ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol., 03 December 2018

Sec. Antimicrobials, Resistance and Chemotherapy

Volume 9 - 2018 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02929

Transcriptional Landscape of a blaKPC-2 Plasmid and Response to Imipenem Exposure in Escherichia coli TOP10

  • 1. Department of Bacteriology-Parasitology-Hygiene, Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France

  • 2. Associated French National Reference Center for Antibiotic Resistance, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France

  • 3. EA7361 “Structure, dynamic, function and expression of broad spectrum β-lactamases”, Faculty of Medicine, Paris-Sud University, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France

  • 4. Joint Research Unit Evolution and Ecology of Resistance to Antibiotics, Institut Pasteur-APHP-University Paris Sud, Paris, France

  • 5. CNRS, UMRS 3525, Paris, France

Article metrics

View details

22

Citations

6,2k

Views

3,2k

Downloads

Abstract

The diffusion of KPC-2 carbapenemase is closely related to the spread of Klebsiella pneumoniae of the clonal-group 258 and linked to IncFIIK plasmids. Little is known about the biology of multi-drug resistant plasmids and the reasons of their successful dissemination. Using E. coli TOP10 strain harboring a multi-replicon IncFIIK-IncFIB blaKPC−2-gene carrying plasmid pBIC1a from K. pneumoniae ST-258 clinical isolate BIC-1, we aimed to identify basal gene expression and the effects of imipenem exposure using whole transcriptome approach by RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq). Independently of the antibiotic pressure, most of the plasmid-backbone genes were expressed at low levels. The most expressed pBIC1a genes were involved in antibiotic resistance (blaKPC−2, blaTEM and aph(3′)-I), in plasmid replication and conjugation, or associated to mobile elements. After antibiotic exposure, 34% of E. coli (pBIC1a) genome was differentially expressed. Induction of oxidative stress response was evidenced, with numerous upregulated genes of the SoxRS/OxyR oxydative stress regulons, the Fur regulon (for iron uptake machinery), and IscR regulon (for iron sulfur cluster synthesis). Nine genes carried by pBIC1a were up-regulated, including the murein DD-endopeptidase mepM and the copper resistance operon. Despite the presence of a carbapenemase, we observed a major impact on E. coli (pBIC1a) whole transcriptome after imipenem exposure, but no effect on the level of transcription of antimicrobial resistance genes. We describe adaptive responses of E. coli to imipenem-induced stress, and identified plasmid-encoded genes that could be involved in resistance to stressful environments.

Introduction

Klebsiella pneumoniae is a prominent opportunistic pathogen for hospital- and community-acquired infections (Navon-Venezia et al., 2017). The increasing incidence of KPC-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) in health care facilities is a cause of global concern, especially in countries where the carbapenemase KPC is endemic, e.g., the United States, Israel, Greece, and Italy (Bonomo et al., 2017). The blaKPC gene, coding for an Ambler class A carbapenemase is mostly associated with K. pneumoniae but has been reported to a lesser extent in other Enterobacteriacae, in Pseudomonas spp. and in Acinetobacter baumannii (Cuzon et al., 2011, 2013). KPC confers resistance or decreased susceptibility to almost all β-lactams, and KPC-producing isolates are often resistant to many other non-β-lactam drugs because of the co-occurrence of blaKPC gene with resistance genes to other classes of antibiotics. This multidrug resistance leaves only limited therapeutic options for antimicrobial treatment, and thereby results in high mortality rates (Lee and Burgess, 2012).

The blaKPC genes have been identified on several transferable plasmids of different incompatibility goups (e.g., IncFIIK, IncA/C, IncF, IncN, IncP, IncR, IncX, and ColE1), but IncFIIK-type plasmids are the most common and are involved in their spreading (Chen et al., 2014b). The pKpQIL plasmid was the first characterized IncFIIK2blaKPC-carrying plasmid in Israel in 2006, and is strongly associated to the K. pneumoniae ST258 pandemic clone (Chen et al., 2013). Subsequently, pKpQIL-like plasmids seemed to have played a major role in KPC dissemination with several reports worldwide (Baraniak et al., 2011; García-Fernández et al., 2012; Hidalgo-Grass et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2013, 2014a; Papagiannitsis et al., 2016; Doumith et al., 2017). Complete sequencing of KPC-associated plasmids revealed their plasticity with multiple rearrangements that occurred between pKpQIL-like plasmids and pKPN3, a non-KPC-encoding IncFIIK1-FIB plasmid described in K. pneumoniae MGH78578 (also known as ATCC 700721; Chen et al., 2013; Jousset et al., 2018). However, little is known about their basic biology, and due to the presence of multiple antimicrobial resistance genes on IncFIIK plasmids, their broad host range, and their rapid dissemination, there is a need to understand the mechanisms underlying regulation and maintenance of these plasmids.

KPC is mostly associated to K. pneumoniae of a single clonal group (CG) designated CG258 containing 43 different MLST single-locus variants with ST258, ST11, ST512, and ST340 being the more predominant ones (Deleo et al., 2014; Rojas et al., 2017, 2018). KPC has also been identified in other Enterobacteriaceae such as Escherichia coli, Citrobacter sp, Enterobacter sp, Serratia marcescens, Proteus. Mirabilis, and Morganella morganii. KPC-producing E. coli isolates usually have low MICs for carbapenems and can remain susceptible according to clinical breakpoints (Landman et al., 2010). Regardless the level of carbapenem resistance, options for treatment of infections due to KPC-producing Enterobacteriaceae are limited and current clinical evidence for treatment guidelines are still lacking. Even if novel β-lactamase inhibitors (such as avibactam) are increasingly used with success (van Duin et al., 2017), carbapenem-based regimens remain a therapeutic option in many countries. Imipenem and meropenem remain useful mainly in combination with other classes of antibiotics or even another carbapenem, such as ertapenem (Bonomo et al., 2017). Pharmacokinetic parameters of the used molecule and Minimal Inhibitory Concentration value of the KPC-producing strain are also crucial in patient outcome (Tumbarello et al., 2012; Daikos et al., 2014). Tumbarello et al. showed that patients infected by carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae with imipenem MIC values ≥4 μg/mL had worse outcomes than patients whose isolates had MIC ≤ 2 μg/mL. On the contrary, therapeutic failure with use of carbapenems against KPC-2-producing isolates possessing low MICs were also reported (Weisenberg et al., 2009; Daikos and Markogiannakis, 2011). Previous studies were made to understand the transcriptional regulation of blaKPC revealing the versatile expression of this gene (Naas et al., 2012; Cheruvanky et al., 2017; Girlich et al., 2017). Measuring blaKPC RNA expression revealed that blaKPC gene copy number and the presence of different promoters cannot be strictly correlated with MICs determination and are not sufficient to explain the level of resistance regarding carbapenems (Roth et al., 2011; Naas et al., 2012). These data triggered our interest in the regulation of blaKPC gene and in the entire plasmid transcriptome, in particular under antibiotic exposure.

Effect of β-lactams on E. coli has been characterized using transcriptomic approaches. In addition to interacting with their targets, bactericidal antibiotics induce parallel changes in bacterial metabolism that promote the formation of reactive oxygen species, which play a role in cell death (Kohanski et al., 2007; Dwyer et al., 2014). β-lactams were also shown by Miller and colleagues to trigger the SOS response via the activation of the DpiAB two-component system (Miller, 2004). However, the dynamic underlying oxidative and antibiotic-induced SOS stress response activation needs further exploration. In most of these studies, sub-inhibitory doses of ampicillin were used on fully susceptible E. coli isolates expressing no β-lactamase.

To give new insights into the biology of multidrug resistance successful plasmids, the transcriptome of E. coli harboring pBIC1a, an IncFIIK2-FIB-type blaKPC−2 carrying plasmid was performed. To gain more information about the complex regulation of the blaKPC gene and all the transcripts of the cell, the transcriptome of E. coli harboring pBIC1a was performed with or without imipenem exposure. Moreover, to mimic physiopathological conditions that occur during a carbapenem-based treatment, we chose to analyse the response of E. coli (pBIC1a) to high doses of imipenem (10 times the MIC value of the strain). We described adaptive responses of E. coli (pBIC1a) to imipenem-induced stress with disruption of several metabolic pathways.

Results and discussion

Mosaic structure of pBIC1a plasmid

Plasmid pBIC1a is a blaKPC−2-encoding plasmid of 170,415 bp in-size from a ST258 K. pneumoniae BIC-1 (Jousset et al., 2018). This isolate was recovered from a contaminated endoscope in France in 2009 (Naas et al., 2010). This plasmid exhibited an average GC content of 53% and 193 predicted open reading frames (ORF). The overall structure of pBIC1a was highly similar (83% query coverage and 99% nucleotide identity by Blast) to the non-KPC carrying plasmid pKPN3 (Figure 1). Plasmids pBIC1a and pKPN3 shares a common region of 120-kb. This region contains genes responsible for plasmid replication, maintenance, transmission, and heavy metal (arsenic, copper, and silver) resistance, and presents the replicase repA2 of IncFIB type.

Figure 1

Figure 1

Schematic representation of plasmid pBIC-1a main features. Gray boxes indicate regions with high nucleotide identity (>97%) with pKPN3 (NC_009649.1), pKpQIL (GU595196.1), and pKpQIL-IT (NC_019155.1) plasmids. Genes from the forward strand are represented above the line, and genes from the reverse strand below. Antimicrobial resistance genes are indicated in red, the replicase genes in black, the heavy metal resistance operons in blue, the transfer operon in white, the genes involved in genetic mobile elements in yellow, and other plasmid-located genes in green. Δ indicates a truncated gene. Tnp: transposase. As for pKpQIL-IT, pBIC-1a carries an aminoglycoside resistance gene on a putative composite transposon-like element, IS26-aph(3′)-Ia-ΔIS26, located downstream of Tn4401a. Unlike in pKpQIL-IT, the IS26 located downstream of aph(3′)-Ia is truncated. In addition, an inversion of 3,872 nt fragment is observed as compared to pKpQIL-IT.

The rest of pBIC1a plasmid shared homology with pKpQIL-like plasmids such as pKpQIL (27% query coverage and 99.9% nucleotide identity) and pKpQIL-IT (36% query coverage and 99.3% nucleotide identity; Figure 1). This region contains the end of the tra operon, another replicase repA of IncFIIK2 type according to replicon sequence typing (Carattoli et al., 2014), making pBIC1a a multi-replicon IncFIIK2-IncFIB plasmid. The multi-replicon status can expand plasmid's host range replication (Villa et al., 2010). Like most of the pKpQIL-like plasmids, the variant blaKPC−2 gene was found as part of the class II transposon Tn4401a. Additional antimicrobial resistance genes were present: blaTEM−1, blaOXA−9 (disrupted by a frameshift mutation), aph(3)-I and partial aadA1. Furthermore, when compared to original pKpQIL, pBIC1a had an additional truncated resistance gene carried on a composite transposon-like element, IS26aphA1-ΔIS26, located downstream of Tn4401a. This element has been described in pKpQIL-IT, but differed by an inversion of a 3,872 nt fragment that occurred downstream (Figure 1).

Therefore, pBIC1a seems to be the result of several transpositions and recombination events between pKpQIL, pKpQIL-IT, and pKPN3 plasmids (Figure 2). Differently rearranged pKPN3 plasmids have been described in KPC-Kp from the USA, Greece and Italy (Chen et al., 2013; Wright et al., 2014; Papagiannitsis et al., 2016; Doumith et al., 2017). pIT-O6C07 (LT009688.1), pBK32179 (JX430448) and pGMI16-005_01 (NZ_CP028181.1) are three fully sequenced IncFIIK2-IncFIB plasmids carrying blaKPC, resulting from recombination between pKPN3 and pKpQIL-like plasmids (Figure 2). pIT-O6C07 is the closest to pBIC1a with 97% query coverage and 99% nucleotide identity (Papagiannitsis et al., 2016). The two plasmids only differed by a 4,695 nt region containing blaTEM−1 and blaOXA−9, that is missing in pIT-O6C07. Alignment of the four KPC-producing plasmids deriving from pKPN3 indicated that recombination did not occur at the same spot precisely (Figure 2). Recombination events between pKpQIL-like and pKPN3-like plasmids seem common, likely due to the presence of highly homologous regions and their frequent coexistence in K. pneumoniae.

Figure 2

Figure 2

Nucleotidic alignment of blaKPC-carrying plasmids deriving from pKPN3. pKPN3 (NC_009649.1) is a plasmid from K. pneumoniae MGH78578 that carries no β-lactamase. pIT-O6C07 (LT009688.1), pBK32179 (JX430448), pGMI16-005_01 (NZ_CP028181.1) are KPC-producing plasmids deriving from recombination between pKPN3 and pKpQIL-like plasmids. From the inside to the outside, the different circles represent: pBIC1a GC content (black) and open reading frames annotation (red), pBIC1a GC skew (purple and green), alignment with pIT-O6C07 (pink), alignment with pBK32179 (red), alignement with pGMI16-005 (blue), alignment with pKPN3 (green). This circular representation was performed using BRIG.

Transcriptome analysis of E. coli (pBIC1a)

E. coli TOP10, transformed with the KPC-carrying plasmid pBIC1a, was grown at mid-log phase in rich media (Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) liquid media). Two conditions in biological triplicates were studied: liquid exponential growth as control and liquid exponential growth supplemented with imipenem at final concentration of 5 μg/ml (10 times the MIC value of TOP10-pBIC1a for imipenem, which was determined at 0.5 μg/ml using E-Test). This concentration was chosen because it can be achieved in human serum during the treatment of a bacteriemia due to a KPC-producing Enterobacteriaceae after intravenous administration of 1,000 mg of imipenem-cilastatin (Singlas, 1990; Signs et al., 1992). Imipenem exposure was limited to 10 min to evaluate the immediate cellular response and limit bacterial cell death. The viability of bacterial cells was verified by time-kill analysis and no effect on survival was observed after 10 min exposure to imipenem (Figure S1).

After 10 min of exposure, extraction of total RNA was performed on each replicate. Libraries were obtained from ribo-depleted RNA. After sequencing, a mean of 27.9 ± 3.3 million reads per individual library was obtained. Reads were aligned on E. coli TOP10 (CP000948.1) and pBIC1a (CP022574.1) DNA sequences, with 97.25% ± 0.78% of the reads mapping on non-ribosomal regions (Table S1). The principal component analysis (PCA) and the clustering heatmap plots revealed that the samples clustered to their biological replicates (Figure S2).

Transcriptional landscape of pBIC1a in the absence of imipenem

In BHI medium and exponential growth phase, the replicases repA IncFIIK, repA IncFIB, and the regulator repB IncFIIK genes were expressed with reads per kilobase per million mapped reads (RPKM) values of 127, 224, and 643 respectively. These genes were used for subsequent comparisons as they are involved in plasmid replication and should be expressed consistently during exponential growth due to continuous cell division (Lang et al., 2012).

Alignment of reads on pBIC1a sequence was performed and heatmap visualization was used to identify highly or weakly transcribed regions using IGV software (Robinson et al., 2011).

Most of the plasmid genes were expressed at low levels or not expressed during exponential phase in BHI medium, with only 34 of predicted CDS (17%) having RKPM values above the repA IncFIIK gene RPKM value (Table 1; Figure 3). These results are comparable with those found in a previous transcriptomic analysis of a multidrug resistance-encoding plasmid where most of the backbone was transcriptionally silent in E. coli (Lang et al., 2012). Among the plasmid scaffold genes, higA antitoxin gene, part of HigA/HigB type II toxin/antitoxin system was highly expressed suggesting a role in pBIC1a maintenance in E. coli. Most genes involved in plasmid transfer function were expressed at low levels, except the genes encoding TraM (relaxosome protein), TraA (pilin precursor), TraL (pilus assembly protein), TraT (surface exclusion protein), and TraS (entry exclusion protein; Figure 3).

Table 1

pBIC1aGene nameOrientationAnnotationRPKM value
pBIC_00001+Aldehyde dehydrogenase35
pBIC_00002+Putative resolvase12
pBIC_00003+Hypothetical protein23
pBIC_00004+Hypothetical protein144
pBIC_00005p019 of ISKpn311,840
pBIC_00006Transposase20
pBIC_00007+Mobile element protein8
pBIC_00008+Tnp-ISKpn68
pBIC_00009blaKPC−2KPC-22,706
pBIC_00010Hypothetical protein294
pBIC_00011istAISKpn70
pBIC_00012istBISKpn71
pBIC_00013TnpATransposase4
pBIC_00014TnpR+Resolvase13
pBIC_00015+Hypothetical protein2,261
pBIC_00016+Hypothetical protein76
pBIC_00017+Transposase65
pBIC_00018Hypothetical protein220
pBIC_00019finOIncF plasmid conjugative transfer fertility inhibition protein FinO328
pBIC_00020repADNA replication protein (IncFIIk)127
pBIC_00021repBReplication regulatory protein643
pBIC_00022nucCEndonuclease13
pBIC_00023Hypothetical protein35
pBIC_00024yihAHypothetical protein13
pBIC_00025Hypothetical protein14
pBIC_00026Hypothetical protein11
pBIC_00027finOIncF plasmid conjugative transfer fertility inhibition protein FinO72
pBIC_00028traXIncF plasmid conjugative transfer pilin acetylase TraX14
pBIC_00029traIIncF plasmid conjugative transfer DNA-nicking and unwinding protein TraI10
pBIC_00030traDIncF plasmid conjugative transfer protein TraD7
pBIC_00031Hypothetical protein8
pBIC_00032traTIncF plasmid conjugative transfer surface exclusion protein TraT282
pBIC_00033traSIncF plasmid conjugative transfer surface exclusion protein TraS231
pBIC_00034traGIncF plasmid conjugative transfer protein TraG56
pBIC_00035traHIncF plasmid conjugative transfer pilus assembly protein TraH6
pBIC_00036Hypothetical protein4
pBIC_00037trbBIncF plasmid conjugative transfer protein TrbB7
pBIC_00038traQIncF plasmid conjugative transfer protein TraQ6
pBIC_00039traFIncF plasmid conjugative transfer pilus assembly protein TraF6
pBIC_00040Hypothetical protein19
pBIC_00041Hypothetical protein14
pBIC_00042trbEIncF plasmid conjugative transfer protein TrbE5
pBIC_00043traNIncF plasmid conjugative transfer protein TraN10
pBIC_00044trbCIncF plasmid conjugative transfer protein TrbC7
pBIC_00045traUIncF plasmid conjugative transfer pilus assembly protein TraU10
pBIC_00046traWIncF plasmid conjugative transfer pilus assembly protein TraW8
pBIC_00047trbIIncF plasmid conjugative transfer protein TrbI9
pBIC_00048traCIncF plasmid conjugative transfer pilus assembly protein TraC11
pBIC_00049Hypothetical protein12
pBIC_00050Hypothetical protein11
pBIC_00051Hypothetical protein9
pBIC_00052Hypothetical protein7
pBIC_00053Hypothetical protein14
pBIC_00054traVIncF plasmid conjugative transfer pilus assembly protein TraV22
pBIC_00055traPIncF plasmid conjugative transfer protein TraP22
pBIC_00056traBIncF plasmid conjugative transfer pilus assembly protein TraB21
pBIC_00057traKIncF plasmid conjugative transfer pilus assembly protein TraK25
pBIC_00058traEIncF plasmid conjugative transfer pilus assembly protein TraE36
pBIC_00059traLIncF plasmid conjugative transfer pilus assembly protein TraL433
pBIC_00060traAIncF plasmid conjugative transfer pilin protein TraA656
pBIC_00061traYIncF plasmid conjugative transfer regulator TraY65
pBIC_00062traJIncF plasmid conjugative transfer regulator TraJ34
pBIC_00063traMIncF plasmid conjugative transfer mating signal transduction protein TraM429
pBIC_00064+Lytic transglycosylase295
pBIC_00065Hypothetical protein16
pBIC_00066Unnamed protein product20
pBIC_00067+Hypothetical protein5
pBIC_00068higAAntitoxine HigA223
pBIC_00069Hypothetical protein phage-related400
pBIC_00070Hypothetical protein17
pBIC_00071Hypothetical protein14
pBIC_00072Hypothetical protein23
pBIC_00073Hypothetical protein163
pBIC_00074Hypothetical protein144
pBIC_00075Hypothetical protein15
pBIC_00076+Mobile element protein22
pBIC_00077Hypothetical protein19
pBIC_00078Hypothetical protein2
pBIC_00079psiAPsiA protein2
pBIC_00080psiBPsiB protein3
pBIC_00081Hypothetical protein4
pBIC_00082parBParB5
pBIC_00083ssbSingle-stranded DNA-binding protein7
pBIC_00084+Hypothetical protein5
pBIC_00085SAM-dependent methyltransferase3
pBIC_00086Hypothetical protein3
pBIC_00087ydaBYdaB2
pBIC_00088Hypothetical protein11
pBIC_00089Hypothetical protein53
pBIC_00090DNA polymerase III theta subunit52
pBIC_00091Antirestriction protein klcA6
pBIC_00092+Hypothetical protein9
pBIC_00093Hypothetical protein47
pBIC_00094Retron-type RNA-directed DNA polymerase; Ontology_term49
pBIC_00095umuD+Error-prone repair protein UmuD17
pBIC_00096umuC+Error-prone lesion bypass DNA polymerase V (UmuC)11
pBIC_00097Mobile element protein15
pBIC_00098Mobile element protein26
pBIC_00099+Hypothetical protein2
pBIC_00100Hypothetical protein13
pBIC_00101sopB/parBChromosome (plasmid) partitioning protein ParB55
pBIC_00102sopA/parAChromosome (plasmid) partitioning protein ParA53
pBIC_00103repA2+Replicase (IncFI)224
pBIC_00104Resolvase/Recombinase36
pBIC_00105+Hypothetical protein3
pBIC_00106+Sensor domain-containing diguanylate cyclase43
pBIC_00107+Mobile element protein (IS903B)2
pBIC_00108+Hypothetical protein36
pBIC_00109+Putative membrane protein YjcC12
pBIC_00110Hypothetical protein4
pBIC_00111Hypothetical protein16
pBIC_00112Secondary glycine betaine transporter BetU54
pBIC_00113Mobile element protein (IS1F)10
pBIC_00114Mobile element protein (IS1F)18
pBIC_00115Mobile element protein (ISEc11)53
pBIC_00116Mobile element protein (ISEc11)23
pBIC_00117+Mobile element protein21
pBIC_00118+Mobile element protein4
pBIC_00119Silver-binding protein107
pBIC_00120cusSOsmosensitive K+ channel histidine kinase48
pBIC_00121cusRCopper-sensing two-component system response regulator CusR139
pBIC_00122cusC+Cation efflux system protein CusC precursor5
pBIC_00123cusF+Cation efflux system protein CusF precursor17
pBIC_00124cusB+Cobalt/zinc/cadmium efflux RND transporter membrane fusion protein CzcB family10
pBIC_00125cusA+Cobalt-zinc-cadmium resistance protein CzcAB Cation efflux system protein CusA7
pBIC_00126copG+CopG protein27
pBIC_00127+Lead cadmium zinc and mercury transporting ATPase B Copper-translocating P-type ATPase14
pBIC_00128+hypothetical protein42
pBIC_00129mepMCell wall endopeptidase-family M23/M3749
pBIC_00130Copper-binding protein PcoE22
pBIC_00131+Multicopper oxidase51
pBIC_00132copB+Copper resistance protein B32
pBIC_00133copC+Copper resistance protein CopC53
pBIC_00134copD+Copper resistance protein D46
pBIC_00135+DNA-binding heavy metal response regulator57
pBIC_00136+Heavy metal sensor histidine kinase33
pBIC_00137+Probable copper-binding protein30
pBIC_00138Hypothetical protein25
pBIC_00139Mobile element protein18
pBIC_00140+Aquaporin Z13
pBIC_00141N-acetyltransferase48
pBIC_00142arsR+Arsenical resistance operon repressor21
pBIC_00143arsH+Arsenic resistance protein ArsH39
pBIC_00144+Hypothetical protein47
pBIC_00145arsD+Arsenical resistance operon trans-acting repressor ArsD9
pBIC_00146+Arsenical pump-driving ATPase4
pBIC_00147+Arsenical pump-driving ATPase4
pBIC_00148+Hypothetical protein12
pBIC_00149Arsenate reductase91
pBIC_00150Arsenic efflux pump protein18
pBIC_00151Arsenical pump-driving ATPas48
pBIC_00152arsDArsenical resistance operon trans-acting repressor ArsD77
pBIC_00153arsRArsenical resistance operon repressor163
pBIC_00154+Hypothetical protein77
pBIC_00155ydeA+YdeA protein85
pBIC_00156+DNA binding protein47
pBIC_00157+Hypothetical protein37
pBIC_00158+Haemolysin expression modulating protein87
pBIC_00159+Hypothetical protein191
pBIC_00160+Hypothetical protein535
pBIC_00161+Hypothetical protein269
pBIC_00162+N-acetyltransferase333
pBIC_00163+Transposase28
pBIC_00164Hypothetical protein33
pBIC_00165Mobile element protein79
pBIC_00166Mobile element protein28
pBIC_00167Zn-dependent protease57
pBIC_00168Diguanylate cyclase170
pBIC_00169Hypothetical protein210
pBIC_00170clpATP-dependent Clp protease ATP-binding subunit ClpA409
pBIC_00171hspSmall HspC2 heat shock protein795
pBIC_00172DNA binding protein591
pBIC_00173Transposase14
pBIC_00174Hypothetical protein11
pBIC_00175+Mobile element protein (ISKpn26)2
pBIC_00176+Mobile element protein (ISKpn26)15
pBIC_00177+Hypothetical protein7
pBIC_00178Mobile element protein1
pBIC_00179cbbRRuBisCO operon transcriptional regulator CbbR2
pBIC_00180Phosphonate dehydrogenase (NAD-dependent phosphite dehydrogenase)4
pBIC_00181phnEPhosphonate ABC transporter permease protein phnE5
pBIC_00182Phosphonate ABC transporter phosphate-binding periplasmic component2
pBIC_00183phnC1Phosphonate ABC transporter ATP-binding protein3
pBIC_00184+Mobile element protein4
pBIC_00185Mobile element protein (IS26)6
pBIC_00186+TnpA transposase (IS26)8
pBIC_00187+Mobile element protein (partial IS26)22
pBIC_00188ΔblaOXA−9+Beta-lactamase class D (partial OXA-9)6
pBIC_00189ΔblaOXA−9+Beta-lactamase class D (partial OXA-9)6
pBIC_00190+Mobile element protein (partial Tn3)241
pBIC_00191blaTEM−1+Beta-lactamase TEM-1175
pBIC_00192Mobile element protein (partial IS26)13
pBIC_00193aph(3)-I+Aminoglycoside phosphotransferase655

Expression analysis of pBIC1a genes without imipenem exposure using RPKM values.

Genes with RPKM values above the RPKM value of IncFIIK replicase repA are highlighted in gray.

Figure 3

Figure 3

Expression of pBIC1a genes in the absence of antibiotic. The coverage (expressed as the average density of reads over 500 nt fragments) was computed on each strand of pBIC1a sequence and visualized by using a heatmap representation (IGV software). Open Reading Frames (ORFs) annotated on the strand (+ or sens) are indicated in red boxes and ORFs annotated on the strand (– or rev) are indicated in blue boxes. Known annotation of the most expressed genes are mentioned on a supplementary line for both strands. Both replicases (repA IncFIIK-type and repA2 IncFIB-type) are highlighted in green. Genes associated to plasmid transfer are boxed in red.

Tansformation of pBIC1a into the E. coli background only resulted into a slight increase in the MIC for imipenem (0.5 μg/ml compared to 0.25 μg/ml in E. coli TOP10 wild-type strain). However, our RNA-seq experiments showed that blaKPC−2 gene was the most expressed plasmidic gene (Table 1; Figure 3). Two promoters were previously shown to contribute to blaKPC−2 gene expression (Naas et al., 2012). Although our RNA-sequencing protocol was not designed to precisely map transcription start sites, the high coverage by sequencing reads upstream the p1 promoter sequence strongly suggests promoter p2 as the main promoter for blaKPC−2 gene transcription (Figure S3). In addition, RNA-seq analysis revealed no clear transcription termination with reads continuously covering more than one kb downstream blaKPC−2 stop codon (Figure S3). In agreement with this observation, no rho-independent termination site could be predicted by bioinformatic tools (http://rna.igmors.u-psud.fr/toolbox/arnold/). This transcription covered in antisense the transposase gene of ISKpn6. It might therefore act as a repressor for ISKpn6 transposition as an antisense RNA, and/or play a role in the regulation of KPC through mRNA stability as observed for other 3′-UTR (Ruiz de los Mozos et al., 2013).

Other resistance genes carried by the plasmid, namely blaTEM−1 and aph(3′)-Ia genes were also highly expressed (Table 1; Figure 3). The high expression of aph(3)-Ia gene is in accordance with the high level resistance to kanamycin observed (MIC > 32 μg/ml). The association of blaKPC gene with other antibiotic resistance determinants also highly expressed provides a very simple scenario for a carbapenemase to spread as a hitchhiker gene, especially in the absence of carbapenem selection.

Different operons involved in metal resistance were identified on pBIC1a: the cus (cusCFBA) and cop (copABCDR) operons involved in copper and other cations efflux, and the ars operon (arsRDABC) in arsenical resistance. Here, only the regulators genes cusR and arsR were highly transcribed. CusR is part of the two component system CusRS that activates the transcription of cusCFBA genes in the presence of Cu/Ag (Xiao et al., 2017). pKPN3-like plasmids carrying the highly similar sil or cus operons are known to confer resistance to high silver concentration in K. pneumoniae and in Enterobacter cloacae (Finley et al., 2015). On the contrary, ArsR acts as a repressor for the arsenical resistance operon (Ren et al., 2017).

Several mobile elements and insertion sequences (IS) were identified on pBIC1a including one copy of ISKpn6, ISKpn7, ISKpn26-like, ISKpn28, ISKpn32, IS1, IS903, and ISEcl1 (Figure 1). In addition to these elements, several fragments of IS26 were identified. These IS were not or weakly expressed that is in accordance with the tight regulation of ISs (Nagy and Chandler, 2004). An interesting feature of ISKpn31 was the expression of its passenger gene. Whereas, the transposase gene was almost not expressed, its passenger gene (pBIC_0005) belonged to the top expressed genes of the plasmid. This encoded protein is named p019 and has been identified on matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) spectra of K. pneumoniae harboring pKpQIL-like plasmids (Lau et al., 2014; Partridge, 2014). The presence of a peptide signal indicates a probable export but this protein does not share homology with protein with known function.

Recently, Buckner et al. studied the expression of two blaKPC-producing pKpQIL-like plasmids in K. pneumoniae, and revealed that 60% of plasmid-encoded genes were expressed. These genes included genes involved in replication, transmission, stability, recombination and toxin-antitoxin systems (Buckner et al., 2018). Comparison of pKpQIL-UK, pKpQIL-D2, and pBIC1a transcripts revealed common expressed genes, including blaKPC, blaTEM, repA, traALMTS, finO, tnp gene coding for Tn3 transposase. There are growing evidence for the existence of “core” expressed genes associated to pKpQIL-like plasmids, expressed in both K. pneumoniae and E. coli genetic backgrounds.

Imipenem-induced response in E. coli (pBIC1a): global changes

After imipenem exposure, we observed a major impact on E. coli (pBIC1a) whole transcriptome with 1,563 RNAs being differentially expressed (with adjusted p-values ≤ 0.05) among a total of 4,550 (34%). 35% (1,535 over 4,357) of chromosomally-encoded genes and 14% (28 over 193) of pBIC1a genes were affected by imipenem exposure. 765 RNAs were up-regulated and 798 were down-regulated (Table S2). Among differentially expressed genes, 154 RNAs had a Fold-Change (FC) >2 and 329 RNAs had a FC < 0.5. Differential expression of eight selected genes (four up-regulated and four down-regulated genes) was confirmed by RT-qPCR (Figure S4).

Imipenem-induced response at the plasmid pBIC1a level

Effect of imipenem on all pBIC1a transcripts is indicated in Table S3. After imipenem addition in culture medium, nine predicted CDS of pBIC1a were up-regulated but none with a FC >2 (Table 2). Transcription of copper resistance operon (copABDRS/pcoE) was induced after imipenem exposure, with FC values < 2. With two oxidation states Cu+ and Cu2+, copper is a cofactor in redox enzymes that uses dioxygen as a substrate (Rademacher and Masepohl, 2012). Bacteria synthetize various cuproenzymes, which play important roles in cellular processes such as energy transduction, iron mobilization and oxidative stress (Rademacher and Masepohl, 2012). In excess, copper becomes toxic as it interacts with free proteinogenic thiol groups, destabilizes iron–sulfur cofactors, and possibly leads to formation of ROS (Chillappagari et al., 2010; Rademacher and Masepohl, 2012). Activation of the copper resistance operon could act as a defense factor to limit toxicity induced by high copper intracellular concentration, hence ROS production (Bondarczuk and Piotrowska-Seget, 2013). The chromosomally-encoded small RybA (also known as MntS) could be involved in this positive regulation. It was up-regulated after imipenem exposure (FC = 3.5 p-value = 4.14e-39). RybA transcripts are stabilized under peroxide stress and members of the CusR regulon are downregulated in a ΔrybA mutant, suggesting that RybA could be a positive regulator of genes involved in copper detoxification (Gerstle et al., 2012).

Table 2

IdNameCounts (without imipenem)Counts (with imipenem)Fold-Changelog2(Fold-Change)Adjusted p-valueAnnotation
DOWN-REGULATED GENES
pBIC_00006pBIC_00006110770.697−0.5220.018900674Transposase (ISKpn31)
pBIC_00007pBIC_000072471100.45−1.1525E-12Transposase DDE domain protein
pBIC_00008pBIC_000082561040.412−1.2811.20E-13Transposase (ISKpn6)
pBIC_00034pBIC_000344,1253,0520.741−0.4323.15E-05Conjugal transfert protein TraG
pBIC_00064pBIC_000643,7453,1730.848−0.2380.047283777Lytic Transglycosylase
pBIC_00068higA4,0043,2930.823−0.280.013712564Antitoxin HigA
pBIC_00069pBIC_000693,6002,7840.774−0.3690.000846589Hypothetical protein
pBIC_00097pBIC_000973232040.635−0.6556.44E-06Putative transposase
pBIC_00098pBIC_00098190920.491−1.0275.31E-07Helix-turn-helix domain protein
pBIC_00108pBIC_00108119500.43−1.2184.94E-08Hypothetical protein
pBIC_00109yjcC4503000.669−0.5797.65E-06Putative membrane protein YjcC
pBIC_00168pBIC_001683,2822,4290.741−0.4330.000196756Diguanylate cyclase
pBIC_00169pBIC_001691,0638400.791−0.3380.027066196Hypothetical protein
pBIC_00170clpC29,46322,1470.753−0.410.000216524ATP-dependent Clp protease ATP-binding subunit ClpC
pBIC_00171hspA11,6477,7750.669−0.584.35E-07Heat shock protein
pBIC_00172pBIC_001724,2742,6620.624−0.681.51E-08Helix-turn-helix domain protein
pBIC_00176pBIC_001763792660.704−0.5070.001793481Transposase (ISKpn26)
pBIC_00177pBIC_00177108750.695−0.5250.029045775Hypothetical protein
pBIC_00186pBIC_001862171650.764−0.3880.040167906Transposase (IS26)
UP-REGULATED GENES
pBIC_00010pBIC_000101,8072,1071.1650.220.048646696Hypothetical protein
pBIC_00107pBIC_0010748931.9110.9350.003155501Transposase
pBIC_00129mepM9371,2881.3740.4581.94E-04Murein DD-endopeptidase MepM
pBIC_00131copA2,4043,0181.2530.3260.003442412Copper resistance protein A precursor
pBIC_00132copB7259391.2910.3690.035026611Copper resistance protein B precursor
pBIC_00134copD1,1071,3731.2390.3090.008349118Copper resistance protein D
pBIC_00135copR1,0011,1881.1850.2450.023543192Transcriptional activator protein CopR
pBIC_00136copS1,2051,4911.2370.3070.009481833Sensor kinase CopS
pBIC_00137pcoE3364231.2550.3280.030486108Putative copper-binding protein PcoE precursor

Differentially expressed genes carried by pBIC1a.

Genes with FC values < 0.5 are highlighted in gray.

Among the membrane associated regulated genes, a plasmid-encoded murein DD-endopeptidase called mepM (pBIC_00129) was up-regulated (FC = 1.37 p-value = 1.9e-04). Search for conserved domains using the NCBI Database identified MepM as a member of LytM domain containing proteins, that include numerous autolysins involved in peptidoglycan remodeling (Uehara et al., 2009). Bacteria mutated for such enzymes form longer chains due to a default in cell separation (Visweswaran et al., 2013). On the contrary, overexpression of LysM-associated proteins lead to increased autolysis (Uehara et al., 2009; Visweswaran et al., 2013). This small activation of mepM could be an indirect consequence of the interaction of imipenem with its Penicillin Binding Proteins (PBP), reflecting an early activation of bacterial lysis (Uehara et al., 2009), though not observed through time-kill experiments (Figure S1).

The chromosomal copy of mepM (also known as yebA) of E. coli MG1655 was previously shown to be up-regulated under oxidative stress (Seo et al., 2015). Here, we only observed the up-regulation of the plasmid-encoded endopeptidase. The two proteins differed by their size and molecular weight, with plasmid-encoded MepM being a 27.08 kDa protein vs. 49.04 kDa for the chromosomal copy. They shared only 41% of amino-acid identity, suggesting that both enzymes might have different cellular functions.

We specifically looked at the level of blaKPC−2 gene expression that was not modified in the presence of imipenem (FC = 1.12, p-value = 0.14). There is no genetic argument for an inducible expression of blaKPC−2 and our results were in agreement with a constitutive expression (Naas et al., 2012).

Finally, 19 predicted CDS of pBIC1a were down-regulated with p-values < 0.05, and four of them with FC values < 0.5 (Table 2). Six down-regulated genes coded for transposases from various IS. Down-regulation of two helix-turn-helix domain proteins (pBIC_00098 and pBIC_00172) was also observed with p-values of 5.31E-07 and 1.51E-08, respectively. Such proteins may act as global regulators for gene expression (Aravind et al., 2005).

Imipenem-induced response at the chromosomal level

Most of the transcriptomic variations induced by imipenem exposure affected E. coli chromosomal genes, with 756 genes (17.4%) being up-regulated and 779 genes (17.9%) down-regulated over 4,357 genes.

To focused on the most significant changes, as a first step, we analyzed global changes on genes with FC values >2 (154 genes) or < 0.5 (325 genes). To identify common metabolic pathways, genes were analyzed for gene ontology (GO) term enrichment using PANTHER web application. Enriched GO terms from up-regulated genes (adjusted p-values ranging from 2.23e-4 to 0.053) and from down-regulated genes (adjusted p-values ranging from 2.22e-10 to 0.047) were further explored separately on the REVIGO web application to visualize relationships and redundancy among GO terms (Supek et al., 2011; Figure 4). An activation of the aerobic respiration was observed with enrichment in the pathway of electron transport chain (p-value = 0.014). Expression of genes involved in cluster Fe-S assembly (p-value = 0.016) and in ion transport (p-value = 0.015) was also affected. Besides, downregulated genes were mostly associated to anaerobic respiration (p-value 2.22e-10) and generation of precursors of metabolites and energy (p-value 2.55e-10). Up and down-regulated genes were enriched in oxydo-reduction process (p-values 0.015 and 1.82e-07 respectively), suggesting that oxidative stress might have occurred in bacterial cells after imipenem exposure (Figure 4).

Figure 4

Figure 4

Biological process GO terms enrichment analysis in response to imipenem in E. coli (pBIC-1a). Scatterplots showing the non-redundant up (A) and down-regulated (B) GO terms significantly enriched after imipenem exposure. GO enrichment was determined by PANTHER web application and GO terms significantly enriched with adjusted p-values under 0.05 were summarized by using REVIGO. Only chromosomal genes were analyzed. The axes have no intrinsic meaning, similar GO terms remain close together in the plot. The bubble size indicates the frequency of the GO term. (A) upregulated genes revealed enrichment in energy production processes (aerobic respiration and electron transport chain), in ion transport and in cluster Fe-S assembly. (B) Downregulated genes were mostly associated to anaerobic respiration, generation of precursors of metabolites and energy. Both up and down-regulated genes summarization revealed an enrichment in oxidoreduction process.

Imipenem induces the activation of several regulons linked to oxidative stress in E. coli (pBIC1a)

We searched for genes that could be related to regulons induced by oxidative stress conditions in E. coli (Zheng et al., 2001; Blanchard et al., 2007; Seo et al., 2015). Activation of 9 genes that belonged to the SoxRS regulon was observed e.g., the superoxide dismutase sodA (FC = 2.1, adjusted p-value = 4.6e-20), the fumarate hydratase fumC (FC = 2.2, adjusted p-value = 8.3e-10), the aconitate hydratase acnA (FC = 1.9, adjusted p-value = 2.4e-13), the paraquat-inducible membrane protein A pqiA (FC = 1.4, adjusted p-value = 3.8e-06; Table S4). SoxR is a transcription factor containing [2Fe-2S] clusters, which is the sensor enhancing the expression of SoxS in response to oxidative stress (Lushchak, 2011). Then, SoxS regulates genes implicated in superoxide scavenging, carbon metabolism, DNA repair and xenobiotic efflux (Blanchard et al., 2007). Our transcriptomic data revealed differential gene expression of other regulons linked to oxidative stress response in E. coli, such as the OxyR regulon (grxA, trxC, …), the IscR regulon for Iron-Sulfur cluster binding and assembly (iscR, iscA, iscU, iscS, bfd, fdx…) and the Fur regulon for iron homeostasis and uptake machinery (fep, fepD, fepG, fecR, efeB, efeU, yncD…; Table S4).

Activation of the tricarboxylic acid cycle

Induction of oxidative stress after exposure to β-lactams has been observed in previous studies (Kaldalu et al., 2004; Belenky et al., 2015). Kohanski et al. (2007) and Dwyer et al. (2014) proposed a model explaining how bactericidal antibiotics were able to generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) in bacterial cells in addition to their main mode of action (Kohanski et al., 2007; Dwyer et al., 2014). According to these studies, interactions between β-lactams and Penicillin-Binding Proteins (PBPs) stimulate the oxidation of NADH through the electron transport chain, which is dependent on the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle. Hyperactivation of the electron transport chain stimulates superoxide (O2−) formation, which overwhelms superoxide dismutase defenses and leads to the oxidation of iron-sulfur clusters ([4Fe−4S]2+) employed by numerous dehydratase enzymes. The release of ferrous (Fe2+) irons leads to hydroxyl radicals (OH*) via the Fenton reaction, which damage DNA, lipids and proteins and therefore contributes to antibiotic-induced cell death.

Activation of the TCA cycle and new iron-sulfur cluster synthesis have been shown to play critical roles in the initiation of the oxidative stress response after antibiotic exposure (Kohanski et al., 2010). Interestingly, our transcriptomic data revealed an overexpression of almost all TCA enzymes (Table S2; Figure 5).

Figure 5

Figure 5

Metabolic response of E. coli pBIC-1a to imipenem exposure. Activation of the electron transport chain pathway dependent on the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle was observed, and is thought to generate ROS according to the model proposed by Kohanski et al. and Dwyer et al. (Kohanski et al., 2007; Dwyer et al., 2014). We observed an up-regulation of most of the TCA cycle enzymes, of many genes involved in Iron–Sulfur cluster biogenesis and assembly, and of several metal ions permeases that are assumed to fuel the Fenton reaction. Detoxification process occured to limit protein damages and ROS accumulation with up-regulation of superoxide dismutase sodA. Several genes involved in bacterial cell wall homeostasis were disturbed. Activation of the plasmidic murein endopeptidase mepM might modify bacterial peptidoglycan and reflect an early activation of bacterial lysis. Transcriptional regulators are written in bold. ↑ means up-regulated and ↓ means down-regulated. LPS, lipopolysaccharide; OM, outer membrane; IM, inner membrane. Reactions of the TCA cycle: 1. Pyruvate dehydrogenase, 2. Citrate synthase, 3. Aconitase, 4. Isocitrate dehydrogenase, 5. α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase, 6. SuccinylCoA thiokinase, 7.Succinate dehydrogenase, 8. Fumarate reductase 9. Fumarase, 10. Malate dehydrogenase.

A critical parameter to suppress Fenton reaction is the scavenging of H2O2 generated in bacterial cells by sodA. This can occur through the activation of peroxidases like KatG, KatE, AhpC, AhpF, or the protein complex Hcp-Hcr being a putative hydroxylamine reductase or a peroxidase (Wolfe et al., 2002; Almeida et al., 2006). Here, only the two copies of ahpF were slightly up-regulated (with FC values < 2). Of note, katG and hcp-hcr were even down-regulated. Our results suggest that no H2O2 detoxification was highlighted by RNA-Seq after 10 min of imipenem exposure. Microarray data collected by Dwyer et al. also observed down-regulation of katG and hcp-hcr in E. coli MG1655 exposed to ampicillin (Dwyer et al., 2014). Nevertheless, in this study, overexpression of E. coli katG and ahpCF partially protected the bacteria from β-lactams lethality, confirming the protective role these peroxidases.

Genes related to Fe–S clusters biogenesis and iron recruiting

In addition, we observed up-regulation of numerous Fe-S cluster binding proteins and Fe-S cluster assembly proteins (iscS, iscU, iscA, yadR, and gntY) indicating an activation of the Fe-S cluster biogenesis. Consistent with this, genes encoding proteins related to iron uptake and storage were regulated following imipenem exposure. Several iron permeases were up-regulated such as efeU (ferrous iron permease) (validated by RT-qPCR), efeB (exogenous heme iron acquisition), fecI (minor sigma factor that initiates transcription of ferric citrate transport genes), fecR, fepB, fepD, fegG (ferric enterobactin ABC transporter complex), and yncD (outer membrane protein involved in iron transport). In parallel, bfd gene encoding iron storage protein bacterioferritin-associated ferredoxin was up-regulated but not its partner coding the bacterioferritin Bfr. Bfd and Bfr can store iron as ferric iron to protect cells against ROS resulting from ferrous iron overload (Andrews et al., 2003).

The uptaken Fe2+ could also be reintegrated into Fe-S clusters to stabilize dehydratases and therefore be a metabolic feedback to counteract antibiotic toxicity (Py and Barras, 2010). YtfE is a protein known to recruit and integrate Fe2+ to repair Fe-S cluster damaged proteins (Py and Barras, 2010). Here, ytfE was not induced in our conditions (FC = 0.816, p-value = 0.16), suggesting that no suppression of Fenton reaction occurred through ytfE. Therefore, Fe2+ uptake could directly fuel Fenton reaction to produce the highly reactive HO* and contribute to maintain oxidative stress.

Genes involved in cell wall

Imipenem is an antibiotic targeting bacterial cell wall biogenesis. Therefore, we looked at cell envelope components that could be implicated in reducing entry of antibiotic or in resistance to osmotic stress.

Among the osmotic stress-inducible genes, ybaY, bdm, and osmY were up-regulated. YbaY is a lipoprotein associated to various stress responses like the oxidative stress response (Cheung et al., 2003), the RpoS-induced stress (Weber et al., 2005), and the osmotic stress response (Asakura and Kobayashi, 2009). Bdm is involved in flagellar biosynthesis, and its overexpression, regulated by the RcsB transcriptional activator, enhances biofilm formation (Sim et al., 2010; Kim et al., 2015). Here, RcsA/RcsB regulators that belong to the multicomponent RcsF/RcsC/RcsD/RcsA-RcsB phosphorelay system were indeed up-regulated upon imipenem addition (Gottesman and Stout, 1991; Majdalani and Gottesman, 2005). Any perturbation of the peptidoglycan activates the Rcs phosphorelay, and RcsB activity enables bacteria to survive in the presence of the antibiotics (Laubacher and Ades, 2008), possibly due to a modification of bacterial cell wall through synthesis of the colanic acid capsular exopolysaccharide. Modification of expression of other genes belonging to the Rcs regulon and involved in flagellar biosynthesis was observed, like the downregulation of flhC/flhD.

Few genes associated to membrane components were down-regulated, like ompW coding for an outer-membrane porin. Expression of ompW was validated by RT-qPCR (Figure S4). OmpW has been implicated in the adaptation to stresses in various species, but its biological function is not yet fully characterized. ompW expression was decreased in E. coli in response to oxidative stress by an unknown mechanism (Blanchard et al., 2007). Recently, Xia et al. revealed a role in the carbon and energy metabolism in E. coli (Xiao et al., 2016). Expression of ompW is modulated by various regulators including RybB, a small RNA dependent on the alternative sigma factor σE, and the transcriptional regulator FNR (Fumarate and Nitrate Reduction) particularly important during anaerobic transition (Xiao et al., 2016). Here, both rybB and fnr were overexpressed after imipenem addition (FC = 1.546; p-value = 0.023 and FC = 2.38; p-value = 1.1e-46 respectively) and thus probably involved in ompW regulation.

In parallel to ompW down-regulation, several efflux pumps were up-regulated, mdfA (also known as cmr) mdtK and sugE, with FC values < 2. These proteins are part of multi-drugs efflux pumps and could help bacteria to get rid of carbapenems and/or oxidative compounds.

Small RNAs

Bacterial small RNAs are major actors for bacterial adaptation to various stresses and some of them are involved in regulatory circuits controlling antibiotic resistance (Felden and Cattoir, 2018). For instance, sRNA can control antimicrobial intracellular concentration by regulating the expression of several outer membrane proteins and efflux pumps. They can also regulate the expression of bacterial component like the LPS or enzymes involved in cell wall biosynthesis (Felden and Cattoir, 2018).

Following imipenem exposure, 14 sRNAs were differentially expressed (Table S5): 11 were up-regulated and 3 were down-regulated.

IsrB, also known as AzuC, was the most induced sRNA (FC = 10.334; p-value = 4.26e-80). No target has been clearly identified to date, but hydrogen peroxide treatment could also induce AzuC expression 4-fold in a previous study in E. coli, suggesting a role in oxidative stress response (Hemm et al., 2010).

cyaR (also known as ryeE) (FC = 1.93; p-values = 1.33e-12) and omrA (also known as rygA) (FC = 1.88; p-value = 6.3e-5) are known to decrease the expression of outer membrane proteins OmpX and OmpT, respectively (Vogel and Papenfort, 2006; Rau et al., 2015). However, it is not clear whether this down-regulation occurs at the translational level or through the decay of the mRNA targets (Vogel and Papenfort, 2006). Here, we could not observe a down-expression of ompX and ompT suggesting that base-pairing of both sRNAs with their targets does not affect RNA stability but would essentially interfere with the translation of the outer membrane proteins. OmpT belongs to aspartyl proteases, involved in virulence by protecting cells from cationic antimicrobial peptides, activation of the anticoagulation pathway, and inflammatory responses (Hwang et al., 2007). OmpX mediates adhesion to eukaryotic cells and negatively regulates porins involved in β-lactam uptake like OmpK35 and OmpK36 in Enterobacter aerogenes (Dupont et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2010). Its expression also increases under high osmolarity conditions (Dupont et al., 2004). Inhibition of ompX translation through interaction with CyaR might indirectly increase carbapenem influx in bacterial cells.

Another target of OmrA is the transcriptional regulator CsgD that controls biofilm formation (Mika and Hengge, 2014). In biofilms, bacteria survive as persister cells and become more tolerant to antibiotics. By downregulating csgD and therefore biofilm formation, the expression of OmrA could increase susceptiblity to antimicrobial agents.

csrB and csrC were less expressed in the presence of imipenem. These two sRNA regulate the carbon storage regulator csrA, which activates the expression of several metabolic enzymes involved in energy conversion (Weilbacher et al., 2003). One of the targeted enzymes is the Acetyl CoA synthase (FC = 1.34, p-value = 0.006), which when induced may contribute to fuel the TCA cycle by a secondary pathway.

RybA (also known as MntS) was also an up-regulated small RNA during imipenem exposure. As previously mentioned, RybA transcripts could be implicated in the up-regulation of the plasmid copper resistance operon (see section Imipenem-induced response at the plasmid pBIC1a level).

Conclusions

Taken together, our work showed that imipenem induced an oxidative stress response in E. coli TOP10(pBIC1a) and perturbed several regulatory networks and cellular compounds (Figure 5). In particular, treatment with high concentrations resulted in the activation of the TCA cycle, the electron transport chain pathway and iron metabolism. Few enzymes were induced supposedly to limit the damages caused by oxidative stress, such as detoxification by superoxide dismutase SodA, and protein damage repair by thioredoxins and glutaredoxins (Figure 5). Whereas, the effect on chromosomal genes was highly significant, the impact of imipenem exposure on the transcription of plasmid genes was more limited. However, we could identify few differentially expressed genes that could be involved in resistance to these stressful conditions.

β-lactams are also known to trigger a SOS response in Gram-negative bacilli (Michel, 2005) but activation of the SOS response was not evidenced here. SOS response can be induced when bacteria are exposed to subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics. In this study, high doses of imipenem were used instead to reproduce the effect of antibiotic concentrations reached in human serum. Another explanation might be that SOS response depends on the PBPs targeted by the β-lactam (Miller, 2004). After exposure to ampicillin, PBP3 inhibition causes filamentation and is known to stimulate the DpiAB two-component system, which activates the SOS response (Miller, 2004). At the opposite, imipenem preferentially targets PBP2 (Davies et al., 2008). By targeting preferentially some PBP, β-lactams seem to induce different stress responses.

Dissemination of KPC-encoding plasmids in Gram-negative bacteria poses a serious threat to medical treatment and patient management. To better understand the plasmid biology of a prototypical successful IncFIIK-IncFIB blaKPC−2-carrying plasmid, a transcriptomic analysis was performed in E. coli TOP10, which constituted a well-characterized and annotated model. The choice of the genetic background is an important matter and has probably an impact on the expression of plasmid genes. Given the strong association between IncFIIK plasmids and K. pneumoniae CG258, further studies using K. pneumoniae background are needed to understand the interaction between successful plasmids and successful clones. Here, genes involved in antibiotic resistance and basic plasmid function such as replication were highly expressed in broth culture. Carbapenem exposure did not influence the level of transcription of antimicrobial resistance genes. However, despite high transcription of blaKPC−2 gene, we observed a major impact of imipenem on chromosomal genes and identified adaptive responses of E. coli to imipenem-induced oxidative stress.

Methods

Bacterial transformation

K. pneumoniae BIC-1 is a KPC-producing clinical strain isolated at Bicêtre Hospital in 2009 (Naas et al., 2010). This strain has been entirely sequenced using PacBio and Illumina sequencing (Jousset et al., 2018). The natural IncFIIK-IncFIB plasmid carrying blaKPC−2 gene, named pBIC1a was extracted from the BIC-1 strain by using the Kieser extraction method and subsequently analyzed by electrophoresis on a 0.7% agarose gel (Kieser, 1984). Plasmid pBIC1a was then introduced by electroporation into electrocompetent E. coli TOP10 (Invitrogen, Eragny, France) using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Rad Laboratories. Marnes-la-Coquette, France). The transformant E. coli TOP10-pBIC1a was selected on plates supplemented with ticarcilline 50 mg/L (Sigma-Aldrich). The presence of pBIC1a was verified by PCR and by plasmid extraction followed by electrophoresis on a 0.7% agarose gel.

pBIC1a sequence analysis

Annotation of pBIC1a was performed using PROKKA (Seemann, 2014). Mobile element proteins and insertion sequences were annotated with ISFinder (https://www-is.biotoul.fr/index.php; Siguier et al., 2006). Sequences of plasmids pKPN3 (NC_009649.1), pKpQIL (GU595196.1), pKpQIL-IT (NC_019155.1), pITO6-C07 (LT009688.1), pBK32179 (JX430448) and pGMI16-005-01 (NZ_CP028181.1) were used for genomic comparison. Plasmid alignment was performed using BRIG (Alikhan et al., 2011) and sequence similarity was studied using BLAST software (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). Allelic variant of the replicase genes were analyzed by replicon sequence typing using Plasmid Finder (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/PlasmidFinder/; Carattoli et al., 2014).

Time-kill experiments

Time-kill experiments were performed to evaluate bacterial cell death after 10 min of imipenem exposure. Briefly, 10 ml of a log-phase culture (OD600 at 0.5) of E. coli TOP10-pBIC1a was divided in two tubes of 5 ml. A final concentration of imipenem at 5 μg/ml was added in one tube. After 10 min, 10-fold serial dilutions were performed and 100 μl of diluted cultures were plated on agar plates without antibiotic. All these steps were performed in triplicates. The next day, colony-forming units (CFU) were counted.

RNA isolation and purification

An overnight culture of E. coli TOP10-pBIC1a was diluted 100-fold in fresh BHI broth and allowed to grow to an OD600 of 0.5. The culture was then split and imipenem (Imipenem-Cilastatin, Mylan, USA) was added to one of the cultures at a final concentration of 5 μg/ml. Ten min later, 2 ml of each culture were taken and mixed with RNA protect (Qiagen, Courtaboeuf, France) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Cells were immediately pelleted by a 10 min centrifugation at 5,000 g. Biological triplicates were performed.

RNA was extracted using GeneJet RNA extraction kit (ThermoScientific, ThermoFisher Scientific, Villebon sur Yvette. France). DNAse treatment was performed with the dsDNAse kit (ThermoScientific) according to the manufacturer's protocol. RNA concentration was measured using Qubit RNA BR assay kit (Invitrogen. ThermoFisher Scientific), and RNA quality was evaluated using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer RNA 6000 Nano Kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). RIN >9 were obtained for all the RNA samples. Verification of complete removal of any contaminating DNA was performed via PCR amplification of recA housekeeping gene. A total of 2.5 μg of total RNA was treated with the Ribo-Zero rRNA Removal kit according to the manufacturer's instructions (Illumina, CA, USA) to remove 16S and 23S rRNAs. rRNA removal efficiency was then analyzed via the Bioanalyzer RNA 6000 Nano Kit. Ribodepleted RNA concentration was measured using Qubit™ RNA HS assay kit (Invitrogen).

RNA library and sequencing

cDNA libraries were prepared using the NEBNext® Ultra Directional RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina protocol (New England Biolabs, MA, USA). The quality of the cDNA was validated using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer DNA1000 kit (Agilent Technologies) and quantity was determined with the Qubit dsDNA BR Assay (ThermoFisher Scientific). Sequencing of the library was performed with an Illumina HiSeq 2500 in single-read mode with 50 cycles.

RT-qPCR

Eight up and down-regulated genes were selected and expression levels were analyzed by quantitative RT-PCR to validate the RNA-Seq data. The primers used are listed in Table S6. An input of 100 ng of total RNA, with no contaminating DNA was used. One-step RT–qPCR was performed using One-step RT-PCR kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's protocol, and the reactions were carried out in 96-well plates with CFX96 Real-time PCR System (BioRad, USA). All qRT-PCRs included an initial denaturation step of 30 s at 95°C, 35 cycles of denaturation (95°C/1s), annealing (52°C/5s), and extension (72°C/7s). Expression of each gene was normalized using rpoB, idnT and yiaJ genes as previously described (Zhou et al., 2011). Expression of these genes was not influenced by the presence of imipenem according to the RNA-Seq data. All reactions were carried out in triplicates. The relative abundance of gene transcripts among the imipenem treated group was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001).

RNA-seq data analysis and differential expression analysis

Reads generated from strand-specific RNA-seq experiments were aligned to the genome of E. coli TOP10 genome (CP000948.1) and to that of pBIC1a sequence (CP022574.1) by using the software Bowtie (version 0.12.7) (Langmead et al., 2009). Reads that mapped in more than four different positions on the genome were discarded i.e., reads corresponding to rRNA. RNA-seq data were analyzed as described (Rosinski-Chupin et al., 2015) by using Rsamtools (version 1.26.2), GenomicAlignments (version 1.10.1). GenomicFeatures (version 1.26.4) and DESeq2 (version 1.14.1) and SARTools (Varet et al., 2016) in R 3.3.1. Only adjusted p-values were used and were obtained using the Benjamini–Hochberg correction for false discovery rate (Benjamini and Hochberg, 1995). Read count data were visually assessed using the Artemis genome viewer (Carver et al., 2008). The coverage (expressed as the average density of reads over 500 nucleotide fragments) was computed on each strand of pBICa sequence and visualized by using a heatmap representation (IGV software) (Robinson et al., 2011). The gene expression values were quantified in terms of reads per million (RPKM) defined as the total number of reads mapping to the feature divided by feature length (in kbp) normalized by the total number of reads (in millions) (Mortazavi et al., 2008).

The significantly up- and downregulated genes were analyzed for GO term enrichment separately with PANTHER (http://pantherdb.org/webservices/go/overrep.jsp; Mi et al., 2017) using batch upload, and the significantly enriched terms further explored on the REVIGO web application (http://revigo.irb.hr/) to identify and visualize relationships among the GO terms (Supek et al., 2011). The default settings were used on REVIGO with a list of results of medium size, and E. coli GO terms database used as reference.

The functions of genes and gene regulons were annotated using the following web databases: EcoCyc (http://biocyc.org/ECOLI/organism-summary; Keseler et al., 2017) and RegulonDB v8.2 (http://regulondb.ccg.unam.mx/index.jsp). Regulation for genes in the SoxRS, OxyR, IscR and Fur regulons were identified as annotated in RegulonDB v8.2 (Gama-Castro et al., 2016).

Accession numbers

Plasmid pBIC1a has been deposited in NCBI database under accession number CP022574.1, and RNA-Seq data in Array Express under accession number E-MTAB-7190.

Statements

Author contributions

AJ was in charge of the study design, library preparations, RNA-seq experiments, data analysis, and writing of the manuscript. IRC performed statistical analysis, data analysis and the proofreading of the manuscript. JT realized qRT-PCR and Time kill experiments. RB worked on study design, data analysis and the proofreading of the manuscript. PG and TN were in charge of the study design, and the proofreading of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Assistance Publique—Hôpitaux de Paris, by a grant from the Université Paris-Sud (EA7361), by the LabEx LERMIT supported by a grant from the French National Research Agency (ANR-10-LABX-33), and by a project of ANR LabEx IBEID. This work was also funded in part by a grant from Joint Program Initiative on Antimicrobial Resistance (ANR-14-JAMR-0002).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02929/full#supplementary-material

Figure S1

Time-kill analysis after imipenem exposure. Bacteria were diluted using 10-fold serial dilutions and Colony-Forming Units (CFUs) were counted before (T0) and 10 min after imipenem addition (T10). The percentage of surviving bacteria is represented. The experiments were performed in triplicates.

Figure S2

Differential expression of E. coli (pBIC1a) genes in presence of imipenem (imi). Condition without antibiotic was used as control (Ct). 479 significantly differentially expressed genes were found (p-value < 0.05). (A) Plots of the principal component analysis (PCA). All experiments were performed with biological triplicates. (B) Volcano plot with 325 genes with diminished expression and 154 genes with increased expression in presence of imipenem are specified.

Figure S3

Transcriptional landscape of Tn4401a bracketing blaKPC−2 carbapenemase gene. (A) Strand-oriented read mapping of Tn4401a using Artemis software (Carver et al., 2008). No clear transcription termination of blaKPC−2 transcripts was observed, and this transcription covered in antisense the transposase gene of ISKpn6. CDS and their orientations are indicated by colored arrows in the lower part. The six reading frames are indicated with vertical bars representing stop codon. Green reads represent multiple identical reads merged and black reads represent unique read mapped. (B) Mapping of the reads indicates promoter p2 as the main promoter. Promoters are indicated by black boxes and named according to the literature (Girlich et al., 2017). Inverted repeat right (IRR) of ISKpn7 is indicated by horizontal black arrow.

Figure S4

RT-qPCR validation of eight representative genes with significantly differential expression after imipenem-induced stress. RT-qPCR data are represented as mean ± SD from three biological replicates.

Table S1

Alignment of raw data on E. coli TOP10(pBIC1a) sequence.

Table S2

Differentially expressed genes after imipenem addition in broth culture (5μg/ml).

Table S3

Effet of imipenem on pBIC1a genes.

Table S4

SoxRS/OxyRS/IscR/Fur-regulated gene expression changes.

Table S5

Differentially expressed regulatory RNAs.

Table S6

Primers used for RT-PCR.

References

  • 1

    AlikhanN.-F.PettyN. K.Ben ZakourN. L.BeatsonS. A. (2011). BLAST ring image generator (BRIG): simple prokaryote genome comparisons. BMC Genomics12:402. 10.1186/1471-2164-12-402

  • 2

    AlmeidaC. C.RomãoC. V.LindleyP. F.TeixeiraM.SaraivaL. M. (2006). The role of the hybrid cluster protein in oxidative stress defense. J. Biol. Chem.281, 3244532450. 10.1074/jbc.M605888200

  • 3

    AndrewsS. C.RobinsonA. K.Rodríguez-QuiñonesF. (2003). Bacterial iron homeostasis. FEMS Microbiol. Rev.27, 215237. 10.1016/S0168-6445(03)00055-X

  • 4

    AravindL.AnantharamanV.BalajiS.BabuM. M.IyerL. M. (2005). The many faces of the helix-turn-helix domain: transcription regulation and beyond. FEMS Microbiol. Rev.29, 231262. 10.1016/j.femsre.2004.12.008

  • 5

    AsakuraY.KobayashiI. (2009). From damaged genome to cell surface: transcriptome changes during bacterial cell death triggered by loss of a restriction-modification gene complex. Nucleic Acids Res.37, 30213031. 10.1093/nar/gkp148

  • 6

    BaraniakA.GrabowskaA.IzdebskiR.FiettJ.HerdaM.BojarskaK.et al. (2011). Molecular characteristics of KPC-producing Enterobacteriaceae at the early stage of their dissemination in Poland, 2008–2009. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.55, 54935499. 10.1128/AAC.05118-11

  • 7

    BelenkyP.YeJ. D.PorterC. B. M.CohenN. R.LobritzM. A.FerranteT.et al. (2015). Bactericidal antibiotics induce toxic metabolic perturbations that lead to cellular damage. Cell Rep.13, 968980. 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.09.059

  • 8

    BenjaminiY.HochbergY. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol.57, 289300.

  • 9

    BlanchardJ. L.WholeyW.-Y.ConlonE. M.PomposielloP. J. (2007). Rapid changes in gene expression dynamics in response to superoxide reveal SoxRS-dependent and independent transcriptional networks. PLOS ONE2:e1186. 10.1371/journal.pone.0001186

  • 10

    BondarczukK.Piotrowska-SegetZ. (2013). Molecular basis of active copper resistance mechanisms in Gram-negative bacteria. Cell Biol. Toxicol.29, 397405. 10.1007/s10565-013-9262-1

  • 11

    BonomoR. A.BurdE. M.ConlyJ.LimbagoB. M.PoirelL.SegreJ. A.et al. (2017). Carbapenemase-producing organisms: a global scourge. Clin. Infect. Dis.66, 12901297. 10.1093/cid/cix893

  • 12

    BucknerM. M. C.SawH. T. H.OsagieR. N.McNallyA.RicciV.WandM. E.et al. (2018). Clinically relevant plasmid-host interactions indicate that transcriptional and not genomic modifications ameliorate fitness costs of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-carrying plasmids. MBio9:e02303-17. 10.1128/mBio.02303-17

  • 13

    CarattoliA.ZankariE.García-FernándezA.Voldby LarsenM.LundO.VillaL.et al. (2014). In silico detection and typing of plasmids using PlasmidFinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.58, 38953903. 10.1128/AAC.02412-14

  • 14

    CarverT.BerrimanM.TiveyA.PatelC.BöhmeU.BarrellB. G.et al. (2008). Artemis and ACT: viewing, annotating and comparing sequences stored in a relational database. Bioinformatics24, 26722676. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn529

  • 15

    ChenL.ChavdaK. D.MelanoR. G.JacobsM. R.KollB.HongT.et al. (2014a). Comparative genomic analysis of KPC-encoding pKpQIL-like plasmids and their distribution in New Jersey and New York Hospitals. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.58, 28712877. 10.1128/AAC.00120-14

  • 16

    ChenL.ChavdaK. D.MelanoR. G.JacobsM. R.LeviM. H.BonomoR. A.et al. (2013). Complete sequence of a bla(KPC-2)-harboring IncFII(K1) plasmid from a Klebsiella pneumoniae sequence type 258 strain. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.57, 15421545. 10.1128/AAC.02332-12

  • 17

    ChenL.MathemaB.ChavdaK. D.DeLeoF. R.BonomoR. A.KreiswirthB. N. (2014b). Carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: molecular and genetic decoding. Trends Microbiol.22, 686696. 10.1016/j.tim.2014.09.003

  • 18

    CheruvankyA.StoesserN.SheppardA. E.CrookD. W.HoffmanP. S.WeddleE.et al. (2017). Enhanced Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase expression from a novel Tn4401 deletion. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.61:e00025-17. 10.1128/AAC.00025-17

  • 19

    CheungK. J.BadarinarayanaV.SelingerD. W.JanseD.ChurchG. M. (2003). A microarray-based antibiotic screen identifies a regulatory role for supercoiling in the osmotic stress response of Escherichia coli. Genome Res.13, 206215. 10.1101/gr.401003

  • 20

    ChillappagariS.SeubertA.TripH.KuipersO. P.MarahielM. A.MiethkeM. (2010). Copper stress affects iron homeostasis by destabilizing iron-sulfur cluster formation in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol.192, 25122524. 10.1128/JB.00058-10

  • 21

    CuzonG.NaasT.CorreaA.QuinnJ. P.VillegasM.-V.NordmannP. (2013). Dissemination of the KPC-2 carbapenemase in non-Klebsiella pneumoniae enterobacterial isolates from Colombia. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents42, 5962. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2013.04.002

  • 22

    CuzonG.NaasT.VillegasM.-V.CorreaA.QuinnJ. P.NordmannP. (2011). Wide dissemination of pseudomonas aeruginosa producing lactamase blaKPC-2 gene in Colombia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.55, 53505353. 10.1128/AAC.00297-11

  • 23

    DaikosG. L.MarkogiannakisA. (2011). Carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: (when) might we still consider treating with carbapenems?Clin. Microbiol. Infect.17, 11351141. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03553.x

  • 24

    DaikosG. L.TsaousiS.TzouvelekisL. S.AnyfantisI.PsichogiouM.ArgyropoulouA.et al. (2014). Carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections: lowering mortality by antibiotic combination schemes and the role of carbapenems. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.58, 23222328. 10.1128/AAC.02166-13

  • 25

    DaviesT. A.ShangW.BushK.FlammR. K. (2008). Affinity of doripenem and comparators to penicillin-binding proteins in Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.52, 15101512. 10.1128/AAC.01529-07

  • 26

    DeleoF. R.ChenL.PorcellaS. F.MartensC. A.KobayashiS. D.PorterA. R.et al. (2014). Molecular dissection of the evolution of carbapenem-resistant multilocus sequence type 258 Klebsiella pneumoniae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.111, 49884993. 10.1073/pnas.1321364111

  • 27

    DoumithM.FindlayJ.HiraniH.HopkinsK. L.LivermoreD. M.DodgsonA.et al. (2017). Major role of pKpQIL-like plasmids in the early dissemination of KPC-type carbapenemases in the UK. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.72, 22412248. 10.1093/jac/dkx141

  • 28

    DupontM.E.CholletR.ChevalierJ.PagèsJ.-M. (2004). Enterobacter aerogenes OmpX, a cation-selective channel mar- and osmo-regulated. FEBS Lett.569, 2730. 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.05.047

  • 29

    DwyerD. J.BelenkyP. A.YangJ. H.MacDonaldI. C.MartellJ. D.TakahashiN.et al. (2014). Antibiotics induce redox-related physiological alterations as part of their lethality. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.111, E2100E2109. 10.1073/pnas.1401876111

  • 30

    FeldenB.CattoirV. (2018). Bacterial adaptation to antibiotics through regulatory RNAs. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.62:e02503-17. 10.1128/AAC.02503-17

  • 31

    FinleyP. J.NortonR.AustinC.MitchellA.ZankS.DurhamP. (2015). Unprecedented silver resistance in clinically isolated enterobacteriaceae: major implications for burn and wound management. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.59, 47344741. 10.1128/AAC.00026-15

  • 32

    Gama-CastroS.SalgadoH.Santos-ZavaletaA.Ledezma-TejeidaD.Muñiz-RascadoL.García-SoteloJ. S.et al. (2016). RegulonDB version 9.0: high-level integration of gene regulation, coexpression, motif clustering and beyond. Nucleic Acids Res.44, D133D143. 10.1093/nar/gkv1156

  • 33

    García-FernándezA.VillaL.CartaC.VendittiC.GiordanoA.VendittiM.et al. (2012). Klebsiella pneumoniae ST258 producing KPC-3 identified in italy carries novel plasmids and OmpK36/OmpK35 porin variants. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.56, 21432145. 10.1128/AAC.05308-11

  • 34

    GerstleK.KlätschkeK.HahnU.PiganeauN. (2012). The small RNA RybA regulates key-genes in the biosynthesis of aromatic amino acids under peroxide stress in E. coli. RNA Biol.9, 458468. 10.4161/rna.19065

  • 35

    GirlichD.BonninR. A.JoussetA.NaasT. (2017). Promoter characterization and expression of the blaKPC-2 gene in Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.72, 15971601. 10.1093/jac/dkx044

  • 36

    GottesmanS.StoutV. (1991). Regulation of capsular polysaccharide synthesis in Escherichia coli K12. Mol. Microbiol.5, 15991606.

  • 37

    HemmM. R.PaulB. J.Miranda-RíosJ.ZhangA.SoltanzadN.StorzG. (2010). Small stress response proteins in Escherichia coli: proteins missed by classical proteomic studies. J. Bacteriol.192, 4658. 10.1128/JB.00872-09

  • 38

    Hidalgo-GrassC.WarburgG.TemperV.BenensonS.MosesA. E.BlockC.et al. (2012). KPC-9, a novel carbapenemase from clinical specimens in Israel. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.56, 60576059. 10.1128/AAC.01156-12

  • 39

    HwangB.-Y.VaradarajanN.LiH.RodriguezS.IversonB. L.GeorgiouG. (2007). Substrate specificity of the Escherichia coli outer membrane protease OmpP. J. Bacteriol.189, 522530. 10.1128/JB.01493-06

  • 40

    JoussetA. B.BonninR. A.Rosinski-ChupinI.GirlichD.CuzonG.CabanelN.et al. (2018). 4.5 years within-patient evolution of a colistin resistant KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae ST258. Clin. Infect. Dis.67, 13881394. 10.1093/cid/ciy293

  • 41

    KaldaluN.MeiR.LewisK. (2004). Killing by ampicillin and ofloxacin induces overlapping changes in Escherichia coli transcription profile. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.48, 890896. 10.1128/AAC.48.3.890-896.2004

  • 42

    KeselerI. M.MackieA.Santos-ZavaletaA.BillingtonR.Bonavides-MartínezC.CaspiR.et al. (2017). The EcoCyc database: reflecting new knowledge about Escherichia coli K-12. Nucleic Acids Res.45, D543D550. 10.1093/nar/gkw1003

  • 43

    KieserT. (1984). Factors affecting the isolation of CCC DNA from Streptomyces lividans and Escherichia coli. Plasmid12, 1936. 10.1016/0147-619X(84)90063-5

  • 44

    KimJ.-S.KimY. J.SeoS.SeongM.-J.LeeK. (2015). Functional role of bdm during flagella biogenesis in Escherichia coli. Curr. Microbiol.70, 369373. 10.1007/s00284-014-0729-y

  • 45

    KimK.KimK.-P.ChoiJ.LimJ.-A.LeeJ.HwangS.et al. (2010). Outer membrane proteins A (OmpA) and X (OmpX) are essential for basolateral invasion of Cronobacter sakazakii. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.76, 51885198. 10.1128/AEM.02498-09

  • 46

    KohanskiM. A.DwyerD. J.CollinsJ. J. (2010). How antibiotics kill bacteria: from targets to networks. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.8, 423435. 10.1038/nrmicro2333

  • 47

    KohanskiM. A.DwyerD. J.HayeteB.LawrenceC. A.CollinsJ. J. (2007). A common mechanism of cellular death induced by bactericidal antibiotics. Cell130, 797810. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.06.049

  • 48

    LandmanD.UrbanC.BäckerM.KellyP.ShahN.BabuE.et al. (2010). Susceptibility profiles, molecular epidemiology, and detection of KPC-producing Escherichia coli isolates from the New York City vicinity. J. Clin. Microbiol.48, 46044607. 10.1128/JCM.01143-10

  • 49

    LangK. S.DanzeisenJ. L.XuW.JohnsonT. J. (2012). Transcriptome mapping of pAR060302, a blaCMY-2-positive broad-host-range IncA/C plasmid. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.78, 33793386. 10.1128/AEM.07199-11

  • 50

    LangmeadB.TrapnellC.PopM.SalzbergS. L. (2009). Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol.10:R25. 10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25

  • 51

    LauA. F.WangH.WeingartenR. A.DrakeS. K.SuffrediniA. F.GarfieldM. K.et al. (2014). A rapid matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry-based method for single-plasmid tracking in an outbreak of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. J. Clin. Microbiol.52, 28042812. 10.1128/JCM.00694-14

  • 52

    LaubacherM. E.AdesS. E. (2008). The Rcs phosphorelay is a cell envelope stress response activated by peptidoglycan stress and contributes to intrinsic antibiotic resistance. J. Bacteriol.190, 20652074. 10.1128/JB.01740-07

  • 53

    LeeG. C.BurgessD. S. (2012). Treatment of Klebsiella Pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) infections: a review of published case series and case reports. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob.11:32. 10.1186/1476-0711-11-32

  • 54

    LivakK. J.SchmittgenT. D. (2001). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods25, 402408. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262

  • 55

    LushchakV. I. (2011). Adaptive response to oxidative stress: bacteria, fungi, plants and animals. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Toxicol. Pharmacol.153, 175190. 10.1016/j.cbpc.2010.10.004

  • 56

    MajdalaniN.GottesmanS. (2005). The Rcs phosphorelay: a complex signal transduction system. Annu. Rev. Microbiol.59, 379405. 10.1146/annurev.micro.59.050405.101230

  • 57

    MiH.HuangX.MuruganujanA.TangH.MillsC.KangD.et al. (2017). PANTHER version 11: expanded annotation data from gene ontology and reactome pathways, and data analysis tool enhancements. Nucleic Acids Res.45, D183D189. 10.1093/nar/gkw1138

  • 58

    MichelB. (2005). After 30 years of study, the bacterial SOS response still surprises us. PLoS Biol.3:e255. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030255

  • 59

    MikaF.HenggeR. (2014). Small RNAs in the control of RpoS, CsgD, and biofilm architecture of Escherichia coli. RNA Biol.11, 494507. 10.4161/rna.28867

  • 60

    MillerC. (2004). SOS response induction by lactams and bacterial defense against antibiotic lethality. Science305, 16291631. 10.1126/science.1101630

  • 61

    MortazaviA.WilliamsB. A.McCueK.SchaefferL.WoldB. (2008). Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq. Nat. Methods5, 621628. 10.1038/nmeth.1226

  • 62

    NaasT.CuzonG.BabicsA.FortineauN.BoytchevI.GayralF.et al. (2010). Endoscopy-associated transmission of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae producing KPC-2 β-lactamase. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.65, 13051306. 10.1093/jac/dkq117

  • 63

    NaasT.CuzonG.TruongH.-V.NordmannP. (2012). Role of ISKpn7 and deletions in blaKPC gene expression. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.56, 47534759. 10.1128/AAC.00334-12

  • 64

    NagyZ.ChandlerM. (2004). Regulation of transposition in bacteria. Res. Microbiol.155, 387398. 10.1016/j.resmic.2004.01.008

  • 65

    Navon-VeneziaS.KondratyevaK.CarattoliA. (2017). Klebsiella pneumoniae: a major worldwide source and shuttle for antibiotic resistance. FEMS Microbiol. Rev.41, 252275. 10.1093/femsre/fux013

  • 66

    PapagiannitsisC. C.PilatoV. D.GianiT.GiakkoupiP.RiccobonoE.LandiniG.et al. (2016). Characterization of KPC-encoding plasmids from two endemic settings, Greece and Italy. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.71, 28242830. 10.1093/jac/dkw227

  • 67

    PartridgeS. R. (2014). Tn4401 carrying blaKPC is inserted within another insertion in pKpQIL and related plasmids. J. Clin. Microbiol.52, 44484449. 10.1128/JCM.02426-14

  • 68

    PyB.BarrasF. (2010). Building Fe–S proteins: bacterial strategies. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.8, 436446. 10.1038/nrmicro2356

  • 69

    RademacherC.MasepohlB. (2012). Copper-responsive gene regulation in bacteria. Microbiology158, 24512464. 10.1099/mic.0.058487-0

  • 70

    RauM. H.BojanovičK.NielsenA. T.LongK. S. (2015). Differential expression of small RNAs under chemical stress and fed-batch fermentation in E. coli. BMC Genomics16:1051. 10.1186/s12864-015-2231-8

  • 71

    RenS.LiQ.XieL.XieJ. (2017). Molecular mechanisms underlying the function diversity of ArsR family metalloregulator. Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Expr.27, 1935. 10.1615/CritRevEukaryotGeneExpr.2016018476

  • 72

    RobinsonJ. T.ThorvaldsdóttirH.WincklerW.GuttmanM.LanderE. S.GetzG.et al. (2011). Integrative genomics viewer. Nat. Biotechnol.29, 2426. 10.1038/nbt.1754

  • 73

    RojasL. J.SalimM.CoberE.RichterS. S.PerezF.SalataR. A.et al. (2017). Colistin resistance in carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: laboratory detection and impact on mortality. Clin. Infect. Dis.64, 711718. 10.1093/cid/ciw805

  • 74

    RojasL. J.WeinstockG. M.De La CadenaE.DiazL.RiosR.HansonB. M.et al. (2018). An analysis of the epidemic of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae: convergence of two evolutionary mechanisms creates the “Perfect Storm.”J. Infect. Dis.217, 8292. 10.1093/infdis/jix524

  • 75

    Rosinski-ChupinI.SauvageE.SismeiroO.VillainA.Da CunhaV.CaliotM.-E.et al. (2015). Single nucleotide resolution RNA-seq uncovers new regulatory mechanisms in the opportunistic pathogen Streptococcus agalactiae. BMC Genomics16:419. 10.1186/s12864-015-1583-4

  • 76

    RothA. L.KurpielP. M.ListerP. D.HansonN. D. (2011). blaKPC RNA expression correlates with two transcriptional start sites but not always with gene copy number in four genera of gram-negative pathogens. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.55, 39363938. 10.1128/AAC.01509-10

  • 77

    Ruiz de los MozosI.Vergara-IrigarayM.SeguraV.VillanuevaM.BitarteN.SaramagoM.et al. (2013). Base pairing interaction between 5′- and 3′-UTRs controls icaR mRNA translation in Staphylococcus aureus. PLoS Genet.9:e1004001. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004001

  • 78

    SeemannT. (2014). Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics30, 20682069. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153

  • 79

    SeoS. W.KimD.SzubinR.PalssonB. O. (2015). Genome-wide reconstruction of OxyR and SoxRS transcriptional regulatory networks under oxidative stress in Escherichia coli K-12 MG1655. Cell Rep.12, 12891299. 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.07.043

  • 80

    SignsS. A.TanJ. S.SalstromS. J.FileT. M. (1992). Pharmacokinetics of imipenem in serum and skin window fluid in healthy adults after intramuscular or intravenous administration. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.36, 14001403.

  • 81

    SiguierP.PerochonJ.LestradeL.MahillonJ.ChandlerM. (2006). ISfinder: the reference centre for bacterial insertion sequences. Nucleic Acids Res.34, D32D36. 10.1093/nar/gkj014

  • 82

    SimS.-H.YeomJ.-H.ShinC.SongW.-S.ShinE.KimH.-M.et al. (2010). Escherichia coli ribonuclease III activity is downregulated by osmotic stress: consequences for the degradation of bdm mRNA in biofilm formation. Mol. Microbiol.75, 413425. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06986.x

  • 83

    SinglasE. (1990). Clinical pharmacokinetics of an imipenem-cilastatin combination. Presse Med.19, 598605.

  • 84

    SupekF.BošnjakM.ŠkuncaN.ŠmucT. (2011). REVIGO summarizes and visualizes long lists of gene ontology terms. PLoS ONE6:e21800. 10.1371/journal.pone.0021800

  • 85

    TumbarelloM.VialeP.ViscoliC.TrecarichiE. M.TumiettoF.MarcheseA.et al. (2012). Predictors of mortality in bloodstream infections caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae: importance of combination therapy. Clin. Infect. Dis.55, 943950. 10.1093/cid/cis588

  • 86

    UeharaT.DinhT.BernhardtT. G. (2009). LytM-domain factors are required for daughter cell separation and rapid ampicillin-induced lysis in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol.191, 50945107. 10.1128/JB.00505-09

  • 87

    van DuinD.LokJ. J.EarleyM.CoberE.RichterS. S.PerezF.et al. (2017). Colistin vs. Ceftazidime-avibactam in the treatment of infections due to carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae. Clin. Infect. Dis.66, 163171. 10.1093/cid/cix783

  • 88

    VaretH.Brillet-GuéguenL.CoppéeJ.-Y.DilliesM.-A. (2016). SARTools: a DESeq2- and EdgeR-based R pipeline for comprehensive differential analysis of RNA-SEQ data. PLOS ONE11:e0157022. 10.1371/journal.pone.0157022

  • 89

    VillaL.García-FernándezA.FortiniD.CarattoliA. (2010). Replicon sequence typing of IncF plasmids carrying virulence and resistance determinants. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.65, 25182529. 10.1093/jac/dkq347

  • 90

    VisweswaranG. R. R.SteenA.LeenhoutsK.SzeligaM.RubanB.Hesseling-MeindersA.et al. (2013). AcmD, a homolog of the major autolysin AcmA of Lactococcus lactis, binds to the cell wall and contributes to cell separation and autolysis. PLoS ONE8:e72167. 10.1371/journal.pone.0072167

  • 91

    VogelJ.PapenfortK. (2006). Small non-coding RNAs and the bacterial outer membrane. Curr. Opin. Microbiol.9, 605611. 10.1016/j.mib.2006.10.006

  • 92

    WeberH.PolenT.HeuvelingJ.WendischV. F.HenggeR. (2005). Genome-wide analysis of the general stress response network in Escherichia coli: σS-dependent genes, promoters, and sigma factor selectivity. J. Bacteriol.187, 15911603. 10.1128/JB.187.5.1591-1603.2005

  • 93

    WeilbacherT.SuzukiK.DubeyA. K.WangX.GudapatyS.MorozovI.et al. (2003). A novel sRNA component of the carbon storage regulatory system of Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol.48, 657670. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03459.x

  • 94

    WeisenbergS. A.MorganD. J.Espinal-WitterR.LaroneD. H. (2009). Clinical outcomes of patients with Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae after treatment with imipenem or meropenem. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.64, 233235. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2009.02.004

  • 95

    WolfeM. T.HeoJ.GaravelliJ. S.LuddenP. W. (2002). Hydroxylamine reductase activity of the hybrid cluster protein from Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol.184, 58985902. 10.1128/JB.184.21.5898-5902.2002

  • 96

    WrightM. S.PerezF.BrinkacL.JacobsM. R.KayeK.CoberE.et al. (2014). Population structure of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from midwestern U.S. Hospitals. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.58, 49614965. 10.1128/AAC.00125-14

  • 97

    XiaoM.LaiY.SunJ.ChenG.YanA. (2016). Transcriptional regulation of the outer membrane porin gene ompW reveals its physiological role during the transition from the aerobic to the anaerobic lifestyle of Escherichia coli. Front. Microbiol.7:799. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00799

  • 98

    XiaoM.ZhuX.FanF.XuH.TangJ.QinY.et al. (2017). Osmotolerance in Escherichia coli is improved by activation of copper efflux genes or supplementation with sulfur-containing amino acids. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.83:e03050-16. 10.1128/AEM.03050-16

  • 99

    ZhengM.WangX.TempletonL. J.SmulskiD. R.LaRossaR. A.StorzG. (2001). DNA microarray-mediated transcriptional profiling of the Escherichia coli response to hydrogen peroxide. J. Bacteriol.183, 45624570. 10.1128/JB.183.15.4562-4570.2001

  • 100

    ZhouK.ZhouL.LimQ. 'EnZouR.StephanopoulosG.TooH.-P. (2011). Novel reference genes for quantifying transcriptional responses of Escherichia coli to protein overexpression by quantitative PCR. BMC Mol. Biol.12:18. 10.1186/1471-2199-12-18

Summary

Keywords

carbapenemase, KPC-producing plasmids, transcriptome, RNA-seq, oxidative-stress

Citation

Jousset AB, Rosinski-Chupin I, Takissian J, Glaser P, Bonnin RA and Naas T (2018) Transcriptional Landscape of a blaKPC-2 Plasmid and Response to Imipenem Exposure in Escherichia coli TOP10. Front. Microbiol. 9:2929. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02929

Received

19 September 2018

Accepted

14 November 2018

Published

03 December 2018

Volume

9 - 2018

Edited by

Raffaele Zarrilli, Department of Public Health, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Italy

Reviewed by

Vincenzo Di Pilato, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Italy; Eliana De Gregorio, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Italy

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Rémy A. Bonnin Thierry Naas

This article was submitted to Antimicrobials, Resistance and Chemotherapy, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics