GENERAL COMMENTARY article

Front. Microbiol., 28 August 2019

Sec. Evolutionary and Genomic Microbiology

Volume 10 - 2019 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02011

Commentary: Complete Genome Sequence of 3-Chlorobenzoate-Degrading Bacterium Cupriavidus necator NH9 and Reclassification of the Strains of the Genera Cupriavidus and Ralstonia Based on Phylogenetic and Whole-Genome Sequence Analyses

  • 1. Centre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia

  • 2. Deakin Genomics Centre, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia

  • 3. School of Science, Monash University Malaysia, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia

Moriuchi et al. reported a comprehensive reclassification of bacterial strains from the genera Cupriavidus and Ralstonia based on percentage of conserved proteins (POCP), average nucleotide identity (ANI), multilocus sequence analysis and 16S rRNA gene sequence. In the study, conflicting results were repeatedly observed for the taxonomic classification of strain PBA that was initially identified as Ralstonia sp. PBA based on 16S rRNA gene sequence (Gan et al., 2011b; Moriuchi et al., 2019).

Strain PBA was isolated as a co-culture with Hydrogenophaga intermedia PBC from textile wastewater a decade ago. The co-culture could grow on 4-aminobenzenesulfonate (4-ABS), a recalcitrant dye intermediate (Wagner and Reid, 1931), as the sole nitrogen, carbon, and sulfur source to a relatively high cell density (Gan et al., 2011b). In this syntrophic relationship, strain PBA is the sole provider of p-aminobenzoate, an essential vitamin required for the growth of H. intermedia PBC, the main 4-ABS degrader (Gan et al., 2011a, 2017). In light of new genomic resources, the initial taxonomic assignment of strain PBA has also been previously questioned by Kim and Gan (2017) given its closer phylogenetic affiliation to the genus Cupriavidus than to the genus Ralstonia. Unfortunately, both recent genome-based taxonomic classifications of strain PBA (Kim and Gan, 2017; Moriuchi et al., 2019) suffered from incomplete and biased taxon sampling (restricted mostly to members from the genus Ralstonia and Cupriavidus) that can result in the misinterpretation of evolutionary relationships (Heath et al., 2008). The taxonomic affiliation of strain PBA should be inferred from a comprehensive phylogenomic analysis that includes all genera with genome availability from the family Burkholderiaceae.

A total of 428 Burkholderiaceae (including strain PBA) and 15 non-Burkholderiaceae genome assemblies were obtained from the NCBI RefSeq database (accessed on 30th May 2019). The genomes were processed using two microbial phylogenomic analysis pipelines e.g., GToTree v1.2.1 (Lee, 2019) and PhylophlAN v0.99 (Segata et al., 2013) that identify single copy bacterial genes (GToTree: n = 203, Betaproteobacteria HMM set; PhylophIAN: n = 400) and produce concatenated protein alignment. Maximum likelihood tree construction from the protein alignments used IQTree v.1.6.8 with 1,000 ultrafast bootstrap replicates (Nguyen et al., 2014). In both phylogenomic trees, the Ralstonia and Cupriavidus clusters received maximal support and are sister taxa to the exclusion of strain PBA (Figures 1A,B). The updated phylogenomic placement of strain PBA in light of extensive taxon sampling precludes its genus assignment to the genus Ralstonia or Cupriavidus and suggests that it is a member of a hitherto undescribed genus within the family Burkholderiaceae. Within the Genome Taxonomy Database (Parks et al., 2018) that inferred standardized bacteria taxonomy from conserved proteins present in 143,512 bacterial genomes (GTDB release R04-RS89), strain PBA was still assigned to its own genus (g__AKCV01) despite an even more extensive taxon sampling of 4,378 genomes from the family Burkholderiaceae (https://gtdb.ecogenomic.org/tree?r=g__AKCV01 accessed on 1st August 2019).

Figure 1

Given the concordance observed from these independent analyses, the taxonomic assignment of strain PBA has been updated from Ralstonia sp. PBA to Burkholderiaceae sp. PBA in the NCBI database (Bioproject: PRJNA78957; BioSample: SAMN02471424) (Gan et al., 2012) pending future genus description. To facilitate future strain description and comparison, strain PBA has been deposited in the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures GmbH (DSMZ) under the accession number DSM 106616. Furthermore, the concatenated alignments, uncollapsed phylogenomic trees and genome information are also made available in the Zenodo database (http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3258920).

Statements

Author contributions

HG performed data analysis and wrote the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Deakin Centre of Integrative Ecology.

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful to the Deakin Centre of Integrative Ecology for financial support.

Conflict of interest

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  • 1

    GanH. M.ChewT. H.TayY.-L.LyeS. F.YahyaA. (2012). Genome sequence of Ralstonia sp. strain PBA, a bacterium involved in the biodegradation of 4-aminobenzenesulfonate. Am. Soc. Microbiol. 194, 5139–5140. 10.1128/JB.01165-12

  • 2

    GanH. M.IbrahimZ.ShahirS.YahyaA. (2011a). Identification of genes involved in the 4-aminobenzenesulfonate degradation pathway of Hydrogenophaga sp. PBC via transposon mutagenesis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.318, 108–114. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2011.02245.x

  • 3

    GanH. M.LeeY. P.AustinC. M. (2017). Nanopore long-read guided complete genome assembly of Hydrogenophaga intermedia, and genomic insights into 4-aminobenzenesulfonate, p-aminobenzoic acid and hydrogen metabolism in the genus Hydrogenophaga. Front. Microbiol.8:1880. 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01880

  • 4

    GanH. M.ShahirS.IbrahimZ.YahyaA. (2011b). Biodegradation of 4-aminobenzenesulfonate by Ralstonia sp. PBA and Hydrogenophaga sp. PBC isolated from textile wastewater treatment plant. Chemosphere82, 507–513. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.10.094

  • 5

    HeathT. A.ZwicklD. J.KimJ.HillisD. M. (2008). Taxon sampling affects inferences of macroevolutionary processes from phylogenetic trees. Syst. Biol.57, 160–166. 10.1080/10635150701884640

  • 6

    KimK.GanH. M. (2017). A glimpse into the genetic basis of symbiosis between Hydrogenophaga and their helper strains in the biodegradation of 4-aminobenzenesulfonate. J. Genomics5, 77–82. 10.7150/jgen.20216

  • 7

    LeeM. D. (2019). GToTree: a user-friendly workflow for phylogenomics. Bioinformatics. btz188. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz188

  • 8

    MoriuchiR.DohraH.KanesakiY.OgawaN. (2019). Complete genome sequence of 3-chlorobenzoate-degrading bacterium Cupriavidus necator NH9 and reclassification of the strains of the genera Cupriavidus and Ralstonia based on phylogenetic and whole-genome sequence analyses. Front. Microbiol.10:133. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00133

  • 9

    NguyenL.-T.SchmidtH. A.Von HaeselerA.MinhB. Q. (2014). IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evolu.32, 268–274. 10.1093/molbev/msu300

  • 10

    ParksD. H.ChuvochinaM.WaiteD. W.RinkeC.SkarshewskiA.ChaumeilP.-A.et al. (2018). A standardized bacterial taxonomy based on genome phylogeny substantially revises the tree of life. Nat. Biotechnol.36, 996–1004. 10.1038/nbt.4229

  • 11

    SegataN.BörnigenD.MorganX. C.HuttenhowerC. (2013). PhyloPhlAn is a new method for improved phylogenetic and taxonomic placement of microbes. Nat. Commun.4:2304. 10.1038/ncomms3304

  • 12

    WagnerF. C.ReidE. E. (1931). The stability of the carbon–sulfur bond in some aliphatic sulfonic acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc.53, 3407–3413. 10.1021/ja01360a026

Summary

Keywords

Ralstonia, Burkholderiaceae, Cupriavidus, phylogenomics, taxonomy

Citation

Gan HM (2019) Commentary: Complete Genome Sequence of 3-Chlorobenzoate-Degrading Bacterium Cupriavidus necator NH9 and Reclassification of the Strains of the Genera Cupriavidus and Ralstonia Based on Phylogenetic and Whole-Genome Sequence Analyses. Front. Microbiol. 10:2011. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02011

Received

28 June 2019

Accepted

16 August 2019

Published

28 August 2019

Volume

10 - 2019

Edited by

Iain Sutcliffe, Northumbria University, United Kingdom

Reviewed by

Roberta Fulthorpe, University of Toronto Scarborough, Canada; Zhang Yong, Southwest University, China; Jorgen Johannes Leisner, University of Copenhagen, Denmark

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Han Ming Gan

This article was submitted to Evolutionary and Genomic Microbiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics