In the original article, there were mistakes in Table 1 as published. NA was stated as “not present” in the footnote of Table 1 of the original article. For some of the taxa in the table this was not true. Therefore, we replaced NAs with up or down arrows, and indicated TND as taxon not dominant. The corrected Table 1 appears below. The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Table 1
| Sample type | Intestinal content | Intestinal mucus | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
 | RII | RIII | RII | RIII |
| Acidobacteria |  | | | |
| Actinobacteria | | |  | |
| Fusobacteria | | | | |
| Deinococcus-Thermus | | | | |
| SR1 | | – | – | |
| Chloroflexi | | | – | – |
| Parcubacteria | | | | |
| Planctomycetes | | | | – |
| Lactobacillus fermentum | | | | |
| Lactobacillus paraplantarum | | | | |
| Colwellia aestuarii | | | | |
| Streptococcus sobrinus | | | | |
| Lewinella antarctica | | | | |
| Lactobacillus plantarum | | | | |
| Acinetobacter radioresistens | | | | |
| Novosphingobium sediminicola | | | | |
| Phyllobacterium myrsinacearum | | | | |
| Ralstonia pickettii | | | | |
| Stenotrophomonas maltophilia | | | TND | TND |
| Undibacterium oligocarboniphilm | | | TND | TND |
| Micrococcus luteus | | | | |
| Enterococcus cecorum | | – | TND | TND |
| Mycoplasma | | | | |
| Aquabacterium | | | | |
| Bradyrizhobium | | | | |
| Brevinema | | | | |
| Delftia | | | | |
| Methylobacterium | | | | |
| Aquabacterium parvum | | | | |
| Pelomonas | | | | |
| Photobacterium | | | | |
| Sphingomonas | | | | |
| Weissella | | | TND | TND |
| Brevinema andersonii | | | | |
| Pelomonas saccharophila | | | | – |
| Bradyrizhobium jicamae | | | | |
| Methylobacterium fujisawaense | | | | |
| Photobacterium phosphoreum | | | | |
| Aliivibrio logei | TND | TND | | |
| Caulobacter segnis | TND | TND | | |
| Cornybacterium | | | | |
| Propionibacterium acnes | TND | TND | | |
Changes in abundances of the bacterial taxa by LAB feeding.
Arrows indicate changes in abundance (blue arrow: increase, red arrow: decrease, bold black line: no change, TND: taxon not dominant).
Summary
Keywords
fish, Salmo salar, feed additive, probiotics, intestinal bacteria, Lactobacillus, microbiota, amplicon sequencing
Citation
Gupta S, Fečkaninová A, Lokesh J, Koščová J, Sørensen M, Fernandes J and Kiron V (2019) Corrigendum: Lactobacillus Dominate in the Intestine of Atlantic Salmon Fed Dietary Probiotics. Front. Microbiol. 10:1094. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01094
Received
08 March 2019
Accepted
30 April 2019
Published
15 May 2019
Volume
10 - 2019
Edited by
Konstantinos Papadimitriou, Agricultural University of Athens, Greece
Reviewed by
Atte Von Wright, University of Eastern Finland, Finland
Updates
Copyright
© 2019 Gupta, Fečkaninová, Lokesh, Koščová, Sørensen, Fernandes and Kiron.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Viswanath Kiron kiron.viswanath@nord.no
This article was submitted to Systems Microbiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.