ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol., 12 September 2018

Sec. Food Microbiology

Volume 9 - 2018 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02167

Phylogenetic Relatedness Among Plasmids Harbored by Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli Isolated From Retail Meats

  • Department of Biological Science, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, United States

Article metrics

View details

32

Citations

8,1k

Views

2,4k

Downloads

Abstract

Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli are two of the major causes of foodborne illness. In this study, 29 plasmids isolated from 20 retail meat isolates of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli were fully-sequenced individually or as a part of a whole genome sequencing approach. The fully-sequenced plasmids ranged in size from 3 to 119 kb. Molecular characterization of the sequenced plasmids was based on pangenomic analysis and types of genes present on these plasmids and similar ones from GenBank. The plasmids were categorized into four different groups. These groups include type-1 that consisted mainly of pTet plasmids with the tetO gene, type-2 plasmids commonly found in C. coli strains, type-3 which has pVir plasmids, and type-4 that consisted mainly of smaller plasmids. The type-2 plasmids were unique, common among C. coli strains, and carried several conjugative transfer genes. The type-2 plasmids were most similar to a plasmid from Helicobacter pullorum. Maximum parsimony analysis and NeighborNet analysis were used to assess the phylogenetic relatedness among the 29 plasmid sequences presented in this study in addition to the other 104 plasmid sequences of Campylobacter species available in GenBank to date. Results from MP analysis revealed multiple lineages among Campylobacter plasmids which was supported by NeighborNet analysis. Clustering of plasmids did not conform to species-specific clades which suggested an intra-species dissemination of plasmids among Campylobacter species. To our knowledge, this is the first extensive phylogenetic analysis of Campylobacter plasmids sequenced to date.

Introduction

Foodborne bacterial illness caused by Campylobacter spp. in the United States ranks third after Salmonella spp. and Clostridium perfringens (Scallan et al., 2011). Most of the foodborne illnesses associated with Campylobacter spp. have been related to Campylobacter jejuni; whereas, the remaining have been attributed to Campylobacter coli (Acheson and Allos, 2001; Gillespie et al., 2002). Species from genus Campylobacter are known to have gained various types of antibiotic resistance, mostly tetracycline and aminoglycosides, followed by chloramphenicol (Taylor, 1986; Tenover et al., 1992). The majority of antibiotic resistance in bacteria is associated with plasmids. While several studies on plasmids of other foodborne pathogens like Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp. are available (Williams et al., 2013), only a few reports focused on plasmids of C. jejuni and C. coli. Various types of plasmids and their incompatibility groups were reported in other foodborne pathogens, but little is known about Campylobacter plasmids. The replicon typing and the RFLP analysis of the reference collection of ECOR, SARA, SARB and SARC (E. coli and Salmonella) plasmids showed unique RFLP patterns indicating variation among the plasmids of size greater than 30 kb (Williams et al., 2013). The IncX group of plasmids, which encode Type IV fimbriae in the Enterobactericeae, has also been expanded to four subtypes according to comparisons based on phylogenetic analysis (Johnson et al., 2012). Of the few plasmids studied in C. jejuni a majority (53%) had the tetracycline resistance gene, tetO (Schmidt-Ott et al., 2005). Approximately 29% of C. jejuni isolates obtained from bloody diarrhea samples contained plasmids that conferred tetracycline resistance (pTet) as well as virulence (pVir) plasmids (Schmidt-Ott et al., 2005). Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technology has led to the characterization of a number of megaplasmids (up to 180.5 kb) of C. jejuni and C. coli isolated from various sources and bearing a spectrum of interesting genes such as the type VI secretion system(Gunther et al., 2016; Marasini, 2016; Marasini and Fakhr, 2016a,b,c, 2017a,b,c).

The tetO gene present in the most frequently encountered pTet plasmids was likely acting to maintain Campylobacter plasticity (Friis et al., 2007). Nucleotide sequence comparison of two tetracycline resistant plasmids of 45.2 and 44.7 kb in size showed the presence of the tetO gene, methylase and various homologous hypothetical genes present in both plasmids (Friis et al., 2007). These plasmids also contained various replication-associated and conjugation-associated genes that showed homology with a plasmid from Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans (Batchelor et al., 2004). The tetracycline resistance gene tetO present in the C. jejuni plasmid of 45 kb in size showed a significant similarity to the tetM tetracycline resistance gene of Streptococcus spp., indicating the possible interchange of genetic information between these bacteria (Taylor, 1986). In most of the studies, tetO has been found to be located on plasmids; whereas, in other studies it was chromosomally located in both C. jejuni and C. coli (Pratt and Korolik, 2005; Marasini and Fakhr, 2016a,b,c, 2017a,b,c). The tetO determinant was found in the chromosome as a part of a transposon gene cassette in isolates of C. coli derived from turkey and swine (Pratt and Korolik, 2005). Some of the pTet plasmids are also known to contain the aminoglycoside phosphotransferase gene aphA-3 and aphA-7 kanamycin resistant determinants (Tenover et al., 1992; Crespo et al., 2016; Marasini and Fakhr, 2016b). Studies of C. jejuni and C. coli showed that the aphA-7 gene was also present in the smaller plasmids of 11.5 and 9.2 kb in size (Tenover et al., 1992). The C. jejuni strain 81-176 was found to contain a pVir plasmid encoding genes homologous to type IV secretion system found in Helicobacter pylori (Bacon et al., 2000). This pVir plasmid was thought to be associated with bloody diarrhea but the connection could not be confirmed (Louwen et al., 2006).

Besides these two major types of plasmids (pTet and pVir), various other cryptic plasmids have been identified and fully sequenced (Jesse et al., 2006; Miller et al., 2007). The plasmid pTIW96 from a wild bird isolate of C. jejuni was 3,860 bp in size with 5 ORFs. Two of the ORFs of this plasmid were similar to pCC2228-2 (Hiett et al., 2013) found in another C. coli plasmid. Sequence analysis of the two cryptic plasmids of an agricultural isolate of C. coli showed one of the plasmids contained an ORF with homology to a plasmid from C. upsaliensis (Jesse et al., 2006). To date, 127 Campylobacter plasmids have been completely sequenced and deposited in GenBank. Most of these are small plasmids that were isolated from clinical sources. The current study aimed to determine the DNA sequences and provide a molecular characterization of numerous plasmids from C. jejuni and C. coli strains isolated from retail meat sources. Phylogenetic relatedness among 29 different Campylobacter plasmids, ranging from 3 to 119 kb, and those available in the GenBank were also investigated to identify possible plasmid lineages and origins.

Materials and methods

Campylobacter strains used for plasmid isolation

A total of 29 plasmids from Campylobacter jejuni (19) and Campylobacter coli (10) were characterized (Table 1). However, 23 of these plasmid sequences were previously announced as part of whole genome sequences of Campylobacter strains (Marasini and Fakhr, 2016a,b,c, 2017a,b,c), and the remaining 6 plasmids were fully sequenced in this study and deposited in GenBank (Table 1). These plasmids were harbored by 20 Campylobacter isolates previously isolated from various retail meat samples in Tulsa Oklahoma (Noormohamed and Fakhr, 2012, 2013, 2014). The selection of the bacterial isolates for this plasmid study was based on the restriction pattern analysis and PFGE screening of megaplasmids detected in a previous study (Marasini and Fakhr, 2014).

Table 1

Name of the plasmidSpecies/StrainsSourceSize bpNo. of contigs./ N50 valueCoverages (Average)G+CORFAccession no.
pCCDM219S*C. coli VS1219Chicken3,002148280.8331.72MH634991
pCCDM18S*C. coli P118Chicken3,30413,838.1031.44MH634988
pCCDM223S*C. coli YV1223Pork4,118111,311.46284MH63499
pCCDM18S1*C. coli P118Chicken4,37415,080.9630.86MH634989
pCCDM116SC. coli MG1116Chicken liver24,87413,005.9529.431CP017870
pCCDM33C. coli WA333Chicken liver25,05811,129.3229.330CP017874
pCCDM105SC. coli YF2105Chicken liver25,2841448.2229.231CP017867
pCCDM108SC. coli BG2108Chicken liver25,2861618.0429.231CP017880
pCCDM140S*C. coli XK3140Chicken liver26,8121214.6729.332MH634990
pCCDM18M*C. coli P118Chicken26,8241188.0429.833MH634987
pCCDM224SC. coli ZVI224Pork32,2701166.929.240CP017877
pccdm1C. coli HC248Beef liver44,0641917.8228.849CP013035
pccdm3C. coli CO2160Beef liver44,2281343.9127.847CP013033
pccdm2C. coli CE275Beef liver44,2331467.7627.947CP013037
pCCDM116LC. coli MG1116Chicken liver45,63314,269.272953CP017869
pCCDM108LC. coli BG2108Chicken liver46,18611,272.9228.955CP017879
pCCDM105LC. coli YF2105Chicken liver46,1931676.6328.956CP017866
pCCDM183C. coli BP3183Chicken liver55,1221168.9031.666CP017872
pCCDM224LC. coli ZVI224Pork55,2341382.8628.362CP017876
pCJDM210SC. jejuni YQ2210Turkey5,17016,305.6632.37CP017858
pCJDM100C. jejuni IF1100Chicken liver5,20915,946.2728.76CP017864
pCJDM204SC. jejuni ZP3204Chicken gizzard5,25719,982.7232.19CP017855
pCJDM67SC. jejuni OD267Chicken liver36,6021754.1126.149CP014746
pCJDM218C. jejuni TS1218Chicken43,0771517.562948CP017861
pCJDM204LC. jejuni ZP3204Chicken gizzard44,4361276.122849CP017854
pCJDM210LC. jejuni YQ2210Turkey44,80813662850CP017857
pcjDMC. jejuni T121Chicken82,7321486.0829.8113CP013117
pCJDM67LC. jejuni OD267Chicken liver116,8835 (N50 = 26245bp)20026.9125CP014745
pCJDM202 LC. jejuni WP2202Chicken gizzard119,5435 (N50 = 26237bp)27527.2136CP014743

Details of the plasmids used in this study which were isolated and sequenced in our laboratory.

*

Plasmids sequenced in this study.

Plasmid isolation and sequencing

Whole genomic DNA and plasmid isolation from Campylobacter strains, sequencing in Illumina Miseq platform and sequence assembly process in CLC workbench version 7.5.1 have been described previously (Marasini and Fakhr, 2016a,b,c, 2017a,b,c). Briefly, whole genome DNA isolation was carried out according to manufacturer's protocol with DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Qiagen Inc, Valencia, CA, United States) from cells grown micro-aerobically for 72 h in Mueller Hinton (MH) broth with 5% blood at 42°C. The Qiagen plasmid midi kit (Qiagen Inc, Valencia, CA, United States) was used for plasmid isolation according to manufacturer's protocol. DNA quantification was done with a Qubit 2.0 fluorimeter using high sensitivity ds DNA assay kit (Life Technologies, CA, United States) and library preparation for sequencing was completed using a Nextera XT sample preparation kit (Illumina Inc, CA, United States) as per manufacturer's instructions. Sequencing was done on Illumina MiSeq platform using Illumina MiSeq V2 reagent kit 2 × 150 cycles (Illumina Inc, CA, United States). Sequence assembly was performed using CLC Genomics Workbench version 7.5.1. Plasmid sequences with several contigs were joined and made into a single contig using contig vs. contig alignment. Joints for the contigs were confirmed by PCR and Sanger sequencing.

Plasmid sequences have been deposited in Genbank (Table 1), and announced briefly as part of whole genome sequences (Marasini and Fakhr, 2016a,b,c, 2017a,b,c). Details of all plasmids isolated from our laboratory including their Genbank accession number, number of contigs, N50 and coverages are listed in Table 1. All plasmid sequences submitted to GenBank were annotated by the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline. The RAST online tool (http://rast.nmpdr.org/rast.cgi) (Overbeek et al., 2014) was used to annotate all plasmids evaluated in this study. Circular plasmid renderings were constructed in CLC Genomics Workbench version 7.5.1.

Phylogenetic and genomic analysis

Pangenomic analysis of all plasmids from our laboratory was used to group plasmids in this study according to presence of different genes. Core genome and pangenome analysis for each group of plasmids from our laboratory including similar plasmids from GenBank was carried out using the GView server (https://server.gview.ca/). In addition to our 29 plasmid sequences, all available plasmid sequences of Campylobacter species were included to study the phylogenetic relatedness and possible transmission and origin of lineages of these plasmids. A total of 134 plasmid sequences of Campylobacter species (03/28/2018) from GenBank including one plasmid sequence of Helicobacter pullorum (plasmid 229336_12) were aligned. In GView server, blast analysis (nucleotide) was carried out using GenBank files of plasmid sequences with e-value (<1e-10), alignment length cutoff value (100) and percent identity cutoff value (80). For phylogenetic analysis, sequence alignment was done using the online version of MAFFT version 7 (https://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/) (Kuraku et al., 2013). Because the resulting alignment exhibited regions of non-overlap for various plasmids, a Maximum Parsimony (MP), character-based approach to phylogenetic analysis was used (i.e., neither distance-matrix methods nor nucleotide substitution models can be applied when extensive non-overlap exists). PAUP (Swofford, 2002) and MEGA 6 (Tamura et al., 2013) were used for phylogenetic construction by MP. Relative branch support was assessed using the bootstrap from 1,000 replicates. For comparison and validation of phylogenetic relatedness of plasmids inferred from MP tree, we also performed NeighborNet analysis with SplitsTree4 (Huson and Bryant, 2006).

Results

Molecular charcterization of the sequenced plasmids

A total of 29 plasmids were fully sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq desktop sequencer. A total of 19 plasmids from Campylobacter coli and 10 plasmids from C. jejuni were sequenced. The sizes of circular plasmids ranged from 3,002 to 119,543 bp. Based on pangenomic analysis and types of genes present, we categorized plasmids into four different groups (Figure 1). These groups include (1) type-1 plasmids (pTet plasmids) with tetO gene, (2) type-2 plasmids commonly found in C. coli strains, (3) type-3 plasmids (pVir plasmids) and (4) type-4 plasmids (plasmids < 6000 bp). All plasmids from our study are listed in Table 1 and similar plasmids found in GenBank for each group after blast analysis are listed in Table 2.

Figure 1

Figure 1

Different types of plasmids identified in our study. Circular Figure represents the pangenome analysis for all plasmid sequences from our laboratory. Individual slot (circle) in the figure represent one plasmid sequence. Pangenome analysis for all plasmid sequences was completed with GView server.

Table 2

Name of plasmidSpecies/StrainsSource of isolationSize (bp)Accession numberType of plasmid
pccdm1 *C. coli HC2-48Beef liver44,064CP0130351
Pccdm3 *C. coli CO2-160Beef liver44,228CP0130331
Pccdm2 *C. coli CF2-75Beef liver44,233CP0130371
pCC31C. coli–44,707AY3945601
pFB1TETC. coli FB1Human feces44,826CP0110171
pCCDM116L *C. coli MG1-116Chicken liver45,633CP0178691
pCCDM108L*C. coli BG2-108Chicken liver46,186CP0178791
pCCDM105L*C. coli YF2-105Chicken liver46,193CP0178661
pRM4661_48kbpC. coli RM4461not reported47,962CP0071821
Unnamed plasmidC. coli Tx40Food borne48,048KX6867491
pRM5611_48kbC. coli RM5611not reported48,422CP0071801
pCCDM183 *C. coli BP3-183Chicken liver 55,122CP0178721
pCFSAN032805_1C. coli CFSAN032805Chicken breast55,122CP0235461
pN29710-1C. coli CVM N29710Retail meats55,127CP0040671
pCCDM224L *C. coli ZV1- 224Pork55,234CP0178771
pCC14983A-1C. coliHouse fly180,543CP0170261
pMTVDSCj16-1C. jejuni MTVDSCj16Chicken cecal content42,686CP0174191
pCJDM218 *C. jejuni TS1-218Chicken43,077CP0178611
pTetC. jejuni S3not reported43,222CP0019611
pTetC. jejuni ICDCCJ07001Clinical44,084CP0020301
p11601MDC. jejuni 11601MDTurkey44,095KJ6460121
pCJDM204L *C. jejuni ZP3-204Chicken gizzard44,436CP0178541
pMTVDSCj13-1C. jejuni MTVDSCj13Chicken cecal content44,687CP0174181
pCJDM210L *C. jejuni YQ2-210Turkey44,808CP0178571
pMTVDSCj07-1C. jejuni MTVDSCj07Chicken cecal content44,917CP0174161
pTetC. jejuni 81-176not reported45,025CP0005491
pTetC. jejuni 81-176not reported45,025AY3945611
pRM1246_ERRCC. jejuni RM1246-ERRCHuman45,197CP0224711
pTetC. jejuni 81176not reported45,210AY7142141
pCJP002C. jejuni YH002Calf liver45,904CP0207751
pTet-M129C. jejuni M129Clinical46,448CP0077501
Unnamed plasmidC. jejuni FDAARGOS_265Clinical isolate46,746CP0220781
pTet-D42aC. jejuni D42aChicken cecum46,761CP0077521
Unnamed plasmidC. jejuni 00-2544Human feces46,902CP0067101
pCj1C. jejuni 01-1512Human48,872CP0100731
pCJ14980AC. jejuni 14980ATurkey feces50,689CP0170301
pFORC46.1C. jejuni FORC_046Human feces51,522CP0172301
pCFSAN032806C. jejuni CFSAN032806Chicken breast55,132CP0235441
pcjDM *C. jejuni T1-21Retail chicken82,732CP0131171
pCJDM67L *C. jejuni OD2-67Chicken liver116,883CP0147451
pCJDM202 *C. jejuni WP2-202Chicken gizzard119,543CP0147431
pCCDM116S *C. coli MG1116Chicken liver24,874CP0178702
pCFSAN032805_2C. coli CFSAN032805Chicken breast25,046CP0235472
pCCDM33S *C. coli WA333Chicken liver25,058CP0178742
pCCDM105S *C. coli YF2105Chicken liver25,284CP0178672
pCCDM108S *C. coli BG2108Chicken liver25,286CP0178802
pCC42yrC. coli 15-537360Human26,269CP0067032
pCCDM140S *C. coli XK3140Chicken liver26,812MH6349902
pCCDM18M *C. coli P118Chicken26,824MH6349872
pOR12CC42C. coli OR12Organic chicken farm27,987CP0137362
pCC42C. coli FB1Human feces29,115CP0110162
pCCDM224S *C. coli ZV1224Pork32,270CP0178762
pRM1875_35kbC. coli RM1875not reported35,364CP0071843
pOR12virC. coli OR12Organic chicken farm37,395CP0137343
pCJDM67S *C. jejuni OD2-67Chicken liver36,602CP0147463
pCj2C. jejuni 01-1512Human36,604CP0100743
pVirC. jejuni IA3902Sheep37,174CP0018773
pVirC. jejuni 81-176not reported37,468AF2262803
pVirC. jejuni 81-176not reported37,473CP0005503
pCCDM219S *C. coli VS1-219Chicken3,002MH6349914
pCC14983A-3C. coli 14983AHousefly3,142CP0170284
pCC2228-2C. coli RM2228not reported3,303DQ5181714
pCCDM18S *C. coli P118Chicken3,304MH6349884
P3384C. colinot reported3,316AY9481164
pRM1875_3.3kbC. coli RM1875not reported3,324CP0071864
pCCT1C. colinot reported3,327X820794
pCCT2C. colinot reported3,344X820804
pRM1875_3.4kbpC. coli RM1875not reported3,347CP0071874
pCCDM223S *C. coli YV1-223Pork4,118MH6349924
pCCDM18S1 *C. coli P118Chicken4,374MH6349894
pCJ01C. jejuninot reported3,212AF3011644
pTIW94C. jejuni S4-2Wild bird feces3,860KF1928424
pCJ419C. jejuninot reported4,013AY2568464
pCJDM210S *C. jejuni YQ2210Turkey5,170CP0178584
pCJDM100 *C. jejuni IF1-100Chicken liver5,209CP0178644
pCJDM204S *C. jejuni ZP3-204Chicken gizzard5,257CP0178554

List of all plasmids found in C. jejuni and C. coli strains from our laboratory and GenBank used for core genome and pangenome analysis.

The pCCDM105L, pCCDM18M, pCJDM67S, and pCJDM204S sequences were used as reference for blast analysis for type 1, type 2, type 3 and type 4 plasmids respectively. Type 1, type 2, type 3, and type 4 plasmids are highlighted in gray, blue, green, and red respectively.

*

plasmids isolated and sequenced in our laboratory.

Type-1: pTet plasmids

The most prevalent plasmid type in C. jejuni and C. coli strains was Type 1 (pTet). Of the 29 plasmids that were isolated and sequenced, 14 were pTet plasmids (Figure 1, Table 2). Plasmid pCCDM105L served as as an examplar for all pTet plasmids and also was used as reference for core genome and pangeome analysis (Figures 2A–D). Core genome analysis among pTet plasmids isolated from our laboratory showed various genes including genes for the Type IV secretion system (virB2, virB4, virB5, virB6, virB7, virB8, virB9, virB10, and virB11 genes) as core genome (Table 3, Figure 2D, Supplementary Table 1). The core genome among pTet plasmids from our laboratory is summarized in Table 3. However, only the gene for TetO was found as core genome for all pTet plasmids of C. jejuni and C. coli from Genbank (including our 14 pTet plasmids) (Figure 2C, Supplementary Table 2). Pangenome analysis showed that most pTet plasmids share similar genomic composition and size, however, a few were determined to be megaplasmid due to the presence of extra DNA length that included some genes (Figure 2B, Supplementary Table 3). Extra Mu-like prophage genes are found to be inserted in the pcjDM plasmid (Marasini and Fakhr, 2016c), whereas, pCJDM67L, pCJDM202 (Marasini and Fakhr, 2016a) and pCC14983A-1 (from Genbank) harbor extra genes including several associated with the Type VI secretion system.

Figure 2

Figure 2

(A) Circular map of pTet (type-1) plasmid (pCCDM105L) showing the presence of various genes, (B) pangenome of pTet plasmids avialable in Genbank (incuding all pTet plasmids from our laboratory), (C) core genome for all pTet plasmids (red arrows in the outer circle indicate the core genome of all plasmid sequences used in the study), and (D) core genome among pTet plasmids isolated and sequenced from our laboratory.

Table 3

Core genome encoding the following proteins*Function
TetOTetracycline resistance protein
Helicase, snf2 familyhelicase, Snf2 family
TraRIncQ plasmid conjugative transfer DNA nicking endonuclease (pTi VirD2 homolog)
Ribbon-helix-helix proteinRibbon-helix-helix protein, copG family domain protein
DNA primaseDNA primase (EC 2.7.7.-)
TraGIncQ plasmid conjugative transfer protein TraG
Site-specific recombinase, resolvase familySite-specific recombinase, resolvase family
Virulence-associated protein 2Virulence-associated protein 2
VirB2Major pilus subunit of type IV secretion complex
VirB4ATPase provides energy for both assembly of type IV secretion complex and secretion of T-DNA complex
Phage Rha proteinPhage Rha protein
Single-stranded DNA-binding proteinSingle-stranded DNA-binding protein
VirB5Minor pilin of type IV secretion complex
VirB6Inner membrane protein of type IV secretion of T-DNA complex, VirB6
VirB7Lipoprotein of type IV secretion complex that spans outer membrane and periplasm
VirB8Inner membrane protein forms channel for type IV secretion of T-DNA complex
VirB9Outer membrane and periplasm component of type IV secretion of T-DNA complex, has secretin-like domain
VirB10Inner membrane protein forms channel for type IV secretion of T-DNA complex
VirB11ATPase required for both assembly of type IV secretion complex and secretion of T-DNA complex
VirD4Coupling protein, ATPase required for T-DNA transfer
cag12cag pathogenicity island protein
TraQIncQ plasmid conjugative transfer protein (RP4 TrbM homolog)

The common genes (with identified functions only) present in all of type-1 (pTet) plasmids from our laboratory isolates (details and percentage identity in Supplementary Table 1).

*

Only genes with identified functions are included, all hypothetical proteins are excluded in the list of core genome.

Few genes responsible for virulence and antibiotic resistance were found in different plasmids (Supplementary Table 3). A gene encoding virulence-associated protein 2 (VapD) was found in all pTet plasmids from our laboratory. The protein kinase gene was present in pccdm2, pccdm3, pCJDM210L and pCJDM204L. An aminoglycoside phosphotransferase gene was present in pccdm1, pCJDM, pCCDM183, and pCCDM224L. Histidine kinase and DNA-cytosine methyltransferase were present only in pCCDM224L. Kanamycin kinase, uridine phosphorylase, spectinomycin adenyl transferase, hygromycin B-phosphorylase, pyrrolidone–carboxylase peptidase, aminoglycoside adenyltransferase and streptothiricin acetyl transferase were present in pCCDM183 (Marasini and Fakhr, 2017c). The pCJDM plasmid harbors most of the multidrug resistance genes that are also present in pCCDM183 except uridine phosphorylase and spectinomycin adenyl transferase (Marasini and Fakhr, 2016c). All genes present in pTet plasmids and percentage similarity to other plasmids are listed in Supplementary Table 3.

Type-2: campylobacter coli specific plasmids

The type-2 plasmids are -the second-most prevalent group from our study (Figure 1, Table 2). These plasmids were found only in C. coli strains and were not found in any of the C. jejuni strains screened in our study. Type-2 plasmids range from 24 to 32 kb in size. Type-2 plasmids from our laboratory and similar plasmid sequences from GenBank are listed in Table 2. The plasmid sequence for pCCDM18M was used as reference for Blast, core genome and pangenomic analyses (Figures 3A–C, Supplementary Tables 4, 5). Results from core genome analysis among type-2 plasmids and similar plasmids from GenBank are presented in Table 4 (Figure 3B). A number of trb genes responsible for conjugative transfer were identified in these plasmids. A larger percentage of genes were conserved among the type 2 plasmids as compared to the pTet plasmids. In addition to these transfer genes, virD4, traI, gene for single-stranded DNA binding protein and traQ were common among all type-2 plasmids (Figures 3B,C, Table 4, Supplementary Tables 4, 5). Few genomic differences were found among these plasmids (Supplementary Table 5). Meanwhile, few genes related to Type IV secretion system, virB1, putative antirepresser, phage Rha proteins and mobile element protein were detected in several plasmids of this group (Supplementary Table 5).

Figure 3

Figure 3

(A) Circular map of the type-2 plasmid (pCCDM18M), (B) core genome among all type-2 plasmids used in this study (Table 2, Supplementary Table 4), and (C) pangenome for all type-2 plasmids used in this study (Supplementary Table 5).

Table 4

Core genome encoding the following proteins*Function
TraLIncP-type DNA transfer protein
VirD4Type IV secretion system protein VirD4
Single-stranded DNA-binding proteinSingle-stranded DNA-binding protein
VirB1Bores hole in peptidoglycan layer allowing type IV secretion complex assembly to occur
TrbIConjugative transfer protein TrbI
TrbGConjugative transfer protein
TrbFConjugative transfer protein
TrbLConjugative transfer protein
TrbJConjugative transfer protein
TraQIncQ plasmid conjugative transfer protein (RP4 TrbM homolog)
TrbEConjugative transfer protein
TrbDConjugative transfer protein
TrbBConjugative transfer protein
TraIIncP-type DNA relaxase
ParAChromosome (plasmid) partitioning protein
Signal peptidaseSignal peptidase I
TraMConjugal transfer protein
Cell filamentation-like proteinCell filamentation-like protein

Core genome for type-2 plasmids (including all plasmids from GenBank) presented in Table 2.

Details and percentage identity are available in Supplementary Table 4.

*

Only genes with identified functions are included, all hypothetical proteins are excluded in the list of core genome.

Type-3: pVir type of plasmid

There was only one plasmid of type-3 (pCJDM67S) among those sequenced for this project (Table 2, Figure 4A). This plasmid is similar to the pVir plasmid that was thought to be a virulence plasmid (Bacon et al., 2002). This plasmid also contains most of the hypothetical proteins observed in the pVir plasmid of Campylobacter jejuni 81-176 (Bacon et al., 2002) (Supplementary Tables 6, 7). The pCJDM67S plasmid shares ssb, genes for DNA topoisomerase, VirB10, VirB9, DNA transformation competancy protein, VirB4, TraQ, and RepE as core genome similar to other pVir plasmids (Table 5, Figures 4B,C). Details of all genes present among all pVir plasmids (pangenome) used in this study are presented in Supplementary Table 7.

Figure 4

Figure 4

(A) Circular map of the plasmid, pCJDM67S, (B) core genome of pVir plasmids (Red arrows in outer circle represent core genome), and (C) pangenome of all pVir plasmids used in study.

Table 5

Core genome encoding the following proteins*Functions
Single-stranded DNA-binding proteinSingle-stranded DNA-binding protein
TopADNA topoisomerase I (EC 5.99.1.2)
TadA/VirB11/CpaF, TadAType II/IV secretion system ATP hydrolase
VirB10Type IV secretion/competence protein
VirB9Type IV secretion/competence protein
VirB8/ DNA transformation competancyDNA transformation competancy
VirB4ATPase required for both assembly of type IV secretion complex and secretion of T-DNA complex
TraQIncQ plasmid conjugative transfer protein (RP4 TrbM homolog)
RepERepE replication protein, putative
ParAPlasmid partitioning protein

Core genome for all pVir plasmids of C. jejuni and C. coli strains used in this study (see Table 2).

*

Only genes with identified functions are included, all hypothetical proteins are excluded in the list of core genome.

Type-4: small plasmids

Seven small plasmids (<6 kb) were included in our study (Table 2, Figure 1). Except for pCJDM204S and pCJDM210S, which shared some homologous genes between them, remaining small plasmids did not share similar genetic composition. Most of these plasmids contain hypothetical protein-coding genes and replication initiater genes (Figures 5A–D). Published plasmid sequences from our laboratory and some similar plasmids from GenBank share a replication initiation protein as core genome (Figure 5D, Supplementary Table 8). However, one of these sequences, pCCDM223S, only harbors hypothetical proteins (Figure 5C, Supplementary Table 9).

Figure 5

Figure 5

Circular map of the small (<6 kb) plasmids, (A) pCJDM204S, (B) pCCDM219S, (C) pangenome for all smaller plasmids used in the study and (D) core genome for all smaller plasmids of C. jejuni and C. coli strains used in this study from GenBank.

Phylogenetic analysis

The original alignment comprised 134 plasmid sequences. Seven duplicate sequences were excluded for the final round of phylogenetic analyses. Results from the MP analysis are shown in the Figure 6. The MP tree supported a distinctive clade of pTet plasmids (type-1) and pVir plasmids (type-3) from all Campylobacter species which consisted plasmids only from C. jejuni and C. coli strains. Type-2 plasmids from C. coli strains in our study and other similar plasmids from Genbank also form a separate clade in phylogenetic tree. Although, most type-2 plasmids are from C. coli strains, two plasmids from published sequences of C. jejuni are also included in this group. A single plasmid from our laboratory (pcjdm67) is allied in a monophyletic group of type-3 plasmids (Figure 6). Five small plasmids (< 6 kb) from our study form part of a monophyletic group within a paraphyletic type-4 alliance (Figure 6). The pCCDM223S sequence forms a separate cluster with plasmid pCCON31 (from C. concisus) in the paraphyletic type-4 group (Figure 6). Numerous well-supported lineages (bootstrap values >95) are resolved by MP analysis of all plasmids from Campylobacter species. Not all plasmid sequences could be unambiguously categorized by pangenomic analysis (Figure 6). No species-specific clade was detected. Largely due to extensive regions of non-overlap between divergent plasmid sequences (i.e., missing data), relationships among pangenomic types and other major lineages are not resolved by these data. Results of the NeighborNet analysis revealed several major aggregates of plasmid sequences, all of which corresponded to robust branches on the MP tree (Supplementary Figure S1).

Figure 6

Figure 6

Maximum parsimony tree for all plasmid sequences of Campylobacter species (sequences from our laboratory are highlighted with colored circles). Categorization of plasmids from pangenomic analysis (Figure 1) are represented with shaded colors [type-1 (black), type-2 (blue), type-3 (green) and type-4 (red)] on the phylogenetic tree. Only boostrap values >70 are are mapped to the phylogenetic tree. Duplicate plasmid sequences were excluded from the analysis. The results of NeighborNet analysis for Campylobacter plasmids are illustrated in Supplementary Figure S1.

Discussion

The literature lacks much information about plasmids of C. jejuni and C. coli despite the fact that these two organisms are major causes of foodborne illness (Scallan et al., 2011). A total of 29 plasmids of different origins and from both C. jejuni and C. coli were fully sequenced for this investigation using the Illumina MiSeq technology. After complete analysis of the annotated genes by RAST (Overbeek et al., 2014), three major groups of plasmids (type 1, 2, and 3) and a few small plasmids less than 6 kb (type 4) were identified. Other foodborne pathogens, such as Salmonella spp. and E. coli, are also known to have variable plasmids as well as various types of incompatibility groups (Johnson et al., 2012; Williams et al., 2013). Thus, the diversity among plasmids from these pathogens is not unique, but confirms the assertion that plasmid diversity from even closely-related bacteria can be immense (Taylor et al., 1983; Tenover et al., 1985).

Only the gene for tetracycline resistance (tetO) is found to be in core genome among all pTet plasmids (Figure 2C). As noted previously, the tetO gene present in pTet plasmids (type-1) also shares sequence similarity with the tetM gene of Streptococcus spp., indicating the possibility of a genetic exchange between Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria (Taylor, 1986). Although the tetO gene found in pTet plasmids from Campylobacter is regarded as homologous to tetracycline resistance genes from other bacteria, the genetic composition of Campylobacter plasmids shows little similarity to plasmids of other bacteria. The presence of the tetO gene in both the chromosome and the plasmids of C. jejuni and C. coli indicates that the gene was either present in the chromosome and was later transferred with the integrated plasmids, or it might have reached the chromosome following acquisition of an integrated plasmid (Pratt and Korolik, 2005; Crespo et al., 2012). The high prevalence of pTet plasmids in Campylobacter strains from our study is similar to previous reports of clinical isolates in Germany (Schmidt-Ott et al., 2005). The presence of pTet (type-1) and pVir (type-3) in Campylobacter was also discussed in the previous investigation (Schmidt-Ott et al., 2005). We concur with Schmidt-Ott et al. (2005) that pVir plasmids are less prevalent than pTet plasmids in Campylobacter strains.

The pTet plasmids harbor important genes responsible for conjugation and virulence, exemplified by the Type IV secretion system (Bacon et al., 2000). The Type IV secretion system was reported in chromosomes of Helicobacter pylori (Fernandez-Gonzalez and Backert, 2014) and was conserved in the plasmids and various genomic islands in Campylobacter fetus (Graaf–van Bloois et al., 2016). Many hypothetical proteins of unknown function were observed in several previously-characterized plasmids (Batchelor et al., 2004) and also in plasmids sequenced for this investigation. Some of the genes responsible for conjugation are similar to genes from Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitants (Batchelor et al., 2004), which might indicate transfer of conjugative genes between nonrelated microbes. Some of the pTet plasmids (pcjDM, pCCDM183, pccdm1, and pCCDM224L) were found to possess the aminoglycoside phosphotransferase genes. These pTet plasmids are all greater than 48 kb in size except pccdm1 which is only 44 kb in size. Some plasmids (i.e., pcjDM and pCCDM183) contained multidrug resistance genes such as aminoglycoside adenyl transferase, streptothiricin- and hygromycin-resistant genes. In addition, the pCCDM183 plasmid sequence also contained genes for kanamycin kinase and spectinomycin o-adenyl transferase. The presence of aminoglycoside resistance genes in Campylobacter strains was also reported in previous studies (Tenover et al., 1992; Chen et al., 2013). Megaplasmids of more than 80 kb are present in the pTet plasmids (type-1) group (Marasini and Fakhr, 2016a,c; Miller et al., 2016). In addition to the common genes among pTet plasmids (Table 3), the megaplasmids were shown to have an inserted segment of bacteriophage genes or other types of mobile genetic components (Gunther et al., 2016; Marasini and Fakhr, 2016c). Some of these megaplasmids also contained the complete Type VI secretion system with all 14 core genes present (Marasini and Fakhr, 2016a). The fact that 14/29 plasmids sequenced in our laboratory were pTet plasmids (Table 2) is not surprising since we previously reported that tetracycline resistance was prevalent among Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli strains isolated from various retail meats (Noormohamed and Fakhr, 2012, 2013, 2014). Functional analysis of the virulence and antimicrobial resistance genes present on these plasmids is worth investigating and may shed some light on the role of these genes in conferring the corresponding phenotypes.

The type-2 plasmids, which ranged in size from 24 kb to 32 kb, were similar to few others deposited in the GenBank. This plasmid group primarily consists of plasmids from C. coli strains. However, two plasmids from C. jejuni strains are also found to be allied in this group (Figure 6). A plasmid present in Helicobacter pullorum (i.e., plasmid 229336_12) is a close ally of the type-2 plasmids (Figure 6). Most of the predicted genes in these plasmids are common to all plasmids in this group (type-2) except for a few hypothetical proteins. The core genome for type-2 plasmids included genes for conjugative transfer along with type IV secretion system genes such as virD4 and virB1(Table 4). Most of the conjugative transfer genes present in these plasmids were different from the Type IV conjugative transfer genes in other C. jejuni and C. coli plasmids (type-1 and type-3). The similarity between type-2 plasmids from C. jejuni and C. coli strains and the 229336_12 plasmid (H. pullorum) might indicate a possible route of transmission and genetic interchangeability of these plasmids between species. The pCCDM67S plasmid from our study is similar to a pVir type plasmid, previously studied by Bacon et al. (2002). The pCCDM67S plasmid also contains orthologs of the Type IV secretion system found in Helicobacter pylori (Bacon et al., 2000).

In addition to types 1-3, we characterized other small cryptic plasmids (type-4) that share similar genomic composition and arrangements with previously-characterized plasmids of diverse sources (Jesse et al., 2006; Miller et al., 2007). Most of these plasmids contain the replication initiator protein and some unknown hypothetical proteins. Some of these plasmids also contain genes coding for Mob proteins.

The phylogenetic analysis clearly shows numerous, well-resolved lineages comprised of complete sequences for all Campylobacter plasmids reported to date (Figure 6, Supplementary Figure S1). The branching pattern of the phylogenetic trees supports our categorization of Campylobacter plasmids according to pangenomic analysis for type 1, 2, and 3 plasmids. In MP tree, the most prevalent pTet plasmids (type-1) were all grouped in one lineage. Similarly, type-2 and type-3 (pVir) plasmids formed distinctive clades with similar plasmids from Genbank. Type 1 (pTet), type-2, and type-3 (pVir) plasmid groups consist of plasmid sequences from C. jejuni/C. coli strains. The small (<6 kb) plasmid sequences from C. jejuni/C. coli strains cluster with plasmids from other Campylobacter species. One plasmid cluster including plasmid mp1 (CP014569.1) consists of plasmids from mostly C. fetus and non-jejuni/coli species of Campylobacter. This cluster is found near type-2 plasmids. Since we have very little knowledge of the distribution of these Campylobacter plasmids, we used Maximum Parsimony for the analysis of the plasmid sequences. In a previous study done by (Crespo et al., 2016), similar types of phylogenetic relationships were observed where the majority of plasmids with tetO genes were allied in one cluster and some smaller plasmids were allied in another cluster. Results of NeighborNet analysis indicate that plasmids found in Campylobacter species likely have a convoluted evolutionary history (Supplementary Figure S1). Nonethless, there is a 1:1 correspondence between the network (Supplementary Figure S1) and the tree from MP analysis (Figure 6) regarding major groupings of type 1, type 2 and type 3 plasmids (Supplementary Figures S1B,D,F). The root also shows correspondence between the two analyses. A portion of the type 4 group (Figure 6) forms a loose cluster in the network analysis (Supplementary Figure S1E). The type 4 group is a non-monophyletic assemblage in the MP analysis, too. This indicates that type 4 is either the most diverse plasmid type or may be comprised of additional, unrecognized types. We can simply state that the well-resolved portions of the phylogeny provide a reasonable inference for relationships among plasmids.

Most of the isolated and sequenced plasmids are associated with isolates of C. jejuni and C. coli. This observation is consistent with the fact that most clinical cases of Campylobacter infection are associated with C. jejuni and C. coli strains (Acheson and Allos, 2001; Gillespie et al., 2002). The absence of any species-specific plasmid clades indicates intra-species dissemination of plasmids among Campylobacter species. Several divergent lineages are present in our analyses (Figure 6, Supplementary Figure S1) and these may be representatives of larger, but under-sampled plasmid lineages. Thus, the results of this study indicate that additional sampling will be needed to more fully understand the evolution and transmission of Campylobacter plasmids.

Statements

Author contributions

MF conceived the research idea and design. DM and AK performed the experimental procedures. DM, AK, and MB performed the phylogenetic analysis. DM, AK, MB, and MF prepared the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge financial support from the Research Office of The University of Tulsa (Tulsa, OK, USA) for awarding DM a student research grant.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02167/full#supplementary-material

References

  • 1

    AchesonD.AllosB. M. (2001). Campylobacter jejuni infections: update on emerging issues and trends. Clin. Infect. Dis.32, 1201–1206. 10.1086/319760

  • 2

    BaconD. J.AlmR. A.BurrD. H.HuL.KopeckoD. J.EwingC. P.et al. (2000). Involvement of a plasmid in virulence of Campylobacter jejuni 81-176. Infect. Immun.68, 4384–4390. 10.1128/IAI.68.8.4384-4390.2000

  • 3

    BaconD. J.AlmR. A.HuL.HickeyT. E.EwingC. P.BatchelorR. A.et al. (2002). DNA sequence and mutational analyses of the pVir plasmid of Campylobacter jejuni 81-176. Infect. Immun.70, 6242–6250. 10.1128/IAI.70.11.6242-6250.2002

  • 4

    BatchelorR. A.PearsonB. M.FriisL. M.GuerryP.WellsJ. M. (2004). Nucleotide sequences and comparison of two large conjugative plasmids from different Campylobacter species. Microbiology150, 3507–3517. 10.1099/mic.0.27112-0

  • 5

    ChenY.MukherjeeS.HoffmannM.KotewiczM. L.YoungS.AbbottJ.et al. (2013). Whole-genome sequencing of gentamicin-resistant Campylobacter coli isolated from U.S. retail meats reveals novel plasmid-mediated aminoglycoside resistance genes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.57, 5398–5405. 10.1128/AAC.00669-13

  • 6

    CrespoM. D.AltermannE.OlsonJ.MillerW. G.ChandrashekharK.KathariouS. (2016). Novel plasmid conferring kanamycin and tetracycline resistance in the turkey-derived Campylobacter jejuni strain 11601MD. Plasmid86, 32–37. 10.1016/j.plasmid.2016.06.001

  • 7

    CrespoM. D.OlsonJ. W.AltermannE.SiletzkyR. M.KathariouS. (2012). Chromosomal tet(O)-harboring regions in Campylobacter coli isolates from turkeys and swine. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.78, 8488–8491. 10.1128/AEM.02258-12

  • 8

    Fernandez-GonzalezE.BackertS. (2014). DNA transfer in the gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori. J. Gastroenterol.49, 594–604. 10.1007/s00535-014-0938-y

  • 9

    FriisL. M.PinC.TaylorD. E.PearsonB. M.WellsJ. M. (2007). A role for the tet(O) plasmid in maintaining Campylobacter plasticity. Plasmid57, 18–28. 10.1016/j.plasmid.2006.06.005

  • 10

    GillespieI. A.O'BrienS. J.FrostJ. A.AdakG. K.HorbyP.SwanA. V.et al. (2002). A case-case comparison of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter jejuni infection: a tool for generating hypotheses. Emerg. Infect. Dis.8, 937–942. 10.3201/eid0809.010187

  • 11

    Graaf–van BlooisL. v.MillerW. G.YeeE.GorkiewiczG.ForbesK. J.ZomerA. L.et al. (2016). Campylobacter fetus Subspecies contain conserved Type IV secretion systems on multiple genomic islands and plasmids. PLoS ONE11, e0152832. 10.1371/journal.pone.0152832

  • 12

    GuntherN. W.ReichenbergerE. R.BonoJ. L. (2016). Complete genome sequence of UV-resistant Campylobacter jejuni RM3194, including an 81.08-Kilobase plasmid. Genome Announc.4, e00305–e00316. 10.1128/genomeA.00305-16

  • 13

    HiettK. L.RothrockM. J.SealB. S. (2013). Characterization of the Campylobacter jejuni cryptic plasmid pTIW94 recovered from wild birds in the southeastern United States. Plasmid70, 268–271. 10.1016/j.plasmid.2013.04.004

  • 14

    HusonD. H.BryantD. (2006). Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23, 254–267. 10.1093/molbev/msj030

  • 15

    JesseT. W.Pittenger-AlleyL. G.EnglenM. D. (2006). Sequence analysis of two cryptic plasmids from an agricultural isolate of Campylobacter coli. Plasmid55, 64–69. 10.1016/j.plasmid.2005.06.001

  • 16

    JohnsonT. J.BielakE. M.FortiniD.HansenL. H.HasmanH.DebroyC.et al. (2012). Expansion of the IncX plasmid family for improved identification and typing of novel plasmids in drug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Plasmid68, 43–50. 10.1016/j.plasmid.2012.03.001

  • 17

    KurakuS.ZmasekC. M.NishimuraO.KatohK. (2013). aLeaves facilitates on-demand exploration of metazoan gene family trees on MAFFT sequence alignment server with enhanced interactivity. Nucleic Acids Res.41, W22–W28. 10.1093/nar/gkt389

  • 18

    LouwenR. P.van BelkumA.WagenaarJ. A.DoorduynY.AchterbergR.EndtzH. P. (2006). Lack of association between the presence of the pVir plasmid and bloody diarrhea in Campylobacter jejuni enteritis. J. Clin. Microbiol.44, 1867–1868. 10.1128/JCM.44.5.1867-1868.2006

  • 19

    MarasiniD. (2016). Molecular characterization of megaplasmids in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolated from retail meats. Doctoral dissertation, Retrieved from ProQuest, The University of Tulsa (10249959).

  • 20

    MarasiniD.FakhrM. (2014). Exploring PFGE for detecting large plasmids in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolated from various retail meats. Pathogens3, 833–844. 10.3390/pathogens3040833

  • 21

    MarasiniD.FakhrM. K. (2016a). Complete genome sequences of Campylobacter jejuni strains OD267 and WP2202 isolated from retail chicken livers and gizzards reveal the presence of novel 116-kilobase and 119-kilobase megaplasmids with Type VI secretion systems. Genome Announc.4, e01060–e01016. 10.1128/genomeA.01060-16

  • 22

    MarasiniD.FakhrM. K. (2016b). Complete genome sequences of the plasmid-bearing Campylobacter coli strains HC2-48, CF2-75, and CO2-160 isolated from retail beef liver. Genome Announc.4, e01004–e01016. 10.1128/genomeA.01004-16

  • 23

    MarasiniD.FakhrM. K. (2016c). Whole-genome sequencing of a Campylobacter jejuni strain isolated from retail chicken meat reveals the presence of a megaplasmid with mu-like prophage and multidrug resistance genes. Genome Announc.4, e00460–e00416. 10.1128/genomeA.00460-16

  • 24

    MarasiniD.FakhrM. K. (2017a). Complete genome sequences of Campylobacter jejuni strains isolated from retail chicken and chicken gizzards. Genome Announc.5, e01351–e01317. 10.1128/genomeA.01351-17

  • 25

    MarasiniD.FakhrM. K. (2017b). Complete genome sequences of plasmid-bearing Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter jejuni strains isolated from retail chicken liver. Genome Announc.5, e01350–e01317. 10.1128/genomeA.01350-17

  • 26

    MarasiniD.FakhrM. K. (2017c). Complete genome sequences of plasmid-bearing multidrug-resistant Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli strains with type VI secretion systems, isolated from retail turkey and pork. Genome Announc. 5. e01360–e01317. 10.1128/genomeA.01360-17

  • 27

    MillerW. G.HeathS.MandrellR. E. (2007). Cryptic plasmids isolated from Campylobacter strains represent multiple, novel incompatibility groups. Plasmid57, 108–117. 10.1016/j.plasmid.2006.08.005

  • 28

    MillerW. G.HuynhS.ParkerC. T.NiedermeyerJ. A.KathariouS. (2016). Complete genome sequences of multidrug-resistant Campylobacter jejuni strain 14980A (turkey feces) and Campylobacter coli strain 14983A (housefly from a turkey farm), harboring a novel gentamicin resistance mobile element. Genome Announc.4, e01175–e01116. 10.1128/genomeA.01175-16

  • 29

    NoormohamedA.FakhrM. K. (2012). Incidence and antimicrobial resistance profiling of Campylobacter in retail chicken livers and gizzards. Foodborne Pathog. Dis.9, 617–624. 10.1089/fpd.2011.1074

  • 30

    NoormohamedA.FakhrM. K. (2013). A higher prevalence rate of Campylobacter in retail beef livers compared to other beef and pork meat cuts. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health10, 2058–2068. 10.3390/ijerph10052058

  • 31

    NoormohamedA.FakhrM. K. (2014). Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Campylobacter spp. in Oklahoma conventional and organic retail poultry. Open Microbiol. J.8, 130–137. 10.2174/1874285801408010130

  • 32

    OverbeekR.OlsonR.PuschG. D.OlsenG. J.DavisJ. J.DiszT.et al. (2014). The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res.42, D206–D214. 10.1093/nar/gkt1226

  • 33

    PrattA.KorolikV. (2005). Tetracycline resistance of Australian Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolates. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.55, 452–460. 10.1093/jac/dki040

  • 34

    ScallanE.HoekstraR. M.AnguloF. J.TauxeR. V.WiddowsonM. A.RoyS. L.et al. (2011). Foodborne illness acquired in the United States–major pathogens. Emerg. Infect. Dis.17, 7–15. 10.3201/eid1701.P11101

  • 35

    Schmidt-OttR.PohlS.BurghardS.WeigM.GrossU. (2005). Identification and characterization of a major subgroup of conjugative Campylobacter jejuni plasmids. J. Infect.50, 12–21. 10.1016/j.jinf.2004.02.013

  • 36

    SwoffordD. L. (2002). Phylogenetic analysisusing parsimony. Options42, 294–307.

  • 37

    TamuraK.StecherG.PetersonD.FilipskiA.KumarS. (2013). MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol.30, 2725–2729. 10.1093/molbev/mst197

  • 38

    TaylorD. E. (1986). Plasmid-mediated tetracycline resistance in Campylobacter jejuni: expression in Escherichia coli and identification of homology with streptococcal class M determinant. J. Bacteriol.165, 1037–1039. 10.1128/jb.165.3.1037-1039.1986

  • 39

    TaylorD. E.GarnerR. S.AllanB. J. (1983). Characterization of tetracycline resistance plasmids from Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.24, 930–935. 10.1128/AAC.24.6.930

  • 40

    TenoverF. C.FennellC. L.LeeL.LeBlancD. J. (1992). Characterization of two plasmids from Campylobacter jejuni isolates that carry the aphA-7 kanamycin resistance determinant. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.36, 712–716. 10.1128/AAC.36.4.712

  • 41

    TenoverF. C.WilliamsS.GordonK. P.NolanC.PlordeJ. J. (1985). Survey of plasmids and resistance factors in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.27, 37–41. 10.1128/AAC.27.1.37

  • 42

    WilliamsL. E.WiremanJ.HilliardV. C.SummersA. O. (2013). Large plasmids of Escherichia coli and Salmonella encode highly diverse arrays of accessory genes on common replicon families. Plasmid69, 36–48. 10.1016/j.plasmid.2012.08.002

Summary

Keywords

Campylobacter, plasmids, phylogenetic relatedness, retail meats, next generation sequencing

Citation

Marasini D, Karki AB, Buchheim MA and Fakhr MK (2018) Phylogenetic Relatedness Among Plasmids Harbored by Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli Isolated From Retail Meats. Front. Microbiol. 9:2167. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02167

Received

25 May 2018

Accepted

23 August 2018

Published

12 September 2018

Volume

9 - 2018

Edited by

Learn-Han Lee, Monash University Malaysia, Malaysia

Reviewed by

Santiago Castillo Ramírez, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico; Andrea Zuccolo, Scuola Sant'Anna di Studi Avanzati, Italy; Beatrix Stessl, Veterinärmedizinische Universität Wien, Austria

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Mohamed K. Fakhr

This article was submitted to Food Microbiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics