REVIEW article

Front. Immunol., 15 August 2018

Sec. Immunological Memory

Volume 9 - 2018 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.01904

The Emerging Role of CD8+ Tissue Resident Memory T (TRM) Cells in Antitumor Immunity: A Unique Functional Contribution of the CD103 Integrin

    SC

    Stéphanie Corgnac

    MB

    Marie Boutet

    MK

    Maria Kfoury

    CN

    Charles Naltet

    FM

    Fathia Mami-Chouaib *

  • INSERM UMR 1186, Integrative Tumor Immunology and Genetic Oncology, Gustave Roussy, EPHE, PSL, Fac. de Médecine – Univ. Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France

Article metrics

View details

149

Citations

22,3k

Views

9,3k

Downloads

Abstract

Cancer immunotherapy is aimed at stimulating tumor-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes and their subsequent trafficking so that they may reach, and persist in, the tumor microenvironment, recognizing and eliminating malignant target cells. Thus, characterization of the phenotype and effector functions of CD8+ T lymphocytes infiltrating human solid tumors is essential for better understanding and manipulating the local antitumor immune response, and for defining their contribution to the success of current cancer immunotherapy approaches. Accumulating evidence indicates that a substantial subpopulation of CD3+CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes are tissue resident memory T (TRM) cells, and is emerging as an activated tumor-specific T-cell subset. These TRM cells accumulate in various human cancer tissues, including non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), ovarian and breast cancers, and are defined by expression of CD103 [αE(CD103)β7] and/or CD49a [α1(CD49a)β1] integrins, along with C-type lectin CD69, which most likely contribute to their residency characteristic. CD103 binds to the epithelial cell marker E-cadherin, thereby promoting retention of TRM cells in epithelial tumor islets and maturation of cytotoxic immune synapse with specific cancer cells, resulting in T-cell receptor (TCR)-dependent target cell killing. Moreover, CD103 integrin triggers bidirectional signaling events that cooperate with TCR signals to enable T-cell migration and optimal cytokine production. Remarkably, TRM cells infiltrating human NSCLC tumors also express inhibitory receptors such as programmed cell death-1, the neutralization of which, with blocking antibodies, enhances CD103-dependent TCR-mediated cytotoxicity toward autologous cancer cells. Thus, accumulation of TRM cells at the tumor site explains the more favorable clinical outcome, and might be associated with the success of immune checkpoint blockade in a fraction of cancer patients.

Introduction

CD8+ T lymphocytes play an essential role in defense against cancers through recognition by T-cell receptors (TCR) of specific antigenic peptides presented on the surface of malignant cells by major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I) molecules, and elimination of the tumor target, mainly by releasing the content of cytolytic granules containing perforin and granzymes. To destroy their target, cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) must first migrate to the tumor site, infiltrate the tumor tissue, and interact with the cancer cell, to finally trigger effector functions leading to transformed cell eradication. Integrins and their ligands (1) play a crucial role in promoting antitumor T-cell activities by regulating T-cell migration and retention within the tumor, adhesion to antigen-presenting cells and co-stimulation resulting in CTL activation and functions (2). Cytokines and chemokines are also involved in coordinating circulation, homing, retention, and activation of T lymphocytes. Although some of them are known to contribute to tumor cell proliferation and dissemination by inhibiting tumor-specific T-cell responses, others promote infiltration and activation of T lymphocytes in a hostile tumor ecosystem, resulting in tumor cell destruction (3). In this regard, TGF-β, abundant in the tumor microenvironment, was reported to be an immunosuppressive factor used by malignant cells to escape from the immune response (4). This cytokine inhibits expression of lymphocyte-function-associated antigen-1 (LFA-1, also known as αLβ2 or CD11a) integrin and LFA-1-mediated T-cell functions (5). Paradoxically, this cytokine induces CD103 (also known as αEβ7 or HML-1) integrin expression on activated intraepithelial CD8+ T lymphocytes, and enhanced CD103-dependent T-cell adhesion and signaling (6, 7).

LFA-1 and CD103 are the predominant integrins expressed by intraepithelial T lymphocytes (IEL) and CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL). While the contribution of LFA-1 and its ligand ICAM-1 (CD54) to TCR-mediated CTL activities is well documented (8), much less is known about the role of CD103 and its ligand, the epithelial cell marker E-cadherin, to T-cell-mediated cytolytic activity. CD103 has been associated with cytotoxicity of CD8+ T cells in several human pathologies, including graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (9), allogeneic transplant rejection (1012), autoimmune diseases (13, 14), and cancer (6, 15). This integrin, together with the activation marker CD69 and the integrin CD49a [also known as α1β1 or very late antigen-1 (VLA-1)], defines a recently identified subtype of CD8+ T lymphocytes called “tissue-resident memory T (TRM) cells,” possibly endowed with potent cytotoxic activities. Moreover, there is an emerging consensus that TRM cells frequently accumulate in multiple human tumors, especially of epithelial origin, and play an essential role in tumor-specific T-cell responses and, likely, in control of malignant diseases. TRM cells are also surrogate markers of the efficacy of cancer vaccines (16, 17), and a low number of this T-cell subset among TIL may correlate with failure of immune checkpoint blockade therapy in most cancer patients. In this review, we focus on CD8+ TRM cells accumulating in human solid tumors, mainly non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), and current insight implicating CD103 integrin in regulating TRM functions and CTL-mediated antitumor immune responses, with potential prognosis and immunotherapeutic applications.

Phenotypic and Molecular Features of TRM Cells in Tumors

It is now generally agreed that a population of TRM cells accumulates in tumors of epithelial origin, such as ovarian, pancreatic, colorectal, and lung tumors (15, 1820), as well as those of non-epithelial origin, including malignant glioma and melanoma (21, 22). These TRM cells express a broad range of integrins and chemokine receptors, probably involved in their migration to the tumor site, and may interfere with their egress from the tumor tissue. Transcriptional studies pointed to expression of CXCR3 and CXCR6 by TRM cells infiltrating human lungs (23). Intratumoral TRM cells express high levels of CCR5 and CCR6 chemokine receptors that may confer T-cell homing to the inflammatory tumor microenvironment (15). Moreover, CCR5 is recruited at the immune synapse formed between T cells and tumor target cells upon interaction of CD103 with E-cadherin, promoting retention of TRM cells at the tumor site by inhibiting their sensitivity to a CCL5 chemotactic gradient (7). By contrast, TRM cells do not express CX3CR1, a chemokine receptor that mediates transmigration through the endothelium, supporting the hypothesis that this T-cell population has reached its final destination and does not need to exit from the lung tissue (23). Lung tumor TRM lack expression of lymph node homing receptors CCR7 and CD62L, as well as the receptor for sphingosine 1-phosphate, S1PR1 (15), which mediates the egress of T cells from lymphoid organs (24). Indeed, downregulation of SIPR1 appears to be a prerequisite for retention of CD8+CD103+ TRM cells in peripheral tissues (25, 26).

With regard to adhesion/costimulatory molecules, the expression profile of intratumoral TRM cells seems to be compatible with their capacity to reside in tumor tissue and their inability to recirculate in the bloodstream. In melanoma, CD8+ TRM cells were found to co-express CD69, CD103, and VLA-1 (CD49a or α1β1 integrin), with the latter reported to cause long-term retention of activated T cells in peripheral tissues (27). Human lung tumor CD8+ TRM cells are characterized by downregulation of CD28 and upregulation of CD69 and CD103 and CD49a integrins, which are most likely induced by TGF-β in the tumor microenvironment (15, 28). TGF-β plays a pivotal role in formation and maintenance of TRM, at least in part via induction of CD103. Indeed, TGF-β is directly involved in CD103 expression in tumor-specific T cells upon engagement of TCR with specific tumor peptide–MHC-I complexes (7), through binding of Smad2/3 and NFAT-1 transcription factors to promoter and enhancer elements of the ITGAE gene, which encodes the CD103 (αE) subunit (29). This cytokine is also involved in dampening expression of the LFA-1 integrin on TIL, thus participating in T-cell residency within the tumor (15, 30). In LCMV chronic infection, but not acute infection, TGF-β signaling inhibits migration of CD8+ effector T lymphocytes from the spleen to the gut by dampening expression of integrin α4β7 during the formation phase of TRM cells (31). Consequently, CD8+ Tgfbr2−/− T cells migrate normally to the intestine, but their retention in the gut epithelium is impaired. In contrast, TGF-β signaling does not impact α4β7 integrin expression and T-cell migration to the gut after acute bacterial infection (32). Moreover, E-cadherin, which is downregulated by TGF-β in cancer cells during epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition [for a review see Ref. (33)], appeared to promote accumulation of a subset of CD8+ memory T cells in murine submandibular glands by a mechanism independent of CD103 (34). This cytokine has been identified as a potential therapeutic target in cancer because of its role in supporting tumor progression and in inducing immunosuppression. In this regard, it has been shown that targeting the TGF-β pathway inhibits tumor growth by promoting antitumor immunity associated with increased CD8+ T-cell numbers (35). However, the consequence of such cancer immunotherapy approaches on TRM cells, the maintenance of which is dependent of TGF-β, has not been addressed.

T-cell inhibitory receptors are important for maintaining self-tolerance and regulating the immune response in peripheral tissues (36). Among these immune checkpoints, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen (CTLA)-4 and Tim-3 appeared to be associated with tumor antigen-specific CD8+ T-cell dysfunction in melanoma patients (37). CD103+ TRM cells have been shown to express a wide range of inhibitory receptors, such as CTLA-4, Tim-3, and programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), associated with their capacity to maintain peripheral tolerance (25, 38). Data from our group and other groups revealed that intratumoral CD8+CD103+ TRM cells frequently express PD-1, Tim-3, and Lag-3, which are likely involved in their exhausted state and their dysfunctioning at the tumor site (15, 28, 39, 40). Notably, TGF-β is also involved in PD-1 induction on CD8+ T cells, contributing to T-cell anergy and a sustained tolerance (41). Neutralization of TGF-β results in downregulation of PD-1 expression in T cells causing graft rejection. Mechanistically, PD-1 is regulated by the NFATc1 transcription factor (42), and is enhanced by a TGF-β/SMAD3-dependent signaling pathway (43). Expression of PD-1 on TIL is described as a biomarker of CD8+ tumor-reactive T cells in cancer patients (44). Thus, the PD-1+ status of tumor TRM cells suggests that they are enriched with antigen-specific CD8+ T cells that may be used as targets in cancer immunotherapy.

Alongside upregulation of genes encoding PD-1, CTLA-4 and Tim-3, CD8+ TIL display increased expression levels of genes encoding transcription factors EGR1 and Nr4a2 (25, 38), as well BATF and NAB1, suggesting a role in TRM establishment in the tumor (28). CD8+CD103+ TIL also express an increased level of T-bet (45) and the Runx3 transcription factor, which programs their residency in tumors (46). Indeed, Runx3 deficiency impaired TIL accumulation without affecting migration to the tumor, associated with an increase in tumor growth. By contrast, KLF2 transcription factor was diminished in TRM cells from human TILhi tumors (28), while Notch activity appeared to be required for maintenance of CD103+ TRM cells in mouse tumors (23). Therefore, additional studies are needed to better characterize the transcriptional features of CD8+CD103+ TRM cells in human tumors, and transcriptional factors that govern their residency in malignant tissues. Overall, the TRM cell subset is characterized by a Runx3+, Notch+, Hobit+, Blimp1+, BATF+, EOMESneg, and Tbetlow transcription factor profile (23, 4649) and is defined by the surface expression of CD103, CD49a, and CD69 [for reviews see Ref. (5052)]. It also expresses the inhibitory receptors PD-1, CTLA-4, and Tim-3 (15, 38, 53), and is promoted by particular route of immunization targeting tissue dendritic cells (17, 54, 55) and specific environmental factors mainly TGF-β, IL-33, and IL-15 (5659).

Functional Activities of Intratumoral TRM Cells

Thus far, little is known about CD8+CD103+ TRM functions in tumor tissues. Immune checkpoint expression by CD103+ TIL suggested that CD8+ TRM cells in tumors are enriched with tumor antigen-specific CTL. These T cells were found to express transcripts encoding products linked to cytotoxic functions of CD8+ T lymphocytes, including IFNG, GZMA, GZMB, SEMA7A, KLRB1, CCL3, STAT1, RAB27A, IL21R, and FKBP1A (28). Expression of granzyme A, granzyme B, and perforin by CD8+CD103+ TIL was also observed at the protein level, together with the CD107a (LAMP-1) degranulation marker and the Ki-67 proliferation marker (15, 28, 45, 60).

Functional studies showed that CD8+CD103+ TIL are able to secrete inflammatory cytokines, including interferon (IFN)γ and TNFα (28, 46). Moreover, interaction of CD103 with E-cadherin on tumor target cells optimizes cytokine release, since siRNA targeting E-cadherin partially inhibited IFNγ production (61). Cytotoxicity experiments indicated that freshly isolated CD103+ TIL were able to kill autologous tumor cells following neutralization of the PD-1–PD-L1 interaction with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 blocking antibodies (15). This cytotoxic activity is most likely mediated by CD103+ T cells, since anti-CD103 neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAb) compromise this function. Consistently, cytotoxicity of CD103+ T-cell clones toward autologous E-cadherin+ tumor cells is inhibited anti-CD103 blocking mAb (6). Another noteworthy aspect of our contribution to the field is the demonstration that CD103 is an important molecule required for polarization of cytotoxic granules at the immune synapse formed between CTL clones and autologous tumor cells, and that siRNA targeting E-cadherin inhibited TCR-mediated target cell killing (6). Moreover, CD103 contributes to recruitment of CD103+ TRM cells within epithelial tumor islets, and intratumoral early T-cell signaling (30).

A role for the VLA-1 integrin in the differentiation and functions of TRM cells was reported in a mouse tumor model (27). VLA-1+ T cells, co-expressing or not CD103, secreted high levels of IFNγ upon re-stimulation, and this cytokine production was impaired by anti-VLA-1 or anti-CD103 mAb. Moreover, blockade of VLA-1 or CD103 severely compromised control of tumor growth in vivo. Similar studies revealed that CD8+CD103+ TRM cells accumulate and protect mice against melanoma in a CD103-dependent manner, and these TRM cells play a pivotal role in perpetuating antitumor immunity (22). Conversely, it has been reported that anti-latency-associated peptide (LAP) antibodies targeting the LAP/TGF-β complex induce a decrease in CD8+CD103+ T cells in mouse spleen and lymph nodes, and that this peculiar T-cell subset displays a tolerogenic feature (62). Murine CD8+CD103+ regulatory T cells have also been described in autoimmune diseases where they are induced by TGF-β and display suppressive activities independently of granzyme B (63). Moreover, CD8+CD103+ T cells are crucial for prevention of chronic GVHD lupus in mice by suppressing T helper and B cell responses through a non-cytotoxic mechanism involving TGF-β and IL-10 signals (64). However, further studies are needed to permit the distinction between human CD8+CD103+ CTL and CD8+CD103+ T regulatory cells, even though granzyme B expression appears as a good marker, and determine the exact contribution of both subsets in autoimmune [for a review see Ref. (65)] and cancer diseases.

Bidirectional Signaling of CD103 Dictates its Activation and Functions

Integrins are heterodimeric transmembrane receptors that mediate cell-extracellular matrix adhesion and cell–cell interactions (2). Among a family of 24 members (1), the CD103 integrin, formed by αE (CD103) and β7 subunits, is exclusively expressed by leukocytes, in particular IEL (66), psoriatic skin epidermal CD8+ T cells (67), cervico-vaginal antigen-specific CTL (68), and CD8+ T lymphocytes infiltrating various human tumors (6, 1820, 60, 69). The restricted distribution of the CD103 integrin is attributed to expression of the αE subunit, since the β7 subunit is widely expressed in T cells (70).

On naive T lymphocytes, integrins have weak affinity for their ligands. However, stimulation of T lymphocytes through TCR or chemokine receptors initiates an “inside-out” signal that induces integrin activation by triggering integrin-extended conformation and clustering, thereby enhancing their affinity for their ligands. Firm adhesion of integrins to their ligands triggers an “outside-in” signal that has costimulatory functions in TCR signaling, thereby contributing to T-cell activation, migration, and cytotoxicity (7173). Until recently, the signaling pathways of CD103 integrin and the molecules involved in its bidirectional activation were not clearly elucidated. Like the other integrins, CD103 activation is regulated by TCR engagement. In this context, it has been shown that cross-linking of TCR on IEL or cell treatment with phorbol myristate acetate increased the avidity of CD103 for E-cadherin and provided a mechanism for lymphocyte adherence and activation (74). Furthermore, the CCR9 ligand, CCL25, induced CD103-mediated adhesion of CD8+ IEL to E-cadherin, suggesting a role for this chemokine receptor/chemokine pair in promoting functions of CD103 via inside-out signaling (75). Similarly, the CCL7 chemokine has been shown to favor adhesion and retention of CD103-expressing T cells during renal allograft rejection, by promoting the adhesive properties of CD103 (76).

TGF-β is responsible for inducing CD103 integrin in CD8+ T lymphocytes (6, 77) by regulating expression of both ITGAE (29, 78) and ITGB7 (79) genes encoding αE and β7 chains, respectively. In addition, in contrast to all other integrins, TGF-β regulates CD103 activation and signaling within epithelial tissues (Figure 1). Indeed, we previously demonstrated that the interaction of TGF-β with its receptors TGFBR on the surface of CD8+CD103+ T cells induces recruitment and phosphorylation of integrin-linked kinase (ILK) by TGFBR1 (activin receptor-like kinase-5) (30). We further showed that phosphorylated-ILK interacted with the CD103 subunit intracellular domain, resulting in phosphorylation of protein kinase B (PKB)/AKT, thereby initiating integrin inside-out signaling leading to activation of CD103 and strengthening of CD103-E-cadherin adhesion.

Figure 1

Figure 1

TGF-β induces CD103 expression in tumor-specific T cells and participates in integrin bidirectional signaling. Left: TGF-β controls CD103 expression in tumor antigen (Ag)-specific T cells upon interaction of T-cell receptor (TCR) with specific tumor peptide–major histocompatibility complex class I complexes, via a Smad-dependent pathway. TGF-β binds to TGFBR at the surface of CD8+ T lymphocytes and leads to recruitment and phosphorylation of Smad2 and Smad3 and their subsequent nuclear translocation. Transcription factors NFAT-1, translocated into the nucleus upon TCR engagement, and Smad2/3 bind to promoter and enhancer elements of the ITGAE gene, which encodes the CD103 (αE) subunit, and activates CD103 expression (29). Right: TGF-β participates in CD103 intracellular signaling via a non-Smad-dependent pathway. Interaction of TGF-β with TGFBR on CD8+CD103+ TRM cells induces recruitment and phosphorylation of integrin-linked kinase (ILK). Phosphorylated (P)-ILK interacts with the CD103 subunit intracellular domain, resulting in phosphorylation of protein kinase B/AKT and initiating integrin inside-out signaling leading to activation of CD103 (30). CD103-E-cadherin tight adhesion initiates an outside-in signal by promoting phosphorylation of paxillin (Pax) and Pyk2, and subsequent binding of phosphorylated-paxillin to the αE subunit tail where a phosphorylatable Ser (S) in the ES1163IRKAQL motif plays an important role (80). Adhesive interaction of E-cadherin with CD103 also triggers activation of PI3K/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and phospholipase C/PKC pathways (60), providing intracellular signals that promote CD8+ TRM effector functions, including actin cytoskeleton reorganization, T-cell spreading and migration, cytokine release and polarized exocytosis of cytotoxic granules leading to target cell destruction.

The mechanism regulating the CD103 outside-in signaling pathway is not fully understood. Studies from our group have shown that CD103-E-cadherin tight adhesion initiates an outside-in signal by promoting phosphorylation of the focal-adhesion-associated adaptor protein paxillin and proline-rich tyrosine kinase-2 (Pyk2), and subsequent binding of phosphorylated-paxillin to the CD103 subunit tail (80). In addition, the adhesive interaction of E-cadherin with CD103 on TIL triggers phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 (ERK1/2) and phospholipase C γ1 proteins, providing intracellular signals that promote CTL effector functions (60). These studies emphasize a unique costimulatory role of the CD103 integrin in activation of tumor-specific CTL, by triggering polarization of cytotoxic granules at the immune synapse and subsequent TCR-mediated cytotoxicity (60), and in proliferation of CD103+ thymocyte cells (81). Engagement of CD103 with E-cadherin also determines cell shape and motility of CD103+ lymphocytes (82), and recruitment of CD8+ TRM cells within epithelial tumor islets, in an actin-polymerization-dependent fashion (30, 80). Moreover, TGF-β enhances T-cell adhesion and movement toward tumor regions by increasing CD103 expression levels and promoting intracellular T-cell signals leading to integrin activation (30). CD103 also contributes to retention of TRM cell subpopulations by interacting with E-cadherin and mediating arrest of T lymphocytes on epithelial tissues (32, 61). Thus, CD103 appears to be a unique integrin for adjusting T-cell adhesion and migratory potential in a TGF-β-rich tumor microenvironment, as well as retention of tumor-specific CD8+ TRM cells and local antitumor effector functions (Figure 1).

Prognostic Value of TRM Cells in Human Cancers

CD8+CD103+ TRM cells have emerged as predictive markers of patient survival in several malignant diseases, including ovarian, lung, endometrial, and breast cancers (15, 20, 28, 83, 84). Indeed, in a large cohort of high-grade serous ovarian cancers (20) and a cohort of early-stage NSCLC (15), an enhanced CD103+ TIL subset correlated with improved patient survival. CD103+ TIL were also associated with a favorable prognosis in urothelial cell carcinoma of the bladder, and could represent a favorable prognostic predictor of overall and recurrence-free survival (83). In that retrospective study, CD8+ T cells were identified as the principal cellular sources of CD103, and the density of intratumoral CD103+ cells was inversely associated with tumor size. More recent studies also defined the CD103 integrin as a biomarker of good prognosis in cohorts of breast (85) and lung cancer (17, 28, 84). Notably, TRM infiltration in lung cancer correlated with better clinical outcome in both univariate and multivariate analyses, independently of CD8+ T cells (17). In addition, high numbers of intratumoral CD103+ TIL were significantly associated with prolonged disease-free survival and overall survival in patients with pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma, but not in those with pulmonary adenocarcinoma (84). The epithelial localization of CD103+ TIL has an even more significant predictive value compared to the stromal location, suggesting that intraepithelial CD8+CD103+ cells encompass a higher proportion of tumor-specific TRM cells (15, 85). This intratumoral positioning of CD103+ TIL was correlated with expression of E-cadherin on tumor cells in bladder cancer (83), but not in ovarian or breast cancer (20, 85). Moreover, this predominant location in intratumoral regions, rather than in the stroma, was associated with the capacity of CD103 to promote recruitment of TIL in epithelial tumor islets (30). Thus, TRM cells appear to be key components in antitumor immunity, and their presence at the tumor site predicts a favorable prognosis in many cancers of different histological types. Paradoxically, their dominant expression of checkpoint receptors suggests that may be functionally exhausted. However, their location in close contact with tumor cells, their ability to proliferate in situ, to produce granzyme B and other cytotoxic molecules and pro-inflammatory cytokines, support the hypothesis that TRM cells are enriched in tumor-specific CD8+ T cells that could trigger specific cytotoxic activity toward target cells in physiological conditions and following neutralization of PD-1–PD-L1 interaction, as we demonstrated ex vivo (15) and possibly also during anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 cancer immunotherapy. Accordantly, recent studies revealed an expansion of CD8+CD103+ TRM cells during anti-PD-1 treatment in melanoma (86).

Concluding Remarks

Overall, CD8+ TRM cells that accumulate in human tumor lesions appear to be important effectors in antitumor CTL responses. Their retention within the tumor ecosystem may control tumor growth and explain more favorable prognoses in certain cancer patients. Moreover, CD103 emerges as a key molecule in CD8+ TRM activation, the expression of which is probably adjusted in the tumor microenvironment by TGF-β. This integrin not only promotes T-cell adhesion to target cells through interaction with its unique known ligand E-cadherin but also provides positive signals triggering diverse T-cell effector functions, such as spreading, migration, proliferation, and cytotoxicity (Figure 1). Nevertheless, additional studies and tools are required to further decipher CD103 structure and bidirectional signaling, and to determine whether this integrin also undergoes conformational changes within the tumor ecosystem in order to control the affinity to its ligand E-cadherin and to regulate its functional properties. In this regard, identification of new partners and associated molecules controlling integrin intracellular signals and regulating the dynamics of CD103 are essential in order to optimize the antitumor reactivity of CD8+ TRM cells. They would also help to determine the true contribution of CD8+CD103+ TRM cells and the identified costimulatory molecules in the success of immune checkpoint blockade immunotherapies in a minor subpopulation of cancer patients, and to improve current T-cell-based cancer immunotherapeutic approaches such as adoptive T-cell therapies (Figure 2).

Figure 2

Figure 2

Adoptive transfer of CD8+CD103+ TRM cells for cancer immunotherapy. CD8+CD103+ TRM cells, suspected to express tumor-reactive T-cell receptors, are isolated from tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), amplified ex vivo in the presence of T-cell growth factors, including IL-2, and then reinjected into cancer patients, in combination or not with immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as anti-programmed cell death-1, to reverse T-cell exhaustion and optimize the antitumor cytotoxic T lymphocyte response.

Statements

Author contributions

SC, MB, and FM-C coordinated the writing of the manuscript. SC, MB, MK, CN, and FM-C participated in drafting and editing the text and figures. All authors gave final approval to the version submitted.

Funding

Institut national du Cancer (INCa) PL-Bio 2016 (n° INCA_10557), Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer (ARC) (n° PJA20161204720), Groupement des Entreprises françaises de Lutte contre le Cancer (GEFLUC) (n° R15080LL) and Ligue contre le cancer « Comité des Yvelines » (n° 9FI12414QLCZ). SC is a recipient of a fellowship from INCa.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

CTL, cytotoxic T lymphocytes; CTLA, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen; PD-1, programmed cell death-1; IFN, interferon; LFA-1, lymphocyte-function-associated antigen-1; mAb, monoclonal antibodies; NSCLC, non-small-cell lung carcinoma; MHC-I, major histocompatibility complex class I; TCR, T-cell receptor; TIL, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes.

References

  • 1

    BarczykMCarracedoSGullbergD. Integrins. Cell Tissue Res (2010) 339(1):26980.10.1007/s00441-009-0834-6

  • 2

    PribilaJTQualeACMuellerKLShimizuY. Integrins and T cell-mediated immunity. Annu Rev Immunol (2004) 22:15780.10.1146/annurev.immunol.22.012703.104649

  • 3

    FranciszkiewiczKBoissonnasABoutetMCombadiereCMami-ChouaibF. Role of chemokines and chemokine receptors in shaping the effector phase of the antitumor immune response. Cancer Res (2012) 72(24):632532.10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-2027

  • 4

    ThomasDAMassagueJ. TGF-beta directly targets cytotoxic T cell functions during tumor evasion of immune surveillance. Cancer Cell (2005) 8(5):36980.10.1016/j.ccr.2005.10.012

  • 5

    SelaUMauermannNHershkovizRZingerHDayanMCahalonLet alThe inhibition of autoreactive T cell functions by a peptide based on the CDR1 of an anti-DNA autoantibody is via TGF-beta-mediated suppression of LFA-1 and CD44 expression and function. J Immunol (2005) 175(11):725563.10.4049/jimmunol.175.11.7255

  • 6

    Le Floc’hAJalilAVergnonILe Maux ChansacBLazarVBismuthGet alAlpha E beta 7 integrin interaction with E-cadherin promotes antitumor CTL activity by triggering lytic granule polarization and exocytosis. J Exp Med (2007) 204(3):55970.10.1084/jem.20061524

  • 7

    FranciszkiewiczKLe Floc’hAJalilAVigantFRobertTVergnonIet alIntratumoral induction of CD103 triggers tumor-specific CTL function and CCR5-dependent T-cell retention. Cancer Res (2009) 69(15):624955.10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3571

  • 8

    AnikeevaNSomersaloKSimsTNThomasVKDustinMLSykulevY. Distinct role of lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1 in mediating effective cytolytic activity by cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2005) 102(18):643742.10.1073/pnas.0502467102

  • 9

    El-AsadyRYuanRLiuKWangDGressRELucasPJet alTGF-{beta}-dependent CD103 expression by CD8(+) T cells promotes selective destruction of the host intestinal epithelium during graft-versus-host disease. J Exp Med (2005) 201(10):164757.10.1084/jem.20041044

  • 10

    HadleyGACharandeeCWeirMRWangDBartlettSTDrachenbergCB. CD103+ CTL accumulate within the graft epithelium during clinical renal allograft rejection. Transplantation (2001) 72(9):154855.10.1097/00007890-200111150-00013

  • 11

    FengYWangDYuanRParkerCMFarberDLHadleyGA. CD103 expression is required for destruction of pancreatic islet allografts by CD8(+) T cells. J Exp Med (2002) 196(7):87786.10.1084/jem.20020178

  • 12

    YuanREl-AsadyRLiuKWangDDrachenbergCBHadleyGA. Critical role for CD103+CD8+ effectors in promoting tubular injury following allogeneic renal transplantation. J Immunol (2005) 175(5):286879.10.4049/jimmunol.175.5.2868

  • 13

    FujiharaTFujitaHTsubotaKSaitoKTsuzakaKAbeTet alPreferential localization of CD8+ alpha E beta 7+ T cells around acinar epithelial cells with apoptosis in patients with Sjogren’s syndrome. J Immunol (1999) 163(4):222635.

  • 14

    OshitaniNWatanabeKMaedaKFujiwaraYHiguchiKMatsumotoTet alDifferential expression of homing receptor CD103 on lamina propria lymphocytes and association of CD103 with epithelial adhesion molecules in inflammatory bowel disease. Int J Mol Med (2003) 12(5):7159.

  • 15

    DjenidiFAdamJGoubarADurgeauAMeuriceGde MontprevilleVet alCD8+CD103+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes are tumor-specific tissue-resident memory T cells and a prognostic factor for survival in lung cancer patients. J Immunol (2015) 194(7):347586.10.4049/jimmunol.1402711

  • 16

    NizardMRousselHTartourE. Resident memory T cells as surrogate markers of the efficacy of cancer vaccines. Clin Cancer Res (2016) 22(3):5302.10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2364

  • 17

    NizardMRousselHDinizMOKarakiSTranTVoronTet alInduction of resident memory T cells enhances the efficacy of cancer vaccine. Nat Commun (2017) 8:15221.10.1038/ncomms15221

  • 18

    FrenchJJCresswellJWongWKSeymourKCharnleyRMKirbyJA. T cell adhesion and cytolysis of pancreatic cancer cells: a role for E-cadherin in immunotherapy?Br J Cancer (2002) 87(9):103441.10.1038/sj.bjc.6600597

  • 19

    QuinnEHawkinsNYipYLSuterCWardR. CD103+ intraepithelial lymphocytes – a unique population in microsatellite unstable sporadic colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer (2003) 39(4):46975.10.1016/S0959-8049(02)00633-0

  • 20

    WebbJRMilneKWatsonPDeleeuwRJNelsonBH. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes expressing the tissue resident memory marker CD103 are associated with increased survival in high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res (2014) 20(2):43444.10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-1877

  • 21

    MassonFCalzasciaTDi Berardino-BessonWde TriboletNDietrichPYWalkerPR. Brain microenvironment promotes the final functional maturation of tumor-specific effector CD8+ T cells. J Immunol (2007) 179(2):84553.10.4049/jimmunol.179.2.845

  • 22

    MalikBTByrneKTVellaJLZhangPShabanehTBSteinbergSMet alResident memory T cells in the skin mediate durable immunity to melanoma. Sci Immunol (2017) 2(10):eaam6346.10.1126/sciimmunol.aam6346

  • 23

    HombrinkPHelbigCBackerRAPietBOjaAEStarkRet alPrograms for the persistence, vigilance and control of human CD8(+) lung-resident memory T cells. Nat Immunol (2016) 17(12):146778.10.1038/ni.3589

  • 24

    CysterJGSchwabSR. Sphingosine-1-phosphate and lymphocyte egress from lymphoid organs. Annu Rev Immunol (2012) 30:6994.10.1146/annurev-immunol-020711-075011

  • 25

    MackayLKRahimpourAMaJZCollinsNStockATHafonMLet alThe developmental pathway for CD103(+)CD8+ tissue-resident memory T cells of skin. Nat Immunol (2013) 14(12):1294301.10.1038/ni.2744

  • 26

    SkonCNLeeJYAndersonKGMasopustDHogquistKAJamesonSC. Transcriptional downregulation of S1pr1 is required for the establishment of resident memory CD8+ T cells. Nat Immunol (2013) 14(12):128593.10.1038/ni.2745

  • 27

    MurrayTFuertes MarracoSABaumgaertnerPBordryNCagnonLDondaAet alVery late antigen-1 marks functional tumor-resident CD8 T cells and correlates with survival of melanoma patients. Front Immunol (2016) 7:573.10.3389/fimmu.2016.00573

  • 28

    GanesanAPClarkeJWoodOGarrido-MartinEMCheeSJMellowsTet alTissue-resident memory features are linked to the magnitude of cytotoxic T cell responses in human lung cancer. Nat Immunol (2017) 18(8):94050.10.1038/ni.3775

  • 29

    MokraniMKlibiJBluteauDBismuthGMami-ChouaibF. Smad and NFAT pathways cooperate to induce CD103 expression in human CD8 T lymphocytes. J Immunol (2014) 192(5):24719.10.4049/jimmunol.1302192

  • 30

    BoutetMGauthierLLeclercMGrosGde MontprevilleVTheretNet alTGFbeta signaling intersects with CD103 integrin signaling to promote T-lymphocyte accumulation and antitumor activity in the lung tumor microenvironment. Cancer Res (2016) 76(7):175769.10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-1545

  • 31

    ZhangNBevanMJ. Transforming growth factor-beta signaling controls the formation and maintenance of gut-resident memory T cells by regulating migration and retention. Immunity (2013) 39(4):68796.10.1016/j.immuni.2013.08.019

  • 32

    SheridanBSPhamQMLeeYTCauleyLSPuddingtonLLefrancoisL. Oral infection drives a distinct population of intestinal resident memory CD8(+) T cells with enhanced protective function. Immunity (2014) 40(5):74757.10.1016/j.immuni.2014.03.007

  • 33

    YuHShenYHongJXiaQZhouFLiuX. The contribution of TGF-beta in epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT): down-regulation of E-cadherin via snail. Neoplasma (2015) 62(1):115.10.4149/neo_2015_002

  • 34

    HofmannMPircherH. E-cadherin promotes accumulation of a unique memory CD8 T-cell population in murine salivary glands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2011) 108(40):167416.10.1073/pnas.1107200108

  • 35

    HolmgaardRBSchaerDALiYCastanedaSPMurphyMYXuXet alTargeting the TGFbeta pathway with galunisertib, a TGFbetaRI small molecule inhibitor, promotes anti-tumor immunity leading to durable, complete responses, as monotherapy and in combination with checkpoint blockade. J Immunother Cancer (2018) 6(1):47.10.1186/s40425-018-0356-4

  • 36

    PardollDM. The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer (2012) 12(4):25264.10.1038/nrc3239

  • 37

    FourcadeJSunZBenallaouaMGuillaumePLuescherIFSanderCet alUpregulation of Tim-3 and PD-1 expression is associated with tumor antigen-specific CD8+ T cell dysfunction in melanoma patients. J Exp Med (2010) 207(10):217586.10.1084/jem.20100637

  • 38

    WakimLMWoodward-DavisALiuRHuYVilladangosJSmythGet alThe molecular signature of tissue resident memory CD8 T cells isolated from the brain. J Immunol (2012) 189(7):346271.10.4049/jimmunol.1201305

  • 39

    WebbJRMilneKNelsonBH. PD-1 and CD103 are widely coexpressed on prognostically favorable intraepithelial CD8 T cells in human ovarian cancer. Cancer Immunol Res (2015) 3(8):92635.10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-14-0239

  • 40

    BoddupalliCSBarNKadaveruKKrauthammerMPornputtapongNMaiZet alInterlesional diversity of T cell receptors in melanoma with immune checkpoints enriched in tissue-resident memory T cells. JCI Insight (2016) 1(21):e88955.10.1172/jci.insight.88955

  • 41

    BaasMBesanconAGoncalvesTValetteFYagitaHSawitzkiBet alTGFbeta-dependent expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 controls CD8(+) T cell anergy in transplant tolerance. Elife (2016) 5:e08133.10.7554/eLife.08133

  • 42

    OestreichKJYoonHAhmedRBossJM. NFATc1 regulates PD-1 expression upon T cell activation. J Immunol (2008) 181(7):48329.10.4049/jimmunol.181.7.4832

  • 43

    ParkBVFreemanZTGhasemzadehAChattergoonMARutebemberwaASteignerJet alTGFbeta1-mediated SMAD3 enhances PD-1 expression on antigen-specific T cells in cancer. Cancer Discov (2016) 6(12):136681.10.1158/2159-8290.CD-15-1347

  • 44

    GrosARobbinsPFYaoXLiYFTurcotteSTranEet alPD-1 identifies the patient-specific CD8(+) tumor-reactive repertoire infiltrating human tumors. J Clin Invest (2014) 124(5):224659.10.1172/JCI73639

  • 45

    WangPHuangBGaoYYangJLiangZZhangNet alCD103(+)CD8(+) T lymphocytes in non-small cell lung cancer are phenotypically and functionally primed to respond to PD-1 blockade. Cell Immunol (2018) 325:4855.10.1016/j.cellimm.2018.02.002

  • 46

    MilnerJJTomaCYuBZhangKOmilusikKPhanATet alRunx3 programs CD8(+) T cell residency in non-lymphoid tissues and tumours. Nature (2017) 552(7684):2537.10.1038/nature24993

  • 47

    IntlekoferAMTakemotoNWherryEJLongworthSANorthrupJTPalanivelVRet alEffector and memory CD8+ T cell fate coupled by T-bet and eomesodermin. Nat Immunol (2005) 6(12):123644.10.1038/ni1268

  • 48

    ZhouXYuSZhaoDMHartyJTBadovinacVPXueHH. Differentiation and persistence of memory CD8(+) T cells depend on T cell factor 1. Immunity (2010) 33(2):22940.10.1016/j.immuni.2010.08.002

  • 49

    MackayLKMinnichMKragtenNALiaoYNotaBSeilletCet alHobit and Blimp1 instruct a universal transcriptional program of tissue residency in lymphocytes. Science (2016) 352(6284):45963.10.1126/science.aad2035

  • 50

    AmsenDvan GisbergenKHombrinkPvan LierRAW. Tissue-resident memory T cells at the center of immunity to solid tumors. Nat Immunol (2018) 19(6):53846.10.1038/s41590-018-0114-2

  • 51

    GebhardtTPalendiraUTscharkeDCBedouiS. Tissue-resident memory T cells in tissue homeostasis, persistent infection, and cancer surveillance. Immunol Rev (2018) 283(1):5476.10.1111/imr.12650

  • 52

    TophamDJReillyEC. Tissue-resident memory CD8(+) T cells: from phenotype to function. Front Immunol (2018) 9:515.10.3389/fimmu.2018.00515

  • 53

    MackayLKWakimLvan VlietCJJonesCMMuellerSNBannardOet alMaintenance of T cell function in the face of chronic antigen stimulation and repeated reactivation for a latent virus infection. J Immunol (2012) 188(5):21738.10.4049/jimmunol.1102719

  • 54

    YuCIBeckerCWangYMarchesFHelftJLeboeufMet alHuman CD1c+ dendritic cells drive the differentiation of CD103+ CD8+ mucosal effector T cells via the cytokine TGF-beta. Immunity (2013) 38(4):81830.10.1016/j.immuni.2013.03.004

  • 55

    EnamoradoMIborraSPriegoECuetoFJQuintanaJAMartinez-CanoSet alEnhanced anti-tumour immunity requires the interplay between resident and circulating memory CD8(+) T cells. Nat Commun (2017) 8:16073.10.1038/ncomms16073

  • 56

    CaseyKAFraserKASchenkelJMMoranAAbtMCBeuraLKet alAntigen-independent differentiation and maintenance of effector-like resident memory T cells in tissues. J Immunol (2012) 188(10):486675.10.4049/jimmunol.1200402

  • 57

    MackayLKWynne-JonesEFreestoneDPellicciDGMielkeLANewmanDMet alT-box transcription factors combine with the cytokines TGF-beta and IL-15 to control tissue-resident memory T cell fate. Immunity (2015) 43(6):110111.10.1016/j.immuni.2015.11.008

  • 58

    SchenkelJMFraserKACaseyKABeuraLKPaukenKEVezysVet alIL-15-independent maintenance of tissue-resident and boosted effector memory CD8 T cells. J Immunol (2016) 196(9):39206.10.4049/jimmunol.1502337

  • 59

    StruttTMDhumeKFinnCMHwangJHCastonguayCSwainSLet alIL-15 supports the generation of protective lung-resident memory CD4 T cells. Mucosal Immunol (2018) 11(3):66880.10.1038/mi.2017.101

  • 60

    Le Floc’hAJalilAFranciszkiewiczKValidirePVergnonIMami-ChouaibF. Minimal engagement of CD103 on cytotoxic T lymphocytes with an E-cadherin-Fc molecule triggers lytic granule polarization via a phospholipase Cgamma-dependent pathway. Cancer Res (2011) 71(2):32838.10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-2457

  • 61

    FranciszkiewiczKLe Floc’hABoutetMVergnonISchmittAMami-ChouaibF. CD103 or LFA-1 engagement at the immune synapse between cytotoxic T cells and tumor cells promotes maturation and regulates T-cell effector functions. Cancer Res (2013) 73(2):61728.10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-2569

  • 62

    GabrielyGda CunhaAPRezendeRMKenyonBMadiAVandeventerTet alTargeting latency-associated peptide promotes antitumor immunity. Sci Immunol (2017) 2(11):eaaj1738.10.1126/sciimmunol.aaj1738

  • 63

    LiuYLanQLuLChenMXiaZMaJet alPhenotypic and functional characteristic of a newly identified CD8+ Foxp3- CD103+ regulatory T cells. J Mol Cell Biol (2014) 6(1):8192.10.1093/jmcb/mjt026

  • 64

    ZhongHLiuYXuZLiangPYangHZhangXet alTGF-beta-induced CD8(+)CD103(+) regulatory T cells show potent therapeutic effect on chronic graft-versus-host disease lupus by suppressing B cells. Front Immunol (2018) 9:35.10.3389/fimmu.2018.00035

  • 65

    WuHLiaoWLiQLongHYinHZhaoMet alPathogenic role of tissue-resident memory T cells in autoimmune diseases. Autoimmun Rev (2018).10.1016/j.autrev.2018.03.014

  • 66

    KilshawPJMurantSJ. A new surface antigen on intraepithelial lymphocytes in the intestine. Eur J Immunol (1990) 20(10):22017.10.1002/eji.1830201008

  • 67

    PaulsKSchonMKubitzaRCHomeyBWiesenbornALehmannPet alRole of integrin alphaE(CD103)beta7 for tissue-specific epidermal localization of CD8+ T lymphocytes. J Invest Dermatol (2001) 117(3):56975.10.1046/j.0022-202x.2001.01481.x

  • 68

    CuburuNGrahamBSBuckCBKinesRCPangYYDayPMet alIntravaginal immunization with HPV vectors induces tissue-resident CD8+ T cell responses. J Clin Invest (2012) 122(12):460620.10.1172/JCI63287

  • 69

    CresswellJWongWKHenryMJRobertsonHNealDEKirbyJA. Adhesion of lymphocytes to bladder cancer cells: the role of the alpha(E)beta(7) integrin. Cancer Immunol Immunother (2002) 51(9):48391.10.1007/s00262-002-0305-3

  • 70

    AndrewDPRottLSKilshawPJButcherEC. Distribution of alpha 4 beta 7 and alpha E beta 7 integrins on thymocytes, intestinal epithelial lymphocytes and peripheral lymphocytes. Eur J Immunol (1996) 26(4):897905.10.1002/eji.1830260427

  • 71

    DustinMLde FougerollesAR. Reprogramming T cells: the role of extracellular matrix in coordination of T cell activation and migration. Curr Opin Immunol (2001) 13(3):28690.10.1016/S0952-7915(00)00217-X

  • 72

    AlonRDustinML. Force as a facilitator of integrin conformational changes during leukocyte arrest on blood vessels and antigen-presenting cells. Immunity (2007) 26(1):1727.10.1016/j.immuni.2007.01.002

  • 73

    LekHSMorrisonVLConneelyMCampbellPAMcGloinDKlicheSet alThe spontaneously adhesive leukocyte function-associated antigen-1 (LFA-1) integrin in effector T cells mediates rapid actin- and calmodulin-dependent adhesion strengthening to ligand under shear flow. J Biol Chem (2013) 288(21):14698708.10.1074/jbc.M112.430918

  • 74

    HigginsJMMandlebrotDAShawSKRussellGJMurphyEAChenYTet alDirect and regulated interaction of integrin alphaEbeta7 with E-cadherin. J Cell Biol (1998) 140(1):197210.10.1083/jcb.140.1.197

  • 75

    EricssonASvenssonMAryaAAgaceWW. CCL25/CCR9 promotes the induction and function of CD103 on intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes. Eur J Immunol (2004) 34(10):27209.10.1002/eji.200425125

  • 76

    Al-HamidiAPekalskiMRobertsonHAliSKirbyJA. Renal allograft rejection: the contribution of chemokines to the adhesion and retention of alphaE(CD103)beta7 integrin-expressing intratubular T cells. Mol Immunol (2008) 45(15):40007.10.1016/j.molimm.2008.06.011

  • 77

    HadleyGABartlettSTViaCSRostapshovaEAMoainieS. The epithelial cell-specific integrin, CD103 (alpha E integrin), defines a novel subset of alloreactive CD8+ CTL. J Immunol (1997) 159(8):374856.

  • 78

    RobinsonPWGreenSJCarterCCoadwellJKilshawPJ. Studies on transcriptional regulation of the mucosal T-cell integrin alphaEbeta7 (CD103). Immunology (2001) 103(2):14654.10.1046/j.1365-2567.2001.01232.x

  • 79

    LimSPLeungEKrissansenGW. The beta7 integrin gene (Itgb-7) promoter is responsive to TGF-beta1: defining control regions. Immunogenetics (1998) 48(3):18495.10.1007/s002510050422

  • 80

    GauthierLCorgnacSBoutetMGrosGValidirePBismuthGet alPaxillin binding to the cytoplasmic domain of CD103 promotes cell adhesion and effector functions for CD8(+) resident memory T cells in tumors. Cancer Res (2017) 77(24):707282.10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-1487

  • 81

    KutlesaSWesselsJTSpeiserASteiertIMullerCAKleinG. E-cadherin-mediated interactions of thymic epithelial cells with CD103+ thymocytes lead to enhanced thymocyte cell proliferation. J Cell Sci (2002) 115(Pt 23):450515.10.1242/jcs.00142

  • 82

    SchlickumSSennefelderHFriedrichMHarmsGLohseMJKilshawPet alIntegrin alpha E(CD103)beta 7 influences cellular shape and motility in a ligand-dependent fashion. Blood (2008) 112(3):61925.10.1182/blood-2008-01-134833

  • 83

    WangBWuSZengHLiuZDongWHeWet alCD103 tumor infiltrating lymphocytes predict a favorable prognosis in urothelial cell carcinoma of the bladder. J Urol (2015) 194(2):55662.10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.2941

  • 84

    KohJKimSKimMYGoHJeonYKChungDH. Prognostic implications of intratumoral CD103+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma. Oncotarget (2017) 8(8):137629.10.18632/oncotarget.14632

  • 85

    WangZQMilneKDerocherHWebbJRNelsonBHWatsonPH. CD103 and intratumoral immune response in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res (2016) 22(24):62907.10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0732

  • 86

    EdwardsJWilmottJSMadoreJGideTNQuekCTaskerAet alCD103(+) Tumor-resident CD8(+) T cells are associated with improved survival in immunotherapy-naive melanoma patients and expand significantly during anti-PD-1 treatment. Clin Cancer Res (2018) 24(13):303645.10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2257

Summary

Keywords

CD8 tissue resident memory T (TRM) cells, CD103 integrin, cytotoxic T lymphocytes, onco-immunology, cancer immunotherapy

Citation

Corgnac S, Boutet M, Kfoury M, Naltet C and Mami-Chouaib F (2018) The Emerging Role of CD8+ Tissue Resident Memory T (TRM) Cells in Antitumor Immunity: A Unique Functional Contribution of the CD103 Integrin. Front. Immunol. 9:1904. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01904

Received

23 May 2018

Accepted

01 August 2018

Published

15 August 2018

Volume

9 - 2018

Edited by

Susan Kaech, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, United States

Reviewed by

Brian S. Sheridan, Stony Brook University, United States; Nicole L. La Gruta, Monash University, Australia

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Fathia Mami-Chouaib, ,

†Present address: Marie Boutet, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States

Specialty section: This article was submitted to Immunological Memory, a section of the journal Frontiers in Immunology

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics