ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol., 16 May 2012

Sec. Aquatic Microbiology

Volume 3 - 2012 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2012.00159

Transcriptional Changes Underlying Elemental Stoichiometry Shifts in a Marine Heterotrophic Bacterium

  • LC

    Leong-Keat Chan 1† ‡

  • RJ

    Ryan J. Newton 1,2

  • SS

    Shalabh Sharma 1

  • CB

    Christa B. Smith 1

  • PR

    Pratibha Rayapati 1

  • AJ

    Alexander J. Limardo 1

  • CM

    Christof Meile 1

  • MA

    Mary Ann Moran 1*

  • 1. Department of Marine Sciences, University of Georgia Athens, GA, USA

  • 2. Great Lakes WATER Institute, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Milwaukee, WI, USA

Abstract

Marine bacteria drive the biogeochemical processing of oceanic dissolved organic carbon (DOC), a 750-Tg C reservoir that is a critical component of the global C cycle. Catabolism of DOC is thought to be regulated by the biomass composition of heterotrophic bacteria, as cells maintain a C:N:P ratio of ∼50:10:1 during DOC processing. Yet a complicating factor in stoichiometry-based analyses is that bacteria can change the C:N:P ratio of their biomass in response to resource composition. We investigated the physiological mechanisms of resource-driven shifts in biomass stoichiometry in continuous cultures of the marine heterotrophic bacterium Ruegeria pomeroyi (a member of the Roseobacter clade) under four element limitation regimes (C, N, P, and S). Microarray analysis indicated that the bacterium scavenged for alternate sources of the scarce element when cells were C-, N-, or P-limited; reworked the ratios of biomolecules when C- and P- limited; and exerted tighter control over import/export and cytoplasmic pools when N-limited. Under S limitation, a scenario not existing naturally for surface ocean microbes, stress responses dominated transcriptional changes. Resource-driven changes in C:N ratios of up to 2.5-fold and in C:P ratios of up to sixfold were measured in R. pomeroyi biomass. These changes were best explained if the C and P content of the cells was flexible in the face of shifting resources but N content was not, achieved through the net balance of different transcriptional strategies. The cellular-level metabolic trade-offs that govern biomass stoichiometry in R. pomeroyi may have implications for global carbon cycling if extendable to other heterotrophic bacteria. Strong homeostatic responses to N limitation by marine bacteria would intensify competition with autotrophs. Modification of cellular inventories in C- and P-limited heterotrophs would vary the elemental ratio of particulate organic matter sequestered in the deep ocean.

Introduction

Bacterioplankton control the flux of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) into the microbial food web and influence the release of carbon to atmospheric, offshore, and deep sea reservoirs. Many studies suggest that catabolism of DOC is regulated by the biomass stoichiometry of heterotrophic bacteria with respect to N and other nutrients (del Giorgio and Cole, 1998). Thus bacteria incorporate a higher percentage of metabolized DOC into biomass when C is the limiting element and a lower percentage when other elements (typically N or P) limit growth, resulting in decreased growth efficiency as the substrate C:N ratio increases (Goldman et al., 1987). While the molar stoichiometry of C:N:P in marine seston averages ∼106:16:1 (the Redfield ratio; Redfield, 1934), bacteria from a variety of freshwater and marine environments have higher N and P requirements relative to C and typically must attain a biomass stoichiometry closer to 50:10:1 during DOC processing (Fagerbakke et al., 1996; Cotner et al., 2010).

A confounding factor in stoichiometry-based analyses is that heterotrophic bacteria can change the C:N:P ratio of their biomass in response to the substrate composition (Martinussen and Thingstad, 1987; Tezuka, 1990; Fagerbakke et al., 1996; Gundersen et al., 2002). This plasticity occurs either by uncoupling catabolism and anabolism to overproduce metabolites rich in the excess element (which can be stored or excreted), or by reducing the requirement for the limiting element. Resource-driven shifts in C:N:P ratios of bacterial biomass can affect the efficiency of DOC transformation, modify C flux through the marine food web (Elser et al., 1995), buffer mismatches between bacterial requirements and ecosystem resource availability, and alter the composition of particulate organic matter sequestered in the deep ocean (Thingstad et al., 2008).

While it is clear that any modifications in elemental stoichiometry must occur within the basic macromolecular constraints of a functioning heterotrophic bacterial cell, there is yet only rudimentary knowledge of the physiological mechanisms that might allow C:N:P ratio variability in marine bacteria. Proposed avenues for changes in stoichiometry include alteration of the cellular inventory of P-rich rRNA (Elser et al., 1996), trade-offs in macromolecular composition to maximize growth (Franklin et al., 2011), substitution of S for P in bacterial membrane lipids (Van Mooy et al., 2009), depletion of P reserves stored in the form of polyphosphate (Kornberg, 1999), depletion of C reserves stored in the form of polyhydroxybutyrate (Dawes and Senior, 1973), and reduction of the cell quota of the limiting element (i.e., the required cell concentration; Harder and Dijkhuizen, 1983; Rivkin and Anderson, 1997).

Here we investigate the global transcriptional response underlying resource-driven shifts in biomass stoichiometry in the marine heterotrophic bacterium Ruegeria pomeroyi DSS-3, a member of the ubiquitous Roseobacter clade, under four different element limitation regimes (C, N, P, and S). Our experimental approach equalized growth rates across treatments using continuous cultures (Ferenci, 2008), thereby disentangling effects of the limiting element from any growth rate-driven differences in cell composition (Elser et al., 1995). R. pomeroyi exhibited significant flexibility in biomass content of some elements but not others, and gene transcription patterns deduced from whole-genome microarrays revealed element-specific metabolic strategies underlying the stoichiometric shifts.

Materials and Methods

Cell growth conditions

Ruegeria pomeroyi DSS-3 was grown in 320 ml custom-made chemostats with a culture volume of 200 ml. Steady-state biomass was limited either by carbon (glucose, 1 mmol l−1), nitrogen (NH4Cl, 0.26 mmol l−1), phosphorus (KH2PO4, 9.2 μmol l−1), or sulfur (Na2SO4, 25 μmol l−1). The appropriate concentrations of limiting nutrients needed to produce similar biomass were initially approximated from batch culture experiments that measured growth yields of R. pomeroyi under a range of concentrations. The range was then narrowed in test runs of the chemostats. Once the correct element concentration was determined, six independent chemostat cultures for each macroelement limitation run at two different times were used for elemental analysis and triplicate RNA sampling.

Chemostat culture medium (Table A1 in Appendix) modified from Henriksen (2008) was buffered with 10 mmol l−1 1,3-bis(tris(hydroxymethyl)methyl amino)propane (Bis–tris propane), a C- and N-containing compound; batch cultures of R. pomeroyi did not grow with 10 mmol l−1 Bis–tris propane when it was added as the sole N or C source. Vitamins and trace metals were added to the culture medium (Table A1 in Appendix). The feed medium was added to each chemostat at a rate of 8.4 ml h−1, equivalent to a dilution rate of 0.042 h−1, chosen to approach the rate of marine bacterial growth in situ (∼1–2 day−1; Ducklow and Hill, 1985) while maintaining sufficient cell yield for biological and chemical analysis. During the incubation, cell cultures were mixed by constant stirring, and temperature was maintained at 30°C using a circulating water bath. Air was bubbled into the culture at a flow rate of 2 ml min−1. Salinity was constant at 25 and pH ranged from 6.6 to 7.0 during all growth regimes. Cell cultures were considered to be at steady-state when the change in OD600 was ≤10% between two successive measurements. At steady-state, the feed medium dilution rate equals cell growth rate, which was equivalent to a 16.5-h doubling time for R. pomeroyi DSS-3. All cultures reached steady-state after three volume exchanges, and cells were harvested after five volume exchanges

Inoculum for the chemostat cultures was from a frozen glycerol stock of R. pomeroyi DSS-3, revived by streaking onto 1/2 strength YTSS agar (yeast extract, 4 g l−1; tryptone, 2.5 g l−1; sea salts, 20 g l−1; agar, 20 g l−1; González et al., 2003; pH adjusted to 6.8), and incubating at 30°C in the dark. After colonies appeared (∼3 days after streaking), a patch of cells was transferred into 1/2 YTSS liquid medium and grown at 30°C with shaking at 150 rpm. After an overnight incubation, cells were washed two times and resuspended in fresh medium lacking glucose, ammonium, phosphate, and sulfate (Table A1 in Appendix). Cells were inoculated into 200 ml chemostat medium to an OD600 of 0.05 (∼7 × 106 cells ml−1), and cultured initially with the outflow pump turned off. After ∼16 h, the flow carrying the feed medium was started and the medium supply was maintained at a constant rate during the chemostat run.

Cell counts and protein measurements

Chemostat cultures were routinely monitored for OD600, cell counts, and cell protein concentration. For cell counts, aliquots taken from the chemostats were fixed with glutaraldehyde (2% vol/vol, final concentration), incubated at room temperature for 10 min, and frozen at −20°C. One freeze–thaw cycle did not cause a change in the cell count (data not shown). Thawed cells were stained with SYBR Green II (Molecular Probes/Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), incubated in the dark for 10 min, and analyzed with a Beckman Colter Cyan Flow Cytometer. Bacterial cells were quantified using a combination of forward light scatter and fluorescence detection. To reduce the contribution of background fluorescence, cells were quantified within a gate encompassing ≥94% of total fluorescence. Light scatter values provided an index of cell size. The cell protein concentration was measured from cells flash-frozen in a dry ice–ethanol bath according to the method of Bradford (1976) using Bovine Serum Albumin as a standard.

Spent medium analysis

For each treatment regime, concentrations of glucose, and were measured in one sample (one or two technical duplicates) of cell-free spent medium pooled from three independent chemostat cultures. Cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 16,250 × g. The supernatant from three replicates was combined and passed through a 0.22-μm pore-size cellulose acetate filter to remove remaining cells and stored at −20°C until analysis. An estimate of ammonium in the supernatant was obtained by assaying the spent medium using the Ammonia Assay Kit (BioVision, Mountain View, CA, USA; detection limit of 20 μmol l−1) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and correcting for the interference from pyruvate based on a control prepared in parallel with the sample. Attempts to measure ammonium with the more sensitive phenol–hypochlorite method (Solorzano, 1969) failed due to inhibiting agents in the culture medium. Glucose concentration was measured with the Glucose Assay Kit (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA; detection limit of 50 μmol l−1), and control samples were prepared in parallel with the supplied glucose standard. The concentration of was determined with a Shimadzu UV-1601 spectrophotometer using the molybdenum blue reaction (Strickland and Parsons, 1972) and the concentration of was determined with a DIONEX ICS-2000 ion chromatography system. Internal standards were used in and measurements.

Growth efficiency calculations

Carbon assimilatory efficiency was calculated as Cb/Cipt, where Cb is the C present in cell biomass per chemostat volume (200 ml), calculated as 3,072, 1,007, 2,928, and 511 μg C for the C-, N-, P-, and S-limited conditions, respectively, based on measures of biomass %C and dry weight; and Cipt is the C input to the chemostat per cell doubling minus any C remaining in the spent medium, calculated as 9,988 μg C for C-limited conditions (8.4 ml h−1 of a 1-mmol l−1 solution) and 44,946 μg C minus spent medium C for N-, P-, and S-limited conditions (8.4 ml h−1 of a 4.5-mmol l−1 solution).

Cell elemental analysis

Ruegeria pomeroyi DSS-3 cells from 240 ml of culture, pooled from three independent chemostat replicates (80 ml per replicate), were pelleted by centrifugation at 16,250 × g, washed twice in fresh medium without glucose, ammonium, phosphate, and sulfate (Table A1 in Appendix), immediately frozen in a dry ice–ethanol bath, and stored at −70°C. Frozen cell samples were lyophilized for dry weight measurements and then used in elemental analysis with a Perkin-Elmer 2400 CHN analyzer (C and N) and an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (P).

Free amino acid analysis

Cells from 180 ml of culture pooled from three independent chemostat replicates (60 ml per replicate) were washed and pelleted as described above. A portion was saved for cell counts by flow cytometry. To the remainder, 9.7 nmol of β-amino isobutyric acid was added as an internal standard (Hendrickson et al., 2008) and cells were rapidly frozen in a dry ice–ethanol bath and stored at −80°C until analysis. Frozen cell pellets were sent to the Molecular Structure Facility at the University of California Davis for assay with a Hitachi L-8900 Amino Acid Analyzer according to the facility’s protocol. Briefly, cell pellets were lysed with acetonitrile (50% vol/vol) and formic acid (5% vol/vol), and amino-ethyl cysteine was added as an internal standard for quality control. The final amount of amino acids was corrected for the standard and converted to units of pmoles (mg dry weight)−1.

Microarray hybridization

Cell culture from each replicate chemostat (45 ml) was rapidly fixed with 5 ml of phenol–ethanol solution (5% vol/vol). Cells were collected by centrifugation at 4,500 × g, the supernatant was removed, and the loose cell pellets were frozen at −70°C. Total RNA was purified using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) according to procedures described previously (Poretsky et al., 2009). DNA was removed by the TURBO DNA-free kit (Applied Biosystems/Ambion, Austin, TX, USA), ribosomal RNA was removed with the MicrobeExpress kit (Applied Biosystems/Ambion), and mRNA-enriched RNA was amplified with the MessageAmp II-Bacteria Kit (Applied Biosystems/Ambion).

A non-competitive, single-color hybridization strategy was used to hybridize the mRNA samples to microarray slides. Amplified mRNA was labeled with AlexaFluor 647 dye (Invitrogen), with modifications to the manufacturer’s protocol as described previously (Bürgmann et al., 2007). Amplified and labeled mRNA was purified with the MEGAclear kit (Applied Biosystems/Ambion) and concentrated by ethanol precipitation. Samples were hybridized to a whole-genome microarray manufactured by Combimatrix (Mukilteo, WA, USA) and imaged according to the procedures described in the manufacturer’s protocol. The CustomArray 12 K microarray slides for R. pomeroyi DSS-3 used in this study were described in detail by Bürgmann et al. (2007). A total of 8,143 probes, each present up to three times, were represented on the array (Bürgmann et al., 2007). Hybridized slides were stripped according to Combimatrix’s protocol and re-used up to three times. Arrays were re-imaged after each stripping, and re-stripped as needed until minimal fluorescence signal remained.

Microarray data analysis

Quality control of microarray hybridizations was performed as described previously (Bürgmann et al., 2007). Each hybridized spot was manually examined in GenePix Pro 6.0 Software (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA), and the background fluorescence was subtracted (i.e., fluorescence values of the five closest empty spots). Spots were flagged as bad with Acuity 4.0 (Molecular Devices) when they were unevenly hybridized (determined manually by checking the hybridization circularity), when the detected fluorescence minus the background fluorescence was less than 2 SDs of the background fluorescence [F635–B635 < 2 SD (B635)], or when the signal to noise ratio was <3. Probes were removed when the flagged spots were present in >25% of arrays. For the remaining probes with good hybridization signal, those targeting 5S rRNA, 16S rRNA, 23S rRNA, mismatch probes, and manufacturer’s control probes were removed. Each gene was represented by up to two probes and each probe was spotted up to three times on the array (Bürgmann et al., 2007). After probe removal, 5,145 probes (covering 3,324 genes out of the total 4,252 genes in the R. pomeroyi DSS-3 genome) remained for analysis. The complete microarray dataset, reported according to the Minimum Information About a Microarray Experiment guidelines (Brazma et al., 2001), was appended to the Gene Expression Omnibus1 (GEO; The National Center for Biotechnology Information), platform GPL4067, under series accession number GSE27032.

Florescence values from 14 microarray hybridizations (three biological replicates from each macroelement-limited condition and one technical replicate each for the N and S limitations) were normalized globally, as in Rinta-Kanto et al. (2010). Data for the technical replicates were averaged and combined (Figure A1 in Appendix). Spearman rank correlation coefficients between replicate arrays ranged between 0.82 and 0.96, while those between arrays from different treatments were ≤0.80 (Table A2 in Appendix). The exception was between P and S limitation arrays, for which the correlation coefficients ranged between 0.71 and 0.85 (Table A2 in Appendix). Statistical analysis was performed in MultiExperiment Viewer2 (MeV, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Saeed et al., 2006). Significance analysis of microarray (SAM; Tusher et al., 2001), available through the MeV interface, was used for statistical analysis. Pairwise comparisons were made between treatments, with the following settings: two-class unpaired, 5,000 permutations, and false discovery rate (FDR; Tusher et al., 2001) ≤2%. Pairwise SAM analyses were performed as follows: C limitation compared to C excess conditions (where N, P, or S was limiting); N limitation compared to N excess conditions (where C, P, or S was limiting); P limitation compared to P excess conditions (where N, C, or S was limiting); and S limitation compared to S excess conditions (where N, C, or P were limiting; Figure A1 in Appendix).

Transcriptionally responsive genes were identified as those with a ≥3-fold enrichment in all three pairwise comparisons across treatments (Figure A1 in Appendix). Four genes (SPO0968, SPO1031, SPO1795, and SPO3300) were transcriptionally enriched under one treatment but transcriptionally depleted under another, due to different responses of two probes for a single gene; these were not considered further. Designation of enriched or depleted genes was conservative. In many cases genes had significant responses in two out of three pairwise comparisons or had a ≥2-fold (but ≤3-fold) transcriptional change, but they were not considered further.

Gene annotation and metabolic pathway construction

Ruegeria pomeroyi DSS-3 gene products were generally assigned according to the annotations in GenBank (Accession number NC_003911.11) with updated gene calls as appropriate (SPO0781, phnD; SPO1948, pstS; SPO1979, OlsA-like protein; SPO1980, OlsB-like protein; SPO0372 and SPO2287, LuxI-type proteins). Operons were as predicted in Roseobase3, and metabolic pathways were constructed manually from BioCyc4 (SRI International, Menlo Park, CA, USA). For analysis of the global ocean sampling (GOS) metagenome (Rusch et al., 2007; Yooseph et al., 2007; data obtained from Community Cyberinfrastructure for Advanced Microbial Ecology Research and Analysis5), BLASTp was used to identify homologous sequences using an E-value of <10−5. The percent of bacterioplankton cells in GOS samples (as of May 2011; Sargasso Sea, northwest Atlantic, Pacific, and Indian Ocean sequences; Rusch et al., 2007; Yooseph et al., 2007) harboring a homolog was calculated as (number of homologs × 100)/number of recA, assuming only one homolog and one recA per genome and 10,196 recA homologs in the analyzed portion of the GOS dataset (Moran et al., 2011). For analysis of other microbial genomes, BLASTp was used to identify homologs using an E-value < 10−30. In both cases, candidate homologs were subjected to phylogenetic analysis using pplacer (Matsen et al., 2010) to confirm homology with genes of known function.

Cell stoichiometry

The stoichiometry rules that best reproduced observed C:N:P ratios under elemental limitation were explored. A simple model that assumed limitation shifted the concentration of the limiting element away from the concentration found under balanced growth (when all elements are available in non-limiting conditions) by a factor α, while the other two (non-limiting) elements were unaffected by the limitation gave the best fit to the observed C:N:P ratios. Thus the C:N:P ratio for R. pomeroyi under balanced growth conditions was approximated as:

where αX is the factor by which element x changes when it is limiting, and Cx, Nx, and Px are the C, N, and P content, respectively, under limiting element x.

Results and Discussion

Attributes of steady-state cultures

Measurements of cell-free spent media indicated that limiting elements were below the detection limit while non-limiting elements were in excess for chemostat-grown R. pomeroyi DSS-3 (Table 1). Cell dry weights for the C, N, and S treatments averaged 486 fg cell−1, similar to those reported for heterotrophic marine bacteria during exponential growth (322–512 fg cell−1, Vrede et al., 2002; Table A3 in Appendix), but P-limited cells had an unusually high dry weight (1,388 fg cell−1). C-limited cells were smaller and had higher growth efficiency (i.e., amount of new bacterial biomass produced per unit of organic C assimilated) than N-, P-, or S- limited cells (31 versus 1–8%; Table 1). By way of comparison, del Giorgio and Cole (1998) report 9–47% bacterial growth efficiencies (interquartile range) for heterotrophic bacteria in oceans and estuaries. The protein: dry weight ratio of S-limited cells was atypically high, likely reflecting an unnatural condition for marine bacterioplankton. Molar C:N ratios in biomass varied up to 2.5-fold and C:P ratios varied up to sixfold among the different limiting element regimes (Table 1).

Table 1

LimitationSpent medium (mmol l−1)
Steady-state culture
GlucoseaabbProtein (fg cell−1)cDry weight (fg cell−1)bProtein: dry weight (%)Flow scatter (mode)cC growth efficiencyMolar ratiob
C:NC:PN:P
CBDd1.020.401.76140.8454.031.01,79230.84.455.612.7
N0.72BD0.461.52353.9757.946.72,0482.711.2166.714.8
P0.670.54BD1.81371.51388.426.82,0487.79.5333.335.0
S0.66NDe0.430.01234.6245.895.42,099 ± 2801.34.962.512.7

Biological and chemical status of R. pomeroyi DSS-3 chemostat cultures.

aAverage of two technical replicates from pooled triplicate chemostat cultures.

bValue for one sample from pooled triplicate chemostat cultures.

cAverage of triplicate chemostat cultures; ±SD is specified if >10% of the mean.

dBelow detection of the assay (see Materials and Methods).

eNot determined.

Transcripts for 190 genes (4.5% of the 4,252 genes in the R. pomeroyi DSS-3 genome) were responsive exclusively to C, N, P, or S limitation, with 134 genes enriched (3.2%) and 56 genes depleted (1.3%; Figure A1 in Appendix; see Tables A4 and A5 in Appendix for a complete list of significantly enriched and depleted genes).

Transcriptional response to C limitation

The C-limited transcriptome was enriched in transporters for dicarboxylic acids, peptides, branched-chain amino acids, sugars, and glycine betaine/proline (Table 2), indicating increased investment in substrate acquisition. Several cell division transcripts were also present in higher proportion, including those for a chromosome initiation replication protein (dnaA), DNA helicase (recQ), DNA polymerase, and a purine biosynthesis enzyme (hisF; Table 2), coinciding with the smaller and more numerous cells observed under C limitation (Table 1). Transcripts for the rod shape-determining mreD, a mutated version of which causes Escherichia coli cells to take on a spherical shape (Wachi et al., 1989), were depleted (Table 2). Spherical shape and small cell size are characteristic of marine bacterioplankton in oligotrophic conditions, and are hypothesized to afford a more favorable surface-to-volume ratio to compete for scarce substrates (Azam et al., 1983). Relative increases in transcripts for three proteins involved in flagellum synthesis indicated increased motility of C-limited cells. Together, these changes represent a strong C scavenging response by C-limited R. pomeroyi cells.

Table 2

Locus tagProduct (gene name, if available)Fold-change ratioa
Response strategy
Probe 1Probe 2ScavengingQuota ChangeGate-keeping
C-LIMITED
SPO0107ATP-dependent DNA helicase (recQ)1.06.3
SPO0149Chromosomal replication initiation protein (dnaA)16.51.2
SPO0171Flagellar biosynthetic protein1.36.7
SPO0183H+-transporting two-sector ATPase, flagellum-specific6.31.0
SPO0590LacI family transcriptional regulator (carbon catabolite repression domain-containing)14.5
SPO0970Aquaporin Z (apqZ)3.11.3
SPO1132Glycine betaine/proline ABC transporter, ATP-binding protein3.13.0
SPO1156Imidazole glycerol phosphate synthase subunit (hisF)3.03.5
SPO1463TRAP dicarboxylate transporter, DctM subunit8.3
SPO1645Oligopeptide/dipeptide ABC transporter, permease protein4.6
SPO1807DNA polymerase III epsilon subunit family exonuclease3.71.0
SPO2370Sodium:alanine symporter family protein3.4
SPO3291Branched-chain amino acid ABC transporter, periplasmic binding protein, putative5.54.0
SPO3461Flagellar protein FlgJ, putative8.5
SPO3783Sugar ABC transporter, ATP-binding protein8.0
SPOA0097Branched-chain amino acid ABC transporter, permease protein3.61.4
SPOA0160TRAP dicarboxylate transporter, DctM subunit8.7
SPOA0299Branched-chain amino acid ABC transporter, permease protein0.93.7
SPO0416Rod-shaped determining protein (mreD)0.3
SPO1293Phasin (phaP)0.10.1
SPO1756Polysaccharide biosynthesis/export protein0.30.7
N-LIMITED
SPO0860Xylose repressor, putative3.23.2
SPO1707Urea transporter, ATP-binding protein (urtE)3.83.0
SPOA0447Urea transporter, ATP-binding protein (urtD)5.5
SPO1708Urea transporter, permease protein (urtC)11.6
SPO2087Nitrogen regulation protein (ntrC)1.14.3
SPO2294Nitrogen regulatory protein PII (glnB-1)9.06.6
SPO2295Glutamine synthetase, type I (glnA)4.75.1
SPO2364Amino acid ABC transporter, periplasmic binding protein1.34.1
SPO3723Ammonium transporter (amt-2)28.0
SPO3724Nitrogen regulatory protein PII (glnB-2)124.339.1
SPOA0300Branched-chain amino acid ABC transporter, periplasmic binding protein6.6
SPO0862Xylose ABC transporter, permease protein (xylH)0.30.3
SPO1079Lysine exporter, putative0.12.0
SPO1743Glutamate dehydrogenase0.20.2
SPO3156l-threonine aldolase, low-specificity, putative1.30.3
SPO3712Aspartate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase (asd)0.20.3
SPO3720Aromatic amino acid aminotransferase (tyrB)0.30.9
SPOA0011S-adenosylmethionine synthetase (metK)0.20.4
SPOA0057Glycine cleavage system T protein (gcvT)0.20.3
SPOA0215Nitric oxide reductase Q protein (norQ)2.20.1
SPOA0220Cytochrome cd1 nitrite reductase (nirS)0.2
P-LIMITED
SPO0147Enoyl-CoA hydratase4.33.0
SPO0304Lipoprotein, putative7.05.4
SPO0468Alkylphosphonate utilization protein (phnG)5.2
SPO0472Phosphonate C-P lyase system protein (phnK)10.9
SPO0781Phosphonate ABC transporter, periplasmic phosphonate-binding (phnD)103.5
SPO1860Alkaline phosphatase (phoX)7.4
SPO1948Phosphate ABC transporter, periplasmic binding protein (pstS)47.9
SPO1949Phosphate ABC transporter, permease protein (pstC)4.7
SPO1951Phosphate transporter ATP-binding protein (pstB)7.4
SPO1953Phosphate regulon transcriptional regulatory protein (phoB)10.726.1
SPOA0294Phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase (pmtA)3.61.2
S-LIMITED
SPO1256Polyphosphate kinase 2 (ppk2)5.04.0
SPO1409RNA polymerase factor sigma-32 (rpoH-2)12.5
SPO25965-amino-levulinate synthase (hemA-1)1.84.6
SPO2632Uroporphyrinogen-III C-methyltransferase (cobA-1)3.45.9
SPO2634Sulfite reductase, putative5.75.3
SPO3383Thiol-specific antioxidant protein4.94.5
SPO3527Universal stress protein family protein3.75.3
SPO3532Coproporphyrinogen III oxidase (hemN)7.3
SPO0371Autoinducer-binding transcriptional regulator (luxR-1)0.00.2
SPO1679DNA-binding response regulator (ctrA)0.20.2

Selected R. pomeroyi DSS-3 genes responding uniquely to a C-, N-, P-, or S-limited regime.

The enriched genes included here (unshaded rows) represent 36% of all enriched genes (Table A4 in Appendix); the depleted genes (gray-shaded rows) represent 27% of all depleted genes (Table A5 in Appendix).

aCalculated as the median value for limitation-to-excess pairwise comparisons.

Black dots indicate response strategy assignment.

In the C-limited cultures, the R. pomeroyi transcriptome was depleted in transcripts encoding the synthesis and export of high C-content surface-associated polysaccharides, a strategy that would lower the cellular C quota (Table 2). Transcripts for phasin (phaP), a protein that binds to the surface of C storage inclusions composed of polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA; Anderson and Dawes, 1990), were depleted (Table 2), indicating degradation of internal C reservoirs. Other genes involved in PHA metabolism (phbA, phbB, phaZ, phaR) did not have altered transcription levels (Figure A2 in Appendix), but this is consistent with data from the related alphaproteobacterium Rhodobacter capsulatus showing PHA synthesis genes to be constitutively expressed, with control occurring post-translationally (Kranz et al., 1997). Since PHA storage molecules have been observed in R. pomeroyi cells (González et al., 2003) and can occupy 40–50% of cell volume in some C-replete bacteria (Yurkov, 2006), this finding coincides with the smaller cell size observed under C limitation (Table 1). Together, this set of transcriptional changes comprise strategies for a reduced cell quota for C.

Transcriptional response to N limitation

N limitation induced a strong scavenging response for acquiring available N compounds mediated through a conserved bacterial regulatory system involving PII regulators (glnB-1 and glnB-2) and the N response regulator NtrC (Ikeda et al., 1996; Gyaneshwar et al., 2005; Walter et al., 2007; Table 2). Two genes previously found to be controlled by these regulators in E. coli (Zimmer et al., 2000; Gyaneshwar et al., 2005) were also part of the R. pomeroyi scavenging response: an ammonium transporter (amt-2, located adjacent to glnB-2) and a glutamine synthetase (glnA, mediating ammonium incorporation; located adjacent to glnB-1). Two other N scavenging activities included enrichment of transcripts for urea transport and amino acid transport (Table 2).

There was no evidence of a role for N storage compounds in the R. pomeroyi response to N limitation. The genome does not contain homologs to the genes required for synthesis of cyanophycin granule polypeptide (CGP), the only known bacterial mechanism for N storage (Füser and Steinbüchel, 2007). Instead, transcriptional responses focused on tightening of the import/export balance of N through better “gate-keeping.” In one response, depletion of a xylose ABC transporter (xylH) and enrichment of a putative xylose uptake repressor (Table 2) would work to decrease the import of high C:N content carbohydrates. In another, depletion of transcripts for a putative lysine exporter (Table 2) involved in cytoplasmic amino acid regulation (Vrljic et al., 1999) would suppress the export of low C:N content amino acids. Two genes mediating dissimilatory nitrite reduction (norQ and nirS, which are part of a partial denitrification pathway; Moran et al., 2004) were also depleted (Table 2), suggesting another mechanism for N retention through a decrease in N-based respiration. The underrepresentation of transcripts for amino acid metabolism, including glutamate dehydrogenase, threonine aldolase, asd (aspartate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase), metK (S-adenosylmethionine synthetase), tyrB (aromatic amino acid aminotransferase), and gcvT (glycine cleavage system T protein; Table 2) was consistent with the substantial change in free amino acid concentrations observed under N-limited conditions (0.5% of cell N content compared to 1.3 and 4.2% under C and P limitation; Table A6 in Appendix), suggesting a reallocation of cytoplasmic N. Collectively, the transcriptional data support strong N homeostasis as the major response to N limitation, enabled through intense scavenging and tighter controls over N import/export and cytoplasmic pools.

Transcriptional response to P limitation

A phoB-mediated response involving scavenging for inorganic and organic sources of P dominated the P-limited transcriptome (Table 2). Transcripts were enriched for transport or utilization of phosphate (pstB, -C, -S; Yuan et al., 2006), phosphonate (phnD, -G, and -K; Metcalf and Wanner, 1991; Parker et al., 1999), and phosphate esters (phoX; Sebastian and Ammerman, 2011; Table 2). While inorganic P storage is common among bacteria, R. pomeroyi does not have a close homolog to the widespread P storage enzyme polyphosphate kinase I (ppk1; Newton et al., 2010) or to 1,3-diphosphoglycerate-polyphosphate phosphotransferase or polyphosphate:AMP-phosphotransferase (Kulaev et al., 1971; Ishige and Noguchi, 2000). It has been suggested that SPO0224 functions as a ppk1 in R. pomeroyi (Nahálka and Pätoprstý, 2009), but neither that gene nor the two ppk2 genes purported to degrade polyphosphates (SPOP1256 and SPO1727; Nahálka and Pätoprstý, 2009) were transcriptionally modified under P limitation. Instead, there was evidence for lowering the P cell quota by reworking of membrane phospholipids, including enrichment of transcripts for an enoyl-CoA hydratase mediating fatty acid degradation, a phosphatidyl ethanolamine N-methyltransferase (pmtA), and a lipoprotein likely representing a membrane-bound degradative enzyme or stress sensor (Table 2; Figure A3 in Appendix). R. pomeroyi possesses genes for the synthesis of ornithine-containing lipids (olsAB-like genes), which incorporate N rather than P into lipid membranes. The transcription of olsB was highest under P limitation (Figure A3 in Appendix), although the probes did not meet the significance cut off of ≥3-fold. These genes are important under P limitation in closely related Alphaproteobacteria (Weissenmayer et al., 2002; Gao et al., 2004) and in marine bacterioplankton communities (Van Mooy et al., 2009), and we leave open the possibility that this pathway is involved in P content reworking in R. pomeroyi.

Transcriptional response to S limitation

Unlike responses to C, N, and P limitation, none of the 21 transcriptionally responsive genes to S limitation were indicative of scavenging (Tables A4 and A5 in Appendix). Instead, response took the form of increased relative expression of enzymes requiring S-containing substrates or cofactors (Figure A4 in Appendix). Changes in transcript abundance for the synthesis of 5-amino-levulinate (hemA-1), protoporphyrinogen IX (hemN), sirohydrochlorin (cobA-1), and the quorum sensor regulator luxR-1 (Table 2; Figure A4 in Appendix) may all be linked to a depleted pool of S-adenosyl-methionine (Figure A4 in Appendix). Evidence for a cellular stress response was strongest under S limitation, and this included enrichment of transcripts for a thiol-containing antioxidant protein, a universal stress protein, and a σ32 factor (rpoH-2), along with the gene ppk2 (Table A4 in Appendix), which degrades polyphosphate to GTP and is implicated in bacterial stress responses (Brown and Kornberg, 2008; Gangaiah et al., 2010).

The S-limited transcriptome provided a useful perspective on transcriptional responses to limitation by an element that is not naturally limiting in the ocean (seawater SO4 concentrations are ∼28 mmol l−1) and therefore for which there is little selective pressure to evolve responses to scarcity. The biasing of the S-limited transcriptome toward biosynthetic pathways with depleted end products, while a successful strategy for addressing metabolic imbalances in bacteria (Goyal et al., 2010), cannot solve a cell-wide elemental deficit. In E. coli, scavenging responses occur through the CysB system that upregulates transporters for sulfate, cysteine, and alternate sources of S (Gyaneshwar et al., 2005). However, the R. pomeroyi DSS-3 genome does not contain a CysB ortholog.

The fact that S limitation was the only condition that did not invoke a scavenging response for obtaining more of the limiting element indicates that transcriptional regulation in R. pomeroyi is not evolutionarily attuned for S limitation. By analogy, the absence of an N storage response may indicate that conditions under which excess N is available for transport and storage by bacterioplankton are rare in the ocean. Indeed, a search of the marine bacterioplankton genes captured in the Global Ocean Sampling (GOS) dataset (Rusch et al., 2007; Yooseph et al., 2007) indicated that fewer than 3% of surface ocean bacterioplankton have homologs for cysB. Similarly, fewer than 1% of bacterioplankton carry homologs for either of the two genes required for N storage (CPG synthetase and cyanophycinase; Table A7 in Appendix). Transcriptional responses of R. pomeroyi may therefore provide insights into the role of seawater chemistry in molding the evolution of marine bacterioplankton genome content.

Explaining cell stoichiometry changes

To link transcriptional responses to cell stoichiometry under different element limitations, we estimated the composition of R. pomeroyi biomass under balanced growth (i.e., when all elements are available in excess and the C:N:P ratio is optimal); this is the conceptual starting point from which the cells’ transcriptional responses produced the observed element-limited ratios (Table 1). The simplest model, one in which C:N:P ratios under element limitation are reached through a proportional change in only the limiting element, fit our data well. This does not necessarily require that C, N, and P are unlinked in the cell, but rather that the net result of resource limitation is a decrease in only the limiting element, where αX is the factor by which element x (c, n, or p) changes when it is limiting. The best solution to the elemental ratio data emerged with a C:N:P of ∼154:15:1 under balanced growth (Figure 1). From this initial ratio, C-limited cells (56:13:1; Table 1) would have undergone a relative C decrease to 38% of balanced growth levels (αC = 1/0.38), P-limited cells (333:35:1) would have undergone a relative P decrease to 40% of balanced growth (αP = 1/0.4), but N-limited cells (167:15:1) would have undergone almost no change in N content (αN = 1/1.0; Figure 1).

Figure 1

The transcriptional changes in R. pomeroyi strongly support this model. Only the C- and P-limited cells exhibited reworking strategies to decrease cell quotas (degradation of stored reserves, decreases in production or secretion of extracellular products, restructuring of membranes; Table 2). Only the N-limited cells showed a substantial gate-keeping response and tightening of control over cytoplasmic pools (Table 2). It is not yet evident whether strong N homeostasis compared to C and P is a feature that can be generalized to other heterotrophic marine bacterioplankton, although R. pomeroyi represents a ubiquitous bacterial taxon in surface ocean waters (Moran et al., 2004) and its growth rate in the continuous cultures was within the range measured for marine bacterioplankton in situ (Ducklow and Hill, 1985; Whitman et al., 1998). Four unidentified marine bacterial isolates studied by Vrede et al. (2002) did not show a similar N homeostasis (Figure A5 in Appendix), although they were not grown in continuous culture. Elemental ratios measured for natural bacterioplankton typically do not fall within the balanced growth region for R. pomeroyi (Figure 1) and are a better match to the ratios found under C limitation, suggesting that marine bacteria may be most often C-limited in the ocean.

A central concept in stoichiometric ecology is that growth rate changes drive differences in biomass elemental composition through shifts in the content of P-rich RNA (Sterner et al., 2008). For marine microbes, this growth rate hypothesis (GRH) will be most relevant when bacterioplankton are growing at different rates, such as during phytoplankton blooms or mixing events relative to non-bloom conditions or dormancy. By comparison, R. pomeroyi was studied under constant growth rate but differing stoichiometry of external resources, a scenario more relevant when the element limiting heterotrophic growth varies over time or space (e.g., Thingstad, 1987; Kirchman, 1990; Pomeroy et al., 1995; Cherrier et al., 1996; Cotner et al., 1997; Kirchman and Rich, 1997; Zohary and Robarts, 1998; Torréton et al., 2000; Van Wambeke et al., 2002; Obernosterer et al., 2003; Thingstad et al., 2005). In exploring stoichiometric changes predicted under the GRH, Loladze and Elser (2011) calculated a microbial protein:rRNA ratio of 3 under optimal growth conditions (cellular N:P ratio = 16). Our balanced growth-stoichiometry calculation for R. pomeroyi agrees with this (N:P ratio = 15; Figure 1). Under non-optimal conditions however, which are commonplace in the ocean, transcriptional responses of heterotrophic bacteria can drive biomass C:N:P ratios from this ideal value through physiological mechanisms that store certain elements when available in excess and strongly retain others when scarce. The consistency of transcriptional reactions among the diverse taxa that make up marine bacterial assemblages will determine the aggregate community response to element limitation in the ocean (Hall et al., 2011; Scott et al., 2012).

Conclusion

Bacterioplankton transcriptional changes reveal the cellular basis for biomass stoichiometry outcomes whose effects are manifested at the ecosystem level. Flexible biomass ratios provide a buffer in the development of nutrient limitation (Thingstad et al., 2008) and, at least in the short term, delay intensification of bacterial–phytoplankton competition. Stoichiometric flexibility also broadens the range of C:N:P ratios in bacterial biomass produced in ocean surface waters, with consequences for basin-scale differences in particulate material and sequestration of organic matter deviating from Redfield proportions (Geider and La Roche, 2002; Hessen et al., 2004; Sterner et al., 2008; Weber and Deutsch, 2010). For model marine heterotrophic bacterium R. pomeroyi, cellular biomass ratios reflect a net transcriptional balance between element scavenging responses, gate-keeping activities, and cell quota changes, with the balance between these expression responses dictated by which element is limiting its growth.

Statements

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation and the National Science Foundation (OCE-0724017). We thank J. Rinta-Kanto for advice on microarray analysis, C. Reisch and W. Whitman for guidance on chemostat setup, Y. Liu for advice on amino acid analysis, and C. English for graphics assistance.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  • 1

    NeidhardtF. C.CurtissR.IngrahamJ. L.LinE. C. C.LowK. B.MagasanikB.ReznikoffW. S.RileyM.SchaechterM.UmbargerH. E. (eds). (1996). Escherichia coli and Salmonella: Cellular and Molecular Biology, 2nd Edn.Washington, DC: ASM Press.

References

  • 1

    AndersonA. J.DawesE. A. (1990). Occurrence, metabolism, metabolic role, and industrial uses of bacterial polyhydroxyalkanoates. Microbiol. Rev.54, 450472.

  • 2

    AzamF.FenchelT.FieldJ. G.GrayJ. S.Meyer-ReilL. A.ThingstadF. (1983). The ecological role of water-column microbes in the sea. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.10, 257263.10.3354/meps010257

  • 3

    BradfordM. M. (1976). A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem.72, 248254.10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3

  • 4

    BrazmaA.HingampP.QuackenbushJ.SherlockG.SpellmanP.StoeckertC.AachJ.AnsorgeW.BallC. A.CaustonH. C.GaasterlandT.GlenissonP.HolstegeF. C.KimI. F.MarkowitzV.MateseJ. C.ParkinsonH.RobinsonA.SarkansU.Schulze-KremerS.StewartJ.TaylorR.ViloJ.VingronM. (2001). Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)-toward standards for microarray data. Nat. Genet.29, 365371.10.1038/ng1201-365

  • 5

    BrownM. R.KornbergA. (2008). The long and short of it- polyphosphate, PPK and bacterial survival. Trends Biochem. Sci.33, 284290.10.1016/j.tibs.2008.04.009

  • 6

    BürgmannH.HowardE. C.YeW.SunF.SunS.NapieralaS.MoranM. A. (2007). Transcriptional response of Silicibacter pomeroyi DSS-3 to dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP). Environ. Microbiol.9, 27422755.10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01386.x

  • 7

    CherrierJ.BauerJ. E.DruffelE. R. M. (1996). Utilization and turnover of labile dissolved organic matter by bacterial heterotrophs in eastern north Pacific surface waters. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.139, 267279.10.3354/meps139267

  • 8

    CotnerJ. B.AmmermanJ. W.PeeleE. R.BentzenE. (1997). Phosphorus-limited bacterioplankton growth in the Sargasso Sea. Aquat. Microb. Ecol.13, 141149.10.3354/ame013141

  • 9

    CotnerJ. B.HallE. K.ScottJ. T.HeldalM. (2010). Freshwater bacteria are stoichiometrically flexible with a nutrient composition similar to seston. Front. Microbiol.1:132.10.3389/fmicb.2010.00132

  • 10

    DawesE. A.SeniorP. J. (1973). The role and regulation of energy reserve polymers in micro-organisms. Adv. Microb. Physiol.10, 135266.10.1016/S0065-2911(08)60088-0

  • 11

    del GiorgioP. A.ColeJ. J. (1998). Bacterial growth efficiency in natural aquatic systems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.29, 503541.10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.503

  • 12

    DucklowH. W.HillS. M. (1985). The growth of heterotrophic bacteria in the surface waters of warm core rings. Limnol. Oceanogr.30, 239259.10.4319/lo.1985.30.2.0260

  • 13

    ElserJ. J.DobberfuhlD. R.MacKayN. A.SchampelJ. H. (1996). Organism size, life history, and N:P stoichiometry. Bioscience46, 674684.10.2307/1312897

  • 14

    ElserJ. J.StablerL. B.HassettR. P. (1995). Nutrient limitation of bacterial-growth and rates of bacterivory in lakes and oceans: a comparative study. Aquat. Microb. Ecol.9, 105110.10.3354/ame009105

  • 15

    FagerbakkeK. M.HeldalM.NorlandS. (1996). Content of carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, sulfur and phosphorus in native aquatic and cultured bacteria. Aquat. Microb. Ecol.10, 1527.10.3354/ame010015

  • 16

    FerenciT. (2008). Bacterial physiology, regulation and mutational adaptation in a chemostat environment. Adv. Microb. Physiol.53, 169229.10.1016/S0065-2911(07)53003-1

  • 17

    FranklinO.HallE. K.KaiserC.RichterA.BattinT. (2011). Optimization of biomass composition explains microbial growth-stoichiometry relationships. Am. Nat.177, E29E42.10.1086/657684

  • 18

    FüserG.SteinbüchelA. (2007). Analysis of genome sequences for genes of cyanophycin metabolism: identifying putative cyanophycin metabolizing prokaryotes. Macromol. Biosci.7, 278296.10.1002/mabi.200600207

  • 19

    GangaiahD.LiuZ.ArcosJ.KassemI. I.SanadY.TorrellesJ. B.RajashekaraG. (2010). Polyphosphate kinase 2: a novel determinant of stress responses and pathogenesis in Campylobacter jejuni. PLoS ONE5, e12142.10.1371/journal.pone.0012142

  • 20

    GaoJ. L.WeissenmayerB.TaylorA. M.Thomas-OatesJ.López-LaraI. M.GeigerO. (2004). Identification of a gene required for the formation of lyso-ornithine lipid, an intermediate in the biosynthesis of ornithine-containing lipids. Mol. Microbiol.53, 17571770.10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04261.x

  • 21

    GeiderR. J.La RocheJ. (2002). Redfield revisited: variability of C:N:P in marine microalgae and its biochemical basis. Eur. J. Phycol.37, 117.10.1017/S0967026201003456

  • 22

    GoldmanJ. C.CaronD. A.DennettM. R. (1987). Regulation of gross growth efficiency and ammonium regeneration in bacteria by substrate C:N ratio. Limnol. Oceanogr.32, 12391252.10.4319/lo.1987.32.6.1239

  • 23

    GonzálezJ. M.CovertJ. S.WhitmanW. B.HenriksenJ. R.MayerF.ScharfB.SchmittR.BuchanA.FuhrmanJ. A.KieneR. P.MoranM. A. (2003). Silicibacter pomeroyi sp. nov. and Roseovarius nubinhibens sp. nov., dimethylsulfoniopropionate-demethylating bacteria from marine environments. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.53, 12611269.10.1099/ijs.0.02491-0

  • 24

    GoyalS.YuanJ.ChenT.RabinowitzJ. D.WingreenN. S. (2010). Achieving optimal growth through product feedback inhibition in metabolism. PLoS Comput. Biol.6, e1000802.10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000802

  • 25

    GundersenK.HeldalM.PurdieD. A.KnapA. H. (2002). Elemental C, N, and P cell content of individual bacteria collected at the Bermuda Atlantic Time-series Study (BATS) site. Limnol. Oceanogr.47, 15251530.10.4319/lo.2002.47.5.1525

  • 26

    GyaneshwarP.PaliyO.McAuliffeJ.PophamD. L.JordanM. I.KustuS. (2005). Sulfur and nitrogen limitation in Escherichia coli K-12: specific homeostatic responses. J. Bacteriol.187, 10741090.10.1128/JB.187.3.1074-1090.2005

  • 27

    HallE. K.MaixnerF.FranklinO.DaimsH.RichterA.BattinT. (2011). Linking microbial and ecosystem ecology using ecological stoichiometry: a synthesis of conceptual and empirical approaches. Ecosystems14, 261273.10.1007/s10021-010-9408-4

  • 28

    HarderW.DijkhuizenL. (1983). Physiological responses to nutrient limitation. Annu. Rev. Microbiol.37, 123.10.1146/annurev.mi.37.100183.000245

  • 29

    HendricksonE. L.LiuY.Rosas-SandovalG.PoratI.SöllD.WhitmanW. B.LeighJ. A. (2008). Global responses of Methanococcus maripaludis to specific nutrient limitations and growth rate. J. Bacteriol.190, 21982205.10.1128/JB.01805-07

  • 30

    HenriksenJ. R. (2008). Physiology of Dimethylsulfoniopropionate Metabolism in a Model Marine Roseobacter, Silicibacter pomeroyi. Ph.D. thesis, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.

  • 31

    HessenD. O.AgrenG. I.AndersonT. R.ElserJ. J.De RuiterP. C. (2004). Carbon sequestration in ecosystems: the role of stoichiometry. Ecology85, 11791192.10.1890/02-0251

  • 32

    IkedaT. P.ShaugerA. E.KustuS. (1996). Salmonella typhimurium apparently perceives external nitrogen limitation as internal glutamine limitation. J. Mol. Biol.259, 589607.10.1006/jmbi.1996.0349

  • 33

    IshigeK.NoguchiT. (2000). Inorganic polyphosphate kinase and adenylate kinase participate in the polyphosphate:AMP phosphotransferase activity of Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.97, 1416814171.10.1073/pnas.011518098

  • 34

    KirchmanD.RichJ. (1997). Regulation of bacterial growth rates by dissolved organic carbon and temperature in the Equatorial Pacific Ocean. Microb. Ecol.33, 1120.10.1007/s002489900003

  • 35

    KirchmanD. L. (1990). Limitation of bacterial growth by dissolved organic matter in the subartic Pacific. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.62, 4754.10.3354/meps062047

  • 36

    KornbergA. (1999). Inorganic polyphosphate: a molecule of many functions. Prog. Mol. Subcell. Biol.23, 118.10.1007/978-3-642-58444-2_1

  • 37

    KranzR. G.GabbertK. K.LockeT. A.MadiganM. T. (1997). Polyhydroxyalkanoate production in Rhodobacter capsulatus: genes, mutants, expression, and physiology. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.63, 30033009.

  • 38

    KulaevI. S.BobykM. A.NikolaevN. N.SergeevN. S.UrysonS. O. (1971). Polyphosphate synthesizing enzymes in some fungi and bacteria. Biochemistry36, 791796.

  • 39

    LoladzeI.ElserJ. J. (2011). The origins of the Redfield nitrogen-to-phosphorus ratio are in a homoeostatic protein-to-rRNA ratio. Ecol. Lett.14, 244250.10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01577.x

  • 40

    MartinussenI.ThingstadT. F. (1987). Utilization of organic N, organic P and organic C by heterotrophic bacteria. 2. Comparison of experiments and a mathematical model. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.37, 285293.10.3354/meps037285

  • 41

    MatsenF. A.KodnerR. B.ArmbrustE. V. (2010). Pplacer: linear time maximum-likelihood and Bayesian phylogenetic placement of sequences onto a fixed reference tree. BMC Bioinformatics11, 538.10.1186/1471-2105-11-538

  • 42

    MetcalfW. W.WannerB. L. (1991). Involvement of the Escherichia coli phn (psiD) gene cluster in assimilation of phosphorus in the form of phosphonates, phosphite, Pi esters, and Pi. J. Bacteriol.173, 587600.

  • 43

    MoranM. A.BuchanA.GonzálezJ. M.HeidelbergJ. F.WhitmanW. B.KieneR. P.HenriksenJ. R.KingG. M.BelasR.FuquaC.BrinkacL.LewisM.JohriS.WeaverB.PaiG.EisenJ. A.RaheE.SheldonW. M.YeW.MillerT. R.CarltonJ.RaskoD. A.PaulsenI. T.RenQ.DaughertyS. C.DeboyR. T.DodsonR. J.DurkinA. S.MadupuR.NelsonW. C.SullivanS. A.RosovitzM. J.HaftD. H.SelengutJ.WardN. (2004). Genome sequence of Silicibacter pomeroyi reveals adaptations to the marine environment. Nature432, 910913.10.1038/nature03170

  • 44

    MoranM. A.ReischC. R.KieneR. P.WhitmanW. B. (2011). Genomic insights into bacterial DMSP transformations. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci.4, 523542.10.1146/annurev-marine-120710-100827

  • 45

    NahálkaJ.PätoprstýV. (2009). Enzymatic synthesis of sialylation substrates powered by a novel polyphosphate kinase (PPK3). Org. Biomol. Chem.7, 17781780.10.1039/b822549b

  • 46

    NewtonR. J.GriffinL. E.BowlesK. M.MeileC.GiffordS.GivensC. E.HowardE. C.KingE.OakleyC. A.ReischC. R.Rinta-KantoJ. M.SharmaS.SunS.VaraljayV.Vila-CostaM.WestrichJ. R.MoranM. A. (2010). Genome characteristics of a generalist marine bacterial lineage. ISME J.4, 784798.10.1038/ismej.2009.150

  • 47

    ObernostererI.KawasakiN.BennerR. (2003). P-limitation of respiration in the Sargasso Sea and uncoupling of bacteria from P-regeneration in size-fractionation. Aquat. Microb. Ecol.32, 229237.10.3354/ame032229

  • 48

    ParkerG. F.HigginsT. P.HawkesT.RobsonR. L. (1999). Rhizobium (Sinorhizobium) meliloti phn genes: characterization and identification of their protein products. J. Bacteriol.181, 389395.

  • 49

    PomeroyL. R.SheldonJ. E.SheldonW. M. J.PetersF. (1995). Limits to growth and respiration of bacterioplankton in the Gulf of Mexico. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.117, 259268.10.3354/meps117259

  • 50

    PoretskyR. S.GiffordS. M.Rinta-KantoJ. M.Vila-CostaM.MoranM. A. (2009). Analyzing gene expression from marine microbial communities using environmental transcriptomics. J. Vis. Exp.24: e1086.10.3791/1086

  • 51

    RedfieldA. C. (1934). “On the proportions of organic derivations in seawater and their relation to the composition of plankton,” in James Johnstone Memorial Volume, ed. Daniel (Liverpool: University Press), 177192.

  • 52

    Rinta-KantoJ. M.BürgmannH.GiffordS. M.SunS.SharmaS.del ValleD. A.KieneR. P.MoranM. A. (2010). Analysis of sulfur-related transcription by Roseobacter communities using a taxon-specific functional gene microarray. Environ. Microbiol.13, 453467.10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02350.x

  • 53

    RivkinR. B.AndersonM. R. (1997). Inorganic nutrient limitation of oceanic bacterioplankton. Limnol. Oceanogr.42, 730740.10.4319/lo.1997.42.4.0730

  • 54

    RuschD. B.HalpernA. L.SuttonG.HeidelbergK. B.WilliamsonS.YoosephS.WuD.EisenJ. A.HoffmanJ. M.RemingtonK.BeesonK.TranB.SmithH.Baden-TillsonH.StewartC.ThorpeJ.FreemanJ.Andrews-PfannkochC.VenterJ. E.LiK.KravitzS.HeidelbergJ. F.UtterbackT.RogersY. H.FalcónL. I.SouzaV.Bonilla-RossoG.EguiarteL. E.KarlD. M.SathyendranathS.PlattT.BerminghamE.GallardoV.Tamayo-CastilloG.FerrariM. R.StrausbergR. L.NealsonK.FriedmanR.FrazierM.VenterJ. C. (2007). The Sorcerer II Global Ocean Sampling expedition: Northwest Atlantic through Eastern Tropical Pacific. PLoS Biol.5, 77.10.1371/journal.pbio.0050077

  • 55

    SaeedA. I.BhagabatiN. K.BraistedJ. C.LiangW.SharovV.HoweE. A.LiJ.ThiagarajanM.WhiteJ. A.QuackenbushJ. (2006). TM4 microarray software suite. Meth. Enzymol.411, 134193.10.1016/S0076-6879(06)11009-5

  • 56

    ScottJ. T.CotnerJ. B.LaParaT. M. (2012). Variable stoichiometry and homeostatic regulation of bacterial biomass elemental composition. Front. Microbiol.3:42.10.3389/fmicb.2012.00042

  • 57

    SebastianM.AmmermanJ. W. (2011). Role of the phosphatase PhoX in the phosphorus metabolism of the marine bacterium Ruegeria pomeroyi DSS-3. Environ. Microbiol. Rep.3, 535542.10.1111/j.1758-2229.2011.00253.x

  • 58

    SolorzanoL. (1969). Determination of ammonia in natural waters by the phenolhypochlorite method. Limnol. Oceanogr.14, 799801.10.4319/lo.1969.14.5.0799

  • 59

    SternerR. W.AndersenT.ElserJ. J.HessenD. O.HoodJ. M.McCauleyE.UrabeJ. (2008). Scale-dependent carbon: nitrogen: phosphorus seston stoichiometry in marine and freshwaters. Limnol. Oceanogr.53, 11691180.10.4319/lo.2008.53.3.1169

  • 60

    StricklandJ. D. H.ParsonsT. R. (1972). A Practical Handbook of Seawater Analysis, 2nd Edn.Ottawa: Fish Res Board Can.

  • 61

    TezukaY. (1990). Bacterial regeneration of ammonium and phosphate as affected by the carbon:nitrogen:phosphorus ratio of organic substrates. Microb. Ecol.19, 227238.10.1007/BF02017167

  • 62

    ThingstadT. F. (1987). Utilization of N, P, and organic C by heterotrophic bacteria. 1. Outline of a chemostat theory with a consistent concept of maintenance metabolism. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.35, 99109.10.3354/meps035099

  • 63

    ThingstadT. F.BellerbyR. G.BratbakG.BørsheimK. Y.EggeJ. K.HeldalM.LarsenA.NeillC.NejstgaardJ.NorlandS.SandaaR.-A.SkjoldalE. F.TanakaT.ThyrhaugR.TöpperB. (2008). Counterintuitive carbon-to-nutrient coupling in an Arctic pelagic ecosystem. Nature455, 387390.10.1038/nature07235

  • 64

    ThingstadT. F.KromM. D.MantouraR. F.FlatenG. A.GroomS.HerutB.KressN.LawC. S.PasternakA.PittaP.PsarraS.RassoulzadeganF.TanakaT.TselepidesA.WassmannP.WoodwardE. M. S.Wexels RiserC.ZodiatisG.ZoharyT. (2005). Nature of phosphorus limitation in the ultraoligotrophic eastern Mediterranean. Science309, 10681071.10.1126/science.1112632

  • 65

    TorrétonJ. P.TalbotV.GarciaN. (2000). Nutrient stimulation of bacterioplankton growth in Tuamotu atoll lagoons. Aquat. Microb. Ecol.21, 125137.10.3354/ame021125

  • 66

    TusherV. G.TibshiraniR.ChuG. (2001). Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.98, 51165121.10.1073/pnas.091062498

  • 67

    Van MooyB. A.FredricksH. F.PedlerB. E.DyhrmanS. T.KarlD. M.KoblizekM.LomasM. W.MincerT. J.MooreL. R.MoutinT.RappéM. S.WebbE. A. (2009). Phytoplankton in the ocean use non-phosphorus lipids in response to phosphorus scarcity. Nature458, 6972.10.1038/nature07659

  • 68

    Van WambekeF.ChristakiU.GiannakourouA.MoutinT.SouvemerzoglouK. (2002). Longitudinal and vertical trends of bacterial limitation by phosphorus and carbon in the Mediterranean Sea. Microb. Ecol.43, 119133.10.1007/s00248-001-0038-4

  • 69

    VredeK.HeldalM.NorlandS.BratbakG. (2002). Elemental composition (C, N, P) and cell volume of exponentially growing and nutrient-limited bacterioplankton. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.68, 29652971.10.1128/AEM.68.6.2965-2971.2002

  • 70

    VrljicM.GargJ.BellmannA.WachiS.FreudlR.MaleckiM. J.SahmH.KozinaV. J.EggelingL.SaierM. H.Jr.EggelingL.SaierM. H.Jr. (1999). The LysE superfamily: topology of the lysine exporter LysE of Corynebacterium glutamicum, a paradigm for a novel superfamily of transmembrane solute translocators. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol.1, 327336.

  • 71

    WachiM.DoiM.OkadaY.MatsuhashiM. (1989). New mre genes mreC and mreD, responsible for formation of the rod shape of Escherichia coli cells. J. Bacteriol.171, 65116516.

  • 72

    WalterB.HänsslerE.KalinowskiJ.BurkovskiA. (2007). Nitrogen metabolism and nitrogen control in corynebacteria: variations of a common theme. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol.12, 131138.10.1159/000096468

  • 73

    WeberT. S.DeutschC. (2010). Ocean nutrient ratios governed by plankton biogeography. Nature467, 550554.10.1038/nature09403

  • 74

    WeissenmayerB.GaoJ. L.López-LaraI. M.GeigerO. (2002). Identification of a gene required for the biosynthesis of ornithine-derived lipids. Mol. Microbiol.45, 721733.10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03043.x

  • 75

    WhitmanW. B.ColemanD. C.WiebeW. J. (1998). Prokaryotes: the unseen majority. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.95, 65786583.10.1073/pnas.95.12.6578

  • 76

    YoosephS.SuttonG.RuschD. B.HalpernA. L.WilliamsonS. J.RemingtonK.EisenJ. A.HeidelbergK. B.ManningG.LiW.JaroszewskiL.CieplakP.MillerC. S.LiH.MashiyamaS. T.JoachimiakM. P.van BelleC.ChandoniaJ. M.SoergelD. A.ZhaiY.NatarajanK.LeeS.RaphaelB. J.BafnaV.FriedmanR.BrennerS. E.GodzikA.EisenbergD.DixonJ. E.TaylorS. S.StrausbergR. L.FrazierM.VenterJ. C. (2007). The Sorcerer II Global Ocean Sampling expedition: expanding the universe of protein families. PLoS Biol.5, e16.10.1371/journal.pbio.0050016

  • 77

    YuanZ. C.ZaheerR.FinanT. M. (2006). Regulation and properties of PstSCAB, a high-affinity, high-velocity phosphate transport system of Sinorhizobium meliloti. J. Bacteriol.188, 10891102.10.1128/JB.188.3.1089-1102.2006

  • 78

    YurkovV. V. (2006). “Aerobic phototrophic proteobacteria,” in The Prokaryotes, 3rd Edn, eds DworkinM.FalkowS.RosenbergE.SchleiferK.-H.StachebrandtE. (Singapore: Springer Science and Business Media, LLC), 562584.

  • 79

    ZimmerD. P.SoupeneE.LeeH. L.WendischV. F.KhodurskyA. B.PeterB. J.BenderR. A.KustuS. (2000). Nitrogen regulatory protein C-controlled genes of Escherichia coli: scavenging as a defense against nitrogen limitation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.97, 1467414679.10.1073/pnas.97.26.14674

  • 80

    ZoharyT.RobartsR. D. (1998). Experimental study of microbial P limitation in the eastern Mediterranean. Limnol. Oceanogr.43, 387395.10.4319/lo.1998.43.2.0175

Appendix

Table A1

CompoundConcentration
MACRONUTRIENTa
Glucose (C6H12O6)4.50 mmol l−1 (1.00 mmol l−1)
Phosphate (KH2PO4)0.50 mmol l−1 (9.20 μmol l−1)
Ammonium (NH4Cl)2.80 mmol l−1 (0.26 mmol l−1)
Sulfate (Na2SO4)2.50 mmol l−1 (25.00 μmol l−1)
BUFFER, IRON, AND SALTb
Bis–tris propane (C11H26N2O6)c9.91 mmol l−1
CaCl2·2H2O7.42 mmol l−1
MgCl2106.21 mmol l−1
Iron-EDTA (C10H12FeN2NaO8)d67.52 μmol l−1
KCl10.64 mmol l−1
NaCl198.49 mmol l−1
TRACE ELEMENT
C6H9NO612.95 μmol l−1
CoCl2·6H2O0.80 μmol l−1
Na2SeO31.87 μmol l−1
Na2WO4·2H2O0.55 μmol l−1
BaCl2·2H2O0.49 μmol l−1
CuSO455.57 nmol l−1
MnSO4·H2O0.77 μmol l−1
ZnSO4·7H2O0.54 μmol l−1
Na2MoO4·2H2O0.57 μmol l−1
Na2SiO3·9H2O0.45 μmol l−1
SrCl2·6H2O0.19 mmol l−1
NiCl2·6H2O96.32 nmol l−1
VITAMIN
Thiamine (B1)0.15 μmol l−1
Nicotinic acid (B3)0.40 μmol l−1
Pyridoxine-HCl (B6)0.48 μmol l−1
Folic acid (B9)44.86 nmol l−1
Cyanocobalamin (B12)7.30 nmol l−1
Riboflavin (B2)0.13 μmol l−1
Pantothenic acid (B5)0.23 μmol l−1
Biotin (B7)81.05 nmol l−1
p-aminobenzoic acid (B10)0.36 μmol l−1

Chemostat culture medium.

aLimiting macronutrient in parenthesis.

bFinal salts concentration is 23.6 g l−1 (salinity of ∼25).

cBis–tris propane, 1,3-bis(tris(hydroxymethyl)methylamino)propane.

dIron-EDTA, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid iron (III) sodium salts.

Table A2

C-limitedN-limitedaP-limitedS-limiteda
0.910.920.800.780.790.740.770.700.760.760.74C-limited
0.960.700.750.740.670.660.640.730.690.69
0.720.780.790.660.690.630.710.710.69
0.910.880.760.770.690.670.690.73N-limiteda
0.920.750.750.690.630.690.70
0.680.750.600.580.690.63
0.910.960.750.810.82P-limited
0.890.710.850.79
0.760.810.84
0.820.90S-limiteda
0.87

Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients of the normalized fluorescence values in 5,145 probes between replicate arrays.

aThe coefficient of correlation between the two technical replicate N limitation arrays is 0.89; for the two S limitation arrays is 0.96.

Table A3

OrganismGrowth conditionsaDry weight (fg cell−1)Reference
Ruegeria pomeroyiSteady-state culture, C-limited (dt = 16.5 h)454This study
Steady-state culture, N-limited (dt = 16.5 h)758This study
Steady-state culture, P-limited (dt = 16.5 h)1388This study
Steady-state culture, S-limited (dt = 16.5 h)246This study
Escherichia coliBatch culture in low potassium medium (growing)710bFagerbakke et al. (1996)
Batch culture in low potassium medium (stationary)180bFagerbakke et al. (1996)
Batch culture in glucose minimal medium (dt = 40 min)280cNeidhardt et al. (1996)
Vibrio natriegensBatch culture in brain heart infusion medium (growing)850bFagerbakke et al. (1996)
Batch culture in brain heart infusion medium (stationary)145bFagerbakke et al. (1996)
Natural marine bacterioplankton isolateBatch culture (exponential)427dVrede et al. (2002)
Batch culture, C-limited (stationary)110dVrede et al. (2002)
Batch culture, N-limited (stationary)276dVrede et al. (2002)
Batch culture, P-limited (stationary)270dVrede et al. (2002)
Native isolates from various aquatic environments21–60eFagerbakke et al. (1996)

Bacterial dry weights.

adt = doubling time (specified if available).

bData from Table 1 (Fagerbakke et al., 1996).

cCalculated with data in page 14 (Neidhardt et al., 1996) with an assumption that 70% of cytoplasm is water.

dData from Table 3 (Vrede et al., 2002). Average of four isolates (exponential and C-limited cultures), three isolates (N-limited cultures), or two isolates (P-limited cultures).

eNative bacteria were from aquatic environments in Norway, Finland, and Denmark (see Table 1 in Fagerbakke et al., 1996).

Table A4

Locus tagGeneProductFold-change ratioa
Probe 1Probe 2
C-LIMITED (68 GENES)
SPO0090Hypothetical protein5.3
SPO0107recQATP-dependent DNA helicase1.06.3
SPO0120Hypothetical protein3.9
SPO0149dnaAChromosomal replication initiation protein16.51.2
SPO0171fliRFlagellar biosynthetic protein1.36.7
SPO0183fliIH+-transporting two-sector ATPase, flagellum-specific6.31.0
SPO0265Auxin efflux carrier family protein2.14.4
SPO0276LuxR family transcriptional regulator0.83.0
SPO0590LacI family transcription regulator (carbon catabolite repression domain-containing)14.5
SPO0875gap-2Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, type I8.41.3
SPO0911proCPyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase3.23.2
SPO0939M48 family peptidase1.18.5
SPO0940Hypothetical protein3.4
SPO0970apqZAquaporin Z3.11.3
SPO0988YeeE/YedE family protein1.13.0
SPO0999soxDDiheme cytochrome c1.43.8
SPO1001soxFSulfur oxidation F protein3.2
SPO1063Hypothetical protein1.23.3
SPO1092LysR family transcriptional regulator3.01.8
SPO1132Glycine betaine/proline ABC transporter, ATP-binding protein3.13.0
SPO1138AsnC family transcriptional regulator6.24.7
SPO1156hisFImidazole glycerol phosphate synthase subunit3.03.5
SPO1337Hypothetical protein3.9
SPO1446Cyclase, putative3.8
SPO1463TRAP dicarboxylate transporter, DctM subunit8.3
SPO1499Alpha/beta fold family hydrolase5.21.4
SPO1592Aminomethyl transferase family protein2.33.4
SPO1645Oligopeptide/dipeptide ABC transporter, permease protein4.6
SPO1702Hypothetical protein3.6
SPO17743-hydroxyanthranilate 3,4-dioxygenase3.3
SPO1796Formate dehydrogenase, alpha subunit, putative3.44.7
SPO1807DNA polymerase III epsilon subunit family exonuclease3.71.0
SPO2029Glutamine amidotransferase class-II3.4
SPO2166Putative lipoprotein0.63.3
SPO2205ErfK/YbiS/YcfS/YnhG family protein7.20.5
SPO2301OsmC-like family protein5.2
SPO2306Hypothetical protein3.4
SPO2325serSSeryl-tRNA synthetase3.2
SPO2370Sodium:alanine symporter family protein3.4
SPO2371Universal stress protein family protein4.41.8
SPO2422d-isomer specific 2-hydroxyacid dehydrogenase family protein6.4
SPO2644VWA domain CoxE-like family protein11.3
SPO2647Hypothetical protein3.0
SPO2668LysR family transcriptional regulator3.21.1
SPO2747Diguanylate cyclase, putative3.7
SPO2845Hypothetical protein3.8
SPO2881Xanthine dehydrogenase family protein, large subunit5.01.0
SPO2989Cytochrome b5623.11.4
SPO3121MATE efflux family protein4.30.9
SPO3291Branched-chain amino acid ABC transporter, periplasmic5.54.0
SPO3407Hypothetical protein1.75.7
SPO3461Flagellar protein FlgJ, putative8.5
SPO3552Oxidoreductase, FAD-binding3.2
SPO3562tauRTranscriptional regulator5.21.5
SPO3577Hypothetical protein3.8
SPO3589Hypothetical protein3.00.8
SPO3641ABC transporter, permease protein1.23.7
SPO3734MerR family transcriptional regulator4.2
SPO3735Major facilitator family protein1.46.2
SPO3737Pyridine nucleotide-disulfide oxidoreductase family protein4.4
SPO3764Glutathione S-transferase family protein1.26.8
SPO3783Sugar ABC transporter, ATP-binding protein8.0
SPOA0097Branched-chain amino acid ABC transporter, permease protein3.61.4
SPOA0160TRAP dicarboxylate transporter, DctM subunit8.7
SPOA0247Hypothetical protein3.0
SPOA0289AraC family transcriptional regulator4.1
SPOA0299Branched-chain amino acid ABC transporter, permease protein0.93.7
SPOA0317AsnC family transcriptional regulator10.13.0
N-LIMITED (35 GENES)
SPO0021Hpt domain-containing protein3.3
SPO0161LuxR family DNA-binding response regulator3.10.8
SPO0296Hypothetical protein4.63.0
SPO0322Hypothetical protein3.96.5
SPO0327EAL domain-containing protein0.44.9
SPO0438ErfK/YbiS/YcfS/YnhG family protein1.53.0
SPO0804ihfBIntegration host factor subunit beta3.01.4
SPO0860Xylose repressor, putative3.23.2
SPO0919MarR family transcriptional regulator3.32.8
SPO1078Chromosome replication initiation inhibitor protein3.0
SPO1275Cold shock family protein2.53.5
SPO1286Hypothetical protein0.53.7
SPO1384MarR family transcriptional regulator4.41.4
SPO1707Urea transporter, ATP-binding protein (urtE)3.83.0
SPOA0447bUrea transporter, ATP-binding protein (urtD)5.5
SPO1708Urea transporter, permease protein (urtC)11.6
SPO1808Hypothetical protein4.6
SPO1853TetR family transcriptional regulator3.0
SPO1872LysR family transcriptional regulator6.22.1
SPO1911Hypothetical protein1.14.3
SPO2067Hypothetical protein6.5
SPO2087ntrCNitrogen regulation protein1.14.3
SPO2224Hypothetical protein2.24.1
SPO2294glnB-1Nitrogen regulatory protein PII9.06.6
SPO2295glnAGlutamine synthetase, type I4.75.1
SPO2364Amino acid ABC transporter, periplasmic binding protein1.34.1
SPO2602RpiR family transcriptional regulator5.12.2
SPO2778Hypothetical protein3.01.5
SPO2818Hypothetical protein4.93.0
SPO3607Hypothetical protein4.60.6
SPO3723amt-2Ammonium transporter28.0
SPO3724glnB-2Nitrogen regulatory protein PII124.339.1
SPOA0280TRAP dicarboxylate transporter, DctP subunit, putative7.94.5
SPOA0300Branched-chain amino acid ABC transporter, periplasmic binding protein6.6
SPOA0399R body protein RebB-like protein5.6
P-LIMITED (20 GENES)
SPO0147Enoyl-CoA hydratase4.33.0
SPO0304Putative lipoprotein7.05.4
SPO0468phnGAlkylphosphonate utilization protein5.2
SPO0472phnKPhosphonate C-P lyase system protein10.9
SPO0505rplORibosomal protein L153.25.7
SPO0781phnDPhosphonate ABC transporter, periplasmic binding protein103.5
SPO1227Hypothetical protein3.2
SPO1504pqqACoenzyme PQQ biosynthesis protein A5.14.7
SPO1860Twin-arginine translocation pathway signal sequence domain-containing protein7.4
SPO1928Tat pathway signal sequence domain-containing protein3.50.7
SPO1948pstSPhosphate ABC transporter, periplasmic binding protein47.9
SPO1949pstCPhosphate ABC transporter, permease protein4.7
SPO1951pstBPhosphate transporter ATP-binding protein7.4
SPO1953phoBPhosphate regulon transcriptional regulatory protein10.726.1
SPO2626TRAP transporter, DctM subunit1.84.2
SPO2627TRAP transporter, DctQ subunit3.3
SPO3198rncRibonuclease III4.11.6
SPO3625cspACold shock protein2.64.2
SPO3868Hypothetical protein1.63.6
SPOA0294pmtAPhosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase3.61.2
S-LIMITED (11 GENES)
SPO0412Hypothetical protein13.2
SPO0636EF hand domain-containing protein3.9
SPO1256ppk2Polyphosphate kinase 25.04.0
SPO1330hflCHflC protein4.03.5
SPO1409rpoH-2RNA polymerase factor sigma-3212.5
SPO2596hemA-15-amino-levulinate synthase1.84.6
SPO2632cobA-1Uroporphyrin-III C-methyltransferase3.45.9
SPO2634Sulfite reductase, putative5.75.3
SPO3383Thiol-specific antioxidant protein4.94.5
SPO3527Universal stress protein family protein3.75.3
SPO3532hemNCoproporphyrinogen III oxidase7.3

Transcriptionally enriched R. pomeroyi DSS-3 genes.

aAs the median value between limitation-to-excess pairwise comparisons.

bSPOA0047 is a chromosomal gene.

Light gray shading indicates genes included in Table 2.

Table A5

Locus tagGeneProductFold-change ratioa
Probe 1Probe 2
C-LIMITED (12 GENES)
SPO0416mreDRod shape-determining protein0.3
SPO0956Hypothetical protein0.3
SPO1244efpElongation factor P0.30.3
SPO1293phaPPhasin0.10.1
SPO1756Polysaccharide biosynthesis/export protein0.30.7
SPO1868Glutaredoxin-related protein0.40.3
SPO2135Hypothetical protein0.3
SPO3022valSValyl-tRNA synthetase0.3
SPO3253rpsP30S ribosomal protein S162.00.2
SPO3658d-alanyl-d-alanine carboxypeptidase family protein0.40.3
SPO3840rpsO30S ribosomal protein S150.20.2
SPOA0031nqrDNa+-translocating NADH-quinone reductase subunit D0.50.3
N-LIMITED (34 GENES)
SPO0227PaxA, putative0.30.2
SPO0406rpoH-2RNA polymerase factor sigma-320.60.3
SPO0862xylHXylose ABC transporter, permease protein0.30.3
SPO1060Hypothetical protein0.1
SPO1079Lysine exporter, putative0.12.0
SPO1308Hypothetical protein0.3
SPO1336ispZIntracellular septation protein A0.60.3
SPO1685tRNA synthetase, class I family protein0.1
SPO1743Glutamate dehydrogenase0.20.2
SPO1747Sarcosine oxidase gamma subunit family protein1.20.2
SPO1954LysR family transcriptional regulator1.70.2
SPO2071Bcr/CflA subfamily drug resistance transporter0.30.3
SPO2271fabF3-oxoacyl-(acyl carrier protein) synthase II0.50.3
SPO2373Hypothetical protein0.1
SPO2414Mandelate racemase/muconate lactonizing enzyme family protein0.3
SPO2556Allantoate amidohydrolase0.2
SPO2592Beta-lactamase, putative1.00.3
SPO2616tgtQueuine tRNA-ribosyltransferase0.70.3
SPO3012Inositol-1-monophosphatase, putative0.10.2
SPO3156l-threonine aldolase, low-specificity, putative1.30.3
SPO3419UbiH/UbiF/VisC/COQ6 family ubiquinone biosynthesis hydroxylase1.90.3
SPO3437Mechanosensitive ion channel family protein0.20.3
SPO3484HSP20 family protein0.50.2
SPO3712asdAspartate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase0.20.3
SPO3720tyrBAromatic amino acid aminotransferase0.30.9
SPO3731Glycerophosphoryl diester phosphodiesterase, putative0.3
SPO3752Radical SAM domain-containing protein0.20.7
SPOA0011metKS-adenosylmethionine synthetase0.20.4
SPOA0057gcvTGlycine cleavage system T protein0.20.3
SPOA0094Hypothetical protein0.2
SPOA0099Branched-chain amino acid ABC transporter, ATP-binding protein0.1
SPOA0115gtdA-2Gentisate 1,2-dioxygenase0.80.1
SPOA0215norQNitric oxide reductase Q protein2.20.1
SPOA0220nirSCytochrome cd1 nitrite reductase0.2
P-LIMITED (NO GENES)
S-LIMITED (10 GENES)
SPO0371luxR-1Autoinducer-binding transcriptional regulator0.00.2
SPO0490Calcium-binding domain–containing protein0.30.3
SPO0491Hypothetical protein0.20.7
SPO1054Hypothetical protein0.3
SPO1221Hypothetical protein0.10.3
SPO1679ctrADNA-binding response regulator0.20.2
SPO2580Hypothetical protein0.10.1
SPO3223Response regulator0.30.2
SPO3673Type I secretion target repeat-containing protein0.30.2
SPOA0337Hypothetical protein0.1

Transcriptionally depleted R. pomeroyi DSS-3 genes.

aCalculated as the median value for limitation-to-excess pairwise comparisons.

Light gray shading indicates genes included in Table 2.

Table A6

Amino acidaN (ng) in free amino acid (mg dry weight)−1
C-limitedN-limitedP-limitedS-limited
Alanine17.134.553.6665.6
Arginine0.00.052.0550.3
Glutamate1405.6123.32310.318142.8
Glycine46.729.257.71196.5
Isoleucine0.011.70.0425.4
Leucine5.013.122.7219.4
Lysine10.628.537.2391.2
Phenylalanine4.712.00.0111.5
Serine0.00.024.8204.5
Threonine3.214.917.7686.4
Valine4.514.119.6395.6
Sum1497.4281.32595.722989.2
%Nb1.30.54.225.5

N content in free amino acids measured in steady-state R. pomeroyi DSS-3 cells.

aAmino acids not listed were below the confidence of detection (verified by manually examining the chromatograms).

bAs the N content in free amino acids divided by whole cell N content (%).

Table A7

Gene functionGene nameNumber of homologsaCells with geneb (%)
S regulationcysB2812.8
Cyanophycin granule synthesisCPG synthetase530.5
Cyanophycin granule synthesisCyanophycinase240.2

Abundance of homologs for cysB and N storage genes in the unassembled Global Ocean Sampling (GOS) metagenomic data set (through the April 2008 release).

aBLASTp analysis was conducted against the GOS peptide database with an E-value ≤ 10 -30 using an experimentally confirmed gene sequence as the query. Candidate homologs were then subjected to phylogenetic analysis using pplacer (Matsen et al., 2010) to confirm homology with genes of known function.

Figure A1

Figure A2

Figure A3

Figure A4

Figure A5

References

  • 1

    NeidhardtF. C.CurtissR.IngrahamJ. L.LinE. C. C.LowK. B.MagasanikB.ReznikoffW. S.RileyM.SchaechterM.UmbargerH. E. (eds). (1996). Escherichia coli and Salmonella: Cellular and Molecular Biology, 2nd Edn.Washington, DC: ASM Press.

References

  • 1

    AndersonA. J.DawesE. A. (1990). Occurrence, metabolism, metabolic role, and industrial uses of bacterial polyhydroxyalkanoates. Microbiol. Rev.54, 450472.

  • 2

    AzamF.FenchelT.FieldJ. G.GrayJ. S.Meyer-ReilL. A.ThingstadF. (1983). The ecological role of water-column microbes in the sea. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.10, 257263.10.3354/meps010257

  • 3

    BradfordM. M. (1976). A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem.72, 248254.10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3

  • 4

    BrazmaA.HingampP.QuackenbushJ.SherlockG.SpellmanP.StoeckertC.AachJ.AnsorgeW.BallC. A.CaustonH. C.GaasterlandT.GlenissonP.HolstegeF. C.KimI. F.MarkowitzV.MateseJ. C.ParkinsonH.RobinsonA.SarkansU.Schulze-KremerS.StewartJ.TaylorR.ViloJ.VingronM. (2001). Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)-toward standards for microarray data. Nat. Genet.29, 365371.10.1038/ng1201-365

  • 5

    BrownM. R.KornbergA. (2008). The long and short of it- polyphosphate, PPK and bacterial survival. Trends Biochem. Sci.33, 284290.10.1016/j.tibs.2008.04.009

  • 6

    BürgmannH.HowardE. C.YeW.SunF.SunS.NapieralaS.MoranM. A. (2007). Transcriptional response of Silicibacter pomeroyi DSS-3 to dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP). Environ. Microbiol.9, 27422755.10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01386.x

  • 7

    CherrierJ.BauerJ. E.DruffelE. R. M. (1996). Utilization and turnover of labile dissolved organic matter by bacterial heterotrophs in eastern north Pacific surface waters. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.139, 267279.10.3354/meps139267

  • 8

    CotnerJ. B.AmmermanJ. W.PeeleE. R.BentzenE. (1997). Phosphorus-limited bacterioplankton growth in the Sargasso Sea. Aquat. Microb. Ecol.13, 141149.10.3354/ame013141

  • 9

    CotnerJ. B.HallE. K.ScottJ. T.HeldalM. (2010). Freshwater bacteria are stoichiometrically flexible with a nutrient composition similar to seston. Front. Microbiol.1:132.10.3389/fmicb.2010.00132

  • 10

    DawesE. A.SeniorP. J. (1973). The role and regulation of energy reserve polymers in micro-organisms. Adv. Microb. Physiol.10, 135266.10.1016/S0065-2911(08)60088-0

  • 11

    del GiorgioP. A.ColeJ. J. (1998). Bacterial growth efficiency in natural aquatic systems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.29, 503541.10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.503

  • 12

    DucklowH. W.HillS. M. (1985). The growth of heterotrophic bacteria in the surface waters of warm core rings. Limnol. Oceanogr.30, 239259.10.4319/lo.1985.30.2.0260

  • 13

    ElserJ. J.DobberfuhlD. R.MacKayN. A.SchampelJ. H. (1996). Organism size, life history, and N:P stoichiometry. Bioscience46, 674684.10.2307/1312897

  • 14

    ElserJ. J.StablerL. B.HassettR. P. (1995). Nutrient limitation of bacterial-growth and rates of bacterivory in lakes and oceans: a comparative study. Aquat. Microb. Ecol.9, 105110.10.3354/ame009105

  • 15

    FagerbakkeK. M.HeldalM.NorlandS. (1996). Content of carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, sulfur and phosphorus in native aquatic and cultured bacteria. Aquat. Microb. Ecol.10, 1527.10.3354/ame010015

  • 16

    FerenciT. (2008). Bacterial physiology, regulation and mutational adaptation in a chemostat environment. Adv. Microb. Physiol.53, 169229.10.1016/S0065-2911(07)53003-1

  • 17

    FranklinO.HallE. K.KaiserC.RichterA.BattinT. (2011). Optimization of biomass composition explains microbial growth-stoichiometry relationships. Am. Nat.177, E29E42.10.1086/657684

  • 18

    FüserG.SteinbüchelA. (2007). Analysis of genome sequences for genes of cyanophycin metabolism: identifying putative cyanophycin metabolizing prokaryotes. Macromol. Biosci.7, 278296.10.1002/mabi.200600207

  • 19

    GangaiahD.LiuZ.ArcosJ.KassemI. I.SanadY.TorrellesJ. B.RajashekaraG. (2010). Polyphosphate kinase 2: a novel determinant of stress responses and pathogenesis in Campylobacter jejuni. PLoS ONE5, e12142.10.1371/journal.pone.0012142

  • 20

    GaoJ. L.WeissenmayerB.TaylorA. M.Thomas-OatesJ.López-LaraI. M.GeigerO. (2004). Identification of a gene required for the formation of lyso-ornithine lipid, an intermediate in the biosynthesis of ornithine-containing lipids. Mol. Microbiol.53, 17571770.10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04261.x

  • 21

    GeiderR. J.La RocheJ. (2002). Redfield revisited: variability of C:N:P in marine microalgae and its biochemical basis. Eur. J. Phycol.37, 117.10.1017/S0967026201003456

  • 22

    GoldmanJ. C.CaronD. A.DennettM. R. (1987). Regulation of gross growth efficiency and ammonium regeneration in bacteria by substrate C:N ratio. Limnol. Oceanogr.32, 12391252.10.4319/lo.1987.32.6.1239

  • 23

    GonzálezJ. M.CovertJ. S.WhitmanW. B.HenriksenJ. R.MayerF.ScharfB.SchmittR.BuchanA.FuhrmanJ. A.KieneR. P.MoranM. A. (2003). Silicibacter pomeroyi sp. nov. and Roseovarius nubinhibens sp. nov., dimethylsulfoniopropionate-demethylating bacteria from marine environments. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.53, 12611269.10.1099/ijs.0.02491-0

  • 24

    GoyalS.YuanJ.ChenT.RabinowitzJ. D.WingreenN. S. (2010). Achieving optimal growth through product feedback inhibition in metabolism. PLoS Comput. Biol.6, e1000802.10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000802

  • 25

    GundersenK.HeldalM.PurdieD. A.KnapA. H. (2002). Elemental C, N, and P cell content of individual bacteria collected at the Bermuda Atlantic Time-series Study (BATS) site. Limnol. Oceanogr.47, 15251530.10.4319/lo.2002.47.5.1525

  • 26

    GyaneshwarP.PaliyO.McAuliffeJ.PophamD. L.JordanM. I.KustuS. (2005). Sulfur and nitrogen limitation in Escherichia coli K-12: specific homeostatic responses. J. Bacteriol.187, 10741090.10.1128/JB.187.3.1074-1090.2005

  • 27

    HallE. K.MaixnerF.FranklinO.DaimsH.RichterA.BattinT. (2011). Linking microbial and ecosystem ecology using ecological stoichiometry: a synthesis of conceptual and empirical approaches. Ecosystems14, 261273.10.1007/s10021-010-9408-4

  • 28

    HarderW.DijkhuizenL. (1983). Physiological responses to nutrient limitation. Annu. Rev. Microbiol.37, 123.10.1146/annurev.mi.37.100183.000245

  • 29

    HendricksonE. L.LiuY.Rosas-SandovalG.PoratI.SöllD.WhitmanW. B.LeighJ. A. (2008). Global responses of Methanococcus maripaludis to specific nutrient limitations and growth rate. J. Bacteriol.190, 21982205.10.1128/JB.01805-07

  • 30

    HenriksenJ. R. (2008). Physiology of Dimethylsulfoniopropionate Metabolism in a Model Marine Roseobacter, Silicibacter pomeroyi. Ph.D. thesis, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.

  • 31

    HessenD. O.AgrenG. I.AndersonT. R.ElserJ. J.De RuiterP. C. (2004). Carbon sequestration in ecosystems: the role of stoichiometry. Ecology85, 11791192.10.1890/02-0251

  • 32

    IkedaT. P.ShaugerA. E.KustuS. (1996). Salmonella typhimurium apparently perceives external nitrogen limitation as internal glutamine limitation. J. Mol. Biol.259, 589607.10.1006/jmbi.1996.0349

  • 33

    IshigeK.NoguchiT. (2000). Inorganic polyphosphate kinase and adenylate kinase participate in the polyphosphate:AMP phosphotransferase activity of Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.97, 1416814171.10.1073/pnas.011518098

  • 34

    KirchmanD.RichJ. (1997). Regulation of bacterial growth rates by dissolved organic carbon and temperature in the Equatorial Pacific Ocean. Microb. Ecol.33, 1120.10.1007/s002489900003

  • 35

    KirchmanD. L. (1990). Limitation of bacterial growth by dissolved organic matter in the subartic Pacific. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.62, 4754.10.3354/meps062047

  • 36

    KornbergA. (1999). Inorganic polyphosphate: a molecule of many functions. Prog. Mol. Subcell. Biol.23, 118.10.1007/978-3-642-58444-2_1

  • 37

    KranzR. G.GabbertK. K.LockeT. A.MadiganM. T. (1997). Polyhydroxyalkanoate production in Rhodobacter capsulatus: genes, mutants, expression, and physiology. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.63, 30033009.

  • 38

    KulaevI. S.BobykM. A.NikolaevN. N.SergeevN. S.UrysonS. O. (1971). Polyphosphate synthesizing enzymes in some fungi and bacteria. Biochemistry36, 791796.

  • 39

    LoladzeI.ElserJ. J. (2011). The origins of the Redfield nitrogen-to-phosphorus ratio are in a homoeostatic protein-to-rRNA ratio. Ecol. Lett.14, 244250.10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01577.x

  • 40

    MartinussenI.ThingstadT. F. (1987). Utilization of organic N, organic P and organic C by heterotrophic bacteria. 2. Comparison of experiments and a mathematical model. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.37, 285293.10.3354/meps037285

  • 41

    MatsenF. A.KodnerR. B.ArmbrustE. V. (2010). Pplacer: linear time maximum-likelihood and Bayesian phylogenetic placement of sequences onto a fixed reference tree. BMC Bioinformatics11, 538.10.1186/1471-2105-11-538

  • 42

    MetcalfW. W.WannerB. L. (1991). Involvement of the Escherichia coli phn (psiD) gene cluster in assimilation of phosphorus in the form of phosphonates, phosphite, Pi esters, and Pi. J. Bacteriol.173, 587600.

  • 43

    MoranM. A.BuchanA.GonzálezJ. M.HeidelbergJ. F.WhitmanW. B.KieneR. P.HenriksenJ. R.KingG. M.BelasR.FuquaC.BrinkacL.LewisM.JohriS.WeaverB.PaiG.EisenJ. A.RaheE.SheldonW. M.YeW.MillerT. R.CarltonJ.RaskoD. A.PaulsenI. T.RenQ.DaughertyS. C.DeboyR. T.DodsonR. J.DurkinA. S.MadupuR.NelsonW. C.SullivanS. A.RosovitzM. J.HaftD. H.SelengutJ.WardN. (2004). Genome sequence of Silicibacter pomeroyi reveals adaptations to the marine environment. Nature432, 910913.10.1038/nature03170

  • 44

    MoranM. A.ReischC. R.KieneR. P.WhitmanW. B. (2011). Genomic insights into bacterial DMSP transformations. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci.4, 523542.10.1146/annurev-marine-120710-100827

  • 45

    NahálkaJ.PätoprstýV. (2009). Enzymatic synthesis of sialylation substrates powered by a novel polyphosphate kinase (PPK3). Org. Biomol. Chem.7, 17781780.10.1039/b822549b

  • 46

    NewtonR. J.GriffinL. E.BowlesK. M.MeileC.GiffordS.GivensC. E.HowardE. C.KingE.OakleyC. A.ReischC. R.Rinta-KantoJ. M.SharmaS.SunS.VaraljayV.Vila-CostaM.WestrichJ. R.MoranM. A. (2010). Genome characteristics of a generalist marine bacterial lineage. ISME J.4, 784798.10.1038/ismej.2009.150

  • 47

    ObernostererI.KawasakiN.BennerR. (2003). P-limitation of respiration in the Sargasso Sea and uncoupling of bacteria from P-regeneration in size-fractionation. Aquat. Microb. Ecol.32, 229237.10.3354/ame032229

  • 48

    ParkerG. F.HigginsT. P.HawkesT.RobsonR. L. (1999). Rhizobium (Sinorhizobium) meliloti phn genes: characterization and identification of their protein products. J. Bacteriol.181, 389395.

  • 49

    PomeroyL. R.SheldonJ. E.SheldonW. M. J.PetersF. (1995). Limits to growth and respiration of bacterioplankton in the Gulf of Mexico. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.117, 259268.10.3354/meps117259

  • 50

    PoretskyR. S.GiffordS. M.Rinta-KantoJ. M.Vila-CostaM.MoranM. A. (2009). Analyzing gene expression from marine microbial communities using environmental transcriptomics. J. Vis. Exp.24: e1086.10.3791/1086

  • 51

    RedfieldA. C. (1934). “On the proportions of organic derivations in seawater and their relation to the composition of plankton,” in James Johnstone Memorial Volume, ed. Daniel (Liverpool: University Press), 177192.

  • 52

    Rinta-KantoJ. M.BürgmannH.GiffordS. M.SunS.SharmaS.del ValleD. A.KieneR. P.MoranM. A. (2010). Analysis of sulfur-related transcription by Roseobacter communities using a taxon-specific functional gene microarray. Environ. Microbiol.13, 453467.10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02350.x

  • 53

    RivkinR. B.AndersonM. R. (1997). Inorganic nutrient limitation of oceanic bacterioplankton. Limnol. Oceanogr.42, 730740.10.4319/lo.1997.42.4.0730

  • 54

    RuschD. B.HalpernA. L.SuttonG.HeidelbergK. B.WilliamsonS.YoosephS.WuD.EisenJ. A.HoffmanJ. M.RemingtonK.BeesonK.TranB.SmithH.Baden-TillsonH.StewartC.ThorpeJ.FreemanJ.Andrews-PfannkochC.VenterJ. E.LiK.KravitzS.HeidelbergJ. F.UtterbackT.RogersY. H.FalcónL. I.SouzaV.Bonilla-RossoG.EguiarteL. E.KarlD. M.SathyendranathS.PlattT.BerminghamE.GallardoV.Tamayo-CastilloG.FerrariM. R.StrausbergR. L.NealsonK.FriedmanR.FrazierM.VenterJ. C. (2007). The Sorcerer II Global Ocean Sampling expedition: Northwest Atlantic through Eastern Tropical Pacific. PLoS Biol.5, 77.10.1371/journal.pbio.0050077

  • 55

    SaeedA. I.BhagabatiN. K.BraistedJ. C.LiangW.SharovV.HoweE. A.LiJ.ThiagarajanM.WhiteJ. A.QuackenbushJ. (2006). TM4 microarray software suite. Meth. Enzymol.411, 134193.10.1016/S0076-6879(06)11009-5

  • 56

    ScottJ. T.CotnerJ. B.LaParaT. M. (2012). Variable stoichiometry and homeostatic regulation of bacterial biomass elemental composition. Front. Microbiol.3:42.10.3389/fmicb.2012.00042

  • 57

    SebastianM.AmmermanJ. W. (2011). Role of the phosphatase PhoX in the phosphorus metabolism of the marine bacterium Ruegeria pomeroyi DSS-3. Environ. Microbiol. Rep.3, 535542.10.1111/j.1758-2229.2011.00253.x

  • 58

    SolorzanoL. (1969). Determination of ammonia in natural waters by the phenolhypochlorite method. Limnol. Oceanogr.14, 799801.10.4319/lo.1969.14.5.0799

  • 59

    SternerR. W.AndersenT.ElserJ. J.HessenD. O.HoodJ. M.McCauleyE.UrabeJ. (2008). Scale-dependent carbon: nitrogen: phosphorus seston stoichiometry in marine and freshwaters. Limnol. Oceanogr.53, 11691180.10.4319/lo.2008.53.3.1169

  • 60

    StricklandJ. D. H.ParsonsT. R. (1972). A Practical Handbook of Seawater Analysis, 2nd Edn.Ottawa: Fish Res Board Can.

  • 61

    TezukaY. (1990). Bacterial regeneration of ammonium and phosphate as affected by the carbon:nitrogen:phosphorus ratio of organic substrates. Microb. Ecol.19, 227238.10.1007/BF02017167

  • 62

    ThingstadT. F. (1987). Utilization of N, P, and organic C by heterotrophic bacteria. 1. Outline of a chemostat theory with a consistent concept of maintenance metabolism. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.35, 99109.10.3354/meps035099

  • 63

    ThingstadT. F.BellerbyR. G.BratbakG.BørsheimK. Y.EggeJ. K.HeldalM.LarsenA.NeillC.NejstgaardJ.NorlandS.SandaaR.-A.SkjoldalE. F.TanakaT.ThyrhaugR.TöpperB. (2008). Counterintuitive carbon-to-nutrient coupling in an Arctic pelagic ecosystem. Nature455, 387390.10.1038/nature07235

  • 64

    ThingstadT. F.KromM. D.MantouraR. F.FlatenG. A.GroomS.HerutB.KressN.LawC. S.PasternakA.PittaP.PsarraS.RassoulzadeganF.TanakaT.TselepidesA.WassmannP.WoodwardE. M. S.Wexels RiserC.ZodiatisG.ZoharyT. (2005). Nature of phosphorus limitation in the ultraoligotrophic eastern Mediterranean. Science309, 10681071.10.1126/science.1112632

  • 65

    TorrétonJ. P.TalbotV.GarciaN. (2000). Nutrient stimulation of bacterioplankton growth in Tuamotu atoll lagoons. Aquat. Microb. Ecol.21, 125137.10.3354/ame021125

  • 66

    TusherV. G.TibshiraniR.ChuG. (2001). Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.98, 51165121.10.1073/pnas.091062498

  • 67

    Van MooyB. A.FredricksH. F.PedlerB. E.DyhrmanS. T.KarlD. M.KoblizekM.LomasM. W.MincerT. J.MooreL. R.MoutinT.RappéM. S.WebbE. A. (2009). Phytoplankton in the ocean use non-phosphorus lipids in response to phosphorus scarcity. Nature458, 6972.10.1038/nature07659

  • 68

    Van WambekeF.ChristakiU.GiannakourouA.MoutinT.SouvemerzoglouK. (2002). Longitudinal and vertical trends of bacterial limitation by phosphorus and carbon in the Mediterranean Sea. Microb. Ecol.43, 119133.10.1007/s00248-001-0038-4

  • 69

    VredeK.HeldalM.NorlandS.BratbakG. (2002). Elemental composition (C, N, P) and cell volume of exponentially growing and nutrient-limited bacterioplankton. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.68, 29652971.10.1128/AEM.68.6.2965-2971.2002

  • 70

    VrljicM.GargJ.BellmannA.WachiS.FreudlR.MaleckiM. J.SahmH.KozinaV. J.EggelingL.SaierM. H.Jr.EggelingL.SaierM. H.Jr. (1999). The LysE superfamily: topology of the lysine exporter LysE of Corynebacterium glutamicum, a paradigm for a novel superfamily of transmembrane solute translocators. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol.1, 327336.

  • 71

    WachiM.DoiM.OkadaY.MatsuhashiM. (1989). New mre genes mreC and mreD, responsible for formation of the rod shape of Escherichia coli cells. J. Bacteriol.171, 65116516.

  • 72

    WalterB.HänsslerE.KalinowskiJ.BurkovskiA. (2007). Nitrogen metabolism and nitrogen control in corynebacteria: variations of a common theme. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol.12, 131138.10.1159/000096468

  • 73

    WeberT. S.DeutschC. (2010). Ocean nutrient ratios governed by plankton biogeography. Nature467, 550554.10.1038/nature09403

  • 74

    WeissenmayerB.GaoJ. L.López-LaraI. M.GeigerO. (2002). Identification of a gene required for the biosynthesis of ornithine-derived lipids. Mol. Microbiol.45, 721733.10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03043.x

  • 75

    WhitmanW. B.ColemanD. C.WiebeW. J. (1998). Prokaryotes: the unseen majority. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.95, 65786583.10.1073/pnas.95.12.6578

  • 76

    YoosephS.SuttonG.RuschD. B.HalpernA. L.WilliamsonS. J.RemingtonK.EisenJ. A.HeidelbergK. B.ManningG.LiW.JaroszewskiL.CieplakP.MillerC. S.LiH.MashiyamaS. T.JoachimiakM. P.van BelleC.ChandoniaJ. M.SoergelD. A.ZhaiY.NatarajanK.LeeS.RaphaelB. J.BafnaV.FriedmanR.BrennerS. E.GodzikA.EisenbergD.DixonJ. E.TaylorS. S.StrausbergR. L.FrazierM.VenterJ. C. (2007). The Sorcerer II Global Ocean Sampling expedition: expanding the universe of protein families. PLoS Biol.5, e16.10.1371/journal.pbio.0050016

  • 77

    YuanZ. C.ZaheerR.FinanT. M. (2006). Regulation and properties of PstSCAB, a high-affinity, high-velocity phosphate transport system of Sinorhizobium meliloti. J. Bacteriol.188, 10891102.10.1128/JB.188.3.1089-1102.2006

  • 78

    YurkovV. V. (2006). “Aerobic phototrophic proteobacteria,” in The Prokaryotes, 3rd Edn, eds DworkinM.FalkowS.RosenbergE.SchleiferK.-H.StachebrandtE. (Singapore: Springer Science and Business Media, LLC), 562584.

  • 79

    ZimmerD. P.SoupeneE.LeeH. L.WendischV. F.KhodurskyA. B.PeterB. J.BenderR. A.KustuS. (2000). Nitrogen regulatory protein C-controlled genes of Escherichia coli: scavenging as a defense against nitrogen limitation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.97, 1467414679.10.1073/pnas.97.26.14674

  • 80

    ZoharyT.RobartsR. D. (1998). Experimental study of microbial P limitation in the eastern Mediterranean. Limnol. Oceanogr.43, 387395.10.4319/lo.1998.43.2.0175

Summary

Keywords

elemental stoichiometry, element limitation, microarray, chemostat, Ruegeria pomeroyi DSS-3

Citation

Chan L-K, Newton RJ, Sharma S, Smith CB, Rayapati P, Limardo AJ, Meile C and Moran MA (2012) Transcriptional Changes Underlying Elemental Stoichiometry Shifts in a Marine Heterotrophic Bacterium. Front. Microbio. 3:159. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00159

Received

31 December 2011

Accepted

09 April 2012

Published

16 May 2012

Volume

3 - 2012

Edited by

James Cotner, University of Minnesota, USA

Reviewed by

Katherine McMahon, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA; Edward Hall, United States Geological Survey, USA

Copyright

*Correspondence: Mary Ann Moran, Department of Marine Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-3636, USA. e-mail:

†Present address: Leong-Keat Chan, DOE Joint Genome Institute, 2800 Mitchell Drive, Walnut Creek, CA, USA; Pratibha Rayapati, Georgia Health Sciences University, Augusta, GA, USA.

Leong-Keat Chan and Ryan J. Newton have contributed equally to this work.

This article was submitted to Frontiers in Aquatic Microbiology, a specialty of Frontiers in Microbiology.

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics