A microfluidic device for simple and rapid evaluation of multidrug efflux pump inhibitors
- 1 Department of Applied Chemistry, Graduate School of Engineering, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
- 2 Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Chiyodaku, Tokyo, Japan
- 3 Laboratory of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Institute of Scientific and Industrial Research, Osaka University, Ibaraki, Osaka, Japan
- 4 Department of Cell Membrane Biology, Institute of Scientific and Industrial Research, Osaka University, Ibaraki, Osaka, Japan
- 5 Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan
Recently, multidrug-resistant pathogens have disseminated widely owing essentially to their increased multidrug efflux pump activity. Presently, there is a scarcity of new antibacterial agents, and hence, inhibitors of multidrug efflux pumps belonging to the resistance–nodulation–cell division (RND) family appear useful in the treatment of infections by multidrug-resistant pathogens. Moreover, recent progress in microfabrication technologies has expanded the application of nano/micro-devices to the field of human healthcare, such as the detection of infections and diagnosis of diseases. We developed a microfluidic channel device for a simple and rapid evaluation of bacterial drug efflux activity. By combining the microfluidic device with a fluorogenic compound, fluorescein-di-β-D-galactopyranoside, which is hydrolyzed to a fluorescent dye in the cytoplasm of Escherichia coli, we successfully evaluated the effects of inhibitors on the RND-type multidrug efflux pumps MexAB–OprM and MexXY–OprM from Pseudomonas aeruginosa in E. coli. Our new method successfully detected the MexB-specific inhibitory effect of D13-9001 and revealed an unexpected membrane-permeabilizing effect of Phe-Arg-β-naphthylamide, which has long been used as an efflux pump inhibitor.
Currently, increase in multidrug resistance among clinical isolates is a major problem in infection control. In particular, the so-called “multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDRP)” which is resistant to major antipseudomonal agents such as carbapenems, quinolones, and aminoglycosides (Sekiguchi et al., 2007b; Kirikae et al., 2008), has been isolated and identified as a cause of nosocomial outbreaks in Japan (Sekiguchi et al., 2007a; Satoh et al., 2008). P. aeruginosa has natural intrinsic resistance tendencies, and MDRP isolates have variable complex resistance mechanisms (Livermore, 2002; Lister et al., 2009). In particular, multidrug efflux pumps, particularly resistance–nodulation–cell division (RND) family pumps, can decrease the sensitivity of P. aeruginosa to various compounds (Masuda et al., 2000; Ryan et al., 2001). The RND-type multidrug efflux systems have extremely broad substrate specificities and protect the cells from the actions of antibiotics. They usually function as three-component assemblies spanning the outer and cytoplasmic membranes and the periplasmic space of Gram-negative bacteria. That is, the RND efflux system consists of three different proteins: a cytoplasmic membrane protein (such as MexB), a membrane fusion protein (MexA), and an outer membrane channel (OprM).
Twelve intrinsic efflux systems belonging to the RND family have been identified from the genomic sequence of P. aeruginosa (Schweizer, 2003). Among them, MexAB–OprM, MexCD–OprJ, MexEF–OprN, and MexXY efflux systems are known to have important roles in multidrug resistance (Morita et al., 2001; Llanes et al., 2004; Mesaros et al., 2007; Lister et al., 2009). These systems can increase their resistance levels by acquiring additional resistance factors (Henrichfreise et al., 2007; Giske et al., 2008). During the current era of scarcity of new antibacterial agents, RND pump inhibitors in combination with available antibiotics could be useful for treating MDRP infections. Although no clinically useful inhibitor is known presently, the enhancing effects of experimentally available efflux pump inhibitors, namely pyridopyrimidine (D13-9001; Yoshida et al., 2007) and Phe-Arg-β-naphthylamide (PAβN, MC-207,110; Lomovskaya et al., 2001), on the antibacterial activities of combined antibiotics have been published (Lomovskaya et al., 2001; Mesaros et al., 2007; Tohidpour et al., 2009). Recently, the 3D structures of AcrB (Murakami et al., 2002) and MexB (Sennhauser et al., 2009) and co-crystal structures of AcrB with various substrates were resolved (Murakami et al., 2006; Nakashima et al., 2011), and much information regarding their mechanisms of efflux is now available. At present, rational approaches are being used to develop potent efflux pump inhibitors. However, there is no satisfactory method to directly determine the efflux-inhibiting activities of candidate compounds.
In this review article, we focused on a new technique for a simple and rapid measurement of the activities of bacterial drug efflux pumps and inhibitors by using a microfluidic device recently reported by Matsumoto et al. (2011). We utilized an appropriate substrate, fluorescein-di-β-D-galactopyranoside (FDG), for a visual assay. FDG is non-fluorescent until it is hydrolysed by β-galactosidase in the cytoplasm of Escherichia coli to produce a highly fluorescent dye, fluorescein (Russo-Marie et al., 1993; Fieldler and Hinz, 1994; Yang and Hu, 2004). We confirmed that both FDG and fluorescein are substrates of RND pumps in E. coli. In combination with microfabrication technologies including soft lithography (Whitesides et al., 2001), we constructed a simple microfluidic channel device in order to observe several bacterial cultures simultaneously. By combining FDG and the microfluidic device, we developed a novel and highly sensitive method to evaluate the efflux inhibitory activities of compounds against P. aeruginosa MexB and MexY in E. coli and clarified the different action mechanisms of two inhibitors, D13-9001 and PAβN.
Materials and Methods
Escherichia coli MG1655 (wild-type), and its efflux pump gene deletion mutants – ΔacrB, ΔtolC, and ΔacrBΔtolC (Nishino et al., 2008) – were used. The vector plasmid pMMB67HE recombined with efflux pump genes mexAB–oprM and mexXY–oprM from P. aeruginosa (Mokhonov et al., 2004) was transformed with E. coli MG1655 ΔacrBΔtolC to construct ΔacrBΔtolC/pMMB67HE (ΔBC/pV), ΔacrBΔtolC/pMMB67HE::mexAB–oprM (ΔBC/pABM), and ΔacrBΔtolC/pMMB67HE::mexXY–oprM (ΔBC/pXYM). For these strains harboring a plasmid, ampicillin (Sigma-Aldrich, Tokyo, Japan) was added to the cultures to ensure retention of the plasmid. Lactose (Sigma-Aldrich) and isopropyl-β-D-galactopyranoside (IPTG; Sigma-Aldrich) were added to the medium for β-galactosidase and plasmid-mediated pump inductions, respectively. P. aeruginosa IMCJ2.S1 (Sekiguchi et al., 2005) served as the multidrug-resistant strain, and P. aeruginosa PAO1 served as the standard strain.
Antibacterial Agents and Chemicals
The antibacterial agents used were aztreonam (Sigma-Aldrich), ciprofloxacin (Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), and erythromycin (Nacalai Tesque, Inc., Kyoto, Japan). D13-9001 (Daiichi Sankyo Co., Tokyo, Japan) and PAβN (Sigma-Aldrich) were used as efflux pump inhibitors. Polymyxin B (MERCK KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) was used as an outer and inner membrane permeabilizer, and Polymyxin B nonapeptide (PMBN; Sigma-Aldrich) was used as an outer membrane permeabilizer.
Preparation of Microfluidic Channels
Microfluidic channels (100 μm width, 17 μm height, 25–33 mm length; Figure 1B) fabricated in polydimethylsiloxane (Silpot 184, Dow Corning Toray Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) on a cover glass (Matsunami Glass Ind., Ltd., Osaka, Japan) were prepared by a conventional method described in previous studies (Whitesides et al., 2001; Matsumoto et al., 2011).
Figure 1. The micro fluidic device and principle of the efflux pump inhibition assay used in this study. (A) Mechanism of the inhibition assay of efflux pumps using FDG as a substrate. (B) Images of the microfluidic device, and an example of the assay: bright-field (top) and fluorescence images (bottom) of the E. coli wild-type, ΔacrB (ΔB), ΔtolC (ΔC), and ΔacrBΔtolC (ΔBC) cells. (C) Fuorescence images of the ΔacrBΔtolC/pABM (ΔBC/pABM), ΔacrBΔtolC/pXYM (ΔBC/pXYM) cells treated with different concentrations of D13-9001. (D) Fluorescence images of the E. coli ΔtolC cells treated with different concentrations of D13-9001, PAβN, PMBN, and polymyxin B. Modified from Matsumoto et al. (2011).
Efflux Pump Inhibition Assay
FDG (Marker Gene Technologies, Inc., Eugene, USA), a fluorogenic compound, is hydrolyzed by β-galactosidase in the cytoplasm of E. coli to produce a fluorescent dye, fluorescein. Both FDG and fluorescein are substrates of an efflux pump, AcrB, in E. coli. AcrB effectively prevents FDG influx in wild-type cells, resulting in no fluorescence. The ΔacrB and ΔtolC strains easily imported and hydrolyzed FDG to fluorescein, which is exported by residual pumps in the ΔacrB strain. Consequently, fluorescent medium in ΔacrB and fluorescent ΔtolC and ΔacrBΔtolC cells were observed in the microfluidic channels (Figures 1A,B). The induced activities of β-galactosidase in strains used in this study were comparable after acrB and/or tolC deletion and the plasmid-mediated introduction of pumps from P. aeruginosa.
The effects of inhibitors on FDG and fluorescein efflux were observed in the microfluidic channel with a BZ-8000 fluorescence microscope (Keyence, Osaka, Japan). Overnight Luria–Bertani (LB) broth (Becton Dickinson and Company, Sparks, USA) cultures were inoculated in fresh LB broth and incubated on a shaker until the culture reached an OD600 of 0.6–0.8. Lactose (50 mM) was added to induce β-galactosidase activity in strains harboring no plasmid. LB medium containing 100 μg/ml ampicillin and 1 mM IPTG was used to grow strains harboring the plasmid in order to retain plasmid and induce plasmid-mediated pumps and chromosomal β-galactosidase. The cultures were premixed with an inhibitor, injected in the microfluidic channels (Figure 1B) with 100 μg/ml FDG, and observed under the microscope after incubation for 15 min at 37°C. Different samples containing multiple channels were observed simultaneously in a single image field (Figures 1B–D).
Determination of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration and Checkerboard MIC
The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the antibacterial agents and checkerboard MICs of these agents in combination with the inhibitors or the membrane permeabilizer were determined using the standard micro dilution method defined by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (Wayne, PA, USA). Strains harboring the plasmid were cultured in LB medium containing 100 μg/ml ampicillin and 1 mM IPTG. The fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) indices were calculated as follows: FIC = [MICA in combination/MICA alone + MICB in combination/MICB alone]. Synergy was defined as an FIC index of less than 0.5.
Evaluation of Inhibitors by the Classic Checkerboard Method
Checkerboard MIC determination is a simple method to evaluate the effects of inhibitors on antibacterial activity. Although the method can only evaluate the combinatorial effect of an inhibitor on antimicrobials (synergy, addition, indifference, or antagonism), it is possible to estimate the action mechanism of an inhibitor by using different types of antimicrobials and target gene-deleted or gene-introduced mutants. From the viewpoint of efflux, we used three different types of antimicrobial agents in this study. Aztreonam is a substrate of MexB, although ciprofloxacin and erythromycin are substrates of several pumps. Furthermore, from the viewpoint of influx, ciprofloxacin easily penetrates the outer membranes of Gram-negative bacteria, erythromycin hardly penetrates them (Vaara, 1993), while the penetrability of aztreonam appears to be intermediate of the two. Table 1 shows the MICs of agents against strains of E. coli and P. aeruginosa used in this study. The MIC of aztreonam against E. coli was not influenced by acrB and tolC deletion or plasmid-mediated mexXY–oprM introduction. However, plasmid-mediated mexAB–oprM introduction decreased the sensitivity of ΔacrBΔtolC to aztreonam by eightfold. By contrast, the MICs of ciprofloxacin and erythromycin against E. coli were decreased by acrB and/or tolC deletion and increased by plasmid-mediated pseudomonal efflux pump gene (mexAB–oprM or mexXY–oprM) introduction.
There are two famous efflux pump inhibitors: D13-9001 and PAβN. The former is specific for MexB, whereas the latter is non-specific. PAβN had weak antibacterial activity against these E. coli and P. aeruginosa strains, and its MIC was changed by the deletion or introduction of pump genes, which revealed that pump deletion mutants had higher sensitivity to PAβN than the wild-type strain. The results indicate that PAβN is a substrate of RND pumps. D13-9001 had no antibacterial activity against these strains at concentrations less than 64 μg/ml. Inhibitor’s concentration-dependent changes in the MICs of antimicrobial agents were compared (Figure 2). Data obtained from ΔtolC, ΔacrBΔtolC, and ΔBC/pV were similar for all antimicrobial agents used in this study, and thus, we presented the data forΔBC/pV as a representative full RND pump deletion mutant in Figure 2.
Figure 2. Effect of D13-9001, PAβN, and PMBN on ciprofloxacin, aztreonam, and erythromycin activity. E. coli MG1655 wild, ΔacrB, ΔacrBΔtolC/pMMB67HE (ΔBC/pV), ΔacrBΔtolC/pABM (ΔBC/pABM), ΔacrBΔtolC/pXYM (ΔBC/pXYM), P. aeruginosa PAO1, and MDRP IMCJ2.S1 were used. Changes in the MICs of ciprofloxacin [CIP: (A-C)], aztreonam [ATM: (D-F)], and erythromycin [ERY: (G-I)] induced by D13-9001 (A,D,G), PAβN (B,E,H), or PMBN (C,F,I) were determined by checkerboard method. Modified from Matsumoto et al. (2011).
In E. coli MG1655, D13-9001 acted synergistically with ciprofloxacin and erythromycin against the wild-type strain and had no effect with either agents against ΔacrB, ΔtolC, or ΔBC/pV (Figures 2A,D,G). In P. aeruginosa, D13-9001 acted synergistically with aztreonam and ciprofloxacin but not with erythromycin, which had a higher affinity for MexY than for MexB (Table 1), against both sensitive and multidrug-resistant strains, and the synergy between D13-9001 and aztreonam was remarkable in these strains. D13-9001 increased the susceptibilities of E. coliΔBC/pABM to all three agents and had no effect on the susceptibilities of ΔBC/pV and ΔBC/pXYM (Figures 2A,D,G).
In contrast, PAβN significantly increased erythromycin activity against all strains including ΔacrB and ΔBC/pV (Figure 2H), although the effect of PAβN on ciprofloxacin activity remained additive against all E. coli strains (Figure 2B). However, PAβN exhibited remarkable synergy against MDRP IMCJ2.S1 with all of the three agents (Figures 2B,E,H),and the FIC indices of PAβN were 0.016, 0.031, and 0.063 with ciprofloxacin, aztreonam, and erythromycin, respectively. The effect of PAβN was less strong on PAO1 than on MDRP with ciprofloxacin or aztreonam. Furthermore, PAβN acted synergistically with aztreonam in ΔBC/pV, although this combination was additive in ΔBC/pABM and the wild-type. Synergy between PAβN and these antimicrobial agents could not be explained by efflux pump inhibition by PAβN.
Other than efflux pump inhibitors, outer membrane permeabilizers have also been used for enhancing the activity of antimicrobial agents (Vaara, 1992; Vaara and Porro, 1996; Vaara et al., 2010; Vingsbo Lundberg et al., 2010). Among them, PMBN is known to permeabilize only the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria, whereas polymyxin B permeabilizes both the outer and inner membranes (Vaara and Vaara, 1983a,b; Viljanen and Vaara, 1984). PMBN had also weak antimicrobial activities against pump-deleted strains, and it appeared to be a substrate of pumps. The effect of PMBN on ciprofloxacin activity was additive against the E. coli strains and PAO1 and was synergistic against IMCJ2.S1. By contrast, PMBN increased erythromycin activity against all strains including pump deletion mutants ΔacrB, ΔtolC, and ΔBC/pV. These results obtained for PMBN were comparable to and stronger than the results for PAβN. PMBN also increased aztreonam activity against all strains.
Efflux Pump Inhibition Observed by the New Device
AcrAB–TolC and the analogous RND pumps effectively prevented FDG influx in E. coli wild-type cells, resulting in no fluorescence (Figures 1A,B). By contrast, ΔacrB and ΔtolC easily accumulated and hydrolyzed FDG to fluorescein, which accumulated in ΔtolC cells but not in ΔacrB cells. Consequently, we observed fluorescent medium in ΔacrB experiments and fluorescent cells in ΔtolC experiments. Images of these strains in the microfluidic channels are shown in Figure 1B. Fluorescence was highly accumulated only in tolC-deleted strains. We also evaluated the inhibitors in relation to the MexAB–OprM and MexXY–OprM pumps from P. aeruginosa in E. coli. Fluorescent medium was observed in ΔBC/pABM and ΔBC/pXYM (Figure 1C), whereas fluorescent cells were observed in ΔBC/pV like in ΔtolC (Figure 1D). Thus, these RND pumps from P. aeruginosa appeared to be functional in E. coli ΔacrBΔtolC.
The effect of D13-9001 was not significant in wild-type E. coli in the new method (Matsumoto et al., 2011). Fluorescence in the device was decreased to a minor level by D13-9001 in a concentration-dependent manner in ΔacrB and ΔtolC, and the possibility of FDG influx-blocking activity of D13-9001 was suggested. However, D13-9001 clearly increased the accumulation of fluorescein in ΔBC/pABM cells, and the number of fluorescent cells was increased by D13-9001 in a concentration-dependent manner in ΔBC/pABM, although it had almost no effect in ΔBC/pXYM (Figure 1C). Conversely, PAβN increased the fluorescence in the medium of all strains, particularly for ΔtolC (Matsumoto et al., 2011), and the accumulation of fluorescein in the cells of ΔtolC disappeared (Figure 1D). PAβN appeared to have membrane-permeabilizing activities.
Membrane-Permeabilizing Activity Estimated by the New Device
We further evaluated the effect of PAβN in comparison with those of polymyxin B and PMBN in ΔtolC by the device. The membrane-permeabilizing activities of PAβN, PMBN, and polymyxin Bwere visualized by this new method using the pump-deficient strain ΔtolC. The MexB inhibitor D13-9001 had almost no effect on fluorescein distribution in ΔtolC (Figure 1D). By contrast, fluorescein accumulation in ΔtolC cells was disappeared by 4 μg/ml PAβN or by 4 μg/ml PMBN. Polymyxin B increased the fluorescence in the medium at concentrations exceeding 1 μg/ml, but fluorescein accumulation was observed in the presence of 1 μg/ml polymyxin B also. The disappeared accumulation of fluorescein in ΔtolC cells and increased fluorescence in the medium of ΔtolC appears to correspond with the outer and inner membrane permeabilization of E. coli, respectively. The effect of PAβN was similar to that of PMBN at lower concentrations and was similar to that of polymyxin B at higher concentrations (Figure 1D). The effect of outer membrane permeabilizers is significant with antibacterial agents that are effectively excluded by the intact outer membrane. The synergistic action of PAβN in combination with erythromycin appeared to arise from the outer membrane-permeabilizing activity of PAβN. In E. coli, the outer membrane-permeabilizing activity of PAβN was confirmed by the increased hydrolysis of nitrocefin, and the inner membrane-permeabilizing activity of PAβN was confirmed by the increased accumulation of SYTOX Green (Matsumoto et al., 2011).
Features of the New Method to Determine Efflux Pump Inhibitory Activities and Membrane-Permeabilizing Activities
FDG was defined as a substrate of RND pumps because it was more easily hydrolyzed in pump deletion mutants than in wild-type cells. Fluorescein was also defined as a substrate of pumps based on its accumulation in ΔtolC cells. Furthermore, from the results of the complete blockage of FDG hydrolysis by the addition of a protonophore, carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP), in all of the strains including ΔtolC (data not shown), FDG was confirmed to be actively imported into the cytoplasm. If CCCP only blocks efflux pumps, increased fluorescence would be observed in wild-type cells. The lactose permease LacY is not an FDG permease because lacY deletion in ΔlacI mutants (constitutive β-galactosidase producer) had no effect on FDG hydrolysis in the mutants (data not shown), and we have yet to identify an FDG permease. In wild-type cells, FDG is hardly imported into the cytoplasm because FDG is exported by AcrB from the periplasm before it is trapped by permease. The rate of FDG influx will increase in relation to the concentration of FDG in the periplasm until it reaches its maximum rate. Moderate inhibition of the pumps causes FDG influx and an efflux of fluorescein from the cells by the remaining activity of the pumps, and full inhibition of the pumps results in fluorescein accumulation in cells, similar to what is observed in ΔtolC cells. A real pump inhibitor without any effect on the bacterial membrane will increase fluorescence in wild-type cells in a concentration-dependent manner and will increase the accumulation of fluorescence in the cells. The microfluidic channel allowed these discriminations to be monitored using fluorescence microscopy. In fact, we detected moderately increasing fluorescence and increased accumulation of fluorescence in ΔBC/pABM in relation to the increasing concentration of D13-9001 (Figure 1C) which is known as a specific inhibiter of the MexAB–OprM pump. D13-9001 had no effect on the MexXY–OprM pump producing E. coli. The combinatorial effects of D13-9001 with the antimicrobials assessed by the checkerboard method are easily understandable by the inhibitory effect of D13-9001 on the AcrB or MexB pump in all of the tested strains of E. coli and P. aeruginosa.
While evaluating the activity of PAβN, we found that our method is also valuable for evaluation of the outer and inner membrane-permeabilizing activities of compounds. Outer membrane permeabilization causes the leakage of fluorescein from ΔtolC cells, and inner membrane permeabilization efficiently increases FDG influx and fluorescein production, resulting in fluorescein release from cells with or without pumps. By the FDG assay, it is easy to detect outer membrane permeabilization by the disappearance of fluorescein accumulation in ΔtolC cells and inner membrane permeabilization based on increases in fluorescence, particularly in the medium of pump deletion mutants.
Comparison of Our New Method with Other Available Methods for Determining Efflux Pump-Inhibitory Activities
Several fluorometric methods for evaluating efflux pump inhibitors have been published using substrates of these pumps such as alanine β-naphthylamide (Lomovskaya et al., 2001), N-phenylnaphthylamine (Lomovskaya et al., 2001), ethidium bromide (Lomovskaya et al., 2001), and pyronin Y (Kaatz et al., 2003). However, the inhibitory activities of PAβN itself could not be determined by the methods utilizing alanine β-naphthylamide or N-phenylnaphthylamine due to the high background fluorescence (Lomovskaya et al., 2001). Furthermore, PAβN has been reported to have no inhibitory effect on the efflux of ethidium bromide (Lomovskaya et al., 2001; Schumacher et al., 2006; Viveiros et al., 2008), which is also a known substrate of ABC-type transporters (Martins et al., 2009). The fluorescence of these compounds was less strong than that of fluorescein, and thus, they are not considered suitable for visualization in the microfluidic channel.
The determination of efflux pump inhibition activity via the typical methods of measuring the influx or efflux of some substrates by their fluorescence with a plate reader makes it difficult to exclude the effect of outer membrane-permeabilizing activity. In addition, accurate estimation of FDG hydrolysis by monitoring fluorescence with a plate reader is impractical, because the total fluorescence of fluorescein determined by a plate reader is higher when it diffused in the medium than when it is accumulated into cells; fluorescence determined by a plate reader in this study was generally higher in ΔacrB than in ΔtolC (data not shown). Therefore, fluorescence determined by a plate reader does not accurately correlate with the amount of fluorescein produced, and it is difficult to estimate the inhibitory effect on pumps with FDG by using a plate reader. The microfluidic channel method enables the discrimination of pure efflux pump inhibition from membrane permeabilization. However, when more than two different pumps are present in a cell, it may be difficult to detect the effect of a specific inhibitor on either pump. To overcome this problem, we need a mutant lacking all RND pumps and producing TolC that accumulates fluorescein. Deletions of acrB, acrD, acrEF, mdtABC, and mdtEF were not sufficient to ensure the accumulation of fluorescein in a manner similar to that in ΔtolC (data not shown). The effect of D13-9001 on E. coli AcrAB–TolC can be detected by this method for a strain that produces only AcrAB–TolC. We would be able to apply this method for evaluation of the efflux pump inhibitors against RND pumps in P. aeruginosa when we construct a strain of P. aeruginosa producing both β-galactosidase and FDG permease. In addition, the microfluidic channels are useful for comparative observation of multiple samples at the same time and easy to tailor-make. We are expanding application of these micro-devices for other microbiological assays.
Suspicion of the Efflux Pump Inhibitory Activity of PAβN
Throughout this study, we could not definitively determine whether PAβN actually inhibits efflux pumps. Using our new method, we observed that PAβN increased FDG hydrolysis and fluorescein leakage in all strains (Matsumoto et al., 2011), particularly in pump deletion mutants (Figure 1D). Because PAβN was reported first, it has been universally recognized as an efflux pump inhibitor (Lomovskaya et al., 2001; Mesaros et al., 2007). The effect of PAβN on MDRP IMCJ2.S1 was remarkably synergistic with all the agents examined in the present study (Figure 2). However, PAβN increased the susceptibilities of pump deletion mutants of E. coli especially to erythromycin, although it had almost no effect on ciprofloxacin in E. coli expressing MexAB–OprM or MexXY–OprM (Figure 2); this suggests that PAβN could not inhibit the efflux of ciprofloxacin by MexB or MexY. These actions of PAβN do not correlate with efflux pumps and are similar to those of the outer membrane permeabilizer PMBN. The effect of PAβN on the outer membrane was already known when it was discovered (Lomovskaya et al., 2001). Previous authors used a nitrocefin hydrolysis assay with intact cells to evaluate the outer membrane-permeabilizing activity of PAβN in P. aeruginosa, and permeabilizing activity was visible at PAβN concentrations lower than 16 μg/ml on the outer membranes of pump-deficient or CCCP-applied strains. Nitrocefin is a substrate of efflux pumps (Nagano and Nikaido, 2009), and thus, the permeabilizing activity of agents should be evaluated in the pump-deficient condition. The permeabilizing activity of PAβN on the outer membrane of E. coli by nitrocefin hydrolysis assay was comparable to the activity obtained in the FDG assay (Matsumoto et al., 2011) and was higher than that reported previously for the outer membrane of P. aeruginosa (Lomovskaya et al., 2001). The outer membrane-permeabilizing activity of PAβN has also been published by other researchers using resazurin as a substrate (Vidal-Aroca et al., 2009). In the FDG assay, the effect of PAβN on the outer membrane of E. coli was visible at 4 μg/ml (Figure 1D). LB was used for the FDG assay and the results were easy to compare with the results of synergy in MICs with antimicrobial agents in which the effect of PAβN was also detected in concentrations higher than 4 μg/ml. Outer membrane-permeabilizing activity is known to increase the sensitivity of bacteria to antimicrobial agents such as erythromycin that are excluded by an intact outer membrane (Vaara, 2009; Vaara et al., 2010) as well as efflux pump inhibitors, and we could obtain similar results using PMBN. The effect of PAβN on antimicrobial agents (Figure 2) appears to be due to its activity on the E. coli cell membranes. We could not obtain any clear evidence of the inhibitory activity of PAβN on the efflux pump itself. The possibility that PAβN competes with a substrate for binding to the efflux pump cannot be excluded completely, although competitive inhibition of efflux pumps by another substrate was not proven in E. coli by Elkins and Mullis (2007). The precise mechanism of synergy between PAβN and antimicrobial agents needs to be elucidated in future. Based on our findings using this new method, we concluded that PAβN appears to be a substrate of the pumps and permeabilizes the membranes of E. coli in contrast to D13-9001, which specifically inhibits MexB.
Availability of Efflux Pump Inhibitors and Membrane Permeabilizers
The effect of D13-9001 is simple and specific to strains expressing AcrB or MexB pumps. D13-9001 exhibits maximum synergistic effect with aztreonam, a substrate preferred only by MexB. However, D13-9001 was not completely synergistic with ciprofloxacin, which is a substrate of MexB, MexY, and other pumps. Because various pump structures exist, it may be difficult to develop a super inhibitor that can inhibit all major pumps in P. aeruginosa. Matching an inhibitor with combined antimicrobial agents is essential. Susceptibility augmenting agents such as PAβN may be useful when used in combination with a substrate of multiple efflux pumps such as erythromycin and ciprofloxacin. Considerably, membrane permeabilizers can enhance activities of antimicrobial agents against efflux pump deficient strains, enabling expansion of the spectrum from targeting anti-Gram positives to anti-Gram negatives. These features can transform old antimicrobial agents to newer and improved ones, and these activities can be evaluated by our new method all together. Discovery of a clinically useful agent augmenting antipseudomonal activities is anticipated.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
This study was supported by the Grant for Promotion of Fundamental Studies in Health Sciences of the National Institute of Biomedical Innovation (Project ID 07-03), Grants from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, and the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan. We are grateful to Dr. Taiji Nakae for providing plasmids and to Dr. Kirikae for providing P. aeruginosa IMCJ2.S1.
Elkins, C. A., and Mullis, L. B. (2007). Substrate competition studies using whole-cell accumulation assays with the major tripartite multidrug efflux pumps of Escherichia coli. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51, 923–929.
Giske, C. G., Buaro, L., Sundsfjord, A., and Wretlind, B. (2008). Alterations of porin, pumps, and penicillin-binding proteins in carbapenem resistant clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microb. Drug Resist. 14, 23–30.
Henrichfreise, B., Wiegand, I., Pfister, W., and Wiedemann, B. (2007). Resistance mechanisms of multiresistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains from Germany and correlation with hypermutation. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51, 4062–4070.
Kaatz, G. W., Moudgal, V. V., Seo, S. M., and Kristiansen, J. E. (2003). Phenothiazines and thioxanthenes inhibit multidrug efflux pump activity in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47, 719–726.
Kirikae, T., Mizuguchi, Y., and Arakawa, Y. (2008). Investigation of isolation rates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa with and without multidrug resistance in medical facilities and clinical laboratories in Japan. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 61, 612–615.
Lister, P. D., Wolter, D. J., and Hanson, N. D. (2009). Antibacterial-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: clinical impact and complex regulation of chromosomally encoded resistance mechanisms. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 22, 582–610.
Llanes, C., Hocquet, D., Vogne, C., Benali-Baitich, D., Neuwirth, C., and Plesiat, P. (2004). Clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa overproducing MexAB-OprM and MexXY efflux pumps simultaneously. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48, 1797–1802.
Lomovskaya, O., Warren, M. S., Lee, A., Galazzo, J., Fronko, R., Lee, M., Blais, J., Cho, D., Chamberland, S., Renau, T., Leger, R., Hecker, S., Watkins, W., Hoshino, K., Ishida, H., and Lee, V. J. (2001). Identification and characterization of inhibitors of multidrug resistance efflux pumps in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: novel agents for combination therapy. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45, 105–116.
Martins, A., Spengler, G., Rodrigues, L., Viveiros, M., Ramos, J., Martins, M., Couto, I., Fanning, S., Pages, J. M., Bolla, J. M., Molnar, J., and Amaral, L. (2009). pH Modulation of efflux pump activity of multi-drug resistant Escherichia coli: protection during its passage and eventual colonization of the colon. PLoS ONE 4, e6656. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006656
Masuda, N., Sakagawa, E., Ohya, S., Gotoh, N., Tsujimoto, H., and Nishino, T. (2000). Substrate specificities of MexAB-OprM, MexCD-OprJ, and MexXY-oprM efflux pumps in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44, 3322–3327.
Matsumoto, Y., Hayama, K., Sakakihara, S., Nishino, K., Noji, H., Iino, R., and Yamaguchi, A. (2011). Evaluation of multidrug efflux pump inhibitors by a new method using microfluidic channels. PLoS ONE 6, e18547. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018547
Mesaros, N., Glupczynski, Y., Avrain, L., Caceres, N. E., Tulkens, P. M., and Van Bambeke, F. (2007). A combined phenotypic and genotypic method for the detection of Mex efflux pumps in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 59, 378–386.
Mokhonov, V. V., Mokhonova, E. I., Akama, H., and Nakae, T. (2004). Role of the membrane fusion protein in the assembly of resistance-nodulation-cell division multidrug efflux pump in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 322, 483–489.
Morita, Y., Kimura, N., Mima, T., Mizushima, T., and Tsuchiya, T. (2001). Roles of MexXY- and MexAB-multidrug efflux pumps in intrinsic multidrug resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 47, 27–32.
Nishino, K., Senda, Y., and Yamaguchi, A. (2008). The AraC-family regulator GadX enhances multidrug resistance in Escherichia coli by activating expression of mdtEF multidrug efflux genes. J. Infect. Chemother. 14, 23–29.
Satoh, R., Tsukada, H., Tanabe, Y., Tamura, Y., Yamamoto, T., Takano, M., Ozaki, K., Tamura, T., and Gejyo, F. (2008). An outbreak and isolation of drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa at Niigata University Hospital, Japan. J. Infect. Chemother. 14, 325–329.
Schumacher, A., Steinke, P., Bohnert, J. A., Akova, M., Jonas, D., and Kern, W. V. (2006). Effect of 1-(1-naphthylmethyl)-piperazine, a novel putative efflux pump inhibitor, on antimicrobial drug susceptibility in clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae other than Escherichia coli. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 57, 344–348.
Sekiguchi, J., Asagi, T., Miyoshi-Akiyama, T., Fujino, T., Kobayashi, I., Morita, K., Kikuchi, Y., Kuratsuji, T., and Kirikae, T. (2005). Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain that caused an outbreak in a neurosurgery ward and its aac(6′)-Iae gene cassette encoding a novel aminoglycoside acetyltransferase. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49, 3734–3742.
Sekiguchi, J., Asagi, T., Miyoshi-Akiyama, T., Kasai, A., Mizuguchi, Y., Araake, M., Fujino, T., Kikuchi, H., Sasaki, S., Watari, H., Kojima, T., Miki, H., Kanemitsu, K., Kunishima, H., Kikuchi, Y., Kaku, M., Yoshikura, H., Kuratsuji, T., and Kirikae, T. (2007a). Outbreaks of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in community hospitals in Japan. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45, 979–989.
Sekiguchi, J., Teruya, K., Horii, K., Kuroda, E., Konosaki, H., Mizuguchi, Y., Araake, M., Kawana, A., Yoshikura, H., Kuratsuji, T., Miyazaki, H., and Kirikae, T. (2007b). Molecular epidemiology of outbreaks and containment of drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a Tokyo hospital. J. Infect. Chemother. 13, 418–422.
Tohidpour, A., Peerayeh, S. N., Mehrabadi, J. F., and Yazdi, H. R. (2009). Determination of the efflux pump-mediated resistance prevalence in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, using an efflux pump inhibitor. Curr. Microbiol. 59, 352–355.
Vaara, M., Siikanen, O., Apajalahti, J., Fox, J., Frimodt-Moller, N., He, H., Poudyal, A., Li, J., Nation, R. L., and Vaara, T. (2010). A novel polymyxin derivative that lacks the fatty acid tail and carries only three positive charges has strong synergism with agents excluded by the intact outer membrane. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54, 3341–3346.
Vidal-Aroca, F., Meng, A., Minz, T., Page, M. G. P., and Dreier, J. (2009). Use of resazurin to detect mefloquine as an efflux-pump inhibitor in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli. J. Microbiol. Methods 79, 232–237.
Vingsbo Lundberg, C., Vaara, T., Frimodt-Moller, N., and Vaara, M. (2010). Novel polymyxin derivatives are effective in treating experimental Escherichia coli peritoneal infection in mice. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 65, 981–985.
Viveiros, M., Martins, A., Paixao, L., Rodrigues, L., Martins, M., Couto, I., Fahnrich, E., Kern, W. V., and Amaral, L. (2008). Demonstration of intrinsic efflux activity of Escherichia coli K-12 AG100 by an automated ethidium bromide method. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 31, 458–462.
Yang, N. C., and Hu, M. L. (2004). A fluorimetric method using fluorescein di-beta-D-galactopyranoside for quantifying the senescence-associated beta-galactosidase activity in human foreskin fibroblast Hs68 cells. Anal. Biochem. 325, 337–343.
Yoshida, K., Nakayama, K., Ohtsuka, M., Kuru, N., Yokomizo, Y., Sakamoto, A., Takemura, M., Hoshino, K., Kanda, H., Nitanai, H., Namba, K., Imamura, Y., Zhang, J. Z., Lee, V. J., and Watkins, W. J. (2007). MexAB-OprM specific efflux pump inhibitors in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Part 7: highly soluble and in vivo active quaternary ammonium analogue D13-9001, a potential preclinical candidate. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 15, 7087–7097.
Keywords: fluorescein-di-β-D-galactopyranoside, microfluidic channel, fluorescence microscopy, pyridopyrimidine, Phe-Arg-β-naphthylamide, polymyxin B nonapeptide, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Citation: Iino R, Nishino K, Noji H, Yamaguchi A and Matsumoto Y (2012) A microfluidic device for simple and rapid evaluation of multidrug efflux pump inhibitors. Front. Microbio. 3:40. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00040
Received: 31 October 2011; Accepted: 26 January 2012; Published online: 08 February 2012.
Edited by:Tzi Bun Ng, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, China
Reviewed by:Veljo Kisand, University of Tartu, Estonia;
M. Pilar Francino, Center for Public Health Research, Spain
Jer-Horng Wu, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan
Copyright: © 2012 Iino, Nishino, Noji, Yamaguchi and Matsumoto. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial License, which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited.
*Correspondence: Yoshimi Matsumoto, Institute of Scientific and Industrial Research, Osaka University, Department of Cell Membrane Biology, 8-1 Mihogaoka, Ibaraki, Osaka 567-0047, Japan. e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org