h], [94 h 102 h], and [116 h 124 h]. As discussed in the operational methodology, the utility grid is used only when solar and wind energy are insufficient to meet load demand, battery capacity is equal to or less than the minimum SOC, and also the biomass gasifier cannot meet the load demand. It is cleared from Figure 9B, the MG purchased energy from utility grid in the intervals [1 h 8 h], [24 h 31 h], [48 h 56 h], [101 h 104 h], and [123 h 126 h]. Except for the time periods when the battery supplies energy and the intervals in which the MG purchases energy, excess energy is often sold to the utility grid, as shown by the blue curve.

FIGURE 9

Battery State of Charge (SOC) measurement becomes critical in systems that use batteries as storage devices. Throughout the year, Figure 10 depicts the state of charge of the battery bank, as well as the input and output energy. The initial and minimum allowable SOC levels have been set to 100% and 30%, respectively. Additionally, Figure 10 demonstrates that battery SOC is generally good, except for a few instances when natural resources are limited or load demand is greater.

FIGURE 10

4.3 Robustness test

To evaluate the robustness of the GWCSO and GWO algorithms, a total of 20 independent runs for each algorithm have been carried out. Figure 11 depicts the mean, maximum, and minimum annual cost values, as well as the standard deviation, for a total of 20 runs. As can be seen in the Figure, the GWCSO algorithm exhibits the smallest amount of deviation, resulting in a low deviation from the mean and thus, making it superior to the GWO algorithm. Additionally, it can be seen in the Figure that the GWCSO algorithms provide the smallest mean, minimum, and maximum values of ANC, TNPC, and LCOE when compared to the values obtained by using GWO.

FIGURE 11

5 Conclusion

A reliable, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly hybrid energy management system with solar PV, wind, biomass gasifier and battery storage units for grid connected area has been proposed in this paper. Initially, a brief discussion of the mathematical modeling of the various components adopted in the study is presented; following that, the operational strategy and brief introduction of the GWGSO algorithm are presented. The operating strategy is proposed for energy management by using wind-solar PV renewable sources initially, then energy storage systems, and finally biomass as a last resort, which is the most expensive source. This strategy makes the system capable of trading electrical energy with the utility grid. The GWCSO algorithm has been used to develop a mathematical model for determining the optimal size of components to resolve MG resources coordination, system configuration, and component capacity in order to meet the load demand. Optimization is performed to maximize economic benefit while minimizing energy consumption, pollutants, and other objectives. Finally, the GWCSO algorithm’s results were compared to the GWO algorithm’s results. The results indicate that the GWCSO algorithm can accurately predict the system’s minimum component units, minimum ANC, and lowest LCOE. Also, the proposed algorithm outperformed GWO in terms of robustness due to its lower deviation for multiple runs. The added value of this study is that it illustrates the techno-economic and environmental consequences of grid-connected hybrid systems at various integration levels, making it easier for the investor to choose the optimal system (Mahmoud et al., 2020).

References

• 1

  AbouzahrI.RamakumarR. (1990). Loss of power supply probability of stand alone wind electric conversion system. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers.5 (3), 445. 10.1109/60.105267

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 2

  AbushnafJ.RassauA. (2018). Impact of energy management system on the sizing of a grid-connected PV/Battery system. Electr. J.31 (2), 58–66. 10.1016/j.tej.2018.02.009

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3

  AhmadG.EnayatzareM. (2018). Optimal energy management of a renewable-based isolated microgrid with pumped-storage unit and demand response. Renew. Energy123, 460–474. 10.1016/j.renene.2018.02.072

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 4

  AhmedA.El-RifaieA. M.ZakyM. M.TolbaM. A. (2022). Optimal sizing of stand-alone microgrids based on recent metaheuristic algorithms. Mathematics10, 140. 10.3390/math10010140

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5

  AkramU.KhalidM.ShafiqS. (2018). Optimal sizing of a wind/solar/battery hybrid grid-connected microgrid system. IET Renew. Power Gener.12 (1), 72–80. 10.1049/iet-rpg.2017.0010

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 6

  AlhasnawiB. N.JasimB. H.SedhomB. E. (2021). Distributed secondary consensus fault tolerant control method for voltage and frequency restoration and power sharing control in multi-agent microgrid. Int. J. Electr. Power & Energy Syst.133, 107251. 10.1016/j.ijepes.2021.107251

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7

  AlhasnawiB. N.JasimB. H.RahmanZ. A. S. A.GuerreroJ. M.EstebanM. D. (2021). A novel internet of energy based optimal multi-agent control scheme for microgrid including renewable energy resources. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health18, 8146. 10.3390/ijerph18158146

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8

  AlhasnawiB. N.JasimB. H.SianoP.GuerreroJ. M. (2021). A novel real-time electricity scheduling for home energy management system using the internet of energy. Energies14, 3191. 10.3390/en14113191

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9

  AlhasnawiB. A.JasimB. H.RahmanZ. A. S. A.SianoP. (2021). A novel robust smart energy management and demand reduction for smart homes based on internet of energy. Sensors21, 4756. 10.3390/s21144756

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 10

  BadawyM. O.CingozF.SozerY. (2016). “Battery storage sizing for a grid Tied PV system based on operating cost minimization,” in Proceeding of the 2016 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), Milwaukee, WI, USA, September 2016 (IEEE), 16671891.

  • Google Scholar

• 11

  BelmiliH.HaddadiM.BachaS.Fayçal AlmiM.BendibB. (2014). Sizing standalone photovoltaic–wind hybrid system: Techno-economic analysis and optimization. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.30, 821–832. 10.1016/j.rser.2013.11.011

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12

  BhattacharjeeS.DeyA. (2014). Techno-economic performance evaluation of grid integrated PV-biomass hybrid power generation for rice mill. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assessments7, 6–16. 10.1016/j.seta.2014.02.005

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 13

  BiswasA.KumarA. (2017). Techno-Economic Optimization of a Stand-alone PV/PHS/Battery systems for very low load situation. Int. J. Renew. Energy Res.7, 844–856. 10.20508/ijrer.v7i2.4900.g7065

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14

  CaiW.YangC. Y.HeB. (2003). Preliminary extension logic, science press. Beijing: Simplified Chinese version.

  • Google Scholar

• 15

  CuevasE.Reyna-OrtaA. (2014). A cuckoo search algorithm for multimodal optimization. Sci. World J.2014, 497514. Hindawi Publishing Corporation. 10.1155/2014/497514

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 16

  ElhadidyM. A.ShaahidS. (1999). Optimal sizing of battery storage for hybrid (wind+diesel) power systems. Renew. Energy18, pp77–86. 10.1016/s0960-1481(98)00796-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 17

  ElhadidyM. A.ShaahidS. M. (2004). Role of hybrid (wind+diesel) power systems in meeting commercial loads. Renew. Energy29, 109–118. 10.1016/s0960-1481(03)00067-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 18

  GonzalezA.RibaJ. R.RiusA.PuigR. (2015). Optimal sizing of a hybrid grid-connected photovoltaic and wind power system. Appl. Energy154, 752–762. [CrossRef]. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.105

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19

  GuptaA.SainiR. P.SharmaM. P. (2010). Steady-state modelling of hybrid energy system for off grid electrification of cluster of villages. Renew. Energy35 (2), 520–535. 10.1016/j.renene.2009.06.014

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 20

  GuptaS.DeepK. (2019). A novel random walk grey wolf optimizer. Swarm Evol. Comput.44, 101–112. 10.1016/j.swevo.2018.01.001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 21

  KaabA.SharifiM.MobliH.Nabavi-PelesaraeiA.ChauK. W. (2019). Use of optimization techniques for energy use efficiency and environmental life cycle assessment modification in sugarcane production. Energy181, 1298–1320. [CrossRef]. 10.1016/j.energy.2019.06.002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 22

  KaabecheA.BelhamelM.IbtiouenR. (2011). Sizing optimization of grid-independent hybrid photovoltaic/wind power generation system. Energy36, 1214–1222. 10.1016/j.energy.2010.11.024

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 23

  KaravasC-S.ArvanitisK. G.PapadakisG. (2019). Optimal technical and economic configuration of photovoltaic powered reverse osmosis desalination systems operating in autonomous mode. Desalination466, 97–106. 10.1016/j.desal.2019.05.007

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 24

  KaravasC.-S.ArvanitisK.PapadakisG. (2017). A game theory approach to multi-agent decentralized energy management of autonomous polygeneration microgrids. Energies10 (11), 1756. 10.3390/en10111756

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 25

  KyriakarakosG.ArvanitisK. G.KaravasC.-S.PapadakisG. (2015). A multi-agent decentralized energy management system based on distributed intelligence for the design and control of autonomous polygeneration microgrids. Energy Convers. Manag.103, 166–179. 10.1016/j.enconman.2015.06.021

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 26

  LongW.JiaoJ.LiangX.TangM. (2018). An exploration-enhanced grey wolf optimizer to solve high-dimensional numerical optimization. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell.68, 63–80. 10.1016/j.engappai.2017.10.024

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 27

  MahmoudH. Y.HasanienH. M.BesheerA. H.AbdelazizA. Y. (2020). Hybrid cuckoo search algorithm and grey wolf optimiser‐based optimal control strategy for performance enhancement of HVDC‐based offshore wind farms. IET Gener. Transm. &amp. Distrib.14 (10), 1902–1911. 10.1049/iet-gtd.2019.0801

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 28

  MalheiroA.CastroP. M.LimaR. M.EstanqueiroA. (2015). Integrated sizing and scheduling of wind/PV/diesel/battery isolated systems. Renew. Energy83, 646–657. 10.1016/j.renene.2015.04.066

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 29

  MantegnaR. N. (1994). Fast, accurate algorithm for numerical simulation of Levy stable stochastic processes. Phys. Rev. E49 (4), 4677–4683. 10.1103/physreve.49.4677

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 30

  MlakarU.FisterI.Jr.FisterI. (2016). Hybrid self-adaptive cuckoo search for global optimization. Swarm Evol. Comput.29, 47–72. 10.1016/j.swevo.2016.03.001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31

  NacerT.NadjemiO.HamidatA. (2015). “Optimal sizing method for grid connected renewable energy system under Algerian climate,” in Proceeding of the 6th International Renewable Energy Congress (IREC), Sousse, Tunisia, March 2015 (IEEE).

  • Google Scholar

• 32

  NadjemiO.NacerT.HamidatA.SalhiH. (2017). Optimal hybrid PV/wind energy system sizing: Application of cuckoo search algorithm for Algerian dairy farms. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.70, 1352–1365. 10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.038

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 33

  National Renewable Energy LaboratoryNational renewable energy laboratory (USA). [last accessed April, 2022].

  • Google Scholar

• 34

  NehrirM. H.WangC.StrunzK.AkiH.RamakumarR.BingJ.et al (2011). A review of hybrid renewable/alternative energy systems for electric power generation: Configurations, control, and applications. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy2 (4), 392–403. 10.1109/tste.2011.2157540

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 35

  NouniM. R.MullickS. C.KandpalT. C. (2007). Biomass gasifier projects for decentralized power supply in India: A financial evaluation. Energy Policy35 (2), 1373–1385. 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.03.016

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 36

  PatilA. B. K.SainiR. P.SharmaM. P. (2010). Integrated renewable energy systems for off grid rural electrification of remote area. Renew. Energy35 (6), 1342–1349. 10.1016/j.renene.2009.10.005

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 37

  PatilA. B. K.SainiR. P.SharmaM. P. (2011). Sizing of integrated renewable energy system based on load profiles and reliability index for the state of Uttarakhand in India. Renew. Energy36 (11), 2809. 10.1016/j.renene.2011.04.022

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 38

  RamliM. A. M.BouchekaraH. R. E. H.AlghamdiA. S. (2018). Optimal sizing of PV/wind/diesel hybrid microgrid system using multi-objective self-adaptive differential evolution algorithm. Renew. Energy121, 400–411. 10.1016/j.renene.2018.01.058

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 39

  BorowyB.SalamehZ. (1996). Methodology for optimally sizing the combination of a battery bank and PV array in a wind/PV hybrid system. IEEE Trans. energy Convers.11, 367–375. 10.1109/60.507648

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 40

  SaxenaA.KumarR.DasS. (2019). β-Chaotic map enabled grey wolf optimizer. Appl. Soft Comput.75, 84–105. 10.1016/j.asoc.2018.10.044

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 41

  ShaktiS.MukeshS.KaushikS. (2016). A review on optimization techniques for sizing of solar-wind hybrid energy systems. Int. J. Green Energy13 (15), 1564–1578. 10.1080/15435075.2016.1207079

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 42

  SinghJ.PanesarB. S.SharmaS. K. (2008). Energy potential through agricultural biomass using geographical information system: A case study of Punjab. Biomass Bioenergy32, 301–307. 10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.10.003

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 43

  SinghS.KaushikS. C. (2016). Optimal sizing of grid integrated hybrid PV‐biomass energy system using artificial bee colony algorithmficial bee colony algorithm. IET Renew. Power Gener.10 (5), 642–650. 10.1049/iet-rpg.2015.0298

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 44

  SinghS.KaushikS. C. (2016). Optimal sizing of grid integrated hybrid PV-biomass energy system using artificial bee colony algorithm. IET Renew. Power Gener.10 (5), 642–650. 10.1049/iet-rpg.2015.0298

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 45

  SinghS.SinghM.KaushikS. C. (2016). Feasibility study of an islanded microgrid in rural area consisting of PV, wind, biomass and battery energy storage system. Energy Convers. Manag.128, 178–190. 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.09.046

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 46

  WangP.WangW.XuD. (2018). Optimal sizing of distributed generations in DC microgrids with comprehensive consideration of system operation modes and operation targets. IEEE Access6, 31129–31140. 10.1109/access.2018.2842119

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 47

  WuK.ZhouH.AnS.HuangT. (2015). Optimal coordinate operation control for windphotovoltaic-battery storage power generation units. Energy Convers. Manag.90, 466–475. 10.1016/j.enconman.2014.11.038

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 48

  XuH.LiuX.SuJ. (2017). “An improved grey wolf optimizer algorithm integrated with cuckoo search,” in Proceeding of the the 9th IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Data Acquisition and Advanced Computing Systems: Technology and Applications, Bucharest, Romania, September 2017 (IEEE).

  • Google Scholar

• 49

  YangH.ZhouW.LuL.FangZ. (2008). Optimal sizing method for standalone hybrid solar-wind system with LPSP technology by using genetic algorithm. Sol. Energy82, 354–367. 10.1016/j.solener.2007.08.005

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 50

  ZhangY.LundbladA.CampanaP. E.BenaventeF.YanJ. (2017). Battery sizing and rule-based operation of grid-connected photovoltaic-battery system: A case study in Sweden. Energy Convers. Manag.133, 249–263. 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.11.060

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar