Abstract
Festuca rubra subsp. pruinosa is a perennial grass that inhabits sea cliffs of the Atlantic coasts of Europe. In this unhospitable environment plants grow in rock crevices and are exposed to abiotic stress factors such as low nutrient availability, wind, and salinity. Festuca rubra subsp. pruinosa is a host of the fungal endophyte Epichloƫ festucae, which colonizes aerial organs, but its root mycobiota is unknown. The culturable endophytic mycobiota of FRP roots was surveyed in a set of 105 plants sampled at five populations in marine cliffs from the northern coast of Spain. In total, 135 different fungal taxa were identified, 17 of them occurred in more than 10% of plants and in two or more populations. Seven taxa belonging to Fusarium, Diaporthe, Helotiales, Drechslera, Slopeiomyces, and Penicillium appeared to be constituents of the core microbiome of Festuca rubra subsp. pruinosa roots because they occurred in more than 20% of the plants analyzed, and at three or more populations. Most fungal strains analyzed (71.8%) were halotolerant. The presence of Epichloƫ festucae in aboveground tissue was detected in 65.7% of the plants, but its presence did not seem to significantly affect the structure of the core or other root microbiota, when compared to that of plants free of this endophyte. When plants of the grass Lolium perenne were inoculated with fungal strains obtained from Festuca rubra subsp. pruinosa roots, a Diaporthe strain significantly promoted leaf biomass production under normal and saline (200 mM NaCl) watering regimes. These results suggest that the core mycobiome of Festuca rubra subsp. pruinosa could have a role in host plant adaptation, and might be useful for the improvement of agricultural grasses.
Introduction
The vegetation that inhabits coastal marine cliffs is adapted to environmental conditions that are far from optimal for plant growth and survival. The rock substrate and vertical cliffs makes soil scarce or non-existent. Sea water spray adds salinity to the scenario, and exposure to sea winds favor plant dehydration. Those conditions of low nutrient availability, salinity, and wind exposure can be persistent in sea cliffs, and as a result, sea cliff vegetation is often endemic, reflecting habitat specialization in order to survive under these unhospitable conditions (Doody, 2001; López-Bedoya and Pérez-Alberti, 2009).
Festuca rubra subsp. pruinosa (FRP) is a plant species common in cliffs of the Atlantic coasts of Europe (Markgraf-Dannenberg, 1980; López-Bedoya and PĆ©rez-Alberti, 2009). This perennial grass grows as a chasmophyte in rock fissures, or in very shallow soils formed on cliff cavities and slopes. In nature this species rarely occurs away from sea cliffs, where other vegetation predominates, and its salt tolerance is greater than that of other F. rubra subspecies adapted to inland habitats (Humpreys, 1982). Some anatomical characteristics might contribute to the adaptation to cliffs of this plant, for instance, the epithet pruinosa refers to the apparent epicuticular wax coat that covers its leaves, possibly having a role in preventing water loss (OrtuƱez and de la Fuente, 2010; MartĆnez Sagarra et al., 2017).
In addition to traits inherent to the plant genome, the plant microbiome can also contribute to adaptation. Studies of some plants adapted to high stress habitats revealed that fungal endophytes confer habitat-specific stress tolerance to their hosts, and without these fungal endophytes plant adaptation is reduced in their native habitats (Rodriguez and Redman, 2008). Examples include improved tolerance to biotic and abiotic stress factors such as disease, herbivory, heat, or salinity mediated by endophytic fungi (Clay and Schardl, 2002; Waller et al., 2005; Rodriguez et al., 2008). Some of the endophytes reported in these studies conferred improved stress tolerance to new host species, highlighting the importance that endophytic fungi could have for the improvement of agricultural crops.
Like other subspecies of Festuca rubra, FRP plants maintain associations with the fungal endophyte Epichloƫ festucae. This fungus systemically colonizes the stems and leaves of host plants, but not the roots, and it is transmitted vertically to seeds (Leuchtmann et al., 1994; Zabalgogeazcoa et al., 2006). Endophytic Epichloƫ species can have a mutualistic relationship with their hosts, and increased tolerance of symbiotic plants to biotic and abiotic stress factors have been reported to occur in some situations. For example, Epichloƫ festucae can produce several types of alkaloids that might protect host plants against herbivores (Clay and Schardl, 2002).
In marine cliffs the roots of FRP plants grow in rock fissures or minimal soil, forming a compact fibrous system which holds the plant and captures nutrients. The root mycobiota of FRP is unknown, and some of its components could be useful for the improvement of other plant species of agronomic interest, as it has been demonstrated in other plant-endophyte associations (Rodriguez et al., 2008). Thus, the objectives of this work were: (1) to identify the culturable endophytic mycobiota of FRP roots, (2) to determine if the presence of Epichloƫ affects the structure of the root mycobiota, and (3) to test if some FRP root endophytes affect the performance of another grass, Lolium perenne, when exposed to salinity.
Materials and Methods
Study Sites and Plant Sampling
Plants of Festuca rubra subsp. pruinosa (FRP) were collected at five locations in sea cliffs in the North Atlantic coast of Spain. Three locations were in Galicia: Torre de HĆ©rcules (TDH), 43°23ā²09ā²ā²N 8°24ā²23ā²ā²W, Cedeira (CED), 43°40ā²46ā²ā²N 8°01ā²15ā²ā²W, and Estaca de Bares (EDB), 43°47ā²25ā²ā²N 7°41ā²16ā²ā²W, and two in Asturias: San Pedro de la Rivera (SPR), 43°34ā²43ā²ā²N 6°13ā²17ā²ā²W, and Cabo de PeƱas (CDP), 43°39ā²02ā²ā²N 5°51ā²00ā²ā²W. The shortest distance in straight line among these locations is 30 km. The predominant flora in the walls of these sea cliffs mainly consisted of Festuca rubra subsp. pruinosa, Armeria spp. and Crithmum maritimum. The climate in the coast of Galicia and Asturias is mild with oceanic influence and abundant rainfall spread over the year; during the 1981ā2010 period the mean annual precipitation was 1106 and 1062 mm, and the average annual temperature 13.5 and 13.8°C in Galicia and Asturias, respectively (AEMET, 2012). In the spring of 2016, a total of 105 FRP plants, about 20 plants per location, were collected. Most plants grew in fissures in the rock, where soil was very scarce or absent. The plants were transported in a refrigerated cooler to the laboratory in Salamanca, and processed for the isolation of fungi from roots the day after they were sampled. Afterward the plants were transplanted to pots with a 1:1 (v:v) mixture of peat and perlite and maintained in a wirehouse outdoors.
Isolation of Fungi
To isolate fungi from roots, a sample of about 20 root fragments of 4ā5 cm was collected from each plant. Each root sample was surface-disinfected with a solution of 20% commercial bleach (1% active chlorine) containing 0.02% Tween 80 (v:v) for 6 min, followed by treatment with an aqueous solution of 70% ethanol for 30 s. Finally, the roots were rinsed with sterile water and cut into pieces about 5 mm long. Thirty root pieces of each sample were plated in two Petri plates (15 pieces/plate) with potato dextrose agar (PDA) containing 200 mg/L of chloramphenicol. This antibiotic was used to exclude the isolation of endophytic bacteria. A root sample of each of the 105 plants was prepared as outlined above, and kept in the dark at room temperature. As mycelium emerged from a root fragment into the agar, a small piece of the mycelium from the leading edge of the colony was transferred to a new PDA plate and maintained at room temperature. The root fragment and remaining mycelium were taken out of the original plate to avoid overgrowth. The plates with root samples were checked daily for the presence of fungi for about 4 weeks.
The presence of EpichloĆ« festucae on each plant was diagnosed by isolation. Several leaf sheaths were collected from each plant, cut into fragments about 5 mm long, and surface disinfected by immersion in a solution of 20% commercial bleach for 10 min. The fragments were then rinsed with sterile water, and about 15 fragments from each plant were placed in a PDA plate containing 200 mg/L of chloramphenicol. The plates were kept at room temperature, and fungi emerging from leaf fragments during the first 2ā5 days were discarded together with its leaf sheath fragment. White EpichloĆ« mycelium emerging from the extremes of the leaf fragments about 1 week after plating was transferred to new PDA plates for further identification.
Identification of Fungi
The fungal isolates obtained from roots were first grouped into different morphotypes according to morphological characteristics such as colony color, exudate production, mycelium appearance, and growth rate. One or a few isolates of each morphotype were used for further classification based on rDNA nucleotide sequences. Fungal DNA was extracted from a small amount of mycelium scraped from a PDA culture using the Phire Plant Direct PCR Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). A ribosomal DNA region including the internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1), 5.8S rDNA, and ITS2 was amplified by PCR using primers ITS1 and ITS4 (White et al., 1990). Amplification conditions were: 98°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 98°C for 5 s, 54°C for 5 s, and 72°C for 20 s; after that the reaction was kept at 72°C for 1 min. PCR amplicons were cleaned (MSB Spin PCRapace, Stratec biomedical, Germany) and sequenced at the DNA sequencing service of the University of Salamanca (Spain).
All the sequences obtained were grouped into operational taxonomic units (OTU), considering that groups of sequences with a similarity greater than 97% belonged to the same OTU. This clustering operation was done using BlastClust software (NCBI, 2004). Afterward, a sequence representative of each OTU was used to search for similar curated sequences at the UNITE fungal database. A taxonomic identity was assigned to each OTU considering that the species rank of a UNITE database match was accepted when the identity between the OTU and database sequences was greater than 97%, and most UNITE matches corresponded to the same taxon. When the similarity was 97% ā 95%, or UNITE matches corresponded to several species of the same genus, only the genus rank was accepted. In other cases the sequences were assigned to orders or families whenever it was reasonable.
Analysis of Root Fungal Diversity
For each location (referred to as population from here on), species accumulation curves showing the relationship between the number of plants sampled and the number of fungal species obtained, were estimated using the āspecaccumā function and the exact method with the Vegan Package in R (Oksanen et al., 2017). Estimations of the maximum number of fungal species at each population were obtained with the Bootstrap and Chao indexes using EstimateS 9.0 software (Colwell, 2005). Shannonās index of diversity (Hā) was estimated from the relative abundance of each taxon identified. The distribution of the relative abundance of the fungal species was observed with a rank-abundance curve. The similarity of fungal communities between each pair of populations was estimated using Jaccardās index of similarity (J). It is calculated from the equation J = c/(a + b + c), where ācā is the number of fungal taxa shared between two populations, āaā the number of fungal taxa unique to the first population and ābā the number of fungal taxa unique to the second population (Jaccard, 1912).
Effect of Epichloƫ on Root Mycobiota
Species richness (number of different root endophyte species per plant) was analyzed with a two-way ANOVA with Epichloƫ presence (E+) or absence (E-) and plant population (CED, CDP, EDB, SPR, and TDH) as factors. A type III sum of squares was used because the number of E+ and E- plants was unbalanced.
Species accumulation curves and beta diversity index estimations, plus a Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) were made using the Vegan Package in R (Oksanen et al., 2017). Species accumulation curves for E+ and E- plants were estimated using the āspecaccumā function and the exact method. Beta-diversity indexes were estimated using the ābetadiverā function and the z index based on the Arrhenius species-area model (Koleff et al., 2003). Differences in beta diversity among groups were determined by Tukey multiple comparisons. A CCA was made because the gradient length of the detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) was greater than four, which indicated an unimodal response (LepÅ” and Å milauer, 2003). Taxa appearing in less than three plants were omitted for this analysis; as a result, 61 taxa remained. A forward selection procedure (ordistep function) was used to determine the subset of explanatory variables (EpichloĆ« incidence, population, EpichloĆ«: population) explaining most variation in root mycobiome. The statistical power of the analysis was assessed by Monte Carlo permutation tests (n = 999).
Salt Tolerance of Fungal Isolates
A set of 46 fungal strains belonging to 20 of the most abundant genera isolated from FRP roots plus nine EpichloĆ« festucae strains were analyzed to determine their salt tolerance in vitro. For each fungal strain a 6 mm diameter mycelial disk was placed in the center of 9 cm Petri plates with PDA containing three different concentrations of sodium chloride: 600 mM (equivalent to sea water concentration), 300 mM, and a control without NaCl. For each fungal strain and salt treatment three replicate plates were prepared. All plates were incubated at room temperature in the dark. The colony diameter was measured at two perpendicular axes when colonies in the fastest growing medium reached a diameter of 4ā6 cm. The effect of salinity treatments on the radial growth of fungal colonies was assessed by means of a one-way ANOVA, and statistical significance of differences among means using Tukeyās test (p < 0.05).
Extracellular Enzyme Activity
In vitro cellulase and amylase activity was analyzed for 43 strains belonging to some of the most abundant taxa. The production of cellulase was assayed using the method described by Sunitha et al. (2013) adapted to PDA plates. For each fungal strain a 6 mm diameter mycelial disk was placed in the center of a 9 cm. Petri plate and incubated for 5 days at 25°± 1°C in the dark. After incubation the plates were flooded with 0.2% (w/v) aqueous Congo Red, and distained with 1 M NaCl for 15 min. The presence of a clear zone surrounding the colony indicated cellulase activity. Amylase activity was assessed on PDA containing 2% (w/v) soluble starch. After incubation the plates were flooded for 15 min with a solution of 1% (w/v) iodine in 2% (w/v) potassium iodide. A clear zone surrounding the colony indicated amylase activity (Hankin and Anagnostakis, 1975).
Inoculation of Lolium perenne Plants With Root Endophytes From FRP
To test whether FRP endophytes affect the growth of the grass Lolium perenne under salinity, plants were inoculated with three fungal strains belonging to some of the core taxa from FRP roots. A greenhouse experiment was conducted with a completely randomized design with 14 plant replicates for each fungal strain (Periconia S6, Penicillium E7, and Diaporthe S69) and salinity treatment (0 and 200 mM NaCl). Seeds of Lolium perenne cv. Tivoli (DLF, Denmark) were sown in 200 mL plastic pots filled with a substrate composed of seven parts of peat and perlite (1:1) previously sterilized at 80°C for 24 h, mixed with one part (v:v) of fungal inoculum. The fungal inoculum was a 4 week old culture of each fungus grown in autoclaved sugar beet pulp. Several seeds were sown in each pot, and thinned to four seedlings after emergence. Three weeks after germination, plants were watered with 0 or 200 mM NaCl during 3 weeks. Plants subject to the salinity treatment were watered with 50 and 100 mM NaCl on the first and third day respectively to avoid salt shock, and the 200 mM concentration was applied from day 5 onward. After 3 weeks of salt treatment the plants were harvested.
Five replicates of each treatment (salt and fungal strain) were analyzed for K and Na concentration by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES, Varian 720-ES). Previously, dried plant samples were calcined at 450°C for 8 h, and ashes dissolved in HCl:HNO3:H2O (1:1:8).
A two-way ANOVA was made to determine the effects of salt treatment and fungal strain on shoot biomass, K and Na concentrations, and differences between means were assessed using Tukeyās test (p < 0.05). The success of the inoculation was determined after harvest by the reisolation of the inoculated fungi from surface disinfected roots, using the method above explained.
Results
Endophyte Isolation
After plating 3150 root fragments on culture media, a total of 2324 fungal isolates were obtained, ranging from 355 to 578 among populations (Table 1). Most isolates emerged in the first 5 days after the placement of the roots on plates. Isolates were obtained from 73.8% of the root fragments plated. All sampled plants harbored fungi in their roots, and on average, 21 isolates were obtained from the roots of each plant.
Table 1
| Population | Number of plants analyzed | Incidence of Epichloƫ festucae (%) | Root mycobiota | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of isolates obtained | Colonization1 | Number of fungal species | Fungal species per plant | |||
| TDH | 21 | 57.1 | 471 | 74.8 | 34 | 1.62 |
| CED | 19 | 68.4 | 355 | 62.3 | 46 | 2.42 |
| EDB | 22 | 77.3 | 473 | 71.7 | 47 | 2.47 |
| CDP | 20 | 20.0 | 447 | 74.5 | 59 | 2.57 |
| SPR | 23 | 100.0 | 578 | 83.8 | 46 | 2.19 |
| Total/mean | 105 | 65.7 | 2324 | 73.8 | 135 | 1.29 |
Incidence of Epichloƫ and fungal species richness in roots of Festuca rubra subsp. pruinosa at five populations from marine cliffs in Northern Spain.
1Percentage of root pieces from which fungi emerged into growth medium.
Epichloƫ festucae was isolated from leaves of 65.7% of the plants. Its incidence among populations ranged from 20.0 to 100.0% (Table 1).
Identification of Fungal Isolates and Taxonomic Structure
When the isolates of each population were grouped according to morphotypes, the TDH isolates were classified into 177 morphotypes, CED in 142, EDB in 125, SPR in 137, and those from CDP in 107.
Nucleotide sequences were obtained from one or more isolates of each morphotype. As a result, 502 ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 nucleotide sequences were obtained, and those differing in homology by less than 3% were considered to belong to the same taxon. After this clustering process, 138 different sequences remained. These sequences were used to interrogate the UNITE sequence database, and as a result 135 fungal taxa were identified (Supplementary Table S1). Twenty-three taxa were identified to a species rank, 69 to genus rank and the remaining 43 were assigned to an order, class, family or division (Table 2). All the taxa could be assigned to 64 different fungal genera, 96% of them within the Ascomycota. Pleosporales, Hypocreales, and Eurotiales were the most representative orders, in terms of the number of taxa (23, 18, and 10%, respectively). The remaining orders were marginally represented (Figure 1). Among plant populations the number of fungal taxa ranged from 34 to 59 (Table 1).
Table 2
| Strain | Taxon | Identity to closest match (%) | ITS sequence accession number | Order | Incidence in plants (%) | Number of populations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T150 | Fusarium oxysporum | 100 | MH578626 | Hypocreales | 57.1 | 5 |
| EB4 | Diaporthe sp. A | 100 | MH578627 | Diaporthales | 54.3 | 5 |
| C29 | Fusarium sp. A | 100 | MH626490 | Helotiales | 41.0 | 4 |
| S75 | Helotiales sp. A | 100 | MH626491 | Helotiales | 37.1 | 5 |
| T105 | Drechslera sp. | 100 | MH626492 | Pleosporales | 27.6 | 4 |
| S132 | Slopeiomyces cylindrosporus | 100 | MH626493 | Magnaporthales | 27.6 | 3 |
| T120 | Penicillium sp. F | 100 | MH626494 | Eurotiales | 20.0 | 5 |
| S7 | Darksidea sp. | 99 | MH628220 | Pleosporales | 17.1 | 3 |
| T131 | Periconia macrospinosa | 100 | MH628221 | Pleosporales | 16.2 | 3 |
| T122 | Penicillium sp. A | 100 | MH628222 | Eurotiales | 14.3 | 4 |
| T16 | Alternaria sp. A | 99 | MH628223 | Pleosporales | 13.3 | 3 |
| S38 | Fusarium sp. B | 99 | MH628224 | Hypocreales | 13.3 | 4 |
| C2 | Dactylonectria alcacerensis | 100 | MH628225 | Hypocreales | 13.3 | 4 |
| E79 | Helotiales sp. B | 100 | MH628226 | Helotiales | 11.4 | 3 |
| T140 | Alternaria sp. B | 100 | MH628227 | Pleosporales | 10.5 | 4 |
| E74 | Lachnum sp. A | 99 | MH628228 | Helotiales | 10.5 | 3 |
| CP17 | Trichoderma sp. B | 100 | MH628229 | Hypocreales | 10.5 | 2 |
Core and abundant fungal species isolated from surface sterilized roots of Festuca rubra subsp. pruinosa at five populations from marine cliffs in northern Spain.
Only the taxa with an incidence in plants greater than 20% are listed. Supplementary Table S1 contains the complete list of 135 taxa identified.
FIGURE 1
The distribution of the taxa according to their incidence can be visualized in the rank-abundance curve shown in Figure 2. Seven species occurred in more than 20% of the plants at three or more populations: Fusarium oxysporum (57.1%), Diaporthe sp. A (54.3%), Fusarium sp. A (40.9%), Helotiales sp. A (37.1%), Slopeiomyces cylindrosporus (27.6%), Drechslera sp. (27.6%), and Penicillium sp. F (20.0%) (Table 2). The identification of several F. oxysporum strains was confirmed by Martijn Rep and Maria Constantin (University of Amsterdam) by means of an analysis of their EF1α gene sequence. Because of their relatively high incidence within and among populations, these taxa could be considered as part of the core microbiome of FRP.
FIGURE 2
A second set of relatively abundant taxa were isolated from 10 to 20% of the plants, and at two or more populations (Table 2), these were Darksidea sp., Periconia macrospinosa, Penicillium sp. A, Alternaria sp. A, Fusarium sp. B, Dactylonectria alcacerensis, Helotiales sp. B, Alternaria sp. B, Lachnum sp. A and Trichoderma sp. B. The remaining 118 taxa were found in less than 10% of the plants and 58 of them were singletons, occurring in a single plant.
Some of most abundant taxa, like Darksidea sp., Periconia macrospinosa, Slopeiomyces cylindrosporus and Drechslera sp., belong to the group of fungi known as dark septate endophytes (DSE). Fungi from the DSE group present some particular morphological characteristics, such as septated and melanized hyphae. These characteristics were observed in hyphae from two strains of Helotiales sp. A under the light microscope. Therefore, Helotiales sp. A also seems to belong to the DSE.
All populations produced non-asymptotic species accumulation curves, suggesting that increased sampling effort would reveal new fungal species (Figure 3). The Chao and Bootstrap estimators of the maximum number of species did not approach an horizontal asymptote, what made them unreliable estimators for this particular case.
FIGURE 3
Effect of Epichloƫ festucae on Root Endophytic Fungal Communities
In the set of 105 plants analyzed, 69 were infected by Epichloƫ festucae (E+) and 36 were not (E-). Out of the 135 fungal species identified in all plants, 52 were exclusive of E+ plants, 29 of E- plants, and 54 occurred in both.
The ANOVA showed that neither the presence of EpichloĆ« nor population had a significant effect on species richness (F = 1.999; p = 0.276 and F = 1.626; p = 0.174 respectively). The beta diversity index showed a similar trend, no significant differences were found between E+ and E- plants (p = 0.989) or among populations (p = 0.377 for all pairwise comparisons). The values of the Shannon diversity index (Hā) were relatively high, but similar for E+ and E- plants (Table 3).
Table 3
| Factor | Number of plants analyzed | Species per plant | Ć diversity (Kolleff) | Hā Shannon | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Epichloë | E+ | 69 | 7.19 ± 2.63 | 0.59 ± 0.07 | 4.04 |
| E- | 36 | 7.08 ± 3.11 | 0.59 ± 0.08 | 3.90 | |
| Population | TDH | 21 | 6.52 ± 1.91 | 0.51 ± 0.10 | 3.13 |
| CED | 19 | 6.84 ± 2.59 | 0.50 ± 0.10 | 3.32 | |
| EDB | 22 | 7.47 ± 2.55 | 0.56 ± 0.10 | 3.48 | |
| CDP | 20 | 6.67 ± 3.45 | 0.55 ± 0.10 | 3.59 | |
| SPR | 23 | 8.17 ± 3.04 | 0.55 ± 0.05 | 3.43 |
Fungal species richness and diversity in roots of Festuca rubra subsp. pruinosa plants infected (E+) or not infected (E-) by Epichloƫ festucae at five populations in marine cliffs.
Both E+ and E- plants displayed similar species accumulation curves when the data from all five populations were pooled (Figure 4A). The species richness accumulated at 36 plants was 80.93 ± 5.24 for E+ plants and 72.03 ± 1.04 for E- plants. Within each population, we found small differences (both positive and negative) between E+ and E- plants (Figures 4BāF).
FIGURE 4
The first two axes of the CCA were statistically significant (p = 0.001) and explained 35.18 and 29.36% of the variance. After the forward selection, only the variable population was finally included in the CCA and explained the 5.29% of the variation. The CCA biplot showed no clear separation between E+ and E- plants (Figure 5). However, there was a segregation among plant populations: the first axis clustered populations according to regions and separated the Asturian populations (CDP and SPR) from the Galician ones (TDH, CED and EDB); and the second axis segregated both Asturian populations, suggesting that the structure of the root mycobiota of these two populations differ between them and with respect to the Galician populations (Figure 5). All the core and the abundant taxa were present in both E+ and E- plants, although some species were more abundant in E+ (Slopeiomyces cylindrosporus) or in E- plants (Drechslera sp.) (Figure 6).
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 6
In terms of similarity of the fungal assemblages between pairs of populations, J values were higher between populations from the same region, 0.238 to 0.362 among Galician populations and 0.238 between Asturian populations, than between Galician and Asturian populations, which ranged from 0.095 to 0.193 (Table 4).
Table 4
| Population | TDH | CED | EDB | SPR | CDP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TDH | 1.000 | 0.238 | 0.362 | 0.095 | 0.147 |
| CED | 63 | 1.000 | 0.300 | 0.182 | 0.154 |
| EDB | 58 | 70 | 1.000 | 0.193 | 0.182 |
| SPR | 84 | 88 | 88 | 1.000 | 0.238 |
| CDP | 68 | 78 | 77 | 84 | 1.000 |
Jaccard index of similarity (bold) and number of fungal species identified in roots of each pair of populations (italic) of Festuca rubra subsp. pruinosa plants from marine cliffs.
Salt Tolerance and Enzymatic Activity of Endophytic Fungi
The salt tolerance assay showed that fungal strains had three different types of response in terms of their radial growth. Most strains analyzed (71.8%) were halophilic, showing a statistically significant increase in radial growth in PDA plates containing NaCl respect to the control (Supplementary Table S2). The radial growth of 51.5% of these halophilic strains increased at both NaCl concentrations; that of 21.2% increased only in 600 mM NaCl, and that of 27.3% increased only in 300 mM NaCl. All nine Fusarium strains and four of the five Diaporthe sp. A strains tested were halophylic.
Some strains (6.5%) were halotolerant, not showing a significant difference in radial growth in 300 mM and 600 mM NaCl with respect to the control. Finally, 21.7% of the strains showed a radial growth decrease in culture media containing NaCl and were classified as halosensitive, 80.0% of these strains decreased only in 600mM NaCl, and the remaining 20.0% did it at both salt concentrations. Within taxa like Diaporthe sp. A, Periconia macrospinosa or Penicillium sp. F, some strains had different responses, i.e., Diaporthe strain S129 was halophilic and strain S69 halosensitive (Supplementary Table S2).
The nine E. festucae strains tested were halosensitive, all decreased in radial growth in the 600 mM medium (Table 5). Seven of them did not show a significant difference in radial growth with respect to the control at 300 mM NaCl.
Table 5
| Strain | Radial growth (cm) | Type of response | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 mM | 300 mM | 600 mM | |||
| TDH1 | 2.12 ab | 2.40 b | 1.60 a | Halosensitive | ![]() |
| TDH11 | 1.97 ab | 2.42 a | 1.82 b | Halosensitive | |
| TDH3 | 2.67 a | 2.60 a | 1.62 b | Halosensitive | |
| CED6 | 2.67 a | 2.17 ab | 1.43 b | Halosensitive | |
| CED12 | 2.43 a | 2.37 a | 1.55 b | Halosensitive | |
| CED10 | 2.48 a | 2.40 a | 1.32 b | Halosensitive | |
| CED1 | 2.42 a | 2.33 a | 1.42 b | Halosensitive | |
| EDB9 | 2.37 a | 1.25 b | 0.67 c | Halosensitive | |
| EDB11 | 2.85 a | 1.65 b | 0.68 c | Halosensitive | |
Radial growth of nine Epichloƫ festucae strains isolated from Festuca rubra subsp. pruinosa plants from marine cliffs in PDA plates with different NaCl concentrations.
For each row different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Cellulase and amylase activities were assayed for 43 fungal strains (Table 6). Twenty three of these strains, including all tested strains of Fusarium oxysporum, Penicillium and Helotiales sp. A, showed cellulase activity in vitro. In contrast, none of the six Diaporthe sp. A strains tested was positive. Amylase activity was detected in only nine strains, including all four Penicillium strains tested.
Table 6
| ID | Endophyte | Cellulase activity | Amylase activity |
|---|---|---|---|
| T16 | Alternaria sp. A | - | ++ |
| C115 | Alternaria sp. B | - | + |
| T90 | Codinaeopsis sp. | ++ | - |
| C2 | Dactylonectria alcacerensis | - | - |
| C1 | Darksidea sp. | + | - |
| C7 | Darksidea sp. | + | - |
| CP36 | Diaporthe sp. A | - | - |
| EB4 | Diaporthe sp. A | - | - |
| S129 | Diaporthe sp. A | - | + |
| S32 | Diaporthe sp. A | - | - |
| S69 | Diaporthe sp. A | - | - |
| T18 | Diaporthe sp. A | - | - |
| CP1 | Drechslera sp. | - | - |
| E71 | Drechslera sp. | - | - |
| T41 | Drechslera sp. | - | - |
| T50 | Drechslera sp. | - | - |
| CD8 | Epichloƫ festucae | - | - |
| S13 | Fusarium sp. A | + | - |
| T112 | Fusarium sp. A | + | - |
| T6 | Fusarium sp. A | + | - |
| C70 | Fusarium sp. B | + | - |
| S38 | Fusarium sp. B | + | + |
| CP3 | Fusarium oxysporum | ++ | - |
| S10 | Fusarium oxysporum | + | ++ |
| SP8 | Fusarium oxysporum | + | - |
| T150 | Fusarium oxysporum | + | - |
| E79 | Helotiales sp. B | +++ | - |
| S74 | Lachnum sp. | - | - |
| C44 | Helotiales sp. A | ++ | - |
| S75 | Helotiales sp. A | ++ | - |
| T141 | Helotiales sp. A | ++ | - |
| T29 | Helotiales sp. A | + | - |
| T3 | Helotiales sp. A | ++ | - |
| T114 | Penicillium sp. F | ++ | +++ |
| C13 | Penicillium sp. A | + | + |
| E7 | Penicillium sp. A | +++ | + |
| T59 | Penicillium sp. A | ++ | + |
| S6 | Periconia macrospinosa | - | - |
| T131 | Periconia macrospinosa | - | - |
| C43 | Slopeiomyces cylindrosporus | - | - |
| S5 | Slopeiomyces cylindrosporus | - | - |
| T70 | Slopeiomyces cylindrosporus | - | - |
| CP17 | Trichoderma sp. B | ++ | - |
Cellulase and amylase activity in fungal strains isolated from roots Festuca rubra subsp. pruinosa plants from marine cliffs.
(-) No enzymatic activity; (+) Slight activity; halo < 3 mm. (++) Moderate activity; halo < 5 mm. (+++) High activity; halo > 5 mm.
Effect of FRP Endophytes on Growth of Lolium perenne
A two-way ANOVA showed a significant effect of salinity (p = 0.004; control= 0.236 g, NaCl= 0.192 g), endophyte inoculated (p < 0.001; control= 0.194 g, Periconia = 0.231 g, Penicillium = 0.109,Diaporthe = 0.321 g), and their interaction (p = 0.034; Figure 7) on dry matter production of L. perenne. Plants inoculated with Diaporthe S69, a Diaporthe sp. A strain, showed a significant increase in biomass production with respect to the uninoculated control plants in both watering treatments: 31.3% in tap water and 48.9% under saline irrigation (Figure 7). The plants inoculated with Periconia S6 had greater biomass in both watering treatments, but the difference respect to the controls was not significant. In contrast, plants inoculated with Penicillium E7 did not show visual symptoms of stress such as dry leaves, but showed a significant decrease in biomass production under the tap water treatment; in the salinity treatment the difference in biomass was not significant with respect to uninoculated plants. In addition, the biomass of plants inoculated with Penicillium E7 did not differ between tap water and salinity treatments.
FIGURE 7
Sodium was significantly affected by salt (p < 0.001), endophyte inoculated (p < 0.001) and their interaction (p = 0.002). Inoculated plants with Periconia S6 and Diaporthe S69 strains had greater Na than controls under tap water treatment (Figure 7). When plants were salt irrigated, the increase in Na was greater in plants inoculated with E7, S6 or S69 strains than in control plants. Potassium content was significantly affected by salt (p = 0.038), endophyte inoculated (p < 0.001) and their interaction (p = 0.003). Inoculated plants with E7, S6 or S69 strains had significantly greater K concentration than controls at water treatment (Figure 7). At salt treatment, plants inoculated with Penicillium E7 had the greatest K content.
After the harvest, root fragments of Lolium perenne were plated on culture media and the fungal isolates obtained were identified through morphological characteristics as the endophytes inoculated into the plants. The reisolation of these fungi indicated their compatibility with L. perenne and the success of plant inoculation.
Discussion
The Core Microbiome of Festuca rubra subsp. pruinosa
The roots of Festuca rubra subsp. pruinosa were found to be a niche containing numerous fungal species, an assemblage of 135 culturable species was identified. This magnitude is not unusual in surveys of the mycobiota of grasses (SƔnchez MƔrquez et al., 2012), but the high incidence of seven species that were present in more than 20% of the plants, and in several populations is remarkable. These species were Fusarium oxysporum, Diaporthe sp. A, Fusarium sp. A, Helotiales sp. A, Drechslera sp., Slopeiomyces cylindrosporus, and Penicillium sp. F. In particular, Fusarium oxysporum and Diaporthe sp. A occurred in more than 50% of the plants, and at all five populations examined. Those seven fungal species seem to be components of the core microbiome of FRP, because they are shared by a significant number of plants, and occur at different populations (Shade and Handelsman, 2012). It is not common to find a group of fungal species with such high incidence within and among plant populations. Using similar methodology, as well as culture independent methods, no more than two or three species with an incidence greater than 20% were found in surveys of other grasses (SƔnchez MƔrquez et al., 2008, 2010; Ofek-Lalzar et al., 2016; Zhong et al., 2018). In addition, dominant species reported in several taxa of inland grasses, such as Cladosporium or Epicoccum, were absent from FRP plants (PelƔez et al., 1998; SƔnchez MƔrquez et al., 2012; Ofek-Lalzar et al., 2016).
Two of the core taxa of FRP belonged to the genus Fusarium. Although this genus is best known due to important pathogens of numerous agricultural species, it is also one of the most commonly isolated genera of endophytes from grasses and other plants (VƔzquez de Aldana et al., 2013; Martins et al., 2016; Lofgren et al., 2018). Research on endophytic Fusarium has shown that some strains can improve the salinity tolerance of their host plants (Rodriguez and Redman, 2008; Redman et al., 2011). Furthermore, F. oxysporum strains obtained from FRP plants in this study were found to protect tomato plants against a pathogenic strain of F. oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici (Constantin et al., 2017).
The genus Diaporthe contains numerous species that behave as endophytes or pathogens, and in some cases as both, depending on the host plant species (Gomes et al., 2013). Diaporthe sp. A is a main component of the core microbiome of FRP, and species of this genus have also been reported as dominant components of the microbiome of olive and other plants (Martins et al., 2016; Noriler et al., 2018). Regarding mutualism, Diaporthe strains originally isolated from wild plant species promoted the growth of rice and tritordeum (Yang et al., 2015; Zabalgogeazcoa et al., 2018).
Our work revealed that associations between DSE and FRP roots are common in sea cliffs. Some of the core and most abundant taxa, such as Darksidea sp., Periconia macrospinosa, Slopeiomyces cylindrosporus and Drechslera sp., were previously reported as DSE in other grasses (Hornby et al., 1977; Knapp et al., 2012, 2015; Siless et al., 2018). In addition, Helotiales sp. A also seems to be a DSE because its hyphae had characteristics of this group, and other members of the Helotiales (i.e., Phialocephala fortinii) are recognized as DSE (Sieber and Grünig, 2013; Ridout et al., 2017). DSE colonize roots of plants communities in different habitats, and some authors hypothesized that these fungi can play an important role in plant adaptation to abiotic stress conditions, especially drought (Porras-Alfaro et al., 2008; Knapp et al., 2015). However, in spite of their abundance in nature, there is still uncertainty about the ecological significance of plant-DSE symbioses (Mandyam and Jumpponen, 2014).
Given the characteristics of the FRP habitat, strains from taxa belonging to the core microbiome of FRP are excellent candidates to test their possible role in host plant adaptation to salinity. Habitat-adapted symbiosis is a phenomenon which occurs when plants establish relationships with symbionts which enhance their adaptation to a particular stress factor present in their habitat (Rodriguez and Redman, 2008). Whether this occurs in the plant-endophyte systems here described would require inoculation of FRP seedlings and evaluation of plant performance parameters under salinity stress. The search for endophytes from the core microbiome of wild plants adapted to unhospitable habitats has produced interesting solutions for the improvement of stress tolerance on agronomic crops (Redman et al., 2011; Ali et al., 2018).
Because of our research interest in culturable fungi, and the isolation methods used, components of the plant microbiome such as bacteria or non-culturable fungi were not identified in this survey. Members of these groups could have an important role in the adaptation of FRP plants to marine cliffs. For instance, symbioses with arbuscular mycorrizal fungi (AMF) can contribute to plant growth and protection under environmental stress (Lenoir et al., 2016). Symbiotic associations with AMF have been reported for some Festuca species (i.e., DalpƩ and Aiken, 1998; Santos et al., 2006), but their presence and effects in FRP were not studied, and deserve attention.
In this work, about 72% of the fungal strains from FRP roots were classified as halophilic, their radial growth in vitro increased in the presence of NaCl. This category included some species of the core microbiome of FRP, like Diaporthe sp. A, Fusarium oxysporum, Fusarium sp. A, and Helotiales sp. A. In contrast, E. festucae showed a halosensitive response. The life cycle of this fungus which colonizes the intercellular space of aerial tissues and is seed transmitted, can be completely endophytic. Thus, host plants protect the fungus from the harmful saline environment. However, other fungal species which spend a part of their life cycle outside of their plant hosts might benefit from being halotolerant.
Cellulase or amylase enzymatic activity in vitro was detected in some of the core taxa, such as Fusarium oxysporum, Helotiales sp. A and Penicillium sp. F. These enzymes degrade cellulose and starch to soluble sugars such as glucose, cellobiose, and other oligomers which can be readily absorbed by plant roots (Carroll et al., 1983). Considering that FRP plants grow in rock fissures where soil and nutrients are very scarce, fungi with these enzymatic activities could have a role recycling nutrients from dead roots. However, these two enzymatic activities were not detected in cultures of Slopeiomyces cylindrosporus, a fungus with saprobic capability (Hornby et al., 1977), and cellulase activity was absent form Diaporthe sp. A strains. This result could be due to non-induction of these enzymes in the culture medium used, because both fungal strains grew well as saprobes in a beet pulp medium, rich in carbohydrate and protein, which was used to prepare inoculum for plant inoculations.
Potential of FRP Endophytes for Plant Improvement
Knowledge about the role of endophytic fungi on plant adaptation to salinity stress is important because the world surface of saline soils is increasing, producing economic losses in crops (Munns and Gilliham, 2015). Diaporthe sp. A strain S69 improved the growth of plants of Lolium perenne, an important forage grass, in the presence and absence of salinity stress. On average, plants inoculated with Diaporthe S69 produced 31% more aerial biomass than the uninoculated controls under normal conditions, and 49% more under salinity stress. Similarly, fungal endophytes such as Piriformospora indica, Fusarium culmorum, or Penicillium minioluteum can alter physiological processes and improve tolerance to salt stress in agricultural crop species (Baltruschat et al., 2008; Khan et al., 2011; Redman et al., 2011).
One of the indirect consequences of salinity is an enrichment of Na and deficiency of K in plant cells, caused by the competition between Na and K, that have similar ionic radii and ion hydration energies (Munns and Tester, 2008). We found that L. perenne plants inoculated with Periconia S6, Penicillium E7 and Diaporthe S69 strains accumulated significantly more K in aboveground tissues under the tap water treatment than uninoculated plants; this suggests that an enrichment of Na due to salinity might have been prevented by the increased K content present before the stress. Similar results were observed in grasses inoculated with Aspergillus aculeatus (Xie et al., 2017) suggesting that the maintenance of a high level of K may contribute the alleviation of the negative effect of sodium. A beneficial effect of K accumulation in plants has also been reported for associations with arbuscular mycorrhiza (Langenfeld-Heyser et al., 2007) and Epichloë spp. (Chen et al., 2018). It is important to point out that the increase in biomass of L. perenne plants inoculated with Diaporthe strain S69 occurred not only during salt treatment but also in the tap water treatment. This implies that the fungal effect improving plant growth was not a specific process induced by salinity. To study the effect of fungal strains on plant parameters which can be altered by endophytes to improve plant performance, such as phytohormones, photosynthetic capacity, nutrient absorption or antioxidant capability (Baltruschat et al., 2008; Redman et al., 2011; Leitão and Enguita, 2016) is a future objective of our research.
Effect of Epichloƫ festucae, an Aboveground Tissue Endophyte, on Root Mycobiota
The incidence of Epichlƶe festucae in FRP populations was 65.7%, a value very similar to that of 69% observed in a previous survey that included the same populations from Galicia (Zabalgogeazcoa et al., 2006). The relatively high incidence of E. festucae suggests that in an unhospitable habitat like sea cliffs, the costs of harboring a systemic symbiont could be compensated by mutualism. However, endophyte incidences closer to 100% could be expected under such circumstances. Whether natural selection favoring E+ plants, the efficiency of seed transmission, or a combination of both processes are involved in the prevalence rates of EpichloĆ« observed in FRP populations is unknown, and deserves further study. Imperfect seed transmission (<100%) has been reported in other grass ā EpichloĆ« systems (Gundel et al., 2009). High incidence of EpichloĆ« festucae in Festuca rubra populations has been reported in semiarid grasslands (70%) (Zabalgogeazcoa et al., 1999), or in the Scottish islands of St. Kilda (80%) (Bazely et al., 1997). In contrast, in Finland only 9 of 49 infected F. rubra populations had frequencies greater than 50% (Wali et al., 2007), and no plants harboring EpichloĆ« were found in populations from subarctic regions of Canada (Santangelo and Kotanen, 2016).
In some grass-endophyte associations Epichloƫ species could play a key role in salt tolerance. In pot experiments Epichloƫ coenophiala increased the root biomass of tall fescue (Schedonorus arundinaceous) (Sabzalian and Mirlohi, 2010), and another Epichloƫ species increased the shoot and root biomass of wild barley (Hordeum brevisubulatum) under salinity stress (Song et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2018). In contrast, in FRP plants no significant effect of Epichloƫ on shoot dry weight was detected under salt treatment, although root growth or other parameters that could be affected by the presence of E. festucae under salinity were not analyzed (Zabalgogeazcoa et al., 2006). Nevertheless, in a stressful habitat like sea cliffs, environmental pressure on a holobiont might not necessarily affect an individual endophyte, but an assemblage where interactions among the plant host and the eukaryotic and prokaryotic microbiome components might be complex.
The presence of Epichloƫ in aboveground tissues of the host plant can affect underground processes by altering rhizospheric conditions that affect the density and activity of soil microorganisms (Omacini et al., 2012). This may result from endophyte effects on root exudates that can act as chemical attractants or repellents in the rhizosphere (Malinowski et al., 1998). For instance, phenolic compounds are microbial inhibitors, and they increase in roots due to the presence of Epichloƫ (Ponce et al., 2009; VƔzquez de Aldana et al., 2011). The effect of Epichloƫ on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi has been extensively studied, and reduction, promotion, and null effects have been reported (Omacini et al., 2006; Novas et al., 2012; Rojas et al., 2016). Our results indicate that E. festucae did not have a clear and significant effect on the composition of the core microbiome or other mycobiota from FRP roots, although changes in the abundance of some species were found. These results are in agreement with other studies where the presence of Epichloƫ did not alter fungal colonization in roots (Vandegrift et al., 2015; Slaughter and McCulley, 2016) or shoots (Zabalgogeazcoa et al., 2013). Nevertheless, Zhong et al. (2018) reported that the presence of Epichloƫ decreased the diversity of root-associated fungi in Achnatherum inebrians and changed the community composition. However, such changes were in fungal orders with an abundance lower than 10%, where the number of isolates of these taxa can be low.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this study shows that numerous species of culturable fungi are associated to the roots of Festuca rubra subsp. pruinosa in its sea cliff habitat. Within this fungal assemblage of 135 species, a set of seven species occurred in a relatively high number of plants and locations, and those seem to be components of the core mycobiome of FRP: Fusarium oxysporum, Diaporthe sp. A, Fusarium sp. A, Helotiales sp. A, Drechslera sp., Slopeiomyces cylindrosporus, and Penicillium sp. F. Strains of these species are very promising candidates to study their role in the adaptation of FRP plants to salinity, a characteristic stress factor of their habitat. Furthermore, a Diaporthe strain belonging to the core taxa significantly improved the growth of Lolium perenne plants under normal and salinity stress conditions, showing the potential of the FRP core microbiome for the improvement of agricultural crops.
Statements
Author contributions
EP collected the plants, isolated and identified fungi, made the experiments, and analyzed the data. BA designed the experiments, participated in plant collection, and analyzed the data. LS made the statistical analyses. IZ supervised the research, helped to sample plants, designed the experiments and analyzed the data. EP, BA, and IZ wrote the article.
Funding
This study has received funding from the European Unionās Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program under the Marie SkÅodowska-Curie grant agreement no. 676480. LS was funded through a Talent Recruitment grant from āObra Social La CaixaāFundación CANā. We acknowledge support of the publication fee by the CSIC Open Access Publication Support Initiative through its Unit of Information Resources for Research (URICI).

Acknowledgments
Martijn Rep and Maria Constantin, from the University of Amsterdam, helped to identify Fusarium oxysporum strains. The technical help of MarĆa JosĆ© Cuesta and CĆ©sar Paredero are acknowledged.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2018.03321/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AEMET (2012). GuĆa Resumida del Clima en EspaƱa 1981ā2010. Gobierno de EspaƱa. Available at: http://www.aemet.es/es/serviciosclimaticos/datosclimatologicos/valoresclimatologicos
2
AliA. H.AbdelrahmanM.RadwanU.El-ZayatS.El-SayedM. A. (2018). Effect of Thermomyces fungal endophyte isolated from extreme hot desert-adapted plant on heat stress tolerance of cucumber.Appl. Soil Ecol.124155ā162. 10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.11.004
3
BaltruschatH.FodorJ.HarrachB. D.NiemczykE.BarnaB.GullnerG. (2008). Salt tolerance of barley induced by the root endophyte Piriformospora indica is associated with a strong increase in antioxidants.New Phytol.180501ā510. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02583.x
4
BazelyD. R.VicariM.EmmerichS.FilipL.LinD.InmanA. (1997). Interactions between herbivores and endophyte-infected Festuca rubra from the Scottish islands of St. Kilda, Benbecula and Rum.J. Appl. Ecol.34847ā860. 10.2307/2405276
5
CarrollG.PetriniG.PetriniO. (1983). Patterns of substrate utilization by some endophytes from coniferous foliage.Mycologia7553ā63. 10.2307/3792923
6
ChenT.JohnsonR.ChenS.LuH.ZhouJ.LiC. (2018). Infection by the fungal endophyte EpichloĆ« bromicola enhances the tolerance of wild barley (Hordeum brevisubulatum) to salt and alkali stresses.Plant Soil428353ā370. 10.1007/s11104-018-3643-4
7
ClayK.SchardlC. (2002). Evolutionary origins and ecological consequences of endophyte symbiosis with grasses.Am. Natur.60S99āS127. 10.1086/342161
8
ColwellR. K. (2005). EstimateS: Statistical Estimation of Species Richness and Shared Species From Samples. Version 7.5. Available at: http://purl.oclc.org/estimates.
9
ConstantinM. E.de LamoF.TakkenF.RepM. (2017). āFusarium oxysporum and its biocontrol,ā in Proceedings of the Book of abstracts of the 29th Fungal Genetics Conference (2017 March14-19) (Pacific Grove, CA: Genetics Society of America), 238.
10
DalpĆ©Y.AikenS. G. (1998). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated with Festuca species in the Canadian High Artic.Can. J. Bot.761930ā1938. 10.1139/b98-165
11
DoodyJ. P. (2001). āSea cliffs and sea cliff vegetation,ā in Coastal Conservation and Management. An Ecological Perspective. Conservation Biology seriesVol. 13ed.DoodyJ. P. (Berlin: Springer Science), 25ā52.
12
GomesR. R.GlienkeC.VideiraS. I. R.LombardL.GroenewaldJ. Z.CrousP. W. (2013). Diaporthe: a genus of endophytic, saprobic and plant pathogenic fungi.Persoonia311ā41. 10.3767/003158513X666844
13
GundelP. E.GaribaldiL. A.TognettiP. M.AragonR.GhersaC. M.OmaciniM. (2009). Imperfect vertical transmission of the endophyte Neotyphodium in exotic grasses in grasslands of the flooding Pampa.Microb. Ecol.57740ā748. 10.1007/s00248-008-9447-y
14
HankinL.AnagnostakisS. L. (1975). The use of solid media for detection of enzyme production by fungi.Mycologia67597ā607. 10.2307/3758395
15
HornbyD.SlopeD. B.GutteridgeR. J.SivanesanA. (1977). Gaeumannomyces cylindrosporus, a new ascomycete from cereal roots.Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc.6921ā25.
16
HumpreysM. O. (1982). The genetic basis of tolerance to salt spry in popultions of Festuca rubra L.New Phytol.91287ā296. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1982.tb03313.x
17
JaccardP. (1912). The distribution of the flora in the alpine zone.New Phytol.1137ā50.
18
KhanA.HamayunM.AhmadN.HussainJ.KangS.KimY.et al (2011). Salinity stress resistance offered by endophytic fungal interaction between Penicillium minioluteum LHL09 and Glycine max, L.J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.21893ā902. 10.4014/jmb.1103.03012
19
KnappD.KovacsG.ZajtaE.GroenewaldJ.CrousP. (2015). Dark septate endophytic pleosporalean genera from semiarid areas.Persoonia3587ā100. 10.3767/003158515X687669
20
KnappD.PintyeA.KovĆ”csG. (2012). The dark side is not fastidious ā Dark septate endophytic fungi of native and invasive plants of semiarid sandy areas.PLoS One7:e32570. 10.1371/journal.pone.0032570
21
KoleffP.GastonK. J.LennonJ. J. (2003). Measuring beta diversity for presence-absence data.J. Anim. Ecol.72367ā382. 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00710.x
22
Langenfeld-HeyserR.GaoJ.DucicT.TachdP.LuC. F.FritzE.et al (2007). Paxillus involutus mycorrhiza attenuate NaCl-stress responses in the salt-sensitive hybrid poplar Populus Ć Canescens.Mycorrhiza17121ā131. 10.1007/s00572-006-0084-3
23
LeitĆ£oA. L.EnguitaF. J. (2016). Gibberellins in Penicillium strains: challenges for endophyte-plant host interactions under salinity stress.Microbiol. Res.1838ā18. 10.1016/j.micres.2015.11.004
24
LenoirI.FontaineJ.SahraouiA. (2016). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal responses to abiotic stresses: a review.Phytochemistry1234ā15. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2016.01.002
25
LepŔJ.ŠmilauerP. (2003). Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data Using CANOCO.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26
LeuchtmannA.SchardlC. L.SiegelM. R. (1994). Sexual compatibility and taxonomy of a new species of EpichloĆ« symbiotic with fine fescue grasses.Mycologia86802ā6812. 10.2307/3760595
27
LofgrenL. A.LeBlancN. R.CertanoA. K.NachtigallJ.LaBineK. M.RiddleJ.et al (2018). Fusarium graminearum: pathogen or endophyte of North American grasses? New Phytol.2171203ā1212. 10.1111/nph.14894
28
López-BedoyaJ. L.PĆ©rez-AlbertiA. (2009). ā1230 Acantilados con vegetación de las costas atlĆ”nticas y bĆ”lticas,ā in Bases Ecológicas Preliminares para la Conservación de los Tipos de HĆ”bitat de InterĆ©s Comunitario en EspaƱa (Madrid: Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, y Medio Rural y Marino), 1ā144.
29
MalinowskiD. P.AlloushG. A.BeleskyD. P. (1998). Evidence for chemical changes on the root surface of tall fescue in response to infection with the fungal endophyte Neotyphodium coenophialum.Plant Soil2051ā12. 10.1023/A:1004331932018
30
MandyamK.JumpponenA. (2014). āUnraveling the dark septate endophyte functions: insights from the Arabidopsis model,ā in Advances in Endophytic Research, edsVermaV. C.GangeA. C. (India: Springer), 115ā141. 10.1007/978-81-322-1575-2_6
31
Markgraf-DannenbergI. (1980). āFestuca L,ā in Flora Europaea, edsTutinT. G.HeywoodV. H.BurgesN. A.MooreD. M.ValentineD. H.WaltersS. M.et al (Cambridge: University Press), 125ā153.
32
MartĆnez SagarraG.AbadP.DevesaJ. A. (2017). Study of the leaf anatomy in cross-section in the Iberian species of Festuca L. (Poaceae) and its systematic significance.PhytoKeys8343ā74. 10.3897/phytokeys.83.13746
33
MartinsF.PereiraJ. A.BotaP.BentoA.BaptistaP. (2016). Fungal endophyte communities in above- and belowground olive tree organs and the effect of season and geographic location on their structures.Fungal Ecol.20193ā201. 10.1016/j.funeco.2016.01.005
34
MunnsR.GillihamM. (2015). Salinity tolerance of crops ā What is the cost?New Phytol.208668ā673. 10.1111/nph.13519
35
MunnsR.TesterM. (2008). Mechanisms of salinity tolerance.Ann. Rev. Plant Biol.59651ā681. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911
36
NCBI (2004). Using BLASTClust to Make Non-Redundant Sequence Sets.NCBI News. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Web/Newsltr/Spring04/blastlab.html
37
NorilerS. A.SaviD. C.AluizioR.PalƔcio-CortesA. M.PossiedeY. M.GlienkeC. (2018). Bioprospecting and structure of fungal endophyte communities found in the Brazilian biomes, Pantanal, and Cerrado.Front. Microbiol.9:1526. 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01526
38
NovasM. V.IannoneL. J.GodeasA. M.ScervinoJ. M. (2012). Evidence for leaf endophyte regulation of root symbionts: effect of Neotyphodium endophytes on the pre-infective state of mycorrhizal fungi.Symbiosis5519ā28. 10.1007/s13199-011-0140-4
39
Ofek-LalzarM.GurY.Ben-MosheS.SharonO.KosmanE.MochliE.et al (2016). Diversity of fungal endophytes in recent and ancient wheat ancestors Triticum dicoccoides and Aegilops sharonensis.FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.92:fiw152. 10.1093/femsec/fiw152
40
OksanenJ.BlanchetF. G.FriendlyM.KindtR.LegendreP.McGlinnD.et al (2017). Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.4-3. Available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan
41
OmaciniM.EggersT.BonkowskiM.GangeA. C.JonesT. H. (2006). Leaf endophytes affect mycorrhizal status and growth of co-infected and neighbouring plants.Funct. Ecol.20226ā232. 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2006.01099.x
42
OmaciniM.SemmartinM.PĆ©rezL. I.GundelP. E. (2012). Grass-endophyte symbiosis: a neglected aboveground interaction with multiple belowground consequences.Appl. Soil Ecol.61273ā279. 10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.10.012
43
OrtuƱezE.de la FuenteV. (2010). Epidermal micromorphology of the genus Festuca L. (Poaceae) in the Iberian Peninsula.Plant. Syst. Evol.284201ā218. 10.1007/s00606-009-0248-7
44
PelĆ”ezF.ColladoJ.ArenalF.BasilioA.CabelloA.DĆez MatasM. T.et al (1998). Endophytic fungi from plants living on gypsum soils as a source of secondary metabolites with antimicrobial activity.Mycol. Res.102755ā761.
45
PonceM. A.BompadreM. J.ScervinoJ. M.OcampoJ. A.ChanetonE. J.GodeasA. M. (2009). Flavonoids, benzoic acids and cinnamic acids isolated from shoots and roots of Italian rye grass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) with and without endophyte association and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus.Biochem. Syst. Ecol.37245ā253. 10.1016/j.bse.2009.03.010
46
Porras-AlfaroA.HerreraJ.SinsabaughR. L.OdenbachK. J.LowreyT.NatvigD. O. (2008). Novel root fungal consortium associated with a dominant desert grass.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.742805ā2813. 10.1128/AEM.02769-07
47
RedmanR. S.KimY. O.WoodwardC. J.GreerC.EspinoL.DotyS. L.et al (2011). Increased fitness of rice plants to abiotic stress via habitat adapted symbiosis: a strategy for mitigating impacts of climate change.PLoS One6:e14823. 10.1371/journal.pone.0014823
48
RidoutM.HoubrakenJ.NewcomeG. (2017). Xerotolerance of Penicillium and Phialocephala fungi, dominant taxa of fine lateral roots of woody plants in the intermountain Pacific Northwest, USA.Rhizosphere494ā103. 10.1016/j.rhisph.2017.09.004
49
RodriguezR.RedmanR. (2008). More than 400 million years of evolution and some plants still canāt make it on their own: plant stress tolerance via fungal symbiosis.J. Exp. Bot.591109ā1114. 10.1093/jxb/erm342
50
RodriguezR. J.HensonJ.Van VolkenburghE.HoyM.WrightL.BeckwithF.et al (2008). Stress tolerance in plants via habitat-adapted symbiosis.ISME J.2404ā416. 10.1038/ismej.2007.106
51
RojasX.GuoJ.LeffJ.McNearD.FiererN.McCulleyR. (2016). Infection with a shoot-specific fungal endophyte (EpichloĆ«) alters tall fescue soil microbial communities.Microb. Ecol.72197ā206. 10.1007/s00248-016-0750-8
52
SabzalianM.MirlohiA. (2010). Neotyphodium endophytes trigger salt resistance in tall and meadow fescues.J. Plant Nutur. Soil Sci.173952ā957. 10.1002/jpln.200900345
53
SĆ”nchez MĆ”rquezS.BillsG. F.AcuƱaL. D.ZabalgogeazcoaI. (2010). Endophytic mycobiota of leaves and roots of the grass Holcus lanatus.Fungal Divers.41115ā123.
54
SĆ”nchez MĆ”rquezS.BillsG. F.HerreroN.ZabalgogeazcoaI. (2012). Non-systemic fungal endophytes of grasses.Fungal Ecol.5289ā297. 10.1016/j.funeco.2010.12.001
55
SĆ”nchez MĆ”rquezS.BillsG. F.ZabalgogeazcoaI. (2008). Diversity and structure of the fungal endophytic assemblages from two sympatric coastal grasses.Fungal Divers.3387ā100.
56
SantangeloJ. S.KotanenP. M. (2016). Nonsystemic fungal endophytes increase survival but reduce tolerance to simulated herbivory in subarctic Festuca rubra.Ecosphere7:e01260. 10.1002/ecs2.1260
57
SantosJ. C.FinlayR. D.TehlerA. (2006). Molecular analysis of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonising a seminatural grassland along a fertilisation gradient.New Phytol.172159ā168. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01799.x
58
ShadeA.HandelsmanJ. (2012). Beyond the Venn diagram: the hunt for a core microbiome.Environ. Microbiol.144ā12. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02585.x
59
SieberT. H.GrünigC. R. (2013). āFungal root endophytes,ā in The Hidden Half, edsEshelA.BeeckmanT.. (Boca Raton: CRC Press). 10.1201/9780203909423.ch49
60
SilessG. E.GallarfoG. L.RodriguezM. J.RincónY. A.GodeasA. M.CabreraG. M. (2018). Metabolites from the dark septate endophyte Drechslera sp. evaluation by LC/MS and principal component analysis of culture extracts with histone deacetylase inhibitors.Chem. Biodivers.15:e1800133. 10.1002/cbdv.201800133
61
SlaughterL.McCulleyR. (2016). Aboveground EpichloĆ« coenophialaāGrass associations do not affect belowground fungal symbionts or associated plant, soil parameters.Microb. Ecol.72682ā691. 10.1007/s00248-016-0828-3
62
SongM.ChaiQ.LiX.YaoX.LiC.ChristensenM.et al (2015). An asexual EpichloĆ« endophyte modifies the nutrient stoichiometry of wild barley (Hordeum brevisubulatum) under salt stress.Plant Soil387153ā165. 10.1007/s11104-014-2289-0
63
SunithaV. H.Nirmala DeviD.SrinivasC. (2013). Extracellular enzymatic activity of endophytic fungal strains isolated from medicinal plants.World J. Agric. Sci.91ā9. 10.5829/idosi.wjas.2013.9.1.72148
64
VandegriftR.RoyB.Pfeifer-MeisterL.JohnsonB.BridghamS. (2015). The herbaceous landlord: integrating the effects of symbiont consortia within a single host.Peer J.3:e1379. 10.7717/peerj.1379
65
VĆ”zquez de AldanaB. R.BillsG.ZabalgogeazcoaI. (2013). Are endophytes an important link between airborne spores and allergen exposure?Fungal Divers.6033ā42. 10.1007/s13225-013-0223-z
66
VĆ”zquez de AldanaB. R.RomoM.Garcia-CiudadA.PetiscoC.Garcia-CriadoB. (2011). Infection with the fungal endophyte Epichloe festucae may alter the allelopathic potential of red fescue.Ann. Appl. Biol.159281ā290. 10.1111/j.1744-7348.2011.00495.x
67
WaliP. R.AhlholmJ. U.HelanderM.SaikkonenK. (2007). Occurrence and genetic structure of the systemic grass endophyte Epichloe festucae in fine fescue populations.Microb. Ecol.5320ā29. 10.1007/s00248-006-9076-2
68
WallerF.AchatzB.BaltruschatH.FodorJ.BeckerK.FischerM.et al (2005). The endophytic fungus Piriformospora indica reprograms barley to salt-stress tolerance, disease resistance, and higher yield.Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.10213386ā13391. 10.1073/pnas.0504423102
69
WhiteT. J.BrunsT.LeeS.TaylorJ. (1990). āAmplificacition and direct sequencing of fungal rigosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics,ā in PCR Protocols: A guide to Methods and ApplicationsedInnisM. A. (San Diego, CA: Academic Press), 315ā322.
70
XieY.HanS.LiX.AmomboE.FuJ. (2017). Amelioration of salt stress on bermudagrass by the fungus Aspergillus aculeatus.Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.30245ā254. 10.1094/MPMI-12-16-0263-R
71
YangB.WangX. M.MaH. Y.YangT.JiaY.ZhouJ.et al (2015). Fungal endophyte Phomopsis liquidambari affects nitrogen transformation processes and related microorganisms in the rice rhizosphere.Front. Microbiol.6:982. 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00982
72
ZabalgogeazcoaI.CuestaM. J.ArellanoJ. B.Mellado-OrtegaE.OizL. F.OizL.et al (2018). āA Diaporthe endophyte improves the field performance of tritordeum,ā in Proceedings of the Book of Abstracts of the 10th International Symposium on Fungal Endophytes of Grasses, edsVĆ”zquez de AldanaB. R.ZabalgogeazcoaI. (Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca), 121.
73
ZabalgogeazcoaI.GundelP.HelanderM.SaikkonenK. (2013). Non-systemic fungal endophytes in Festuca rubra plants infected by EpichloĆ« festucae in subarctic habitats.Fungal Divers.6025ā32. 10.1007/s13225-013-0233-x
74
ZabalgogeazcoaI.RomoM.KeckE.VĆ”zquez de AldanaB.GarcĆa CiudadA.GarcĆa CriadoB.et al (2006). The infection of Festuca rubra subsp. pruinosa by EpichloĆ« festucae.Grass Forage Sci.6171ā76. 10.1111/j.1365-2494.2006.00509.x
75
ZabalgogeazcoaI.VĆ”zquez de AldanaB. R.GarcĆa CriadoB.GarcĆa CiudadA. (1999). The infection of Festuca rubra by the fungal endophyte EpichloĆ« festucae in Mediterranean permanent grasslands.Grass Forage Sci.5491ā95. 10.1046/j.1365-2494.1999.00155.x
76
ZhongR.XiaC.JuY.LiN.ZhangX.NanZ.et al (2018). Effects of EpichloĆ« gansuensis on root-associated fungal communities of Achnatherum inebrians under different growth conditions.Fungal Ecol.3129ā36. 10.1016/j.funeco.2017.10.005
Summary
Keywords
mycobiome, Diaporthe, Fusarium oxysporum, Epichloƫ, salinity, halophyte, grass
Citation
Pereira E, VƔzquez de Aldana BR, San Emeterio L and Zabalgogeazcoa I (2019) A Survey of Culturable Fungal Endophytes From Festuca rubra subsp. pruinosa, a Grass From Marine Cliffs, Reveals a Core Microbiome. Front. Microbiol. 9:3321. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03321
Received
17 October 2018
Accepted
20 December 2018
Published
16 January 2019
Volume
9 - 2018
Edited by
David B. Collinge, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
Reviewed by
George Newcombe, University of Idaho, United States; Huzefa A. Raja, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2019 Pereira, VÔzquez de Aldana, San Emeterio and Zabalgogeazcoa.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: IƱigo Zabalgogeazcoa, i.zabalgo@irnasa.csic.es
This article was submitted to Plant Microbe Interactions, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
