Although our knowledge of microbial diversity has been greatly advanced in recent decades, the majority of microorganisms remain uncultured and therefore poorly characterized. Two major approaches have been used in the study of uncultured microorganisms: cultivation-dependent and cultivation-independent. The later approach is based on the analysis of genomes assembled from metagenomes or obtained from single cells, providing predictions regarding the organism's metabolic capabilities and ecological functions (Rinke et al., 2013; Woyke et al., 2017; Nayfach et al., 2021). Application of cultivation-independent approaches to natural environments has greatly expanded the tree of life and revealed novel microbial lineages, most of which still has no cultured members (Rinke et al., 2013; Castelle and Banfield, 2018). However, comprehensive understanding of the biology of these microorganisms and their functions in environment requires the pure cultures (or co-cultures) and thus development of novel cultivation technologies (Sun et al., 2020; Lewis et al., 2021). With both approaches, rapid progress has been made in the field due to the development and application of a variety of new technologies, including in situ cultivation, high-throughput cultivation, application of resuscitation stimuli, cultivation after physical cell sorting, metagenomics and other “omics” technologies (Salam et al., 2021). Moreover, information that can be extracted from multi-omics data can be applied for the targeted isolation of yet uncultured microorganisms (Gutleben et al., 2018).
This Research Topic deals with recent advances in the cultivation, diversity, and physiology of previously uncultured microorganisms, with emphasis on developments and applications of novel technologies. It consists of six works.
The dilution-to-extinction culturing approach has been used in the cultivation of a number of oligotrophic marine bacteria since its early success in cultivating the marine SAR11 clade bacteria (Rappe et al., 2002). This approach was used to cultivate freshwater bacteria at a large scale in the work of Kim et al. In their work, bacterial growth was recorded for 14% of the total 5,376 inoculated wells. Using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, they showed that a large number of isolates belong to previously uncultured or underrepresented freshwater bacterial groups, including the acI, acIV, LD28, FukuN57, MNG9, and TRA3-20 lineages.
Some bacteria can produce molecules that promote or stimulate the growth of other bacteria. One such molecule called the resuscitation-promoting factor (Rpf) can induce bacterial resuscitation. In this Topic, Lopez Marin et al. showed that the heat-liable component of the Micrococcus luteus culture supernatant (containing Rpf) can increase the number and diversity of cultured bacterial taxa from a soil sample. This work also showed that the supernatant treatment allowed the cultivation of 51 previously uncultured potentially novel bacterial species.
The reasons for failing to cultivate microorganisms include the lack of correct nutrients, insufficient incubation time, inappropriate temperature or pH, need of specific growth signals, dependence on other microorganisms and many other factors. In their paper, Dahal et al. reported isolation of a bacterium, designated strain G-1-1-14T, from forest soil using low nutrient medium and long enrichment time. This strain represents a novel species for which the name Azohydromonas caseinilytica sp. nov. was proposed.
As a cultivation-independent method, 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing is the major approach in the elucidation of microbial diversity and the community structure at present. In the work of Wu et al., 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing was used to determine the composition of the gut microbiota of captive and wild oriental white storks. Their work revealed differences in the composition and diversity of gut microbiota under different breeding conditions.
With advances in sequencing technologies and bioinformatics approaches, hundreds and thousands of microbial genomes can be obtained from environmental metagenomes (Nayfach et al., 2021). Zhou et al. produced approximately 145 gigabases of metagenomic sequence data for the fecal samples from 11 Tibetan pigs, an important domestic animal in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. De novo assembly and binning recovered 322 metagenome-assembled genomes assigned to 11 bacterial and 2 archaeal phyla. 191 of these genomes represented the uncultivated microorganisms derived from novel prokaryotic taxa. Over 13,000 genes for carbohydrate-active enzymes were identified providing an expanded repertoire of biomass-degrading genes for future biotechnological applications.
Soil microorganisms historically have been a rich resource for natural product discovery, yet our knowledge of their biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) has been limited by culture- and PCR-biases. Santana-Pereira et al. applied so-called functional metagenomic approach to identify the biosynthetic potential of soil microorganisms. They constructed a large-insert metagenomic library in Escherichia coli from soil and screened the library clones for biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) using either PCR or a next generation sequencing. A total of 1,015 BGCs were detected from 19,200 clones, identifying 223 clones that carry a polyketide synthase and/or non-ribosomal peptide synthetase clusters, a dramatically improved hit rate compared to PCR screening. This study provided novel resources for natural product discovery and revealed heretofore undiscovered functional and phylogenetic diversity that have been captured in soil genomic resources.
Funding
B-BX was funded by the Young Scholars Program of Shandong University (Grant No. 2016WLJH41) and the Youth Interdisciplinary Science and Innovative Research Groups of Shandong University (Grant No. 2020QNQT006). ML was funded by the Innovation Team Project of Universities in Guangdong Province (Grant No. 2020KCXTD023) and the Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (Grant No. JCYJ20200109105010363). NR was funded by the Russian Science Foundation (Grant No. 19-14-00245).
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Author contributions
B-BX, ML, KA, and NR co-edited the Research Topic and wrote the editorial. All authors approved the submitted version.
Acknowledgments
We thank the Frontiers Editorial Office for their assistance in completing this Research Topic.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
CastelleC. J.BanfieldJ. F. (2018). Major new microbial groups expand diversity and alter our understanding of the tree of life. Cell172, 1181–1197. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.016
2
GutlebenJ.Chaib De MaresM.van ElsasJ. D.SmidtH.OvermannJ.SipkemaD. (2018). The multi-omics promise in context: from sequence to microbial isolate. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 44, 212–229. 10.1080/1040841X.2017.1332003
3
LewisW. H.TahonG.GeesinkP.SousaD. Z.EttemaT. J. (2021). Innovations to culturing the uncultured microbial majority. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 19:225–240. 10.1038/s41579-020-00458-8
4
NayfachS.RouxS.SeshadriR.UdwaryD.VargheseN.SchulzF.et al. (2021). A genomic catalog of Earth's microbiomes. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 499–509. 10.1038/s41587-020-0718-6
5
RappeM. S.ConnonS. A.VerginK. L.GiovannoniS. J. (2002). Cultivation of the ubiquitous SAR11 marine bacterioplankton clade. Nature418, 630–633. 10.1038/nature00917
6
RinkeC.SchwientekP.SczyrbaA.IvanovaN. N.AndersonI. J.ChengJ. F.et al. (2013). Insights into the phylogeny and coding potential of microbial dark matter. Nature499, 431–437. 10.1038/nature12352
7
SalamN.XianW.-D.AsemM. D.XiaoM.LiW.-J. (2021). From ecophysiology to cultivation methodology: filling the knowledge gap between uncultured and cultured microbes. Mar. Life Sci. Technol.3, 132–147. 10.1007/s42995-020-00064-w
8
SunY.LiuY.PanJ.WangF.LiM. (2020). Perspectives on cultivation strategies of Archaea. Microb. Ecol. 79, 770–784. 10.1007/s00248-019-01422-7
9
WoykeT.DoudD. F. R.SchulzF. (2017). The trajectory of microbial single-cell sequencing. Nat. Methods14, 1045–1054. 10.1038/nmeth.4469
Summary
Keywords
uncultured microorganisms, cultivation techniques, single-cell genomics, metagenomics, microbial diversity
Citation
Xie B-B, Li M, Anantharaman K and Ravin NV (2021) Editorial: The Uncultured Microorganisms: Novel Technologies and Applications. Front. Microbiol. 12:756287. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.756287
Received
10 August 2021
Accepted
04 November 2021
Published
24 November 2021
Volume
12 - 2021
Edited by
John R. Battista, Louisiana State University, United States
Reviewed by
Xiao-Hua Zhang, Ocean University of China, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Xie, Li, Anantharaman and Ravin.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Nikolai V. Ravin nravin@biengi.ac.ru; nravin@mail.ru
This article was submitted to Evolutionary and Genomic Microbiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.