Abstract
Bacteria have brought great harm to the public, especially after the emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria. This has rendered traditional antibiotic therapy ineffective. In recent years, hyperthermia has offered new treatments to remove bacteria. Microwaves (MW) are a component of the electromagnetic spectrum and can rapidly heat materials. Taking advantage of this characteristic of MW, related studies have shown that both thermal and non-thermal effects of MW can inactivate various bacteria. Even though the understanding of MW in the field of bacteria is not sufficient for widespread use at present, MW has performed well in dealing with microorganisms and controlling infection. This review will focus on the application of MW in bacteria and discuss the advantages, prospects and challenges of using MW in the bacterial field.
Introduction
Bacteria have threatened human health for thousands of years (Fournier et al., 2013), and antibiotic treatment has been used for antibacterial activity. However, with the overuse and inappropriate use of antibiotics, bacterial multidrug resistance has emerged, making it difficult to control and eliminate bacterial infections (Ghosh et al., 2019; Monserrat-Martinez et al., 2019). Bacterial infections are a serious challenge, with 700,000 patients currently dying each year from drug-resistant infections, and the total number of deaths will rise to 10 million per year from 2050 if urgent attention is not given (Tagliabue and Rappuoli, 2018). Sadly, this tragedy is difficult to reverse because biofilms protect bacteria and promote their resistance, and the development of antibacterial methods lags behind bacterial resistance. Biofilms are a major problem for antibacterial methods (Hathroubi et al., 2017; Yin et al., 2019). Biofilms are an advanced form of microbial community protection in which bacterial cells can significantly evade host immune responses, mediate desiccation tolerance and resist antimicrobial therapy, causing animal and plant diseases and threatening medical infections (Holmes et al., 2016; Hathroubi et al., 2017; Wood, 2017; Yin et al., 2019). Currently, at least two-thirds of clinical infections are associated with biofilms, and these patients cannot be cured by antibiotic therapy alone (Wolfmeier et al., 2018; Dostert et al., 2019). Furthermore although many antibacterial methods have been developed (Shi et al., 2016; Sun et al., 2018; Ghosh et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2021; Wang and Sun, 2021) in the past few years, including near-infrared (NIR) light irradiation (Han et al., 2021), ultrasonic irradiation (Rezek Jambrak et al., 2018; Shu et al., 2021), pulsed electric fields (PEF) (Gabrić et al., 2018; Garner, 2019), nanoparticle-based topical antimicrobial drug delivery (Gao et al., 2018; Van Giau et al., 2019), nanomaterials (Makabenta et al., 2021), antimicrobial/biofilm peptides (Dostert et al., 2019), and bacteriophages, bacterial resistance extends beyond antibiotic use (Ghosh et al., 2019), encompassing changes in temperature (Ojha et al., 2016), nutrient limitation (Maisonneuve et al., 2018), pH (Helaine et al., 2014), and other factors (Fisher et al., 2017). Once resistance is obtained, new resistant strains will gradually replace susceptible strains (Holmes et al., 2016). Therefore, new methods to eliminate bacterial infections are urgently needed.
In recent years, microwaves (MWs) have performed well in the treatment of tumors, and have become a relatively novel and popular tumor treatment method (Ruiter et al., 2019; Cazzato et al., 2021). However, their ability to eliminate bacterial infections has not received enough attention. MW as a component of the electromagnetic spectrum, are non-ionizing radiation with frequencies ranging from 300 MHz to 300 GHz, and wavelengths between 1 m and 1 mm (Mawioo et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2019a; Shaw et al., 2021). The effects of MW include thermal and non-thermal (Rougier et al., 2014; Shaw et al., 2021), and it is generally believed that the temperature increase caused by MW exposure plays a key role in microorganism inactivation (Rougier et al., 2014; Shaw et al., 2021). The MW-based thermal effect is different from conventional heating (Shaw et al., 2021), involving the dielectric properties of polar substance molecules, which have a shorter heating time than conventional heating. More importantly, MW-based non-thermal effects can destroy microorganisms at temperatures below the thermal destruction point, which can disrupt cell membranes and increase the amount of DNA and proteins released from cells (Woo et al., 2000; Shaw et al., 2021). There are several advantages of MW, including traveling at the speed of light, delivering energy directly to objects, being easily to controlled, enabling deep penetration capabilities, rapidly heating, and causing negligible damage to healthy cells and tissues (Vogl et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2017; Chen et al., 2020; Papini et al., 2020; Ricci et al., 2020; Weiss et al., 2020). Although the inactivation ability of MW to microorganisms has been summarized in some reviews (Cui et al., 2022; Skowron et al., 2022), the content is inclined to the treatment of food and liquid by MW. This review is more inclined to the role of MW in the field of biomedicine.
Therefore, to better understand the infection controlling ability of microwaves and to broaden the horizon on microwave clinical utility, this article will review the current status, existing problems and prospects of MW elimination of bacterial infections.
Application of microwaves in controlling bacteria
Inactivated bacteria
Most pathogenic bacteria can multiply between 33 and 41°C (Mackowiak, 1981). When the temperature increases, the proliferation and mobility of bacteria are inhibited (Ibelli et al., 2018). Studies (Tsuchido et al., 1985; Menezes and Teixeira, 1992; Ibelli et al., 2018) have shown that the outer membrane of gram-negative Escherichia coli undergoes reversible disruption above 46°C, and furthermore, exposure of E. coli to 45°C for 10 min reduces protein synthesis. Due to the dipolar nature of water, when water is exposed to MW, the dipolar water molecules rearrange in the direction of the electric field. The high frequency of MW induces billions of oscillations per second of intracellular ions and polar molecules, and its intense friction causes very rapid heating. Therefore, microbial inactivation by MW is mainly concentrated in liquids, solids, and food with a moisture content higher than 50%. In recent studies, MW has been used in other situations, such as airborne microbial inactivation (Table 1).
TABLE 1
| Experimental setup | ||||||
| MW frequency (GHz) | Energy/power | Exposure temperature (°C) | Exposure time | Biological target/object | Effects | References |
| – | 700 W | 100 | 3 min | Retorted vegetables | MW reduced the bacteria level by 103CFU/g. | Cho and Chung, 2020 |
| 0.915 | 6 kW | 90 | 5 min | Peanut butter | L. monocytogenes, E. coli O157:H7 and S. Typhimurium in peanut butter was reduced. | Song and Kang, 2016 |
| 2.45 | 600 W | 100 | 5 min | Sludge | MW pretreatment could remove 13.5–35.5% of ARBs in the pH range down from 10 to 2.5. | Tong et al., 2016 |
| 2.45 | 465 W | 71 | 1 min | Sludge | After the exposure to MW irradiation, in a 20 g sludge sample, the concentration of E. Coli decreased to below than analytical detection levels. | Mawioo et al., 2016 |
| – | 260 W/m3 | 100 | 20 s | E. coli | MW irradiation induced airborne E. coli lysis of 4.1 log reduction in 20 s. | Wang et al., 2019b |
| 2.45 | 800 W | 25–100 | 1 min | C. difficile spore | After MW treatment, C. difficile spore complete inactivation in aqueous suspension at 107 CFU/ml. | Ojha et al., 2016 |
| 2.45 | 700 W | – | 1.5 min | B. subtilis spores and Pseudomonas fluorescens | Under MW irradiation, only 35% of B. subtilis spores survived and 5.8% of Pseudomonas fluorescens survived. | Wu and Yao, 2010 |
| 2.45 | 750 W | – | 1.5 min | B. subtilis spores | B. subtilis spores achieved 3 log disinfection. | Zhang et al., 2010 |
| 2.45 | 500 W | – | 1.5 min | E. coli | E. coli under the detection limit. | Zhang et al., 2010 |
| 4.592 | 650 W | – | 3 min | Polymethyl methacrylate disks | MW combination for 3 min reduced C. albicans biofilm formation. | Martinez-Serna et al., 2021 |
| 2.45 | 150 W | 70–110 | 5 min | Bacillus cereus biofilms | MW irradiation achieved complete inactivation of Bacillus cereus biofilms. | Park et al., 2017 |
A summary of the destruction of bacteria by MW in vitro.
Solid medium
Beginning in the 21st century, increasing attention was paid to food safety and nutrition (Pollock et al., 2017). Pathogens in food cause many diseases, especially gastrointestinal diseases (Boyle et al., 2007; Robertson et al., 2016). As a common method to control foodborne pathogens, conventional thermal treatment destroys physicochemical and sensory properties (Mandal et al., 2020), which has led to new processing methods that can ensure safety and preserve the nutritional and sensory quality of food products. One study (Cho and Chung, 2020) showed that MW can reduced the bacterial level by 103CFU/g in retorted vegetables (700 W, 3 min), and uses less energy than steam (70–80%) at 100°C for 20 min. MW irradiation can simultaneously maintain good quality and control the levels of microorganisms in retorted vegetables. Song and Kang (2016) evaluated the efficacy of MW to inactivate pathogens in peanut butter. When treated with 6 kW MW for 5 min, the L. monocytogenes, E. coli O157:H7 and S. typhimurium in peanut butter were reduced (by more than 3 logs, 4 logs and 5 logs respectively). Moreover, the concentration of S. typhimurium was under the detection limit (1.0 log CFU/g).
In recent years, wastewater has been recognized as a major source of antibiotic resistance (Zhang et al., 2009; LaPara et al., 2011). Numerous studies have shown that sludge and biosolids from wastewater treatment plants contain many antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB; Munir et al., 2011; Naquin et al., 2015). A study by Tong et al. (2016) showed that pretreatment with MW could reduce ARB during sludge anaerobic digestion. The MW reactor was operated at 600 W with a stirring rate of 50 rpm, the reaction time was set to 5 min, and the heating rate was 16°C/min from 20 to 100°C. A total of 500 mL of egg-shaped digester inlet sludge samples was pretreated under different pH conditions. The results showed that MW pretreatment could remove 13.5–35.5% of ARBs (0.55–5.04 log) in the pH range from 10 to 2.5. Mawioo et al. (2016) showed that exposure of a 20 g sludge sample to MW irradiation reduced the concentration of E. Coli to below analytical detection levels (i.e., b1000 CFU/g TS), when samples were treated with 456 W for more than 1 min (i.e., MW energy = 8 Wh, temperature = 71°C). Moreover, this pathogen reduction was the time- and radiation power-dependent, which means that we can change the radiation power or exposure time to obtain the desired bacterial reduction. Generally, MW reduces bacteria in sludge with high efficiency and low energy consumption.
The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a severe and international shortage of filtering facepiece respirators. He et al. (2020), showed that MW irradiation achieved 100% bacterial inactivation (>4 log reduction) of E. coli and B. subtilis in 30 min, at 400 W output power (to avoid damage to the filtering facepiece respirators from prolonged exposure to MW, the single treatment time in the experiment was no more than 5 min), which is less time-consuming than 90 min of steam. Moreover, this filtering facepiece respirator regeneration did not affect the filtration performance. The quantified respirator fit and function preservation after MW irradiation were also reported in another study (Zulauf et al., 2020).
Air and water
Bioaerosols are airborne microbial cells with debris and particulate matter of any biological origin (Liang et al., 2012). These small particles can cause infectious diseases, acute toxic reactions and allergies (Gergen, 2001). Because of the pandemics of severe acute respiratory syndrome and influenza H1N1 viral infections, bioaerosols have attracted worldwide attention. Recently, one study (Wang et al., 2019b) showed that MW irradiation (260 W/m3) induced airborne E. coli lysis with a 4.1 log reduction in 20 s (Figure 1), releasing endotoxins from E. coli by heating. In addition, MW irradiation degraded endotoxins, achieving a 35% removal efficiency when the temperature increased to 200°C. In a further study (Wang et al., 2019a), MW irradiation showed nearly 20 times the inactivation rate of airborne E. coli than of waterborne E. coli, which was because water absorbed most of the MW energy (92.3%) to increase the temperature rather than kill bacteria. The more absorbed energy could be used to inactive airborne bacteria. Finally, E. coli requires 2.3 J and 116.9 J energy, respectively, for each log of inactivation of airborne and waterborne disease.
FIGURE 1
SEM images of E. coli(A) before MW irradiation and (B) after MW irradiation (Wang et al., 2019b).
Spores act as vectors for bacteria, which can cause severe disease (Peng et al., 2018). The study showed (Ojha et al., 2016) that, after MW treatment at 800 W for 60 s, C. difficile spores were completely inactivated in an aqueous suspension at 107 CFU/ml. However, this was not observed in conductively heated spores (Figure 2). Wu and Yao (2010) investigated the survival of bioaerosols after MW irradiation (2450 MHz, 700 W). Under 1.5 min MW irradiation, only 35% of B. subtilis spores survived, and 5.8% of Pseudomonas fluorescens survived. Another study (Zhang et al., 2010) compared the MW irradiation effects of E. coli and B. subtilis spore bioaerosols. The results showed that B. subtilis spores were more difficult to destroy and required irradiation at 750 W for 90 s to achieve three logs of disinfection. However, the viability of E. coli was below the detection limit at 500 W for 90 s.
FIGURE 2
(A) Survival of C. difficile spores following microwave irradiation and conductive heating. (B) Survival of C. difficile spores following conductive heating. (C) Transmission electron micrographs of C. difficile spores following microwave irradiation and conductive heating (Ojha et al., 2016).
One study (Kuo et al., 2016) showed that magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) can selectively trap bacteria when exposed to MW heating for 60 s, which could be due to their high specific surface area and magnetic properties. In this way, S. aureus can be identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry. However, this method can trap only a few tens of bacteria in a small sample (20 μL).
It is clear from the above studies that MW irradiation is a simple and time-saving treatment that inactivates airborne and water-suspended microorganisms, thereby reducing the risk of bacterial infection.
Reducing antibiotic resistance
Antibiotic resistant bacteria have become a global health crisis, and China, as one of the world’s largest producers and consumers of antibiotics, is witnessing this crisis (Qiao et al., 2018). The overuse of antimicrobials and the enrichment of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) have caused the emergence of ARB as well as environmental protection. Antibiotics and ARGs are widely distributed in surface water, wastewater treatment plant effluent, soil and animal manure (Pruden et al., 2006; Qiao et al., 2018), which reduces the bacterial therapeutic potential in humans and animals (Wright, 2010). Therefore, it is urgent to develop a novel method for degrading ARGs and antibiotics in the environment.
One study (Kor-Bicakci et al., 2020) conducted research on triclosan (TCS), a persistent, poisonous, bioaccumulative antimicrobial found at high concentrations in wastewater (McAvoy et al., 2002). The results (Kor-Bicakci et al., 2020) showed that, compared with anaerobic digestion, MW pretreatment could easily degrade TCS (from lower than 25–46%), and a higher digestion temperature led to a higher degradation rate. Spiramycin, another high concentration antibiotic in wastewater (Zhu et al., 2014; Klein et al., 2018), can also be mitigated by MW. The related results from one study (Chen et al., 2019) showed that spiramycin (100 mg/L) was rapidly and completely removed after 8 min of reaction with silicotungstic acid under 200 W MW irradiation. MW irradiation alone removed 30.1%, and silicotungstic acid alone removed 15.9%. The degradation rates were positively correlated with MW power and interaction time. In another study (Tong et al., 2016), the relative concentration of ARGs was lower than that of sludge anaerobic digestion after combined MW (600 W) pretreatment.
Destroying biofilms
In the food and medical industries, biofilms can cause serious problems (van Wolferen et al., 2018). Biofilms in processing equipment pose a threat to product safety and can lead to consumer health concerns (Alav et al., 2018). In clinical medicine, approximately 80% of chronic infections are associated with biofilms (Caputo et al., 2018), such as those in surgical implants. Elevated temperature resulted in a lower elastic modulus and stiffness of staphylococcal biofilms, which may be beneficial for biofilm removal (Ibelli et al., 2018). Many studies (Li et al., 2019; Elbourne et al., 2020; Wang Q et al., 2021) have shown that a magnetic field can effectively destroy biofilms, furthermore, magnetic hyperthermia can further affect biofilm damage. This effect can be found in both gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial biofilms (Elbourne et al., 2020), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) biofilms (Li et al., 2019), and Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms (Wang Q et al., 2021).
As a component of the electromagnetic spectrum, MW can generate electromagnetic fields, and the strength of the electromagnetic field is positively correlated with the frequency of the MW (Nguyen et al., 2015). One study (Martinez-Serna et al., 2021) tested whether hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) immersion and MW exposure could exhibit the antibacterial effect of C. albicans biofilms on the surface of polymethyl methacrylate discs, showing that H2O2 alone could not eliminate the formation of C. albicans biofilms; however, the 650 W MW combination for 3 min reduced C. albicans biofilm formation. With high resistance to physical and chemical treatments (Andersson et al., 1995). Park et al. (2017) showed that the inactivation of Bacillus cereus biofilms by conventional heating requires a temperature of 108°C for 15 min. MW irradiation (150 W) achieved complete inactivation within 5 min, which was observed by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) (Figure 3).
FIGURE 3
CLSM images (×40) of B. cereus spores in biofilms. (A,B) Before MW and (C,D) after microwave irradiation. Green fluorescence: living cells and dead cells; red fluorescence: dead cells (Park et al., 2017).
Monitoring and identifying bacteria
In many clinical diseases (such as sepsis and prostheses joint infection), rapid treatment is associated with reduced mortality and high-quality functional recovery (Karam et al., 2016). However, bacterial diagnosis and antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) are often delayed. Therefore, more rapid identification methods need to be developed to provide faster pathogen identification and AST, which can help optimize antibiotic prescribing, reduce resistance and prevent the spread of multidrug-resistance pathogens.
Microwaves can be used to identify pathogens. Gao et al. (2019) designed a nanotube-assisted microwave electroporation (NAME) method. In this method, carbon nanotubes are used as sensors that absorb microwave energy, which induces electroporation in the cell wall. Through this electroporation, intracellular probes of double-stranded nucleic acids targeting specific bacterial 16S rRNA and fluorophores can be delivered in bacteria by MW irradiation (2.45 GHz, 30S), when the probes are fed into the bacteria, fluorescence microscopy can observe the specific fluorescence of different pathogens (Figure 4). NAME can identify pathogens, and all of the processes take only 30 min. On the basis of the electroporation properties of WM, it has also been used to specifically identify Chlamydia trachomatis (Zhang et al., 2011; Melendez et al., 2013) and non-typhoidal Salmonella (Tennant et al., 2011).
FIGURE 4
Multiplex detection of E. coli and P. aeruginosa by NAME (Gao et al., 2019).
To achieve rapid AST, it is critical to have an instrument that can sensitively monitor bacterial proliferation. On this basis, AST can be achieved in a short time after coculture of antibiotics and bacteria. MW-based biosensors are a great tool, as the surrounding conductivity or loss tangent is constantly changing during bacterial growth, which results in a change in the resonance amplitude of the MW. One study (Jain et al., 2021a) showed a label-free and non-contact MW-based biosensor. This biosensor is a one-port microstrip ring resonator, and the operating frequency is 1.76 GHz, which can detect and monitor the growth of E. Coli. The perfect fitting between bacterial growth measurement by MW and the Gomperta growth model indicates that this MW-based biosensor has the potential for bacterial detection and monitoring. MW resonator sensors present the ability to monitor bacterial growth in liquid media, as well as in solid agar media. Another newly developed MW-based sensor (Mohammadi et al., 2020) showed good performance in monitoring the growth of E. coli on Luria-Bertani agar. The same result was found in another paper (Jain et al., 2021b), which illustrates that the MW split- ring resonator (1.76 GHz) monitors E. coli cultured on solid agar medium providing rapid, non-contact, invasive free sensing and monitoring. Jain et al. (2021b) conducted a further study on AST, and the results confirmed that AST can be monitored by adding the antibiotic to the solid agar medium where bacteria are cultured. The results they achieved show that the MW-based sensor can present antibiotic susceptibility within 6 h, which is quicker than the current AST methods (15 h). In summary, compared with the popular AST methods, this new method requires less time and is more amenable to the slow-growing bacteria.
Treating infection diseases
Currently, the popular methods of treating bacterial infections are photothermal therapy and photodynamic therapy, but these methods have poor penetration depth (Zhang et al., 2017; Wu et al., 2018b). Compared with solar light, MW can deeply penetrate tissues (Wang et al., 2017). A study (Ash et al., 2017) showed that in skin treatments, as the wavelength of light increases, so does the depth of light penetration, but only at a depth of millimeters. Mattsson et al. (2021) showed that microwaves can penetrate the muscle layer, which is a centimeter-level depth. With this ability, MW can be used to treat deep tissue infections. Recently, an increasing number of studies have focused on fabricating MW-sensitive nanomaterials to achieve MW specificity and selectivity against tumors (Wu et al., 2018b; Chen et al., 2020; Papini et al., 2020; Ricci et al., 2020; Weiss et al., 2020). However, the therapeutic potential of MW for bacterial infections should also receive more attention (Table 2).
TABLE 2
| Experimental setup | ||||||
| MW frequency (GHz) | Energy/power | Exposure temperature (°C) | Exposure time | Biological target/object | Effects | References |
| 2.45 | 25 W | 41–45 | 20 min/day for 7 days | Bone infection (Rat model) | MW can increase blood perfusion and kill bacteria. | Qi et al., 2019 |
| 2.45 | 0.1 W/cm2 | 50–55 | 20 min/day for 21 days | Osteomyelitis (Rabbit model) | This system, Fe3O4/CNT/Gent, is proven to efficiently target and eradicate MRSA-infected rabbit tibia osteomyelitis. | Qiao et al., 2020 |
| - | 8 W | 55 | 5 min | Osteomyelitis (Rabbit model) | MW thermal effects and ROS resulted in death of the bacteria | Wei et al., 2021 |
A summary of the destruction of bacteria by MW in vivo.
Osteomyelitis as a challenging orthopedic disease has a protracted treatment (Rao et al., 2011). Some new treatment methods (hyperbaric oxygen therapy, pulsed electromagnetic fields, ultrasound, laser, and extracorporeal shockwave) are still unsatisfactory due to the impaired local blood supply and tissue perfusion (Emara et al., 2011; Inanmaz et al., 2014). A recent study (Qi et al., 2019) showed that the MW energy can be absorbed by deep tissue and increase the temperature, which increases the local blood flow, and more drug can be delivered to the lesion site. The results showed that MW irradiation (25 W, 20 min per day for 7 days) and cefuroxime reduce bacterial counts compared with cefuroxime alone (p < 0.05), as MW can increase blood perfusion and kill bacteria. Moreover, another study (Qiao et al., 2020) demonstrated the ability of MW combined with nanoparticles to treat osteomyelitis. They showed that, similar to photosensitizers in photodynamic therapy, MW therapy also has a sensitizer, Fe3O4/CNT as an MW sensitizer, and gentamicin as an antibiotic to treat MRSA-infected osteomyelitis. Fe3O4 and MW (2.45 GHz, 0.1 W/cm2) endow the nanoparticles with magnetic targeting and precise MW caloric therapy, which benefit the achievement of dramatic antibacterial effectiveness in deep tissue. Wei et al. (2021) developed a Prussian blue (PB) MOF as an MV-responsive material for the rapid treatment of osteomyelitis. PB MOFs are excellent at converting MV energy into heat and releasing iron ions. This results in increased permeability of the bacterial membrane to iron ions, which induces bacterial death through the production of highly harmful OH via the Fenton reaction. This of course results in a beneficial effect on superficial infections. In a mouse subcutaneous MRSA infection model, the novel nanoparticle PFG-IL/ZrO2-Ag@SiO2 combined with MW irradiation showed favorable effects both in vitro and in vivo (Wu et al., 2018b).
Mechanisms
The mechanism of action of MW irradiation on bacteria is controversial (Shamis et al., 2012), and most scholars believe that there are two major mechanisms, thermal effects and non-thermal effects. One study (Cao et al., 2018) that compared the thermal effects of MW on cell membranes, cell walls, soluble chemical oxygen demand, enzyme inactivation and dysfunction, found that the non-thermal effects of MW (below 40°C) were more effective in destroying microorganisms. However, which type of cellular damage caused by each of these two mechanisms remains controversial. Therefore, we explain the mechanism by which MWs act on bacteria according to different types of cell damage.
Membrane level
In terms of cell membrane damage, both thermal and non-thermal effects of MW exist. Meanwhile, this membrane damage is MW energy-dependent and MW working time-dependent (Table 3).
TABLE 3
| Experimental setup | ||||||
| MW frequency (GHz) | Energy/power | Exposure temperature (°C) | Exposure time (min) | Biological target/object | Effects | References |
| 18 | 1500 kW/m3 | 20–40 | 1 | E. coli | Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)- conjugated dextran (150 kDa) was taken up by the MW-treated cells, suggesting that pores had formed within the cell membrane. | Shamis et al., 2011 |
| 18 | 5.0 kW/kg | <40 | 1 | Four cocci: Planococcus maritimus, Staphylococcus aureus, S. aureus and S. epidermidis | Exposing the bacteria to an EMF induced permeability in the bacterial membranes of all strains studied. | Nguyen et al., 2015 |
| 37.01 | 0.4 mW/cm2 20 mW | <40 | – | E. coli | MW irradiation can transform the dynamic structural state of adsorbed water phases on biopolymer surfaces, which affect transport of ions K+ and H+ through the cellular membrane. | Kuznetsov et al., 2017 |
| 2.45 | 1800 W | 85 | 5 | Bacillus Cereus | MW results in the inactivation of Bacillus cereus by disrupting the cell membrane. | Cao et al., 2018 |
| – | 2000 W | 100 | 2 | B. subtilis | MW irradiation includes damage to the microbial cell wall. | Kim et al., 2008 |
A summary of the bacterial membrane damage by MW.
Under low-energy and short-term MW irradiation, MW at sublethal temperature (40°C) can affect the permeability of bacterial cell membranes. A study (Shamis et al., 2011) on the effects of MW radiation showed that E. coli cells exhibited significantly different cell morphologies from negative controls after MW exposure, and CLSM showed that fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated dextran (150 kDa) was taken up by MW-treated cells. Another study (Nguyen et al., 2015) demonstrated this permeability of the bacterial membrane by detecting traces of leaking cytosolic fluid. Kuznetsov et al. (2017) conducted a study on E. coli and showed that MW irradiation (<10 mW/cm2) could transform the dynamic structural state of adsorbed water phases on biopolymer surfaces, which affect transport of K+ and H+ ions through the cellular membrane. However, this effect of the bacterial membrane appears to be temporary, as cell morphology can be restored, and bacterial survival rates reach as high as 84–88% (Shamis et al., 2011; Nguyen et al., 2015). This change in membrane permeability caused by MW is different from electroporation caused by PEF or high-energy electromagnetic fields (Garner et al., 2013). Electroporation requires a strong transmembrane potential, and the electroporation threshold decreases with the increase of the transmembrane thermal gradient (Gabrić et al., 2018; Garner, 2019). When the field strength is large enough, electroporation will be irreversible (Gabrić et al., 2018). One study (Katsuki et al., 2007) had also demonstrated that low-Hz PEF can cause changes in membrane permeability rather than electroporation. Recent studies have shown that MW induces a thermal gradient across the membrane (Garner et al., 2013), which reduces the transmembrane potential for microwave-induced electroporation (Song et al., 2017; Garner, 2019), which may explain NAME when nanotubes are combined with MW (Gao et al., 2019). It is possible that the nanotubes exacerbate the thermal gradient across the membrane under the action of MW.
Under high-energy and long-term MW irradiation, MWs can disrupt the integrity of the bacterial cell membrane and inactive bacteria. Cao et al. (2018) used Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) analysis to show that MW irradiation (1800 W, 85°C for 5 min), led to severe morphological disruption of the cell membrane, resulting in the release of nuclear components and proteins from the cytoplasm. In Kim’s study (Kim et al., 2008), the authors attributed this release of nuclear components and proteins to disruption of the cytoplasmic membrane by MW (2000 W, for 2 min), which is not observed following conventional heating (boiling, for 10 min).
In summary, we can find that when MW acts on bacteria with lower power and shorter acting time at non-lethal temperature, the membrane permeability of bacteria is changed. This provides new ideas for the development of new methods for MW-assisted gene therapy, drug delivery, and substance extraction. When MW acts on bacteria with higher power and longer action time at lethal temperature, the bacterial membrane and cytoplasmic membrane are irreversibly damaged, which can directly lead to bacterial death. This indicates that it is feasible to use MW to kill bacteria and disinfect in the fields of biology and hygiene, and it has been reported (Hoff et al., 2021; Tilley et al., 2021) that MW systems have been implemented for the killing of pathogens in the air.
Metabolic level
One study (Cao et al., 2018) showed that the expression of 23 Bacillus cereus proteins was regulated after MW (2000 W, for 2 min) treatment. These proteins include carbohydrate metabolism-related enzymes, such as L-lactate dehydrogenase, transaldolase and malate dehydrogenase, fructose bisphosphate aldolase and triose phosphate isomerase. In addition, all enzymes were involved in amino acid or protein metabolism, except histidine dipeptidase. Moreover, Mn-SOD, an enzyme that can effectively scavenge free radicals generated by metabolism and protect cells against oxidative damage, was downregulated. These effects were attributed to megawatt radiation.
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) play a very important role in bactericidal activity, which occurs through a decline in antioxidant mechanisms, such as a drop in glutathione (GSH) levels. Shaw et al. (2021) showed that MW exposure induced the production of intracellular ROS and decreased GSH levels in E. coli and S. aureus, which contributed to the inactivation of both bacteria.
Genetic level
Some studies have suggested that MW functions at the genetic level (Ruediger, 2009; Torgomyan and Trchounian, 2013). Research has shown that (Tong et al., 2016), after combined MW pretreatment, the ARG concentration was lower than that after sludge anaerobic digestion alone. Another study (Shaw et al., 2021) conducted further experiments of genetic damage of MW on bacteria, and showed that MW irradiation caused oxidative stress-mediated DNA damage. Furthermore, when E. coli was exposed to MW, the transcriptional gene expression levels of six oxidative stress genes were reduced, including SoxS, OxyR, KatG, RpoE, GroES, and DnaK.
Prospects and challenges
Perspectives
In vitro, compared with traditional autoclaving, MW irradiation can generate highly concentrated energy pulses in a limited time, directly penetrating and heating the material without any intermediate heat transfer medium (Vogl et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2012). Compared with chemical sterilization, MW sterilization is more environmentally friendly (Goel et al., 2014). Given that high-power, long-term MW can effectively destroy bacterial cell membranes to kill bacteria (Kim et al., 2008; Nguyen et al., 2015; Park et al., 2017; Martinez-Serna et al., 2021), MW has shown good development potential in the sterilization and biofilm destruction of laboratory and medical equipment (Yezdani et al., 2015), foods (Song and Kang, 2016; Cho and Chung, 2020), and environment (Mawioo et al., 2016; Tong et al., 2016). Recently, many microwave systems (Hoff et al., 2021; Tilley et al., 2021) have been used for the inactivation of airborne pathogens, and the effect of killing pathogens is remarkable, which gives us hope for the development and application of microwave in vitro sterilization. Since MW is extremely sensitive to changes in surrounding conductivity caused by bacterial growth (Mohammadi et al., 2020; Jain et al., 2021a,b). And low-power, short-term MW can alter bacterial cell membrane permeability, with the help of nanotubes, MW radiation can induce NAME on bacterial cell membranes (Gao et al., 2019). These capabilities lead to a faster method for bacterial monitoring, identification and antibiotic susceptibility than traditional methods. This can help optimize antibiotic prescribing, reduce resistance and prevent the spread of multidrug-resistant pathogens. In addition, the change of bacterial cell membrane permeability makes it possible to extract bacterial intracellular substances and intracellular delivery of drugs. In recent years, microwave imaging technology has provided a high-contrast, non-invasive, and rapid imaging method (Modiri et al., 2017; Lin, 2021). Tissue water content is a key factor in microwave imaging, and tissue edema and high blood flow at the site of infection make it possible to diagnose and monitor infections using microwave imaging.
In vivo, MW is a promising treatment modality with the advantages of simple operation, less invasiveness, deep penetration depth, local controllability, high heating efficiency, and a wide heating area (Gu et al., 2011; Vogl et al., 2011). At present, MW has been widely used in clinical treatment for tumors, warts, underarm odor, hypertrophy of turbinates and various non-infectious inflammations (Hsu et al., 2017; Fu et al., 2019; Jackson et al., 2020; Llovet et al., 2021). This proves that MW is safe under reasonable operation and has certain clinical application value. However, the application of MW to human treatment of infectious diseases still needs further exploration and research.
For local body surface infection, local MW radiation can be given directly, combined with antibiotics, which can not only promote local blood circulation, but also the drug can better enter the bacteria with altered membrane permeability, which is beneficial to the killing of bacteria. For local deep infection (such as: joint cavity infection, periprosthetic infection, etc.), if you want to kill bacteria through simple MW, it will cause damage to normal human tissues. At present, there have been relevant animal experimental studies trying to combine MW with other treatment methods to carry out effective antibacterial in vivo (Qi et al., 2019; Qiao et al., 2020). In recently years, photodynamic and photothermal therapy related research on in vivo sterilization is relatively popular. With the development of MW sensitizers, MW is expected to become an excitation switch for microwave hyperthermia and microwave dynamic therapy. When the drug reaches the local area (targeted at the infection site or enrichment caused by local temperature increase), MW radiation is applied to achieve thermal effect sterilization and biodynamic sterilization. Cause MW sensitizers can easily convert microwave energy into heat, the application of these materials can reduce side effects on surrounding objects and improve microwave heating efficiency (Gu et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2012; Wu et al., 2018a), and the microwave sensitizer promotes MW to produce harmful active substances or in a similar way to electroporation, thereby sterilizing. Due to these advantages, MW can be used to treat deep-seated infections (Xiang and Chen, 2019). However, the biocompatibility of MW sensitizers should be further investigated before in vivo application.
In summary, low-energy, short-duration microwave irradiation can lead to the permeabilization of bacterial membranes (Nguyen et al., 2015). This capability could be used to develop a new bacterial membrane permeation technology by which the sensitivity of bacteria to antibiotics can be increased, and bacterial drug delivery, bacterial gene therapy, and biomedical engineering can be enabled. In the treatment of human infectious diseases, MW can increase blood flow through the thermal effect, promote the local accumulation of drugs and enter the bacterial cell membrane by changing the bacterial membrane permeability. And the sterilization ability of MW hyperthermia and MW dynamic therapy can be enhanced with the assistance of MW sensitizers.
Challenges
There are some hurdles that need to be addressed in the application of MW. First, electromagnetic interference is a serious problem that can cause electrical equipment to fail, affecting lives (Jang et al., 2020), and is also recognized as the fourth largest public nuisance after air pollution, water pollution and noise pollution (Saini et al., 2009; Green and Chen, 2019). Fortunately, an increasing number of researchers have devoted themselves to the field of MW absorption and electromagnetic interference shielding and have achieved many excellent research results (Quan et al., 2017; Wang L. et al., 2021). Second, the temperature control of MW irradiation is limited, which poses a risk for in vivo therapy because MW interacts with all polar molecules (Martinez-Serna et al., 2021; Shaw et al., 2021). At present, there is still a lack of relevant research on the effects of MWs of different frequencies on the human body, and further research is needed. However, it is undeniable that MW therapy has achieved great success in tumors in vivo (Chen et al., 2020; Cazzato et al., 2021). Finally, knowledge of the mechanisms and the non-thermal effects of MW is limited. Therefore, for the further application of MW, it is necessary and urgent to study the MW-related mechanisms in depth. Despite these limitations, with the widespread use of MW (Nagahata and Takeuchi, 2019; Yang and Park, 2019; Mirzadeh et al., 2020), these challenges will eventually be resolved, and the widespread application of MW in the field of bacteria will be realized.
Statements
Author contributions
ZZ: conceptualization and writing – original draft. JW: writing – original draft. YH: writing – review and editing. LW: conceptualization and writing – review and editing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This study was supported by the Key Research and Development Program of Hunan Province of China (Grant No: 2021SK2005), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No: 81873988), and Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (CN) (Grant No: 2022JJ30962).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AlavI.SuttonJ. M.RahmanK. M. (2018). Role of bacterial efflux pumps in biofilm formation.J Antimicrob Chemother732003–2020. 10.1093/jac/dky042
2
AnderssonA.RonnerU.GranumP. E. (1995). What problems does the food industry have with the spore-forming pathogens Bacillus cereus and Clostridium perfringens?Int J Food Microbiol28145–155. 10.1016/0168-1605(95)00053-4
3
AshC.DubecM.DonneK.BashfordT. (2017). Effect of wavelength and beam width on penetration in light-tissue interaction using computational methods.Lasers Med Sci321909–1918. 10.1007/s10103-017-2317-4
4
BoyleE. C.BishopJ. L.GrasslG. A.FinlayB. B. (2007). Salmonella: from pathogenesis to therapeutics.J Bacteriol1891489–1495. 10.1128/JB.01730-06
5
CaoJ. X.WangF.LiX.SunY. Y.WangY.OuC. R.et al (2018). The Influence of Microwave Sterilization on the Ultrastructure, Permeability of Cell Membrane and Expression of Proteins of Bacillus Cereus.Front Microbiol9:1870. 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01870
6
CaputoL.QuintieriL.CavalluzziM. M.LentiniG.HabtemariamS. (2018). Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Activities of Citrus Water-Extracts Obtained by Microwave-Assisted and Conventional Methods.Biomedicines670. 10.3390/biomedicines6020070
7
CazzatoR. L.de RubeisG.de MariniP.DaliliD.KochG.AulogeP.et al (2021). Percutaneous microwave ablation of bone tumors: a systematic review.Eur Radiol313530–3541. 10.1007/s00330-020-07382-8
8
ChenH.BattalapalliD.DrazM. S.ZhangP.RuanZ. (2021). The Application of Cell-Penetrating-Peptides in Antibacterial Agents.Curr Med Chem285896–5925. 10.2174/0929867328666210322162809
9
ChenZ.DouX.ZhangY.YangM.WeiD. (2019). Rapid thermal-acid hydrolysis of spiramycin by silicotungstic acid under microwave irradiation.Environ Pollut24936–44. 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.02.074
10
ChenZ.GuoW.WuQ.TanL.MaT.FuC.et al (2020). Tumor reoxygenation for enhanced combination of radiation therapy and microwave thermal therapy using oxygen generation in situ by CuO nanosuperparticles under microwave irradiation.Theranostics104659–4675. 10.7150/thno.42818
11
ChoW. I.ChungM. S. (2020). Improving the quality of vegetable foodstuffs by microwave inactivation.Food Sci Biotechnol2985–91. 10.1007/s10068-019-00652-2
12
CuiB.SunY.WangK.LiuY.FuH.WangY.et al (2022). Pasteurization mechanism on the cellular level of radio frequency heating and its possible non-thermal effect.Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies78103026. 10.1016/j.ifset.2022.103026
13
DostertM.BelangerC. R.HancockR. E. W. (2019). Design and Assessment of Anti-Biofilm Peptides: Steps Toward Clinical Application.J Innate Immun11193–204. 10.1159/000491497
14
ElbourneA.CheesemanS.AtkinP.TruongN. P.SyedN.ZavabetiA.et al (2020). Antibacterial Liquid Metals: Biofilm Treatment via Magnetic Activation.ACS Nano14802–817. 10.1021/acsnano.9b07861
15
EmaraK. M.GhafarK. A.Al KershM. A. (2011). Methods to shorten the duration of an external fixator in the management of tibial infections.World J Orthop285–92. 10.5312/wjo.v2.i9.85
16
FisherR. A.GollanB.HelaineS. (2017). Persistent bacterial infections and persister cells.Nat Rev Microbiol15453–464. 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.42
17
FournierP. E.DrancourtM.ColsonP.RolainJ. M.La ScolaB.RaoultD. (2013). Modern clinical microbiology: new challenges and solutions.Nat Rev Microbiol11574–585. 10.1038/nrmicro3068
18
FuT.LineaweaverW. C.ZhangF.ZhangJ. (2019). Role of shortwave and microwave diathermy in peripheral neuropathy.J Int Med Res473569–3579. 10.1177/0300060519854905
19
GabrićD.BarbaF.RoohinejadS.GharibzahediS. M. T.RadojèinM.PutnikP.et al (2018). Pulsed electric fields as an alternative to thermal processing for preservation of nutritive and physicochemical properties of beverages: A review.Journal of Food Process Engineering41e12638. 10.1111/jfpe.12638
20
GaoJ.LiH.TorabP.MachK. E.CraftD. W.ThomasN. J.et al (2019). Nanotube assisted microwave electroporation for single cell pathogen identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing.Nanomedicine17246–253. 10.1016/j.nano.2019.01.015
21
GaoW.ChenY.ZhangY.ZhangQ.ZhangL. (2018). Nanoparticle-based local antimicrobial drug delivery.Adv Drug Deliv Rev12746–57. 10.1016/j.addr.2017.09.015
22
GarnerA. L. (2019). Pulsed electric field inactivation of microorganisms: from fundamental biophysics to synergistic treatments.Appl Microbiol Biotechnol1037917–7929. 10.1007/s00253-019-10067-y
23
GarnerA. L.DeminskyM.NeculaesV. B.ChashihinV.KnizhnikA.PotapkinB. (2013). Cell membrane thermal gradients induced by electromagnetic fields.Journal of Applied Physics113214701. 10.1063/1.4809642
24
GergenP. J. (2001). Understanding the economic burden of asthma.J Allergy Clin Immunol107(5 Suppl.), S445–S448. 10.1067/mai.2001.114992
25
GhoshC.SarkarP.IssaR.HaldarJ. (2019). Alternatives to Conventional Antibiotics in the Era of Antimicrobial Resistance.Trends Microbiol27323–338. 10.1016/j.tim.2018.12.010
26
GoelK.GuptaR.SolankiJ.NayakM. (2014). A comparative study between microwave irradiation and sodium hypochlorite chemical disinfection: a prosthodontic view.J Clin Diagn Res8ZC42–ZC46. 10.7860/JCDR/2014/8578.4274
27
GreenM.ChenX. B. (2019). Recent progress of nanomaterials for microwave absorption.Journal of Materiomics5503–541. 10.1016/j.jmat.2019.07.003
28
GuX.ZhuW.JiaC.ZhaoR.SchmidtW.WangY. (2011). Synthesis and microwave absorbing properties of highly ordered mesoporous crystalline NiFe2O4.Chem Commun (Camb)475337–5339. 10.1039/c0cc05800a
29
HanQ.LauJ. W.DoT. C.ZhangZ.XingB. (2021). Near-Infrared Light Brightens Bacterial Disinfection: Recent Progress and Perspectives.ACS Appl Bio Mater43937–3961. 10.1021/acsabm.0c01341
30
HathroubiS.MekniM. A.DomenicoP.NguyenD.JacquesM. (2017). Biofilms: Microbial Shelters Against Antibiotics.Microb Drug Resist23147–156. 10.1089/mdr.2016.0087
31
HeW.GuoY.GaoH.LiuJ.YueY.WangJ. (2020). Evaluation of Regeneration Processes for Filtering Facepiece Respirators in Terms of the Bacteria Inactivation Efficiency and Influences on Filtration Performance.ACS Nano1413161–13171. 10.1021/acsnano.0c04782
32
HelaineS.ChevertonA. M.WatsonK. G.FaureL. M.MatthewsS. A.HoldenD. W. (2014). Internalization of Salmonella by macrophages induces formation of nonreplicating persisters.Science343204–208. 10.1126/science.1244705
33
HoffB. W.McConahaJ. W.CohickZ. W.FranziM. A.EnderichD. A.RevelliD.et al (2021). Apparatus for controlled microwave exposure of aerosolized pathogens.Rev Sci Instrum92014707. 10.1063/5.0032823
34
HolmesA. H.MooreL. S.SundsfjordA.SteinbakkM.RegmiS.KarkeyA.et al (2016). Understanding the mechanisms and drivers of antimicrobial resistance.Lancet387176–187. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00473-0
35
HsuT. H.ChenY. T.TuY. K.LiC. N. (2017). A systematic review of microwave-based therapy for axillary hyperhidrosis.J Cosmet Laser Ther19275–282. 10.1080/14764172.2017.1303168
36
IbelliT.TempletonS.Levi-PolyachenkoN. (2018). Progress on utilizing hyperthermia for mitigating bacterial infections.Int J Hyperthermia34144–156. 10.1080/02656736.2017.1369173
37
InanmazM. E.UsluM.IsikC.KayaE.TasT.BayramR. (2014). Extracorporeal shockwave increases the effectiveness of systemic antibiotic treatment in implant-related chronic osteomyelitis: experimental study in a rat model.J Orthop Res32752–756. 10.1002/jor.22604
38
JacksonD. N.HogarthF. J.SutherlandD.HolmesE. M.DonnanP. T.ProbyC. M. (2020). A feasibility study of microwave therapy for precancerous actinic keratosis.Br J Dermatol183222–230. 10.1111/bjd.18935
39
JainM. C.NadarajaA. V.MohammadiS.VizcainoB. M.ZarifiM. H. (2021a). Passive Microwave Biosensor for Real-Time Monitoring of Subsurface Bacterial Growth.IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst15122–132. 10.1109/TBCAS.2021.3055227
40
JainM. C.NadarajaA. V.NarangR.ZarifiM. H. (2021b). Rapid and real-time monitoring of bacterial growth against antibiotics in solid growth medium using a contactless planar microwave resonator sensor.Sci Rep1114775. 10.1038/s41598-021-94139-y
41
JangC.ParkJ. K.YunG. H.ChoiH. H.LeeH. J.YookJ. G. (2020). Radio-Frequency/Microwave Gas Sensors Using Conducting Polymer.Materials (Basel)132859. 10.3390/ma13122859
42
KaramG.ChastreJ.WilcoxM. H.VincentJ. L. (2016). Antibiotic strategies in the era of multidrug resistance.Crit Care20136. 10.1186/s13054-016-1320-7
43
KatsukiS.NomuraN.KogaH.AkiyamaH.UchidaI.AbeS. I. (2007). Biological effects of narrow band pulsed electric fields.IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON DIELECTRICS AND ELECTRICAL INSULATION14663–668. 10.1109/TDEI.2007.369529
44
KimS. Y.JoE. K.KimH. J.BaiK.ParkJ. K. (2008). The effects of high-power microwaves on the ultrastructure of Bacillus subtilis.Lett Appl Microbiol4735–40. 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2008.02384.x
45
KleinE. Y.Van BoeckelT. P.MartinezE. M.PantS.GandraS.LevinS. A.et al (2018). Global increase and geographic convergence in antibiotic consumption between 2000 and 2015.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A115E3463–E3470. 10.1073/pnas.1717295115
46
Kor-BicakciG.AbbottT.Ubay-CokgorE.EskiciogluC. (2020). Occurrence of the Persistent Antimicrobial Triclosan in Microwave Pretreated and Anaerobically Digested Municipal Sludges under Various Process Conditions.Molecules25310. 10.3390/molecules25020310
47
KuoF. Y.LinW. L.ChenY. C. (2016). Affinity capture using peptide-functionalized magnetic nanoparticles to target Staphylococcus aureus.Nanoscale89217–9225. 10.1039/c6nr00368k
48
KuznetsovD. B.OrlovaE. V.NeschislyaevV. A.VolkhinI. L.IzmestievI. V.LunegovI. V.et al (2017). Epitaxy of the bound water phase on hydrophilic surfaces of biopolymers as key mechanism of microwave radiation effects on living objects.Colloids and Surfaces B-Biointerfaces15440–47. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.03.014
49
LaParaT. M.BurchT. R.McNamaraP. J.TanD. T.YanM.EichmillerJ. J. (2011). Tertiary-treated municipal wastewater is a significant point source of antibiotic resistance genes into Duluth-Superior Harbor.Environ Sci Technol459543–9549. 10.1021/es202775r
50
LiJ.NickelR.WuJ.LinF.van LieropJ.LiuS. (2019). A new tool to attack biofilms: driving magnetic iron-oxide nanoparticles to disrupt the matrix.Nanoscale116905–6915. 10.1039/c8nr09802f
51
LiangY.WuY.SunK.ChenQ.ShenF.ZhangJ.et al (2012). Rapid inactivation of biological species in the air using atmospheric pressure nonthermal plasma.Environ Sci Technol463360–3368. 10.1021/es203770q
52
LinJ. C. (2021). Microwave thermoacoustic tomographic (MTT) imaging.Phys Med Biol6610TR02. 10.1088/1361-6560/abf954
53
LlovetJ. M.De BaereT.KulikL.HaberP. K.GretenT. F.MeyerT.et al (2021). Locoregional therapies in the era of molecular and immune treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma.Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol18293–313. 10.1038/s41575-020-00395-0
54
MackowiakP. A. (1981). Direct effects of hyperthermia on pathogenic microorganisms: Teleologic implications with regard to fever.Rev Infect Dis3508–520. 10.1093/clinids/3.3.508
55
MaisonneuveE.Castro-CamargoM.GerdesK. (2018). (p)ppGpp Controls Bacterial Persistence by Stochastic Induction of Toxin-Antitoxin Activity.Cell1721135. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.023
56
MakabentaJ. M. V.NabawyA.LiC. H.Schmidt-MalanS.PatelR.RotelloV. M. (2021). Nanomaterial-based therapeutics for antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections.Nat Rev Microbiol1923–36. 10.1038/s41579-020-0420-1
57
MandalR.MohammadiX.WiktorA.SinghA.SinghA. P. (2020). Applications of Pulsed Light Decontamination Technology in Food Processing: An Overview.Applied Sciences-Basel103606. 10.3390/app10103606
58
Martinez-SernaI. V.MagdalenoM. O.Cepeda-BravoJ. A.Romo-RamirezG. F.Sanchez-VargasL. O. (2021). Does microwave and hydrogen peroxide disinfection reduce Candida albicans biofilm on polymethyl methacrylate denture surfaces?J Prosthet Dent[Epub ahead of print]. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.02.012
59
MattssonV.AckermansL.MandalB.PerezM. D.VesseurM. A. M.MeaneyP.et al (2021). MAS: Standalone Microwave Resonator to Assess Muscle Quality.Sensors (Basel)215485. 10.3390/s21165485
60
MawiooP. M.RweyemamuA.GarciaH. A.HooijmansC. M.BrdjanovicD. (2016). Evaluation of a microwave based reactor for the treatment of blackwater sludge.Sci Total Environ548-54972–81. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.013
61
McAvoyD. C.SchatowitzB.JacobM.HaukA.EckhoffW. S. (2002). Measurement of triclosan in wastewater treatment systems.Environ Toxicol Chem211323–1329.
62
MelendezJ. H.HuppertJ. S.Jett-GoheenM.HesseE. A.QuinnN.GaydosC. A.et al (2013). Blind evaluation of the microwave-accelerated metal-enhanced fluorescence ultrarapid and sensitive Chlamydia trachomatis test by use of clinical samples.J Clin Microbiol512913–2920. 10.1128/JCM.00980-13
63
MenezesS.TeixeiraP. (1992). Lethal interaction between heat and methylene blue in Escherichia coli.Int J Hyperthermia8689–699. 10.3109/02656739209038004
64
MirzadehM.ArianejadM. R.KhedmatL. (2020). Antioxidant, antiradical, and antimicrobial activities of polysaccharides obtained by microwave-assisted extraction method: A review.Carbohydr Polym229115421. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115421
65
ModiriA.GoudreauS.RahimiA.KiasalehK. (2017). Review of breast screening: Toward clinical realization of microwave imaging.Med Phys44e446–e458. 10.1002/mp.12611
66
MohammadiS.NadarajaA. V.LuckasavitchK.JainM. C.June RobertsD.ZarifiM. H. (2020). A Label-Free, Non-Intrusive, and Rapid Monitoring of Bacterial Growth on Solid Medium Using Microwave Biosensor.IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst142–11. 10.1109/TBCAS.2019.2952841
67
Monserrat-MartinezA.GambinY.SiereckiE. (2019). Thinking Outside the Bug: Molecular Targets and Strategies to Overcome Antibiotic Resistance.Int J Mol Sci201255. 10.3390/ijms20061255
68
MunirM.WongK.XagorarakiI. (2011). Release of antibiotic resistant bacteria and genes in the effluent and biosolids of five wastewater utilities in Michigan.Water Res45681–693. 10.1016/j.watres.2010.08.033
69
NagahataR.TakeuchiK. (2019). Encouragements for the Use of Microwaves in Industrial Chemistry.Chem Rec1951–64. 10.1002/tcr.201800064
70
NaquinA.ShresthaA.SherpaM.NathanielR.BoopathyR. (2015). Presence of antibiotic resistance genes in a sewage treatment plant in Thibodaux, Louisiana, USA.Bioresour Technol18879–83. 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.01.052
71
NguyenT. H.ShamisY.CroftR. J.WoodA.McIntoshR. L.CrawfordR. J.et al (2015). 18 GHz electromagnetic field induces permeability of Gram-positive cocci.Sci Rep510980. 10.1038/srep10980
72
OjhaS. C.ChankhamhaengdechaS.SinghakaewS.OunjaiP.JanvilisriT. (2016). Inactivation of Clostridium difficile spores by microwave irradiation.Anaerobe3814–20. 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2015.10.015
73
PapiniE.MonpeyssenH.FrasoldatiA.HegedusL. (2020). 2020 European Thyroid Association Clinical Practice Guideline for the Use of Image-Guided Ablation in Benign Thyroid Nodules.Eur Thyroid J9172–185. 10.1159/000508484
74
ParkH. S.YangJ.ChoiH. J.KimK. H. (2017). Effective Thermal Inactivation of the Spores of Bacillus cereus Biofilms Using Microwave.J Microbiol Biotechnol271209–1215. 10.4014/jmb.1702.02009
75
PengZ.LingL.StrattonC. W.LiC.PolageC. R.WuB.et al (2018). Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of Clostridium difficile infections.Emerg Microbes Infect715. 10.1038/s41426-017-0019-4
76
PollockA. M.SinghA. P.RamaswamyH. S.NgadiM. O. (2017). Pulsed light destruction kinetics of L. monocytogenes.Lwt-Food Science and Technology84114–121. 10.1016/j.lwt.2017.05.040
77
PrudenA.PeiR.StorteboomH.CarlsonK. H. (2006). Antibiotic resistance genes as emerging contaminants: studies in northern Colorado.Environ Sci Technol407445–7450. 10.1021/es060413l
78
QiX. Y.QiuX. S.JiangJ. Y.ChenY. X.TangL. M.ShiH. F. (2019). Microwaves increase the effectiveness of systemic antibiotic treatment in acute bone infection: experimental study in a rat model.J Orthop Surg Res14286. 10.1186/s13018-019-1342-3
79
QiaoM.YingG. G.SingerA. C.ZhuY. G. (2018). Review of antibiotic resistance in China and its environment.Environ Int110160–172. 10.1016/j.envint.2017.10.016
80
QiaoY.LiuX.LiB.HanY.ZhengY.YeungK. W. K.et al (2020). Treatment of MRSA-infected osteomyelitis using bacterial capturing, magnetically targeted composites with microwave-assisted bacterial killing.Nat Commun114446. 10.1038/s41467-020-18268-0
81
QuanB.LiangX. H.JiG. B.ChengY.LiuW.MaJ. N.et al (2017). Dielectric polarization in electromagnetic wave absorption: Review and perspective.Journal of Alloys and Compounds7281065–1075. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.09.082
82
RaoN.ZiranB. H.LipskyB. A. (2011). Treating osteomyelitis: antibiotics and surgery.Plast Reconstr Surg127(Suppl. 1), 177S–187S. 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182001f0f
83
Rezek JambrakA.SimunekM.EvacicS.MarkovK.SmoljanicG.FreceJ. (2018). Influence of high power ultrasound on selected moulds, yeasts and Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris in apple, cranberry and blueberry juice and nectar.Ultrasonics833–17. 10.1016/j.ultras.2017.02.011
84
RicciA. D.RizzoA.BonucciC.TavolariS.PalloniA.FregaG.et al (2020). The (Eternal) Debate on Microwave Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation in BCLC-A Hepatocellular Carcinoma.In Vivo343421–3429. 10.21873/invivo.12181
85
RobertsonK.GreenA.AllenL.IhryT.WhiteP.ChenW. S.et al (2016). Foodborne Outbreaks Reported to the U.S. Food Safety and Inspection Service, Fiscal Years 2007 through 2012.J Food Prot79442–447. 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-376
86
RougierC.ProrotA.ChazalP.LevequeP.LepratP. (2014). Thermal and nonthermal effects of discontinuous microwave exposure (2.45 gigahertz) on the cell membrane of Escherichia coli.Appl Environ Microbiol804832–4841. 10.1128/AEM.00789-14
87
RuedigerH. W. (2009). Genotoxic effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields.Pathophysiology1689–102. 10.1016/j.pathophys.2008.11.004
88
RuiterS. J. S.HeerinkW. J.de JongK. P. (2019). Liver microwave ablation: a systematic review of various FDA-approved systems.Eur Radiol294026–4035. 10.1007/s00330-018-5842-z
89
SainiP.ChoudharyV.SinghB. P.MathurR. B.DhawanS. K. (2009). Polyaniline-MWCNT nanocomposites for microwave absorption and EMI shielding.Materials Chemistry and Physics113919–926. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2008.08.065
90
ShamisY.CroftR.TaubeA.CrawfordR. J.IvanovaE. P. (2012). Review of the specific effects of microwave radiation on bacterial cells.Appl Microbiol Biotechnol96319–325. 10.1007/s00253-012-4339-y
91
ShamisY.TaubeA.Mitik-DinevaN.CroftR.CrawfordR. J.IvanovaE. P. (2011). Specific electromagnetic effects of microwave radiation on Escherichia coli.Appl Environ Microbiol773017–3022. 10.1128/AEM.01899-10
92
ShawP.KumarN.MumtazS.LimJ. S.JangJ. H.KimD.et al (2021). Evaluation of non-thermal effect of microwave radiation and its mode of action in bacterial cell inactivation.Sci Rep1114003. 10.1038/s41598-021-93274-w
93
ShiL.ChenJ.TengL.WangL.ZhuG.LiuS.et al (2016). The Antibacterial Applications of Graphene and Its Derivatives.Small124165–4184. 10.1002/smll.201601841
94
ShuQ.LouH.WeiT.ZhangX.ChenQ. (2021). Synergistic antibacterial and antibiofilm effects of ultrasound and MEL-A against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.Ultrason Sonochem72105452. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2020.105452
95
SkowronK.Wiktorczyk-KapischkeN.Grudlewska-BudaK.Wałecka-ZacharskaE.Kwiecińska-PirógJ. (2022). “Chapter 18 - Other microwave-assisted processes: Microwaves as a method ensuring microbiological safety of food,” in Innovative and Emerging Technologies in the Bio-marine Food Sector, edsGarcia-VaqueroM.RajauriaG. (Cambridge, MA: Academic Press), 395–416.
96
SongJ.GarnerA. L.JoshiR. P. (2017). Effect of Thermal Gradients Created by Electromagnetic Fields on Cell-Membrane Electroporation Probed by Molecular-Dynamics Simulations.PHYSICAL REVIEW APPLIED7024003. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.7.024003
97
SongW. J.KangD. H. (2016). Influence of water activity on inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella Typhimurium and Listeria monocytogenes in peanut butter by microwave heating.Food Microbiol60104–111. 10.1016/j.fm.2016.06.010
98
SunH.HongY.XiY.ZouY.GaoJ.DuJ. (2018). Synthesis, Self-Assembly, and Biomedical Applications of Antimicrobial Peptide-Polymer Conjugates.Biomacromolecules191701–1720. 10.1021/acs.biomac.8b00208
99
TagliabueA.RappuoliR. (2018). Changing Priorities in Vaccinology: Antibiotic Resistance Moving to the Top.Front Immunol9:1068. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01068
100
TennantS. M.ZhangY.GalenJ. E.GeddesC. D.LevineM. M. (2011). Ultra-fast and sensitive detection of non-typhoidal Salmonella using microwave-accelerated metal-enhanced fluorescence (”MAMEF”).PLoS One6:e18700. 10.1371/journal.pone.0018700
101
TilleyB. S.HoffB. W.LuginslandJ. W.ParkerJ.WharmbyA.ThomasR.et al (2021). On thermal inactivation of pathogens in aerosolized droplets through electromagnetic heating.Journal of Applied Physics130184701. 10.1063/5.0064625
102
TongJ.LiuJ.ZhengX.ZhangJ.NiX.ChenM.et al (2016). Fate of antibiotic resistance bacteria and genes during enhanced anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge by microwave pretreatment.Bioresour Technol21737–43. 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.02.130
103
TorgomyanH.TrchounianA. (2013). Bactericidal effects of low-intensity extremely high frequency electromagnetic field: an overview with phenomenon, mechanisms, targets and consequences.Crit Rev Microbiol39102–111. 10.3109/1040841X.2012.691461
104
TsuchidoT.KatsuiN.TakeuchiA.TakanoM.ShibasakiI. (1985). Destruction of the outer membrane permeability barrier of Escherichia coli by heat treatment.Appl Environ Microbiol50298–303. 10.1128/aem.50.2.298-303.1985
105
Van GiauV.AnS. S. A.HulmeJ. (2019). Recent advances in the treatment of pathogenic infections using antibiotics and nano-drug delivery vehicles.Drug Des Devel Ther13327–343. 10.2147/DDDT.S190577
106
van WolferenM.OrellA.AlbersS. V. (2018). Archaeal biofilm formation.Nat Rev Microbiol16699–713. 10.1038/s41579-018-0058-4
107
VoglT. J.NaguibN. N.Gruber-RouhT.KoitkaK.LehnertT.Nour-EldinN. E. (2011). Microwave ablation therapy: clinical utility in treatment of pulmonary metastases.Radiology261643–651. 10.1148/radiol.11101643
108
WangC.HuX.ZhangZ. (2019a). Airborne disinfection using microwave-based technology: Energy efficient and distinct inactivation mechanism compared with waterborne disinfection.J Aerosol Sci137105437. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2019.105437
109
WangC.ZhangZ. W.LiuH. (2019b). Microwave-induced release and degradation of airborne endotoxins from Escherichia coli bioaerosol.J Hazard Mater36627–33. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.11.088
110
WangG.GaoZ.TangS.ChenC.DuanF.ZhaoS.et al (2012). Microwave absorption properties of carbon nanocoils coated with highly controlled magnetic materials by atomic layer deposition.ACS Nano611009–11017. 10.1021/nn304630h
111
WangJ.WangD.YanH.TaoL.WeiY.LiY.et al (2017). An injectable ionic hydrogel inducing high temperature hyperthermia for microwave tumor ablation.J Mater Chem B54110–4120. 10.1039/c7tb00556c
112
WangL.LiX.ShiX.HuangM.LiX.ZengQ.et al (2021). Recent progress of microwave absorption microspheres by magnetic-dielectric synergy.Nanoscale132136–2156. 10.1039/d0nr06267g
113
WangQ.VachonJ.PrasadB.PybusC. A.LapinN.ChopraR.et al (2021). Alternating magnetic fields and antibiotics eradicate biofilm on metal in a synergistic fashion.NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes768. 10.1038/s41522-021-00239-y
114
WangY.SunH. (2021). Polymeric Nanomaterials for Efficient Delivery of Antimicrobial Agents.Pharmaceutics132108. 10.3390/pharmaceutics13122108
115
WeiS. B.QiaoY. Q.WuZ. C.LiuX. M.LiY.CuiZ. D.et al (2021). Na+ inserted metal-organic framework for rapid therapy of bacteria-infected osteomyelitis through microwave strengthened Fenton reaction and thermal effects.Nano Today37101090.
116
WeissJ.WinkelmannM. T.GohlaG.KublerJ.ClasenS.NikolaouK.et al (2020). MR-guided microwave ablation in hepatic malignancies: clinical experiences from 50 procedures.Int J Hyperthermia37349–355. 10.1080/02656736.2020.1750713
117
WolfmeierH.PletzerD.MansourS. C.HancockR. E. W. (2018). New Perspectives in Biofilm Eradication.ACS Infect Dis493–106. 10.1021/acsinfecdis.7b00170
118
WooI. S.RheeI. K.ParkH. D. (2000). Differential damage in bacterial cells by microwave radiation on the basis of cell wall structure.Appl Environ Microbiol662243–2247. 10.1128/AEM.66.5.2243-2247.2000
119
WoodT. K. (2017). Strategies for combating persister cell and biofilm infections.Microb Biotechnol101054–1056. 10.1111/1751-7915.12774
120
WrightG. D. (2010). Antibiotic resistance in the environment: a link to the clinic?Curr Opin Microbiol13589–594. 10.1016/j.mib.2010.08.005
121
WuQ.LiM.TanL.YuJ.ChenZ.SuL.et al (2018a). A tumor treatment strategy based on biodegradable BSA@ZIF-8 for simultaneously ablating tumors and inhibiting infection.Nanoscale Horiz3606–615. 10.1039/c8nh00113h
122
WuQ.YuJ.LiM.TanL.RenX.FuC.et al (2018b). Nanoengineering of nanorattles for tumor treatment by CT imaging-guided simultaneous enhanced microwave thermal therapy and managing inflammation.Biomaterials179122–133. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.06.041
123
WuY.YaoM. S. (2010). Inactivation of bacteria and fungus aerosols using microwave irradiation.Journal of Aerosol Science41682–693. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2010.04.004
124
XiangH.ChenY. (2019). Energy-Converting Nanomedicine.Small15e1805339. 10.1002/smll.201805339
125
YangG.ParkS. J. (2019). Conventional and Microwave Hydrothermal Synthesis and Application of Functional Materials: A Review.Materials (Basel)121177. 10.3390/ma12071177
126
YezdaniA.MahalakshmiK.PadmavathyK. (2015). Orthodontic instrument sterilization with microwave irradiation.J Pharm Bioallied Sci7(Suppl. 1), S111–S115. 10.4103/0975-7406.155847
127
YinW.WangY.LiuL.HeJ. (2019). Biofilms: The Microbial “Protective Clothing” in Extreme Environments.Int J Mol Sci203423. 10.3390/ijms20143423
128
ZhangQ.DamitB.WelchJ.ParkH.WuC. Y.SigmundW. (2010). Microwave assisted nanofibrous air filtration for disinfection of bioaerosols.J Aerosol Sci41880–888. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2010.06.001
129
ZhangT.ZhangM.ZhangX.FangH. H. (2009). Tetracycline resistance genes and tetracycline resistant lactose-fermenting Enterobacteriaceae in activated sludge of sewage treatment plants.Environ Sci Technol433455–3460. 10.1021/es803309m
130
ZhangY.AgredaP.KelleyS.GaydosC.GeddesC. D. (2011). Development of a microwave-accelerated metal-enhanced fluorescence 40 second, <100 cfu/ml point of care assay for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.IEEE Trans Biomed Eng58781–784. 10.1109/TBME.2010.2066275
131
ZhangY.XiuW.SunY.ZhuD.ZhangQ.YuwenL.et al (2017). RGD-QD-MoS2 nanosheets for targeted fluorescent imaging and photothermal therapy of cancer.Nanoscale915835–15845. 10.1039/c7nr05278b
132
ZhuP.ChenD.LiuW.ZhangJ.ShaoL.LiJ. A.et al (2014). Hydroxylation and hydrolysis: two main metabolic ways of spiramycin I in anaerobic digestion.Bioresour Technol15395–100. 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.11.073
133
ZulaufK. E.GreenA. B.Nguyen BaA. N.JagdishT.ReifD.SeeleyR.et al (2020). Microwave-Generated Steam Decontamination of N95 Respirators Utilizing Universally Accessible Materials.mBio11e997–e920. 10.1128/mBio.00997-20
Summary
Keywords
microwave, bacteria, application, biosensor, mechanism
Citation
Zhang Z, Wang J, Hu Y and Wang L (2022) Microwaves, a potential treatment for bacteria: A review. Front. Microbiol. 13:888266. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.888266
Received
07 April 2022
Accepted
05 July 2022
Published
25 July 2022
Volume
13 - 2022
Edited by
Pilar Teixeira, University of Minho, Portugal
Reviewed by
Allen L. Garner, Purdue University, United States; Roberta Palmeri, Institute for the Electromagnetic Detection of the Environment (IREA-CNR), Italy
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Zhang, Wang, Hu and Wang.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Long Wang, dr_wanglong@csu.edu.cn
This article was submitted to Antimicrobials, Resistance and Chemotherapy, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.