The Neuroimmune Interplay in Joint Pain: The Role of Macrophages

Abstract

Chronic pain associated with joint disorders, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), osteoarthritis (OA) and implant aseptic loosening (AL), is a highly debilitating symptom that impacts mobility and quality of life in affected patients. The neuroimmune crosstalk has been demonstrated to play a critical role in the onset and establishment of chronic pain conditions. Immune cells release cytokines and immune mediators that can activate and sensitize nociceptors evoking pain, through interaction with receptors in the sensory nerve terminals. On the other hand, sensory and sympathetic nerve fibers release neurotransmitters that bind to their specific receptor expressed on surface of immune cells, initiating an immunomodulatory role. Macrophages have been shown to be key players in the neuroimmune crosstalk. Moreover, macrophages constitute the dominant immune cell population in RA, OA and AL. Importantly, the targeting of macrophages can result in anti-nociceptive effects in chronic pain conditions. Therefore, the aim of this review is to discuss the nature and impact of the interaction between the inflammatory response and nerve fibers in these joint disorders regarding the genesis and maintenance of pain. The role of macrophages is highlighted. The alteration in the joint innervation pattern and the inflammatory response are also described. Additionally, the immunomodulatory role of sensory and sympathetic neurotransmitters is revised.

1 Introduction

Joint diseases, such as osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), are among the most prevalent disabling musculoskeletal disorders (1–3). Osteoarthritis, the most common form of arthritis, is characterized by the degradation of articular cartilage and subchondral bone, osteophytes formation and synovitis, and it is mainly induced by joint injury or overuse (3). On the other hand, RA is a systemic autoimmune disease that results primarily in inflammation and joint damage (4). It has been reported that not only RA and OA prevalence is higher in women, but women also report higher pain levels arising from these conditions than men (5). The mechanisms underlying these sex-related differences are still largely unknown. Psychological factors, body fat mass, sex hormones, and sex-related differences in immune response may account for this sex dimorphism (5). The available therapies do not prevent or revert the progression of these diseases, and in end-stage arthritis, joint replacement surgery is the gold standard procedure to provide pain relief and recover joint function (6, 7). Nevertheless, the slow progressive inflammatory response to the implant debris promotes periprosthetic osteolysis (PPOL) that may result in implant aseptic loosening (AL), a major threat to long-term implant survival (8).

Pain is a common symptom of RA, OA and AL, and has a great impact on the physical function and patients’ wellbeing (9, 10). Radiographic findings of joint degeneration do not always correlate positively with joint pain (11–13). This could be due to the fact that radiography imaging does not allow the assessment inflammatory changes (e.g. synovial hypertrophy and synovitis). To evaluate inflammation ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging-based studies are needed. Inflammatory features are indeed positively and linearly correlated with joint pain (14, 15). These findings identify inflammation as an important predictive factor of pain.

The neuroimmune interplay has been demonstrated to have a key role in the generation and maintenance of pain in diseases with an inflammatory component (16). A diverse repertoire of inflammation-derived mediators can interact with nociceptors and modulate their activity. Among these mediators, pro-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, growth factors and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs- damaged molecules released from damaged or dying cells that bind to pattern recognition receptors [PRRs, e.g., toll-like receptors (TLRs)] (17)) have been shown to interact with receptors in the nociceptors, inducting their sensitization (18, 19). On the other hand, neuropeptides released by sensory nerve endings, such as Substance P (SP) and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), bind to their respective receptors located on the surface of immune cells, modulating their activity (20, 21). The sympathetic neurotransmitters, in particular the norepinephrine, are able to interfere with the inflammatory process, through the adrenoreceptors (ARs) expressed by immune cells (22).

Among the immune cells involved in the neuroimmune interplay, the macrophages have been highlighted as key players in the context of chronic inflammatory diseases (23). Macrophages express the receptors for the neurotransmitters and release mediators able to activate and sensitize nociceptors (24). Moreover, the targeting of macrophages can result in pain reduction (23).

In this narrative review, we discussed the mechanisms underlying the interaction between the inflammatory response and nerve fibers in RA, OA and AL regarding the genesis and maintenance of pain, in particular the role of macrophages was highlighted. The neuronal network and the immune response in joint health and disease are also described. Furthermore, the immunomodulation by the sensory and sympathetic neurotransmitters was revised. The role of neuroimmune interaction in pain has been addressed in recent reviews [e.g (25–30)]. Here, we focus instead on the neuroimmune crosstalk in pain associated to RA, OA, and AL diseases.

2 The Inflammatory Response in Joint Disorders

Although the severity of the immune response is higher in RA and AL, the involvement of an inflammatory component in the OA pathology is also well recognized. Here, the most relevant inflammatory processes in these joint disorders are described.

2.1 Synovial-Resident Macrophages

Synovial joints are characterized by the presence of a fluid-filled joint cavity surrounded by the synovium. The synovium is formed by two layers, the lining and the sub-lining. The lining layer is composed of tissue-resident macrophages and fibroblasts (31). The sub-lining layer is formed by fibroblasts, tissue-resident macrophages, nerves, and blood and lymphatic vessels (31). The disruption of synovial membrane architecture occurs early in joint inflammation (32). Culemann et al. (33) demonstrated that macrophages in the lining layer protect joints from inflammatory immune-cell assaults that are associated with arthritis. The authors studied the origin, differentiation, and distribution of these macrophages during steady-state and arthritis. The barrier-forming macrophages consist of a distinct population of CX3C chemokine receptor 1-positive (CX₃CR1⁺) tissue-resident macrophages and derive from interstitial macrophages CX₃CR1^- in the sub-lining layer (Figure 1) (33). Interestingly, these barrier-forming macrophages express tight junction proteins like the epithelial cells and provide an anti-inflammatory barrier around the joint that is disrupted during arthritis (33). Non-resident macrophages that infiltrate the joint are central effectors of synovial inflammation and arise from circulating monocytes (33).

Figure 1

Healthy synovial fluid lacks immune cell trafficking. Joint inflammation occurs when leukocytes infiltrate the synovial compartment. The severity of joint inflammation correlates with the degree of synovial macrophages infiltration, and depletion of these macrophages has a profound therapeutic benefit (34).

Macrophages are specialized phagocytic (scavenger-like) cells that recognize, ingest, and degrade cellular debris and pathogens. They act both in innate and adaptive immunity and are essential for the maintenance of tissue homeostasis and tissue repair processes. Recently, it was reported that macrophages derived from two main cellular lineages. One lineage emerges from bone-marrow-derived immune cells, the monocytes. The other lineage is monocyte independent, seeded in the tissues during embryonic development, and derived from the yolk sac, fetal liver, and bone marrow (35). Tissue-resident macrophages present a distinctive gene-expression profile, defined by the local microenvironment (36, 37). Adding to this complex origin, macrophages are very plastic cells and are often described as exhibiting a pro-inflammatory phenotype (M1 macrophages) or an anti-inflammatory more prone to tissue repair phenotype (M2 macrophages). Induced by the type 1 helper (Th1) cells signature cytokine (interferon (INF)-γ and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α) and/or the TLRs ligands (e.g. LPS), M1 macrophages secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines and low levels of interleukin (IL)-10. M2 macrophages result from the stimulation of Th2 signature cytokine IL-4 and/or IL-13 and secrete IL-10 and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β (38–40).

2.2 The Inflammatory Response in Osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis is a degenerative disease characterized by articular cartilage destruction, subchondral bone remodeling, synovitis, and osteophyte formation (41) (Figure 1), with higher prevalence in females. Zhu et al. recently demonstrated a strong relationship between the increased levels of proinflammatory cytokines (IL-17F and IL-23) and bone marrow lesions in females but not in males. Therefore, it is critical to unveil the mechanisms underlying sex-related differences. Further studies regarding inflammatory mediators in OA should be performed on animal models of both sexes (42).

Osteoarthritis synovium shows hyperplasia, with an increased number of lining cells and a mixed inflammatory infiltrate. Macrophages are the most abundant immune cell type in the synovium, and their accumulation in the intimal lining is the first signal of synovitis (43). Kraus VB et al. provided the first study in humans demonstrating the involvement of macrophages in OA. Using Single photon emission computed tomography- Non-contrast (SPECT-CT) imaging, after the injection of Etarfolatide, which detects activated macrophages in vivo, the authors observed a correlation between the intensity of Etarfolatide uptake with radiographic severity of joint shrinking and osteophyte formation (44). Activated macrophages release inflammatory mediators, namely TNF-α and IL-1β, that alter the function of synovial fibroblasts and chondrocytes, leading to an increase in inflammation and catabolism in the joints (45). During cartilage degradation, DAMPs released from the extra-cellular matrix (ECM) to the joint space, signal to macrophages to trigger a protective response and eventually lead to repair (17). However, prolonged or dysregulated activation by DAMPs can be destructive and it has been implicated in the perpetuation of the low-grade systemic inflammation observed in OA, by the activation of the inflammasome pathways in macrophages (46). It was recently reported that mouse macrophages that were exposed to cartilage fragments, significantly upregulated genes involved in scavenger activity [phagocytosis, macrophage receptor with collagenous structure (Marco)], integrin-binding activity (migration, Itga5), TNF signaling and TLR signaling (TLR2). These results were further confirmed by immunohistochemical analysis of the synovial tissues obtained from OA patients. Results from RNAs-seq analysis of murine macrophages revealed the expression of MARCO, TLR2 and ITGα5 in the intima lining layer of synovial tissues. Importantly, their inhibition with specific antibodies significantly decreased the release of TNF-α by macrophages stimulated with cartilage byproducts (47). To decode the role of the different joint tissues in synovitis, Belluzi E. et al., cultured the human fibroblasts-like synoviocytes cell line K4IM in the presence of conditioned media (CM) from cartilage, synovial membrane, meniscus and infrapatellar fat pad (IFP) obtained from tissues of patients facing total knee arthroplasty. All the conditions tested led to the production of high levels of IL-6, IL-8, and C-C Motif Chemokine Ligand (CCL2). However, only K4IM cells cultured with CM from OA synovium demonstrated an increase of Il-6, CXCL8, metalloproteinase (MMP)10 and IL-1β expression. These results showed that in OA all joint tissues played a role in the progression of synovial inflammation, in particular the synovial membrane (48). The new findings of synovial macrophage subsets in RA that go beyond the classical M1/M2 concept, could potentiate the development of new therapeutic approaches that promote the resolution of synovial inflammation in OA. The presence of the same cellular subtypes and mechanisms in OA remains unclear and it is under investigation.

2.3 The Inflammatory Response in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis is an autoimmune disease, characterized by synovial inflammation and hyperplasia, the production of autoantibodies (i.e., antibodies that react to self-antigens) to immunoglobulin G [IgG; rheumatoid factor (RF)] and citrullinated proteins [anti-citrullinated proteins antibodies (ACPAs)], and joint destruction. Synovial inflammation is the dominant feature in the early stage of RA (49). The pathology of RA is also characterized by the proliferation and activation of synovial tissue fibroblasts (50), as well as the trafficking of key cellular subsets, namely neutrophils, CD4⁺ T cells (51), B cells (52), and monocytes/macrophages (53) into the synovium, giving rise to an invasive tissue or pannus (Figure 2 and Table 1). These interactions promote the release of several inflammatory mediators, including TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-17, IL-23, IL-10, and TGF-β, which directly affect cartilage and bone cells, thus perpetuating the inflammatory cascade (Figure 2 and Table 1).

Figure 2

2.4 The Inflammatory Response in Aseptic Loosening

The molecular mechanisms responsible for PPOL/AL are still elusive. Tissue inflammation in response to prosthetic byproducts has been pointed to as the main responsible for AL (97). Wear particles released from implant devices that accumulate around the bone-implant interface, induce the release of pro-inflammatory mediators by tissue-resident macrophages (98) (Figure 2). The continuous release of wear particles perpetuates a chronic low-grade inflammation around the implant. This low-grade inflammation promotes the secretion of osteoclastogenic mediators, namely RANKL and IL-1β, which induce the differentiation of macrophages into osteoclasts (99), leading to bone resorption. Vasconcelos DM et al. analyzed the local immune profile and inflammatory response in AL and compared it to OA. The authors concluded that AL and OA differ in tissue architecture, immune cell distribution and local TGF-β1 expression. The results revealed that in OA the inflammation is restricted to the synovial membrane, in turn in AL, macrophages invaded all the periprosthetic tissue. In this study wear particles on aseptic interface tissues did not induce local macrophage polarization (M1 or M2), receptors from both profiles were present and evenly distributed in macrophages. In addition, AL and OA share similar systemic profiles in mRNA levels of the pro-inflammatory makers, namely TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, iNOS and RANKL. Interestingly, an increase of TGF-β1 expression in tissues from AL patients was observed when compared to OA. These results suggest a relation between TGF-β1 expression and the immune response in AL and OA (100). Recently, Dyskova et al. in a pilot study analyzed the inflammation protein signatures in tissues collected from patients with failed total knee arthroscopy due to AL. The authors found that AL tissues presented high levels of TNF-family members [sTNFR2, TNFSF14, sFasL, B cell activating factor belonging to the TNF family (sBAFF)], cytokines and chemokines (IL,8, CCL2, IL1RA/IL36, sIL6R), and growth factors [amphiregulin (sAREG), colony stimulating factor (CSF1)]. Macrophages and osteoclast-like cells are the producers of these inflammatory molecules in AL (101). The sTNFR2 in AL was already reported as having a role in the osteoclast formation, and the absence of sTNFR2 receptors impairs osteoclastogenesis (102). Further studies with a larger patient cohort and using single-cell transcriptomic analysis will be helpful to confirm and identify the key players in AL.

3 The Joint Innervation

The synovial joints are highly innervated by sensory and sympathetic nerve fibers. Changes in the innervation pattern are supposed to contribute to the generation and maintenance of arthritis pain. Here, the joint innervation pattern is described in physiologic and in arthritic conditions.

3.1 The Joint Innervation in Physiological Conditions

Unequivocal evidence has demonstrated the innervation of the capsule, ligaments, synovium, meniscus, fatpads, subchondral bone and periosteum in the synovial joints (103–106). In contrast, in physiologic conditions, articular cartilage is not innervated and does not contain blood vessels (105, 106).

The synovial joints are innervated by sensory thinly myelinated A-δ fibers and unmyelinated peptide-rich C-fibers. The A-δ fibers are mainly present in the capsule, ligaments and meniscus (107). These nerve fibers release the neuropeptides CGRP and SP (108, 109). They are mostly sensitive to nerve growth factor (NGF) and express the tropomyosin receptor kinase A (TrkA) (108, 109). Typically, the A-δ fibers are sensitive to high threshold stimulation, and respond to noxious mechanical stimuli and in a lesser extent to thermal stimuli (108, 109). The unmyelinated C-fibers are the most abundant nerve fibers in the synovial joints (107). As the A-δ fibers, the majority of these C-fiber are peptidergic, releasing SP and CGRP upon activation, and are also TrkA-positive (108, 109). The C-fibers also have a high threshold, and they respond to multi stimuli modalities, such as mechanical, thermal, and chemical stimuli (108, 109). The innervation of joints by A-β myelinated fibers is scarce and mostly restricted to the capsule and ligament surface (107). They have very low thresholds and are sensitive to mechanical stimulation (108, 109). Overall, the joint sensory innervation is mostly composed of silent nociceptors (the C-fibers and the A-δ fibers), which respond only to potentially dangerous stimulation.

Sympathetic nerve fibers innervate the synovial joint structures, except for the articular cartilage (110). These nerve fibers express tyrosine hydroxylase (TH, the rate-limiting enzyme for biosynthesis of catecholamines) and release norepinephrine, and are mostly associated with blood vessels (31). The sympathetic nerves express TrkA, thus they are also influenced by NGF (111). The sympathetic neurotransmitters can modulate indirectly joint pain due to their vascular- and immune-regulatory action, but also through the direct modulation of nociceptors activity (112).

3.2 Alterations in Joint Innervation Pattern in Joint Disorders

Alteration in the pattern of innervation has been described in several pathological conditions. The sprouting of sensory and sympathetic innervation was associated with pain in non-healing bone fractures (113). The sprouting of sensory nerve fibers was also described in bone cancer pain and chronic discogenic pain (114, 115), and the sprouting of sympathetic nerve fiber in neuropathic pain (116). In contrast, repulsion of the sympathetic innervation has been reported in severe chronic inflammatory conditions, such as Crohn’s disease and diabetes (117, 118). Alterations in the innervation pattern have also been described in joint disorders and associated with the severity of pain.

In OA, data from animal models and human studies revealed alterations of both sensory and sympathetic innervation profile. In the OA mouse model induced by the destabilization of the medial meniscus (DMM), an increase in the sensory nerve fibers was observed in the medial synovium, meniscus, and subchondral bone at 6 weeks after OA induction (119). In the same mouse model, our group reported no changes in the sensory innervation of the synovium, meniscus, or subchondral bone 12 weeks after surgery, however, the sensory innervation increased in the periosteum (120). The difference between the two studies might be related to the disease progression stage. In the monoiodacetate (MIA)-induced OA rat model, sprouting of CGRP and TrkA positive fibers was observed in the knee joint (121). The increase in the joint innervation was observed also in human samples. Suri et al. (122). reported that sensory and sympathetic nerve fibers were observed in articular cartilage, following the neovascularization breaching the tidemark, in human samples of the knee with mild and severe OA (122).

Studies in RA animal models also revealed alteration in the joint innervation. The density of sensory (CGRP⁺, NF200⁺) and sympathetic (TH⁺) nerve fibers was increased in the synovium in the Complete Freund’s Adjuvant (CFA)-induced mouse model (123). Interestingly, early and sustained administration of anti-NGF therapy prevented the sprouting of the sensory and sympathetic nerve fibers and reduced the pain-related behaviors in this model, supporting the involvement of nerve sprouting in arthritic pain (123). The sensory (CGRP⁺) and sympathetic (VMAT-2⁺) nerve fibers density was also increased in the synovium of the ankle joint in CFA-induced rat model (124). The inhibition of sympathetic signaling with guanethidine reduced pain-related behaviors, supporting its involvement in joint pain (124). In contrast, a decrease in the sensory innervation of the synovial membrane was observed in the inflammatory CIA mouse model (125). A decrease of the sensory nerve fibers in the synovium was also reported in human OA, and correlated with inflammation (126). This effect may be related to a high degree of inflammation. Further investigation is needed to clarify the putative link between the alteration in the joint innervation profile and the inflammation.

Studies with samples from RA patients reported a loss of sympathetic innervation (127–129) and the magnitude of the sympathetic nerve loss seems to correlate with the degree of inflammation. In fact, comparative studies between RA and OA described the loss of TH⁺ nerve fibers in the synovial tissue of RA patients but not in OA patients (127, 129). In contrast, a higher number of sensory nerve fibers (SP⁺) were detected in the synovial tissues from RA patients when compared to synovial tissues from OA patients (127, 129).

Similarly, our group has reported the absence of sympathetic nerve fibers (TH⁺) in periprosthetic tissues from AL patients, while this was not observed in OA patients (100). This further supports the results reported by Niissallo et al. showing the absence of sympathetic and C-peptidergic nerve fibers from synovial-like membrane [i.e., tissue surrounding the joint implant that has the histological and histochemical characteristics of a synovial-like lining (130)] (131). As described for RA, the loss of TH⁺ fibers seems to correlate with the severity of the inflammatory response. In contrast to Niissalo et al., Ahmed et al. showed that the synovial-like membrane from AL hip prostheses is supplied by sensory nerve fibers positive to SP, neurokinin A (NKA) and CGRP (132). Recently, we also reported the presence of sensory nerve fibers in this tissue (100). However, the organization of the sensory nerve fibers in synovial-like membrane was different from the organization in the synovial membrane in OA patients (100). SP⁺ and CGRP⁺ nerve fibers were observed in subintima regions of the synovial membrane mainly around blood vessels, whereas these nerve fibers were dispersed through the synovial-like membrane (100). In Figure 1 the overall alteration in the innervation pattern are represented.

Although there is still much to know regarding joint innervation, it is clear that under pathological conditions joint innervation undergoes important reorganization that will impact pain transmission.

4 The Neuroimmune Crosstalk in Joint Disorders

The bidirectional communication between the peripheral nervous system and the inflammatory process is recognized to play a critical role in the generation and maintenance of pain (16). In response to noxious stimuli, nociceptors, adding to the generation of action potentials that will be transmitted to the spinal cord, release inflammatory mediators that promote the recruitment of immune cells and modulate their activity (133). On the other hand, the molecules released by the immune cells, such as cytokines, chemokines, lipid mediators and growth factors, will activate nociceptors evoking a pain response (18, 19). In this review, the neuroimmune crosstalk in the context of RA, OA and AL will be discussed.

4.1 The Role of the Inflammatory Mediators on the Nociceptor Activity and Evoked Pain

A diverse repertoire of inflammatory mediators, including cytokines, chemokines and DAMPs, are present at the arthritic joint, and able to activate the nociceptors initiating pain signaling (134, 135).

In OA, DAMPs have been suggested to be involved in the activation and sensitization of nociceptors, in particular by signaling through the TLR4 (136). The TLRs and the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) compose the class of receptors that recognize DAMPs and pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMPs), the pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), which are expressed also in nociceptors (137, 138). The blockade of TLR4 inhibits the release of MCP-1 induced by activation with S100A8 and α2 -macroglobulin (DAMPs molecules) in mouse dorsal root ganglia (DRG) in vitro cultures (138). Nevertheless, the deletion of TLR4 was not sufficient to suppress mechanical allodynia in the DMM mouse model (138). Although TLR4 seems to be involved in OA pain, alone its inhibition is not sufficient to reduce pain sensitization. Interestingly, the expression of S100A8 and S100A9 was not increased in the DMM mouse model, while it was upregulated in samples of OA patients undergoing joint arthroplasty and in the CIA mouse model (139). Moreover, the inhibition of TLR4 by the antagonist TLR4-A1 significantly reduced mechanical allodynia in the MIA rat model (140).

Although TLR4 is the most studied TLRs regarding pain (141), nociceptors express other TLRs, such as TLR2, TLR3, TLR4, TLR5, TLR7 and TLR 9 (141, 142). TLR2 was also shown to be involved in arthritic pain (143). In DRG cultures, the activation of TLR2 by stimulation with 32-mer was shown to induce the expression of the pro-algesic chemokine CCL2 (143). Moreover, the deletion of TLR2 prevented the development of knee hyperalgesia in the DMM mouse model of OA (143). Recently, the involvement of TLR7 activation in OA pain was also demonstrated (144). The algesic effects of miR-21 (miRNA highly released from synovial tissue in OA) are achieved through TLR7 activation (144). The antagonism of TLR7 blocked the miR-21-induced pain and had an analgesic effect in the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Transection (ACLT) OA rat model (144). The available data suggesting the involvements of TLRs in arthritic pain still needs further confirmation.

Pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6 are released by chondrocytes, synoviocytes and infiltrating immune cells in joint disorders such as RA and OA (45, 145). Moreover, nociceptors express the receptors for these cytokines (134).

IL-1β increases the excitability of nociceptors through p38MAP kinase, by delaying the tetrodotoxin (TTX)-resistant voltage-gated sodium channels inactivation and increasing its current threshold (146). The long-term administration of diacerein, a powerful inhibitor of IL-1β synthesis, to patients with moderate to severe knee OA resulted in a significant reduction of pain (147, 148). Moreover, the intraarticular administration of anakinra, an IL-1 receptor antagonist, reduced pain and improved knee function in patients with an acute knee injury (149).

TNF-α is known to directly activate nociceptors through TNF receptor 1 (TNFR1), inducing the up-regulation of voltage-gated sodium channels (Nav1.3 and Nav1.8), and resulting in ectopic impulse and spontaneous discharge of nociceptors, leading to mechanical hyperalgesia (150). The concentration of TNF-α in the synovial fluid positively correlates with the pain intensity in patients with knee OA (151). The neutralization of TNF-α resulted in pain relief in patients with knee OA (152, 153) and antigen-induced arthritis (AIA) rat model (154).

IL-6 was also shown to play a role in the generation and maintenance of arthritic pain. In patients with knee OA, a positive correlation was found between the concentration of IL-6 in the synovial fluid and reported pain (155). The IL-6 signaling depends on the IL-6 binding to gp80 specific receptor (IL-6R) and then to the transmembrane signal-transducing subunit gp130 (156). Sensory neurons were shown to express the gp130 (157). The neutralization of IL-6/sIL-6R complexes by the intra-articular administration of sgp130, reduced the mechanical hyperalgesia during the acute phase of the AIA-arthritis rat model (158). In RA patients, anti-human IL-6 receptor antibody is being tested in clinical trials and show to result in an improvement of RA symptoms, including pain (155, 159).

IL-17 has been considered an important pro-inflammatory cytokine in RA (160), though its pro-nociceptive effects are less studied. The sensory neurons in the mouse DRG were shown to express all the IL-17 receptor subtypes (29). The deletion of IL-17A resulted in the decrease of mechanical hyperalgesia in the AIA mouse model, but it did not interfere with the disease severity (29). In OA, a correlation was found between the levels of IL-17 in the synovial fluid and pain in Knee OA patients (161). Overall, this data suggests a putative role of IL-17 in joint pain in RA, as well as in OA.

The chemokines, which are chemotactic cytokines, were also shown to be a key mediator in arthritic pain. A positive correlation was observed between the concentration of CCL2 in the synovial fluid and pain in knee OA patients (162, 163). The CCL2 receptor, the CCR2, is expressed in sensory neurons, and their activation was shown to sensitize nociceptors through the increase in the Na_v1.8 Na⁺ currents and TRPV1 expression by the activation of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway (164, 165). Moreover, it was shown that CCL2, which is also synthesized by DRG neurons, is involved in the DRG infiltration by macrophages, an important mechanism in arthritis pain. The deletion of CCL2 or CCR2 in mice delays the onset of pain-related behavior in the DMM OA mouse model (166), and the specific deletion of CCR2 inhibited the DRG macrophage infiltration (167).

As referred above, nerve growth factors also contribute to the mechanisms of chronic pain. The blockage of NGF has emerged as a putative analgesic therapy in several diseases, including in OA. The binding of NGF to TrkA increases the nociceptor excitability, by upregulating the expression of TRPV1, bradykinin receptors, purinergic P2X receptors and ion channels, and the synthesis of substance P and CGRP (168). The expression of NGF is known to be upregulated at the inflammatory sites (169). In the DMM OA mouse model, increased NGF mRNA levels were found in the knee joints, and the inhibition of NGF signaling reduced the mechanical hyperalgesia (170). Additionally, a single systemic administration of the anti-NGF antibody AS2886401-00 resulted in a long-term decrease in the gait deficit in the MIA-induced arthritic rat model (171). Additionally, the mRNA expression of TrkA was found to be upregulated in the DRG in the MIA rat model, which was reversed with the pre-treatment with indomethacin (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (172). Moreover, the pre-treatment with indomethacin attenuated NGF-facilitated weight-bearing asymmetry (172). Promising results are coming from ongoing clinical trials with OA patients, in which few administrations of a monoclonal Anti-NGF antibody induce sustained pain relief in moderate to severe OA (173–175). Although issues regarding adverse effects related to the worsening of OA condition led to the interruption of the first clinical trials (176), permission was given to restart these studies.

Autoimmune mechanisms are also suggested to be involved in chronic pain (177). Autoantibodies were identified as molecules that can play a role in the neuroimmune interplay in pain in RA. These molecules were detected in RA patients [e.g. RF and ACPA (178)] and are able to increase nociceptors hyperexcitability, inducing pain (179). The autoantibodies activate the complement system, increasing the inflammatory response and indirectly promoting nociception (177). On the other hand, autoantibodies also interact directly with the nociceptors through binding to the Fc gamma receptors and disrupting the ion channels (177). The injection of ACPA was shown to induce nociception in mice (180). Moreover, it was demonstrated that this effect was associated with the IL-8 produced by the osteoclasts when stimulated by ACPA (180).

Although OA is not considered an autoimmune disease, autoantibodies were also detected in the serum and synovial fluid of OA patients (181), but no relationship between these autoantibodies and OA pain was yet described. Further studies are needed to clarify the role of autoantibodies in RA and OA.

4.1.1 The Role of Macrophages on the Nociceptor Activity and Evoked Pain

The immune system has not always a detrimental role in pain. Although uncontrolled or unresolved acute inflammation evolves to chronic inflammation, which can lead to chronic inflammatory pain (182), the acute inflammatory response has a protective role, promoting tissue repair, and elimination of invading organisms. Macrophages have a pivotal role in acute inflammation and its resolution (183). These cells release mediators, such as maresins (MaRs), that have anti-inflammatory, analgesic and pro-resolving properties (184, 185). Maresins enhance macrophage phagocytosis, and promote the shift of cytokine release to the anti-inflammatory M2 phenotypes, downregulating proinflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α) and increasing the synthesis of anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10 and TGF-β) (183). Specifically, macrophages were shown to promote analgesia via a mechanism dependent on IL-10 signaling in DRG (186). Additionally, the stimulation of M2 macrophages by IL-4 induces the synthesis of opioid peptides [e.g., Met-enkephalin, β-endorphin, and dynorphin A-(1-17)] that bind to the peripheral opioid.

In joint chronic inflammation, macrophages are known to be proinflammatory mediators, such as IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α, as well as NGF and CCL2 (24).

In a previous study, we identified macrophages as the largely dominant infiltrating cell population in the synovial membrane of OA patients and in the synovial-like membrane of AL patients (100). Moreover, SPECT-CT imaging analyses revealed a positive correlation between the number of activated macrophages in the knee and the severity of pain in patients with knee OA (44). Also, in patients with knee OA, the synovial and plasma levels of the CD14 (macrophages marker) correlate positively with pain (187). The pivotal role of macrophages has also been demonstrated in the development of RA (86–88).

Experiments targeting the macrophages confirm the involvement of these cells in the mechanisms of pain in joint disorders. In a rat model of advanced knee arthritis (produced by intra-articular injection of MIA), the depletion of synovial macrophage, via injection of clodronate liposomes, reduced the levels of IL-1β and NGF in the joint, and lead to the suppression of pain (188). It was also shown that the reduction in pain observed after the deletion of CCL2 and CCR2 in the DMM OA mouse model was associated with the suppression of joint levels of CD68 mRNA (macrophage marker), suggesting a role for the CD68 macrophages in the pain development (166). Moreover, the involvement of granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in pain in the CIA mouse model (189) was shown to be achieved via macrophages, which in response to GM-CSF synthesize mediators (CCL17, CCL22, CCR2, IL4ra, Irf4, Nfil3, Socs1, Socs2, and Socs3) that activate the nociceptors (190). This was further confirmed in a study performed in a GM-CSF-dependent CIA mouse model, showing that the neutralization of CCL17 reduces pain, and that the macrophages were the only cells in the synovium expressing CCL17 mRNA (191).

In several pain models, including models of RA and OA, the DRG infiltration by macrophages was identified as a mechanism of pain. A substantial increase in macrophages was reported bilaterally in knee-innervating lumbar level DRG in the AIA rat model, and this coincided with an increase in the expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), a molecule involved in macrophage infiltration (192). Moreover, the inhibition of TNF-α reduced the lumbar DRG infiltration by macrophages and the VCAM-1 expression, as well as the mechanical hyperalgesia (192). In the DMM OA mouse model, an increase in the sensory neuron expression of CCL2 and CCR2 was coincident with the increase in the DRG infiltration by macrophages (167). The deletion of CCR2 was also shown to inhibit the DRG macrophage infiltration and reduce pain-related behaviors (166, 167). Recently, Raoof et al. (193) reported in rat models of OA (MIA and Groove surgery induced OA), that DRG macrophages display an M1-like proinflammatory phenotype, and systemic or local depletion of DRG macrophages reduce OA pain without affecting the pathology (193). Moreover, the inhibition of M1-like macrophages in DRG through intrathecal administration of an IL4-IL10 fusion protein or M2-like macrophages also reduced OA pain (193).

Overall, the described data provides evidence for the involvement of inflammatory mediators such as pro-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines and growth factors in the crosstalk between immune cells and nociceptors, and highlights macrophages as key cell players in this crosstalk. Figure 3 summarizes the described mechanisms of interaction between macrophages and sensory nerve fibers.

Figure 3

4.2 The Role of Sympathetic and Sensory Neurotransmitters on the Inflammatory Response

The nerve fibers locally in inflamed tissues are known to modulate the inflammatory response. Activated nociceptors release into the periphery SP and CGRP, which will affect the inflammatory response. These neurotransmitters are strong vasodilator molecules and chemotactic for innate and adaptive immune cells, and they also modulate the activity of the immune cells (20, 21). Tewari et al. (190) showed that the conditioned medium from NGF-stimulated nociceptors modified macrophages gene transcription, upregulating the expression of inflammatory mediators and chemokines, such as IL-1β, IL6, and CCL22 (190). Moreover, it was shown, in an in vitro experiment, that sensory neurons that innervate the OA knee joint in the rat polarize DRG macrophages into an M1-like phenotype (193).

The binding of SP to the neurokinin-1 receptor expressed in macrophages, promotes an alteration in the macrophage phenotype towards a proinflammatory phenotype, as shown by the up-regulation of IL-1 and TNFα (194). On the other hand, evidence supports the anti-inflammatory role of CGRP (21). For instance, CGRP modulates TLR4-stimulated macrophages by enhancing the levels of regulatory cytokines, such as IL-10, through the activation of CREB-dependent gene transcription (195). Substance P and CGRP are known to be involved in the modulation of inflammatory response (20, 21), and specifically, evidence suggests their involvement in chronic joint inflammations. These neuropeptides were found to be upregulated in the synovial fluid of patients with OA and RA (196). Moreover, upregulate levels of these neuropeptides positively correlated with the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (197). The levels of SP and CGRP were upregulated in the pseudosynovial fluid of implant AL patients (198). The modulation of SP and CGRP might be a putative strategy to reduce inflammation in chronic joint inflammatory conditions, as demonstrated in other inflammatory conditions (199, 200).

Evidence has attributed a pivotal role to sympathetic signaling, in the regulation of chronic inflammatory conditions. The immunomodulatory effects of norepinephrine, the major peripheral catecholamine, can be achieved directly through the activation of the alpha (α) and beta (β) adrenergic receptors (ARs) expressed by the immune cells (22). The stimulation of β2-AR, responsive to high concentrations of norepinephrine, is reported to trigger anti-inflammatory mechanisms on immune cells, whereas the stimulation of β-AR, responsive to high concentrations of norepinephrine, activates pro-inflammatory mechanisms (22).

Studies inducing sympathectomy or the administration of β-AR agonist or antagonists in rodent adjuvant-induced arthritis or CIA models, revealed a dual role of the sympathetic nervous system (201). Proinflammatory effects of norepinephrine were observed at the early phase of the disease and anti-inflammatory effects at the later phase (202, 203). In another mouse model of RA, zymosan-induced arthritis, the administration of β-agonists at initial stages of the disease, induced anti-inflammatory effects, while the administration of α1- and α2-agonists induced either pro- and anti-inflammatory effects, respectively (204). The overall effect depends on the receptor expression profile and on the norepinephrine concentration.

Interestingly, the loss of sympathetic innervation in severely inflamed tissues has been reported (117, 118). In RA, data from animal models and human studies revealed the loss of sympathetic nerve fibers in the synovium (127–129). This absence was also reported in the synovial-like membrane of hip implant aseptic-loosening patients (100). Moreover, this effect is correlated with the harshness of the inflammatory response (127, 129). Comparative studies between RA and OA, and AL and OA, show the reduction of sympathetic innervation in the synovium of RA patients and the synovial like-membrane of AL patients, but not in the synovial membrane of OA patients (100, 127). In RA the loss of sympathetic might be compensated by the appearance of TH⁺ catecholamine-producing cells as observed in the CIA mouse model (128), but not in AL (205).

In implant AL, expression of β2-AR was also shown to be absent in the macrophages in synovial like-membrane of AL patients (205). The stimulation of β2-AR in macrophages induces a shift in their polarization towards an anti-inflammatory phenotype, which acts a way to prevent hyper-inflammation (206). Thus, the absence of β2-AR signaling in macrophages in AL suggest a preferential polarization of macrophages towards a proinflammatory phenotype, which could be underlying the severity of the inflammatory response and the consequent osteolysis. Overall, the local sympathetic nervous system emerges as a putative target to control the inflammatory response in RA and AL.

5 Conclusion

The neuroimmune crosstalk has been investigated in the context of joint disorders regarding chronic pain. The literature reviewed in this manuscript support that RA and OA pain share neuroimmune mechanism. Regarding the AL, the neuroimmune crosstalk remains poorly understood. The information gathered so far demonstrated the ability of inflammatory mediators, such as pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-17), CCL2, and NGF, to interact with receptors in joint nociceptors, inducing their activation and sensitization in OA and RA. Moreover, DAMPs were also reported to be involved through the activation of TLRs expressed in the nociceptors. In this process, the macrophages emerged as the key immune cell player. Experiments targeting the macrophages confirm their involvement in the mechanisms of joint pain.

On the other hand, sensory neurotransmitters are known to modulate inflammatory activity. This immunomodulatory effect in joint disorders is supported by the increased expression levels of SP and CGRP in the synovial fluid of OA, RA, and AL patients. Interestingly, sympathetic immunomodulation seems to be reduced in severe inflammatory conditions like RA and AL. The alterations in the levels of the neurotransmitters positively correlate with inflammation.

The comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms underlying the neuroimmune crosstalk in the context of joint disorders will support the identification of novel therapeutic targets to treat the associated chronic pain.

Acknowledgments

The authors received funding from European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No. 860462 project PREMUROSA.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

• 1

  CrossMSmithEHoyDCarmonaLWolfeFVosTet al. The Global Burden of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Estimates From the Global Burden of Disease 2010 Study. Ann Rheum Dis (2014) 73:1316–22. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204627

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 2

  VerstappenSMMCarmonaL. Epidemiology of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol (2018) 32:167–8. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2018.11.002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3

  AllenKDThomaLMGolightlyYM. Epidemiology of Osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil (2021) 30(2):184–95. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2021.04.020

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 4

  SmolenJSAletahaDMcInnesIB. Rheumatoid Arthritis. Lancet (2016) 388:2023–38. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30173-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5

  KimJRKimHA. Molecular Mechanisms of Sex-Related Differences in Arthritis and Associated Pain. Int J Mol Sci (2020) 21:7938. doi: 10.3390/ijms21217938

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 6

  LearmonthIDYoungCRorabeckC. The Operation of the Century: Total Hip Replacement. Lancet (2007) 370:1508–19. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60457-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7

  LeeJKChoiCH. Total Knee Arthroplasty in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Knee Surg Relat Res (2012) 24:1–6. doi: 10.5792/ksrr.2012.24.1.1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8

  ThieleKPerkaCMatziolisGMayrHOSostheimMHubeR. Current Failure Mechanisms After Knee Arthroplasty Have Changed: Polyethylene Wear Is Less Common in Revision Surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2015) 97:715–20. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.01534

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9

  Sarzi-PuttiniPSalaffiFDi FrancoMBazzichiLCassisiGCasaleRet al. Pain in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Critical Review. Reumatismo (2014) 66:18–27. doi: 10.4081/reumatismo.2014.760

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 10

  KiddBLLangfordRMWodehouseT. Arthritis and Pain. Current Approaches in the Treatment of Arthritic Pain. Arthritis Res Ther (2007) 9:214. doi: 10.1186/ar2147

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 11

  PereiraDSeveroMSantosRABarrosHBrancoJLucasRet al. Knee and Hip Radiographic Osteoarthritis Features: Differences on Pain, Function and Quality of Life. Clin Rheumatol (2016) 35:1555–64. doi: 10.1007/s10067-015-3087-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12

  MurakiSOkaHAkuneTMabuchiAEn-yoYYoshidaMet al. Prevalence of Radiographic Knee Osteoarthritis and Its Association With Knee Pain in the Elderly of Japanese Population-Based Cohorts: The ROAD Study. Osteoarthr Cartil (2009) 17:1137–43. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2009.04.005

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 13

  BedsonJCroftPR. The Discordance Between Clinical and Radiographic Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Search and Summary of the Literature. BMC Musculoskelet Disord (2008) 9:116. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-116

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14

  WuPTShaoCJWuKCWuTTChernTCKuoLCet al. Pain in Patients With Equal Radiographic Grades of Osteoarthritis in Both Knees: The Value of Gray Scale Ultrasound. Osteoarthr Cartil (2012) 20:1507–13. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.08.021

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 15

  GuermaziARoemerFWHayashiDCremaMDNiuJZhangYet al. Assessment of Synovitis With Contrast-Enhanced MRI Using a Whole-Joint Semiquantitative Scoring System in People With, or at High Risk of, Knee Osteoarthritis: The MOST Study. Ann Rheum Dis (2011) 70:805–11. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.139618

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 16

  HoreZDenkF. Neuroimmune Interactions in Chronic Pain - An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Brain Behav Immun (2019) 79:56–62. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2019.04.033

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 17

  RohJSSohnDH. Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns in Inflammatory Diseases. Immune Netw (2018) 18:e27. doi: 10.4110/in.2018.18.e27

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 18

  SlavinKV. Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Neuropathic Pain. Neurotherapeutics (2008) 5:100–6. doi: 10.1016/j.nurt.2007.11.005

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19

  GoldMSGebhartGF. Nociceptor Sensitization in Pain Pathogenesis. Nat Med (2010) 16:1248–57. doi: 10.1038/nm.2235

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 20

  SuvasS. Role of Substance P Neuropeptide in Inflammation, Wound Healing, and Tissue Homeostasis. J Immunol (2017) 199:1543–52. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1601751

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 21

  HolzmannB. Modulation of Immune Responses by the Neuropeptide CGRP. Amino Acids (2013) 45:1–7. doi: 10.1007/s00726-011-1161-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 22

  PongratzGStraubRH. The Sympathetic Nervous Response in Inflammation. Arthritis Res Ther (2014) 16:504. doi: 10.1186/s13075-014-0504-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 23

  LiuJAYuJCheungCW. Immune Actions on the Peripheral Nervous System in Pain. Int J Mol Sci (2021) 22(3):1448. doi: 10.3390/ijms22031448

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 24

  ZhangHCaiDBaiX. Macrophages Regulate the Progression of Osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil (2020) 28:555–61. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2020.01.007

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 25

  ChenODonnellyCRJiRR. Regulation of Pain by Neuro-Immune Interactions Between Macrophages and Nociceptor Sensory Neurons. Curr Opin Neurobiol (2020) 62:17–25. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2019.11.006

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 26

  SommerCLeindersMUceylerN. Inflammation in the Pathophysiology of Neuropathic Pain. Pain (2018) 159:595–602. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001122

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 27

  GeraghtyTWinterDRMillerRJMillerREMalfaitAM. Neuroimmune Interactions and Osteoarthritis Pain: Focus on Macrophages. Pain Rep (2021) 6:e892. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000892

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 28

  MalcangioM. Role of the Immune System in Neuropathic Pain. Scand J Pain (2019) 20:33–7. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2019-0138

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 29

  EbbinghausMNaturaGSegond von BanchetGHensellekSBottcherMHoffmannBet al. Interleukin-17A Is Involved in Mechanical Hyperalgesia But Not in the Severity of Murine Antigen-Induced Arthritis. Sci Rep (2017) 7:10334. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10509-5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 30

  MillerRJMalfaitAMMillerRE. The Innate Immune Response as a Mediator of Osteoarthritis Pain. Osteoarthr Cartil (2020) 28:562–71. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2019.11.006

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31

  SmithMD. The Normal Synovium. Open Rheumatol J (2011) 5:100–6. doi: 10.2174/1874312901105010100

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 32

  WechalekarMDNajmAVealeDJStrandV. The 2018 OMERACT Synovial Tissue Biopsy Special Interest Group Report on Standardization of Synovial Biopsy Analysis. J Rheumatol (2019) 46:1365–8. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.181062

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 33

  CulemannSGruneboomANicolas-AvilaJAWeidnerDLammleKFRotheTet al. Locally Renewing Resident Synovial Macrophages Provide a Protective Barrier for the Joint. Nature (2019) 572:670–5. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1471-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 34

  DengCZhangQHePZhouBHeKSunXet al. Targeted Apoptosis of Macrophages and Osteoclasts in Arthritic Joints Is Effective Against Advanced Inflammatory Arthritis. Nat Commun (2021) 12:2174. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22454-z

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 35

  DaviesLCJenkinsSJAllenJETaylorPR. Tissue-Resident Macrophages. Nat Immunol (2013) 14:986–95. doi: 10.1038/ni.2705

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 36

  LavinYWinterDBlecher-GonenRDavidEKeren-ShaulHMeradMet al. Tissue-Resident Macrophage Enhancer Landscapes Are Shaped by the Local Microenvironment. Cell (2014) 159:1312–26. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.018

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 37

  BuechlerMBKimKWOnuferEJWilliamsJWLittleCCDominguezCXet al. A Stromal Niche Defined by Expression of the Transcription Factor WT1 Mediates Programming and Homeostasis of Cavity-Resident Macrophages. Immunity (2019) 51:119–30.e115. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.05.010

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 38

  WynnTAChawlaAPollardJW. Macrophage Biology in Development, Homeostasis and Disease. Nature (2013) 496:445–55. doi: 10.1038/nature12034

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 39

  GinhouxFSchultzeJLMurrayPJOchandoJBiswasSK. New Insights Into the Multidimensional Concept of Macrophage Ontogeny, Activation and Function. Nat Immunol (2016) 17:34–40. doi: 10.1038/ni.3324

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 40

  PhanATGoldrathAWGlassCK. Metabolic and Epigenetic Coordination of T Cell and Macrophage Immunity. Immunity (2017) 46:714–29. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.04.016

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 41

  LoeserRFGoldringSRScanzelloCRGoldringMB. Osteoarthritis: A Disease of the Joint as an Organ. Arthritis Rheum (2012) 64:1697–707. doi: 10.1002/art.34453

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 42

  ZhuZOtahalPWangBJinXLaslettLLWlukaAEet al. Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Associations Between Serum Inflammatory Cytokines and Knee Bone Marrow Lesions in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil (2017) 25:499–505. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2016.10.024

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 43

  FarahatMNYanniGPostonRPanayiGS. Cytokine Expression in Synovial Membranes of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis and Osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis (1993) 52:870–5. doi: 10.1136/ard.52.12.870

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 44

  KrausVBMcDanielGHuebnerJLStablerTVPieperCFShipesSWet al. Direct In Vivo Evidence of Activated Macrophages in Human Osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil (2016) 24:1613–21. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2016.04.010

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 45

  BondesonJBlomABWainwrightSHughesCCatersonBvan den BergWB. The Role of Synovial Macrophages and Macrophage-Produced Mediators in Driving Inflammatory and Destructive Responses in Osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum (2010) 62:647–57. doi: 10.1002/art.27290

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 46

  RobinsonWHLepusCMWangQRaghuHMaoRLindstromTMet al. Low-Grade Inflammation as a Key Mediator of the Pathogenesis of Osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol (2016) 12:580–92. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2016.136

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 47

  HamasakiMTerkawiMAOnoderaTTianYEbataTMatsumaeGet al. Transcriptional Profiling of Murine Macrophages Stimulated With Cartilage Fragments Revealed a Strategy for Treatment of Progressive Osteoarthritis. Sci Rep (2020) 10:7558. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64515-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 48

  BelluzziEOlivottoETosoGCigolottiAPozzuoliABizCet al. Conditioned Media From Human Osteoarthritic Synovium Induces Inflammation in a Synoviocyte Cell Line. Connect Tissue Res (2019) 60:136–45. doi: 10.1080/03008207.2018.1470167

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 49

  McInnesIBSchettG. The Pathogenesis of Rheumatoid Arthritis. N Engl J Med (2011) 365:2205–19. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1004965

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 50

  Muller-LadnerUKriegsmannJFranklinBNMatsumotoSGeilerTGayREet al. Synovial Fibroblasts of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Attach to and Invade Normal Human Cartilage When Engrafted Into SCID Mice. Am J Pathol (1996) 149:1607–15.

  • Google Scholar

• 51

  NamekawaTWagnerUGGoronzyJJWeyandCM. Functional Subsets of CD4 T Cells in Rheumatoid Synovitis. Arthritis Rheum (1998) 41:2108–16. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199812)41:12<2108::AID-ART5>3.0.CO;2-Q

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 52

  PelletierJPMartel-PelletierJAbramsonSB. Osteoarthritis, an Inflammatory Disease: Potential Implication for the Selection of New Therapeutic Targets. Arthritis Rheum (2001) 44:1237–47. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200106)44:6<1237::AID-ART214>3.0.CO;2-F

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 53

  KinneRWBrauerRStuhlmullerBPalombo-KinneEBurmesterGR. Macrophages in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Res (2000) 2:189–202. doi: 10.1186/ar86

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 54

  FilerA. The Fibroblast as a Therapeutic Target in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Curr Opin Pharmacol (2013) 13:413–9. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2013.02.006

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 55

  BuckleyCD. Why Does Chronic Inflammation Persist: An Unexpected Role for Fibroblasts. Immunol Lett (2011) 138:12–4. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2011.02.010

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 56

  DillerMHasseliRHulserMLAykaraIFrommerKRehartSet al. Targeting Activated Synovial Fibroblasts in Rheumatoid Arthritis by Peficitinib. Front Immunol (2019) 10:541. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00541

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 57

  WeiKKorsunskyIMarshallJLGaoAWattsGFMMajorTet al. Notch Signalling Drives Synovial Fibroblast Identity and Arthritis Pathology. Nature (2020) 582:259–64. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2222-z

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 58

  CroftAPCamposJJansenKTurnerJDMarshallJAttarMet al. Distinct Fibroblast Subsets Drive Inflammation and Damage in Arthritis. Nature (2019) 570:246–51. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1263-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 59

  KlaasenRThurlingsRMWijbrandtsCAvan KuijkAWBaetenDGerlagDMet al. The Relationship Between Synovial Lymphocyte Aggregates and the Clinical Response to Infliximab in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Prospective Study. Arthritis Rheum (2009) 60:3217–24. doi: 10.1002/art.24913

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 60

  ChatzidionysiouKLieENasonovELukinaGHetlandMLTarpUet al. Highest Clinical Effectiveness of Rituximab in Autoantibody-Positive Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis and in Those for Whom No More Than One Previous TNF Antagonist has Failed: Pooled Data From 10 European Registries. Ann Rheum Dis (2011) 70:1575–80. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.148759

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 61

  OtaYNiiroHOtaSUekiNTsuzukiHNakayamaTet al. Generation Mechanism of RANKL(+) Effector Memory B Cells: Relevance to the Pathogenesis of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther (2016) 18:67. doi: 10.1186/s13075-016-0957-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 62

  TakemuraSKlimiukPABraunAGoronzyJJWeyandCM. T Cell Activation in Rheumatoid Synovium Is B Cell Dependent. J Immunol (2001) 167:4710–8. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.8.4710

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 63

  EdwardsJCSzczepanskiLSzechinskiJFilipowicz-SosnowskaAEmeryPCloseDRet al. Efficacy of B-Cell-Targeted Therapy With Rituximab in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis. N Engl J Med (2004) 350:2572–81. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032534

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 64

  KaibaraNYamadaHShutoTNakashimaYOkazakiKMiyaharaHet al. Comparative Histopathological Analysis Between Tenosynovitis and Joint Synovitis in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Histopathology (2008) 52:856–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2008.03050.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 65

  PanayiGS. Even Though T-Cell-Directed Trials Have Been of Limited Success, Is There Reason for Optimism? Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol (2006) 2:58–9. doi: 10.1038/ncprheum0094

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 66

  Schulze-KoopsHKaldenJR. The Balance of Th1/Th2 Cytokines in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol (2001) 15:677–91. doi: 10.1053/berh.2001.0187

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 67

  PeneJChevalierSPreisserLVenereauEGuilleuxMHGhannamSet al. Chronically Inflamed Human Tissues Are Infiltrated by Highly Differentiated Th17 Lymphocytes. J Immunol (2008) 180:7423–30. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.11.7423

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 68

  CaoDMalmstromVBaecher-AllanCHaflerDKlareskogLTrollmoC. Isolation and Functional Characterization of Regulatory CD25brightCD4+ T Cells From the Target Organ of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis. Eur J Immunol (2003) 33:215–23. doi: 10.1002/immu.200390024

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 69

  van AmelsfortJMJacobsKMBijlsmaJWLafeberFPTaamsLS. CD4(+)CD25(+) Regulatory T Cells in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Differences in the Presence, Phenotype, and Function Between Peripheral Blood and Synovial Fluid. Arthritis Rheum (2004) 50:2775–85. doi: 10.1002/art.20499

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 70

  ChowdhuryKKumarUDasSChaudhuriJKumarPKanjilalMet al. Synovial IL-9 Facilitates Neutrophil Survival, Function and Differentiation of Th17 Cells in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther (2018) 20:18. doi: 10.1186/s13075-017-1505-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 71

  CicciaFGugginoGRizzoAManzoAVitoloBLa MannaMPet al. Potential Involvement of IL-9 and Th9 Cells in the Pathogenesis of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Rheumatol (Oxf) (2015) 54:2264–72. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev252

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 72

  RaoDAGurishMFMarshallJLSlowikowskiKFonsekaCYLiuYet al. Pathologically Expanded Peripheral T Helper Cell Subset Drives B Cells in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Nature (2017) 542:110–4. doi: 10.1038/nature20810

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 73

  MeradMSathePHelftJMillerJMorthaA. The Dendritic Cell Lineage: Ontogeny and Function of Dendritic Cells and Their Subsets in the Steady State and the Inflamed Setting. Annu Rev Immunol (2013) 31:563–604. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-020711-074950

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 74

  ZvaiflerNJSteinmanRMKaplanGLauLLRivelisM. Identification of Immunostimulatory Dendritic Cells in the Synovial Effusions of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis. J Clin Invest (1985) 76:789–800. doi: 10.1172/JCI112036

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 75

  LebreMCJongbloedSLTasSWSmeetsTJMcInnesIBTakPP. Rheumatoid Arthritis Synovium Contains Two Subsets of CD83-DC-LAMP- Dendritic Cells With Distinct Cytokine Profiles. Am J Pathol (2008) 172:940–50. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2008.070703

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 76

  YuMBLangridgeWHR. The Function of Myeloid Dendritic Cells in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Rheumatol Int (2017) 37:1043–51. doi: 10.1007/s00296-017-3671-z

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 77

  PettitARQuinnCMacDonaldKPCavanaghLLThomasGTownsendWet al. Nuclear Localization of RelB Is Associated With Effective Antigen-Presenting Cell Function. J Immunol (1997) 159:3681–91.

  • Google Scholar

• 78

  MoretFMHackCEvan der Wurff-JacobsKMde JagerWRadstakeTRLafeberFPet al. Intra-Articular CD1c-Expressing Myeloid Dendritic Cells From Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Express a Unique Set of T Cell-Attracting Chemokines and Spontaneously Induce Th1, Th17 and Th2 Cell Activity. Arthritis Res Ther (2013) 15:R155. doi: 10.1186/ar4338

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 79

  WipkeBTAllenPM. Essential Role of Neutrophils in the Initiation and Progression of a Murine Model of Rheumatoid Arthritis. J Immunol (2001) 167:1601–8. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.3.1601

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 80

  MonachPANigrovicPAChenMHockHLeeDMBenoistCet al. Neutrophils in a Mouse Model of Autoantibody-Mediated Arthritis: Critical Producers of Fc Receptor Gamma, the Receptor for C5a, and Lymphocyte Function-Associated Antigen 1. Arthritis Rheum (2010) 62:753–64. doi: 10.1002/art.27238

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 81

  CecchiIArias de la RosaIMenegattiERoccatelloDCollantes-EstevezELopez-PedreraCet al. Neutrophils: Novel Key Players in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Current and Future Therapeutic Targets. Autoimmun Rev (2018) 17:1138–49. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2018.06.006

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 82

  TalbotJBianchiniFJNascimentoDCOliveiraRDSoutoFOPintoLGet al. CCR2 Expression in Neutrophils Plays a Critical Role in Their Migration Into the Joints in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol (2015) 67:1751–9. doi: 10.1002/art.39117

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 83

  SadikCDKimNDIwakuraYLusterAD. Neutrophils Orchestrate Their Own Recruitment in Murine Arthritis Through C5aR and FcgammaR Signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2012) 109:E3177–85. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1213797109

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 84

  Barcellos-de-SouzaPCanettiCBarja-FidalgoCArrudaMA. Leukotriene B(4) Inhibits Neutrophil Apoptosis via NADPH Oxidase Activity: Redox Control of NF-kappaB Pathway and Mitochondrial Stability. Biochim Biophys Acta (2012) 1823:1990–7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2012.07.012

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 85

  YahagiASaikaTHiranoHTakai-ImamuraMTsujiFAonoHet al. IL-6-PAD4 Axis in the Earliest Phase of Arthritis in Knock-in Gp130f759 Mice, a Model for Rheumatoid Arthritis. RMD Open (2019) 5:e000853. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000853

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 86

  ZhangFWeiKSlowikowskiKFonsekaCYRaoDAKellySet al. Defining Inflammatory Cell States in Rheumatoid Arthritis Joint Synovial Tissues by Integrating Single-Cell Transcriptomics and Mass Cytometry. Nat Immunol (2019) 20:928–42. doi: 10.1038/s41590-019-0378-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 87

  BarreraPBlomAvan LentPLvan BlooisLBeijnenJHvan RooijenNet al. Synovial Macrophage Depletion With Clodronate-Containing Liposomes in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Rheum (2000) 43:1951–9. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200009)43:9<1951::AID-ANR5>3.0.CO;2-K

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 88

  HaringmanJJGerlagDMZwindermanAHSmeetsTJKraanMCBaetenDet al. Synovial Tissue Macrophages: A Sensitive Biomarker for Response to Treatment in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis (2005) 64:834–8. doi: 10.1136/ard.2004.029751

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 89

  AliverniniSMacDonaldLElmesmariAFinlaySTolussoBGiganteMRet al. Distinct Synovial Tissue Macrophage Subsets Regulate Inflammation and Remission in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Nat Med (2020) 26:1295–306. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0939-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 90

  XuKXuPYaoJFZhangYGHouWKLuSM. Reduced Apoptosis Correlates With Enhanced Autophagy in Synovial Tissues of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Inflamm Res (2013) 62:229–37. doi: 10.1007/s00011-012-0572-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 91

  KennedyAFearonUVealeDJGodsonC. Macrophages in Synovial Inflammation. Front Immunol (2011) 2:52. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2011.00052

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 92

  YeLWenZLiYChenBYuTLiuLet al. Interleukin-10 Attenuation of Collagen-Induced Arthritis Is Associated With Suppression of Interleukin-17 and Retinoid-Related Orphan Receptor Gammat Production in Macrophages and Repression of Classically Activated Macrophages. Arthritis Res Ther (2014) 16:R96. doi: 10.1186/ar4544

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 93

  ZhuWLiXFangSZhangXWangYZhangTet al. Anti-Citrullinated Protein Antibodies Induce Macrophage Subset Disequilibrium in RA Patients. Inflammation (2015) 38:2067–75. doi: 10.1007/s10753-015-0188-z

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 94

  YangXLiSZhaoYLiSZhaoTTaiYet al. GRK2 Mediated Abnormal Transduction of PGE2-EP4-cAMP-CREB Signaling Induces the Imbalance of Macrophages Polarization in Collagen-Induced Arthritis Mice. Cells (2019) 8(12):1596. doi: 10.3390/cells8121596

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 95

  HasegawaTKikutaJSudoTMatsuuraYMatsuiTSimmonsSet al. Identification of a Novel Arthritis-Associated Osteoclast Precursor Macrophage Regulated by Foxm1. Nat Immunol (2019) 20:1631–43. doi: 10.1038/s41590-019-0526-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 96

  KuoDDingJCohnISZhangFWeiKRaoDAet al. HBEGF(+) Macrophages in Rheumatoid Arthritis Induce Fibroblast Invasiveness. Sci Transl Med (2019) 11(491):1–13. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aau8587

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 97

  GalloJVaculovaJGoodmanSBKonttinenYTThyssenJP. Contributions of Human Tissue Analysis to Understanding the Mechanisms of Loosening and Osteolysis in Total Hip Replacement. Acta Biomater (2014) 10:2354–66. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.02.003

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 98

  CyndariKIGoodheartJRMillerMAOestMEDamronTAMannKA. Peri-Implant Distribution of Polyethylene Debris in Postmortem-Retrieved Knee Arthroplasties: Can Polyethylene Debris Explain Loss of Cement-Bone Interlock in Successful Total Knee Arthroplasties? J Arthroplasty (2017) 32:2289–300. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.047

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 99

  MukkaSSAnderssonGNHultenbyKRSkoldenbergOGNordahlJPEislerTM. Osteoclasts in Periprosthetic Osteolysis: The Charnley Arthroplasty Revisited. J Arthroplasty (2017) 32:3219–27. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.05.030

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 100

  VasconcelosDMRibeiro-da-SilvaMMateusAAlvesCJMachadoGCMachado-SantosJet al. Immune Response and Innervation Signatures in Aseptic Hip Implant Loosening. J Transl Med (2016) 14:205. doi: 10.1186/s12967-016-0950-5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 101

  DyskovaTKriegovaESlobodovaZZehnalovaSKudelkaMSchneiderovaPet al. Inflammation Time-Axis in Aseptic Loosening of Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Preliminary Study. PloS One (2019) 14:e0221056. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221056

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 102

  NasonRJungJYCholeRA. Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Osteoclastogenesis From Mononuclear Precursors: A Mechanism for Osteolysis in Chronic Otitis. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol (2009) 10:151–60. doi: 10.1007/s10162-008-0153-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 103

  BelluzziEStoccoEPozzuoliAGranzottoMPorzionatoAVettorRet al. Contribution of Infrapatellar Fat Pad and Synovial Membrane to Knee Osteoarthritis Pain. BioMed Res Int (2019) 2019:6390182. doi: 10.1155/2019/6390182

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 104

  HukkanenMKonttinenYTReesRGSantavirtaSTerenghiGPolakJM. Distribution of Nerve Endings and Sensory Neuropeptides in Rat Synovium, Meniscus and Bone. Int J Tissue React (1992) 14:1–10.

  • Google Scholar

• 105

  BumaPElmansLVan Den BergWBSchramaLH. Neurovascular Plasticity in the Knee Joint of an Arthritic Mouse Model. Anat Rec (2000) 260:51–61. doi: 10.1002/1097-0185(20000901)260:1<51::AID-AR60>3.0.CO;2-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 106

  BumaPVerschurenCVersleyenDvan der KraanPOestreicherAB. Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide, Substance P and GAP-43/B-50 Immunoreactivity in the Normal and Arthrotic Knee Joint of the Mouse. Histochemistry (1992) 98:327–39. doi: 10.1007/BF00270017

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 107

  GriggP. Properties of Sensory Neurons Innervating Synovial Joints. Cells Tissues Organs (2001) 169:218–25. doi: 10.1159/000047885

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 108

  MantyhPW. The Neurobiology of Skeletal Pain. Eur J Neurosci (2014) 39:508–19. doi: 10.1111/ejn.12462

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 109

  BasbaumAIBautistaDMScherrerGJuliusD. Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Pain. Cell (2009) 139:267–84. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.09.028

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 110

  AckermannPWLiJFinnAAhmedMKreicbergsA. Autonomic Innervation of Tendons, Ligaments and Joint Capsules. A Morphologic and Quantitative Study in the Rat. J Orthop Res (2001) 19:372–8. doi: 10.1016/S0736-0266(00)90029-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 111

  FaganAMZhangHLandisSSmeyneRJSilos-SantiagoIBarbacidM. TrkA, But Not TrkC, Receptors Are Essential for Survival of Sympathetic Neurons In Vivo. J Neurosci (1996) 16:6208–18. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-19-06208.1996

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 112

  PongratzGStraubRH. Role of Peripheral Nerve Fibres in Acute and Chronic Inflammation in Arthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol (2013) 9:117–26. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2012.181

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 113

  ChartierSRThompsonMLLongoGFealkMNMajutaLAMantyhPW. Exuberant Sprouting of Sensory and Sympathetic Nerve Fibers in Nonhealed Bone Fractures and the Generation and Maintenance of Chronic Skeletal Pain. Pain (2014) 155:2323–36. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.08.026

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 114

  BloomAPJimenez-AndradeJMTaylorRNCastaneda-CorralGKaczmarskaMJFreemanKTet al. Breast Cancer-Induced Bone Remodeling, Skeletal Pain, and Sprouting of Sensory Nerve Fibers. J Pain (2011) 12:698–711. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.12.016

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 115

  FreemontAJWatkinsALe MaitreCBairdPJeziorskaMKnightMTet al. Nerve Growth Factor Expression and Innervation of the Painful Intervertebral Disc. J Pathol (2002) 197:286–92. doi: 10.1002/path.1108

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 116

  NascimentoFPMagnussenCYousefpourNRibeiro-da-SilvaA. Sympathetic Fibre Sprouting in the Skin Contributes to Pain-Related Behaviour in Spared Nerve Injury and Cuff Models of Neuropathic Pain. Mol Pain (2015) 11:59. doi: 10.1186/s12990-015-0062-x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 117

  StraubRHGrumFStrauchUCapellinoSBatailleFBleichAet al. Anti-Inflammatory Role of Sympathetic Nerves in Chronic Intestinal Inflammation. Gut (2008) 57:911–21. doi: 10.1136/gut.2007.125401

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 118

  MeiQMundingerTOLernmarkATaborskyGJJr. Early, Selective, and Marked Loss of Sympathetic Nerves From the Islets of BioBreeder Diabetic Rats. Diabetes (2002) 51:2997–3002. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.51.10.2997

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 119

  ObeidatAMMillerREMillerRJMalfaitAM. The Nociceptive Innervation of the Normal and Osteoarthritic Mouse Knee. Osteoarthr Cartil (2019) 27:1669–79. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2019.07.012

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 120

  AlvesCJCoutoMSousaDMMagalhaesANetoELeitaoLet al. Nociceptive Mechanisms Driving Pain in a Post-Traumatic Osteoarthritis Mouse Model. Sci Rep (2020) 10:15271. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72227-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 121

  AsoKIzumiMSugimuraNOkanoueYUshidaTIkeuchiM. Nociceptive Phenotype Alterations of Dorsal Root Ganglia Neurons Innervating the Subchondral Bone in Osteoarthritic Rat Knee Joints. Osteoarthr Cartil (2016) 24:1596–603. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2016.04.009

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 122

  SuriSGillSEMassena de CaminSWilsonDMcWilliamsDFWalshDA. Neurovascular Invasion at the Osteochondral Junction and in Osteophytes in Osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis (2007) 66:1423–8. doi: 10.1136/ard.2006.063354

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 123

  GhilardiJRFreemanKTJimenez-AndradeJMCoughlinKAKaczmarskaMJCastaneda-CorralGet al. Neuroplasticity of Sensory and Sympathetic Nerve Fibers in a Mouse Model of a Painful Arthritic Joint. Arthritis Rheum (2012) 64:2223–32. doi: 10.1002/art.34385

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 124

  LongoGOsikowiczMRibeiro-da-SilvaA. Sympathetic Fiber Sprouting in Inflamed Joints and Adjacent Skin Contributes to Pain-Related Behavior in Arthritis. J Neurosci (2013) 33:10066–74. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5784-12.2013

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 125

  MurakamiKNakagawaHNishimuraKMatsuoS. Changes in Peptidergic Fiber Density in the Synovium of Mice With Collagenase-Induced Acute Arthritis. Can J Physiol Pharmacol (2015) 93:435–41. doi: 10.1139/cjpp-2014-0446

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 126

  EitnerAPesterJNietzscheSHofmannGOSchaibleHG. The Innervation of Synovium of Human Osteoarthritic Joints in Comparison With Normal Rat and Sheep Synovium. Osteoarthr Cartil (2013) 21:1383–91. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.06.018

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 127

  MillerLEJustenHPScholmerichJStraubRH. The Loss of Sympathetic Nerve Fibers in the Synovial Tissue of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Is Accompanied by Increased Norepinephrine Release From Synovial Macrophages. FASEB J (2000) 14:2097–107. doi: 10.1096/fj.99-1082com

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 128

  CapellinoSCosentinoMWolffCSchmidtMGrifkaJStraubRH. Catecholamine-Producing Cells in the Synovial Tissue During Arthritis: Modulation of Sympathetic Neurotransmitters as New Therapeutic Target. Ann Rheum Dis (2010) 69:1853–60. doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.119701

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 129

  WeidlerCHolzerCHarbuzMHofbauerRAngelePScholmerichJet al. Low Density of Sympathetic Nerve Fibres and Increased Density of Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor Positive Cells in RA Synovium. Ann Rheum Dis (2005) 64:13–20. doi: 10.1136/ard.2003.016154

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 130

  GoldringSRSchillerALRoelkeMRourkeCMO'NeilDAHarrisWH. The Synovial-Like Membrane at the Bone-Cement Interface in Loose Total Hip Replacements and Its Proposed Role in Bone Lysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am (1983) 65:575–84.

  • Google Scholar

• 131

  NiissaloSLiTFSantavirtaSTakagiMHietanenJKonttinenYT. Dense Innervation in Pseudocapsular Tissue Compared to Aneural Interface Tissue in Loose Totally Replaced Hips. J Rheumatol (2002) 29:796–803.

  • Google Scholar

• 132

  AhmedMBergstromJLundbladHGillespieWJKreicbergsA. Sensory Nerves in the Interface Membrane of Aseptic Loose Hip Prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br (1998) 80:151–5. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.80b1.8138

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 133

  BaralPUditSChiuIM. Pain and Immunity: Implications for Host Defence. Nat Rev Immunol (2019) 19:433–47. doi: 10.1038/s41577-019-0147-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 134

  SchaibleHG. Nociceptive Neurons Detect Cytokines in Arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther (2014) 16:470. doi: 10.1186/s13075-014-0470-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 135

  MillerREMillerRJMalfaitAM. Osteoarthritis Joint Pain: The Cytokine Connection. Cytokine (2014) 70:185–93. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2014.06.019

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 136

  GomezRVillalvillaALargoRGualilloOHerrero-BeaumontG. TLR4 Signalling in Osteoarthritis–Finding Targets for Candidate DMOADs. Nat Rev Rheumatol (2015) 11:159–70. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2014.209

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 137

  KatoJAgalaveNMSvenssonCI. Pattern Recognition Receptors in Chronic Pain: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications. Eur J Pharmacol (2016) 788:261–73. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2016.06.039

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 138

  MillerREBelmadaniAIshiharaSTranPBRenDMillerRJet al. Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns Generated in Osteoarthritis Directly Excite Murine Nociceptive Neurons Through Toll-Like Receptor 4. Arthritis Rheumatol (2015) 67:2933–43. doi: 10.1002/art.39291

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 139

  van LentPLBlomABSchelbergenRFSloetjesALafeberFPLemsWFet al. Active Involvement of Alarmins S100A8 and S100A9 in the Regulation of Synovial Activation and Joint Destruction During Mouse and Human Osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum (2012) 64:1466–76. doi: 10.1002/art.34315

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 140

  Ferreira-GomesJGarciaMMNascimentoDAlmeidaLQuesadaECastro-LopesJMet al. TLR4 Antagonism Reduces Movement-Induced Nociception and ATF-3 Expression in Experimental Osteoarthritis. J Pain Res (2021) 14:2615–27. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S317877

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 141

  LacagninaMJWatkinsLRGracePM. Toll-Like Receptors and Their Role in Persistent Pain. Pharmacol Ther (2018) 184:145–58. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2017.10.006

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 142

  MaruyamaK. Senso-Immunology: Crosstalk Between Nociceptive and Immune Systems. FEBS J (2021). doi: 10.1111/febs.15846

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 143

  MillerREIshiharaSTranPBGolubSBLastKMillerRJet al. An Aggrecan Fragment Drives Osteoarthritis Pain Through Toll-Like Receptor 2. JCI Insight (2018) 3(6):e95704. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.95704

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 144

  HoshikawaNSakaiATakaiSSuzukiH. Targeting Extracellular miR-21-TLR7 Signaling Provides Long-Lasting Analgesia in Osteoarthritis. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids (2020) 19:199–207. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2019.11.011

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 145

  KonttinenYTSillatTBarretoGAinolaMNordstromDC. Osteoarthritis as an Autoinflammatory Disease Caused by Chondrocyte-Mediated Inflammatory Responses. Arthritis Rheum (2012) 64:613–6. doi: 10.1002/art.33451

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 146

  BinshtokAMWangHZimmermannKAmayaFVardehDShiLet al. Nociceptors Are Interleukin-1beta Sensors. J Neurosci (2008) 28:14062–73. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3795-08.2008

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 147

  KongtharvonskulJAnothaisintaweeTMcEvoyMAttiaJWoratanaratPThakkinstianA. Efficacy and Safety of Glucosamine, Diacerein, and NSAIDs in Osteoarthritis Knee: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Eur J Med Res (2015) 20:24. doi: 10.1186/s40001-015-0115-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 148

  BrahmachariBChatterjeeSGhoshA. Efficacy and Safety of Diacerein in Early Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial. Clin Rheumatol (2009) 28:1193–8. doi: 10.1007/s10067-009-1225-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 149

  KrausVBBirminghamJStablerTVFengSTaylorDCMoormanCT3rdet al. Effects of Intraarticular IL1-Ra for Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Knee Injury: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial (NCT00332254). Osteoarthr Cartil (2012) 20:271–8. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2011.12.009

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 150

  HeXHZangYChenXPangRPXuJTZhouXet al. TNF-Alpha Contributes to Up-Regulation of Nav1.3 and Nav1.8 in DRG Neurons Following Motor Fiber Injury. Pain (2010) 151:266–79. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.06.005

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 151

  OritaSKoshiTMitsukaTMiyagiMInoueGAraiGet al. Associations Between Proinflammatory Cytokines in the Synovial Fluid and Radiographic Grading and Pain-Related Scores in 47 Consecutive Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Knee. BMC Musculoskelet Disord (2011) 12:144. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-144

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 152

  MaksymowychWPRussellASChiuPYanAJonesNClareTet al. Targeting Tumour Necrosis Factor Alleviates Signs and Symptoms of Inflammatory Osteoarthritis of the Knee. Arthritis Res Ther (2012) 14:R206. doi: 10.1186/ar4044

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 153

  OhtoriSOritaSYamauchiKEguchiYOchiaiNKishidaSet al. Efficacy of Direct Injection of Etanercept Into Knee Joints for Pain in Moderate and Severe Knee Osteoarthritis. Yonsei Med J (2015) 56:1379–83. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2015.56.5.1379

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 154

  BoettgerMKHensellekSRichterFGajdaMStockigtRvon BanchetGSet al. Antinociceptive Effects of Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Neutralization in a Rat Model of Antigen-Induced Arthritis: Evidence of a Neuronal Target. Arthritis Rheum (2008) 58:2368–78. doi: 10.1002/art.23608

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 155

  EitnerAHofmannGOSchaibleHG. Mechanisms of Osteoarthritic Pain. Studies in Humans and Experimental Models. Front Mol Neurosci (2017) 10:349:349. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2017.00349

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 156

  GaillardJPugniereMTrescaJManiJKleinBBrochierJ. Interleukin-6 Receptor Signaling. II. Bio-Availability of Interleukin-6 in Serum. Eur Cytokine Netw (1999) 10:337–44.

  • Google Scholar

• 157

  ObrejaOBiasioWAndratschMLipsKSRatheePKLudwigAet al. Fast Modulation of Heat-Activated Ionic Current by Proinflammatory Interleukin 6 in Rat Sensory Neurons. Brain (2005) 128:1634–41. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh490

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 158

  BoettgerMKLeuchtweisJKummelDGajdaMBrauerRSchaibleHG. Differential Effects of Locally and Systemically Administered Soluble Glycoprotein 130 on Pain and Inflammation in Experimental Arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther (2010) 12:R140. doi: 10.1186/ar3079

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 159

  SmolenJSBeaulieuARubbert-RothARamos-RemusCRovenskyJAlecockEet al. Effect of Interleukin-6 Receptor Inhibition With Tocilizumab in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis (OPTION Study): A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomised Trial. Lancet (2008) 371:987–97. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60453-5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 160

  KunwarSDahalKSharmaS. Anti-IL-17 Therapy in Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Rheumatol Int (2016) 36:1065–75. doi: 10.1007/s00296-016-3480-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 161

  LiuYPengHMengZWeiM. Correlation of IL-17 Level in Synovia and Severity of Knee Osteoarthritis. Med Sci Monit (2015) 21:1732–6. doi: 10.12659/msm.893771

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 162

  LiLJiangBE. Serum and Synovial Fluid Chemokine Ligand 2/Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein 1 Concentrations Correlates With Symptomatic Severity in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis. Ann Clin Biochem (2015) 52:276–82. doi: 10.1177/0004563214545117

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 163

  CuellarVGCuellarJMKirschTStraussEJ. Correlation of Synovial Fluid Biomarkers With Cartilage Pathology and Associated Outcomes in Knee Arthroscopy. Arthroscopy (2016) 32:475–85. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.08.033

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 164

  BelkouchMDansereauMAReaux-Le GoazigoAVan SteenwinckelJBeaudetNChraibiAet al. The Chemokine CCL2 Increases Nav1.8 Sodium Channel Activity in Primary Sensory Neurons Through a Gbetagamma-Dependent Mechanism. J Neurosci (2011) 31:18381–90. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3386-11.2011

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 165

  KaoDJLiAHChenJCLuoRSChenYLLuJCet al. CC Chemokine Ligand 2 Upregulates the Current Density and Expression of TRPV1 Channels and Nav1.8 Sodium Channels in Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons. J Neuroinflamm (2012) 9:189. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-9-189

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 166

  Miotla ZarebskaJChanalarisADriscollCBurleighAMillerREMalfaitAMet al. CCL2 and CCR2 Regulate Pain-Related Behaviour and Early Gene Expression in Post-Traumatic Murine Osteoarthritis But Contribute Little to Chondropathy. Osteoarthr Cartil (2017) 25:406–12. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2016.10.008

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 167

  MillerRETranPBDasRGhoreishi-HaackNRenDMillerRJet al. CCR2 Chemokine Receptor Signaling Mediates Pain in Experimental Osteoarthritis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2012) 109:20602–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1209294110

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 168

  PuntilloFGiglioMPaladiniAPerchiazziGViswanathOUritsIet al. Pathophysiology of Musculoskeletal Pain: A Narrative Review. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis (2021) 13:1759720X21995067. doi: 10.1177/1759720X21995067

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 169

  MantyhPWKoltzenburgMMendellLMTiveLSheltonDL. Antagonism of Nerve Growth Factor-TrkA Signaling and the Relief of Pain. Anesthesiology (2011) 115:189–204. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31821b1ac5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 170

  McNameeKEBurleighAGompelsLLFeldmannMAllenSJWilliamsROet al. Treatment of Murine Osteoarthritis With TrkAd5 Reveals a Pivotal Role for Nerve Growth Factor in Non-Inflammatory Joint Pain. Pain (2010) 149:386–92. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.03.002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 171

  IshikawaGKoyaYTanakaHNagakuraY. Long-Term Analgesic Effect of a Single Dose of Anti-NGF Antibody on Pain During Motion Without Notable Suppression of Joint Edema and Lesion in a Rat Model of Osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil (2015) 23:925–32. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.02.002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 172

  AshrafSMappPIBurstonJBennettAJChapmanVWalshDA. Augmented Pain Behavioural Responses to Intra-Articular Injection of Nerve Growth Factor in Two Animal Models of Osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis (2014) 73:1710–8. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203416

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 173

  LaneNESchnitzerTJBirbaraCAMokhtaraniMSheltonDLSmithMDet al. Tanezumab for the Treatment of Pain From Osteoarthritis of the Knee. N Engl J Med (2010) 363:1521–31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0901510

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 174

  NagashimaHSuzukiMArakiSYamabeTMutoCTanezumabI. Preliminary Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of Tanezumab in Japanese Patients With Moderate to Severe Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Dose-Escalation, Placebo-Controlled Study. Osteoarthr Cartil (2011) 19:1405–12. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2011.09.006

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 175

  SchnitzerTJMarksJA. A Systematic Review of the Efficacy and General Safety of Antibodies to NGF in the Treatment of OA of the Hip or Knee. Osteoarthr Cartil (2015) 23 Suppl 1:S8–17. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.10.003

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 176

  HochbergMC. Serious Joint-Related Adverse Events in Randomized Controlled Trials of Anti-Nerve Growth Factor Monoclonal Antibodies. Osteoarthr Cartil (2015) 23 Suppl 1:S18–21. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.10.005

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 177

  LacagninaMJHeijnenCJWatkinsLRGracePM. Autoimmune Regulation of Chronic Pain. Pain Rep (2021) 6:e905. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000905

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 178

  NielenMMvan SchaardenburgDReesinkHWvan de StadtRJvan der Horst-BruinsmaIEde KoningMHet al. Specific Autoantibodies Precede the Symptoms of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Study of Serial Measurements in Blood Donors. Arthritis Rheum (2004) 50:380–6. doi: 10.1002/art.20018

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 179

  TotschSKSorgeRE. Immune System Involvement in Specific Pain Conditions. Mol Pain (2017) 13:1744806917724559. doi: 10.1177/1744806917724559

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 180

  WigerbladGBasDBFernades-CerqueiraCKrishnamurthyANandakumarKSRogozKet al. Autoantibodies to Citrullinated Proteins Induce Joint Pain Independent of Inflammation via a Chemokine-Dependent Mechanism. Ann Rheum Dis (2016) 75:730–8. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208094

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 181

  KodamaRMurakiSIidakaTOkaHTeraguchiMKagotaniRet al. Serum Levels of Matrix Metalloproteinase-3 and Autoantibodies Related to Rheumatoid Arthritis in the General Japanese Population and Their Association With Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis: The ROAD Study. J Bone Miner Metab (2018) 36:246–53. doi: 10.1007/s00774-017-0834-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 182

  Van DykeTESerhanCN. Resolution of Inflammation: A New Paradigm for the Pathogenesis of Periodontal Diseases. J Dent Res (2003) 82:82–90. doi: 10.1177/154405910308200202

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 183

  HwangSMChungGKimYHParkCK. The Role of Maresins in Inflammatory Pain: Function of Macrophages in Wound Regeneration. Int J Mol Sci (2019) 20(23):5849. doi: 10.3390/ijms20235849

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 184

  TangSWanMHuangWStantonRCXuY. Maresins: Specialized Proresolving Lipid Mediators and Their Potential Role in Inflammatory-Related Diseases. Mediators Inflamm (2018) 2018:2380319. doi: 10.1155/2018/2380319

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 185

  DalliJSerhanC. Macrophage Proresolving Mediators-The When and Where. Microbiol Spectr (2016) 4(3):e4.3.21. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.MCHD-0001-2014

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 186

  WillemenHLEijkelkampNGarza CarbajalAWangHMackMZijlstraJet al. Monocytes/Macrophages Control Resolution of Transient Inflammatory Pain. J Pain (2014) 15:496–506. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.01.491

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 187

  DaghestaniHNPieperCFKrausVB. Soluble Macrophage Biomarkers Indicate Inflammatory Phenotypes in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol (2015) 67:956–65. doi: 10.1002/art.39006

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 188

  SakuraiYFujitaMKawasakiSSanakiTYoshiokaTHigashinoKet al. Contribution of Synovial Macrophages to Rat Advanced Osteoarthritis Pain Resistant to Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors. Pain (2019) 160:895–907. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001466

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 189

  CookADPobjoyJSteidlSDurrMBraineELTurnerALet al. Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Is a Key Mediator in Experimental Osteoarthritis Pain and Disease Development. Arthritis Res Ther (2012) 14:R199. doi: 10.1186/ar4037

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 190

  TewariDCookADLeeMCChristensenADCroxfordABecherBet al. Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor As an Indirect Mediator of Nociceptor Activation and Pain. J Neurosci (2020) 40:2189–99. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2268-19.2020

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 191

  LeeMCSalehRAchuthanAFleetwoodAJForsterIHamiltonJAet al. CCL17 Blockade as a Therapy for Osteoarthritis Pain and Disease. Arthritis Res Ther (2018) 20:62. doi: 10.1186/s13075-018-1560-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 192

  Segond von BanchetGBoettgerMKFischerNGajdaMBrauerRSchaibleHG. Experimental Arthritis Causes Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha-Dependent Infiltration of Macrophages Into Rat Dorsal Root Ganglia Which Correlates With Pain-Related Behavior. Pain (2009) 145:151–9. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.06.002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 193

  RaoofRMartin GilCLafeberFde VisserHPradoJVersteegSet al. Dorsal Root Ganglia Macrophages Maintain Osteoarthritis Pain. J Neurosci (2021) 41:8249–61. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1787-20.2021

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 194

  SunJRamnathRDZhiLTamizhselviRBhatiaM. Substance P Enhances NF-KappaB Transactivation and Chemokine Response in Murine Macrophages via ERK1/2 and P38 MAPK Signaling Pathways. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol (2008) 294:C1586–1596. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00129.2008

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 195

  Baliu-PiqueMJusekGHolzmannB. Neuroimmunological Communication via CGRP Promotes the Development of a Regulatory Phenotype in TLR4-Stimulated Macrophages. Eur J Immunol (2014) 44:3708–16. doi: 10.1002/eji.201444553

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 196

  LisowskaBLisowskiASiewrukK. Substance P and Chronic Pain in Patients With Chronic Inflammation of Connective Tissue. PloS One (2015) 10:e0139206. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139206

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 197

  WangHZhangXHeJYZhengXFLiDLiZet al. Increasing Expression of Substance P and Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide in Synovial Tissue and Fluid Contribute to the Progress of Arthritis in Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip. Arthritis Res Ther (2015) 17:4. doi: 10.1186/s13075-014-0513-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 198

  QianYZengBFZhangXLJiangY. High Levels of Substance P and CGRP in Pseudosynovial Fluid From Patients With Aseptic Loosening of Their Hip Prosthesis. Acta Orthop (2008) 79:342–5. doi: 10.1080/17453670710015238

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 199

  JohnsonMBYoungADMarriottI. The Therapeutic Potential of Targeting Substance P/NK-1r Interactions in Inflammatory CNS Disorders. Front Cell Neurosci (2016) 10:296:296. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2016.00296

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 200

  KataevaGAgroAStaniszAM. Substance-P-Mediated Intestinal Inflammation: Inhibitory Effects of CP 96,345 and SMS 201-995. Neuroimmunomodulation (1994) 1:350–6. doi: 10.1159/000097187

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 201

  StraubRHHarleP. Sympathetic Neurotransmitters in Joint Inflammation. Rheum Dis Clin North Am (2005) 31:43–59, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2004.09.003

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 202

  LortonDLubahnCKleinNSchallerJBellingerDL. Dual Role for Noradrenergic Innervation of Lymphoid Tissue and Arthritic Joints in Adjuvant-Induced Arthritis. Brain Behav Immun (1999) 13:315–34. doi: 10.1006/brbi.1999.0564

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 203

  LubahnCLSchallerJABellingerDLSweeneySLortonD. The Importance of Timing of Adrenergic Drug Delivery in Relation to the Induction and Onset of Adjuvant-Induced Arthritis. Brain Behav Immun (2004) 18:563–71. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2004.02.004

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 204

  KanashiroAde LeoncioTOLSchneiderAHAlvesHRBassiGSDutraSGVet al. Regulation of Murine Arthritis by Systemic, Spinal, and Intra-Articular Adrenoceptors. Pharmacol Rep (2019) 71:1095–103. doi: 10.1016/j.pharep.2019.06.010

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 205

  Ribeiro-da-SilvaMVasconcelosDMAlencastreISOliveiraMJLinharesDNevesNet al. Interplay Between Sympathetic Nervous System and Inflammation in Aseptic Loosening of Hip Joint Replacement. Sci Rep (2018) 8:16044. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33360-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 206

  KornerASchlegelMKaussenTGudernatschVHansmannGSchumacherTet al. Sympathetic Nervous System Controls Resolution of Inflammation via Regulation of Repulsive Guidance Molecule A. Nat Commun (2019) 10:633. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08328-5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar